Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Uncertainties in the Lightest $CP$ Even Higgs Boson Mass Prediction in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model: Fixed Order Versus Effective Field Theory Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.09410 v3 pith:VDMDM4AZ submitted 2018-04-25 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords masslightestpredictionscalebosoncalculationeffectiveeven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We quantify and examine the uncertainties in predictions of the lightest $CP$ even Higgs boson pole mass $M_h$ in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), utilising current spectrum generators and including some three-loop corrections. There are two broadly different approximations being used: effective field theory (EFT) where an effective Standard Model (SM) is used below a supersymmetric mass scale, and a fixed order calculation, where the MSSM is matched to QCD$\times$QED at the electroweak scale. The uncertainties on the $M_h$ prediction in each approach are broken down into logarithmic and finite pieces. The inferred values of the stop mass parameters are sensitively dependent upon the precision of the prediction for $M_h$. The fixed order calculation appears to be more accurate below a supersymmetry (SUSY) mass scale of $M_S \approx 1.2$ TeV, whereas above this scale, the EFT calculation is more accurate. We also revisit the range of the lightest stop mass across fine-tuned parameter space that has an appropriate stable vacuum and is compatible with the lightest $CP$ even Higgs boson $h$ being identified with the one discovered at the ATLAS and CMS experiments in 2012; we achieve a maximum value of $\sim 10^{11}$ GeV.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Completing the scalar and fermionic Universal One-Loop Effective Action

    hep-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A complete set of generic one-loop Wilson coefficients for scalar and fermion loops up to dimension six, excluding open covariant derivatives, is derived and validated on MSSM examples.

  2. Higgs boson mass and thermal wino dark matter from Starobinsky supergravity with the MSSM

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Starobinsky supergravity coupled to the MSSM links the CMB inflationary scale to the Higgs boson mass (~125 GeV) and predicts thermal wino dark matter at ~3 TeV, testable at future colliders and direct detection experiments.

  3. Higgs-Boson Masses and Mixings in the MSSM with CP Violation and Heavy SUSY Particles

    hep-ph 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the MSSM with heavy SUSY particles and complex phases, the lightest Higgs mass can vary by up to about 20 GeV with the phase of the trilinear couplings, while its CP-odd admixture drops below 0.5% once the charged ...

  4. Full two-loop QCD corrections to the Higgs mass in the MSSM with heavy superpartners

    hep-ph 2019-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The two-loop QCD threshold corrections that mix strong and electroweak couplings in the MSSM Higgs-mass EFT calculation are computed for the first time, completing the two-loop QCD matching at the SUSY scale.

  5. Comparison of the EFT Hybrid and Three-Loop Fixed-Order Calculations of the Lightest MSSM Higgs Boson Mass

    hep-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The FeynHiggs NNLL hybrid and the authors' three-loop fixed-order predictions of the MSSM light Higgs mass agree below 10 TeV, and the measured Higgs mass rules out SUSY scales above 12.5 TeV in the heavy-SUSY, no-mix...

Pith tools