REVIEW 1 cited by
Phenomenological Inclusion of Alternative Dispersion Relations to the Teukolsky Equation and its Application to Bounding the Graviton Mass with Gravitational-wave Measurements
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Existing constraints on the graviton mass from gravitational-wave detections rely on the phase difference developed between different frequencies during the propagation. Effects on the quasinormal-mode frequencies of the black-hole ringdown due to the graviton mass are often ignored. While perturbation theories of black holes have been well developed in the context of general relativity, this is not the case for modified gravity theories. We propose a phenomenological modification to the Teukolsky equation of perturbed black holes to include the dispersion relation due to a gravitational field of nonzero mass. Solving this modified Teukolsky equation by logarithmic perturbation theory, we compute the shift of the quasinormal-mode frequencies due to the presence of a graviton mass. This hypothetical shift can be used to constrain the graviton mass with ringdown signals, either standalone or in conjunction with the phase difference accumulated due to the wave propagation. We estimate that constraints on the graviton mass of $m_g \lesssim 10^{-15}\,\textrm{eV}$ can be put with a detection of the ringdown signal alone by second generation gravitational-wave detectors.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Parameterized and Consistency Tests of Gravity with Gravitational Waves: Current and Future
A review of ppE and IMR consistency tests of GR with GWs, forecasting that future multi-band detectors can improve bounds on modified gravity by orders of magnitude.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.