Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Numerical and Perturbative Computations of the Fuzzy Dark Matter Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.01915 v1 pith:M5U2XVOE submitted 2018-10-03 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords solverschrodinger-poissondynamicsfluidmassnonlinearnumericalperturbation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We investigate nonlinear structure formation in the fuzzy dark matter (FDM) model using both numerical and perturbative techniques. On the numerical side, we examine the virtues and limitations of a Schrodinger-Poisson solver (wave formulation) versus a fluid dynamics solver (Madelung formulation). We also carry out a perturbative computation of the one-loop mass power spectrum. We find that (1) in many cases, the fluid dynamics solver is capable of producing the expected interference patterns, but it fails where destructive interference causes the density to vanish which generally occurs in the nonlinear regime. (2) The Schrodinger-Poisson solver works well in all test cases, but it is demanding in resolution: one must resolve the small de Broglie scale to obtain the correct dynamics on large scales. (3) We compare the mass power spectrum from perturbation theory against that from the Schrodinger-Poisson solver, and find good agreement in the mildly nonlinear regime. Compared with fluid perturbation theory, wave perturbation theory has a more limited range of validity. (4) As an application, we compare the Lyman-alpha forest flux power spectrum obtained from the Schrodinger-Poisson solver versus one from an N-body simulation (which is often used as an approximate method to make predictions for FDM). At redshift 5, the two, starting from the same initial condition, agree to better than 10 % on observationally relevant scales as long as the FDM mass exceeds $2 \times 10^{-23}$ eV.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generating Moving Field Initial Conditions with Spatially Varying Boost

    physics.comp-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 'spatially varying boost' algorithm assigns arbitrary, position-dependent bulk velocities to field initial data by composing local Lorentz boosts, demonstrated on solitons, Proca fields, and spin-1 wave dark matter.

  2. Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Physics-informed generative U-Nets evolve and super-resolve fuzzy dark matter fields under Schrödinger–Poisson constraints with far less supervised data than pure data-driven baselines.

  3. Lyman-$\alpha$ forest constraints on pure and mixed fuzzy dark matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Lyman-alpha forest data yield m_FDM > 1.9e-21 eV (95% CL) for pure FDM and f_FDM upper limits of 0.07-0.65 for mixed FDM at log10(m_FDM/eV) = -23 to -21.

Pith tools