Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Upper Bound of Neutrino Masses from Combined Cosmological Observations and Particle Physics Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.02578 v2 pith:W2Q2AUFW submitted 2018-11-06 astro-ph.CO hep-ex

classification astro-ph.COhep-ex
keywords upperboundneutrinoapproximationscosmologicalmassmodelsconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We investigate the impact of prior models on the upper bound of the sum of neutrino masses, $\sum m_{\nu}$. We use data from Large Scale Structure of galaxies, Cosmic Microwave Background, Type Ia SuperNovae, and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. We probe physically motivated neutrino mass models (respecting oscillation experiment constraints) and compare them to constraints using standard cosmological approximations. The former give a consistent upper bound of $\sum m_{\nu} \lesssim 0.26$ eV ($95\%$ CI) and yields a strong competitive upper bound for the lightest neutrino mass species, $m_0^{\nu} < 0.086$ eV ($95\%$ CI). By contrast one of the approximations, which is somewhat inconsistent with oscillation experiments, yields an upper bound of $\sum m_{\nu} \lesssim 0.15$ eV ($95\%$ CI), which differs substantially from the former upper bound. We, therefore, argue that cosmological neutrino mass and hierarchy determination should be pursued using physically motivated models since approximations might lead to incorrect and nonphysical upper bounds.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools