Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Light Scalar in the Minimal Dilaton Model in Light of LHC Constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.00107 v1 pith:CILYGKRE submitted 2018-12-01 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords gammalesssim0lightusuallyscalarsmallmodelpredicts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Whether an additional light scalar exists is an interesting topic beyond the Standard Model (SM), while nowadays we do not know exactly physics beyond the SM in the low mass region, e.g., the Atlas and CMS collaborations get inconsistent results at around 95 GeV in searching for light resonances in diphoton channel. Considering these, we study a light scalar in the Minimal Dilaton Model (MDM). Under the theoretical and latest experimental constraints, we sort the surviving samples into two scenarios according to the diphoton rate of the light scalar: the large-diphoton scenario (with $/SM\gtrsim0.2$) and the small-diphoton scenario (with $/SM\lesssim0.2$), which are favored by CMS and Atlas results respectively. We compare the two scenarios, check the characteristics in model parameters, scalar couplings, production and decay, and consider further distinguishing them at colliders. Finally, we get the following conclusions for the two scenarios: (i) The formal usually has small Higgs-dilaton mixing angle ($|\sin\theta_S|\lesssim0.2$) and small dilaton vacuum expectation value (VEV) $f$ ($0.5\lesssim\eta\equiv v/f\lesssim1$), and the later usually has large mixing ($|\sin\theta_S|\gtrsim0.4$) or large VEV ($\eta\equiv v/f\lesssim0.3$). (ii) The former usually predicts small $s\gamma\gamma$ coupling ($|C_{s\gamma\gamma}/SM|\lesssim0.3$) and large $sgg$ coupling ($0.6\lesssim|C_{sgg}/SM|\lesssim1.2$), while the later usually predicts small $sgg$ coupling ($|C_{sgg}/SM|\lesssim0.5$). (iii) The former can interpret the small diphoton excess by CMS at its central value, when $m_s\simeq$95GeV, $\eta\simeq0.6$ and $|\sin\theta_S|\simeq0$. (iv) The former usually predicts a negative correlation between Higgs couplings $|C_{h\gamma\gamma}/SM|$ and $|C_{hgg}/SM|$, while the later usually predicts the two couplings both smaller than 1, or $|C_{h\gamma\gamma}/SM|\lesssim0.9 \lesssim|C_{hgg}/SM|$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretation of 95 GeV Excess within the Georgi-Machacek Model in Light of Positive Definiteness Constraints

    hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The Georgi-Machacek model keeps viable parameter space for the 95 GeV diphoton and bbbar excesses under positive definiteness constraints, which the paper finds expand the allowed region relative to tree-level bounded...

Pith tools