REVIEW 1 cited by
Signature of 2HDM at Higgs Factories
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The full one-loop corrections, both the weak and QED corrections, to the process $e^+ e^- \to Z \phi $ ($\phi=h^0,H^0$) in the two Higgs doublet model (2HDM) at the Higgs factories are presented. Up to the $O(\alpha_{em})$ level, the virtual corrections are evaluated by using the FeynArts/FormCalc packages. The real emission corrections are computed using the Feynman Diagram Calculation (FDC) package and the collinear divergences are regularized by the structure functions of an electron. Using the FeynArts/FormCalc and the FDC packages, we study the corrections in the Standard Model (SM) and the 2HDM, respectively. Gauge dependence arising in the normalization of mixing angles is removed by using the pinch technique. After taking into account experimental constraints from the current LHC data, we propose four interesting benchmark scenarios for future colliders. By using these benchmark scenarios, we evaluate the deviation of $\Delta\sigma(e^+ e^- \to Z \phi)$ from their SM values. We also examine Higgs boson decays $\phi\to b\bar{b}$ and $\phi\to \tau^+\tau^-$, which can have large electroweak (EW) contributions from triple Higgs couplings which are absent in the SM. It is found that for these benchmark scenarios, both EW and real emission corrections are sizeable and could be measured at a future $e^+ e^-$ colliders such as the ILC, CLIC, and CEPC.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
One-loop induced contributions to the rare decay of $A_0 \rightarrow h_0h_0\gamma$ in Two Higgs Doublet Models
First complete one-loop analytic calculation of A0 -> h0h0 gamma in the CP-conserving two Higgs doublet model, with benchmark decay rates and differential distributions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.