REVIEW 1 cited by
Sparse Channel Estimation with Gradient-Based Algorithms: A comparative Study
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Channel state information (CSI) is very crucial for any wireless communication systems. Typically, CSI can be characterized at the receiver side using channel impulse response (CIR). Many observations have shown that the CIR of broadband multipath wireless channels are often sparse. To this point, the family of least mean square (LMS)-based algorithms have been widely used to estimate the CIR, unfortunately, the performance of LMS family is not much accurate in terms of sparse channel estimation. The Least Mean Mixed Norm (LMMN) algorithm combines the advantages of both the Least Mean square (LMS) and the Least Mean Fourth (LMF)algorithm, which makes this algorithm stands in a very special position among the family members in terms of convergence and steady state error. In this paper, we held a fair comparative study between the LMMN and a number of the LMS-based algorithms, such as the LMS algorithm, the zero-attracting (ZA-LMS) algorithm, and the normalized (NLMS) algorithm. Simulation results are carried out to compare the performance of all these algorithms with the LMMN algorithm. The results show that the LMMN algorithm outperforms the rest of these algorithms in the identification of sparse systems in terms of both fast convergence and the steady state error.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Large Models Enabled Ubiquitous Wireless Sensing
Spatial CSI prediction experiments on simulated data show a VAE outperforms GPT-2, Transformer, and MLP, but the claimed benefit of fusing environmental features is not tested against a no-feature baseline.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.