Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Holographic Argument for the Penrose Inequality in AdS

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.00555 v2 pith:EY5QE7TJ submitted 2019-03-01 hep-th gr-qc

Netta Engelhardt , Gary T. Horowitz This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords inequalitypenroseargumentapparentareaholographichorizonsapplies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We give a holographic argument in favor of the AdS Penrose inequality, which conjectures a lower bound on the total mass in terms of the area of apparent horizons. This inequality is often viewed as a test of cosmic censorship. We further find a connection between the area law for apparent horizons and the Penrose inequality. Finally, we show that the argument also applies to solutions with charge, resulting in a charged Penrose inequality in AdS.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Weak Cosmic Censorship with spinning particles in Kerr-(A)dS spacetimes

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Extremal Kerr-de Sitter black holes cannot be overspun by spinning test particles, and apparent Kerr-anti-de Sitter overspinning configurations are eliminated once the particle's finite size is respected.

Pith tools