REVIEW 2 cited by
Spatial Curvature in Cosmology Revisited
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
It is necessary to make assumptions in order to derive models to be used for cosmological predictions and comparison with observational data. In particular, in standard cosmology the spatial curvature is assumed to be constant and zero (or at least very small). But there is, as yet, no fully independent constraint with an appropriate accuracy that gaurentees a value for the magnitude of the effective normalized spatial curvature $\Omega_{k}$ of less than approximately $0.01$. Moreover, a small non-zero measurement of $\Omega_{k}$ at such a level perhaps indicates that the assumptions in the standard model are not satisfied. It has also been increasingly emphasised that spatial curvature is, in general, evolving in relativistic cosmological models. We review the current situation, and conclude that the possibility of such a non-zero value of $\Omega_k$ should be taken seriously.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Light path averages in spacetimes with non-vanishing average spatial curvature
Light-path averaged observables in Swiss cheese cosmologies show nearly the same mean and scatter in curved and flat FLRW backgrounds, indicating curvature does not significantly alter the relationship between line-of...
-
Quasar X-ray and UV flux, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter measurement constraints on cosmological model parameters
Quasar X-ray and UV flux data are weak but consistent with BAO and H(z) data, and the joint data mildly favor closed spatial geometry and dynamical dark energy over flat LambdaCDM.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.