Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Cosmological test of gravity using weak lensing voids

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.06657 v2 pith:M7GQLPBQ submitted 2019-07-15 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords voidslensingweakgravitymodifiedbeenbettercosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Modifications to General Relativity (GR) often incorporate screening mechanisms in order to remain compatible with existing tests of gravity. The screening is less efficient in underdense regions, which suggests that cosmic voids can be a useful cosmological probe for constraining modified gravity models. In particular, weak lensing by voids has been proposed as a promising test of such theories. Usually, voids are identified from galaxy distributions, making them biased tracers of the underlying matter field. An alternative approach is to study voids identified in weak lensing maps -- weak lensing voids -- which have been shown to better correspond to true underdense regions. In this paper, we study the ability of weak lensing voids to detect the signatures of modified gravity. Focusing on the void abundance and weak lensing profiles, we find that both statistics are sensitive probes of gravity. These are quantified in terms of the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) with which an LSST-like survey will be able to distinguish between different gravity models. We find that the tangential shear profiles of weak lensing voids are considerably better than galaxy voids at this, though voids have somewhat lower SNR than weak lensing peaks. The abundances of voids and peaks have respectively $\rm{SNR} = 50$ and $70$ for a popular class of modified gravity in an LSST-like survey.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Cosmic Voids Matter: Pristine Evolution

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Cosmic voids traced by halos become stable at late times, and the matter around them evolves linearly, supporting their use as clean dark-energy probes.

  2. Cosmic voids evolution in modified gravity via hydrodynamics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Voids in luminal Galileon gravity are always unscreened, and a reality requirement on the fifth force rules out ~82% of the favored parameter space, yielding a redshift-dependent minimum void depth.

  3. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and light around cosmic voids

    astro-ph.CO 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Around cosmic voids in DES Year 1 data, the galaxy and matter density profiles have the same radial shape, supporting a single scale-independent galaxy bias.

  4. The Novel Probes Project -- Tests of Gravity on Astrophysical Scales

    astro-ph.CO 2019-08 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    Astrophysical-scale observations, combined with screening maps and N-body simulations, can test screened modified-gravity theories in a regime complementary to linear cosmology.

Pith tools