Quasinormal modes of supersymmetric microstate geometries from the D1-D5 CFT

Amitabh Virmani; Bidisha Chakrabarty; Debodirna Ghosh

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quasinormal modes of supersymmetric microstate geometries from the D1-D5 CFT

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read CFT reproduces microstate quasinormal spectrum exactly

desk verdict A genuine near-decoupling CFT match for the stable scalar QNM spectrum of GMS microstate geometries, but the paper's completeness claim rests on an unproven conjecture about unstable B modes. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01461 v2 pith:R2DDQQVS submitted 2019-08-05 hep-th gr-qc

Bidisha Chakrabarty , Debodirna Ghosh , Amitabh Virmani This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 83C5781T4083E30 PACS 04.70.-s11.25.Hf

keywords quasinormalmodesmicrostategeometriesD1-D5orbifoldCFTfuzzballAdSthroatleakagespectralflowsmoothhorizonlesssolutionsscalaremission

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that, in the near-decoupling limit where the GMS three-charge microstate geometries develop a large AdS throat, the complete scalar quasinormal-mode spectrum—real and imaginary parts—is exactly the spectrum of emissions predicted by the D1-D5 orbifold CFT. The match includes the slow-decaying modes that earlier work suggested would drive a nonlinear instability, and it reproduces those modes in the eikonal limit as well. If the identification is right, the slow decay is not a sign of imminent black-hole formation; it is the ordinary leakage of an excitation from the AdS throat out to infinity, and the CFT picture says the geometry settles into another microstate rather than collapse. The argument is carried by matching an inner hypergeometric solution to an outer Bessel solution and reading off frequencies from Gamma-function poles, then reproducing the same formula from a spectral-flowed twist-operator amplitude in the CFT.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the separated scalar wave equation in the near-decoupling limit, solved by matching three regions: an inner solution regular at the cap, which is a hypergeometric function of $x = r^2/a^2$; a power-law neck region; and an outer Bessel solution with purely outgoing boundary conditions. Frequencies are located where Gamma functions in the matching condition develop poles, giving the A-mode spectrum (2.49) and its imaginary part (2.52). On the CFT side, the load-bearing objects are twist operators $\sigma^0_{l+1}$ and their spectral-flowed descendants: the initial state (3.3) and the scalar-emission vertex operator (3.9), whose two-point function supplies the emission rate (3.22). The flux computation uses the same wavefunction to verify that inner-region angular momentum obeys $d(L_\psi)_{\rm in}/dt = 2\omega_I (L_\psi)_{\rm in}$, matched by neck flux. The D1-D5 orbifold CFT is the two-dimensional conformal field theory on $N_1N_5$ copies of $T^4$ with twisted sectors.

What would settle it

Follow the paper's own search: find integers $(n, k, l, M, m_\phi, m_\psi, \lambda)$ satisfying $l \geq |m_\phi| + |m_\psi|$ and the large-$R$ formulas such that $\omega^B_R$ from (2.50) is positive and $(\omega^B_R)^2 - \lambda^2 > 0$; finding even one such physical unstable B mode, or a direct numerical solution of the transcendental matching condition (2.43) with positive imaginary part, would falsify the no-instability claim. On the leaky-picture side, a time-domain evolution of a scalar pulse on the GMS geometry that does not show exponential decay with the predicted exponent $\omega_I$ at late times would count against the identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the limit $\epsilon = (Q_1Q_5)^{1/4}/R \ll 1$, the scalar wave equation on the GMS geometries separates, and regularity at the cap together with purely outgoing waves at infinity gives a transcendental matching condition. The paper derives the real frequencies (2.49) and imaginary parts (2.52) from that condition and shows that the same numbers come out of a D1-D5 orbifold CFT computation: the emitted quanta are gravitons polarised on the internal $T^4$, the initial state is a spectral-flowed descendant of a chiral primary twist operator, and the CFT two-point function yields exactly (3.17) and (3.24), for orbifold parameter $k\geq 1$. The wavefunction analysis then shows that charges stored in the inner region decay with exponent $2\omega_I$, balanced by outward flux across the neck, so the quasinormal modes represent slow leakage from the throat to infinity. The slow-decaying modes flagged in the earlier eikonal study appear in this spectrum as ordinary CFT-predicted emissions.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's completeness claim rests on a conjecture it flags explicitly in Section 2.4: after a partial analytic check and a computer search, it has not proven that no choice of quantum numbers makes a candidate 'B' mode physical, and an undiscovered unstable mode would break the exact CFT reproduction of the full spectrum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The slow-decaying quasinormal modes are ordinary CFT-predicted emissions, so their existence does not by itself signal collapse to a small black hole; the CFT transition suggests the end state is another microstate.
The full scalar spectrum in the near-decoupling limit is fixed by the D1-D5 orbifold CFT data, including the orbifold parameter $k$, so any scalar perturbation of the throat is dual to a known twist/spectral-flow sector of the CFT.
In the overlap regime, the paper's formulas reduce to the earlier eikonal-limit expressions for both the real and imaginary parts, unifying the two descriptions.
Conserved charges of the perturbation in the AdS throat decay monotonically with exponent $2\omega_I$, balanced by outward flux across the neck, so the decay is leakage to infinity.
The same matching procedure gives a criterion for which Gamma-function poles are physical, and the paper argues the unstable B-mode poles cannot be realised consistently with the spherical-harmonic bounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the CFT match is exact to all orders in $1/R$, one could compute the leading corrections to the quasinormal frequencies from the CFT side and compare with a next-order matched-asymptotic expansion on the gravity side; the paper's first-order match leaves that test open.
The conjecture that no physical B modes exist could be sharpened into a selection rule in the CFT: the untwisting amplitude for the B-type spectral-flow quantum numbers should vanish identically, giving a purely CFT check independent of the gravity parameter search.
The leaky-throat picture suggests that for finite-$N$ effects, where stringy microstructure sits at the cap, the decay may not be purely exponential at very late times; an explicit CFT computation of multi-particle or finite-twist corrections would predict deviations from the single-mode $\omega_I$.
The flux/charge-balance method could be applied explicitly to energy and Kaluza-Klein momentum, and to other microstate families, giving a general criterion for when slow modes are leakage-type rather than ergoregion-instability-type.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Main thing to know: this paper does what it claims for the stable modes. In the near-decoupling limit, the scalar QNM spectrum of GMS microstate geometries—including the slow ERS modes—is matched, real and imaginary parts, against D1-D5 orbifold CFT emission. That is a new and useful result. The physical picture of the ERS modes as leakage from the AdS throat is also well supported by the wavefunction analysis in Section 4, where the decay of inner-region charges is shown to equal the outward flux across the neck.

Credit where due: the matched asymptotic calculation is coherent, and the gravity–CFT agreement is non-trivial. The comparison with ERS in Section 2.5 is careful and shows the overlap in the appropriate limits. The paper is also honest that the CFT side is read off from Avery–Chowdhury–Mathur and Avery–Chowdhury rather than derived from scratch; the novelty lies in the correct interpretation and the explicit imaginary-part computation. The citation pattern is fine.

Soft spots: the completeness claim is the real problem. Section 2.4 concedes that excluding unstable B modes remains a conjecture. The partial analytic cases and the computer search check the pole-formula conditions, not the full transcendental equation (2.43) over the whole parameter space. If a physical B mode exists, the gravity spectrum has a mode the CFT does not reproduce, and the "complete spectrum" language in Sections 2.3 and 3.4 is too strong. This does not break the A-mode matching, but it is a load-bearing caveat. The endpoint suggestion—transition to another fuzzball rather than black hole formation—is speculative; the paper acknowledges this, but the conclusions present it as stronger than the evidence warrants.

Who this is for: fuzzball and AdS-CFT researchers, and anyone working on the ERS instability. It deserves a serious referee. The referee should push for either a proof of the B-mode exclusion or a rewording of the completeness claims, and a clearer separation of the leakage picture from the speculative endpoint.

My recommendation: engage with it. With the B-mode question settled or properly qualified, this is a solid paper.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies probe scalar quasinormal modes of the three-charge supersymmetric GMS microstate geometries in the near-decoupling (large-R) limit. Using a matched asymptotic expansion in an intermediate 'neck' region, the authors derive a transcendental equation (2.43) whose solutions give the complex frequencies. They identify two families of formal solutions ('A' and 'B' modes), compute their real parts (2.49)-(2.50) and imaginary parts (2.52)-(2.53), and argue that the potentially unstable B modes do not satisfy the physical conditions. The resulting stable A-mode spectrum is shown to match, with no free parameters, the real and imaginary parts predicted by a D1-D5 orbifold CFT analysis using spectral-flowed descendants of chiral primary states, drawing on earlier emission-rate calculations of Avery-Chowdhury-Mathur and Avery-Chowdhury. The authors also show that the angular momentum and energy of the inner-region perturbation decrease at the QNM decay rate, consistent with the picture of slow leakage from the AdS throat to infinity. In the large angular-momentum limit their expressions reproduce the Eperon-Reall-Santos results in the overlap regime.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper resolves an apparent puzzle: the slow-decaying ERS modes are not a symptom of black-hole formation but ordinary CFT-predicted emissions, and the decay is leakage from the throat. The argument is parameter-free in the matching regime; the CFT spectrum is taken from independent earlier work, and the paper explicitly compares its real and imaginary parts with the ERS eikonal result. The wavefunction-based flux-balance computation is a concrete attempt to make the 'leakage' interpretation quantitative. However, the completeness of the claimed spectrum is conditional on an unproved conjecture excluding physical B modes, and the paper states this limitation explicitly. Because the central claim of exact reproduction of the full spectrum depends on that exclusion, the result is not yet fully established.

major comments (3)

[2.4 (with 2.3 and 3.4)] The statement in Section 2.3 that equations (2.49)-(2.50) give 'the complete spectrum' and the statement in Section 3.4 that 'There are no other modes' depend on excluding the B modes of (2.50) and (2.53). Section 2.4 explicitly concedes: 'it remains a conjecture that one cannot arrange parameters so that unstable modes become physical.' Since a physical B mode (omega_R>0, omega_R^2-lambda^2>0) would be an unstable gravity mode not reproduced by the CFT spectrum, the claimed precise reproduction of the full spectrum is not yet established. The authors should either prove the exclusion or replace the completeness claims by a statement that the result holds under the conjectured exclusion.
[2.4] The computer search described in Section 2.4 checks only the pole-formula conditions (2.47)-(2.48) together with the inequalities omega_R^B>0 and (omega_R^B)^2-lambda^2>0; it does not evaluate the actual transcendental equation (2.43). A root of the pole-formula conditions need not be a root of (2.43), and conversely. The analytic cases cover only a few parameter families. A direct numerical evaluation of (2.43), for example by scanning representative ranges of n,k,l,m_phi,m_psi,lambda with an argument-principle or root-finding method, would provide much stronger evidence and is within the scope of the manuscript.
[4.3 (Eq. 4.36)] The derivation of the neck-region normalization and the flux-balance relation (4.37)-(4.38) assumes delta_N << epsilon ('We assume that delta_N << epsilon so that it can be ignored in the arguments of all the other Gamma functions'). This condition is not proved; delta_N is obtained by solving the matching equation (2.43), and its size depends on the same small parameters. If delta_N is comparable to epsilon, the expressions (4.37) and the equality d/dt (L_psi)_in = -F are not justified. Since the abstract and Section 5 use this balance to support the leakage interpretation, the assumption should be verified (for instance by estimating delta_N from (2.43)) or stated as an additional condition on the validity of the wavefunction analysis.

minor comments (5)

[4.1, Eq. (4.8)] The second integral defining L_phi uses T_psi nu; it should be T_phi nu.
[2.3] The phrase 'This is the complete spectrum' appears before the caveat about B modes; consider moving it after Section 2.4 or adding a qualifier.
[References] Reference [51] is listed as 'to appear' without authors; it should be replaced by a published reference or removed.
[2.3] The binomial coefficients denoted nCm in (2.52)-(2.53) are used without an explicit definition; please define the notation.
[3.1] The text uses both N1,N5 and n1,n5 for the D1 and D5 brane numbers; the notation should be made consistent to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gravity and CFT spectra are independently derived and matched without fitted parameters; the self-citations are technical, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim is a comparison of two independent derivations. On the gravity side, the quasinormal-mode real parts (2.49)-(2.50) and imaginary parts (2.52)-(2.53) are obtained by solving the separated scalar equation (2.24) with a matched-asymptotic expansion and an outgoing boundary condition; no CFT data enter this calculation. On the CFT side, the spectrum (3.10)-(3.11) and the emission rate (3.22) are taken from the independent earlier work of Avery, Chowdhury and Mathur [37,44], and the map between bulk angular momentum quantum numbers and CFT charges is a coordinate dictionary, not a fit. Equations (3.17)=(2.49) and (3.24)=(2.52) match with no adjustable parameters. The cited works involving the present authors, [18] and [40], supply a matched-asymptotics technique and a hypergeometric identity; they do not contain the GMS prediction, and the identity is a parameter-free mathematical statement. The explicit caveat in Section 2.4 — 'it remains a conjecture that one cannot arrange parameters so that unstable modes become physical' — means that the completeness claims in Sections 2.3 and 3.4 depend on an unproven exclusion of B modes. That is a correctness or completeness risk, not a circularity, because it does not make either side of the gravity-CFT comparison an input to the other.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no free fitted parameters and no new entities. It relies on standard holographic background results, on the established identification of GMS geometries with spectral-flowed D1-D5 CFT states, and on prior CFT emission calculations whose conventions it translates. The only assumption that is specific to this paper's derivation is the technical δN << ε condition in the neck-region normalization, taken from the authors' earlier work [18].

assumptions (4)

domain assumption AdS3/CFT2 duality and the D1-D5 orbifold CFT description of the D1-D5 system
Section 3 assumes the standard holographic dictionary, including the identification of the GMS geometry with spectral-flowed states of the D1-D5 CFT, following prior work [27,29,41].
domain assumption The GMS microstate geometries are dual to the CFT states obtained by α = 2n+1 units of left spectral flow and ᾱ = 1 unit of right spectral flow on the NS vacuum
Invoked in Section 3.4 to set the spectral flow parameters and to translate the CFT spectrum into the gravity mode labels; this identification is taken from reference [27].
domain assumption The scalar emission vertex operator and the initial excited state of Avery, Chowdhury and Mathur [37] and Avery and Chowdhury [44] are correctly translated to the conventions of this paper and apply to the stable A modes
The CFT real and imaginary parts in Section 3 are read off from equations (8.4) and (8.6) of [37] and its higher-twist generalization [44], with only a change of angular momentum conventions (Section 3.2).
ad hoc to paper The matched asymptotic expansion assumes δN << ε for the Gamma-function pole deviation in the neck-region normalization
Explicitly assumed in Section 4.3 to drop δN from all Gamma function arguments when computing |C2|^2; the paper cites [18] for consistency. This assumption underlies the flux matching that yields equation (4.38).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasinormal modes of supersymmetric microstate geometries from the D1-D5 CFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R2DDQQVS

@misc{pith2026190801461,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasinormal modes of supersymmetric microstate geometries from the D1-D5 CFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R2DDQQVS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01461}
}

read the original abstract

We revisit the study of the probe scalar quasinormal modes of a class of three-charge supersymmetric microstate geometries. We compute the real and imaginary parts of the quasinormal modes and show that in the parameter range when the geometries have large AdS region, the spectrum is precisely reproduced from a D1-D5 orbifold CFT analysis. The spectrum includes the slow decaying modes pointed out by Eperon, Reall, and Santos. We analyse in detail the nature of the quasinormal modes by studying the scalar wavefunction. We show that these modes correspond to slow leakage of excitation from AdS throat to infinity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Cogito, ergo - strings: Supersymmetric ergoregions and their stringy excitations
hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Supersymmetric ergoregions without horizons in NS5-F1-P bound states are shown to admit negative-energy BPS excitations, described via gauged WZW models and mapped holographically to the dual CFT.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

AdS/CFT duality and the black h ole information paradox,

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “AdS/CFT duality and the black h ole information paradox,” Nucl. Phys. B 623, 342 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00620-4 [hep-th/ 0109154]. 33

doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00620-4 2002
[2]

The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An E lementary review,

S. D. Mathur, “The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An E lementary review,” Fortsch. Phys. 53, 793 (2005) doi:10.1002/prop.200410203 [hep-th/0502050 ]

arXiv 2005
[3]

Black holes, black rings and the ir microstates,

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “Black holes, black rings and the ir microstates,” Lect. Notes Phys. 755, 1 (2008) doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79523-0-1 [hep-th/0701 216]

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79523-0-1 2008
[4]

The fuzzball proposal for bl ack holes,

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “The fuzzball proposal for bl ack holes,” Phys. Rept. 467, 117 (2008) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.08.001 [arXiv:0804. 0552 [hep-th]]

doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.08.001 2008
[5]

Resolving the Structure of Blac k Holes: Philosophizing with a Hammer,

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “Resolving the Structure of Blac k Holes: Philosophizing with a Hammer,” arXiv:1311.4538 [hep-th]

arXiv
[6]

Dual geometries fo r a set of 3-charge microstates,

S. Giusto, S. D. Mathur and A. Saxena, “Dual geometries fo r a set of 3-charge microstates,” Nucl. Phys. B 701, 357 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.09.001 [hep-t h/0405017]

work page arXiv 2004
[7]

3-charge geometri es and their CFT duals,

S. Giusto, S. D. Mathur and A. Saxena, “3-charge geometri es and their CFT duals,” Nucl. Phys. B 710, 425 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.009 [hep-t h/0406103]

work page arXiv 2005
[8]

Geometry of D1-D5-P bound sta tes,

S. Giusto and S. D. Mathur, “Geometry of D1-D5-P bound sta tes,” Nucl. Phys. B 729, 203 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.09.037 [hep-th/04 09067]

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.09.037 2005

Show all 53 references

[9]

Constructi ng ‘hair’ for the three charge hole,

S. D. Mathur, A. Saxena and Y. K. Srivastava, “Constructi ng ‘hair’ for the three charge hole,” Nucl. Phys. B 680, 415 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.12.022 [hep-t h/0311092]

2004
[10]

Microstates at the boundary of AdS,

S. D. Mathur and D. Turton, “Microstates at the boundary of AdS,” JHEP 1205, 014 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2012)014 [arXiv:1112.6413 [hep-th] ]. S. D. Mathur and D. Turton, “Momentum-carrying waves on D1-D 5 microstate geometries,” Nucl. Phys. B 862, 764 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.n...

2012 arXiv
[11]

Adding momentum to supersymmetric geometries,

O. Lunin, S. D. Mathur and D. Turton, “Adding momentum to supersymmetric geometries,” Nucl. Phys. B 868, 383 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.11.017 [arXiv :1208.1770 [hep-th]]

2013 arXiv
[12]

6D micr ostate geometries from 10D struc- tures,

S. Giusto, L. Martucci, M. Petrini and R. Russo, “6D micr ostate geometries from 10D struc- tures,” Nucl. Phys. B 876, 509 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.08.018 [arXiv :1306.1745 [hep-th]]

2013 arXiv
[13]

Generalised Garﬁnkle- Vachaspati Transform With Dilaton,

S. Chakrabarti, D. Mishra, Y. K. Srivastava and A. Virma ni, “Generalised Garﬁnkle- Vachaspati Transform With Dilaton,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36, no. 12, 125008 (2019) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab1f18 [arXiv:1901.09048 [hep-t h]]. 34 D. Mishra, Y. K. Srivastava and A. Virmani, “A ge...

2019 arXiv
[14]

Non- supersymmetric smooth geometries and D1-D5-P bound states,

V. Jejjala, O. Madden, S. F. Ross and G. Titchener, “Non- supersymmetric smooth geometries and D1-D5-P bound states,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 124030 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.124030 [hep-th/0504181]

2005 arXiv
[15]

I nstability of non-supersymmetric smooth geometries,

V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, J. L. Hovdebo and R. C. Myers, “I nstability of non-supersymmetric smooth geometries,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 064031 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.064031 [hep- th/0512277]

2006
[16]

Radiation from the non -extremal fuzzball,

B. D. Chowdhury and S. D. Mathur, “Radiation from the non -extremal fuzzball,” Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 135005 (2008) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/13/135005 [arX iv:0711.4817 [hep-th]]

2008 arXiv
[17]

An Inv erse Scattering Construction of the JMaRT Fuzzball,

D. Katsimpouri, A. Kleinschmidt and A. Virmani, “An Inv erse Scattering Construction of the JMaRT Fuzzball,” JHEP 1412, 070 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)070 [arXiv:1409.64 71 [hep-th]]. B. Chakrabarty, J. V. Rocha and A. Virmani, “Smooth non-extr emal D1-D5-P solutions as ch...

2014 arXiv
[18]

Holographic description of non supersymmet- ric orbifolded D1-D5-P solutions,

B. Chakrabarty, D. Turton and A. Virmani, “Holographic description of non supersymmet- ric orbifolded D1-D5-P solutions,” JHEP 1511, 063 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)063 [arXiv:1508.01231 [hep-th]]

2015 arXiv
[19]

Instability o f supersymmetric microstate geome- tries,

F. C. Eperon, H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos, “Instability o f supersymmetric microstate geome- tries,” JHEP 1610, 031 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2016)031 [arXiv:1607.06 828 [hep-th]]

2016 doi
[20]

Geodesics in supersymmetric microstate geometries,

F. C. Eperon, “Geodesics in supersymmetric microstate geometries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34, no. 16, 165003 (2017) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa7bfe [arXi v:1702.03975 [gr-qc]]

2017 arXiv
[21]

Wave propagation on microstate geometries,

J. Keir, “Wave propagation on microstate geometries,” arXiv:1609.01733 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[22]

Evanescent ergosurface instability,

J. Keir, “Evanescent ergosurface instability,” arXiv :1810.03026 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[23]

A rough end for smooth m icrostate geometries,

D. Marolf, B. Michel and A. Puhm, “A rough end for smooth m icrostate geometries,” JHEP 05(2017)021 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)021 [arXiv:1612.0 5235 [hep-th]]. 35

2017 doi
[24]

Earl y Scrambling and Capped BTZ Geometries,

I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, R. Walker and N. P. Warner, “Earl y Scrambling and Capped BTZ Geometries,” JHEP 1904, 126 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)126 [arXiv:1812.05 110 [hep- th]]

2019 doi
[25]

Comments on black holes I: Th e possibility of complementarity,

S. D. Mathur and D. Turton, “Comments on black holes I: Th e possibility of complementarity,” JHEP 1401, 034 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)034 [arXiv:1208.20 05 [hep-th]]

2014 doi
[26]

Can we observe fuzzb alls or ﬁrewalls?,

B. Guo, S. Hampton and S. D. Mathur, “Can we observe fuzzb alls or ﬁrewalls?,” JHEP 1807, 162 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)162 [arXiv:1711.016 17 [hep-th]]

2018 doi
[27]

D1-D5-P microstates at the cap,

S. Giusto, O. Lunin, S. D. Mathur and D. Turton, “D1-D5-P microstates at the cap,” JHEP 1302, 050 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)050 [arXiv:1211.03 06 [hep-th]]

2013 doi
[28]

The Slowly rotating near extr emal D1 - D5 system as a ‘hot tube’,

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “The Slowly rotating near extr emal D1 - D5 system as a ‘hot tube’,” Nucl. Phys. B 615, 285 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00428-X [hep-th/ 0107113]

2001 doi
[29]

Microscopic form ulation of black holes in string theory,

J. R. David, G. Mandal and S. R. Wadia, “Microscopic form ulation of black holes in string theory,” Phys. Rept. 369, 549 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00271-5 [hep-th/ 0203048]

2002 doi
[30]

General rotating black holes i n string theory: Grey body fac- tors and event horizons,

M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, “General rotating black holes i n string theory: Grey body fac- tors and event horizons,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 4994 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.4994 [hep- th/9705192]

1997
[31]

All Supersy mmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in six-dimensions,

J. B. Gutowski, D. Martelli and H. S. Reall, “All Supersy mmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in six-dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 5049 (2003) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/20/23/008 [hep-th/0306235]

2003 arXiv
[32]

Global structure of ﬁve- dimensional fuzzballs,

G. W. Gibbons and N. P. Warner, “Global structure of ﬁve- dimensional fuzzballs,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 025016 (2014) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/2/025016 [arXi v:1305.0957 [hep- th]]

2014 arXiv
[33]

On the gravitat ional stability of D1-D5-P black holes,

V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias and R. C. Myers, “On the gravitat ional stability of D1-D5-P black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 105015 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.105015 [arXiv:0 707.3406 [hep-th]]

2007 doi
[34]

New approach to the quasino rmal modes of a black hole,

V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, “New approach to the quasino rmal modes of a black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 30, 295 (1984). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.295

1984 doi
[35]

Geodesic sta- bility, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes,

V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V. T. Zan chin, “Geodesic sta- bility, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes,” Phys. R ev. D 79, 064016 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064016 [arXiv:0812.1806 [hep- th]]. 36

2009 arXiv
[36]

Quasinormal-mode spectrum of Kerr black holes and its geometric interpretati on,

H. Yang, D. A. Nichols, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang a nd Y. Chen, “Quasinormal-mode spectrum of Kerr black holes and its geometric interpretati on,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 104006 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.104006 [arXiv:1207.4253 [gr-q c]]

2012 arXiv
[37]

Emission f rom the D1-D5 CFT,

S. G. Avery, B. D. Chowdhury and S. D. Mathur, “Emission f rom the D1-D5 CFT,” JHEP 0910, 065 (2009) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/065 [arXiv:0 906.2015 [hep-th]]

2009 doi
[38]

Pair creation in non-e xtremal fuzzball geometries,

B. D. Chowdhury and S. D. Mathur, “Pair creation in non-e xtremal fuzzball geometries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 225021 (2008) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/22/225021 [arX iv:0806.2309 [hep-th]]

2008 arXiv
[39]

Non-extremal fuzzbal ls and ergoregion emission,

B. D. Chowdhury and S. D. Mathur, “Non-extremal fuzzbal ls and ergoregion emission,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 035006 (2009) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/3/035006 [arXi v:0810.2951 [hep- th]]

2009 arXiv
[40]

Modave Lectures on Fuzz balls and Emission from the D1-D5 System,

B. D. Chowdhury and A. Virmani, “Modave Lectures on Fuzz balls and Emission from the D1-D5 System,” arXiv:1001.1444 [hep-th]

arXiv
[41]

Using the D1-D5 CFT to Understand Black Hol es,

S. G. Avery, “Using the D1-D5 CFT to Understand Black Hol es,” arXiv:1012.0072 [hep-th]

arXiv
[42]

Correlation functions for M* *N / S(N) orbifolds,

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “Correlation functions for M* *N / S(N) orbifolds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 219, 399 (2001) doi:10.1007/s002200100431 [hep-th/0006196]

2001 arXiv
[43]

Evaporation of large black holes in AdS: Co upling to the evaporon,

J. V. Rocha, “Evaporation of large black holes in AdS: Co upling to the evaporon,” JHEP 0808, 075 (2008) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/075 [arXiv:0 804.0055 [hep-th]]

2008 doi
[44]

Emission from the D1-D5 CFT: Higher Twists,

S. G. Avery and B. D. Chowdhury, “Emission from the D1-D5 CFT: Higher Twists,” JHEP 1001, 087 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)087 [arXiv:0907.16 63 [hep-th]]

2010 doi
[45]

Quasinormal m odes of black holes and black branes,

E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal m odes of black holes and black branes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 [arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]]

2009 arXiv
[46]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series, and products , Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2007, 7th Edition, ISBN: 978-0-12-37363 7-6; 0-12-373637-4

2007
[47]

Rotating Stars in R elativity,

V. Paschalidis and N. Stergioulas, “Rotating Stars in R elativity,” Living Rev. Rel. 20, no. 1, 7 (2017) doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0008-x [arXiv:1612.030 50 [astro-ph.HE]]

2017 doi
[48]

Probing Fuzzb alls with Particles, Waves and Strings,

M. Bianchi, D. Consoli and J. F. Morales, “Probing Fuzzb alls with Particles, Waves and Strings,” JHEP 1806, 157 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)157 [arXiv:1711.10 287 [hep-th]]. 37

2018 doi
[49]

The dark side of fuzzball geometries,

M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales, “The dark side of fuzzball geometries,” JHEP 1905, 126 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)126 [arXiv:1811.02 397 [hep-th]]

2019 doi
[50]

Accelerating str angelets via Penrose process in non- BPS fuzzballs,

M. Bianchi, M. Casolino and G. Rizzo, “Accelerating str angelets via Penrose process in non- BPS fuzzballs,” arXiv:1904.01097 [hep-th]

1904 arXiv
[51]

The Aretakis instability of extremal asymptotically AdS black holes

A. Ravishankar et al to appear. Talk at CMI Chennai July 2 019: “The Aretakis instability of extremal asymptotically AdS black holes”
[52]

Therma l Decay without Information Loss in Horizonless Microstate Geometries,

I. Bena, P. Heidmann, R. Monten and N. P. Warner, “Therma l Decay without Information Loss in Horizonless Microstate Geometries,” arXiv:1905.0 5194 [hep-th]

1905
[53]

A toy black hole S-matrix in th e D1-D5 CFT,

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “A toy black hole S-matrix in th e D1-D5 CFT,” JHEP 1302, 083 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)083 [arXiv:1211.5830 [h ep-th]]. 38

2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

AdS/CFT duality and the black h ole information paradox,

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “AdS/CFT duality and the black h ole information paradox,” Nucl. Phys. B 623, 342 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00620-4 [hep-th/ 0109154]. 33

doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00620-4 2002

[2] [2]

The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An E lementary review,

S. D. Mathur, “The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An E lementary review,” Fortsch. Phys. 53, 793 (2005) doi:10.1002/prop.200410203 [hep-th/0502050 ]

arXiv 2005

[3] [3]

Black holes, black rings and the ir microstates,

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “Black holes, black rings and the ir microstates,” Lect. Notes Phys. 755, 1 (2008) doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79523-0-1 [hep-th/0701 216]

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79523-0-1 2008

[4] [4]

The fuzzball proposal for bl ack holes,

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “The fuzzball proposal for bl ack holes,” Phys. Rept. 467, 117 (2008) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.08.001 [arXiv:0804. 0552 [hep-th]]

doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.08.001 2008

[5] [5]

Resolving the Structure of Blac k Holes: Philosophizing with a Hammer,

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “Resolving the Structure of Blac k Holes: Philosophizing with a Hammer,” arXiv:1311.4538 [hep-th]

arXiv

[6] [6]

Dual geometries fo r a set of 3-charge microstates,

S. Giusto, S. D. Mathur and A. Saxena, “Dual geometries fo r a set of 3-charge microstates,” Nucl. Phys. B 701, 357 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.09.001 [hep-t h/0405017]

work page arXiv 2004

[7] [7]

3-charge geometri es and their CFT duals,

S. Giusto, S. D. Mathur and A. Saxena, “3-charge geometri es and their CFT duals,” Nucl. Phys. B 710, 425 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.009 [hep-t h/0406103]

work page arXiv 2005

[8] [8]

Geometry of D1-D5-P bound sta tes,

S. Giusto and S. D. Mathur, “Geometry of D1-D5-P bound sta tes,” Nucl. Phys. B 729, 203 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.09.037 [hep-th/04 09067]

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.09.037 2005