Recovering the cosmological constant from affine geometry

Salvatore Capozziello; Wladimir-Georges Boskoff

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Recovering the cosmological constant from affine geometry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The cosmological constant reduces to a volume-preserving affine invariant of de Sitter spacetime.

desk verdict Correct Tzitzeica computation for de Sitter hyperboloids, but the 'recovery' of Lambda is a definitional restatement with a free radius and an origin-dependent ratio, not a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02340 v2 pith:FNQMNVD7 submitted 2019-08-06 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Wladimir-Georges Boskoff , Salvatore Capozziello This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th MSC 83C4083C0583C10

keywords cosmologicalconstantaffinegeometryMinkowskispacetimedeSitterMinkowski-TzitzeicasurfacesinvariantvolumepreservationvacuumEinsteinequations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the cosmological constant does not have to be put into Einstein's equations by hand, at least for vacuum de Sitter spacetime. It constructs a gravitational potential from the Minkowski geometry of spacelike vectors alone, with no masses or matter entering, and shows that the constant-potential surfaces are affine spacelike spheres, the $(n-1)$-dimensional de Sitter hyperboloids. On these surfaces the ratio of the Minkowski Gauss curvature to the $(n+1)$-th power of the distance to the tangent plane is constant, and the paper proves that this invariant, up to its $n$-th root, is exactly $1/a^2$. Substituting that into the vacuum Einstein equations gives $\Lambda = -\frac{(n-2)(n-3)}{2}\left|K/d^{n+1}\right|^{1/n}$, so the cosmological constant is recovered from affine geometry and its nature is tied to volume preservation. If true, this gives a purely geometric origin for $\Lambda$ and reframes the cosmological constant problem as a question about affine invariants rather than vacuum energy alone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Minkowski-Tzitzeica affine radius, the ratio $K^M_f(p)/(d^M_f(p))^{n+1}$ formed from the Gauss-Minkowski curvature $K^M_f$ of a hypersurface and the Minkowski distance $d^M_f$ from the origin to its tangent hyperplane at $p$. This ratio is preserved, up to a factor $1/(\det A)^2$, under centro-affine transformations, so its $n$-th root is an affine invariant with dimensions of inverse length squared. For the de Sitter hyperboloid the normal vector is $N=f/a$, which makes $d^M_f=a$ and $K^M_f=-1/a^{n-1}$; hence the ratio collapses to $-1/a^{2n}$. The paper's recursive parametrization $ds^2_{n-1}=a^2\cos^2 x_{n-2}\,ds^2_{n-2}-a^2 dx^2_{n-2}$ turns the curvature computation into a repeated application of the same formula, which is what allows the invariant to be identified as the single geometric source of $\Lambda$.

What would settle it

Compute $K^M_f$ and $d^M_f$ at several points of a de Sitter hyperboloid using a different parametrization and check whether $|K^M_f|/(d^M_f)^{n+1}$ equals $1/a^{2n}$ to numerical precision; a mismatch would break the central identity. Alternatively, a vacuum Einstein spacetime with constant sectional curvature but a different affine-invariant ratio would show that $\Lambda$ is not uniquely recovered from the invariant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: for every spacetime dimension $n\ge 3$, the $(n-1)$-de Sitter spacetime is the Minkowski spacelike sphere $X_0^2-X_1^2-\cdots-X_{n-1}^2=-a^2$. The paper shows this hypersurface is a Minkowski-Tzitzeica affine sphere: its Gauss-Minkowski curvature and Minkowski distance to the tangent hyperplane satisfy $K^M_f/(d^M_f)^{n+1}=-1/a^{2n}$. The $n$-th root of the absolute value is $1/a^2$, and the vacuum Einstein equations $R_{ij}-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{ij}+\Lambda g_{ij}=0$ are solved with $R=-(n-1)(n-2)/a^2$ and $\Lambda=-\frac{(n-2)(n-3)}{2}(1/a^2)$. Combining these, $\Lambda$ is expressed entirely through the affine invariant, so the cosmological constant, the Ricci scalar, and the coefficient in $R_{ij}+\frac{n-2}{a^2}g_{ij}=0$ all descend from one centro-affine invariant, which the paper identifies with volume preservation.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the spacetime is exactly the hyperboloid $X_0^2-\sum X_i^2=-a^2$ and takes its radius $a$ as an input; the affine invariant then fixes $\Lambda$ in terms of $a$, but $a$ itself is not derived from affine geometry.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In four dimensions ($n=4$) the formula gives $\Lambda=-1/a^2$, so the de Sitter vacuum requires no matter and its cosmological constant is fixed once the hyperboloid radius is fixed.
In three dimensions ($n=3$) the same machinery yields $\Lambda=0$, consistent with the vacuum equations for $2+1$ gravity, and the affine invariant still determines the curvature scale.
All vacuum de Sitter solutions in any $n\ge 3$ share one affine invariant, and the $n$-th root of that invariant replaces the combination $1/a^2$ in $R$, $\Lambda$, and $R_{ij}$.
Because the invariant is centro-affine and connected to volume preservation, any coordinate or affine transformation preserving the invariant leaves $\Lambda$ unchanged.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the paper is right, $\Lambda$ can be removed from the list of fundamental constants of vacuum gravity and replaced by a geometric boundary datum describing how the vacuum hypersurface is embedded in the ambient Minkowski space.
One could test the same invariant on anti-de Sitter or other constant-curvature slicings; the paper does not do this, but the same ratio criterion would tell whether their cosmological constants also have an affine-geometric meaning.
Observational limits on $\Lambda$ could be translated into a measurement of the affine radius $a$, giving a geometric length scale for dark energy; this interpretation goes beyond the paper's classical, non-quantum scope.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The honest summary: this paper shows that the (n-1)-dimensional de Sitter hyperboloid in Minkowski n-space is a Minkowski-Tzitzeica affine sphere, with the affine invariant K/(d^(n+1)) = -1/a^(2n). The curvature computations are explicit, mostly correct, and the recursive parametrization is a tidy way to present the standard metric. I believe that part. What I don't believe is the headline claim that this recovers the cosmological constant from affine geometry. The invariant is computed for the surface and returns exactly 1/a^2, where a is the free radius of the hyperboloid. The Lambda relation (7.7) is the textbook Lambda = -(n-2)(n-3)/(2a^2) with 1/a^2 rewritten as the n-th root of the ratio. Since the ratio is constructed from the embedding and the origin, it is not a spacetime invariant: translate the hyperboloid in the ambient Minkowski space and the metric is unchanged but the tangent-plane distance d changes, so the ratio changes. The same de Sitter spacetime gets different affine radii depending on the chosen origin. So the derivation is forced by two external inputs: a and the origin. The paper does concede it is classical and does not address the cosmological constant problem, which is fair. But 'fully recovered from affine geometry' is an overstatement. The correct statement is: if you already know the embedding radius a, the Tzitzeica ratio reproduces 1/a^2. That is a reformulation, not a derivation.

The softest part is the interpretive leap in Section 7. Sections 2-5 are mostly definitions and invariant computations, fine for a geometry note. The references are appropriate, though the key Minkowski-Tzitzeica extension is self-cited [27]; that's fine since the computation is explicit here.

Who is this for? Someone interested in affine sphere characterizations of de Sitter space might find the explicit Tzitzeica verification useful. A cosmologist hoping for a new route to Lambda will be disappointed. It deserves a serious referee because the geometric claim is checkable and the overclaim is a matter of interpretation, but I'd recommend major revision to reframe the conclusion, or reject if the authors insist on the 'recovery' language.

Candidly, I'd be surprised if this ends up as a physics result, but it's a legitimate geometry observation.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'Minkowski geometric gravity' in which a potential Φ_M = -1/r^{n-2} on the spacelike region of a Minkowski space defines a gravitational force and field. It then identifies the (n-1)-dimensional de Sitter hyperboloid X_0^2 - Σ X_i^2 = -a^2 with an affine spacelike sphere and computes the Minkowski-Tzitzeica ratio K_M^f/(d_M^f)^{n+1} = -1/a^{2n}. Taking the n-th root gives 1/a^2, which is substituted into the standard formula Λ = -(n-2)(n-3)/(2a^2). The paper concludes that the cosmological constant can be 'fully recovered' from affine geometry arguments and that its nature is related to volume preservation.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, the paper would provide a purely geometric origin for the cosmological constant in vacuum de Sitter spacetimes, which would be a notable result. The manuscript does contain explicit and largely correct computations for n = 3, 4, 5, and general n, and the recursive parametrization of the de Sitter hyperboloid is a useful presentation. The identification of the standard hyperboloid as a Minkowski-Tzitzeica hypersurface is a valid observation within the chosen framework. However, the claim that Λ is 'recovered' from affine geometry is not supported: as detailed below, the derivation is an identity that merely restates the free parameter a, and the invariant used is not intrinsic to the spacetime. The paper's strength is its explicit algebra; its weakness is the interpretive leap in the conclusions.

major comments (3)

[Section 6, Eqs. (6.58), (7.6)-(7.7)] The derivation of Λ reduces to an identity. The authors compute K_M^f = -1/a^{n-1} and d_M^f = a from the parametrization (6.39)-(6.40), so K_M^f/(d_M^f)^{n+1} = -1/a^{2n} by construction. Taking the n-th root and substituting into Eq. (7.7) recovers the standard relation Λ = -(n-2)(n-3)/(2a^2) with the same free parameter a. No independent principle fixes a, so the claim that Λ is 'generated' or 'fully recovered' from affine geometry is a restatement of the input rather than a derivation.
[Section 3, Eq. (3.7); Section 6, Eq. (6.58)] The Tzitzeica ratio is not an invariant of the de Sitter spacetime itself because the distance d_M^f is measured from a fixed origin in the ambient Minkowski space. A translation of the hyperboloid (6.39) by a constant vector c produces an isometric hypersurface with the same induced metric and the same intrinsic curvature, but the tangent-plane distance becomes |⟨c,N⟩ - a|, which varies over the hypersurface for c ≠ 0 while K_M^f is unchanged. Hence the ratio K/(d^{n+1}) is not constant for the translated surface, showing that the invariant depends on the ambient origin and is only centro-affine (origin-fixing), not generally affine. The conclusion that Λ is recovered from 'affine geometry' is therefore not justified.
[Section 7, final paragraph] The statement that 'the nature of cosmological constant is related to the property of volume preservation' is not supported by the arguments. The centro-affine invariance of the Tzitzeica ratio under maps with det A = 1 is a statement about volume preservation in the ambient space, but the formula (7.7) merely expresses Λ in terms of the radius a; it does not establish that volume preservation is the physical origin of Λ.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (2.10)] The displayed second derivatives of Φ_M are algebraically incorrect for general n; for example, the coefficient of (x0-b0)^2 should be -n(n-2), not n, and similarly for the spatial terms. The stated Theorem 2 is nevertheless true when the derivatives are computed correctly, so the error is in the displayed formula rather than the conclusion.
[Title and Section 6] The title contains a spacing error ('CONST ANT'), and the name 'Tzitzeica' is misspelled as 'Tzizeica' in Section 6 (e.g., Eq. (6.26)).
[Section 6, Eqs. (6.40) and (7.1)] The parametrization (6.40) is introduced as valid for n ≥ 5, while the recursive formula (7.1) is stated for n ≥ 4; please clarify the domain of each formula and the base case.
[Section 2] The 'Minkowski geometric gravitational force' is introduced by definition; the paper would benefit from a discussion of why this specific form is natural, beyond the dimensional analysis.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The Λ recovery is a definitional renaming: the Tzitzeica ratio is set equal to 1/a^2 by the chosen origin-centered hyperboloid, so Eq. (7.7) just restates the standard de Sitter formula with the input radius a.

renaming known result [Sec. 6, Eqs. (6.39), (6.48), (6.58); Sec. 7, Eqs. (7.5)-(7.7)]
"Therefore the Minkowski normal to the hypersurface is N (t, x1, ..., xn−2) = 1/a f (t, x1, ..., xn−2), that is the Minkowski distance from the origin to the tangent hyperplane at a given point of the hypersurface is a ... K M f := − det hij/ det gij = − 1/an−1 ; dM f := a. ... K M f (p)/(dM f (p))n+1 = − 1/a2n , ... Λ = − (n−2)(n−3)/2 n√(| K M f (p)/(dM f (p))n+1 |)."

Eqs. (6.58) and (7.6) give the Tzitzeica ratio identically as −1/a^{2n}; the nth root in Eq. (7.7) is 1/a^2, so Eq. (7.7) is exactly the standard de Sitter formula Eq. (7.5) with a put in by hand as the radius of the hyperboloid (6.39). No argument fixes a; it is the same free parameter that already determines Λ. The 'affine geometry' ratio is not an independent spacetime invariant: it is defined relative to the chosen origin (N = f/a, d = a), and translating the hyperboloid leaves the metric unchanged but changes d, hence changes the ratio. Therefore the claimed 'recovery' is a restatement of 1/a^2 in new coordinates, not a derivation of Λ.

full rationale

Score 8 rather than 0 because the central claim is not an independent derivation: the stated result Λ = −((n−2)(n−3)/2)·[K/(d^{n+1})]^{1/n} is equivalent to substituting the chosen hyperboloid radius a. The paper's internal computations are consistent, but the presented 'geometric generation' of Λ is a definitional rearrangement of the standard relation Λ = −(n−2)(n−3)/(2a^2). The ratio's nth root equals 1/a^2 only because d_M^f is set to a and K_M^f to −1/a^{n−1} for the origin-centered hyperboloid; both facts are directly tied to the same a. The conclusion that the cosmological constant is 'fully recovered' from affine geometry is therefore not supported; at most one can say the Tzitzeica invariant provides an equivalent bookkeeping of the existing de Sitter radius. No self-citation is load-bearing here; the issue is the definitional reduction of the central formula. Hence 8.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central relation rests on an arbitrary radius a and on a definitional invariant. The Minkowski potential and Tzitzeica invariant are stipulated, not derived from independent principles, and the paper provides no falsifiable handle outside the chosen hyperboloid.

free parameters (1)

de Sitter radius a
The hyperboloid X0^2 - sum Xi^2 = -a^2 depends on a; Lambda and R are expressed in terms of a, but a is not derived. It is the single scale that determines Lambda.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The vacuum Einstein equations with T_ij = 0 are the equations the spacetime must satisfy.
The claim that the hyperboloid satisfies Einstein equations assumes the standard field equations (1.1) as the physical target.
ad hoc to paper The Minkowski potential Phi_M = -1/r^(n-2) and related field are stipulated as the geometric gravity theory.
No physical dynamics or Lagrangian is given; these objects are introduced in Sec. 2 to link the hyperboloid to a potential.
standard math The Tzitzeica ratio in Minkowski spaces transforms as stated and is the relevant affine invariant.
Taken from [27], mostly self-cited, and extended to n dimensions; no independent verification is provided.

invented entities (2)

Minkowski geometric gravitational force, field, and potential (F_M, A_M, Phi_M)
purpose: To describe the de Sitter hyperboloid as a constant-potential surface without mass sources.
These are mathematical definitions in Sec. 2 with no observable consequences or falsifiable predictions.
Minkowski-Tzitzeica affine radius as the origin of Lambda
purpose: To reinterpret the cosmological constant as a volume-preservation invariant.
The invariant is computed from the same hyperboloid and reduces to 1/a^2; it does not determine Lambda independently.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recovering the cosmological constant from affine geometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNQMNVD7

@misc{pith2026190802340,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recovering the cosmological constant from affine geometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNQMNVD7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02340}
}

abstract

A gravity theory without masses can be constructed in Minkowski spaces using a geometric Minkowski potential. The related affine spacelike spheres can be seen as the regions of the Minkowski spacelike vectors characterized by a constant Minkowski gravitational potential. These spheres point out, for each dimension $n \geq 3$, spacetime models, the de Sitter ones, which satisfy Einstein's field equations in absence of matter. In other words, it is possible to generate geometrically the cosmological constant. Even if a lot of possible parameterizations have been proposed, each one highlighting some geometric and physical properties of the de Sitter space, we present here a new natural parameterization which reveals the intrinsic geometric nature of cosmological constant relating it with the invariant affine radius coming from the so called Minkowski-Tzitzeica surfaces theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Emergent metric and geodesic analysis in cosmological solutions of (torsion-free) Polynomial Affine Gravity
gr-qc 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

In torsion-free polynomial affine gravity, the Ricci tensor can serve as an emergent metric, and self-parallel curves can reproduce the spatial geodesics of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[27]

E. Pancini

A. Bobe, W. G. Boskoﬀ and M. G. Ciuca, Tzitzeica-type centro-aﬃne invariants in Minkowski space s, An. Stiint. Univ. Ovidius Constanta Ser. Mat. 20 (2) (2012) 27. Department of Mathematics Ovidius University of Constanta, 900527, Constanta, Roman ia E-mail address : boskoff@univ-ovidius.ro RECOVERING THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT FROM AFFINE GEOMETRY 17 Dipar...

work page 2012
[1]

Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev

S. Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 1

work page 1989
[2]

Luongo and M

O. Luongo and M. Muccino, Speeding up the universe using dust with pressure, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 103520

work page 2018
[3]

Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask) , Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (2012) 566

J. Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask) , Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (2012) 566

work page 2012
[4]

Capozziello and M

S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia, Extended Theories of Gravity and their Cosmological and Ast rophysical Appli- cations, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 357

work page 2008
[5]

Capozziello, R

S. Capozziello, R. D’Agostino, O. Luongo, Extended Gravity Cosmography , Int. Jou. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2019) 1930016

work page 2019
[6]

Demianski, E

M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, C. Rubano and P. Scudella ro, High redshift cosmography: new results and impli- cation for dark energy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426 (2012) 1396

work page 2012
[7]

P. K. S. Dunsby, and O. Luongo, On the theory and applications of modern cosmography , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1630002

work page 2016

Show all 27 references

[8]

Capozziello, M

S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, O. Luongo, A. Ruggeri, Cosmographic Constraints and Cosmic Fluids , Galaxies 1 (2013) 216

2013
[9]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Introduction to modiﬁed gravity and gravitational alterna tive for dark energy, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 4 (2007) 115

2007
[10]

Capozziello, V

S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone and A. Troisi, Dark energy and dark matter as curvature eﬀects, JCAP 0608 (2006) 001

2006
[11]

Capozziello and M

S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Extended Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rept. 509 (2011) 167

2011
[12]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Modiﬁed Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inﬂation, Bounce an d Late-time Evolution Phys. Rept. 692 (2017) 1

2017
[13]

Coxeter, A Geometrical Background for De Sitter’s World , The American Mathematical Monthly, 50 (1943) 217

H.S.M. Coxeter, A Geometrical Background for De Sitter’s World , The American Mathematical Monthly, 50 (1943) 217

1943
[14]

T.Hartman, Lecture Notes on Classical de Sitter Space , www.harmanhep.net/GR2017/desitter-lectures-v2.pdf (2017)

2017
[15]

Hawking, G.F.R

S.W. Hawking, G.F.R. Ellis, Large Scale Structure of Space-Time , Cambridge University Press, (1973) Cambridge

1973
[16]

Spradlin, A

M. Spradlin, A. Strominger, A. Volovich, Les Houches Lectures on de Sitter Space , arXiv: hep-th/0110007 (2001)

2001 arXiv
[17]

Burke, Spacetime, Geometry, Cosmology , University Science Books, (1980) Mill Valley

W. Burke, Spacetime, Geometry, Cosmology , University Science Books, (1980) Mill Valley

1980
[18]

Callahan, The Geometry of Spacetime: Special and General Relativity , Springer, (2000) New York

J. Callahan, The Geometry of Spacetime: Special and General Relativity , Springer, (2000) New York

2000
[19]

Moore, A General Relativity Workbook , University Science Books, (2013) Mill Valley

T. Moore, A General Relativity Workbook , University Science Books, (2013) Mill Valley

2013
[20]

Tzitzeica, Sur une nouvelle classe de surfaces , Les Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des sciences, 144 (1907) 1257

G. Tzitzeica, Sur une nouvelle classe de surfaces , Les Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des sciences, 144 (1907) 1257

1907
[21]

Tzitzeica, Sur une nouvelle classe de surfaces (la deuxième partie) , Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 28 (1909) 210

G. Tzitzeica, Sur une nouvelle classe de surfaces (la deuxième partie) , Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 28 (1909) 210

1909
[22]

Calabi, Complete Aﬃne Hyperspheres, I., Symposia Mathematica, Vol.X (Convegno di Geometria Diﬀere nziale, INDAM, Rome, 1971), 19-38

E. Calabi, Complete Aﬃne Hyperspheres, I., Symposia Mathematica, Vol.X (Convegno di Geometria Diﬀere nziale, INDAM, Rome, 1971), 19-38. Academic Press, (1972) London

1972
[23]

Nomizu and T

K. Nomizu and T. Sasaki, Aﬃne Diﬀerential Geometry , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, (1994) Cambridge

1994
[24]

A.Agnew, A.Bobe, W.G.Boskoﬀ, L.Homentcovschi, B.Suc eava, The equation of the Euler’s line yields a Tzitzeica surface , Elem. Math. 64 (2009) 71

2009
[25]

W. G. Boskoﬀ, M. Crasmareanu and L.-I. Piscoran, Tzitzeica equations and Tzitzeica surfaces in separable coordinate systems and the Ricci ﬂow tensor ﬁeld , Carpathian J. Math. 33 (2) (2017) 141

2017
[26]

Lopez, Diﬀerential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces in Lorentz-Min kowski space, arXiv: 0810.3351 (2008)

R. Lopez, Diﬀerential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces in Lorentz-Min kowski space, arXiv: 0810.3351 (2008)

2008 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [27]

E. Pancini

A. Bobe, W. G. Boskoﬀ and M. G. Ciuca, Tzitzeica-type centro-aﬃne invariants in Minkowski space s, An. Stiint. Univ. Ovidius Constanta Ser. Mat. 20 (2) (2012) 27. Department of Mathematics Ovidius University of Constanta, 900527, Constanta, Roman ia E-mail address : boskoff@univ-ovidius.ro RECOVERING THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT FROM AFFINE GEOMETRY 17 Dipar...

work page 2012

[2] [1]

Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev

S. Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 1

work page 1989

[3] [2]

Luongo and M

O. Luongo and M. Muccino, Speeding up the universe using dust with pressure, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 103520

work page 2018

[4] [3]

Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask) , Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (2012) 566

J. Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask) , Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (2012) 566

work page 2012

[5] [4]

Capozziello and M

S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia, Extended Theories of Gravity and their Cosmological and Ast rophysical Appli- cations, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 357

work page 2008

[6] [5]

Capozziello, R

S. Capozziello, R. D’Agostino, O. Luongo, Extended Gravity Cosmography , Int. Jou. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2019) 1930016

work page 2019

[7] [6]

Demianski, E

M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, C. Rubano and P. Scudella ro, High redshift cosmography: new results and impli- cation for dark energy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426 (2012) 1396

work page 2012

[8] [7]

P. K. S. Dunsby, and O. Luongo, On the theory and applications of modern cosmography , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1630002

work page 2016