Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 99 references

Review of opportunities at the HESR-Collider with PANDA at FAIR

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A proposed $\bar p p$ collider at FAIR would yield $10^6$ bottom pairs a year and open heavy-flavor spectroscopy.

desk verdict A well-organized white paper for a pbar-p collider at HESR whose flagship rate estimate hinges on an unpublished b-bbar cross section; referee-worthy but conditional on that input being made public. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02346 v2 pith:GR7472R5 submitted 2019-08-06 nucl-th hep-phnucl-ex

Leonid Frankfurt , Mark Strikman , Alexei Larionov , Andreas Lehrach , Rudolf Maier , Hendrik van Hees , Christian Spieles , Volodymyr Vovchenko
show 1 more author
Horst Stoecker
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-phnucl-ex
keywords antiproton-protoncollisionsheavy-flavorproductionPANDAdetectorHESRcollidermodedouble-heavybaryonsshort-rangecorrelationspure-glueplasmaFAIR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the PANDA detector at FAIR, designed for fixed-target antiproton physics, can serve without modification as a midrapidity detector in a future collider mode of the HESR ring, HESR-C, in which antiprotons collide with protons and nuclei at center-of-mass energies up to $\sqrt{s}=30$ GeV. At a conservative luminosity of $4\times10^{30}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ for $10^7$ seconds, the authors estimate yearly yields of $10^6$ $b\bar b$ pairs, $10^9$ $c\bar c$ pairs, and $10^6$ double-charm pair events. They argue these rates would turn the experiment into a discovery tool for excited open heavy-flavor mesons and baryons, double-heavy baryons, and nuclear fragments bound with charm quarks, where present data are thin. The same collider, in the paper's view, would open a broader QCD program on short-range correlations in nuclei, color fluctuations, Drell-Yan dileptons, and the possible formation of an initially quark-free gluon plasma.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the valence-quark--valence-antiquark annihilation channel $q\bar q\to Q\bar Q$, which is present in $\bar p p$ but absent in $pp$ and makes bottom-pair production roughly seven times larger in $\bar p p$ at these energies; for two heavy pairs the paper invokes double parton scattering, using a $10^{-3}$ ratio of double- to single-charm-pair production fixed by an effective cross section $\sigma_{\rm eff}=30$ mb. This mechanism converts modest cross sections ($\sigma_{b\bar b}=1.8\times10^{-2}$ $\mu$b, $\sigma_{c\bar c}=30$ $\mu$b) into discovery samples because the heavy quarks are produced close to threshold, with large light-cone fractions and low relative velocities, so coalescence with valence (anti)quarks can build excited mesons, baryons, and multiquark states.

What would settle it

Measure $\bar p p\to b\bar b$ near $\sqrt{s}=30$ GeV in a dedicated run (for instance using the same HESR ring in a fixed-target or low-luminosity mode) and compare with $1.8\times10^{-2}$ $\mu$b; a result below roughly $2\times10^{-3}$ $\mu$b would undercut the yearly yield of $10^6$ $b\bar b$ events on which the bottom-quark program rests.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At $\sqrt{s}=30$ GeV and $L=4\times10^{30}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$, antiproton-proton annihilation is dominated near threshold by valence-quark--valence-antiquark processes, and the paper's central quantitative claim is that one year of running produces $N_{b\bar b}=10^6$, $N_{c\bar c}=10^9$, and $N_{c\bar c,c\bar c}=10^6$ events. With those samples, the paper claims, PANDA at HESR-C could discover and study the excited $b\bar q$ and $bqq$ states, analogs of the $X,Y,Z$ charmonia built from $b$ quarks, double-heavy baryons such as $ccq$, $bcq$, and possibly $bbq$, and nuclear bound states containing heavy quarks, because heavy pairs are produced with small invariant masses and low relative velocities that favor coalescence rather than fragmentation. It further claims the detector layout needs no forward-arm replacement: two-directional injection switches plus a new proton beam line from SIS18 are enough to make PANDA a midrapidity collider detector.

Load-bearing premise

The rate program stands on the assumption, taken from a private communication rather than a published calculation, that $\sigma_{b\bar b}(30\,\text{GeV})=1.8\times10^{-2}$ $\mu$b; if the true cross section were an order of magnitude smaller, the flagship million-pair bottom program would lose most of its discovery power.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One year at $4\times10^{30}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ yields $10^6$ $b\bar b$, $10^9$ $c\bar c$, and $10^6$ $c\bar c c\bar c$ events, and all rates scale linearly with luminosity.
  • Excited open-bottom mesons and baryons, currently known only in tiny numbers, become accessible for spectroscopy, including tests of the heavy-quark limit.
  • The $c\bar c c\bar c$ sample gives a realistic path to $ccq$ and $bcq$ baryons and to double-charmonium final states.
  • The same machine can search for charm-bearing nuclear fragments and, in $\bar p A$ mode, probe short-range correlations with exclusive final states.
  • PANDA can be repurposed as a midrapidity detector with only a new proton beam line and two injection switches, so the fixed-target forward spectrometer remains useful for both beam directions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not in the paper: a precise measurement of the $c\bar c c\bar c$ final states would also constrain three-dimensional parton correlations in the nucleon, since the double parton scattering rate is inversely proportional to the square of the average valence-quark separation.
  • If the quoted $\sigma_{b\bar b}$ is confirmed, HESR-C would offer a near-threshold bottom sample that is complementary to LHC data, where $b$ quarks come from gluon splitting and fragmentation; the comparison could isolate the role of valence-antiquark annihilation in heavy-flavor hadronization.
  • The pure-glue initial-state scenario implies a long mixed-phase dwell for $\tau_*\sim5$ fm/$c$; a testable extension would be a dedicated scan of low-mass dilepton and photon spectra in $\bar p p$ events selected for low net baryon number at midrapidity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a physics-opportunities review for using the PANDA detector as an unmodified midrapidity detector in a future HESR collider mode (HESR-C) at FAIR, with proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt(s) up to 30 GeV. It presents rate estimates for heavy-flavor production (Eqs. 1-4): with L = 4e30 cm^-2 s^-1 for 1e7 s, the authors predict 1e6 b-bbar pairs, 1e9 c-cbar pairs, and 1e6 double-charm events per year, and on this basis argue for programs in excited open-heavy-flavor spectroscopy, double-heavy baryons and mesons, and heavy-quark nuclear bound states. Further sections survey elastic scattering and odderon studies, short-range correlations in nuclei, Drell-Yan and dilepton production, and a pure-glue initial-state scenario for pp annihilation illustrated by (2+1)-dimensional ideal hydrodynamic simulations with a time-dependent equation of state interpolating between pure Yang-Mills and full QCD lattice results. The paper concludes that the HESR-C collider can be realized with modest accelerator additions and an essentially unmodified PANDA detector.

Significance. If the rate estimates hold, the proposal would open a genuinely new kinematic window: heavy-quark pair production near threshold in pp annihilation, with much lower combinatorial background than at the LHC, and the possibility of discovering excited B mesons, double-heavy baryons, and heavy-quark bound states in nuclei. The paper's quantitative core is simple and transparent (Eqs. 1-4 scale linearly with luminosity), uses external lattice QCD equations of state and the public vHLLE hydrodynamics code, and the authors explicitly label the hydro part as schematic. These are strengths. However, the flagship bottom-quark program rests on a single cross-section value (Eq. 1) attributed to private communications, and the discovery claims are not matched with detector efficiency or background estimates; these gaps must be addressed before the proposal can be evaluated as a firm physics case.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (1)] The entire bottom-quark program is built on sigma_bb(sqrt(s)=30 GeV) = 1.8e-2 microbarn, attributed to Ref. [20], which is 'private communications'. The text states the calculation is still 'being validated' at high energies, so at the 30 GeV scale relevant to HESR-C it has no public derivation or data anchor. Because the advertised N_bb = 1e6 per year (Eq. 3) scales linearly with this cross section, a factor of 5-10 uncertainty would reduce the excited-B and double-heavy-baryon yields to 1e5-2e5 per year and change the statistical case materially. Please provide a publicly checkable derivation or a direct low-energy data normalization, or, failing that, present the rate estimates as an explicit sensitivity scan over sigma_bb with the private value as one reference point.
  2. [Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 3.3] The rate estimates in Eqs. (3)-(4) are raw production rates and do not include PANDA acceptance, reconstruction efficiency, trigger efficiency, or combinatorial backgrounds. The paper's central claim is that PANDA can serve as an unmodified midrapidity detector, and the discovery arguments for excited open-bottom states and double-heavy baryons depend on reconstructing specific final states (e.g., displaced vertices, low-pT heavy mesons) in a hadronic environment. Without at least a rough estimate of the visible cross sections after acceptance and of the signal-to-background ratio for representative channels, the statements that these states are 'possible to discover and study' (Sec. 3.4) go beyond what Eqs. (1)-(4) support.
  3. [Sec. 5.5] The pure-glue scenario is presented as an opportunity, but the supporting hydro simulation is, by the authors' own description, schematic: ideal hydrodynamics, a hand-entered chemical-equilibration function (Eq. 17), and a hard-sphere initial state with R=0.6 fm and T0=273 MeV chosen by Bjorken-model estimates. The output shown (Fig. 4) is the central-cell temperature trajectory, not a measurable observable. The conclusion that 'significant effects ... are expected' is therefore not yet tied to a concrete prediction (e.g., dilepton spectra, multiplicity, or identified-hadron ratios) that PANDA could test. I recommend either adding a detector-level or at least a final-state observable estimate, or explicitly reframing this section as a qualitative conjecture rather than a result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 2.2] The abstract quotes L ~ 10^31 cm^-2 s^-1, while Sec. 2.2 uses a 'conservative' startup luminosity of 4e30 cm^-2 s^-1; please make the luminosity convention consistent throughout.
  2. [Footnote 1 and Ref. [1]] The paper states in footnote 1 that it is based on Ref. [1], an article to be published in the FIAS series; please clarify the relation to that article and ensure that the present submission is sufficiently distinct or that appropriate overlap permission is documented.
  3. [Eq. (17)] The parameter tau_0 appears in Eq. (17) but is not defined in the text; please specify the initialization proper time used in the hydro calculation.
  4. [Sec. 2.1] The phrase 'tt-production cross sections' appears to be a typo; the context is heavy-quark pair production, not top-quark production at these energies.
  5. [Sec. 3.3] The formatting of event counts such as '10 3 events' and '10 2 events' is inconsistent; please use uniform superscript notation throughout.
  6. [Ref. [20]] Reference [20] lists only 'private communications'; if retained, include the date and a statement of permission, and ideally a link to a public write-up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the rate estimates are arithmetic on externally quoted cross sections, and the hydro section is an explicitly labeled schematic illustration.

full rationale

The central quantitative claims in Secs. 2.1 and 2.2 are obtained by multiplying externally supplied cross sections by an assumed luminosity and running time: Eq. (1) quotes a calculation communicated privately by Cacciari and Vogt, and Eq. (2) quotes existing data for charm production. Neither quantity is fitted within this paper to the quantity it then 'predicts,' so the N_bb and N_cc numbers are arithmetic consequences of external inputs rather than self-referential derivations. The double-charm estimate in Sec. 3.3 similarly uses a suppression factor borrowed from Tevatron double-parton-scattering studies, not from this paper's own outputs. The pure-glue hydro section uses lattice QCD equations of state from the Wuppertal-Budapest collaboration and the public vHLLE code, with initial conditions chosen explicitly for illustration; the text repeatedly labels the calculation 'schematic' and does not present its output as a fitted prediction or as validation of the scenario. Self-citations are frequent, but none is load-bearing for the quantitative core: the rate estimates do not invoke the authors' prior work as their source, and the pure-glue scenario is presented as a hypothesis whose ingredients are external lattice results and kinetic-theory estimates. The one genuine weakness is traceability: sigma_bb rests on a private communication and is not independently checkable from the paper, but that is a reproducibility concern, not circularity by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main model inputs are the hand-chosen hydro initial conditions and the private-communication cross section for bb production. The pure-glue initial state is an ad hoc hypothesis for this paper's central illustrative scenario. No new particles or forces are proposed.

free parameters (5)
  • Initial temperature T0 = 273 MeV
    Chosen by hand to be just above the Yang-Mills critical temperature Tc=270 MeV, motivated by Bjorken estimates for small systems (Sec. 5.5).
  • Hard-sphere initial radius R = 0.6 fm
    Hand-chosen transverse radius for the initial energy density profile in the hydro simulation (Sec. 5.5).
  • Quark chemical equilibration time tau_star = 0, 1, 5, 10, infinity fm/c
    Scenario parameters that control the rate at which quarks are produced via Eq. (17); results are shown for a range.
  • bb pair production cross section sigma_bb(30 GeV) = 1.8e-2 microbarn
    Input from private communications (Ref [20]); determines N_bb in Eq. (3).
  • Effective double-parton cross section sigma_eff = 30 mb
    Chosen as factor of two larger than the Tevatron-measured value to be conservative in estimating double charm production (Sec. 3.3).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The HESR-C collider can reach L=4e30 cm^-2 s^-1 in startup and sqrt(s) up to 30 GeV with one added beamline and unmodified PANDA.
    Stated in Sec. 1 and Fig. 1 based on Refs [5,11,12]; not demonstrated in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper A baryon-free, thermalized pure-gluon initial state can form in a subset of pp collisions at sqrt(s)=30 GeV.
    Sec. 5.5: the paper itself introduces this as 'If indeed a hot thermalized gluon fluid... is created'; it is the hypothesis powering the pure-glue opportunity.
  • domain assumption Existing parton distribution functions for antiprotons (GRV, MSTW) and Drell-Yan factorization describe the relevant kinematics.
    Used in Sec. 5.6 and Fig. 5-6 for dilepton rate estimates.
  • domain assumption The Wuppertal-Budapest lattice QCD equations of state for full QCD and pure Yang-Mills provide valid input for the hydro calculation.
    Used in Eq. (18) interpolation, Sec. 5.5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Review of opportunities at the HESR-Collider with PANDA at FAIR." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GR7472R5

@misc{pith2026190802346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Review of opportunities at the HESR-Collider with PANDA at FAIR},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GR7472R5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02346}
}
abstract

Exciting new scientific opportunities are presented for the PANDA detector at the High Energy Storage Ring in the redefined $\overline{\text{p}} \text{p}(A)$ collider mode, HESR-C, at the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) in Europe. The high luminosity, $L \sim 10^{31}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, and a wide range of intermediate and high energies, $\sqrt{s_{\text{NN}}}$ up to 30 GeV for $\overline{\text{p}} \text{p}(A)$ collisions will allow to explore a wide range of exciting topics in QCD, including the study of the production of excited open charm and bottom states, nuclear bound states containing heavy (anti)quarks, the interplay of hard and soft physics in the dilepton production, probing short-range correlations in nuclei, and the exploration of the early, complete $\overline{\text{p}}$-p-annihilation phase, where an intially pure Yang-Mills gluon plasma is formed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02346 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The existing GSI facility is shown on the left, in dark-blue the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Double parton interaction mechanism for the production of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the scaled pressure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The temperature profile of the central cell in the longitudinally [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: The GRV LO light-anti-quark parton-distribution functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Invariant-mass (left) and transverse-momentum spectra (right) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Cacciari and R

    M. Cacciari and R. Vogt, private communications

  2. [1]

    Frankfurt, M

    L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, A. Larionov, A. Lehrach, R. Maier, H. van Hees, C. Spieles, V. Vovchenko, and H. St¨ ocker, Novel physics opportunities at the HESR-Collider with PANDA at FAIR, to be published in FIAS Interdisciplinary Science series (2019), arXiv:1808.09550[hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [2]

    J. E. Augustin et al. (SLAC-SP-017 Collaboration), Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in e +e− Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1406 (1974), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1406

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.33.1406 1974

  4. [3]

    J. J. Aubert et al. (E598 Collaboration), Experimental Observation of a Heavy Particle J, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1404 (1974), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1404

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.33.1404 1974

  5. [4]

    S. W. Herb et al., Observation of a Dimuon Resonance at 9.5 GeV in 400 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 252 (1977), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.252

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.252 1977

  6. [5]

    St¨ ocker, T

    H. St¨ ocker, T. St¨ ohlker, and C. Sturm, FAIR - Cosmic Matter in the Laboratory, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 623, 012026 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/623/1/012026

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/623/1/012026 2015

  7. [6]

    Barone et al

    V. Barone et al. (PAX Collaboration), Antiproton-proton scattering experiments with polarization (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0505054, http://arxiv.org/hep-ex/0505054

    arXiv 2005

  8. [7]

    rep., Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich (2006), http://collaborations.fz-juelich.de/ikp/pax/public_files/ proposals/techproposal20060125.pdf

    PAX Collaboration, Technical Proposal for Antiproton-Proton Scattering Experiments with Polarization, Tech. rep., Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich (2006), http://collaborations.fz-juelich.de/ikp/pax/public_files/ proposals/techproposal20060125.pdf

    2006

Show all 99 references
  1. [8]

    Lehrach, Accelerator Configuration for Polarized Proton-Antiproton Physics at FAIR, AIP Conference Proceedings 915, 147 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2750755

    A. Lehrach, Accelerator Configuration for Polarized Proton-Antiproton Physics at FAIR, AIP Conference Proceedings 915, 147 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2750755. 32

    2007 doi

  2. [9]

    I. N. Mishustin, L. M. Satarov, J. Schaffner, H. St¨ ocker, and W. Greiner, Baryon anti-baryon pair production in strong meson fields, J. Phys. G 19, 1303 (1993), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/19/9/009

    1993 doi

  3. [10]

    A. B. Larionov, I. N. Mishustin, L. M. Satarov, and W. Greiner, Dynamical simulation of bound antiproton-nuclear systems and observable signals of cold nuclear compression, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014604 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014604

    2008 doi

  4. [11]

    Bradamante, I

    F. Bradamante, I. Koop, A. Otboev, V. Parkhomchuk, V. Reva, P. Shatunov, and Y. Shatunov, Conceptual design for a polarized proton-antiproton collider facility at GSI (2005), arXiv:physics/0511252, http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511252

    2005 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Lehrach, O

    A. Lehrach, O. Boine-Frankenheim, F. Hinterberger, R. Maier, and D. Prasuhn, Beam performance and luminosity limitations in the high-energy storage ring (HESR), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 561, 289 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.01.017

    2006 doi

  6. [13]

    Beller, K

    P. Beller, K. Beckert, C. Dimopoulou, A. Dolinsky, F. Nolden, M. Steck, and J. Yang, Layout of an accumulator and decelerator ring for FAIR, Conf. Proc. C 060626, 199 (2006), http: //accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/e06/PAPERS/MOPCH074.PDF

    2006

  7. [14]

    V. V. Parkhomchuk, V. B. Reva, A. N. Skrinsky, V. A. Vostrikov, K. Beckert, P. Beller, A. Dolinskii, B. Franzke, F. Nolden, and M. Steck, An Electron Cooling System for the Proposed HESR Antiproton Storage Ring, in 9th European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC 2004) Lucer...

    2004

  8. [15]

    Reistad et al., Status of the HESR electron cooler design work, Conf

    D. Reistad et al., Status of the HESR electron cooler design work, Conf. Proc. C 060626, 1648 (2006)

    2006

  9. [16]

    V. Kamerdzhiev et al., 2 MeV Electron Cooler for COSY and HESR – First Results, in Proceedings, 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC 2014): Dresden, Germany, June 15-20, 2014 , 33 MOPRI070 (2014), http://jacow.org/IPAC2014/papers/mopri070.pdf

    2014

  10. [17]

    Karliner, Heavy exotic quarkonia and doubly heavy baryons, EPJ Web Conf

    M. Karliner, Heavy exotic quarkonia and doubly heavy baryons, EPJ Web Conf. 96, 01019 (2015), https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159601019

    2015

  11. [18]

    Cacciari, P

    M. Cacciari, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, A Study of heavy flavored meson fragmentation functions in e +e− annihilation, JHEP 04, 006 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/04/006

    2006 doi

  12. [19]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, and T. Feldmann, Soft collinear effective theory and heavy to light currents beyond leading power, Nucl. Phys. B 643, 431 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0206152, http://dx.doi.org.10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00687-9

    2002 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Tanabashi et al

    M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), The Review of Particle Physics (2018), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018), http://pdg.lbl.gov/

    2018

  14. [22]

    Blok and M

    B. Blok and M. Strikman, Multiparton pp and pA Collisions: From Geometry to Parton–Parton Correlations, Adv.Ser.Direct.High Energy Phys. 29, 63 (2019), 1709.00334

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Antchev et al

    G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM), First determination of the ρ parameter at√s = 13 TeV - probing the existence of a colourless three-gluon bound state (2017), arXiv:1812.04732[hep-ex], https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04732

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Antchev et al

    G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM), Elastic differential cross-section d σ/dt at√s =2.76 TeV and implications on the existence of a colourless 3-gluon bound state (2018), arXiv:1812.08610[hep-ex], https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08610

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Lukaszuk and B

    L. Lukaszuk and B. Nicolescu, A Possible interpretation of p p rising total cross-sections, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 8, 405 (1973), https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02824484. 34

    1973 doi

  18. [26]

    G. D. Alkhazov, S. L. Belostotsky, and A. A. Vorobev, Scattering of 1-GeV Protons on Nuclei, Phys. Rept. 42, 89 (1978), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(78)90083-2

    1978 doi

  19. [27]

    A. B. Larionov and H. Lenske, Elastic scattering, polarization and absorption of relativistic antiprotons on nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 957, 450 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.10.006

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    E. M. Levin and M. I. Strikman, What One May Find Out Investigating the Scattering of Hadrons from He-4?, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 23, 216 (1976), [Yad. Fiz.23,412(1976)]

    1976

  21. [29]

    I. V. Moskalenko, A. W. Strong, J. F. Ormes, and M. S. Potgieter, Secondary anti-protons and propagation of cosmic rays in the galaxy and heliosphere, Astrophys. J. 565, 280 (2002), http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/324402

    2002 doi

  22. [30]

    A. A. Tyapkin, A possible way of establishing the existence of charmed particles, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 22, 89 (1976)

    1976

  23. [31]

    C. B. Dover and S. H. Kahana, Possibility of Charmed Hypernuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1506 (1977), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1506

    1977 doi

  24. [32]

    Tsushima and F

    K. Tsushima and F. C. Khanna, Lambda(c)+ and Lambda(b) hypernuclei, Phys. Rev. C 67, 015211 (2003), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.015211

    2003 doi

  25. [33]

    A. B. Larionov and H. Lenske, Distillation of scalar exchange by coherent hypernucleus production in antiproton-nucleus collisions, Phys. Lett. B 773, 470 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.007

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    Shyam and K

    R. Shyam and K. Tsushima, Production of Λ + c hypernuclei in antiproton - nucleus collisions, Phys. Lett. B 770, 236 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.04.057

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    Gerland, L

    L. Gerland, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, H. St¨ ocker, and W. Greiner, J/ψ production, χ polarization and color fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 762 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9803034, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.762. 35

    1998 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dutta, K

    D. Dutta, K. Hafidi, and M. Strikman, Color Transparency: past, present and future, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 69, 1 (2013), https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.11.001

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    L. L. Frankfurt and M. I. Strikman, Point-like configurations in hadrons and nuclei and deep inelastic reactions with leptons: EMC and EMC-like effects, Nucl. Phys. B 250, 143 (1985), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90477-8

    1985 doi

  30. [38]

    Alvioli, B

    M. Alvioli, B. A. Cole, L. Frankfurt, D. V. Perepelitsa, and M. Strikman, Evidence for x-dependent proton color fluctuations in pA collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 93, 011902 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.011902

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    Alvioli, L

    M. Alvioli, L. Frankfurt, D. Perepelitsa, and M. Strikman, Global analysis of color fluctuation effects in proton and deuteronnucleus collisions at RHIC and the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 98, 071502 (2018), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.071502

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    H. A. Bethe, Nuclear Many-Body Problem, Phys. Rev. 103, 1353 (1956), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.103.1353

    1956 doi

  33. [41]

    Goldstone, Derivation of the Brueckner Many-Body Theory, Proc

    J. Goldstone, Derivation of the Brueckner Many-Body Theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 239, 267 (1957), https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1957.0037

    1957

  34. [42]

    K. A. Brueckner and J. L. Gammel, Properties of Nuclear Matter, Phys. Rev. 109, 1023 (1958), https://dx.doi.org.10.1103/PhysRev.109.1023

    1958 doi

  35. [43]

    M. I. Gorenstein and G. M. Zinovev, Cluster Model of Cumulative Particle Production in Hadron-Nucleus Collisions, Phys. Lett. B 67, 100 (1977), https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90817-6

    1977 doi

  36. [44]

    Motornenko and M

    A. Motornenko and M. I. Gorenstein, Cumulative production of pions by heavy baryonic resonances in proton-nucleus collisions, J. Phys. G 44, 025105 (2017), https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa51f6

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Panova, A

    O. Panova, A. Motornenko, M. I. Gorenstein, J. Steinheimer, and H. Stoecker, Backward nucleon production by heavy baryonic 36 resonances in proton-nucleus collisions, Phys. Rev. C 100, 054617 (2019), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054617

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    L. L. Frankfurt and M. I. Strikman, How to Treat Short Range Nucleon Correlations in High-Energy Lepton Or Hadron Scattering Off Deuteron Nuclei, Phys. Lett. 69B, 93 (1977), https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90141-1

    1977 doi

  39. [47]

    L. L. Frankfurt and M. I. Strikman, High-Energy Phenomena, Short Range Nuclear Structure and QCD, Phys. Rept. 76, 215 (1981), https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(81)90129-0

    1981 doi

  40. [48]

    L. L. Frankfurt, M. I. Strikman, D. B. Day, and M. Sargsian, Evidence for short range correlations from high Q**2 (e, e-prime) reactions, Phys. Rev. C 48, 2451 (1993), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.48.2451

    1993 doi

  41. [49]

    Piasetzky, M

    E. Piasetzky, M. Sargsian, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, and J. W. Watson, Evidence for the strong dominance of proton-neutron correlations in nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 162504 (2006), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.162504

    2006 doi

  42. [50]

    Duer et al

    M. Duer et al. (CLAS), Direct Observation of Proton-Neutron Short-Range Correlation Dominance in Heavy Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 172502 (2019), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.172502

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    R. G. Arnold, C. E. Carlson, and F. Gross, Elastic electron-Deuteron Scattering at High-Energy, Phys. Rev. C 21, 1426 (1980), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.21.1426

    1980 doi

  44. [52]

    De Forest, Off-Shell electron Nucleon Cross-Sections

    T. De Forest, Off-Shell electron Nucleon Cross-Sections. The Impulse Approximation, Nucl. Phys. A 392, 232 (1983), https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(83)90124-0

    1983 doi

  45. [53]

    M. M. Sargsian, T. V. Abrahamyan, M. I. Strikman, and L. L. Frankfurt, Exclusive electro-disintegration of 3He at high Q2. II. Decay function formalism, Phys. Rev. C 71, 044615 (2005), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.044615. 37

    2005 doi

  46. [54]

    D. B. Day, L. L. Frankfurt, M. M. Sargsian, and M. I. Strikman, Towards observation of three-nucleon short-range correlations in high Q2A(e, e′)X reactions (2018), arXiv:1803.07629[nucl-th], https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07629

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Van Hove and S

    L. Van Hove and S. Pokorski, High-Energy Hadron-Hadron Collisions and Internal Hadron Structure, Nucl. Phys. B 86, 243 (1975), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(75)90443-5

    1975 doi

  48. [56]

    Raha, Dilepton, diphoton and photon production in preequilibrium, Phys

    S. Raha, Dilepton, diphoton and photon production in preequilibrium, Phys. Scripta T32, 180 (1990), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/1990/T32/030

    1990 doi

  49. [57]

    E. V. Shuryak, Two stage equilibration in high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3270 (1992), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3270

    1992 doi

  50. [58]

    J. Alam, B. Sinha, and S. Raha, Successive equilibration in quark - gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1895 (1994), https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1895

    1994 doi

  51. [59]

    T. S. Biro, E. van Doorn, B. Muller, M. H. Thoma, and X. N. Wang, Parton equilibration in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 48, 1275 (1993), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.48.1275

    1993 doi

  52. [60]

    D. M. Elliott and D. H. Rischke, Chemical equilibration of quarks and gluons at RHIC and LHC energies, Nucl. Phys. A 671, 583 (2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00840-4

    2000 doi

  53. [61]

    Xu and C

    Z. Xu and C. Greiner, Thermalization of gluons in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions by including three-body interactions in a parton cascade, Phys. Rev. C 71, 064901 (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064901

    2005 doi

  54. [62]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical equilibration in weakly coupled QCD, Phys. Rev. D99, 054018 (2019), 1811.03068

    2019 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical Equilibration in Hadronic Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 142301 (2019), 1811.03040. 38

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Effective kinetic theory for high temperature gauge theories, JHEP 01, 030 (2003), hep-ph/0209353

    2003 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Kurkela and Y

    A. Kurkela and Y. Zhu, Isotropization and hydrodynamization in weakly coupled heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 182301 (2015), 1506.06647

    2015 arXiv

  58. [66]

    M. P. Heller, A. Kurkela, M. Spaliski, and V. Svensson, Hydrodynamization in kinetic theory: Transient modes and the gradient expansion, Phys. Rev. D97, 091503 (2018), 1609.04803

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    H. St¨ ocker et al., Glueballs amass at RHIC and LHC Colliders! - The early quarkless 1st order phase transition at T = 270 MeV - from pure Yang-Mills glue plasma to GlueBall-Hagedorn states, J. Phys. G 43, 015105 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/015105

    2016 doi

  60. [68]

    St¨ ocker et al., Undersaturation of quarks at early stages of relativistic nuclear collisions: The hot glue initial scenario and its observable signatures, Astron

    H. St¨ ocker et al., Undersaturation of quarks at early stages of relativistic nuclear collisions: The hot glue initial scenario and its observable signatures, Astron. Nachr. 336 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.201512252

    2015 doi

  61. [69]

    Borsanyi, G

    S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, Precision SU(3) lattice thermodynamics for a large temperature range, JHEP 07, 056 (2012), https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)056

    2012 doi

  62. [70]

    Beitel, C

    M. Beitel, C. Greiner, and H. St¨ ocker, Fast dynamical evolution of a hadron resonance gas via Hagedorn states, Phys. Rev. C 94, 021902 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.021902

    2016 doi

  63. [71]

    Vovchenko, M

    V. Vovchenko, M. I. Gorenstein, L. M. Satarov, I. N. Mishustin, L. P. Csernai, I. Kisel, and H. St¨ ocker, Entropy production in chemically nonequilibrium quark-gluon plasma created in central Pb+Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev....

    2016 doi

  64. [72]

    Vovchenko, I

    V. Vovchenko, I. A. Karpenko, M. I. Gorenstein, L. M. Satarov, I. N. Mishustin, B. K¨ ampfer, and H. St¨ ocker, Electromagnetic probes of a 39 pure-glue initial state in nucleus-nucleus collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 94, 024906...

    2016 doi

  65. [73]

    Vovchenko, L.-G

    V. Vovchenko, L.-G. Pang, H. Niemi, I. A. Karpenko, M. I. Gorenstein, L. M. Satarov, I. N. Mishustin, B. K¨ ampfer, and H. St¨ ocker, Hydrodynamic modeling of a pure-glue initial scenario in high-energy hadron and heavy-ion collisions, PoS BORMIO2016, 039 (2016), https://doi.o...

    2016 doi

  66. [74]

    Karpenko, P

    I. Karpenko, P. Huovinen, and M. Bleicher, A 3+1 dimensional viscous hydrodynamic code for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 3016 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.07.010

    2014 doi

  67. [75]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, and K. K. Szabo, Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors, Phys. Lett. B 730, 99 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.007

    2014 doi

  68. [76]

    Vovchenko, Quantum statistical van der Waals equation and its QCD applications, Ph.D

    V. Vovchenko, Quantum statistical van der Waals equation and its QCD applications, Ph.D. thesis, Goethe University Frankfurt (2018), http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/ index/docId/46301

    2018

  69. [77]

    Rapp and J

    R. Rapp and J. Wambach, Low mass dileptons at the CERN SPS: Evidence for chiral restoration?, Eur. Phys. J. A 6, 415 (1999), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100500050364

    1999 doi

  70. [78]

    R. Rapp, J. Wambach, and H. van Hees, The Chiral Restoration Transition of QCD and Low Mass Dileptons, Landolt-B¨ ornstein23, 134 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01539-7_6

    2010 doi

  71. [79]

    Endres, H

    S. Endres, H. van Hees, and M. Bleicher, Photon and dilepton production at the Facility for Proton and Anti-Proton Research and beam-energy scan at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider using coarse-grained microscopic transport simulations, Phys. Rev. C 93, 054901 (2016), http:...

    2016 doi

  72. [80]

    Galatyuk, P

    T. Galatyuk, P. M. Hohler, R. Rapp, F. Seck, and J. Stroth, Thermal Dileptons from Coarse-Grained Transport as Fireball Probes at SIS 40 Energies, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 131 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16131-1

    2016 doi

  73. [81]

    Staudenmaier, J

    J. Staudenmaier, J. Weil, V. Steinberg, S. Endres, and H. Petersen, Dilepton production and resonance properties within a new hadronic transport approach in the context of the GSI-HADES experimental data, Phys. Rev. C 98, 054908 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.054908

    2018 doi

  74. [82]

    Linnyk, E

    O. Linnyk, E. L. Bratkovskaya, and W. Cassing, Effective QCD and transport description of dilepton and photon production in heavy-ion collisions and elementary processes, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 87, 50 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.12.003

    2016 doi

  75. [83]

    Dulat, T.-J

    S. Dulat, T.-J. Hou, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, C. Schmidt, D. Stump, and C.-P. Yuan, New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93, 033006 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033006

    2016 doi

  76. [84]

    Gl¨ uck, E

    M. Gl¨ uck, E. Reya, and I. Schienbein, Pionic parton distributions revisited, Eur. Phys. C 10, 313 (1999), http://doi.org/10.1007/s100529900124

    1999 doi

  77. [85]

    Spieles, L

    C. Spieles, L. Gerland, N. Hammon, M. Bleicher, S. A. Bass, H. St¨ ocker, W. Greiner, C. Lourenco, and R. Vogt, A Microscopic calculation of secondary Drell-Yan production in heavy ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 5, 349 (1998), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100520050279

    1998 doi

  78. [86]

    Spieles, L

    C. Spieles, L. Gerland, N. Hammon, M. Bleicher, S. A. Bass, H. St¨ ocker, W. Greiner, C. Lourenco, and R. Vogt, Intermediate mass dileptons from secondary Drell-Yan processes, Nucl. Phys. A 638, 507 (1998), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00345-5

    1998 doi

  79. [87]

    Spieles and M

    C. Spieles and M. Bleicher, Secondary Drell-Yan dileptons in heavy-ion reactions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 28, 1950047 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301319500472

    2019 doi

  80. [88]

    Angeles-Martinez et al., Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD) parton distribution functions: status and prospects, Acta Phys

    R. Angeles-Martinez et al., Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD) parton distribution functions: status and prospects, Acta Phys. Polon. 41 B 46, 2501 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.46.2501

    2015 doi

  81. [89]

    Anassontzis et al., High mass dimuon production in ¯pn and π−n interactions at 125-GeV/c, Phys

    E. Anassontzis et al., High mass dimuon production in ¯pn and π−n interactions at 125-GeV/c, Phys. Rev. D 38, 1377 (1988), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1377

    1988 doi

  82. [90]

    Eichstaedt, S

    F. Eichstaedt, S. Leupold, K. Gallmeister, H. van Hees, and U. Mosel, Description of Fully Differential Drell-Yan Pair Production, PoS BORMIO2011, 042 (2011), arXiv:1108.5287[hep-ph], https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.5287

    2011 arXiv

  83. [91]

    A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1072-5

    2009 doi

  84. [92]

    J. C. Webb et al. (NuSea Collaboration), Absolute Drell-Yan dimuon cross-sections in 800 GeV/c pp and pd collisions (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0302019, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0302019

    2003 arXiv

  85. [93]

    J. C. Webb, Measurement of continuum dimuon production in 800 GeV/c proton nucleon collisions , Ph.D. thesis, New Mexico State U. (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0301031, http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1155678

    2003 arXiv

  86. [94]

    P. L. McGaughey et al. (E772 Collaboration), Cross-sections for the production of high mass muon pairs from 800-GeV proton bombardment of H-2, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3038 (1994), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D60,119903(1999)], http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50. 3038,10.1103/PhysRevD.60.119903

    1994 doi

  87. [95]

    Moreno et al., Dimuon production in proton - copper collisions at√s = 38.8 GeV, Phys

    G. Moreno et al., Dimuon production in proton - copper collisions at√s = 38.8 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 43, 2815 (1991), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2815

    1991 doi

  88. [96]

    A. S. Ito et al., Measurement of the Continuum of Dimuons Produced in High-Energy Proton - Nucleus Collisions, Phys. Rev. D 23, 604 (1981), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.604. 42

    1981 doi

  89. [97]

    S. R. Smith et al., Experimental Test of the Drell-Yan Model in pW→µ+µ−X, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1607 (1981), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.1607

    1981 doi

  90. [98]

    O. Buss, T. Gaitanos, K. Gallmeister, H. van Hees, M. Kaskulov, et al., Transport-theoretical Description of Nuclear Reactions, Phys. Rept. 512, 1 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.12.001

    2012 doi

  91. [99]

    Baier, Y

    R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff, Radiative energy loss and p(T) broadening of high-energy partons in nuclei, Nucl. Phys. B 484, 265 (1997), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00581-0. 43

    1997 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.