Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 4 cited by

Multi-Quark Colour Decompositions from Unitarity

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read New KK-independent bases, derived from unitarity factorisation, give exact tree-level colour decompositions with any chosen pair of quarks or gluons fixed next to each other.

desk verdict Genuinely useful new colour decompositions, but the linear-independence proof in §3.4.3 has a load-bearing gap that needs filling. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02695 v2 pith:XOYNDD6B submitted 2019-08-07 hep-ph hep-th

classification hep-phhep-th
keywords colourdecompositionmulti-quarkamplitudesunitarityfactorisationKKrelationscolour-orderedloopQCDfactors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that colour decompositions of multi-quark QCD tree amplitudes can be derived from the same physical principle used to bootstrap their kinematics: unitarity factorisation. The authors construct new bases of colour-ordered amplitudes—linearly independent under the standard KK shuffle relations—in which any chosen pair of particles, like-flavour quark and antiquark, distinct-flavour quarks, quark and gluon, or two gluons, is fixed next to each other, and they give closed-form colour factors for the associated decompositions. The point of the construction is flexibility: a colour decomposition whose ordered amplitudes are anchored on an arbitrary pair of partons can be matched to the loop topologies encountered in unitarity cuts, so the loop-colour method for full-colour amplitudes extends from pure Yang-Mills theory to QCD with quarks. If the construction is right, computing full-colour loop QCD amplitudes reduces to dressing ordered cut amplitudes with recursively factorised colour factors.

What carries the argument

The central object is a 'co-unitary' basis: a set of KK-independent colour-ordered amplitudes with two fixed, adjacent 'stretched' particles such that, for every factorisation channel that separates the fixed pair, the set of surviving residues equals the Cartesian product of the lower-point bases on the two sides (equation (2.10)). This property is the bridge that lets kinematic factorisation constrain colour: equating the two orders of operations—colour-decompose then take a residue, versus take the residue then colour-decompose—forces the colour-factor factorisation relation (2.2). The bases are built from recursively defined 'bracket structures' that encode the allowed quark orderings, with the previously known like-flavour bracket set and its colour factors as the degenerate starting point; the new distinct-flavour, quark-gluon, and gluon-gluon cases allow both orientations of unenclosed brackets. The same co-unitarity property, together with colour-ordered splitting, produces the leg-exchange relations (2.3)–(2.5), which reduce all colour factors to three-point vertices.

What would settle it

Compute, for a concrete low-multiplicity case such as the six-point, three-quark-pair amplitude with a distinct-flavour stretch, the set of residues of basis (3.19) in the channel $s_{1P}$ with $P=\{2,5\}$: if the surviving orderings are not exactly $B^{1,\bar p}_P \times B^{p,4}_R$ for the required intermediate particle $p$, co-unitarity (2.10) fails and the decomposition cannot be fixed by factorisation. Alternatively, evaluate both sides of (2.1) numerically at a generic kinematic point for a specific SU(3) helicity configuration; any mismatch between the colour-dressed amplitude and the proposed sum over the basis would falsify the decomposition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that equations (3.19), (3.26) and (3.29) define bases of colour-ordered amplitudes that are independent with respect to the KK relations, and that the colour factors in equations (3.24), (3.28) and (3.31) produce exact tree-level colour decompositions of the form (2.1) for an arbitrary stretched pair: like-flavour $\bar{q}q$, distinct-flavour $qQ$, quark-gluon, and gluon-gluon. The structural result is colour factorisation (2.2): the colour coefficient of an ordered amplitude splits into a product of lower-point colour coefficients whenever a single particle can balance the flavour of the chosen factorisation channel. This follows from 'co-unitarity' of the bases, the property that in every channel separating the fixed particles the surviving residues are precisely the Cartesian product of the corresponding lower-point bases. The authors verify co-unitarity case by case, prove linear independence by induction using the counting $(n-2)!/k!$, and show that the decompositions inherit the factorisation and leg-exchange identities, so every colour factor eventually reduces to three-point colour vertices.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is co-unitarity of the proposed bases (equation (2.10))—that in every factorisation channel separating the fixed particles the surviving residues are exactly the Cartesian product of lower-point bases—which is verified case by case with bracket structures rather than proved from a closed-form definition, with the independence argument also assuming every new-basis amplitude has at least one non-vanishing residue in some $s_{1P}$ channel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any chosen pair of partons—like-flavour quark-antiquark, distinct-flavour quarks, quark-gluon, or gluon-gluon—can be fixed adjacent, so ordered-amplitude sums can be tailored to the topology of a given unitarity cut.
  • Colour factors in the new decompositions factor recursively into lower-point factors and obey leg-exchange identities, so implementing them reduces to repeated application down to three-point colour vertices.
  • Inserted into unitarity cuts, these tree decompositions extend the loop-colour construction from pure Yang-Mills theory to full-colour QCD loop amplitudes with an arbitrary number of quark pairs.
  • At one loop, the ordered numerators organise into rings built from comb-like gluon colour strings and the previously known $\bar{q}q$ colour building blocks, with fermionic signs flowing consistently from flavour-permutation identities.
  • Because every new basis has $(n-2)!/k!$ elements and is KK-independent, each decomposition is proper: the ordered amplitudes are linearly independent, matching the standard counting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The co-unitarity criterion itself is a search principle: any candidate basis for other matter representations, such as scalars, symmetric or antisymmetric tensors, or further relation-reduced amplitude sets, can be tested by the same factorisation-product property before a decomposition is written down.
  • Because the colour factors are fixed recursively rather than only by closed-form expressions, the construction suggests a fully algorithmic implementation in which colour factors are evaluated on demand by factorisation and leg-exchange moves, which could be built into automated amplitude generators.
  • The same machinery should extend to two loops: choosing quark-gluon or gluon-gluon stretches at each corner of the cut diagrams ought to reproduce the known full-colour two-loop results without additional colour-algebra integration, a prediction that is directly checkable.
  • Separating decompositions by stretch choice may give cleaner bookkeeping of fermion-loop contributions at higher loops, since the relative fermionic signs are already encoded in the flavour-permutation step at the level of cuts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs new Kleiss-Kuijf-independent bases of colour-ordered tree amplitudes for multi-quark QCD processes with arbitrary "stretch" pairs: like-flavour q-qbar, distinct-flavour q-Q, quark-gluon, and gluon-gluon. The bases are defined through bracket structures in eqs. (3.19), (3.26), and (3.29). The authors prove the co-unitarity property (2.10) for these bases, use it to derive factorisation relations for the colour factors, and give closed-form colour decompositions, eqs. (3.24), (3.28), and (3.31), built from the previously proven CJO and DDM building blocks. They then outline applications to one-loop full-colour QCD amplitudes in the loop-colour framework of ref. [20].

Significance. If the construction is correct, the paper fills a genuine gap: it provides flexible tree-level colour decompositions needed to extend the loop-colour method from pure Yang-Mills to QCD with matter. The unitarity-factorisation derivation is conceptually clean and is not circular: co-unitarity fixes the colour factors from lower-point objects, and the new closed forms are expressed in terms of independently proven ingredients. The paper is also careful to rely on the known Melia basis result rather than re-derive it. The principal weakness is that a load-bearing existence statement in the linear-independence proof is asserted but not proved; with a short proof supplied, the main claims should go through.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.4.3 (p. 22)] The induction for linear independence rests on the sentence "every colour-ordered amplitude contains at least one channel in which it has a non-vanishing residue." This assertion is not proved and is load-bearing: if some element of the qQ, qg, or gg basis had no non-vanishing residue in any channel of the form s_{1P} with P and R both non-empty, its coefficient in eq. (3.45) would never be forced to vanish by the induction, and the KK-independence claim would fail even though the cardinality is correct. The co-unitarity checks (3.40)–(3.43) characterise the surviving residues for each split, but they do not by themselves show that every element participates in at least one such split. Please provide an explicit proof of this existence statement from the recursive definitions (3.17), (3.19), (3.26), and (3.29), or restructure the proof to avoid relying on it.
  2. [§3.3 and §3.4.3] The qg and gg bases are introduced without an explicit cardinality computation, yet the linear-independence proof explicitly uses the fact that the sets have the right counting (n−2)!/k!. The only detailed count given is for the qQ basis in eq. (3.21). Please add the analogous counting for the definitions (3.26) and (3.29), including the correct treatment of the fixed gluons in the shuffle over gluon labels.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, eq. (3.26)] In the definition of the qg basis, the shuffle should be over the gluon set excluding the fixed gluon n; with G_{n−2k} as defined in eq. (3.5), the fixed gluon n would appear both inside (1)⊕σ and at the end of A(1,σ,n). Compare with the correct use of G_{n−2k−2} in eq. (3.29). Please correct the index.
  2. [§3.4.1] It would improve the co-unitarity verification to state explicitly that the cases enumerated in eqs. (3.40)–(3.43) and Figures 1–3 are exhaustive for each basis, i.e., that the gluon, quark, and antiquark channels are the only possible factorisation channels. This would make the case analysis self-contained.
  3. [§3.4.2] The paragraph on qqbar splitting asserts a one-to-one correspondence between the (n−1)-point basis with a split gluon and the n-point basis with an adjacent quark pair. A formal statement of the bijection used in eq. (2.14) would make the argument easier to check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new bases are checked by direct combinatorial factorisation and the colour factors are fixed against external DDM and Melia results.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The new bases in eqs. (3.19), (3.26) and (3.29) are defined combinatorially through bracket structures, and their co-unitarity property (2.10) is verified case by case in Section 3.4.1 directly from these definitions. The colour factors are then fixed by matching factorisation residues against the known DDM decomposition (1.1) and the known Melia/CJO q-qbar decomposition (3.7)-(3.9). The latter is not merely self-citation: the closed-form construction is attributed to ref. [24] but the authors explicitly state it 'was conjectured by Johansson and one of the current authors [24] and subsequently proven by Melia [25]', so the load-bearing ingredient has independent external support. The linear-independence proof in Section 3.4.3 uses an induction with lower-point bases as hypotheses and invokes the assertion that every new-basis amplitude has at least one non-vanishing s_{1P} residue; this assertion is not proved in the text, and it is a genuine proof gap rather than a circular step, since it is not an input of the construction and is in fact plausible from the top-level bracket structure of the bases. Self-citations to refs. [14,20] concern the loop-colour application in Section 4, not the tree-level theorem, and are therefore not load-bearing for the central claim. No equation is equivalent by construction to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. It relies on standard QCD colour algebra, physical factorisation, the previously proven Melia/JO qqbar decomposition, and the loop-colour master formula of the authors' earlier work. The new bases and co-unitarity notion are mathematical constructions, not postulated physics.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The space of n-parton, k-quark-pair colour-ordered amplitudes has Kleiss-Kuijf dimension (n-2)!/k! and is spanned by any KK-independent set of that size.
    Used in Sections 3.4 and 3.4.3 to guarantee that sets of the right size are bases; established by Melia [27] and taken as input.
  • domain assumption Tree-level colour-dressed amplitudes factorise on physical poles as products of lower-point amplitudes, as used in the residue formula in Section 2.1, eq. (2.7).
    Central to deriving the colour-factorisation relation (2.2) and fixing colour coefficients; standard QFT property assumed without proof.
  • domain assumption The Johansson-Ochirov and Melia colour decomposition for like-flavour qqbar stretches, with colour factors (3.9) in the Melia basis, is valid.
    Used as a building block in the closed forms (3.24) and for the induction base in Section 3.4.3; proven by Melia [25].
  • domain assumption The gauge-group colour algebra is generated by fundamental generators T^a and structure constants f^{abc} satisfying the Jacobi and commutation relations (2.6).
    Standard QCD colour algebra; assumed throughout.
  • domain assumption The loop-colour master formula (4.1) of Ochirov and Page [20] correctly reconstructs loop integrands from unitarity cuts.
    Underlies the Section 4 loop-level applications; not proven in this paper, cited from ref. [20].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-Quark Colour Decompositions from Unitarity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XOYNDD6B

@misc{pith2026190802695,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-Quark Colour Decompositions from Unitarity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XOYNDD6B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02695}
}
read the original abstract

Any loop QCD amplitude at full colour is constructed from kinematic and gauge-group building blocks. In a unitarity-based on-shell framework, both objects can be reconstructed from their respective counterparts in tree-level amplitudes. This procedure is at its most powerful when aligned with flexible colour decompositions of tree-level QCD amplitudes. In this note we derive such decompositions for amplitudes with an arbitrary number of quarks and gluons from the same principle that is used to bootstrap kinematics - unitarity factorisation. In the process we formulate new multi-quark bases and provide closed-form expressions for the new decompositions. We then elaborate upon their application in colour decompositions of loop multi-quark amplitudes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gleaning gravitational amplitudes -- a double copy for canceling dilatons

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An asymmetric double copy with a ghost-like sqrt-dilaton cancels dilaton contaminations in tree-level GR amplitudes with massive scalars up to six points, leaving a residual bubble ambiguity at one loop.

  2. On the Double Copy for Spinning Matter

    hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Massive spinning-particle gravitational amplitudes are obtained by dimensional reduction of massless double copy amplitudes, fixing g=2 and matter couplings, and the Goldberger-Ridgway classical double copy is identif...

  3. Regge factorization of tree-level QCD amplitudes using a minimal set of lightcone variables

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    All tree-level QCD multi-Regge emission vertices with up to four final-state partons are extracted in a minimal lightcone-variable frame and collected in the MREV Mathematica library.

  4. The Many Colours of Amplitudes

    hep-th 2024-12 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors compute exact numbers of independent colour tensors for all simple Lie algebras and survey their factorial, exponential, and special-group behaviour.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [20]

    Ochirov and B

    A. Ochirov and B. Page, Full Colour for Loop Amplitudes in Yang-Mills Theory , JHEP 02 (2017) 100 [ 1612.04366]

  2. [1]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti, Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 062001 [1511.05409]

  3. [2]

    D. C. Dunbar and W. B. Perkins, Two-loop five-point all plus helicity Yang-Mills amplitude , Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 085029 [ 1603.07514]

  4. [3]

    D. C. Dunbar, G. R. Jehu and W. B. Perkins, The two-loop n-point all-plus helicity amplitude, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 125006 [ 1604.06631]

  5. [4]

    D. C. Dunbar, G. R. Jehu and W. B. Perkins, Two-loop six gluon all plus helicity amplitude , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 061602 [ 1605.06351]

  6. [5]

    D. C. Dunbar, J. H. Godwin, G. R. Jehu and W. B. Perkins, Analytic all-plus-helicity gluon amplitudes in QCD , Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 116013 [ 1710.10071]

  7. [6]

    Badger, C

    S. Badger, C. Bronnum-Hansen, H. B. Hartanto and T. Peraro, First look at two-loop five-gluon scattering in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 092001 [ 1712.02229]

  8. [7]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and M. Zeng, Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 116014 [ 1712.03946]

Show all 52 references
  1. [8]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. A. Lim and A. Mitov, Two-loop five-point massless QCD amplitudes within the integration-by-parts approach, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 076011 [ 1805.09182]

  2. [9]

    Badger, C

    S. Badger, C. Bronnum-Hansen, T. Gehrmann, H. B. Hartanto, J. Henn, N. A. Lo Presti et al., Applications of integrand reduction to two-loop five-point scattering amplitudes in QCD, PoS LL2018 (2018) 006 [ 1807.09709]

  3. [10]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov, Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity , JHEP 11 (2018) 116 [ 1809.09067]

  4. [11]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita and B. Page, Analytic Form of Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Scattering Amplitudes in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 082002 [1812.04586]

  5. [12]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov, Analytic Form of the Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Scattering Amplitudes in QCD , JHEP 05 (2019) 084 [1904.00945]. – 30 –

  6. [13]

    Badger, D

    S. Badger, D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, G. Heinrich, J. M. Henn, T. Peraro et al., Analytic form of the full two-loop five-gluon all-plus helicity amplitude , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 071601 [1905.03733]

  7. [14]

    Badger, G

    S. Badger, G. Mogull, A. Ochirov and D. O’Connell, A Complete Two-Loop, Five-Gluon Helicity Amplitude in Yang-Mills Theory , JHEP 10 (2015) 064 [ 1507.08797]

  8. [15]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. Frellesvig and Y. Zhang, A Two-Loop Five-Gluon Helicity Amplitude in QCD , JHEP 1312 (2013) 045 [ 1310.1051]

  9. [16]

    Badger, G

    S. Badger, G. Mogull and T. Peraro, Local integrands for two-loop all-plus Yang-Mills amplitudes, JHEP 08 (2016) 063 [ 1606.02244]

  10. [17]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower, One-Loop n-Point Gauge Theory Amplitudes, Unitarity and Collinear Limits , Nucl. Phys. B425 (1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226]

  11. [18]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower, Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes , Nucl.Phys. B435 (1995) 59 [ hep-ph/9409265]

  12. [19]

    Britto, F

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills, Nucl.Phys. B725 (2005) 275 [ hep-th/0412103]

  13. [21]

    Del Duca, L

    V. Del Duca, L. J. Dixon and F. Maltoni, New color decompositions for gauge amplitudes at tree and loop level , Nucl.Phys. B571 (2000) 51 [ hep-ph/9910563]

  14. [22]

    L. J. Dixon, Calculating scattering amplitudes efficiently , in QCD and beyond. Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, TASI-95, Boulder, USA, June 4-30, 1995 , pp. 539–584, 1996, hep-ph/9601359, http://www- public.slac.stanford.edu/sciD...

  15. [23]

    Kleiss and H

    R. Kleiss and H. Kuijf, Multi - Gluon Cross-sections and Five Jet Production at Hadron Colliders, Nucl.Phys. B312 (1989) 616

  16. [24]

    Johansson and A

    H. Johansson and A. Ochirov, Color-Kinematics Duality for QCD Amplitudes , JHEP 01 (2016) 170 [ 1507.00332]

  17. [25]

    Melia, Proof of a new colour decomposition for QCD amplitudes , JHEP 12 (2015) 107 [1509.03297]

    T. Melia, Proof of a new colour decomposition for QCD amplitudes , JHEP 12 (2015) 107 [1509.03297]

  18. [26]

    Melia, Dyck words and multiquark primitive amplitudes , Phys.Rev

    T. Melia, Dyck words and multiquark primitive amplitudes , Phys.Rev. D88 (2013) 014020 [1304.7809]

  19. [27]

    Melia, Getting more flavor out of one-flavor QCD , Phys.Rev

    T. Melia, Getting more flavor out of one-flavor QCD , Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) 074012 [1312.0599]

  20. [28]

    Bern and D

    Z. Bern and D. A. Kosower, Color decomposition of one loop amplitudes in gauge theories , Nucl.Phys. B362 (1991) 389

  21. [29]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and D. A. Kosower, One loop corrections to two quark three gluon amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B437 (1995) 259 [ hep-ph/9409393]

  22. [30]

    Ita and K

    H. Ita and K. Ozeren, Colour Decompositions of Multi-quark One-loop QCD Amplitudes , JHEP 1202 (2012) 118 [ 1111.4193]

  23. [31]

    Reuschle and S

    C. Reuschle and S. Weinzierl, Decomposition of one-loop QCD amplitudes into primitive amplitudes based on shuffle relations , Phys.Rev. D88 (2013) 105020 [ 1310.0413]. – 31 –

  24. [32]

    Schuster, Color ordering in QCD , Phys.Rev

    T. Schuster, Color ordering in QCD , Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) 105022 [ 1311.6296]

  25. [33]

    K¨ alin,Cyclic Mario worlds — color-decomposition for one-loop QCD , JHEP 04 (2018) 141 [1712.03539]

    G. K¨ alin,Cyclic Mario worlds — color-decomposition for one-loop QCD , JHEP 04 (2018) 141 [1712.03539]

  26. [34]

    Z. Bern, J. Carrasco and H. Johansson, New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes , Phys.Rev. D78 (2008) 085011 [ 0805.3993]

  27. [35]

    R. W. Brown and S. G. Naculich, Color-factor symmetry and BCJ relations for QCD amplitudes, JHEP 11 (2016) 060 [ 1608.05291]

  28. [36]

    Ossola, C

    G. Ossola, C. G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level , Nucl. Phys. B763 (2007) 147 [ hep-ph/0609007]

  29. [37]

    Mastrolia and G

    P. Mastrolia and G. Ossola, On the Integrand-Reduction Method for Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes, JHEP 1111 (2011) 014 [ 1107.6041]

  30. [38]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. Frellesvig and Y. Zhang, Hepta-Cuts of Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes , JHEP 1204 (2012) 055 [ 1202.2019]

  31. [39]

    Zhang, Integrand-Level Reduction of Loop Amplitudes by Computational Algebraic Geometry Methods, JHEP 1209 (2012) 042 [ 1205.5707]

    Y. Zhang, Integrand-Level Reduction of Loop Amplitudes by Computational Algebraic Geometry Methods, JHEP 1209 (2012) 042 [ 1205.5707]

  32. [40]

    Mastrolia, E

    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola and T. Peraro, Scattering Amplitudes from Multivariate Polynomial Division , Phys.Lett. B718 (2012) 173 [ 1205.7087]

  33. [41]

    Ita, Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms , Phys

    H. Ita, Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 116015 [ 1510.05626]

  34. [42]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory , Phys.Rev.Lett. 105 (2010) 061602 [ 1004.0476]

  35. [43]

    Johansson and A

    H. Johansson and A. Ochirov, Pure Gravities via Color-Kinematics Duality for Fundamental Matter, JHEP 11 (2015) 046 [ 1407.4772]

  36. [44]

    Plefka and W

    J. Plefka and W. Wormsbecher, New relations for graviton-matter amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 026011 [ 1804.09651]

  37. [45]

    de la Cruz, A

    L. de la Cruz, A. Kniss and S. Weinzierl, Proof of the fundamental BCJ relations for QCD amplitudes, JHEP 09 (2015) 197 [ 1508.01432]

  38. [46]

    Primo and W

    A. Primo and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, BCJ Identities and d-Dimensional Generalized Unitarity, JHEP 04 (2016) 125 [ 1602.03161]

  39. [47]

    Ochirov, P

    A. Ochirov, P. Tourkine and P. Vanhove, One-loop monodromy relations on single cuts , JHEP 10 (2017) 105 [ 1707.05775]

  40. [48]

    J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, Five-Point Amplitudes in N=4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory and N=8 Supergravity, Phys.Rev. D85 (2012) 025006 [ 1106.4711]

  41. [49]

    Abreu, L

    S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng, The two-loop five-point amplitude inN = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121603 [ 1812.08941]

  42. [50]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, Analytic result for a two-loop five-particle amplitude , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121602 [ 1812.11057]

  43. [51]

    C. Duhr, H. Johansson, G. K¨ alin, G. Mogull and B. Verbeek, The Full-Color Two-Loop Four-Gluon Amplitude inN = 2 Super-QCD, 1904.05299

  44. [52]

    A. C. Edison and S. G. Naculich, SU(N) group-theory constraints on color-ordered five-point amplitudes at all loop orders , Nucl.Phys. B858 (2012) 488 [ 1111.3821]. – 32 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.