Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Compton-like scattering of a scalar particle with N photons and one graviton

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One master formula computes tree amplitudes for a scalar coupled to N photons and one graviton.

desk verdict A compact all-N tree-level master formula for scalar QED plus one graviton, with honest low-N checks; the main residual risk is the coincidence-limit regularization in Section 3.1, which I judge manageable but worth an independent Feynman cross-check. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03425 v3 pith:GPN2BFX3 submitted 2019-08-09 hep-th

Naser Ahmadiniaz , Filippo Maria Balli , Olindo Corradini , José Manuel Dávila , Christian Schubert This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords tree-levelamplitudesworldlineformalismscalarQEDgravitonscatteringgaugetransversalitydiffeomorphismreplacementrulephoton-graviton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives a closed-form expression for the tree-level scattering amplitude of a massive scalar particle with an arbitrary number $N$ of photons and one graviton. It separates the amplitude into an irreducible part, in which every external particle attaches directly to the scalar line, and reducible parts, in which a photon line emits the graviton. The master formula states that the full result is the irreducible worldline amplitude plus a sum over the $N$ photons of the ordinary $N$-photon amplitude, with one photon's polarization replaced by an effective vector and its momentum shifted by the graviton momentum. The formula is shown to satisfy the on-shell gauge and diffeomorphism transversality conditions for every photon leg and for the graviton leg. If correct, it reduces a diagram-rich mixed gauge-gravity computation to a single algebraic rule that works for any $N$.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the worldline path-integral representation of the dressed scalar propagator, in which external fields appear as vertex operators integrated along the particle's line. Three pieces carry the argument: the graviton-polarization parametrization $\epsilon_{\mu\nu}=\lambda_\mu\rho_\nu$, $\varepsilon_0=\lambda+\rho$, which makes the graviton vertex photon-like; the master formula Eq. (20), whose delta-function terms encode seagull and quartic vertices; and the replacement rule Eq. (34)-(35), which maps the photon-graviton vertex to the vector $\upsilon^\mu_l$ and shifts $k_l\to k_l+k_0$. The transversality proof depends on two facts: the effective vector vanishes when a photon polarization is replaced by its momentum, and the diffeomorphism variation of $\upsilon_l$ splits into a term that cancels the irreducible contribution plus a term that dies by photon transversality.

What would settle it

Evaluate Eq. (37) at $N=3$ with explicit on-shell momenta and polarizations, contract the graviton leg with $k_0\xi$, and simplify; the claim predicts the result is zero. Computing the same amplitude directly from the perturbative expansion of scalar QED coupled to linearized gravity at the same kinematic point gives an independent number, and any nonzero contraction or mismatch with the formula would falsify the arbitrary-$N$ claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (37): for arbitrary $N$, the full two-scalar $N$-photon one-graviton amplitude equals the irreducible worldline amplitude plus a sum of $N$-photon amplitudes in which one line is replaced by the effective polarization vector $\upsilon_l$ at shifted momentum $k_l+k_0$. The irreducible part is generated by a graviton vertex operator that, after the parametrization $\epsilon_{\mu\nu}=\lambda_\mu\rho_\nu$ with $\varepsilon_{0\mu}=\lambda_\mu+\rho_\mu$, takes exactly the form of a photon vertex operator; auxiliary ghost fields cancel the singular coincidence limit of the velocity correlator, leaving $\langle \dot q^\mu(\tau_0)\dot q^\nu(\tau_0)\rangle=-2\delta^{\mu\nu}/T$. The reducible part is not obtained by sewing diagrams but by a replacement rule acting on the known $N$-photon amplitude. On-shell, the construction yields transversality $M^{(N,1)}(\ldots;k_0\xi,k_0)=0$ on the graviton leg and the analogous condition on every photon leg.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the singular self-correlation of the particle's velocity at the graviton insertion point is cancelled exactly by the auxiliary ghost fields, leaving the finite replacement $\langle \dot q^\mu(\tau_0)\dot q^\nu(\tau_0)\rangle=-2\delta^{\mu\nu}/T$; if another valid regularization shifts that finite remainder, the master formula and the transversality results no longer follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With Eq. (37), the full amplitude for any $N$ is available without enumerating the separate seagull, quartic, and single-emission diagrams: compute the irreducible worldline correlator and apply the replacement rule to the known $N$-photon formula.
  • Photon transversality holds separately for the irreducible and reducible sectors, so each part can be checked independently before they are summed.
  • The graviton transversality condition requires a precise cancellation between the reducible and irreducible parts; the paper displays this cancellation explicitly for $N=0,1,2$ and asserts it for arbitrary $N$.
  • For $N=1$ the formula reproduces the previously known factorization of gravitational photoproduction, where the mixed amplitude reduces to the scalar QED photon-photon amplitude times a simple spin-independent factor.
  • Because the underlying worldline expressions hold off-shell, the master formula can be applied before scalar on-shell conditions are imposed, which makes it a candidate input for off-shell or recursion-based amplitude constructions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The replacement rule looks naturally iterative: applying it to two different photon lines in a pure $N$-photon amplitude would build the two-graviton reducible sector, although the paper notes that chains of ghost contractions need extra care before that step is rigorous.
  • The photon-like form of the graviton vertex suggests that soft-graviton limits might be re-expressed as double-soft photon limits inside the worldline correlator; the paper lists soft-graviton theorems as a future direction without developing that identification.
  • The explicit cancellations in the appendix are shown for $N\le 2$, so a symbolic check at $N=3$ would give a concrete stress test of the arbitrary-$N$ transversality statement without requiring new ideas.
  • If a different regularization of the curved-space path integral shifted the finite remainder of the velocity self-correlation, the master formula would need scheme-dependent counterterms; comparing Eq. (37) with direct perturbative evaluation at one fixed $N$ would pin down the convention.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes tree-level scattering amplitudes for a massive scalar coupled to an arbitrary number N of photons and a single graviton, using the worldline formalism. The main result is Eq. (37): the full amplitude is written as the sum of an irreducible worldline contribution (Eq. (20)) and a reducible part constructed by a new 'tree replacement' rule (Eq. (36)), in which one photon polarization/momentum is replaced by the graviton-emission vertex. The authors verify the construction by checking on-shell transversality of the photon legs and of the graviton leg, giving explicit results for N=0,1,2 in the main text and appendices, and a general argument for arbitrary N.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a compact all-N master formula for a mixed QED-gravity tree amplitude and a replacement rule that generalizes Bern-Kosower-type constructions to graviton emission from photon lines. The explicit N=0,1,2 amplitudes, the recovery of the known photoproduction factorization for N=1, and the detailed Ward-identity checks in Appendices A and B are concrete and useful. The derivation introduces no free parameters and is self-contained except for the regularization assumption discussed below. The worldline approach here is a reasonable and novel route to these amplitudes, and the paper is a solid contribution to the literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (19)] The central step is the replacement of the curved-space graviton vertex (13) by the photon-like vertex (19), which relies on the assertion that after ghost cancellation one may set ⟨qdot^μ(τ0) qdot^ν(τ0)⟩ = -2/T δ^{μν}. This coincidence-limit prescription is stated without derivation, and it is load-bearing: Eqs. (20), (37), and the graviton transversality argument in Section 4 all depend on it. Since the paper checks amplitudes computed with this prescription against Ward identities that assume the same prescription, the N≤2 checks do not independently validate the regularization. Please provide a derivation or a precise citation showing that this replacement is exact in the presence of the photon insertions, and discuss whether point-splitting or worldline dimensional regularization could generate additional finite contact terms.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (54)] The all-N proof of the graviton Ward identity (53) is only sketched: after the shift ϵ→k0ξ, the transformed υ_i is claimed to consist of -tilde ε_i plus a term proportional to (k0+k_i)^μ that drops out by photon transversality, leaving a cancellation with the right-hand side of Eq. (36). This is plausible, but for N>2 the cancellations are not shown explicitly, and the appendix only treats N≤2. Please expand the argument to a full proof for arbitrary N, or provide an explicit check for N=3, so that the 'arbitrary N' claim is fully supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B, below Eq. (64)] The phrase 'vanishes on-sell' should read 'vanishes on-shell'.
  2. [Acknowledgments] The word 'Ackowledgments' is misspelled; it should be 'Acknowledgments'.
  3. [Eq. (20)] The notation 'with ¨Δ_{0−0′}=0' is unclear; please specify the convention used for the second derivative of the worldline Green function at coincident points, and how the δ-function contact terms are defined in the master formula.
  4. [References] Reference [35] is listed as 'in preparation'; if it remains unpublished, consider citing a more permanent source or removing the reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (37) is assembled from independent worldline and field-theory inputs, and the Ward-identity checks are consistency tests rather than fitted predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The pure N-photon master formula (Eq. (8)/(10)) is taken from earlier independent work (Daikouji et al. and Ahmadiniaz-Bashir-Schubert), and the curved-space worldline measure with Lee-Yang ghosts (Eqs. (11)-(15)) is imported from published work by Bastianelli, Corradini and van Nieuwenhuizen. Section 3.1 reduces the graviton vertex to photon-like form (Eq. (19)) by an explicit regularization statement: the ghost correlators are asserted to cancel the singular part of <qdot^mu qdot^nu>, leaving <qdot^mu qdot^nu> = -2/T delta^{munu}. Whether that coincidence-limit prescription is correct is a substantive physics assumption and a correctness risk, but it is an input to the computation, not the target result; Eqs. (19)-(20) follow algebraically from that stated assumption rather than presupposing the final amplitude. The reducible part is derived from the standard two-photon-one-graviton vertex (Eqs. (28)-(29)) combined with the Feynman-gauge photon propagator replacement (Eq. (31)), not chosen to enforce the Ward identity. Equation (37) is therefore a constructed formula, and the transversality checks in Section 4 and Appendix B evaluate that formula under k0 -> k0 xi. No parameter is fitted to those identities, and no cited result is used to forbid alternative constructions. Self-citations appear in background material and in the closed-loop analogue of Eq. (51), but the open-line identity is derived in the text and that citation is not load-bearing. Consequently there is no circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the calculation uses only the physical couplings e and kappa as inputs. The main axioms are the worldline curved-space representation, a coincidence-limit regularization, standard on-shell graviton conditions, and standard Feynman sewing. No new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The worldline path integral with Lee-Yang ghosts, Eq. (11), correctly represents the scalar propagator in a curved spacetime background.
    This is the starting point for the graviton insertion; it is established in the cited worldline literature, not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Coincidence-limit prescription <qdot^mu(tau0) qdot^nu(tau0)> = -2/T delta^munu, with ghost contributions cancelling, gives the correct effective graviton vertex operator.
    This regularization is required to reduce the graviton insertion to the photon-like operator in Eq. (19) and to obtain the master formula Eq. (20).
  • domain assumption On-shell graviton polarization is transverse and traceless, with k0 . xi = 0 and k0^2 = 0 as used in Eq. (52).
    This is the standard on-shell linearized gravity condition invoked in the diffeomorphism Ward identity checks.
  • domain assumption Reducible diagrams are obtained by inserting the two-photon-one-graviton vertex, Eq. (29), into a photon line and sewing with the Feynman-gauge photon propagator, Eq. (31).
    This is standard Feynman-diagram sewing, used to build the replacement rule in Eqs. (33)-(36).
  • domain assumption The N-photon two-scalar amplitude D^(N) satisfies on-shell photon transversality in every external photon leg.
    This known property of the Daikouji-Shino-Sumino formula is used in the general all-N Ward identity argument in Section 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compton-like scattering of a scalar particle with N photons and one graviton." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GPN2BFX3

@misc{pith2026190803425,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compton-like scattering of a scalar particle with N photons and one graviton},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GPN2BFX3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03425}
}
read the original abstract

Tree-level scattering amplitudes for a scalar particle coupled to an arbitrary number N of photons and a single graviton are computed. We employ the worldline formalism as the main tool to compute the irreducible part of the amplitude, where all the photons and the graviton are directly attached to the scalar line, then derive a tree replacement rule to construct the reducible parts of the amplitude which involve irreducible pure N-photon two-scalar amplitudes where one photon line emits the graviton. We test our construction by verifying the on-shell gauge and diffeomorphism Ward identities, at arbitrary N.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03425 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Feynman diagram representation (in configuration space) for irreducible contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Feynman diagram representation of the reducible contribution to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Irreducible contributions to the amplitude with two-photon one-graviton, which are shown here in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity,

    H. Elvang and Y. t. Huang, “Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity,” Cam- bridge University Press (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    An Operator calculus having applications in quantum electrodynamics,

    R. P. Feynman, “An Operator calculus having applications in quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. 84 (1951) 108

    work page 1951

  3. [3]

    Efficient calculation of one loop QCD amplitudes,

    Z. Bern and D. A. Kosower, “Efficient calculation of one loop QCD amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1669

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    The computation of loop amplitudes in gauge theories,

    Z. Bern and D. A. Kosower, “The computation of loop amplitudes in gauge theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 379 (1992) 451

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    String-based methods in perturbative gravity

    Z. Bern, D. C. Dunbar and T. Shimada, “String-based methods in perturbative gravity”, Phys. Lett. B 312, 277 (1993) [hep-th/9307001]

    arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    Field theory without Feynman diagrams: one loop effective actions,

    M. J. Strassler, “Field theory without Feynman diagrams: one loop effective actions,” Nucl. Phys. B385 (1992) 145 [hep-ph/9205205]

    arXiv 1992

  7. [7]

    Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,

    C. Schubert, “Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,” Phys. Rept. 355 (2001) 73 [hep-th/0101036]

    arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Worldline Green Functions for Multiloop Diagrams

    M. G. Schmidt and C. Schubert, “Worldline Green Functions for Multiloop Diagrams”, Phys. Lett. B331 69 (1994) [hep-th/9403158]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Multiloop calculations in the string inspired formalism: The Single spinor loop in QED,

    M. G. Schmidt and C. Schubert, “Multiloop calculations in the string inspired formalism: The Single spinor loop in QED,” Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 2150 [hep-th/9410100]

    1996 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Photon splitting in a strong magnetic field: Recalculation and comparison with previous calculations

    S.L. Adler and C. Schubert, “Photon splitting in a strong magnetic field: Recalculation and comparison with previous calculations”, Phys. Rev. Lett.77 (1996) 1695 [hep-th/9605035]. 18

    1996 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Constant external fields in gauge theory and the spin 0, 1/2, 1 path integrals,

    M. Reuter, M. G. Schmidt and C. Schubert, “Constant external fields in gauge theory and the spin 0, 1/2, 1 path integrals,” Annals Phys.259 (1997) 313 [hep-th/9610191]

    1997 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Quantum effective actions from nonper- turbative worldline dynamics,

    H. Gies, J. Sanchez-Guillen and R. A. Vazquez, “Quantum effective actions from nonper- turbative worldline dynamics,” JHEP0508 (2005) 067 [hep-th/0505275]

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomoge- neous fields,

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, “Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomoge- neous fields,” Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 105004 [hep-th/0507174]

    2005 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Worldline formalism in a gravitational background,

    F. Bastianelli and A. Zirotti, “Worldline formalism in a gravitational background,” Nucl. Phys. B 642 (2002) 372 [hep-th/0205182]

    2002 arXiv

  7. [15]

    One-loop quantum gravity from a worldline viewpoint,

    F. Bastianelli and R. Bonezzi, “One-loop quantum gravity from a worldline viewpoint,” JHEP 1307 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1304.7135 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [16]

    One-loop quantum gravity from the N = 4 spinning particle,

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini and E. Latini, “One-loop quantum gravity from the N = 4 spinning particle,” JHEP1911 (2019) 124 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)124 [arXiv:1909.05750 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    One loop photon-graviton mixing in an electromagnetic field: Part 1,

    F. Bastianelli and C. Schubert, “One loop photon-graviton mixing in an electromagnetic field: Part 1,” JHEP0502 (2005) 069 [gr-qc/0412095]

    2005 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Casimir effect on the worldline,

    H. Gies, K. Langfeld and L. Moyaerts, “Casimir effect on the worldline,” JHEP0306 (2003) 018 [hep-th/0303264]

    2003 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Higherspinfieldsfromaworldlineperspective,

    F.Bastianelli, O.CorradiniandE.Latini, “Higherspinfieldsfromaworldlineperspective,” JHEP 0702 (2007) 072 [hep-th/0701055]

    2007 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Effective action for higher spin fields on (A)dS backgrounds,

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini and E. Latini, “Effective action for higher spin fields on (A)dS backgrounds,” JHEP1212 (2012) 113 [arXiv:1210.4649 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Worldline approach to quantum field theories on flat manifolds with boundaries,

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini and P. A. G. Pisani, “Worldline approach to quantum field theories on flat manifolds with boundaries,” JHEP0702 (2007) 059 [hep-th/0612236]

    2007 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Worldline formalism for a confined scalar field,

    O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards, I. Huet, L. Manzo and P. Pisani, “Worldline formalism for a confined scalar field,” JHEP1908 (2019) 037 [arXiv:1905.00945 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Worldline approach to noncommutative field theory,

    R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini, S. A. Franchino Vinas and P. A. G. Pisani, “Worldline approach to noncommutative field theory,” J. Phys. A45 (2012) 405401 [arXiv:1204.1013 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    A covariant representation of the Ball-Chiu vertex,

    N. Ahmadiniaz and C. Schubert, “A covariant representation of the Ball-Chiu vertex,” Nucl. Phys. B869 (2013) 417 [arXiv:1210.2331[hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    QCD gluon vertices from the string-inspired formalism

    N. Ahmadiniaz and C. Schubert, “ QCD gluon vertices from the string-inspired formalism" Int. J. Mod. Phys. E25 (2016) 1642004 [arXiv:1811.10780[hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bern-Kosower rule for scalar QED,

    K. Daikouji, M. Shino and Y. Sumino, “Bern-Kosower rule for scalar QED,” Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 4598 [hep-ph/9508377]

    1996 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Multiphoton amplitudes and generalized Landau-Khalatnikov-Fradkin transformation in scalar QED

    N. Ahmadiniaz, A. Bashir and C. Schubert, “Multiphoton amplitudes and generalized Landau-Khalatnikov-Fradkin transformation in scalar QED”, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 045023 [arXiv:1511.05087 [hep-ph]]. 19

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Master formu- las for the dressed scalar propagator in a constant field,

    A. Ahmad, N. Ahmadiniaz, O. Corradini, S. P. Kim and C. Schubert, “Master formu- las for the dressed scalar propagator in a constant field,” Nucl. Phys. B919 (2017) 9 [arXiv:1612.02944 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Dressed scalar propagator in a non- Abelian background from the worldline formalism,

    N. Ahmadiniaz, F. Bastianelli and O. Corradini, “Dressed scalar propagator in a non- Abelian background from the worldline formalism,” Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) no.2, 025035 Addendum: [Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) no.4, 049904] [arXiv:1508.05144 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Classical And Quantum Dynamics Of Particles With Arbitrary Spin,

    V. D. Gershun and V. I. Tkach, “Classical And Quantum Dynamics Of Particles With Arbitrary Spin,” JETP Lett.29 (1979) 288 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.29 (1979) 320]

    1979

  23. [31]

    Einstein gravity from theN = 4 spinning particle,

    R. Bonezzi, A. Meyer and I. Sachs, “Einstein gravity from theN = 4 spinning particle,” JHEP 1810 (2018) 025 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)025 [arXiv:1807.07989 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Particle spin dynamics as the Grassmann variant of classical mechanics

    F. A. Berezin and M. S. Marinov, “Particle spin dynamics as the Grassmann variant of classical mechanics”, Ann. Phys. (N.Y)104 (1977) 336

    1977

  25. [33]

    Path integral representation for the relativistic particle propagators and BFV quantization,

    E. S. Fradkin and D. M. Gitman, “Path integral representation for the relativistic particle propagators and BFV quantization,” Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 3230

    1991

  26. [34]

    One-particle reducible contribution to the one-loop spinor propagator in a constant field,

    N. Ahmadiniaz, F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards and C. Schubert, “One-particle reducible contribution to the one-loop spinor propagator in a constant field,” Nucl. Phys. B 924 (2017) 377 [arXiv:1704.05040 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Ahmadiniaz, V

    N. Ahmadiniaz, V. M. Banda, F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards and C. Schubert, in preparation

  28. [36]

    Angular zeros of Brown, Mikaelian, Sahdev, and Samuel and the factorization of tree amplitudes in gauge theories,

    C. J. Goebel and F. Halzen and J. P. Leveille, “Angular zeros of Brown, Mikaelian, Sahdev, and Samuel and the factorization of tree amplitudes in gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) no. 11, 2682

    1981

  29. [37]

    Factorizationandpolarizationinlinearizedgravity,

    S.Y.Choi, J.S.ShimandH.S.Song, “Factorizationandpolarizationinlinearizedgravity,” Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 2751 [hep-th/9411092]

    1995 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Factorization in graviton scattering and the ’natural’ value of the g factor,

    B. R. Holstein, “Factorization in graviton scattering and the ’natural’ value of the g factor,” Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 085002

    2006

  31. [39]

    On the low-energy limit of one-loop photon-graviton amplitudes,

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. M. Dávila and C. Schubert, “On the low-energy limit of one-loop photon-graviton amplitudes,” Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 345 [arXiv:1202.4502 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Graviton-Photon Scattering,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, B. R. Holstein, L. PlantÃľ and P. Vanhove, “Graviton-Photon Scattering,” Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) no.6, 064008 [arXiv:1410.4148 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    GravitationalComptonScat- tering from the Worldline Formalism,

    N.Ahmadiniaz, O.Corradini, J.M.DávilaandC.Schubert, “GravitationalComptonScat- tering from the Worldline Formalism,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser.43 (2016) 1660201

    2016

  34. [42]

    Path integrals and anomalies in curved space,

    F. Bastianelli and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Path integrals and anomalies in curved space,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2006)

    2006

  35. [43]

    Worldgraph Approach to Yang-Mills Amplitudes from N=2 Spinning Particle,

    P. Dai, Y. t. Huang and W. Siegel, “Worldgraph Approach to Yang-Mills Amplitudes from N=2 Spinning Particle,” JHEP0810 (2008) 027 [arXiv:0807.0391 [hep-th]]. 20

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Wordline Computation of Tree-level QED and QCD Amplitudes and Transversality,

    F. M. Balli, “Wordline Computation of Tree-level QED and QCD Amplitudes and Transversality,” unpublished M.Sc. thesis

  37. [45]

    Dimensional regularization of nonlinear sigma models on a finite time interval,

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Dimensional regularization of nonlinear sigma models on a finite time interval,” Phys. Lett. B494 (2000) 161 [hep- th/0008045]

    2000

  38. [46]

    The Path integral for a particle in curved spaces and Weyl anomalies,

    F. Bastianelli, “The Path integral for a particle in curved spaces and Weyl anomalies,” Nucl. Phys. B376 (1992) 113 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90070-R [hep-th/9112035]

    1992 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Trace anomalies from quantum mechanics,

    F. Bastianelli and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Trace anomalies from quantum mechanics,” Nucl. Phys. B389 (1993) 53 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90285-W [hep-th/9208059]

    1993 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Photons and Gravitons in S - Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conser- vation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,

    S. Weinberg, “Photons and Gravitons in S - Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conser- vation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,” Phys. Rev.135 (1964) B1049

    1964

  41. [49]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,” arXiv:1404.4091 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,

    A. Strominger, “Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,” arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]. 21

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.