Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Manifestly duality-invariant interactions in diverse dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every U(1) duality-invariant p-form gauge theory in d=4p can be rewritten so that its self-interaction is manifestly U(1)-invariant.

desk verdict A plausible but unproven higher-dimensional extension of the Ivanov-Zupnik trick; the central equivalence is asserted, not shown, so the paper is a solid draft rather than a finished result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04120 v2 pith:HJYO5GI6 submitted 2019-08-12 hep-th

Sergei M. Kuzenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords U(1)dualityinvariancep-formgaugetheoryself-dualityequationauxiliaryantisymmetrictensornonlinearelectrodynamicshigherdimensionsduality-invariantinteractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that every U(1) duality-invariant nonlinear theory of a gauge (2p−1)-form in d=4p dimensions can be recast as a field theory with manifestly U(1)-invariant self-interactions, extending the known four-dimensional auxiliary-tensor construction. The author introduces a Lagrangian that is quadratic in the field strength plus an auxiliary antisymmetric rank-n tensor, with a self-interaction constrained by a linear condition. He argues that this condition is equivalent to the standard nonlinear self-duality equation, so that duality invariance of the physical theory becomes a simple phase invariance in the auxiliary formulation. This matters because the reformulation offers a practical generating scheme for duality-invariant models, including higher-derivative systems, in arbitrary d=4p dimensions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the unconstrained auxiliary rank-$n$ antisymmetric tensor $V_{a_1\ldots a_n}$ and its split into chiral halves $V_\pm$. The reformulated Lagrangian (2.4) is at most quadratic in the physical field strength; all nonlinearity lives in $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}}(V)$. The mechanism is the equivalence between the nonlinear self-duality equation on $L(F)$ and the U(1) phase-invariance condition (2.10) on $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}}(V_+,V_-)$, which turns a hard functional equation into a simple symmetry requirement. The physical theory is recovered by solving the algebraic auxiliary-field equation of motion for $V$.

What would settle it

Integrate out $V$ from a concrete U(1)-invariant $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}}(V_+,V_-)$ in $d=8$ and check whether the resulting $L(F)$ satisfies the self-duality equation (2.1); if any invariant interaction yields a Lagrangian that violates the equation, the claimed equivalence fails. Because the equivalence is asserted without derivation, this check is the decisive test.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the full nonlinear self-duality equation, $\widetilde{G}\cdot G + \widetilde{F}\cdot F = 0$, is equivalent to the linear condition $\widetilde{V}^{a_1\ldots a_n}\partial \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}}/\partial V^{a_1\ldots a_n} = 0$ on the self-interaction in the auxiliary-field Lagrangian (2.4). In terms of the (anti)self-dual parts $V_\pm = \tfrac12(V \pm i\widetilde{V})$, this condition states that $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}}(V_+,V_-)$ is invariant under $V_+ \to e^{i\phi}V_+$, $V_- \to e^{-i\phi}V_-$. Consequently, every U(1) duality-invariant model in $d=4p$ is generated, after integrating out $V$, by a manifestly U(1)-invariant interaction of one auxiliary antisymmetric tensor. In four dimensions this reproduces the known form $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}} = f(\nu\bar{\nu})$, while in higher dimensions richer invariants such as $f(V_+\cdot V_+\, V_-\cdot V_-)$ become possible.

Load-bearing premise

The reformulation rests on the assertion, stated in the text only as 'It may be shown', that the self-duality equation (2.1) is equivalent to the condition (2.7), together with the assumption that the auxiliary field equation can be solved to eliminate V; neither is demonstrated by an explicit computation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any U(1) duality-invariant model in $d=4p$ can be generated by choosing a manifestly U(1)-invariant interaction $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}}(V_+,V_-)$, reducing the search for duality-invariant theories to a symmetry condition.
  • The construction covers higher-derivative duality-invariant systems, since the auxiliary formulation does not restrict the derivative order of the self-interaction.
  • Beyond four dimensions, new classes of duality-invariant interactions exist that are not of the simple one-variable form $f(\nu\bar{\nu})$ found in $d=4$.
  • The auxiliary-tensor formulation provides an alternative to the approach of [31] for determining all possible manifestly U(1) duality-invariant self-interactions in $d=4p$ dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The same auxiliary-tensor construction should extend to U(k) duality-invariant systems of $k$ gauge $(2p-1)$-forms in $d=4p$; the author lists this as a natural generalisation but does not spell out the invariant condition for $k>1$.
  • Inference: Because the equivalence is asserted but not shown, a direct systematic test — generating the most general low-order U(1)-invariant $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}}$ in $d=8$ and checking the self-duality equation by explicit integration — would settle the claim and may reveal the missing proof.
  • Inference: The manifest phase-invariance form could make higher-dimensional analogues of the four-dimensional tree-level helicity-conservation argument for duality-invariant theories straightforward, since the duality action becomes a simple linear phase rotation on $V_\pm$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generalization of the Ivanov-Zupnik (IZ) approach to manifestly U(1) duality-invariant theories of gauge (2p-1)-forms in d=4p dimensions. It introduces a Lagrangian L(F,V) that is quadratic in the field strength F and an auxiliary rank-n antisymmetric tensor V, with self-interactions encoded in L_int(V). The central claim is that the self-duality equation (2.1) for the original Lagrangian L(F) is equivalent to the simple condition (2.7) on L_int, namely invariance under the linear U(1) transformation V -> e^{i\phi}V_+ + e^{-i\phi}V_-. The paper further states that in d>4 the space of allowed self-interactions is larger than in four dimensions, where the general solution is f(ν\barν). The note concludes by listing possible generalizations to gravity, dilaton couplings, higher derivatives, and U(k) duality-invariant systems.

Significance. If the main equivalence is proven, the paper provides a universal and practical formalism for constructing U(1) duality-invariant models of higher-rank gauge fields, directly extending a methodology that has proven influential in four-dimensional nonlinear electrodynamics and its supersymmetric extensions. The explicit reduction of duality invariance to a simple algebraic condition on an auxiliary-field self-interaction is conceptually attractive and would be a useful contribution. The manuscript does not contain machine-checked proofs, numerical checks, or falsifiable predictions; its value rests entirely on the analytic derivation, and for the central claim that derivation is currently only asserted, not demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, eqs. (2.1)-(2.7)] The equivalence between the self-duality equation (2.1) for L(F) and the condition (2.7) on L_int(V) is the central result of the paper, but it is introduced with 'It may be shown' and no derivation is given. From (2.4) one obtains \tilde{G} = F - V; substituting into (2.1) gives an expression involving F, \tilde{F}, V and \tilde{V}, and the auxiliary equation (2.6) is then to be used to eliminate F. This computation is not displayed, and it is not entirely trivial because (2.6) is nonlinear in V. The authors should supply the derivation or a precise reference to it; without this step the reformulation is not established.
  2. [Section 2, after eq. (2.5)] The solvability of the auxiliary-field equation of motion (2.6) is explicitly assumed. The sentence 'It is assumed that the equation of motion for V ... allows one to integrate out the auxiliary field V to result with L(F)' is a nontrivial assumption: for a generic L_int, the Legendre transform V(F) may fail to exist or be multi-valued. The paper should state conditions on L_int (for example, convexity or invertibility of the second variation) and verify them at least for the explicit class f(V_+·V_+ V_-·V_-). Without such a check, the claimed coverage of arbitrary duality-invariant models is conditional on an unverified property.
  3. [Section 2, after eq. (2.10)] The statement 'However more general self-interactions become possible beyond four dimensions' is central to the paper's claim that the formalism generates a wider class of models in d>4, yet no example or classification is provided. The authors should construct at least one explicit U(1)-invariant L_int in d>4 that is not of the form f(V_+·V_+ V_-·V_-), and ideally demonstrate that the resulting L(F) satisfies the self-duality equation (2.1). This would also clarify the structural difference from the four-dimensional case, where V_+·V_- vanishes and the invariant ring collapses to f(ν\barν).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 2] The abstract claims the reformulation is 'suitable to generate arbitrary duality-invariant nonlinear systems including those with higher derivatives,' but the paper does not explain how higher derivatives can arise from an auxiliary field V whose self-interaction is an ordinary function without derivatives. To match the abstract, the authors should either give a higher-derivative example or qualify the claim to the class of two-derivative systems.
  2. [Section 2, after eq. (2.11)] The sentence 'Equation (2.7) tells us that L_int(V) duality invariant' is missing a verb; it should read 'is duality invariant.'
  3. [Section 2, around eq. (2.8)] The authors should spell out the identity \tilde{\tilde{V}} = -V, which holds for n even in Lorentzian signature and underlies the definition of the (anti)self-dual components V_± in eq. (2.8). This identity is used implicitly and its sign convention should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Footnote 3] There is a typo: 'thoes' should be 'those.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the load-bearing (2.1)-(2.7) equivalence is asserted rather than derived, which is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central step is the claimed equivalence between the self-duality equation (2.1) and the condition (2.7) on L_int(V). This is presented with 'It may be shown that the self-duality equation (2.1) is equivalent to the following condition on the self-interaction in (2.4)' and is not derived in the paper. That is an unproved assertion and therefore a completeness/rigor gap, not a circular reduction. The paper does not define L_int in terms of L(F), does not fit any parameter to a subset of data, and does not import a uniqueness theorem from the author's prior work. The relation between L(F) and L_int(V) is mediated by the Legendre transform (2.6), whose solvability is explicitly stated as an assumption ('It is assumed that the equation of motion for V ... allows one to integrate out the auxiliary field V'), so the paper is transparent that the reformulation covers only models for which this elimination works. The self-citations [8,9,25] supply notation, conventions and four-dimensional formalism, but they are not used to assume the higher-dimensional equivalence. Consequently, no step in the paper reduces an output to an input by construction; the unproved equivalence should be handled as a derivation-gap concern in the correctness pass rather than as circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted or chosen by hand; the construction has no dimensionless parameters beyond what enters L_int, which is an arbitrary U(1)-invariant function rather than a fitted quantity. The auxiliary antisymmetric tensor V_{a1...an} in eq (2.4) is a mathematical device inherited from [1,2], not a postulated physical entity, and it is eliminated by its own equation of motion (2.6).

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Equivalence of the on-shell self-duality equation (2.1) for L(F) with the algebraic condition (2.7) on L_int(V), asserted by 'It may be shown'.
    This unproved lemma is the load-bearing step of the reformulation; the text between eqs (2.6) and (2.7) asserts it without displaying the computation, and no reference to an existing proof in d=4p is given.
  • domain assumption The auxiliary field V can be integrated out: the equation of motion (2.6) is solvable and yields L(F) from L(F,V).
    Stated as an assumption immediately after eq (2.5): 'It is assumed that the equation of motion for V ... allows one to integrate out the auxiliary field V to result with L(F).' No invertibility or branch-selection analysis is provided.
  • domain assumption For a single gauge (n-1)-form in d=2n, the maximal duality group is U(1) only for n even, hence the restriction to d=4p.
    Cites Araki-Tanii [14] and Section 8 of Kuzenko-Theisen [9]; this is the structural reason the paper treats d=4p rather than all even dimensions.
  • standard math In four dimensions the general solution of the U(1) invariance condition is L_int = f(νν̄), ν = V^{αβ}V_{αβ}.
    Quoted as eq (1.7) from Ivanov-Zupnik [1,2]; the paper relies on this classification to connect its criterion (2.10) with the known 4D result. No derivation is repeated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Manifestly duality-invariant interactions in diverse dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HJYO5GI6

@misc{pith2026190804120,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Manifestly duality-invariant interactions in diverse dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HJYO5GI6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04120}
}
abstract

As an extension of the Ivanov-Zupnik approach to self-dual nonlinear electrodynamics in four dimensions [1,2], we reformulate U(1) duality-invariant nonlinear models for a gauge $(2p-1)$-form in $d=4p$ dimensions as field theories with manifestly U(1) invariant self-interactions. This reformulation is suitable to generate arbitrary duality-invariant nonlinear systems including those with higher derivatives.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonlinear self-duality for arbitrary spin, superspin, and supersymmetry type

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Every U(1) duality-invariant (super)conformal gauge theory of arbitrary (super)spin obeys a universal self-duality equation, is Legendre self-dual, and (for spin > 1) lives only on conformally flat backgrounds.

  2. On nonlinear self-duality in $4p$ dimensions

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Every 4D self-dual nonlinear electrodynamics model extends, via the same L(S,P) ansatz and equation, to U(1) duality-invariant (2p−1)-form theories in 4p dimensions (already in [19]); new here are a ModMax-type deform...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [31]

    Duality invariant self-int eractions of abelian p-forms in arbitrary dimensions,

    G. Buratti, K. Lechner and L. Melotti, “Duality invariant self-int eractions of abelian p-forms in arbitrary dimensions,” arXiv:1906.07094 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1906

  2. [1]

    New representation for Lagran gians of self-dual nonlinear electro- dynamics,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “New representation for Lagran gians of self-dual nonlinear electro- dynamics,” hep-th/0202203. 3It is worth pointing out that in four dimensions a hybrid formulation ha s been developed [34] which combines the powerful features of the IZ approach with thoes ad vocated in [32, 33]. 4

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    New approach to nonlinear electr odynamics: Dualities as symme- tries of interaction,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “New approach to nonlinear electr odynamics: Dualities as symme- tries of interaction,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 67, 2188 (2004) [Yad. Fiz. 67, 2212 (2004)] [hep-th/0303192]

    arXiv 2004

  4. [3]

    Duality rotations for interacting field s,

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Duality rotations for interacting field s,” Nucl. Phys. B193, 221 (1981)

    work page 1981

  5. [4]

    Electric-magnetic duality rota tions in nonlinear electrodynam- ics,

    G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, “Electric-magnetic duality rota tions in nonlinear electrodynam- ics,” Nucl. Phys. B454, 185 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9506035]

    arXiv 1995

  6. [5]

    SL(2,R) invariance of non-linea r electrodynamics coupled to an axion and a dilaton,

    G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, “SL(2,R) invariance of non-linea r electrodynamics coupled to an axion and a dilaton,” Phys. Lett. B365, 46 (1996) [hep-th/9509141]

    arXiv 1996

  7. [6]

    Self-duality in nonlinear electromagne tism,

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Self-duality in nonlinear electromagne tism,” in Supersymme- try and Quantum Field Theory , J. Wess and V. P. Akulov (Eds.), Springer Verlag, 1998, p. 121 [arXiv:hep-th/9705226]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Nonlinear electromagnetic self-dualit y and Legendre transforma- tions,

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Nonlinear electromagnetic self-dualit y and Legendre transforma- tions,” in Duality and Supersymmetric Theories , D. I. Olive and P. C. West eds., Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1999, p. 33 [hep-th/9712103]

    arXiv 1999

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    Supersymmetric duality rotation s,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Supersymmetric duality rotation s,” JHEP 0003, 034 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0001068]

    2000 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Nonlinear self-duality and supers ymmetry,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Nonlinear self-duality and supers ymmetry,” Fortsch. Phys. 49, 273 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0007231]

    2001 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Nonlinear self-duality and s upergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. A. McCarthy, “Nonlinear self-duality and s upergravity,” JHEP 0302, 038 (2003) [hep-th/0212039]

    2003 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Nonlinear self-duality in N=2 supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Nonlinear self-duality in N=2 supergravity,” JHE P 1206, 012 (2012) [arXiv:1202.0126 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [12]

    N=2 supersymmetry and U(1)-duality,

    J. Broedel, J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and R. Ro iban, “N=2 supersymmetry and U(1)-duality,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 125036 (2012) [arXiv:1202.0014 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Tanii, Introduction to supergravities in diverse dimensions , hep-th/9802138

    Y. Tanii, Introduction to supergravities in diverse dimensions , hep-th/9802138

    arXiv

  7. [14]

    Duality symmetries in non-linear gauge the ories,

    M. Araki and Y. Tanii, “Duality symmetries in non-linear gauge the ories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14, 1139 (1999) [hep-th/9808029]

    1999 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Nonlinear self- duality in even dimensions,

    P. Aschieri, D. Brace, B. Morariu and B. Zumino, “Nonlinear self- duality in even dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 574, 551 (2000) [hep-th/9909021]

    2000 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Duality rotations in nonlin ear electrodynamics and in extended supergravity,

    P. Aschieri, S. Ferrara and B. Zumino, “Duality rotations in nonlin ear electrodynamics and in extended supergravity,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 31, 625 (2008) [arXiv:0807.4039 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Born-Infeld with higher derivatives,

    W. Chemissany, R. Kallosh and T. Ortin, “Born-Infeld with higher derivatives,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 046002 (2012) [arXiv:1112.0332 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Constitutive relations and Schro edinger’s formulation of nonlinear elec- tromagnetic theories,

    P. Aschieri and S. Ferrara, “Constitutive relations and Schro edinger’s formulation of nonlinear elec- tromagnetic theories,” JHEP 1305, 087 (2013) [arXiv:1302.4737 [hep-th]]. 5

    2013 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Constitutive relations , off shell duality rotations and the hypergeometric form of Born-Infeld theory,

    P. Aschieri, S. Ferrara and S. Theisen, “Constitutive relations , off shell duality rotations and the hypergeometric form of Born-Infeld theory,” Springer Proc. Phy s. 153, 23 (2014) [arXiv:1310.2803 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [20]

    N=3 supersymmetric Born-Inf eld theory,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “N=3 supersymmetric Born-Inf eld theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 618, 3 (2001) [hep-th/0110074]

    2001 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Self-duality, helicity conservation and normal o rdering in nonlinear QED,

    J. Novotn´ y, “Self-duality, helicity conservation and normal o rdering in nonlinear QED,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no. 8, 085015 (2018) [arXiv:1806.02167 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Counterterms vs. dualities,

    G. Bossard and H. Nicolai, “Counterterms vs. dualities,” JHEP 1108, 074 (2011) [arXiv:1105.1273 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Covariant proced ures for perturbative non-linear deformation of duality-invariant theories,

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and R. Roiban, “Covariant proced ures for perturbative non-linear deformation of duality-invariant theories,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 025007 (2012) [arXiv:1108.4390 [hep- th]]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Bispinor auxiliary fields in duality-in variant electrodynamics revisited,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “Bispinor auxiliary fields in duality-in variant electrodynamics revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 87, no. 6, 065023 (2013) [arXiv:1212.6637 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Duality rotations in supersymmetric nonlinear e lectrodynamics revisited,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Duality rotations in supersymmetric nonlinear e lectrodynamics revisited,” JHEP 1303, 153 (2013) [arXiv:1301.5194 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Auxiliary superfields in N=1 supersymmetric self-dual electrodynamics,

    E. Ivanov, O. Lechtenfeld and B. Zupnik, “Auxiliary superfields in N=1 supersymmetric self-dual electrodynamics,” JHEP 1305, 133 (2013) [arXiv:1303.5962 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  20. [27]

    N=8 supergravity in six dimensions,

    Y. Tanii, “N=8 supergravity in six dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B145, 197 (1984)

    1984

  21. [28]

    Hidden Non-compact Symmetries In String Theory,

    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, “Hidden Non-compact Symmetries In String Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B308, 436 (1988)

    1988

  22. [29]

    Dualisation of dualit ies. I,

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. L¨ u and C. N. Pope, “Dualisation of dualit ies. I,” Nucl. Phys. B523, 73 (1998) [hep-th/9710119]

    1998 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Dualisation of dualit ies. II: Twisted self-duality of doubled fields and superdualities,

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. L¨ u and C. N. Pope, “Dualisation of dualit ies. II: Twisted self-duality of doubled fields and superdualities,” Nucl. Phys. B535, 242 (1998) [hep-th/9806106]

    1998 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Duality symmetric actions w ith manifest space-time symme- tries,

    P. Pasti, D. P. Sorokin and M. Tonin, “Duality symmetric actions w ith manifest space-time symme- tries,” Phys. Rev. D 52, 4277 (1995) [hep-th/9506109]

    1995 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Covariant actions for models with nonlinear twisted self-duality,

    P. Pasti, D. Sorokin and M. Tonin, “Covariant actions for models with nonlinear twisted self-duality,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 045013 (2012) [arXiv:1205.4243 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Unifying the PST and the auxiliary tensor field formulations of 4D self-duality,

    E. A. Ivanov, A. J. Nurmagambetov and B. M. Zupnik, “Unifying the PST and the auxiliary tensor field formulations of 4D self-duality,” Phys. Lett. B 731, 298 (2014) [arXiv:1401.7834 [hep-th]]. 6

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.