Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Type III Seesaw for Neutrino Masses in $U(1)_{B-L}$ Model with Multi-component Dark Matter

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A gauged B-L seesaw can naturally produce two stable dark matter fermions by cancelling anomalies with fractional charges.

desk verdict The advertised remnant Z2 x Z'2 DM stability is contradicted by the model's own scalar charges (gcd=1), and Eq. (24) violates U(1)_B-L; the central 'natural stability' claim collapses. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04308 v2 pith:2MAXNYOM submitted 2019-08-12 hep-ph

Anirban Biswas , Debasish Borah , Dibyendu Nanda This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 12.60.Fr12.60.-i14.60.Pq14.60.St
keywords typeIIIseesawgaugedU(1)B-Lsymmetryanomalycancellationfractionalchargestwo-componentdarkmatterdiscretegaugefermiontripletneutrinomass
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a gauged $U(1)_{B-L}$ extension of the Standard Model in which light neutrino masses come from the type III seesaw mechanism. The three fermion triplets required by the seesaw introduce new triangle anomalies, and the paper shows these anomalies can be cancelled by four singlet chiral fermions carrying fractional $B-L$ charges. Those four fermions pair into two Dirac fermions, and the scalar sector is arranged so that each Dirac fermion is separately stable under a leftover $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}'_2$ discrete symmetry. The result is a two-component dark matter scenario that arises from anomaly cancellation rather than from added ad-hoc symmetries, and the paper demonstrates that the combined relic density, direct detection limits, and collider constraints still leave viable parameter space.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the pairing of anomaly-cancellation conditions with a specially chosen scalar spectrum. The anomaly equations $[SU(2)_L]^2 U(1)_{B-L} = 2 n_\Sigma - 2 n_1 = 0$ and the cubic and gravitational anomaly conditions fix the fractional $B-L$ charges; the scalar charges $1, 4, 2$ are then chosen so that the four chiral singlets become two massive Dirac fermions with diagonal Yukawa couplings, and the same charges ensure that after spontaneous breaking the unbroken subgroup is $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}'_2$ rather than nothing. This discrete remnant is what turns the two Dirac fermions into stable dark matter candidates.

What would settle it

A direct group-theoretic computation of the discrete subgroup left unbroken by the vacuum expectation values of the three scalars with $B-L$ charges $1$, $4$, and $2$ would settle the central claim. If that computation yields no non-trivial $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}'_2$ with the stated parity assignments on $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$, the two dark matter candidates are not gauge-protected and the two-component scenario collapses; the required charges are given in the paper, so this is a finite algebraic check.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an anomaly-free gauged $U(1)_{B-L}$ implementation of type III seesaw can be built with three fermion triplets—two with $B-L$ charge $-1$ for neutrino mass and one with charge $+2$ for anomaly cancellation—together with four singlet chiral fermions carrying $B-L$ charges $-7/5$, $-2/5$, $6/5$, and $-14/5$. Once the singlets are given masses by scalars with charges $1$ and $4$, they form two diagonal Dirac fermions $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$; with the third scalar of charge $2$, the theory breaks to a residual $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}'_2$ under which $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$ carry $(-,+)$ and $(+,-)$, making both absolutely stable. The triplets generate the light neutrino mass matrix through type III seesaw, predicting one massless neutrino, and the paper shows that the two-component relic abundance can match the observed dark matter density across a range of masses and couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The whole two-component dark matter scenario depends on the assumption that after the $U(1)_{B-L}$ scalars acquire vacuum expectation values, a remnant $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}'_2$ gauge symmetry survives with the exact parity assignments $(-,+)$ and $(+,-)$ on the two Dirac fermions; the paper asserts this remnant rather than deriving it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The model predicts two absolutely stable dark matter fermions whose combined relic density can be tuned to the observed cosmic abundance for broad ranges of dark matter mass.
  • The new $Z_{B-L}$ gauge boson provides an $s$-channel annihilation portal and makes the model highly sensitive to direct-detection constraints, so current limits already remove most of the scanned parameter space.
  • At hadron colliders, fermion triplets can be produced through on-shell $Z_{B-L}$ exchange, enhancing pair production relative to ordinary type III seesaw and producing long-lived charged tracks.
  • The two-triplet seesaw predicts one massless light neutrino, a concrete consequence that future neutrino experiments can probe.
  • Next-generation direct-detection experiments can probe most of the surviving parameter region, leaving a small but testable window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the same anomaly-driven stabilization could be transplanted to other Abelian gauge extensions of the Standard Model; any model whose anomaly-cancelling fermions pair diagonally into two stable Dirac states with a residual discrete symmetry would automatically provide two-component dark matter.
  • Inference: a systematic computation of the unbroken discrete subgroup for general scalar charge assignments would reveal whether the stability mechanism is a special accident of the charges $1, 4, 2$ or a generic feature of this scalar sector.
  • Inference: the model's prediction of a massless lightest neutrino could be confronted with future neutrino-mass measurements and neutrinoless double beta decay searches, which the paper mentions only briefly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a gauged U(1)_{B-L} extension of the Standard Model in which three SU(2)_L triplet fermions implement the type III seesaw mechanism. To cancel the resulting anomalies, four SM-singlet chiral fermions with fractional B-L charges are introduced; they are paired into two Dirac fermions ξ1 and ξ2. Three singlet scalars φ1, φ2, φ3 with charges 1, 4, 2 break U(1)_{B-L}. The central claim is that a remnant Z2 × Z'2 gauge symmetry keeps ξ1 and ξ2 absolutely stable, yielding two-component dark matter without an ad-hoc discrete symmetry. The paper then solves coupled Boltzmann equations for the two DM candidates, applies relic-density, direct-detection, perturbativity, and collider constraints, and discusses disappearing-track signatures of the triplet fermions.

Significance. If the symmetry mechanism worked, the paper would offer a genuine link between anomaly cancellation, neutrino mass, and two-component dark matter, and the numerical phenomenology is carried out with standard tools (FeynRules, CalcHEP, micrOMEGAs) and with explicit Boltzmann equations. The anomaly-cancellation setup is checkable and the collider discussion is sensible. However, the advertised gauge protection of the DM candidates is not only underived but contradicted by the field content and charges given in the paper, and the singlet Yukawa Lagrangian in Eq. (24) is not gauge invariant. As a result, the central claim of the paper does not hold as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, footnote 4; Tables I and II; text after Eq. (16)] The claimed remnant Z2 × Z'2 symmetry is not derived and cannot arise from the given charge assignments. For a single U(1) broken by scalars with integer charges q_i, the unbroken discrete gauge subgroup is the cyclic group of order gcd(q_i). Here q(φ1)=1, q(φ2)=4, q(φ3)=2 and the authors assume u1=u2=u3=u with all three VEVs nonzero, so gcd(1,4,2)=1 and only the identity survives. A product Z2 × Z'2 is non-cyclic and therefore cannot be a subgroup of U(1). Consequently ξ1 and ξ2 are not protected by a remnant gauge symmetry, and the 'natural' two-component DM scenario collapses. The paper also does not identify any alternative (e.g., accidental) symmetry; the scalar cross-couplings δ and ζ in Eq. (14) connect all three φ_i, so no independent global U(1) charges are evident.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (24) with Tables I and II] The singlet Yukawa terms in Eq. (24) are not invariant under U(1)_{B-L}. Using the charges from Table I, the Y1 term has Q(N1L)+Q(N1R)+Q(φ1†) = -7/5 -2/5 -1 = -14/5 ≠ 0, and the Y2 term has Q(N2L)+Q(N2R)+Q(φ2) = 6/5 -14/5 + 4 = 12/5 ≠ 0. Thus the Lagrangian L_Singlet written in Eq. (24) is inconsistent with the stated gauge symmetry, and the subsequent mass terms for ξ1 and ξ2 are not gauge invariant. This is not a presentation issue: the model as defined does not exist.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (24)] The notation /D for the slashed covariant derivative is nonstandard; the usual ot D would be clearer.
  2. [Section VII, Table III and Figs. 4–6] The benchmark parameters are inconsistent between Table III and the figure captions: Table III sets Mψ2 = 750 GeV + Mψ3 and Mψ1 = 1.5 TeV + Mψ3, whereas the captions of Figs. 4–6 fix Mψ1 = 1.5 TeV and Mψ2 = 2 TeV independently.
  3. [Acknowledgments] There is a duplicated 'for for' in the acknowledgments.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract and conclusion state that ξ1 and ξ2 are 'naturally stable by virtue of a remnant Z2 × Z'2 symmetry', but this assertion appears only as a footnote in Section III and is never derived; given its centrality, it should be a demonstrated result rather than an assumption.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The advertised remnant Z2×Z′2 DM-stability symmetry is imposed by the charge choice, not derived; the 'natural two-component DM' claim is circular.

  1. self definitional [Section III, footnote 4 (p. 15); abstract and Section IX conclusion.]
    "Actually, we consider the B−L charges of φ1, φ2 and φ3 in such a way that U(1)B−L breaks into a Z2× Z′2 symmetry where ξ1 and ξ2 have following charges (−, +) and (+, −) under the Z2× Z′2 symmetry respectively."

    The abstract and conclusion present ξ1 and ξ2 as 'naturally stable by virtue of a remnant Z2×Z′2 symmetry,' i.e. as a first-principles outcome of anomaly cancellation plus gauge-symmetry breaking. But the only derivation offered is the footnote's statement that the B−L charges were chosen 'in such a way' that this symmetry results. That makes the stability pattern an input, not an output: the charge assignments and scalar content are selected to produce exactly the discrete charges (−,+) and (+,−). The reduction is direct—the predicted remnant symmetry is the design criterion for the input charges.

full rationale

The relic-density and neutrino-mass parts of the paper are not circular: the relic density is obtained by solving Boltzmann equations and then constraining parameters with the Planck abundance, which is standard fitting rather than a prediction built from the fit; the light-neutrino mass matrix is a textbook type-III seesaw expression with no dependence on the DM parameters. The anomaly-cancellation solution is a genuine constraint and is not fitted to DM observables. The one load-bearing step that reduces by construction is the residual Z2×Z′2 stability claim: footnote 4 states that the B−L charges were chosen so that this symmetry arises, and the conclusion then presents the resulting stability as a prediction. This is self-definitional, because the desired discrete charges are the selection criterion for the input charges. In addition, the Yukawa terms of Eq. (24) are not invariant under the tabulated U(1)B−L charges (the charge sums are −14/5 for Y1N1LN1Rφ1† and 12/5 for Y2N2LN2Rφ2), which independently undermines the Dirac-mass/DM construction; this is a correctness issue rather than a circularity, but it reinforces the conclusion that the central 'natural stability' claim is not derived. The self-citations [47], [104], and [105] are used for context and formalism and are not load-bearing. Score 6 because the central advertised prediction—gauge-protected two-component dark matter—reduces to an imposed charge choice, while the rest of the analysis has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 4 invented entities

The model introduces a large number of new fields and parameters. The central claims rest on the anomaly cancellation conditions and on the asserted residual discrete symmetry that stabilizes the DM candidates. The latter is not demonstrated and is the weakest point.

free parameters (4)
  • g_BL = scanned over (0.0001, 1)
    The new gauge coupling controls DM annihilation and direct detection; constrained by relic density and XENON1T.
  • M_ZBL = scanned over (100 GeV, 10 TeV)
    Mass of the new gauge boson; constrained by LEP and LHC bounds.
  • Yukawa couplings y_Σ^αβ = fine-tuned to <= 10^-4
    Required to fit neutrino mass scale with TeV-scale triplets.
  • singlet scalar mixing angles = set to 0.2 in scans
    Chosen to satisfy scalar mixing bounds; not fitted.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard anomaly cancellation conditions for U(1)^3 and gravity-U(1) anomalies
    The model is built on the requirement that all triangle anomalies vanish.
  • domain assumption The B-L charge assignments for new fermions are consistent with a compact U(1) gauge group
    Fractional charges like 7/5 require a specific normalization of the U(1) charge lattice.
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar potential has a minimum with VEVs u1=u2=u3=u
    The paper assumes equal VEVs for calculational simplicity.
  • ad hoc to paper The remnant Z2 x Z'2 symmetry protects the DM candidates
    This is the central stability condition, but it is only asserted and not derived.
invented entities (4)
  • fermion triplets Σ1, Σ2, Σ3 independent evidence
    purpose: Generate light neutrino masses via type III seesaw and cancel [SU(2)_L]^2 U(1)_{B-L} anomaly
    Charged components give disappearing track signatures at LHC.
  • singlet fermions N1L, N1R, N2L, N2R independent evidence
    purpose: Cancel U(1)^3 and gravity anomalies; form two DM candidates
    They are DM candidates with predicted relic density and direct detection cross-sections.
  • scalars φ1, φ2, φ3 independent evidence
    purpose: Break U(1)_{B-L} and give masses to new fermions
    Their VEVs set the Z_BL mass and affect DM annihilation; they mix with the SM Higgs.
  • Z_BL gauge boson independent evidence
    purpose: Mediator of the new B-L force
    Searchable as dilepton resonance at LHC.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Type III Seesaw for Neutrino Masses in $U(1)_{B-L}$ Model with Multi-component Dark Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2MAXNYOM

@misc{pith2026190804308,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Type III Seesaw for Neutrino Masses in $U(1)_B-L$ Model with Multi-component Dark Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2MAXNYOM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04308}
}
abstract

We propose a $B-L$ gauged extension of the Standard Model where light neutrino masses arise from type III seesaw mechanism. Unlike the minimal $B-L$ model with three right handed neutrinos having unit lepton number each, the model with three fermion triplets is however not anomaly free. We show that the leftover triangle anomalies can be cancelled by two neutral Dirac fermions having fractional $B-L$ charges, both of which are naturally stable by virtue of a remnant $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}'_2$ symmetry, naturally leading to a two component dark matter scenario without any ad-hoc symmetries. We constrain the model from all relevant phenomenological constraints including dark matter properties. Light neutrino mass and collider prospects are also discussed briefly. Due to additional neutral gauge bosons, the fermion triplets in type III seesaw can have enhanced production cross section in collider experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04308 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Evolution of comoving number densities of both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Feynman diagrams for all possible annihilation channels of two DM candidates. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Feynman diagrams for spin-independent elastic scattering processes of DM with nucleons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Relic abundance of two DM candidates with degenerate masses keeping all other model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Relic abundance of two DM candidates with non-degenerate masses: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Relic abundance of two DM candidates with non-degenerate masses ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Scan plot showing the parameter space in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Scan plot showing the parameter space in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Effective spin-independent scattering cross section off nucleons for individual DM can [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Summary plot showing the allowed points with and without applying the direct detection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Left panel: Plot showing improvement in production cross-section of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prospecting bipartite Dark Matter through Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-component dark matter model with an inert triplet scalar and a singlet fermion can explain the relic abundance while producing a strong electroweak phase transition and gravitational wave signals detectable by L...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Tanabashi et al.,Review of Particle Physics, Phys

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, M. Tanabashi et al.,Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 3 030001

    2018

  2. [2]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hernandez-Cabezudo, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination ofθ23,δCP, and the mass ordering, JHEP 01 (2019) 106, [arXiv:1811.05487]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    as follows   A1 A2 A3   =   1√ 21 4√ 21 2√ 21 2√ 3 − 1√ 6 1√ 6 − 2√ 7 − 1√ 14 3√ 14     A′ 1 A′ 2 A′ 3   . (21) Moreover, the neutral gauge bosonZBL becomes massive after the breaking ofU(1)B−L and the corresponding mass term ofZB−L is given by MZBL = gBL vuu√ ( 3∑ i=1 n2 φiu2 i ) , = √ 21gBLu. (22) dark matter phenom...

  4. [4]

    Here, we have denotedcij≡ cosθij andsij≡ sinθij respectively

    +s12 s13(c24 s24 +c24 s2 24), O43 = −c2 24 s13 s14−c13(c24 s24 +c24 s2 24), O44 = c14 c2 24. Here, we have denotedcij≡ cosθij andsij≡ sinθij respectively. Now, using the elements of the diagonalising matrix, the physical scalar fields can be expressed as a linear combinations of unphysical states as h =O11h′ +O21s′ 1 +O31s′ 2 +O41s′ 3, (A1) s1 =O12h′ +O22s...

  5. [5]

    As expected, the pseudo scalar mass matrix is also real symmetric

    (A4) 37 Appendix B: Diagonalisation of mass matrix of pseudo scalars The pseudo scalar mass matrix with respect to the basis state1√ 2 (A′ 1 A′ 2 A′ 3)T is given by Mps =   −2u ( uβ + √ 2δ ) u2β u ( −uβ + √ 2δ ) u2β −u 2 ( uβ + √ 2ζ ) u 2 ( uβ + 2 √ 2ζ ) u ( −uβ + √ 2δ ) u 2 ( uβ + 2 √ 2ζ ) −u 2 ( uβ + √ 2(δ + 4ζ) )   . As expected, the pseu...

  6. [6]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. 648 (2006) L109–L113, [astro-ph/0608407]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, Front. Phys.69 (1990) 1–547

    1990

  8. [8]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1807.06209

    arXiv 2018

Show all 137 references
  1. [9]

    Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv

    F. Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta6 (1933) 110–127. [Gen. Rel. Grav.41,207(2009)]. 40

    1933

  2. [10]

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, Astrophys. J. 159 (1970) 379–403

    1970

  3. [11]

    Aprile et al.,First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment, arXiv:1705.06655

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al.,First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment, arXiv:1705.06655

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Aprile et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from a One Tonne×Year Exposure of XENON1T, arXiv:1805.12562

    E. Aprile et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from a One Tonne×Year Exposure of XENON1T, arXiv:1805.12562

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    LUX Collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al.,Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017), no. 2 021303, [arXiv:1608.07648]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Tan et al.,Dark Matter Results from First 98.7 Days of Data from the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys

    PandaX-II Collaboration, A. Tan et al.,Dark Matter Results from First 98.7 Days of Data from the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016), no. 12 121303, [arXiv:1607.07400]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cui et al.,Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, arXiv:1708.06917

    PandaX-II Collaboration, X. Cui et al.,Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, arXiv:1708.06917

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. Liu, X. Chen, and X. Ji,Current status of direct dark matter detection experiments, Nature Phys. 13 (2017), no. 3 212–216, [arXiv:1709.00688]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kahlhoefer,Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches, Int

    F. Kahlhoefer,Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A32 (2017), no. 13 1730006, [arXiv:1702.02430]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    LZ Collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al.,LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Conceptual Design Report, arXiv:1509.02910

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Aprile et al.,Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment, JCAP 1604 (2016), no

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al.,Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment, JCAP 1604 (2016), no. 04 027, [arXiv:1512.07501]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Aalbers et al.,DARWIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector, JCAP 1611 (2016) 017, [arXiv:1606.07001]

    DAR WINCollaboration, J. Aalbers et al.,DARWIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector, JCAP 1611 (2016) 017, [arXiv:1606.07001]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Chialva, P

    D. Chialva, P. S. B. Dev, and A. Mazumdar,Multiple dark matter scenarios from ubiquitous stringy throats, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013), no. 6 063522, [arXiv:1211.0250]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Heeck and H

    J. Heeck and H. Zhang,Exotic Charges, Multicomponent Dark Matter and Light Sterile Neutrinos, JHEP 05 (2013) 164, [arXiv:1211.0538]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    F ermi-LA T, MAGICCollaboration, M. L. Ahnen et al.,Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT observations of dwarf satellite galaxies, JCAP 1602 (2016), no. 02 039, [arXiv:1601.06590]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    +c12 (−c13 c2 24 s14 +s13 (c24 s24 +c24 s2 24)), O42 = −c13 c2 24 s12 s14 +c12 (−c2 24 s24 +s2

  17. [25]

    Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma, J. Wudka, and C. P. Yuan,Multipartite dark matter, arXiv:0711.3881. 41

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    K. M. Zurek,Multi-Component Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 115002, [arXiv:0811.4429]

    2009 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. Esch, M. Klasen, and C. E. Yaguna,A minimal model for two-component dark matter, JHEP 09 (2014) 108, [arXiv:1406.0617]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Biswas, D

    A. Biswas, D. Majumdar, A. Sil, and P. Bhattacharjee,Two Component Dark Matter : A Possible Explanation of 130 GeVγ− Ray Line from the Galactic Centre, JCAP 1312 (2013) 049, [arXiv:1301.3668]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, and J. Wudka,Two-Component Dark Matter, JHEP 10 (2013) 158, [arXiv:1309.2986]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    L. Bian, R. Ding, and B. Zhu,Two Component Higgs-Portal Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B728 (2014) 105–113, [arXiv:1308.3851]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    L. Bian, T. Li, J. Shu, and X.-C. Wang,Two component dark matter with multi-Higgs portals, JHEP 03 (2015) 126, [arXiv:1412.5443]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Dutta Banik, M

    A. Dutta Banik, M. Pandey, D. Majumdar, and A. Biswas,Two component WIMP-FImP dark matter model with singlet fermion, scalar and pseudo scalar, Eur. Phys. J.C77 (2017), no. 10 657, [arXiv:1612.08621]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Karam and K

    A. Karam and K. Tamvakis,Dark matter and neutrino masses from a scale-invariant multi-Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015), no. 7 075010, [arXiv:1508.03031]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Karam and K

    A. Karam and K. Tamvakis,Dark Matter from a Classically Scale-InvariantSU (3)X, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 5 055004, [arXiv:1607.01001]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    DiFranzo and G

    A. DiFranzo and G. Mohlabeng,Multi-component Dark Matter through a Radiative Higgs Portal, JHEP 01 (2017) 080, [arXiv:1610.07606]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Poulose, and P. Ghosh,Multipartite Interacting Scalar Dark Matter in the light of updated LUX data, JCAP 1704 (2017), no. 04 043, [arXiv:1607.08461]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Borah and A

    D. Borah and A. Dasgupta,Left Right Symmetric Models with a Mixture of keV-TeV Dark Matter, arXiv:1710.06170

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Klasen, F

    M. Klasen, F. Lyonnet, and F. S. Queiroz,NLO+NLL collider bounds, Dirac fermion and scalar dark matter in the B?L model, Eur. Phys. J.C77 (2017), no. 5 348, [arXiv:1607.06468]. 42

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ghosh, A

    P. Ghosh, A. K. Saha, and A. Sil,Study of Electroweak Vacuum Stability from Extended Higgs Portal of Dark Matter and Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 7 075034, [arXiv:1706.04931]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ahmed, M

    A. Ahmed, M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski, and M. Iglicki,Multi-Component Dark Matter: the vector and fermion case, arXiv:1710.01853

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, T. N. Maity, and T. S. Ray,Mitigating Direct Detection Bounds in Non-minimal Higgs Portal Scalar Dark Matter Models, JHEP 10 (2017) 088, [arXiv:1706.04699]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Barman, S

    B. Barman, S. Bhattacharya, and M. Zakeri,Multipartite Dark Matter inSU (2)N extension of Standard Model and signatures at the LHC, JCAP 1809 (2018), no. 09 023, [arXiv:1806.01129]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. K. Saha, A. Sil, and J. Wudka,Dark Matter as a remnant of SQCD Inflation, JHEP 10 (2018) 124, [arXiv:1805.03621]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, and N. Sahu,Multipartite Dark Matter with Scalars, Fermions and signatures at LHC, JHEP 02 (2019) 059, [arXiv:1809.07474]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Aoki and T

    M. Aoki and T. Toma,Boosted Self-interacting Dark Matter in a Multi-component Dark Matter Model, JCAP 1810 (2018), no. 10 020, [arXiv:1806.09154]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Dutta Banik, A

    A. Dutta Banik, A. K. Saha, and A. Sil,Scalar assisted singlet doublet fermion dark matter model and electroweak vacuum stability, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 7 075013, [arXiv:1806.08080]

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bernal, D

    N. Bernal, D. Restrepo, C. Yaguna, and O. Zapata,Two-component dark matter and a 43 massless neutrino in a newB−L model, arXiv:1808.03352

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Yaser Ayazi and A

    S. Yaser Ayazi and A. Mohamadnejad,Scale-Invariant Two Component Dark Matter, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 2 140, [arXiv:1808.08706]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Poulin and S

    A. Poulin and S. Godfrey,Multi-component dark matter from a hidden gauged SU(3), arXiv:1808.04901

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Chakraborti and P

    S. Chakraborti and P. Poulose,Interplay of Scalar and Fermionic Components in a Multi-component Dark Matter Scenario, arXiv:1808.01979

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Chakraborti, A

    S. Chakraborti, A. Dutta Banik, and R. Islam,Probing Multicomponent Extension of Inert Doublet Model with a Vector Dark Matter, arXiv:1810.05595

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Profumo, K

    S. Profumo, K. Sigurdson, and L. Ubaldi,Can we discover multi-component WIMP dark matter?, JCAP 0912 (2009) 016, [arXiv:0907.4374]

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Elahi and S

    F. Elahi and S. Khatibi,Multi-Component Dark Matter in a Non-Abelian Dark Sector, arXiv:1902.04384

    1902 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, and S. K. Kang,Two-component Dark Matter with co-genesis of Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe, arXiv:1903.10516

    1903 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Borah, R

    D. Borah, R. Roshan, and A. Sil,Minimal Two-component Scalar Doublet Dark Matter with Radiative Neutrino Mass, arXiv:1904.04837

    1904 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, A. K. Saha, and A. Sil,Two component dark matter with inert Higgs doublet: neutrino mass, high scale validity and collider searches, arXiv:1905.12583

    1905 arXiv

  49. [57]

    K. P. Modak, D. Majumdar, and S. Rakshit,A Possible Explanation of Low Energyγ-ray Excess from Galactic Centre and Fermi Bubble by a Dark Matter Model with Two Real Scalars, JCAP 1503 (2015) 011, [arXiv:1312.7488]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Fukuoka, D

    H. Fukuoka, D. Suematsu, and T. Toma,Signals of dark matter in a supersymmetric two dark matter model, JCAP 1107 (2011) 001, [arXiv:1012.4007]

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Cirelli and J

    M. Cirelli and J. M. Cline,Can multistate dark matter annihilation explain the high-energy cosmic ray lepton anomalies?, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 023503, [arXiv:1005.1779]

    2010 arXiv

  52. [60]

    M. Aoki, M. Duerr, J. Kubo, and H. Takano,Multi-Component Dark Matter Systems and Their Observation Prospects, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 076015, [arXiv:1207.3318]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    M. Aoki, J. Kubo, and H. Takano,Two-loop radiative seesaw mechanism with multicomponent dark matter explaining the possible ? excess in the Higgs boson decay and at the Fermi LAT, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013), no. 11 116001, [arXiv:1302.3936]

    2013 arXiv

  54. [62]

    C.-Q. Geng, D. Huang, and C. Lai,Revisiting multicomponent dark matter with new AMS-02 data, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 9 095006, [arXiv:1411.4450]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    C.-Q. Geng, D. Huang, and L.-H. Tsai,Imprint of multicomponent dark matter on AMS-02, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 5 055021, [arXiv:1312.0366]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Gu,Multi-component dark matter with magnetic moments for Fermi-LAT gamma-ray line, Phys

    P.-H. Gu,Multi-component dark matter with magnetic moments for Fermi-LAT gamma-ray line, Phys. Dark Univ.2 (2013) 35–40, [arXiv:1301.4368]

    2013 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. Aoki, J. Kubo, and H. Takano,Multicomponent Dark Matter in Radiative Seesaw Model and Monochromatic Neutrino Flux, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014), no. 7 076011, [arXiv:1408.1853]

    2014 arXiv

  58. [66]

    C.-Q. Geng, D. Huang, and L.-H. Tsai,Cosmic Ray Excesses from Multi-component Dark 44 Matter Decays, Mod. Phys. Lett.A29 (2014), no. 37 1440003, [arXiv:1405.7759]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Herrero-Garcia, A

    J. Herrero-Garcia, A. Scaffidi, M. White, and A. G. Williams,On the direct detection of multi-component dark matter: sensitivity studies and parameter estimation, JCAP 1711 (2017), no. 11 021, [arXiv:1709.01945]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Biswas, D

    A. Biswas, D. Majumdar, and P. Roy,Nonthermal two component dark matter model for Fermi-LAT ?-ray excess and 3.55 keV X-ray line, JHEP 04 (2015) 065, [arXiv:1501.02666]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, and R. Adhikari,Common origin of the 3.55 keV x-ray line and the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess in a radiative neutrino mass model, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015), no. 7 075005, [arXiv:1503.06130]

    2015 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, and S. Patra,Common origin of3.55 keV x-ray line and gauge coupling unification with left-right dark matter, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 11 115019, [arXiv:1604.01929]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, U. K. Dey, S. Patra, and G. Tomar,Multi-component Fermionic Dark Matter and IceCube PeV scale Neutrinos in Left-Right Model with Gauge Unification, arXiv:1704.04138

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C790927 (1979) 315–321, [arXiv:1306.4669]

    1979 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Herrero-Garcia, A

    J. Herrero-Garcia, A. Scaffidi, M. White, and A. G. Williams,Time-dependent rate of multicomponent dark matter: Reproducing the DAMA/LIBRA phase-2 results, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 12 123007, [arXiv:1804.08437]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Profumo, F

    S. Profumo, F. Queiroz, and C. Siqueira,Has AMS-02 Observed Two-Component Dark Matter?, arXiv:1903.07638

    1903 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys

    S. Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 1566–1570

    1979

  68. [76]

    Minkowski,µ→eγ at a Rate of One Out of109 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγ at a Rate of One Out of109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. 67B (1977) 421–428

    1977

  69. [77]

    Wetterich,Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation, Nucl

    C. Wetterich,Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation, Nucl. Phys. B187 (1981) 343–375

    1981

  70. [78]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 912

    1980

  71. [79]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle,Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. 45 D22 (1980) 2227

    1980

  72. [80]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 165

    1981

  73. [81]

    Lazarides, Q

    G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich,Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model, Nucl. Phys. B181 (1981) 287–300

    1981

  74. [82]

    Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys

    E. Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 077301, [hep-ph/0601225]

    2006 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle,Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number, Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 774

    1982

  76. [84]

    Brahmachari and R

    B. Brahmachari and R. N. Mohapatra,Unified explanation of the solar and atmospheric neutrino puzzles in a minimal supersymmetric SO(10) model, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 015001, [hep-ph/9710371]

    1998 arXiv

  77. [85]

    R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and G. C. Joshi,Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons, Z. Phys. C44 (1989) 441

    1989

  78. [86]

    Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li, and R. Ruiz,Lepton Number Violation: Seesaw Models and Their Collider Tests, Front.in Phys.6 (2018) 40, [arXiv:1711.02180]

    2018 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Davidson,B−L as the Fourth Color, Quark-Lepton Correspondence, and Natural Masslessness of Neutrinos Within a Generalized Ws Model, Phys

    A. Davidson,B−L as the Fourth Color, Quark-Lepton Correspondence, and Natural Masslessness of Neutrinos Within a Generalized Ws Model, Phys. Rev.D20 (1979) 776

    1979

  80. [88]

    M. Aoki, D. Kaneko, and J. Kubo,Multicomponent Dark Matter in Radiative Seesaw Models, Front.in Phys.5 (2017) 53, [arXiv:1711.03765]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, and P. Tunney,Anomaly-Free Dark Matter Models are not so Simple, JHEP 08 (2017) 053, [arXiv:1704.03850]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Fileviez Perez, E

    P. Fileviez Perez, E. Golias, R.-H. Li, C. Murgui, and A. D. Plascencia,On Anomaly-Free Dark Matter Models, arXiv:1904.01017

    1904 arXiv

  83. [91]

    S. F. King,Littlest Seesaw, JHEP 02 (2016) 085, [arXiv:1512.07531]

    2016 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Buchmuller, C

    W. Buchmuller, C. Greub, and P. Minkowski,Neutrino masses, neutral vector bosons and the scale of B-L breaking, Phys. Lett. B267 (1991) 395–399

    1991

  85. [93]

    R. N. Mohapatra and R. E. Marshak,Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 1316–1319. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.44,1643(1980)]

    1980

  86. [94]

    R. E. Marshak and R. N. Mohapatra,Quark - Lepton Symmetry and B-L as the U(1) 46 Generator of the Electroweak Symmetry Group, Phys. Lett. 91B (1980) 222–224

    1980

  87. [95]

    Masiero, J

    A. Masiero, J. F. Nieves, and T. Yanagida,B−l Violating Proton Decay and Late Cosmological Baryon Production, Phys. Lett. 116B (1982) 11–15

    1982

  88. [96]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Spontaneous Breaking of GlobalB−l Symmetry and Matter - Antimatter Oscillations in Grand Unified Theories, Phys. Rev. D27 (1983) 254

    1983

  89. [97]

    B. L. Sanchez-Vega and E. R. Schmitz,Fermionic dark matter and neutrino masses in a B-L model, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 053007, [arXiv:1505.03595]

    2015 arXiv

  90. [98]

    J. C. Montero and V. Pleitez,Gauging U(1) symmetries and the number of right-handed neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B675 (2009) 64–68, [arXiv:0706.0473]

    2009 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Ma and R

    E. Ma and R. Srivastava,Dirac or inverse seesaw neutrino masses withB−L gauge symmetry andS3 flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B741 (2015) 217–222, [arXiv:1411.5042]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [100]

    E. Ma, N. Pollard, R. Srivastava, and M. Zakeri,Gauge B−L Model with ResidualZ3 Symmetry, Phys. Lett. B750 (2015) 135–138, [arXiv:1507.03943]

    2015 arXiv

  93. [101]

    B. L. Sanchez-Vega, J. C. Montero, and E. R. Schmitz,Complex Scalar DM in a B-L Model, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014), no. 5 055022, [arXiv:1404.5973]

    2014 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Patra, W

    S. Patra, W. Rodejohann, and C. E. Yaguna,A new B ? L model without right-handed neutrinos, JHEP 09 (2016) 076, [arXiv:1607.04029]

    2016 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Singirala, R

    S. Singirala, R. Mohanta, and S. Patra,Singlet scalar Dark matter inU(1)B−L models without right-handed neutrinos, arXiv:1704.01107

    arXiv

  96. [104]

    Nomura and H

    T. Nomura and H. Okada,Radiative neutrino mass in an alternativeU(1)B−L gauge symmetry, arXiv:1705.08309

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    Okada, S

    N. Okada, S. Okada, and D. Raut,A naturalZ′-portal Majorana dark matter in alternative U(1) extended Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 3 035022, [arXiv:1811.11927]

    2019 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Wang and Z.-L

    W. Wang and Z.-L. Han,Radiative linear seesaw model, dark matter, andU(1)B−L, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 095001, [arXiv:1508.00706]

    2015 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Cacciapaglia, C

    G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csaki, G. Marandella, and A. Strumia,The Minimal Set of Electroweak Precision Parameters, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 033011, [hep-ph/0604111]

    2006 arXiv

  100. [108]

    than the electroweak gauge couplings. Also, if theZ′ gauge boson couples only to the third generation of leptons, all such collider bounds become much weaker, as explored in the context of DM and collider searches in a recent work [111]. Similarly, the additional scalars in th...

    2018

  101. [109]

    Biswas and A

    A. Biswas and A. Gupta,Calculation of Momentum Distribution Function of a Non-thermal Fermionic Dark Matter, JCAP 1703 (2017), no. 03 033, [arXiv:1612.02793]. [Addendum: JCAP1705,no.05,A02(2017)]

    2017 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Nanda and D

    D. Nanda and D. Borah,Common origin of neutrino mass and dark matter from anomaly 47 cancellation requirements of aU(1)B−L model, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 11 115014, [arXiv:1709.08417]

    2017 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Biswas, D

    A. Biswas, D. Borah, and D. Nanda,When Freeze-out Precedes Freeze-in: Sub-TeV Fermion Triplet Dark Matter with Radiative Neutrino Mass, JCAP 1809 (2018), no. 09 014, [arXiv:1806.01876]

    2018 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Carena, A

    M. Carena, A. Daleo, B. A. Dobrescu, and T. M. P. Tait,Z′ gauge bosons at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 093009, [hep-ph/0408098]

    2004 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Aaboud et al.,Search for new high-mass phenomena in the dilepton final state using 36.1 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1707.02424

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for new high-mass phenomena in the dilepton final state using 36.1 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1707.02424

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    Aad et al.,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at√s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at√s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B796 (2019) 68–87, [arXiv:1903.06248]

    2019 arXiv

  107. [115]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for high-mass resonances in dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2018) 120, [arXiv:1803.06292]

    2018 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah, P. Ghosh, and A. K. Saha,Flavoured gauge extension of singlet-doublet fermionic dark matter: neutrino mass, high scale validity and collider signatures, arXiv:1907.10071

    1907 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Robens and T

    T. Robens and T. Stefaniak,Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J.C75 (2015) 104, [arXiv:1501.02234]

    2015 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Chalons, D

    G. Chalons, D. Lopez-Val, T. Robens, and T. Stefaniak,The Higgs singlet extension at LHC Run 2, PoS ICHEP2016 (2016) 1180, [arXiv:1611.03007]

    2016 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Lopez-Val and T

    D. Lopez-Val and T. Robens,?r and the W-boson mass in the singlet extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 114018, [arXiv:1406.1043]

    2014 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Khachatryan et al.,Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, JHEP 10 (2015) 144, [arXiv:1504.00936]

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, JHEP 10 (2015) 144, [arXiv:1504.00936]

    2015 arXiv

  113. [121]

    M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek,Discovering the Higgs through highly-displaced vertices, 48 Phys. Lett. B661 (2008) 263–267, [hep-ph/0605193]

    2008 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Belanger and J.-C

    G. Belanger and J.-C. Park,Assisted freeze-out, JCAP 1203 (2012) 038, [arXiv:1112.4491]

    2012 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Biswas,Explaining Low Energyγ-ray Excess from the Galactic Centre using a Two Component Dark Matter Model, J

    A. Biswas,Explaining Low Energyγ-ray Excess from the Galactic Centre using a Two Component Dark Matter Model, J. Phys. G43 (2016), no. 5 055201, [arXiv:1412.1663]

    2016 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B360 (1991) 145–179

    1991

  117. [125]

    Belanger, F

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov,micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates, Comput. Phys. Commun.192 (2015) 322–329, [arXiv:1407.6129]

    2015 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Alloul, N

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks,FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2250–2300, [arXiv:1310.1921]

    2014 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Belyaev, N

    A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov,CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 1729–1769, [arXiv:1207.6082]

    2013 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and S. D. McDermott,Simplified Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 11 115022, [arXiv:1404.0022]

    2014 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Rolbiecki and K

    K. Rolbiecki and K. Sakurai,Long-lived bino and wino in supersymmetry with heavy scalars and higgsinos, JHEP 11 (2015) 091, [arXiv:1506.08799]

    2015 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Kadota and A

    K. Kadota and A. Spray,Electroweak Multiplet Dark Matter at Future Lepton Colliders, JHEP 02 (2019) 017, [arXiv:1811.00560]

    2019 arXiv

  123. [131]

    S. Jana, N. Okada and D. Raut,Displaced Vertex and Disappearing Track Signatures in type-III Seesaw, [arXiv:1911.09037]

    1911 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Cirelli, N

    M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia,Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B753 (2006) 178–194, [hep-ph/0512090]

    2006 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Ma and D

    E. Ma and D. Suematsu,Fermion Triplet Dark Matter and Radiative Neutrino Mass, Mod. Phys. Lett. A24 (2009) 583–589, [arXiv:0809.0942]

    2009 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Aaboud et al.,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2018) 022, [arXiv:1712.02118]

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2018) 022, [arXiv:1712.02118]

    2018 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Accomando, D

    E. Accomando, D. Becciolini, A. Belyaev, S. Moretti and C. Shepherd-Themistocleous,Z′ at the LHC: Interference and Finite Width Effects in Drell-Yan, JHEP 10 (2013) 153, 49 [arXiv:1304.6700]

    2013 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Accomando, F

    E. Accomando, F. Coradeschi, T. Cridge, J. Fiaschi, F. Hautmann, S. Moretti, C. Shepherd-Themistocleous and C. Voisey,Production of Z’-Boson Resonances with Large Width at the LHC, [arXiv:1910.13759]

    1910 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Curtin et al.,Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case, arXiv:1806.07396

    D. Curtin et al.,Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case, arXiv:1806.07396. 50

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.