Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

de Sitter Vacua from Ten Dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ten-dimensional type IIB supergravity, with D7-brane gaugino condensation and anti-D3-branes included, forces the four-dimensional Einstein-frame curvature to exactly the value computed in the four-dimensional effective theory of the KKLT…

desk verdict A technically strong 10D derivation of the KKLT AdS potential, but the advertised de Sitter match rests on an unproven off-shell assumption that the authors concede in §5. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04788 v3 pith:5E6TPS6X submitted 2019-08-13 hep-th

Shamit Kachru , Manki Kim , Liam McAllister , Max Zimet This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 83E5081T30 PACS 04.65.+e11.25.-w
keywords typeIIBsupergravitydeSittervacuagauginocondensationD7-branesanti-D3-branesKKLTconstructiongeneralizedcomplexgeometryten-dimensionalstress-energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the ten-dimensional equations of type IIB supergravity, not just the four-dimensional effective action, describe the de Sitter vacuum of the KKLT construction. From the fermionic couplings of the D7-brane action, it derives the ten-dimensional stress-energy produced by gaugino condensation, adds the stress-energy of anti-D3-branes, and finds that the integrated Einstein equations require the four-dimensional Einstein-frame scalar curvature to take exactly the value given by the four-dimensional F-term potential of KKLT. The significance is that a non-supersymmetric vacuum can be described by a concrete ten-dimensional field configuration, so intrinsically ten-dimensional questions, such as consistency constraints from integrating over the compact space, become answerable in the same language. If the derivation holds, the four-dimensional potential of KKLT is not an isolated effective-theory result but a consequence of the ten-dimensional equations of motion.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the master equation (2.22), obtained from the traced ten-dimensional Einstein equations combined with the integrated five-form Bianchi identity; it converts the four-dimensional curvature problem into integrals of ten-dimensional stress-energy. The gaugino-condensate stress-energy $T^{\langle\lambda\lambda\rangle}_{\mu\nu} = T^{\lambda\lambda}_{\mu\nu} + T^{\lambda\lambda\lambda\lambda}_{\mu\nu}$ carries the argument: the two-gaugino part comes from the coupling $S_{G\lambda\lambda} \sim \int \sqrt{-g_4}\, g_6\, e^{\varphi/2-2u}\, G^{[2]}\cdot\Omega\, \bar\lambda\bar\lambda\, \delta(0)$, with $G^{[2]} = G_3 + i\, d_2 t$, and the four-gaugino part from $S_{\lambda\lambda\lambda\lambda} \sim -\int \sqrt{-g_4}\, g_6\, e^{-4A+8u}\, \nu\, \Omega\cdot\Omega\, |\lambda\lambda|^2 \delta(0)$. Assigning the four-dimensional value of the gaugino bilinear $\langle\lambda\lambda\rangle$ is the only four-dimensional input. The corrected Killing spinor equations (A.93)--(A.95), fixed by consistency with the Bianchi identities and the vanishing D3-brane gaugino mass, yield $\langle W_{\mathrm{GCG}}\rangle = W$, which turns the flux-side computation into the full F-term potential. Singular contributions to (2.22) cancel among the gaugino stress-energy, the flux kinetic term, and the internal curvature, leaving the finite potential (3.34).

What would settle it

Compute $\langle W_{\mathrm{GCG}}\rangle - W$ at a point where the Kähler modulus is displaced from its supersymmetric minimum, using (A.100) in an explicit Calabi-Yau orientifold compactification with flux and a D7-brane stack; a nonzero value of $(2\alpha-\beta-\xi)\,\mathrm{Re}\,T\, \partial_T W_{\mathrm{np}}/\pi$ would make the ten-dimensional curvature (2.22) deviate from the four-dimensional F-term potential. Alternatively, repeat the derivation with the earlier Killing spinor equations that take $\beta=0$: the authors themselves show those equations fail the Bianchi-consistency and vanishing-gaugino-mass conditions, so the exact match cannot survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the master equation (2.22) equating the four-dimensional Einstein-frame Ricci scalar to integrated ten-dimensional stress-energy becomes exactly the four-dimensional Einstein equation with the F-term potential (3.34) once the gaugino-condensate stress-energy (3.33) and the anti-D3-brane stress-energy (4.1) are inserted. The gaugino stress-energy is built from a two-gaugino coupling to generalized flux $G^{[2]} = G_3 + i\, d_2 t$ and a four-gaugino term; using the Killing spinor equations of the generalized complex geometry, the paper proves that on a supersymmetric configuration the generalized complex geometry superpotential equals the full superpotential, $\langle W_{\mathrm{GCG}}\rangle = W_{\mathrm{flux}} + W_{\mathrm{np}}$. In the presence of anti-D3-branes, interactions mediated by Kaluza-Klein excitations of the warped throat are suppressed by powers of the warp factor, so only the breathing-mode interaction of the original four-dimensional analysis survives. The ten-dimensional equations then require $M_{\mathrm{pl}}^2 R_4[g]$ to equal the four-dimensional value both in the supersymmetric AdS vacuum and, provided the off-shell extension of the superpotential equality holds, throughout the potential for the Kähler modulus.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the equality $\langle W_{\mathrm{GCG}}\rangle = W$ between the generalized-complex-geometry superpotential and the full four-dimensional superpotential continues to hold away from the supersymmetric minimum; the paper states that this off-shell extension is plausible but not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The KKLT scalar potential can be regarded as a property of a ten-dimensional field configuration, so constraints obtained by integrating the ten-dimensional equations over the compact space are consistent with the four-dimensional effective theory by construction.
  • The corrected Killing spinor equations (A.93)--(A.95), which include a term proportional to $\langle\lambda\lambda\rangle$ absent from earlier versions, are uniquely selected by Bianchi compatibility and vanishing D3-brane gaugino mass; any ten-dimensional treatment of gaugino condensation should use them.
  • Interactions between anti-D3-branes and the D7-brane gaugino condensate mediated by Kaluza-Klein modes of the throat are suppressed by powers of the warp factor, so the breathing mode is the only non-negligible coupling channel, matching the original KKLT analysis.
  • The ten-dimensional computation reproduces not only the vacuum curvature but the full F-term potential for the Kähler modulus away from the supersymmetric minimum, provided the off-shell equality of superpotentials holds.
  • The singular localized-source contributions to the curvature equation cancel exactly, with the finite remainder equal to the scalar potential (3.34), so localized D7-brane sources do not invalidate the master equation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A concrete next check would be to evaluate $\langle W_{\mathrm{GCG}}\rangle - W$ at a displaced Kähler modulus in an explicit orientifold compactification; the paper's formula (A.100) reduces this to computing the coefficient $(2\alpha-\beta-\xi)\,\mathrm{Re}\,T\, \partial_T W_{\mathrm{np}}/\pi$ off-shell.
  • The same stress-energy method should extend to Euclidean D3-instanton contributions to $W_{\mathrm{np}}$, since instantons and gaugino condensation enter the same nonperturbative superpotential; a testable prediction is that their ten-dimensional stress-energy obeys the same master equation.
  • The corrected Killing spinor equations may revise earlier ten-dimensional treatments of gaugino condensation in other compactifications, because the previous equations fail the Bianchi-consistency and gaugino-mass conditions identified here.
  • If the off-shell equality is confirmed, the master equation (2.22) becomes a direct ten-dimensional diagnostic for de Sitter stability: any proposed new source can be inserted into the right-hand side and checked against the required four-dimensional curvature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper aims to derive the four-dimensional scalar potential of the KKLT de Sitter construction directly from ten-dimensional type IIB supergravity. Starting from the D7-brane gaugino action, the authors compute the two- and four-gaugino couplings, assign the four-dimensional gaugino bilinear vev (3.7), and derive the ten-dimensional stress-energy sourced by gaugino condensation. They then use their master equation (2.22), together with the stress-energy of anti-D3-branes, to compute the four-dimensional Einstein-frame curvature and claim exact agreement with the four-dimensional KKLT potential, both in the supersymmetric AdS vacuum and in the non-supersymmetric de Sitter vacuum. The AdS result is derived in detail, including a cancellation of singular contributions in Appendix C; the de Sitter result, however, is conditional on an off-shell extension of the superpotential relation (3.22)/(A.101), which the authors state they have not proved.

Significance. If the central claim were fully established, this would be a significant result: it would provide a ten-dimensional derivation of the KKLT scalar potential, including the gaugino-condensate stress-energy and its coupling to anti-D3-branes, and would resolve an important open question about the existence of a ten-dimensional description of de Sitter vacua. The paper contains substantial technical work, including a careful derivation of the D7-brane gaugino couplings, the corrected Killing spinor equations (A.93)-(A.95), and a detailed cancellation of singular divergences in Appendix C. The on-shell AdS match is a concrete and nontrivial result. However, the de Sitter part of the claim is not yet established, because it depends on an explicitly unproven off-shell equality; the paper itself concedes this in Section 5. The significance of the paper would be high if that gap were closed, but as it stands the strongest claim is conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [§A.3.4, §4.2, §5; Eqs. (A.100), (A.101), (3.22)] The de Sitter result is load-bearing on an unproven off-shell extension of the superpotential identity. The derivation of (A.101), i.e. ⟨W_GCG⟩ = W, fixes the coefficients α=1, β=2, ξ=0 using supersymmetric consistency conditions: the Bianchi-compatible fluxes (A.82)-(A.85) and the vanishing of the D3-brane gaugino mass (A.88)-(A.89) in a supersymmetric vacuum. The §4 computation, however, evaluates the gaugino-flux coupling at shifted field values φ_bg + δφ|D3, cf. Eqs. (4.3)-(4.4), where the Killing spinor equations do not hold. Equation (A.100) shows that if 2α−β−ξ ≠ 0 away from the supersymmetric minimum, then ⟨W_GCG⟩ ≠ W, and the term K_T W in (A.108) would be replaced by K_T W_flux, so the ten-dimensional potential would not equal (3.34). Section 5 concedes this explicitly: 'provided that (3.22) continues to hold off-shell, which we find plausible but have not established here.' This gap directly affects the central claim that the ten-dimensional equations of motion reproduce the KKLT de Sitter curvature exactly.
  2. [§1, §3.1, §A.3.5; Eqs. (3.7), (A.101)] The claim that four-dimensional information enters only through the gaugino bilinear vev (3.7) requires qualification. The on-shell relation (A.101) is derived from ten-dimensional Killing spinor equations, but only under supersymmetric conditions; its off-shell use in the de Sitter computation is an additional assumption imported from the four-dimensional effective theory. As written, the derivation of (3.34) in §3.3 uses (A.101) to translate G[2]·Ω into K_T W, and the same translation is used at shifted field values in §4. The paper is honest about this, but it means the ten-dimensional computation does not independently predict the full KKLT potential away from the supersymmetric minimum. A concrete test would be to verify (A.101) off-shell in a simplified setting, or to identify which terms in the Killing spinor equations fail and how the correction scales.
  3. [§4.2, Appendix B; Eqs. (4.9), (B.30), (B.31)] The proof that the interaction stress-energy T^int_μν in (4.7) is negligible is essential for the dS match, but part of the evidence is not available in the published literature. In particular, the spurion analysis that establishes the completeness of the leading corrections to the anti-D3-brane potential is cited to reference [66], which is listed as 'to appear' and is used for the results summarized in (B.22)-(B.31). Since the suppression of T^int_μν is one of the two directions needed for (4.9), the exactness of the final match should either be established without dependence on [66] or the relevant calculations should be included in this paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, §1] The abstract and introduction state 'exact agreement' with the four-dimensional effective theory, but the body of the paper explicitly conditions the de Sitter part of the result on the unproven off-shell relation (3.22). The abstract should be qualified to reflect this caveat.
  2. [§3.2.1, Eq. (3.18)] The notation 'G[2] · Ω' is used without defining the contraction convention before Eq. (3.20); the definition is only given later in Appendix A. A brief definition at first use would improve readability.
  3. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.3)-(4.7)] The decomposition of the stress-energy into 'background plus δφ|⟨λλ⟩ plus δφ|D3' is schematic, and the nonlinear corrections are said to be negligible; it would be helpful to state explicitly the parametric expansion parameter (e.g., ratios of warp factors or of ⟨λλ⟩ to the KK scale) that controls this expansion.
  4. [References] Reference [66] is cited as 'to appear' but is used as a primary source for the spurion analysis in Appendix B; this should be updated to a published reference or the needed results should be reproduced in the paper.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

dS/off-shell match reduces to the assumed off-shell identity ⟨W_GCG⟩=W; the supersymmetric AdS part remains an independent derivation.

  1. self definitional [Section 5 (Conclusions), extending Eq. (A.101) off-shell; used in §3.3 and §4.2.]
    "Furthermore, provided that (3.22) continues to hold off-shell — which we find plausible but have not established here — we recovered the complete scalar potential of the four-dimensional theory, even away from the supersymmetric minimum of the potential for the Kähler modulus."

    The off-shell part of the central claim is obtained by assuming (3.22) holds away from the supersymmetric minimum, i.e. ⟨W_GCG⟩ = W. All subsequent 10D stress-energy terms are then rewritten in terms of the same W and K that define the 4D F-term potential (3.12): the gaugino-flux piece becomes K^{T\bar T}∂_T W K_T W (A.108) and the four-gaugino piece becomes K^{T\bar T}∂_T W ∂_{\bar T}\bar W (A.112). Substituting into the master equation (2.22) returns exactly (3.34). Thus the dS curvature match is not an independent 10D result; it is the content of the assumed off-shell identity. The paper concedes this at (A.108), noting that if one had only W_flux, K_T W would become K_T W_flux and the match would fail.

full rationale

The supersymmetric AdS half of the paper is not circular: the modified Killing spinor equations (A.93)-(A.95) are derived from independent consistency conditions (Bianchi compatibility and vanishing D3-brane gaugino mass), and the on-shell identity ⟨W_GCG⟩ = W follows rather than being imposed. The gaugino bilinear vev (3.7) is an external four-dimensional input, but the paper states this explicitly and uses it as a single physical parameter, not as a fit to the final curvature. The remaining self-citations (e.g. [22], [45], [59]) concern auxiliary computations of throat interactions and D3-brane potentials that have independent published derivations; they are not the structural source of the claimed match. However, the non-supersymmetric, off-shell (and hence dS) part of the central claim reduces to the unproven assumption that (3.22) continues to hold away from the supersymmetric minimum. The paper flags this limitation explicitly in Section 5: 'provided that (3.22) continues to hold off-shell, which we find plausible but have not established here.' Since the off-shell equality is exactly the bridge that converts 10D generalized-complex-geometry flux data into the 4D superpotential W, and since the derived 4D potential (3.34) is built from that same W and K, the dS agreement follows by construction once the assumption is granted. The authors' transparency about the gap prevents this from being a hidden circularity, but it does make the strongest dS claim conditional rather than a self-contained ten-dimensional prediction. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the supersymmetric vacuum part is independent, while the off-shell/dS part is structurally loaded by the assumed identity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two external inputs from the four-dimensional theory: the gaugino bilinear vev (3.7) and, for the de Sitter case, the unproven off-shell equality of superpotentials. The background theory (10D supergravity, the D7-brane action, the KKLT ingredients) is taken as standard. No new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The D7-brane gaugino bilinear vev <lambda lambda> takes the value determined by the four-dimensional super-Yang-Mills theory (Eq 3.7), namely <lambda lambda> = -32 pi^2 / N_c * exp(kappa_4^2 K / 2) * W_np.
    This is the only injection of four-dimensional data into the ten-dimensional computation, stated in Section 1 and used throughout Section 3. The 10D stress-energy is computed from this external input.
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized complex geometry superpotential equals the full superpotential in off-shell configurations: <W_GCG> = W off-shell (assumed extension of Eq A.101).
    Explicitly not proven; Section 5: 'provided that (3.22) continues to hold off-shell, which we find plausible but have not established here'. This is load-bearing for the de Sitter (off-shell, non-supersymmetric) part of the claim.
  • domain assumption The metric/compactification ansatz (2.1) with a single Kaehler modulus T and O3/O7 orientifold of a Calabi-Yau threefold M.
    The entire reduction assumes this ansatz; deviations (multiple moduli, warping corrections) are not analyzed.
  • domain assumption The anti-D3-brane/gaugino condensate interactions mediated by KK excitations of the Klebanov-Strassler throat are negligible; only the breathing mode couples them.
    Established in Appendix B via spectroscopy of T^{1,1} and spurion analysis, but relies on the hierarchy of scales and neglects possible nonlinear effects. Explicitly used to justify Eq (4.9).
  • standard math Standard type IIB supergravity action (2.2) and the D7-brane gaugino action derived from type I by T-duality (Appendix A).
    Background theory taken as given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of de Sitter Vacua from Ten Dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5E6TPS6X

@misc{pith2026190804788,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: de Sitter Vacua from Ten Dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5E6TPS6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04788}
}
read the original abstract

We analyze the de Sitter construction of \cite{KKLT} using ten-dimensional supergravity, finding exact agreement with the four-dimensional effective theory. Starting from the fermionic couplings in the D7-brane action, we derive the ten-dimensional stress-energy due to gaugino condensation on D7-branes. We demonstrate that upon including this stress-energy, as well as that due to anti-D3-branes, the ten-dimensional equations of motion require the four-dimensional curvature to take precisely the value determined by the four-dimensional effective theory of \cite{KKLT}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quadratic Axion Couplings in String Theory

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quadratic axion–gauge couplings θ²F² arise ubiquitously in string theory from classical, perturbative, and non-perturbative sources, with benchmark sizes often exceeding the QCD axion’s loop-induced coupling.

  2. O(16)$\times$O(16) heterotic theory on $AdS_3\times S^3\times T^4$

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The one-loop correction to the O(16)×O(16) heterotic vacuum on AdS3×S3×T4 raises the cosmological constant but never uplifts it to de Sitter for any flux integers, and the Kaluza-Klein modes of the six-dimensional fie...

  3. Deep observations of the Type IIB flux landscape

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An enumeration algorithm for Type IIB flux vacua yields millions of explicit vacua in a two-modulus Calabi-Yau, exposing deviations from statistical predictions and a vacuum with |W0| about 5.5 x 10^-5.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [2]

    Silverstein, TASI / PiTP / ISS lectures on moduli and microphysics , in Progress in string theory

    E. Silverstein, TASI / PiTP / ISS lectures on moduli and microphysics , in Progress in string theory. Proceedings, Summer School, TASI 2003, Boul der, USA, June 2-27, 2003, pp. 381–415, 2004. hep-th/0405068. 53

    arXiv 2003

  2. [66]

    Gandhi, L

    S. Gandhi, L. McAllister and S. Sjors, to appear

  3. [1]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory , Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 046005 , [ hep-th/0301240]

    arXiv 2003

  4. [3]

    Grana, Flux compactifications in string theory: A comprehensive re view, Phys

    M. Grana, Flux compactifications in string theory: A comprehensive re view, Phys. Rept. 423 (2006) 91–158 , [ hep-th/0509003]

    arXiv 2006

  5. [4]

    M. R. Douglas and S. Kachru, Flux Compactification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 733–796, [ hep-th/0610102]

    arXiv 2007

  6. [5]

    Blumenhagen, B

    R. Blumenhagen, B. Kors, D. Lust and S. Stieberger, Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes , Phys. Rept. 445 (2007) 1–193 , [ hep-th/0610327]

    arXiv 2007

  7. [6]

    Denef, M

    F. Denef, M. R. Douglas and S. Kachru, Physics of String Flux Compactifications , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 119–144, [ hep-th/0701050]

    arXiv 2007

  8. [7]

    McAllister and E

    L. McAllister and E. Silverstein, String Cosmology: A Review , Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 565–605 , [ 0710.2951]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 88 references
  1. [8]

    Denef, Les Houches Lectures on Constructing String Vacua , Les Houches 87 (2008) 483–610, [ 0803.1194]

    F. Denef, Les Houches Lectures on Constructing String Vacua , Les Houches 87 (2008) 483–610, [ 0803.1194]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Inflation and String Theory . Cambridge University Press, 2014

    2014

  3. [10]

    Quevedo, Local String Models and Moduli Stabilisation , Mod

    F. Quevedo, Local String Models and Moduli Stabilisation , Mod. Phys. Lett. A30 (2015) 1530004 , [ 1404.5151]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [11]

    De Wit, D

    B. De Wit, D. J. Smit and N. D. Hari Dass, Residual supersymmetry of compactified d = 10 supergravity , Nuclear Physics B 283 (1987) 165–191

    1987

  5. [12]

    S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru and J. Polchinski, Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 106006 , [ hep-th/0105097]

    2002 arXiv

  6. [13]

    P. J. Steinhardt and D. Wesley, Dark Energy, Inflation and Extra Dimensions , Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 104026 , [ 0811.1614]

    2009 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Moritz, A

    J. Moritz, A. Retolaza and A. Westphal, Toward de Sitter space from ten dimensions , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 046010 , [ 1707.08678]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Hamada, A

    Y. Hamada, A. Hebecker, G. Shiu and P. Soler, Brane gaugino condensate in 10d , 1812.06097

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    F. F. Gautason, V. Van Hemelryck and T. Van Riet, The Tension between 10D Supergravity and dS Uplifts , Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800091 , [ 1810.08518]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Carta, J

    F. Carta, J. Moritz and A. Westphal, Gaugino condensation and small uplifts in KKLT, 1902.01412

    1902 arXiv

  11. [18]

    F. F. Gautason, V. Van Hemelryck, T. Van Riet and G. Venke n, A 10d view on the KKLT AdS vacuum and uplifting , 1902.01415

    1902 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Hamada, A

    Y. Hamada, A. Hebecker, G. Shiu and P. Soler, Understanding KKLT from a 10d perspective, 1902.01410

    1902 arXiv

  13. [20]

    I. Bena, M. Grana, N. Kovensky and A. Retolaza, K¨ ahler moduli stabilization from ten dimensions, 1908.01785

    1908 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Koerber and L

    P. Koerber and L. Martucci, From ten to four and back again: How to generalize the geometry, JHEP 08 (2007) 059 , [ 0707.1038]

    2007 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, S. Kachru, I. R. Klebanov and L. McAllister, D3-brane Potentials from Fluxes in AdS/CFT , JHEP 06 (2010) 072 , [ 1001.5028]

    2010 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Dymarsky and L

    A. Dymarsky and L. Martucci, D-brane non-perturbative effects and geometric deformations, JHEP 04 (2011) 061 , [ 1012.4018]. 54

    2011 arXiv

  17. [24]

    P. G. Camara, L. E. Ibanez and A. M. Uranga, Flux-induced SUSY-breaking soft terms on D7-D3 brane systems , Nucl. Phys. B708 (2005) 268–316 , [ hep-th/0408036]

    2005 arXiv

  18. [25]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Maharana, Dynamics of warped compactifications and the shape of the warped landscape , Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 126003 , [ hep-th/0507158]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Denef and M

    F. Denef and M. R. Douglas, Distributions of flux vacua , JHEP 05 (2004) 72, [hep-th/0404116]

    2004 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Bousso and J

    R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, Quantization of Four-form Fluxes and Dynamical Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant , JHEP 06 (2000) 006, [ hep-th/0004134]

    2000 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Denef, M

    F. Denef, M. R. Douglas, B. Florea, A. Grassi and S. Kachr u, Fixing All Moduli in a Simple F-Theory Compactification , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9 (2005) 861–929, [hep-th/0503124]

    2005 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Gukov, C

    S. Gukov, C. Vafa and E. Witten, CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds , Nucl. Phys. B584 (2000) 69–108 , [ hep-th/9906070]

    2000 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Terning, Modern supersymmetry: Dynamics and duality

    J. Terning, Modern supersymmetry: Dynamics and duality . Oxford: Clarendon, 2006

    2006

  24. [31]

    Kallosh, Gaugino Condensation and Geometry of the Perfect Square , Phys

    R. Kallosh, Gaugino Condensation and Geometry of the Perfect Square , Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 066003 , [ 1901.02023]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Kaplunovsky and J

    V. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis, Field dependent gauge couplings in locally supersymmetric effective quantum field theories , Nucl. Phys. B422 (1994) 57–124 , [hep-th/9402005]

    1994 arXiv

  26. [33]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and B. Kors, Loop corrections to volume moduli and inflation in string theory, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 026005 , [ hep-th/0404087]

    2005 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, I. R. Klebanov, J. M. Maldacena , L. P. McAllister and A. Murugan, On D3-brane Potentials in Compactifications with Fluxes and W rapped D-branes, JHEP 11 (2006) 031 , [ hep-th/0607050]

    2006 arXiv

  28. [35]

    DeWolfe and S

    O. DeWolfe and S. B. Giddings, Scales and hierarchies in warped compactifications and brane worlds , Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 066008 , [ hep-th/0208123]

    2003 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Kallosh, L

    R. Kallosh, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. Van Proeyen, Superconformal symmetry, supergravity and cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 4269–4338 , [hep-th/0006179]

    2000 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Grana, R

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello, Generalized structures of N=1 vacua, JHEP 11 (2005) 020 , [ hep-th/0505212]

    2005 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Benmachiche and T

    I. Benmachiche and T. W. Grimm, Generalized N=1 orientifold compactifications and the Hitchin functionals , Nucl. Phys. B748 (2006) 200–252 , [ hep-th/0602241]

    2006 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Koerber, Lectures on Generalized Complex Geometry for Physicists , Fortsch

    P. Koerber, Lectures on Generalized Complex Geometry for Physicists , Fortsch. Phys. 59 (2011) 169–242 , [ 1006.1536]

    2011 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Heidenreich, L

    B. Heidenreich, L. McAllister and G. Torroba, Dynamic SU(2) Structure from Seven-branes, JHEP 05 (2011) 110 , [ 1011.3510]

    2011 arXiv

  34. [41]

    D. Lust, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and D. Tsimpis, Generalized non-supersymmetric flux vacua , JHEP 11 (2008) 021 , [ 0807.4540]

    2008 arXiv

  35. [42]

    McAllister, de Sitter Vacua from Ten Dimensions , talk presented at String Phenomenology 2019, June 2019

    L. McAllister, de Sitter Vacua from Ten Dimensions , talk presented at String Phenomenology 2019, June 2019

    2019

  36. [43]

    Grana, J

    M. Grana, J. Louis and D. Waldram, Hitchin functionals in N=2 supergravity , JHEP 01 (2006) 008 , [ hep-th/0505264]. 55

    2006 arXiv

  37. [44]

    A. Micu, E. Palti and G. Tasinato, Towards Minkowski Vacua in Type II String Compactifications, JHEP 03 (2007) 104 , [ hep-th/0701173]

    2007 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, J. M. Maldacena, L. P. McAllister and S. P. Trivedi, Towards inflation in string theory , JCAP 0310 (2003) 013 , [ hep-th/0308055]

    2003 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Gandhi, L

    S. Gandhi, L. McAllister and S. Sjors, A Toolkit for Perturbing Flux Compactifications, JHEP 12 (2011) 053 , [ 1106.0002]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Kachru, J

    S. Kachru, J. Pearson and H. L. Verlinde, Brane / flux annihilation and the string dual of a nonsupersymmetric field theory , JHEP 06 (2002) 021 , [ hep-th/0112197]

    2002 arXiv

  41. [48]

    DeWolfe, S

    O. DeWolfe, S. Kachru and M. Mulligan, A Gravity Dual of Metastable Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 065011 , [ 0801.1520]

    2008 arXiv

  42. [49]

    McGuirk, G

    P. McGuirk, G. Shiu and Y. Sumitomo, Non-supersymmetric infrared perturbations to the warped deformed conifold , Nucl. Phys. B842 (2011) 383–413 , [ 0910.4581]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [50]

    I. Bena, M. Grana and N. Halmagyi, On the Existence of Meta-stable Vacua in Klebanov-Strassler, JHEP 09 (2010) 087 , [ 0912.3519]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [51]

    I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Grana and N. Halmagyi, On The Inflaton Potential From Antibranes in Warped Throats , JHEP 07 (2012) 140 , [ 1011.2626]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [52]

    I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Grana, N. Halmagyi and S. Massai, On Metastable Vacua and the Warped Deformed Conifold: Analytic Results , Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 015003 , [ 1102.2403]

    2013 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Dymarsky, On gravity dual of a metastable vacuum in Klebanov-Strassle r theory , JHEP 05 (2011) 053 , [ 1102.1734]

    A. Dymarsky, On gravity dual of a metastable vacuum in Klebanov-Strassle r theory , JHEP 05 (2011) 053 , [ 1102.1734]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [54]

    I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Grana, N. Halmagyi and S. Massai, The backreaction of anti-D3 branes on the Klebanov-Strassler geometry , JHEP 06 (2013) 060 , [ 1106.6165]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Cohen-Maldonado, J

    D. Cohen-Maldonado, J. Diaz, T. van Riet and B. Vercnock e, Observations on fluxes near anti-branes, JHEP 01 (2016) 126 , [ 1507.01022]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Aalsma, M

    L. Aalsma, M. Tournoy, J. P. Van Der Schaar and B. Vercnoc ke, Supersymmetric embedding of antibrane polarization , Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 086019 , [ 1807.03303]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Armas, N

    J. Armas, N. Nguyen, V. Niarchos, N. A. Obers and T. Van Ri et, Metastable Nonextremal Antibranes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 181601 , [ 1812.01067]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [58]

    DeWolfe, L

    O. DeWolfe, L. McAllister, G. Shiu and B. Underwood, D3-brane Vacua in Stabilized Compactifications, JHEP 09 (2007) 121 , [ hep-th/0703088]

    2007 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, S. Kachru, I. R. Klebanov and L. McAllister, Holographic Systematics of D-brane Inflation , JHEP 03 (2009) 093 , [ 0808.2811]

    2009 arXiv

  53. [60]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. Murugan, Gauge/Gravity Duality and Warped Resolved Conifold, JHEP 03 (2007) 042 , [ hep-th/0701064]

    2007 arXiv

  54. [61]

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity, Nucl. Phys. B536 (1998) 199–218 , [ hep-th/9807080]

    1998 arXiv

  55. [62]

    S. S. Gubser, Einstein manifolds and conformal field theories , Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 025006 , [ hep-th/9807164]

    1999 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Ceresole, G

    A. Ceresole, G. Dall’Agata and R. D’Auria, K K spectroscopy of type IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x T**11 , JHEP 11 (1999) 009 , [ hep-th/9907216]

    1999 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Ceresole, G

    A. Ceresole, G. Dall’Agata, R. D’Auria and S. Ferrara, Spectrum of type IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x T**11: Predictions on N=1 SCFT’s , 56 Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 066001 , [ hep-th/9905226]

    2000 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Aharony, Y

    O. Aharony, Y. E. Antebi and M. Berkooz, Open string moduli in KKLT compactifications, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 106009 , [ hep-th/0508080]

    2005 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kachru, L

    S. Kachru, L. McAllister and R. Sundrum, Sequestering in String Theory , JHEP 10 (2007) 013 , [ hep-th/0703105]

    2007 arXiv

  60. [68]

    M. Berg, D. Marsh, L. McAllister and E. Pajer, Sequestering in String Compactifications, JHEP 06 (2011) 134 , [ 1012.1858]

    2011 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Dymarsky and S

    A. Dymarsky and S. Massai, Uplifting the baryonic branch: a test for backreacting anti-D3-branes, JHEP 11 (2014) 034 , [ 1310.0015]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    McAllister, P

    L. McAllister, P. Schwaller, G. Servant, J. Stout and A. Westphal, Runaway Relaxion Monodromy, JHEP 02 (2018) 124 , [ 1610.05320]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond . Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

  64. [72]

    Koerber, Stable D-branes, calibrations and generalized Calabi-Yau g eometry, JHEP 08 (2005) 099 , [ hep-th/0506154]

    P. Koerber, Stable D-branes, calibrations and generalized Calabi-Yau g eometry, JHEP 08 (2005) 099 , [ hep-th/0506154]

    2005 arXiv

  65. [73]

    M. Dine, R. Rohm, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Gluino Condensation in Superstring Models, Phys. Lett. 156B (1985) 55–60

    1985

  66. [74]

    Bergshoeff, M

    E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, B. de Wit and P. van Nieuwenhuizen , Ten-Dimensional Maxwell-Einstein Supergravity, its Currents, and the Issue o f its Auxiliary Fields , Nucl. Phys. B195 (1982) 97

    1982

  67. [75]

    Bershadsky, V

    M. Bershadsky, V. Sadov and C. Vafa, D-Branes and Topological Field Theories , Nucl. Phys. B463 (1996) 420–434, [ hep-th/9511222]

    1996 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Van Proeyen, Tools for supersymmetry , Ann

    A. Van Proeyen, Tools for supersymmetry , Ann. U. Craiova Phys. 9 (1999) 1–48, [hep-th/9910030]

    1999 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Bergshoeff, R

    E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest and A. Van Pro eyen, New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls , Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 3359–3382 , [ hep-th/0103233]

    2001 arXiv

  70. [78]

    J. Held, D. Lust, F. Marchesano and L. Martucci, DWSB in heterotic flux compactifications, JHEP 06 (2010) 090 , [ 1004.0867]

    2010 arXiv

  71. [79]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and B. Kors, On the moduli dependence of nonperturbative superpotentials in brane inflation , hep-th/0409282

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    Kachru, D

    S. Kachru, D. Simic and S. P. Trivedi, Stable Non-Supersymmetric Throats in String Theory, JHEP 05 (2010) 067 , [ 0905.2970]

    2010 arXiv

  73. [81]

    I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities , JHEP 08 (2000) 052 , [hep-th/0007191]

    2000 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Kim and L

    M. Kim and L. McAllister, Monodromy Charge in D7-brane Inflation , 1812.03532

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Krause and E

    A. Krause and E. Pajer, Chasing brane inflation in string-theory , JCAP 0807 (2008) 023 , [ 0705.4682]

    2008 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, I. R. Klebanov and L. McAlliste r, Towards an Explicit Model of D-brane Inflation , JCAP 0801 (2008) 024 , [ 0706.0360]

    2008 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Martucci, Warping the K¨ ahler potential of F-theory/IIB flux compactific ations, 57 JHEP 03 (2015) 067 , [ 1411.2623]

    L. Martucci, Warping the K¨ ahler potential of F-theory/IIB flux compactific ations, 57 JHEP 03 (2015) 067 , [ 1411.2623]

    2015 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Cownden, A

    B. Cownden, A. R. Frey, M. C. D. Marsh and B. Underwood, Dimensional Reduction for D3-brane Moduli , JHEP 12 (2016) 139 , [ 1609.05904]

    2016 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Martucci, Warped K¨ ahler potentials and fluxes, JHEP 01 (2017) 056 , [ 1610.02403]

    L. Martucci, Warped K¨ ahler potentials and fluxes, JHEP 01 (2017) 056 , [ 1610.02403]

    2017 arXiv

  80. [88]

    C. P. Burgess, J. M. Cline, K. Dasgupta and H. Firouzjahi , Uplifting and Inflation with D3 Branes , JHEP 03 (2007) 027 , [ hep-th/0610320]. 58

    2007 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.