An Introduction to Stellarators: From magnetic fields to symmetries and optimization

Adelle M. Wright; Elizabeth J. Paul; Lise-Marie Imbert-Gerard

An Introduction to Stellarators: From magnetic fields to symmetries and optimization

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that stellarator design can be traced in one self-contained chain from Maxwell's equations and Hamiltonian mechanics to coil optimization.

desk verdict A solid, well-organized tutorial review of stellarator theory that delivers on its stated pedagogical goal; no new science, but real and useful for mathematicians entering the field. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05360 v2 pith:GD2FSJI2 submitted 2019-08-14 physics.plasm-ph

Lise-Marie Imbert-Gerard , Elizabeth J. Paul , Adelle M. Wright This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.55.Hc

keywords stellaratormagneticconfinementfusionmagnetohydrodynamicsfluxsurfacesquasisymmetryBoozercoordinatesrotationaltransformcoiloptimization

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to make stellarator design comprehensible to non-plasma physicists by tracing a single chain of reasoning from Maxwell's equations and Hamiltonian mechanics all the way to coil optimization. The authors' claim is that the practical difficulty of stellarators, and the cure through 'hidden symmetries' such as quasisymmetry and omnigeneity, can be understood from the same mathematical objects: flux surfaces, rotational transform, Boozer coordinates, and the Hamiltonian structure of field-line flow. If the tutorial works, a mathematically trained reader should be able to see why nested flux surfaces are not guaranteed in three dimensions, why current is not the only way to generate rotational transform, and why design therefore becomes an optimization problem. The payoff claimed is an accessible entry point into the stellarator research literature, not a new experimental discovery.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is the Hamiltonian description of magnetic field lines: with the poloidal flux as the Hamiltonian and the toroidal flux as the conjugate momentum, field lines become orbits of a dynamical system, so axisymmetry is a conserved quantity, magnetic coordinates straighten field lines, and Boozer coordinates reduce the field to $B = I(\psi)\nabla\vartheta + G(\psi)\nabla\phi + K(\psi,\vartheta,\phi)\nabla\psi$, where the field strength carries the symmetry information. In this language, quasisymmetry is the condition that $B$ depends on only one angle, omnigeneity is a weaker condition on particle trapping, and the rotational transform $\iota = d\Psi_P/d\Psi_T$ emerges as the rotation number of field lines. A second workhorse is the near-axis expansion, which shows how torsion and axis ellipticity generate rotational transform without plasma current and supplies low-order design targets. The optimization chapters then treat coil design as a regularized inverse problem, choosing coil shapes that reproduce a target equilibrium.

What would settle it

Compute an ideal-MHD equilibrium with a pressure gradient that does not vanish on a rational surface with $\iota = n/m$ and a nonzero Fourier component $(\sqrt{g}\,\nabla\cdot J_\perp)_{m,n}$; the paper's equation (211) then has no smooth solution, so any numerically smooth equilibrium would show the model is being violated, and a time-dependent calculation should instead develop an island or current sheet.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that all of stellarator modeling and design can be presented as one coherent theory. Magnetic confinement requires field lines that stay on nested toroidal surfaces; in an axisymmetric tokamak such surfaces are guaranteed by a conserved toroidal canonical momentum, but in a stellarator the absence of symmetry makes field-line flow a non-autonomous Hamiltonian system whose invariant tori can break, producing islands and chaos. The paper then shows that rotational transform can still be produced without plasma current through the torsion and rotating ellipticity of the magnetic axis, that ideal magnetohydrodynamics imposes integral constraints on rational surfaces and can give rise to current sheets, and that the design goals of quasisymmetry, omnigeneity, and related properties can be formulated in Boozer coordinates and pursued numerically. The closing claim is that fixed-boundary equilibrium, near-axis construction, and coil optimization form a single tractable design pipeline.

Load-bearing premise

The entire design story assumes that ideal magnetohydrodynamics with continuously nested flux surfaces adequately describes a real finite-pressure stellarator plasma; the paper itself flags in Section 10.3 that this model develops singular currents or current sheets at rational surfaces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A stellarator can confine plasma without a large net current: the near-axis expansion shows that rotational transform arises from axis torsion and rotating ellipticity, so the coils must be shaped to create those geometric properties.
Quasisymmetric or omnigenous fields restore tokamak-like trapped-particle confinement, so design targets can be phrased as symmetry conditions on the field strength rather than as ad hoc heuristics.
The existence of flux surfaces is not all-or-nothing: small deviations from integrability leave a positive-measure set of surfaces when the rotational transform is sufficiently irrational and the shear is nonzero.
Coil design is intrinsically ill-posed and must be regularized or reformulated through winding surfaces or filament methods, making coil complexity an explicit part of stellarator design.
Finite pressure at rational surfaces forces a choice: either flatten the pressure there or construct special geometry, because the ideal-MHD parallel current becomes singular at $\iota = n/m$ unless an integral constraint is satisfied.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A quantitative test of the near-axis design rule would be to take a vacuum field with a prescribed axis torsion and ellipticity profile and compare the numerically computed rotational transform with the expansion-derived formula; a mismatch would show where the expansion ceases to be useful for design.
The Hamiltonian framing suggests a direct analogy with symplectic maps: stellarator design could be reformulated as prescribing the field-line map's generating function, which may expose which symmetry properties are achievable beyond the near-axis regime.
If the singular-current constraint is generic, then every smooth high-beta equilibrium with nested surfaces must either flatten pressure at rational surfaces or be specially constructed; one could scan random boundary perturbations of a fixed device and measure how often the constraint fails.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a well-executed tutorial review, not a research contribution. It does exactly what it says: it gives a mathematically coherent path from Maxwell's equations and Lagrangian mechanics through guiding-center motion, MHD equilibrium, magnetic coordinates, quasisymmetry, and coil optimization, pitched at readers with PDE and variational-calculus background but no plasma physics. There is no new result and no circularity problem, because the paper makes no predictive claims and re-presents established material. The standard derivations I checked are accurate, and the authors consistently flag where ideal MHD is being idealized.

The strongest part is the explicit derivation of the gyroaveraged Lagrangian in Section 5.2 and the careful Fourier/method-of-characteristics treatment of the Boozer coordinate equation in Section 9.3. That is more detail than most existing reviews provide, and it is genuinely useful for mathematicians who want to see where the formulas come from. The paper is also honest about the 1/x and delta-function current singularities at rational surfaces in 3D MHD, and it does not pretend that the symmetry-based design methods escape those limitations. The discussion of ideal MHD's limits, islands, and resistive extensions is present in the text itself, not hidden.

The soft spots are minor for a tutorial but worth naming. The claim to be "self-contained" is slightly generous: Section 7.6.2 states the Mercier near-axis result and defers the mechanism to Section 10.5, but Section 10.5 appears to summarize the near-axis expansion rather than fully derive it. A reader who wants to actually see that mechanism must go to the cited literature. That is acceptable for this kind of document, but the authors should soften the claim or add the omitted steps. There are also occasional typos and small presentation slips, none of them load-bearing.

Who is this for: mathematics graduate students, applied mathematicians, and computational scientists entering stellarator research. Plasma physicists will find the early sections basic but may still want the later sections as a reference map. The paper deserves serious peer review. I would accept it as a tutorial/review with minor revisions: adjust the self-containment wording, add pointers to fuller near-axis derivations, and clean up the typos before final publication.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a pedagogical review of stellarator physics, developing the subject from Maxwell's equations, classical mechanics, single-particle motion, and guiding-center theory, through ideal MHD equilibria, magnetic and Boozer coordinates, Hamiltonian field-line dynamics, singular currents, near-axis equilibria, hidden symmetries, and numerical optimization. Its central claim, stated in the Preface, is that it is a self-contained document presenting the theoretical building blocks for understanding stellarator modeling, the associated challenges, and optimization for stellarator design, aimed at readers with a mathematics background but no prior plasma physics. The exposition is largely derivational rather than survey-style, with explicit assumptions and frequent pointers to the primary literature.

Significance. If the manuscript's pedagogical claim is judged by what a tutorial can reasonably deliver, it is successful and valuable: it bridges the terminology gap between plasma physics and applied mathematics, writes out many standard derivations, and flags the main limitations of the models it presents. The discussions of singular currents on rational surfaces, KAM persistence of flux surfaces, and the ill-posedness of coil optimization are unusually explicit for an introductory text and will help newcomers understand why stellarator design is mathematically rich. The stress-test concern that Sections 12-13 rely on idealized equilibrium models is largely mitigated because Sections 10.3-10.4 themselves document the breakdown of nested flux surfaces and describe non-ideal extensions; the tutorial does not hide these limitations. No circularity burden arises, since the paper introduces no new predictions or fitted parameters.

minor comments (6)

[8.1] The cross-reference stating 'In Section 6.4 we will discuss the result that ideal MHD does not allow for changes in topology' points to the wrong section; the flux-freezing and topology discussion appears in Section 8.2 and should be cited there.
[7.6.2 and 10.5] The Mercier near-axis computation, which underpins the claim that rotational transform can be produced by torsion and ellipticity, is summarized rather than fully derived; since the Preface promises derivations 'when it is not too involved', the text should include an explicit statement that the near-axis expansion is only sketched and refer the reader to the original Mercier references for the complete derivation.
[10.3.1] The sentence 'Therefore, the 1/x Pﬁrsch-Schlüter term is not a physical singularity, as it would imply an infinite amount of current' is confusing; the intended meaning appears to be that the 1/x term is unphysical because it produces an infinite current, and the wording should be adjusted accordingly.
[10.3.3] There is a typo in 'the jump in the margnetic field' and a grammatical error in 'Choosing the value of ~ψk(0) will may also lead'; these should be corrected.
[10.4.1] The sentence beginning 'It has been proposed [199] in that a small pressure gradient...' contains an extra 'in' and should be rewritten for clarity.
[4] The text contains an encoding artifact, 'NewtonâĂŹs approach', near the beginning of Section 4; this should be fixed in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an expository tutorial whose derivations are built from standard first principles, with no fitted input relabeled as a prediction and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's stated goal is pedagogical: to present 'the basic theoretical building blocks to understand modeling of stellarator magnetic fields, some of the challenges associated with modeling, and optimization for designing stellarators.' Nothing in the text claims to derive a new empirical prediction from fitted parameters. The derivation chain runs from Maxwell's equations and classical mechanics through ideal MHD, flux coordinates, Hamiltonian field-line flow, and near-axis expansion; these are presented as textbook material with explicit derivations where feasible. The near-axis Mercier result is introduced in Section 7.6.2 as 'A classic result of Mercier [167, 95]' and deferred to Section 10.5, but deferring a proof to the literature is not circularity, and the tutorial does not rest its central claim on asserting its own conclusion. The paper explicitly flags the limitations of the ideal-MHD assumptions in Section 10.3, including 1/x and delta-function singularities on rational surfaces, and in Section 10.4 moves beyond ideal MHD. This acknowledgment prevents any hidden reliance on idealized models from being smuggle. No self-citation is used to justify a forbidden uniqueness claim or to define a quantity in terms of the quantity being derived. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard physics models and mathematical results; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The main domain assumptions are the validity of ideal MHD and the guiding center approximation, plus the existence of nested flux surfaces for the coordinate systems and symmetry concepts.

assumptions (8)

standard math Maxwell's equations (Eqs. 4-7) govern the electromagnetic fields.
Invoked throughout Section 3 as the starting point for all field models.
domain assumption The ideal MHD model (Eqs. 104-108) is a valid description of fusion plasmas for the design concepts discussed.
Assumed in Sections 8 and 11 for equilibrium calculations; the paper notes its limitations in Section 10.4.
domain assumption The guiding center approximation with small gyroradius (Eq. 50) is valid for fusion conditions.
Used in Section 5.2 to derive drifts and adiabatic invariants; justified by the scale separation in Table 1.
standard math Magnetic field line flow can be represented as a Hamiltonian system (Eqs. 173-174).
Foundational for the existence-of-surfaces discussion in Section 10.1.
standard math KAM theory (Diophantine condition, Eq. 201) applies to magnetic field line flows.
Used in Section 10.2.4 to argue persistence of some flux surfaces in 3D.
domain assumption Mercier's near-axis asymptotic expansion (Section 10.5, Eq. 267) correctly describes rotational transform generation by axis torsion and ellipticity.
Invoked in Section 7.6.2 to explain current-free rotational transform; the full calculation is only summarized.
domain assumption The concept of quasisymmetry provides confinement properties comparable to axisymmetry (Section 12.1).
Underlies the optimization objectives in Section 13.
domain assumption Boozer coordinates require the existence of nested flux surfaces and vanishing radial current (Section 9.3).
Used in Sections 9 and 12 to infer symmetry properties.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Introduction to Stellarators: From magnetic fields to symmetries and optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GD2FSJI2

@misc{pith2026190805360,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Introduction to Stellarators: From magnetic fields to symmetries and optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GD2FSJI2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05360}
}

read the original abstract

In this self-contained document, we aim to present the basic theoretical building blocks to understand modeling of stellarator magnetic fields, some of the challenges associated with modeling, and optimization for designing stellarators. As often as possible, the ideas will be presented using equations and pictures, and references to other relevant introductory material will be included. This document is accessible to those who may not have a physics background but are interested in applications of mathematical and computational tools to stellarator research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05360 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** The motion in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field is described by the orthonor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** In a straight, uniform magnetic field, charged particles exhibit fast helical motion about [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (41 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A solenoid is use to produce an (approximately) straight, uniform magnetic field. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: We illustrate a particle orbit in a magnetic field pointing into the page with a gradient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: In a toroidal vacuum magnetic field, the magnitude of the toroidal field varies as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: A purely toroidal field (a) cannot provide confinement due to the guiding center drifts. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The standard cylindrical coordinate system: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Comparison of orthogonal (left) and non-orthogonal (right) flux coordinate systems [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: To produce this Figure, field lines are followed, and each time they hit a plane at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: The position in a toroidal system is often described by two angles. A poloidal angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: The toroidal flux, ΨT (ψ), is the magnetic flux through a surface at constant φ bounded by the surface labeled by ψ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: The poloidal flux, ΨP (ψ), is the magnetic flux through a ribbon-like surface (pink) at constant θ bounded by the surface labeled by ψ (orange) and the magnetic axis (black). 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: We consider a flux coordinate system consisting of tori with circular cross-sections. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Poloidal angle θ and level curves of the flux label ψ in a poloidal half plane. In the poloidal plane, the magnetic axis is the point enclosed by all the flux surfaces. 33 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_15.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: The poloidal magnetic field of a tokamak is produced by toroidal plasma current, which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_16.png]

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: A stellarator confines hot plasma with magnetic fields that do not exhibit a continuous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_17.png]

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: Two examples of field lines on a toroidal surface. An [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_18.png]

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: The magnetic axis of the TJ-II stellarator (black) is displayed with the orthonormal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_19.png]

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: A flux tube is shown (blue) on which field lines lie (black). The magnetic flux through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_20.png]

**Figure 22.** Figure 22: The integration curve at ϕ = const. and ψ = const. (black) encloses the surface ST (ψ) (green) through which the toroidal current is integrated. 9.2 Covariant form The magnetic field can also be written in the basis of the gradients of the magnetic coordinates (ψ,ϑ,ϕ)…

**Figure 23.** Figure 23: The integration curve at ϑ = const. and ψ = const. (black) encloses the surface SP (ψ) (green) through which the poloidal current is integrated. torus. The requirement that IP be a flux function comes from integration of (132) with respect to ϕ, noting that Bϑ must be…

**Figure 24.** Figure 24: Poincaré surfaces of section are shown for the model magnetic field ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_24.png]

**Figure 25.** Figure 25: The reference (δ = 0) and perturbed (δ > 0) domains in the (y, x)-plane are shown. The black and red lines correspond to x = ±a and x±a(y), respectively. R x 0 By(x 0 , y) dx0 and hence write the components of the magnetic field B = Bxxˆ + Byyˆ + Bzzˆ as Bx = − ∂ ∂y Z…

**Figure 26.** Figure 26: Illustrating the solutions of (231) in the (y, x) plane for ψe(0) = 0 (a) and ψe(0) = B0/ cosh(ka) (c), with B0 = 1, a = 1, k = 1 and δ = 0.1. The stream plots of the corresponding magnetic field in the (y, x) plane are shown in (b) and (d), respectively. If a time-de…

**Figure 27.** Figure 27: We consider a surface of constant ψ near the magnetic axis, r0(l) (a). The cross-section of such a surface in the plane spanned by eˆ1(l) and eˆ2(l) is shown in (b). A point in this plane is given in the (ρ, ϑ, l) coordinate system by (249). Near the axis, the magneti…

**Figure 28.** Figure 28: A force-free equilibrium can be computed in an annular region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_28.png]

**Figure 29.** Figure 29: (a) The last magnetic surface of NCSX is shown with the colorscale indicating field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_29.png]

**Figure 30.** Figure 30: (a) The last magnetic surface of HSX is shown with the colorscale indicating field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_30.png]

**Figure 31.** Figure 31: The last closed magnetic surface of the W7-X configuration is shown with the color [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_31.png]

**Figure 32.** Figure 32: Stellarator symmetry describes an inversion about the line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_32.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: The so-called ‘mono-energetic’ diffusion coefficient (see [63] for details) versus collisionality, ν∗ = νR/ιv, where ν is the mono-energetic pitch-angle-scattering frequency, R the major radius and v the speed of the particles, in the standard configuration of W7-X (b…

**Figure 34.** Figure 34: A schematic of the ARIES-CS stellarator power plant concept. The modular coils lie [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p106_34.png]

**Figure 35.** Figure 35: The surface, S, used for evaluating the integral form of Ampere’s law (393). This integral involves a line integral along C, the intersection of S with Scoil. S is the union of six faces that can be defined as,    {r(−∆b, θ, e ζe); [PIT…

**Figure 36.** Figure 36: (a) The outer boundary of the NCSX LI383 equilibrium [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_36.png]

**Figure 37.** Figure 37: A cross-section of a modular coil of the NCSX stellarator, displaying the conducing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p115_37.png]

**Figure 38.** Figure 38: A diagram of the Princeton Model A stellarator based on Lyman Spitzer’s figure-eight [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p116_38.png]

**Figure 39.** Figure 39: A schematic diagram of the Wendelstein-I (WI) experiment, which adopted the racetrack [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p117_39.png]

**Figure 40.** Figure 40: The coil system of the Wendelstein 7-A stellarator, a classical stellarator whose con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p117_40.png]

**Figure 41.** Figure 41: The modular field coils, planar toroidal field coils, and flux surface of the Wendelstein [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p118_41.png]

**Figure 42.** Figure 42: Modular field coils (silver), toroidal field coils (bronze), and magnetic surfaces of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p119_42.png]

**Figure 43.** Figure 43: The plasma (pink) and coils of the Large Helical Device (LHD). Figure reproduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_43.png]

**Figure 44.** Figure 44: A schematic diagram of the Helically Symmetric Experiment (HSX). Figure reproduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p121_44.png]

**Figure 45.** Figure 45: The NCSX modular coils obtained through integrated coil-plasma optimization. Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p122_45.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Reactor-scale stellarators with force and torque minimized dipole coils
physics.plasm-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Jointly optimizing movable planar dipole arrays with force and torque penalties produces reactor-scale stellarator coil sets with tolerable loads and simple TF coils.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

264 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

https://hiddensymmetries.princeton.edu/meetings/simons-hour-talks
[2]

https://lasers.llnl.gov/about/how-nif-works

How NIF works. https://lasers.llnl.gov/about/how-nif-works. Accessed: 2019-08-14

2019
[3]

date accessed: 01/03/2019

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory - Timeline. date accessed: 01/03/2019

2019
[4]

Accessed: 2019-08-14

What will ITER do? https://www.iter.org/sci/Goals. Accessed: 2019-08-14

2019
[5]

https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_ 2146333/component/file_2146332/content#page=197, 2012

IPP Summer University for Plasma Physics. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_ 2146333/component/file_2146332/content#page=197, 2012. Accessed: 2020-06-15

2012
[6]

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/four

The Hamiltonian formalism. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/four. pdf, 2015. Accessed: 2018-03-05

2015
[7]

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/two.pdf,

The Lagrangian formalism. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/two.pdf,
[8]

https://www.ipp.mpg.de/2523775/ konzeptentwicklung, 2018

Magnetic Coils and Plasma from Wendelstein 7-X. https://www.ipp.mpg.de/2523775/ konzeptentwicklung, 2018. Accessed: 2018-10-04

work page arXiv 2018

Show all 264 references

[9]

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/14869/tokamak, 2018

Tokamak. http://www.ipp.mpg.de/14869/tokamak, 2018. Accessed: 2018-10-04

2018
[10]

A. F. Almagri, D. T. Anderson, F. S. B. Anderson, P. H. Probert, J. L. Shohet, and J. N. Talmadge , A Helically Symmetric Stellarator (HSX), IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 27 (1999), pp. 114–115

1999
[11]

Anderson

D. Anderson. Personal communication, 9 2019

2019
[12]

F. S. B. Anderson, A. F. Almagri, D. T. Anderson, P. G. Matthews, J. N. Tal- madge, and J. L. Shohet , The Helically Symmetric Experiment (HSX): goals, design and status, Fusion Technology, 27 (1995), pp. 273–277

1995
[13]

Angelo, E

R. Angelo, E. Duzzioni, and A. Ribeiro , Integrability in time-dependent systems with one degree of freedom, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 45 (2012), p. 055101. 126

2012
[14]

V. I. Arnold , Proof of a theorem of AN Kolmogorov on the invariance of quasi-periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian, Collected Works: Representations of Functions, Celestial Mechanics and KAM Theory, 1957–1965, (2009), pp. 267–294

2009
[15]

H. F. Arnoldus , Conservation of charge at an interface, Optics Communications, 265 (2006), pp. 52–59

2006
[16]

Bader, M

A. Bader, M. Drevlak, D. T. Anderson, B. J. F aber, C. C. Hegna, K. M. Likin, J. C. Schmitt, and J. N. Talmadge , Stellarator equilibria with reactor relevant energetic particle losses, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85 (2019), p. 905850508

2019
[17]

Bauer, The Beta Equilibrium, Stability, and Transport Codes: Applications of the Design of Stellarators, Elsevier, 1987

F. Bauer, The Beta Equilibrium, Stability, and Transport Codes: Applications of the Design of Stellarators, Elsevier, 1987

1987
[18]

Beidler, G

C. Beidler, G. Grieger, F. Herrnegger, E. Harmeyer, J. Kisslinger, W. Lotz, H. Maassberg, P. Merkel, J. Nührenberg, F. Rau, et al. , Physics and engineering design for Wendelstein VII-X, Fusion Technology, 17 (1990), pp. 148–168

1990
[19]

M. A. Berger , Introduction to magnetic helicity, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 41 (1999), p. B167

1999
[20]

M. A. Berger and G. B. Field , The topological properties of magnetic helicity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 147 (1984), pp. 133–148

1984
[21]

Berkl et al

E. Berkl et al. , Plasma physics and controlled nuclear fusion research, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Novosibirsk, vol. 1, 1968

1968
[22]

A. S. Bishop , Project Sherwood - the US program in controlled fusion, 1958

1958
[23]

A. H. Boozer, Evaluation of the structure of ergodic ﬁelds, The Physics of Fluids, 26 (1983), pp. 1288–1291

1983
[24]

, Transport and isomorphic equilibria, The Physics of Fluids, 26 (1983), p. 496

1983
[25]

, Quasi-helical symmetry in stellarators, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 37 (1995), p. A103

1995
[26]

, Non-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁelds and toroidal plasma conﬁnement, Nuclear Fusion, 55 (2015), p. 025001

2015
[27]

, Stellarators as a fast path to fusion energy, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06289, (2019)

2019 arXiv
[28]

Bosch, R

H.-S. Bosch, R. Brakel, T. Braeuer, V. Bykov, P. v an Eeten, J.-H. Feist, F. Fül- lenbach, M. Gasparotto, H. Grote, T. Klinger, et al. , Final integration, commis- sioning and start of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator operation, Nuclear Fusion, 57 (2017), p. 116015

2017
[29]

Bouquet and A

S. Bouquet and A. Bourdier , Notion of integrability for time-dependent Hamiltonian systems: illustrations from the relativistic motion of a charged particle, Physical Review E, 57 (1998), p. 1273

1998
[30]

S. Boyd, S. P. Boyd, and L. V andenberghe , Convex Optimization, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2004

2004
[31]

Brakel, M

R. Brakel, M. Anton, J. Baldzuhn, R. Burhenn, V. Erckmann, S. Fiedler, J. Geiger, H. Hartfuss, O. Heinrich, M. Hirsch, et al. , Conﬁnement in W7-AS and the role of radial electric ﬁeld and magnetic shear, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fu- sion, 39 (1997), p. B273

1997
[32]

Brenner and T

P. Brenner and T. Sunn Pedersen , Pure electron plasmas conﬁned for 90 ms in a stel- larator without electron sources or internal objects, Physics of Plasmas, 19 (2012), p. 050701

2012
[33]

R. P. Brent , Algorithms for minimization without derivatives, Courier Corporation, 2013

2013
[34]

Brooks and W

A. Brooks and W. Reiersen , Coil tolerance impact on plasma surface quality for NCSX, in 20th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering, IEEE, 2003, pp. 553–556. 127

2003
[35]

Brown, J

T. Brown, J. Breslau, D. Gates, N. Pomphrey, and A. Zolf aghari , Engineering optimization of stellarator coils lead to improvements in device maintenance, in IEEE 26th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE), Austin, Texas, 2015

2015
[36]

O. P. Bruno and P. Laurence , Existence of three-dimensional toroidal MHD equilibria with nonconstant pressure, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 49 (1996), pp. 717–764

1996
[37]

J. W. Burby, N. Kallinikos, and R. S. MacKay , Some mathematics for quasi- symmetry, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06468, (2019)

2019 arXiv
[38]

Canik, D

J. Canik, D. Anderson, F. Anderson, C. Clark, K. Likin, J. Talmadge, and K. Zhai, Reduced particle and heat transport with quasisymmetry in the Helically Symmetric Experiment, Physics of Plasmas, 14 (2007), p. 056107

2007
[39]

J. R. Cary and J. D. Hanson , Simple method for calculating island widths, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, 3 (1991), p. 1006

1991
[40]

J. R. Cary and R. G. Littlejohn , Noncanonical Hamiltonian mechanics and its appli- cation to magnetic ﬁeld line ﬂow, Annals of Physics, 151 (1983), pp. 1–34

1983
[41]

J. R. Cary and S. G. Shasharina , Helical plasma conﬁnement devices with good conﬁne- ment properties, Physical Review Letters, 78 (1997), p. 674

1997
[42]

3323–3333

, Omnigenity and quasihelicity in helical plasma conﬁnement systems, Physics of Plas- mas, 4 (1997), pp. 3323–3333

1997
[43]

Castejón, A

F. Castejón, A. Gómez-Iglesias, M. Vega-Rodríguez, J. Jiménez, J. Velasco, and J. Romero , Stellarator optimization under several criteria using metaheuristics, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 55 (2012), p. 014003

2012
[44]

Catania and P

D. Catania and P. Secchi , Global existence for two regularized mhd models in three space- dimension, Portugaliae Mathematica, 68 (2011), p. 41

2011
[45]

Colton and R

D. Colton and R. Kress , Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2013

2013
[46]

Cooper, J

W. Cooper, J. Gra ves, T. Tran, R. Gruber, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Narushima, S. Okamura, S. Sakakibara, C. Suzuki, K. W atanabe, et al. , Stability properties of anisotropic pressure stellarator plasmas with ﬂuid and noninteractive energetic particles, Fusion Science and Technology,...

2006
[47]

Czarny and G

O. Czarny and G. Huysmans , Bézier surfaces and ﬁnite elements for MHD simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 227 (2008), pp. 7423 – 7445

2008
[48]

del Castillo-Negrete, J

D. del Castillo-Negrete, J. Greene, and P. Morrison , Area preserving nontwist maps: periodic orbits and transition to chaos, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 91 (1996), pp. 1–23

1996
[49]

Dew ar, A

R. Dew ar, A. Bhattacharjee, R. Kulsrud, and A. Wright , Plasmoid solutions of the hahm–kulsrud–taylor equilibrium model, Physics of Plasmas, 20 (2013), p. 082103

2013
[50]

Dew ar and S

R. Dew ar and S. Hudson , Stellarator symmetry, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 112 (1998), pp. 275–280

1998
[51]

R. L. Dew ar, Z. Yoshida, A. Bhattacharjee, and S. R. Hudson , Variational formu- lation of relaxed and multi-region relaxed magnetohydrodynamics, Journal of Plasma Physics, 81 (2015)

2015
[52]

W. D. D’haeseleer, W. N. Hitchon, J. D. Callen, and J. L. Shohet , Flux Coor- dinates and Magnetic Field Structure: A Guide to a Fundamental Tool of Plasma Theory, Springer, 1991

1991
[53]

C. T. Dodson, P. E. Parker, and P. Parker , A user’s guide to algebraic topology, vol. 387, Springer Science & Business Media, 1997. 128

1997
[54]

Dommaschk, Representations for vacuum potentials in stellarators, Computer Physics Communications, 40 (1986), pp

W. Dommaschk, Representations for vacuum potentials in stellarators, Computer Physics Communications, 40 (1986), pp. 203–218

1986
[55]

Drevlak , Automated optimization of stellarator coils, Fusion Technology, 33 (1998), pp

M. Drevlak , Automated optimization of stellarator coils, Fusion Technology, 33 (1998), pp. 106–117

1998
[56]

Drevlak, Thermal load on the W7-X vessel from NBI losses, in 36th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, European Physical Society, 2009

M. Drevlak, Thermal load on the W7-X vessel from NBI losses, in 36th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, European Physical Society, 2009

2009
[57]

Drevlak, C

M. Drevlak, C. Beidler, J. Geiger, P. Helander, and Y. Turkin , Optimisation of stellarator equilibria with ROSE, Nuclear Fusion, 59 (2018), p. 016010

2018
[58]

Drevlak, F

M. Drevlak, F. Brochard, P. Helander, J. Kisslinger, M. Mikhailov, C. Nührenberg, J. Nührenberg, and Y. Turkin , ESTELL: A quasi-toroidally sym- metric stellarator, Contributions to Plasma Physics, 53 (2013), pp. 459–468

2013
[59]

Drevlak, J

M. Drevlak, J. Geiger, P. Helander, and Y. Turkin , Fast particle conﬁnement with optimized coil currents in the W7-X stellarator, Nuclear Fusion, 54 (2014), p. 073002

2014
[60]

L. E. Dudek, J. H. Chrzanowski, P. J. Heitzenroeder, S. Raftopoulos, M. E. Viola, G. H. Neilson, D. Rej, M. J. Cole, P. Goranson, and K. Freudenberg , Status of the NCSX construction, Fusion Engineering and Design, 84 (2009), pp. 351–354

2009
[61]

Elsasser, Magnetic ﬁeld line ﬂow as a Hamiltonian problem, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion, 28 (1986), p

K. Elsasser, Magnetic ﬁeld line ﬂow as a Hamiltonian problem, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion, 28 (1986), p. 1743

1986
[62]

Erckmann and U

V. Erckmann and U. Gasparino , Electron cyclotron resonance heating and current drive in toroidal fusion plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 36 (1994), p. 1869

1994
[63]

T. L. Ferrell , Hamilton-Jacobi perturbation theory, American Journal of Physics, 39 (1971), pp. 622–627

1971
[64]

for the ATF Team PB , The Advanced Toroidal Facility (ATF), Fusion Technology, 8 (1985), pp

T. for the ATF Team PB , The Advanced Toroidal Facility (ATF), Fusion Technology, 8 (1985), pp. 450–455

1985
[65]

Freidberg, Ideal MHD, Cambridge University Press, 2014

J. Freidberg, Ideal MHD, Cambridge University Press, 2014

2014
[66]

J. P. Freidberg , Plasma Physics and Fusion Energy, Cambridge University Press, 2008

2008
[67]

H. P. Furth, J. Killeen, and M. N. Rosenbluth , Finite-resistivity instabilities of a sheet pinch, The Physics of Fluids, 6 (1963), pp. 459–484

1963
[68]

Garabedian, Three-dimensional stellarator codes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99 (2002), pp

P. Garabedian, Three-dimensional stellarator codes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99 (2002), pp. 10257–10259

2002
[69]

P. R. Garabedian , A method of canonical coordinates for ﬂow computations, Communica- tions on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 23 (1970), pp. 313–327

1970
[70]

13716–13719

, Three-dimensional analysis of tokamaks and stellarators, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (2008), pp. 13716–13719

2008
[71]

Garren and A

D. Garren and A. H. Boozer , Existence of quasihelically symmetric stellarators, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, 3 (1991), pp. 2822–2834

1991
[72]

Gates, A

D. Gates, A. Boozer, T. Brown, J. Breslau, D. Curreli, M. Landreman, S. Laz- erson, J. Lore, H. Mynick, G. Neilson, et al. , Recent advances in stellarator opti- mization, Nuclear Fusion, 57 (2017), p. 126064

2017
[73]

Geiger, T

B. Geiger, T. Wegner, C. Beidler, R. Burhenn, B. Buttenschön, R. Dux, A. Lan- genberg, N. Pablant, T. Pütterich, Y. Turkin, et al. , Observation of anomalous impurity transport during low-density experiments in W7-X with laser blow-oﬀ injections of iron, Nuclear Fusion, 59 (20...

2019
[74]

Geiger, C

J. Geiger, C. Beidler, M. Drevlak, H. Maassberg, C. Nührenberg, Y. Suzuki, and Y. Turkin , Eﬀects of net currents on the magnetic conﬁguration of W7-X, Contribu- tions to Plasma Physics, 50 (2010), p. 770. 129

2010
[75]

S. P. Gerhardt, J. N. Talmadge, J. M. Canik, and D. T. Anderson , Measurements and modeling of plasma ﬂow damping in the Helically Symmetric eXperiment, Physics of Plasmas, 12 (2005), p. 056116

2005
[76]

Goedbloed and S

J. Goedbloed and S. Poedts , Principles of Magnetohydrodynamics: with Applications to Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas, Cambridge University Press, 2004

2004
[77]

Goldstein, C

H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko , Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, 2002

2002
[78]

R. J. Goldston and P. H. Rutherford , Introduction to Plasma Physics, CRC Press, 1995

1995
[79]

Grad, Toroidal containment of a plasma, The Physics of Fluids, 10 (1967), pp

H. Grad, Toroidal containment of a plasma, The Physics of Fluids, 10 (1967), pp. 137–154

1967
[80]

J. M. Greene , A brief review of magnetic wells, Comments on Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion, 17 (1997), pp. 389–402

1997
[81]

Grieger, C

G. Grieger, C. Beidler, and E. Harmeyer , Physics studies for helical-axis advanced stellarators, in Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, vol. 2, 1988

1988
[82]

Grieger, W

G. Grieger, W. Lotz, P. Merkel, J. Nührenberg, J. Sapper, E. Strumberger, H. Wobig, R. Burhenn, V. Erckmann, U. Gasparino, et al. , Physics optimization of stellarators, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, 4 (1992), pp. 2081–2091

1992
[83]

Hadamard , Le probleme de Cauchy et les équations aux dérivées partielles linéaires hyperboliques, vol

J. Hadamard , Le probleme de Cauchy et les équations aux dérivées partielles linéaires hyperboliques, vol. 220, 1932

1932
[84]

Hahm and R

T. Hahm and R. Kulsrud , Forced magnetic reconnection, The Physics of Fluids, 28 (1985), pp. 2412–2418

1985
[85]

L. S. Hall and B. McNamara , Three-dimensional equilibrium of the anisotropic, ﬁnite- pressure guiding-center plasma: Theory of the magnetic plasma, The Physics of Fluids, 18 (1975), pp. 552–565

1975
[86]

S. M. Hamberger, B. D. Blackwell, L. E. Sharp, and D. Shenton , H-1 design and construction, Fusion Technology, 17 (1990), pp. 123–130

1990
[87]

Hammond, C

K. Hammond, C. Zhu, T. Brown, K. Corrigan, D. Gates, and M. Sibilia , Geometric concepts for stellarator permanent magnet arrays, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00091, (2020)

2020 arXiv
[88]

P. C. Hansen, Rank-deﬁcient and Discrete Ill-posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion, vol. 4, SIAM, 2005

2005
[89]

Harafuji, T

K. Harafuji, T. Hayashi, and T. Sato , Computational study of three-dimensional mag- netohydrodynamic equilibria in toroidal helical systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 81 (1989), pp. 169–192

1989
[90]

Hartwell, S

G. Hartwell, S. Knowlton, J. Hanson, D. Ennis, and D. Maurer , Design, con- struction, and operation of the Compact Toroidal Hybrid, Fusion Science and Technology, 72 (2017), pp. 76–90

2017
[91]

R. D. Hazeltine and J. D. Meiss , Plasma Conﬁnement, Courier Corporation, 2003

2003
[92]

Hegna and A

C. Hegna and A. Bhattacharjee , Islands in three-dimensional steady ﬂows, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 227 (1991), pp. 527–542

1991
[93]

C. C. Hegna and N. Nakajima , On the stability of Mercier and ballooning modes in stellarator conﬁgurations, Physics of Plasmas, 5 (1998), p. 1336

1998
[94]

C. C. Hegna, P. W. Terry, and B. J. F aber , Theory of ITG turbulent saturation in stellarators: identifying mechanisms to reduce turbulent transport, Physics of Plasmas, 25 (2018), p. 022511

2018
[95]

Helander, Theory of plasma conﬁnement in non-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁeld, Reports of Progress in Physics, 77 (2014), p

P. Helander, Theory of plasma conﬁnement in non-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁeld, Reports of Progress in Physics, 77 (2014), p. 087001. 130

2014
[96]

Helander, C

P. Helander, C. Beidler, T. Bird, M. Drevlak, Y. Feng, R. Hatzky, F. Jenko, R. Kleiber, J. Proll, Y. Turkin, et al. , Stellarator and tokamak plasmas: a compari- son, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 54 (2012), p. 124009

2012
[97]

Helander, M

P. Helander, M. Drevlak, M. Zarnstorff, and S. Cowley , Stellarators with perma- nent magnets, Physical Review Letters, 124 (2020), p. 095001

2020
[98]

Helander and J

P. Helander and J. Nührenberg , Bootstrap current and neoclassical transport in quasi- isodynamic stellarators, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 51 (2009), p. 055004

2009
[99]

Helander and D

P. Helander and D. J. Sigmar , Collisional Transport in Magnetized Plasmas, vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, 2005

2005
[100]

Helander and A

P. Helander and A. Simakov , Intrinsic ambipolarity and rotation in stellarators, Physical Review Letters, 101 (2008), p. 145003

2008
[101]

Henneberg, M

S. Henneberg, M. Drevlak, and P. Helander , Improving fast-particle conﬁnement in quasi-axisymmetric stellarator optimization, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 62 (2019), p. 014023

2019
[102]

Henneberg, M

S. Henneberg, M. Drevlak, C. Nührenberg, C. Beidler, Y. Turkin, J. Loizu, and P. Helander , Properties of a new quasi-axisymmetric conﬁguration, Nuclear Fusion, 59 (2019), p. 026014

2019
[103]

J. G. Heywood , Auxiliary ﬂux and pressure conditions for Navier-Stokes problems, in Ap- proximation Methods for Navier-Stokes Problems, R. Rautmann, ed., Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 223–234

1980
[104]

J. G. Heywood, R. Rannacher, and S. Turek , Artiﬁcial boundaries and ﬂux and pressure conditions for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 22 (1996), pp. 325–352

1996
[105]

Hidalgo, C

C. Hidalgo, C. Alejaldre, A. Alonso, J. Alonso, L. Almoguera, F. de Aragón, E. Ascasíbar, A. Baciero, R. Balbín, E. Blanco, et al. , Overview of TJ-II experi- ments, Nuclear Fusion, 45 (2005), p. S266

2005
[106]

Highcock, N

E. Highcock, N. Mandell, M. Barnes, and W. Dorland , Optimisation of conﬁnement in a fusion reactor using a nonlinear turbulence model, Journal of Plasma Physics, 84 (2018)

2018
[107]

Hirsch, J

M. Hirsch, J. Baldzuhn, C. Beidler, R. Brakel, R. Burhenn, A. Dinklage, H. Ehmler, M. Endler, V. Erckmann, Y. Feng, et al. , Major results from the stel- larator Wendelstein 7-AS, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 50 (2008), p. 053001

2008
[108]

Hirshman, P

S. Hirshman, P. Merkel, et al. , Three-dimensional free boundary calculations using a spectral Green’s function method, Computer Physics Communications, 43 (1986), pp. 143– 155

1986
[109]

Hirshman, R

S. Hirshman, R. Sanchez, and C. Cook , SIESTA: A scalable iterative equilibrium solver for toroidal applications, Physics of Plasmas, 18 (2011), p. 062504

2011
[110]

Hirshman, D

S. Hirshman, D. Spong, J. Whitson, B. Nelson, D. Batchelor, J. Lyon, R. Sanchez, A. Brooks, G. Y.-Fu, R. Goldston, et al. , Physics of compact stel- larators, Physics of Plasmas, 6 (1999), pp. 1858–1864

1999
[111]

S. P. Hirshman and J. C. Whitson , Steepest descent moment method for three- dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilibria, The Physics of Fluids, 26 (1983), p. 3553

1983
[112]

Hofmann, J

J. Hofmann, J. Baldzuhn, R. Brakel, Y. Feng, S. Fiedler, J. Geiger, P. Grigull, G. Herre, R. Jaenicke, M. Kick, et al. , Stellarator optimization studies in W7-AS, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 38 (1996), p. A193

1996
[113]

M. Hole, S. R. Hudson, and R. Dew ar , Stepped pressure proﬁle equilibria in cylindrical plasmas via partial Taylor relaxation, Journal of Plasma Physics, 72 (2006), pp. 1167–1171. 131

2006
[114]

R. J. Hosking and R. L. Dew ar , Fundamental ﬂuid mechanics and magnetohydrodynam- ics, Springer, 2016

2016
[115]

J. D. Huba , NRL Plasma Formulary, tech. rep., Naval Research Laboratory, 2006

2006
[116]

Hudson, R

S. Hudson, R. Dew ar, G. Dennis, M. Hole, M. McGann, G. Von Nessi, and S. Lazerson, Computation of multi-region relaxed magnetohydrodynamic equilibria, Physics of Plasmas, 19 (2012), p. 112502

2012
[117]

Hudson and N

S. Hudson and N. Nakajima ,Pressure, chaotic magnetic ﬁelds, and magnetohydrodynamic equilibria, Physics of Plasmas, 17 (2010), p. 052511

2010
[118]

Hudson, C

S. Hudson, C. Zhu, D. Pfefferlé, and L. Gunderson , Diﬀerentiating the shape of stellarator coils with respect to the plasma boundary, Physics Letters A, 382 (2018), pp. 2732– 2737

2018
[119]

S. R. Hudson, R. Dew ar, M. Hole, and M. McGann , Non-axisymmetric, multi-region relaxed magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 54 (2011), p. 014005

2011
[120]

S. R. Hudson, D. Monticello, A. Reiman, A. Boozer, D. Strickler, S. Hirsh- man, and M. Zarnstorff , Eliminating islands in high-pressure free-boundary stellarator magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions, Physical Review Letters, 89 (2002), p. 275003

2002
[121]

Hysing, S

S. Hysing, S. Turek, D. Kuzmin, N. Parolini, E. Burman, S. Ganesan, and L. To- biska, Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics, Interna- tional Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 60 (2009), pp. 1259–1288

2009
[122]

Iiyoshi, A

A. Iiyoshi, A. Komori, A. Ejiri, M. Emoto, H. Funaba, M. Goto, K. Ida, H. Idei, S. Inagaki, S. Kado, et al. , Overview of the Large Helical Device project, Nuclear Fusion, 39 (1999), p. 1245

1999
[123]

Isobe, A

M. Isobe, A. Shimizu, H. Liu, H. Liu, G. Xiong, D. Yin, K. Oga w a, Y. Yoshimura, M. Nakata, S. Kinoshita, et al. , Current status of NIFS-SWJTU joint project for quasi-axisymmetric stellarator CFQS, Plasma and Fusion Research, 14 (2019), pp. 3402074– 3402074

2019
[124]

Jardin, Computational Methods in Plasma Physics, CRC Press, 2010

S. Jardin, Computational Methods in Plasma Physics, CRC Press, 2010

2010
[125]

S. C. Jardin, J. Breslau, and N. Ferraro , A high-order implicit ﬁnite element method for integrating the two-ﬂuid magnetohydrodynamic equations in two dimensions, Journal of Computational Physics, 226 (2007), pp. 2146–2174

2007
[126]

Jorge, P

R. Jorge, P. Ricci, and N. Loureiro , A drift-kinetic analytical model for scrape-oﬀ layer plasma dynamics at arbitrary collisionality, Journal of Plasma Physics, 83 (2017)

2017
[127]

Jorge, W

R. Jorge, W. Sengupta, and M. Landreman , Construction of quasisymmetric stellara- tors using a direct coordinate approach, Nuclear Fusion, (2020)

2020
[128]

Jorge, W

R. Jorge, W. Sengupta, and M. Landreman , Near-axis expansion of stellarator equi- librium at arbitrary order in the distance to the axis, Journal of Plasma Physics, 86 (2020)

2020
[129]

V. Jose, J. José, and E. Saletan , Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach, Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach, Cambridge University Press, 1998

1998
[130]

Kaneko, Large Helical Device, in Magnetic Fusion Energy, Elsevier, 2016, pp

O. Kaneko, Large Helical Device, in Magnetic Fusion Energy, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 469–491

2016
[131]

Klinger, C

T. Klinger, C. Baylard, C. Beidler, J. Boscary, H. Bosch, A. Dinklage, D. Hartmann, P. Helander, H. Massberg, A. Peacock, T. Pedersen, T. Rummel, F. Schauer, L. Wegener, and R. Wolf , Towards assembly completion and preparation of experimental campaigns of Wendelstein 7-X in t...

2013
[132]

A. N. Kolmogorov, On conservation of conditionally periodic motions for a small change in Hamilton’s function, in Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 98, 1954, pp. 527–530

1954
[133]

Komori, T

A. Komori, T. Morisaki, T. Mutoh, S. Sakakibara, Y. Takeiri, R. Kumaza w a, S. Kubo, K. Ida, S. Morita, K. Narihara, et al. , Overview of progress in LHD exper- iments, Fusion Science and Technology, 50 (2006), pp. 136–145

2006
[134]

Komori, N

A. Komori, N. Ohyabu, H. Yamada, O. Kaneko, K. Ka w ahata, K. Ida, Y. Naka- mura, T. Akiyama, N. Ashika w a, M. Emoto, et al. , Recent results from the Large Helical Device, 45 (2003), p. 671

2003
[135]

M. G. Kong, G. Kroesen, G. Morfill, T. Nosenko, T. Shimizu, J. v an Dijk, and J. L. Zimmermann , Plasma medicine: an introductory review, New Journal of Physics, 11 (2009), p. 115012

2009
[136]

V. V. Kozlov, Integrability and non-integrability in Hamiltonian mechanics, Russian Math- ematical Surveys, 38 (1983), p. 1

1983
[137]

Kress,On constant-alpha force-free ﬁelds in a torus, JournalofEngineeringMathematics, 20 (1986), pp

R. Kress,On constant-alpha force-free ﬁelds in a torus, JournalofEngineeringMathematics, 20 (1986), pp. 323–344

1986
[138]

82, Springer, 1989

, Linear integral equations, vol. 82, Springer, 1989

1989
[139]

J. A. Krommes and A. H. Reiman , Plasma equilibrium in a magnetic ﬁeld with stochastic regions, Physics of Plasmas, 16 (2009), p. 072308

2009
[140]

M. D. Kruskal and R. Kulsrud , Equilibrium of a magnetically conﬁned plasma in a toroid, The Physics of Fluids, 1 (1958), pp. 265–274

1958
[141]

Ku and A

L. Ku and A. Boozer , New classes of quasi-helically symmetric stellarators, Nuclear Fu- sion, 51 (2010), p. 013004

2010
[142]

L. Ku, P. Garabedian, J. Lyon, A. Turnbull, A. Grossman, T. Mau, M. Zarn- storff, and A. Team , Physics design for ARIES-CS, Fusion Science and Technology, 54 (2008), pp. 673–693

2008
[143]

Kuberry, A

P. Kuberry, A. Larios, L. G. Rebholz, and N. E. Wilson , Numerical approximation of the Voigt regularization for incompressible Navier–Stokes and magnetohydrodynamic ﬂows, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 64 (2012), pp. 2647–2662

2012
[144]

Landreman, Electric Fields and Transport in Optimized Stellarators, PhD thesis, MIT, 2011

M. Landreman, Electric Fields and Transport in Optimized Stellarators, PhD thesis, MIT, 2011

2011
[145]

Landreman, An improved current potential method for fast computation of stellarator coil shapes, Nuclear Fusion, 57 (2017), p

M. Landreman, An improved current potential method for fast computation of stellarator coil shapes, Nuclear Fusion, 57 (2017), p. 046003

2017
[146]

, Optimized quasisymmetric stellarators are consistent with the Garren–Boozer con- struction, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 61 (2019), p. 075001

2019
[147]

, Quasisymmetry: A hidden symmetry of magnetic ﬁelds, (2019)

2019
[148]

Landreman and A

M. Landreman and A. H. Boozer , Eﬃcient magnetic ﬁelds for supporting toroidal plas- mas, Physics of Plasmas, 23 (2016), p. 032506

2016
[149]

Landreman and P

M. Landreman and P. J. Catto , Omnigenity as generalized quasisymmetry, Physics of Plasmas, 19 (2012), p. 056103

2012
[150]

Landreman and W

M. Landreman and W. Sengupta , Direct construction of optimized stellarator shapes. Part 1. Theory in cylindrical coordinates, Journal of Plasma Physics, 84 (2018)

2018
[151]

Landreman, W

M. Landreman, W. Sengupta, and G. G. Plunk , Direct construction of optimized stellarator shapes. Part 2. Numerical quasisymmetric solutions, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85 (2019). 133

2019
[152]

Larios and E

A. Larios and E. S. Titi , Higher-order global regularity of an inviscid Voigt-regularization of the three-dimensional inviscid resistive magnetohydrodynamic equations, Journal of Math- ematical Fluid Mechanics, 16 (2014), pp. 59–76

2014
[153]

Lax, Functional analysis, Pure and applied mathematics, Wiley, 2002

P. Lax, Functional analysis, Pure and applied mathematics, Wiley, 2002

2002
[154]

S. A. Lazerson, J. Loizu, S. Hirshman, and S. R. Hudson , Veriﬁcation of the ideal magnetohydrodynamic response at rational surfaces in the VMEC code, Physics of Plasmas, 23 (2016), p. 012507

2016
[155]

D. Lee, J. Harris, and G. Lee , Magnetic island widths due to ﬁeld perturbations in toroidal stellarators, Nuclear Fusion, 30 (1990), p. 2177

1990
[156]

Levchenko, S

I. Levchenko, S. Xu, G. Teel, D. Mariotti, M. W alker, and M. Keidar , Recent progress and perspectives of space electric propulsion systems based on smart nanomaterials, Nature Communications, 9 (2018), p. 879

2018
[157]

A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman , Regular and stochastic motion, vol. 38, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

2013
[158]

M. A. Lieberman, A. J. Lichtenberg, et al. , Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, vol. 2, Wiley Online Library, 2005

2005
[159]

R. G. Littlejohn , Variational principles of guiding centre motion, Journal of Plasma Physics, 29 (1983), pp. 111–125

1983
[160]

Lobsien, M

J.-F. Lobsien, M. Drevlak, T. Kruger, S. Lazerson, C. Zhu, and T. S. Pedersen , Improved performance of stellarator coil design optimization, Journal of Plasma Physics, 86 (2020), p. 815860202

2020
[161]

Lobsien, M

J.-F. Lobsien, M. Drevlak, T. S. Pedersen, et al. , Stellarator coil optimization to- wards higher engineering tolerances, Nuclear Fusion, 58 (2018), p. 106013

2018
[162]

Loizu, S

J. Loizu, S. Hudson, A. Bhattacharjee, and P. Helander , Magnetic islands and singular currents at rational surfaces in three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilibria, Physics of Plasmas, 22 (2015), p. 022501

2015
[163]

J. D. Lore, T. Andreev a, J. Boscary, S. Bozhenkov, J. Geiger, J. H. Harris, H. Hoelbe, A. Lumsdaine, D. McGinnis, A. Peacock, et al. , Design and analysis of divertor scraper elements for the W7-X stellarator, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 42 (2014), pp. 539–544

2014
[164]

Malhotra, A

D. Malhotra, A. Cerfon, L.-M. Imbert-Gérard, and M. O’Neil , Taylor states in stellarators: A fast high-order boundary integral solver, Journal of Computational Physics, 397 (2019), p. 108791

2019
[165]

McCormick, P

K. McCormick, P. Grigull, R. Burhenn, R. Brakel, H. Ehmler, Y. Feng, F. Gadelmeier, L. Giannone, D. Hildebrandt, M. Hirsch, et al. , New advanced operational regime on the W7-AS stellarator, Physical Review Letters, 89 (2002), p. 015001

2002
[166]

McMillan and S

M. McMillan and S. A. Lazerson , BEAMS3D neutral beam injection model, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 56 (2014), p. 095019

2014
[167]

Mercier , Equilibrium and stability of a toroidal magnetohydrodynamic system in the neighbourhood of a magnetic axis, Nuclear Fusion, 4 (1964), p

C. Mercier , Equilibrium and stability of a toroidal magnetohydrodynamic system in the neighbourhood of a magnetic axis, Nuclear Fusion, 4 (1964), p. 213

1964
[168]

Mercier and H

C. Mercier and H. Luc , The MHD approach to the problem of plasma conﬁnement in closed magnetic conﬁgurations, Lectures in Plasma Physics, Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, (1974)

1974
[169]

Merkel, An integral equation technique for the exterior and interior Neumann problem in toroidal regions, Journal of Computational Physics, 66 (1986), pp

P. Merkel, An integral equation technique for the exterior and interior Neumann problem in toroidal regions, Journal of Computational Physics, 66 (1986), pp. 83–98

1986
[170]

, Solution of stellarator boundary value problems with external currents, Nuclear Fusion, 27 (1987), p. 867. 134

1987
[171]

Mikhailov, J

M. Mikhailov, J. Nührenberg, and R. Zille , Elimination of current sheets at reso- nances in three-dimensional toroidal ideal-magnetohydrodynamic equilibria, Nuclear Fusion, 59 (2019), p. 066002

2019
[172]

Moff att, Magnetostatic equilibria and analogous euler ﬂows of arbitrarily complex topol- ogy

H. Moff att, Magnetostatic equilibria and analogous euler ﬂows of arbitrarily complex topol- ogy. Part 1. Fundamentals, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 159 (1985), pp. 359–378

1985
[173]

J. J. Moré , The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory, in Numerical analysis, Springer, 1978, pp. 105–116

1978
[174]

P. J. Morrison , Hamiltonian description of the ideal ﬂuid, Reviews of Modern Physics, 70 (1998), p. 467

1998
[175]

Moser , On invariant curves of area-preserving mappings of an annulus, Nachr

J. Moser , On invariant curves of area-preserving mappings of an annulus, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, II, (1962), pp. 1–20

1962
[176]

Murakami, A

S. Murakami, A. W akasa, H. Maaßberg, C. Beidler, H. Yamada, K. W atanabe, L. E. Group, et al. , Neoclassical transport optimization of LHD,NuclearFusion, 42(2002), p. L19

2002
[177]

Murakami, H

S. Murakami, H. Yamada, M. Sasao, M. Isobe, T. Ozaki, T. Saida, P. Goncharov, J. Lyon, M. Osakabe, T. Seki, et al. , Eﬀect of neoclassical transport optimization on energetic ion conﬁnement in LHD, Fusion Science and Technology, 46 (2004), pp. 241–247

2004
[178]

Mynick, Transport optimization in stellarators, Physics of Plasmas, 13 (2006), p

H. Mynick, Transport optimization in stellarators, Physics of Plasmas, 13 (2006), p. 058102

2006
[179]

H. E. Mynick, N. Pomphrey, and S. Ethier , Exploration of stellarator conﬁguration space with global search methods, Physics of Plasmas, 9 (2002), pp. 869–876

2002
[180]

Najmabadi, A

F. Najmabadi, A. Raffray, S. Abdel-Khalik, L. Bromberg, L. Crosatti, L. El- Guebaly, P. Garabedian, A. Grossman, D. Henderson, A. Ibrahim, et al. , The ARIES-CS compact stellarator fusion power plant, Fusion Science and Technology, 54 (2008), pp. 655–672

2008
[181]

Nemov, S

V. Nemov, S. Kasilov, W. Kernbichler, and M. Heyn , Evaluation of 1/ν neoclassical transport in stellarators, Physics of Plasmas, 6 (1999), pp. 4622–4632

1999
[182]

Nemov, S

V. Nemov, S. Kasilov, W. Kernbichler, and G. Leitold , Poloidal motion of trapped particle orbits in real-space coordinates, Physics of Plasmas, 15 (2008), p. 052501

2008
[183]

D. R. Nicholson , Introduction to Plasma Theory, Wiley New York, 1983

1983
[184]

Nishimura, K

K. Nishimura, K. Matsuoka, M. Fujiw ara, K. Yamazaki, J. Todoroki, T. Kamimura, T. Amano, H. Sanuki, S. Okamura, M. Hosoka w a, et al. , Compact Helical System physics and engineering design, Fusion Technology, 17 (1990), pp. 86–100

1990
[185]

Nührenberg, W

J. Nührenberg, W. Lotz, and S. Gori , Theory of fusion plasmas, in Proceedings of the Joint Varenna-Lausanne International Workshop, 1994, p. 3

1994
[186]

Nührenberg and R

J. Nührenberg and R. Zille , Quasi-helically symmetric toroidal stellarators, Physics Letters A, 129 (1988), pp. 113–117

1988
[187]

O’Neil and A

M. O’Neil and A. J. Cerfon, An integral equation-based numerical solver for Taylor states in toroidal geometries, Journal of Computational Physics, 359 (2018), pp. 263–282

2018
[188]

Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press, 2002, ch

E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press, 2002, ch. 7

2002
[189]

K. E. Parsopoulos and M. N. Vrahatis , Recent approaches to global optimization prob- lems through particle swarm optimization, Natural Computing, 1 (2002), pp. 235–306

2002
[190]

E. Paul, M. Landreman, A. Bader, and W. Dorland , An adjoint method for gradient- based optimization of stellarator coil shapes, Nuclear Fusion, 58 (2018), p. 076015

2018
[191]

E. J. Paul, I. G. Abel, M. Landreman, and W. Dorland , An adjoint method for neoclassical stellarator optimization, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85 (2019). 135

2019
[192]

T. S. Pedersen, M. Otte, S. Lazerson, P. Helander, S. Bozhenkov, C. Bieder- mann, T. Klinger, R. C. Wolf, H.-S. Bosch, T. Wendelstein, et al. , Conﬁrmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X magnetic ﬁeld to better than 1: 100,000, Nature Communications, 7 (2016), p. 13493

2016
[193]

Plunk, Perturbing an axisymmetric magnetic equilibrium to obtain a quasi-axisymmetric stellarator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02981, (2020)

G. Plunk, Perturbing an axisymmetric magnetic equilibrium to obtain a quasi-axisymmetric stellarator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02981, (2020)

2020 arXiv
[194]

Plunk and P

G. Plunk and P. Helander , Quasi-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁelds: weakly non- axisymmetric case in a vacuum, Journal of Plasma Physics, 84 (2018)

2018
[195]

G. G. Plunk, M. Landreman, and P. Helander , Direct construction of optimized stel- larator shapes. Part 3. Omnigenity near the magnetic axis, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85 (2019)

2019
[196]

Pomphrey, L

N. Pomphrey, L. Berry, A. Boozer, A. Brooks, R. Hatcher, S. Hirshman, L.-P. Ku, W. Miner, H. Mynick, W. Reiersen, et al. , Innovations in compact stellarator coil design, Nuclear Fusion, 41 (2001), p. 339

2001
[197]

Pozrikidis , Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 1992

C. Pozrikidis , Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 1992

1992
[198]

Reiman, G

A. Reiman, G. Fu, S. Hirshman, L. Ku, D. Monticello, H. Mynick, M. Redi, D. Spong, M. Zarnstorff, B. Blackwell, et al. , Physics design of a high-quasi- axisymmetric stellarator, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 41 (1999), p. B273

1999
[199]

Reiman and H

A. Reiman and H. Greenside , Calculation of three-dimesnional MHD equilibria with is- lands and stochastic regions, Computer Physics Communications, 43 (1986), p. 157

1986
[200]

Reiman, M

A. Reiman, M. Zarnstorff, D. Monticello, A. Weller, J. Geiger, et al. , Pressure-induced breaking of equilibrium ﬂux surfaces in the W7-AS stellarator, Nuclear Fu- sion, 47 (2007), p. 572

2007
[201]

Rodriguez, P

E. Rodriguez, P. Helander, and A. Bhattacharjee , Necessary and suﬃcient condi- tions for quasisymmetry, Physics of Plasmas, 27 (2020), p. 062501

2020
[202]

Sakakibara, K

S. Sakakibara, K. W atanabe, Y. Suzuki, Y. Narushima, S. Ohdachi, N. Nakajima, F. W atanabe, L. Garcia, A. Weller, K. Toi, et al. , MHD study of the reactor- relevant high-beta regime in the Large Helical Device, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 50 (2008), p. 124014

2008
[203]

Sanchez, M

R. Sanchez, M. Y. Isaev, S. Hirshman, W. Cooper, G. Fu, J. Jimenez, L. Ku, M. Mikhailov, D. Monticello, A. Reiman, et al. , Ideal MHD stability calculations for compact stellarators, Computer Physics Communications, 141 (2001), pp. 55–65

2001
[204]

F. Sano, T. Obiki, M. W akatani, K. KONDO, and T. MIZUUCHI , Experimental program of Heliotron J, J. Plasma and Fusion Res. SERIES, 3 (2000), p. 26

2000
[205]

D. D. Schnack , Lectures in magnetohydrodynamics: with an appendix on extended MHD, vol. 780, Springer, 2009

2009
[206]

Sengupta, Stellarator equilibrium axis-expansion to all orders in distance from the axis for arbitrary plasma beta

W. Sengupta, Stellarator equilibrium axis-expansion to all orders in distance from the axis for arbitrary plasma beta. In preparation
[207]

Sermange and R

M. Sermange and R. Temam , Some mathematical questions related to the MHD equations, (1983)

1983
[208]

J. N. Shadid, R. P. Pa wlowski, E. C. Cyr, R. S. Tuminaro, L. Chacón, and P. Weber , Scalable implicit incompressible resistive MHD with stabilized FE and fully- coupled Newton–Krylov-AMG, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 304 (2016), pp. 1–25

2016
[209]

Shaing, E

K.-C. Shaing, E. Crume Jr, J. Tolliver, S. Hirshman, and W. V an Rij , Bootstrap current and parallel viscosity in the low collisionality regime in toroidal plasmas, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, 1 (1989), p. 148. 136

1989
[210]

Shimizu, H

A. Shimizu, H. Liu, M. Isobe, S. Okamura, S. Nishimura, C. Suzuki, Y. Xu, X. Zhang, B. Liu, J. Huang, et al. , Conﬁguration property of the Chinese First Quasi- Axisymmetric Stellarator, Plasma and Fusion Research, 13 (2018), pp. 3403123–3403123

2018
[211]

Sinclair, J

R. Sinclair, J. Hosea, and G. Sheffield , Magnetic surface mappings by storage of phase-stabilized low-energy electron beams, Applied Physics Letters, 17 (1970), p. 92

1970
[212]

Singh, T

L. Singh, T. Kruger, C. Zhu, S. Hudson, D. Anderson, and A. Bader , A new method for the optimization of ﬁnite build stellarator coils, APS, 2019 (2019), pp. JP10–037

2019
[213]

Solovèv and V

L. Solovèv and V. Shafranov , Plasma conﬁnement in closed magnetic systems, in Re- views of Plasma Physics, Springer, 1970, pp. 1–247

1970
[214]

Sovinec, A

C. Sovinec, A. Glasser, T. Gianakon, D. Barnes, R. Nebel, S. Kruger, S. Plimp- ton, A. Tarditi, M. Chu, and the NIMROD Team , Nonlinear magnetohydrodynamics with high-order ﬁnite elements, J. Comp. Phys., 195 (2004), p. 355

2004
[215]

Spitzer Jr , The stellarator concept, The Physics of Fluids, 1 (1958), pp

L. Spitzer Jr , The stellarator concept, The Physics of Fluids, 1 (1958), pp. 253–264

1958
[216]

Spitzer Jr and R

L. Spitzer Jr and R. Härm , Transport phenomena in a completely ionized gas, Physical Review, 89 (1953), p. 977

1953
[217]

Spong, S

D. Spong, S. Hirshman, J. Whitson, D. Batchelor, B. Carreras, V. Lynch, and J. Rome, J* optimization of small aspect ratio stellarator/tokamak hybrid devices, Physics of Plasmas, 5 (1998), pp. 1752–1758

1998
[218]

Spong, S

D. Spong, S. P. Hirshman, L. Berry, J. Lyon, R. Fowler, D. Strickler, M. Cole, B. Nelson, D. Williamson, A. W are, et al. , Physics issues of compact drift optimized stellarators, Nuclear Fusion, 41 (2001), p. 711

2001
[219]

D. A. Spong , Three-dimensional eﬀects on energetic particle conﬁnement and stability, Physics of Plasmas, 18 (2011), p. 056109

2011
[220]

D. A. Spong and J. H. Harris , New QP / QI Symmetric Stellarator Conﬁgurations, Plasma and Fusion Research, 5 (2010), p. S2039

2010
[221]

T. H. Stix , Highlights in early stellarator research at Princeton, J. Plasma Fusion Res. Ser, 1 (1998), pp. 3–8

1998
[222]

Storn and K

R. Storn and K. Price , Diﬀerential evolution–a simple and eﬃcient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, Journal of Global Optimization, 11 (1997), pp. 341–359

1997
[223]

Stratton, A

B. Stratton, A. Brooks, T. Brown, D. Johnson, G. Labik, E. Lazarus, N. Pom- phrey, S. Raftopoulos, and M. Zarnstorff , External magnetic diagnostics for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment, Review of Scientiﬁc Instruments, 77 (2006), p. 10E314

2006
[224]

D. J. Strickler, L. A. Berry, and S. P. Hirshman , Designing coils for compact stel- larators, Fusion Science and Technology, 41 (2002), pp. 107–115

2002
[225]

D. J. Strickler, L. A. Berry, and S. P. Hirshman , Integrated plasma and coil opti- mization for compact stellarators, tech. rep., 2003

2003
[226]

D. J. Strickler, S. P. Hirshman, D. A. Spong, M. J. Cole, J. F. Lyon, B. E. Nelson, D. E. Williamson, and A. S. W are , Development of a robust quasi-poloidal compact stellarator, Fusion Science and Technology, 45 (2004), pp. 15–26

2004
[227]

Strykowsky, T

R. Strykowsky, T. Brown, J. Chrzanowski, M. Cole, P. Heitzenroeder, G. Neil- son, D. Rej, and M. Viol , Engineering cost & schedule lessons learned on NCSX, in 2009 23rd IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–4

2009
[228]

S. Sudo, Y. Takeiri, H. Zushi, F. Sano, K. Itoh, K. Kondo, and A. Iiyoshi , Scalings of energy conﬁnement and density limit in stellarator/heliotron devices, Nuclear Fusion, 30 (1990), p. 11. 137

1990
[229]

Sugiyama, W

L. Sugiyama, W. Park, H. Strauss, S. Hudson, D. Stutman, and X.-Z. Tang , Studies of spherical tori, stellarators and anisotropic pressure with the M3D code, Nuclear Fusion, 41 (2001), p. 739

2001
[230]

Sunn Pedersen, A

T. Sunn Pedersen, A. Dinklage, Y. Turkin, R. Wolf, S. Bozhenkov, J. Geiger, G. Fuchert, H.-S. Bosch, K. Rahbarnia, H. Thomsen, et al. , Key results from the ﬁrst plasma operation phase and outlook for future performance in Wendelstein 7-X, Physics of Plasmas, 24 (2017), p. 055503

2017
[231]

, Key results from the ﬁrst plasma operation phase and outlook for future performance in Wendelstein 7-X, Physics of Plasmas, 24 (2017), p. 055503

2017
[232]

Suzuki, K

Y. Suzuki, K. Ida, K. Kamiya, M. Yoshinuma, S. Sakakibara, K. W atanabe, H. Ya- mada, L. E. Group, et al. , 3D plasma response to the magnetic ﬁeld structure in the Large Helical Device, Nuclear Fusion, 53 (2013), p. 073045

2013
[233]

Suzuki, N

Y. Suzuki, N. Nakajima, K. W atanabe, Y. Nakamura, and T. Hayashi , Development and application of HINT2 to helical system plasmas, Nuclear Fusion, 46 (2006), p. L19

2006
[234]

Suzuki, K

Y. Suzuki, K. W atanabe, H. Funaba, S. Sakakibara, N. Nakajima, N. Ohyabu, L. E. Group, et al. , Eﬀects of the stochasticity on transport properties in high-β LHD, Plasma and Fusion Research, 4 (2009), pp. 036–036

2009
[235]

J. B. Taylor , Relaxation of toroidal plasma and generation of reverse magnetic ﬁelds, Physical Review Letters, 33 (1974), p. 1139

1974
[236]

J. B. Taylor,Relaxation and magnetic reconnection in plasmas, Rev.Mod.Phys., 58(1986), pp. 741–763

1986
[237]

A. N. Tikhonov , On the solution of ill-posed problems and the method of regularization, in Doklady Akademii Nauk, vol. 151, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1963, pp. 501–504

1963
[238]

Turek, O

S. Turek, O. Mierka, and K. Bäumler , Numerical benchmarking for 3D multiphase ﬂow: New results for a rising bubble, in Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2017, F. A. Radu, K. Kumar, I. Berre, J. M. Nordbotten, and I. S. Pop, eds., Cham, 2019, Springer Int...

2017
[239]

J. G. V an Bladel, Electromagnetic ﬁelds, vol. 19, John Wiley & Sons, 2007

2007
[240]

W agner, Stellarators and optimised stellarators, Fusion Technology, 33 (1998), pp

F. W agner, Stellarators and optimised stellarators, Fusion Technology, 33 (1998), pp. 67–83

1998
[241]

W akatani and S

M. W akatani and S. Sudo,Overview of Heliotron E results, PlasmaPhysicsandControlled Fusion, 38 (1996), p. 937

1996
[242]

Weitzner, Ideal magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium in a non-symmetric topological torus, Physics of Plasmas, 21 (2014), p

H. Weitzner, Ideal magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium in a non-symmetric topological torus, Physics of Plasmas, 21 (2014), p. 022515

2014
[243]

Weitzner , Expansions of non-symmetric toroidal magnetohydrodynamic equilibria , Physics of Plasmas, 23 (2016), p

H. Weitzner , Expansions of non-symmetric toroidal magnetohydrodynamic equilibria , Physics of Plasmas, 23 (2016), p. 062512

2016
[244]

Weller, S

A. Weller, S. Sakakibara, K. W atanabe, K. Toi, J. Geiger, M. Zarnstorff, S. Hudson, A. Reiman, A. Werner, C. Nührenberg, et al. , Signiﬁcance of MHD eﬀects in stellarator conﬁnement, Fusion Science and Technology, 50 (2006), p. 158

2006
[245]

Wesson and D

J. Wesson and D. J. Campbell , Tokamaks, vol. 149, Oxford University Press, 2011

2011
[246]

C. H. Willis , Design and construction of Model A stellarator, tech. rep., Princeton Univ., NJ Project Matterhorn, 1953

1953
[247]

G. M. Wing , A primer on integral equations of the ﬁrst kind: the problem of deconvolution and unfolding, vol. 27, SIAM, 1991

1991
[248]

R. Wolf, A. Alonso, S. Äkäslompolo, J. Baldzuhn, M. Beurskens, C. Beidler, C. Biedermann, H.-S. Bosch, S. Bozhenkov, R. Brakel, et al. , Performance of Wendelstein 7-X stellarator plasmas during the ﬁrst divertor operation phase, Physics of Plasmas, 26 (2019), p. 082504. 138

2019
[249]

Wu, Generalized MHD equations, Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 195 (2003), pp

J. Wu, Generalized MHD equations, Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 195 (2003), pp. 284– 312

2003
[250]

G. A. Wurden, C. Biedermann, F. Effenberg, M. Jakubowski, H. Niemann, L. Stephey, S. Bozhenkov, S. Brezinsek, J. Fellinger, B. Cannas, et al. , Limiter observations during W7-X ﬁrst plasmas, Nuclear Fusion, 57 (2017), p. 056036

2017
[251]

Xanthopoulos, H

P. Xanthopoulos, H. Mynick, P. Helander, Y. Turkin, G. Plunk, F. Jenko, T. Görler, D. Told, T. Bird, and J. Proll , Controlling turbulence in present and future stellarators, Physical Review Letters, 113 (2014), p. 155001

2014
[252]

Yamada, K

H. Yamada, K. W atanabe, K. Yamazaki, S. Murakami, S. Sakakibara, K. Nar- ihara, K. Tanaka, M. Osakabe, K. Ida, N. Ashika w a, et al. , Energy conﬁnement and thermal transport characteristics of net current free plasmas in the Large Helical Device, Nuclear Fusion, 41 (2001), p. 901

2001
[253]

Yamazaki, O

K. Yamazaki, O. Motojima, and M. Asao , Design scalings and optimization for the superconducting Large Helical Device, Fusion Technology, 21 (1992), pp. 147–160

1992
[254]

Yoccoz , An Introduction To Small Divisors Problems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992, pp

J.-C. Yoccoz , An Introduction To Small Divisors Problems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992, pp. 659–679

1992
[255]

Yokoyama, K

M. Yokoyama, K. Itoh, S. Okamura, K. Matsuoka, and S.-I. Itoh , Maximum-J capability in a quasiaxisymmetric stellarator, Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2001), p. 015401

2001
[256]

Yokoyama, Y

M. Yokoyama, Y. Nakamura, and M. W akatani , An optimized helical axis stellarator with modulated l=1 helical coil, J. Plasma Fusion Res, 73 (1997), pp. 723–731

1997
[257]

Yoshika w a and T

S. Yoshika w a and T. Stix , Experiments on the Model C stellarator, Nuclear Fusion, 25 (1985), p. 1275

1985
[258]

L. E. Zakharov , Implementation of Hamada principle in calculations of nested 3-D equi- libria, Journal of Plasma Physics, 81 (2015)

2015
[259]

Zarnstorff, L

M. Zarnstorff, L. Berry, A. Brooks, E. Fredrickson, G. Fu, S. Hirshman, S. Hudson, L. Ku, E. Lazarus, D. Mikkelsen, et al. , Physics of the compact ad- vanced stellarator NCSX, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 43 (2001), p. A237

2001
[260]

Zarnstorff, A

M. Zarnstorff, A. Weller, J. Geiger, E. Fredrickson, S. Hudson, J. Knauer, A. Reiman, A. Dinklage, G. Fu, L. Ku, et al. , 20th IAEA fusion energy conference, tech. rep., EX/3-4 (IAEA, Vilamoura, 2004), 2004

2004
[261]

C. Zhu, K. Hammond, T. G. Brown, D. A. Gates, M. C. Zarnstorff, K. Corrigan, M. Sibilia, and E. Feibush , Topology optimization of permanent magnets for stellarators, Nuclear Fusion, (2020)

2020
[262]

C. Zhu, S. R. Hudson, Y. Song, and Y. W an , New method to design stellarator coils without the winding surface, Nuclear Fusion, 58 (2018), p. 016008

2018
[263]

C. Zhu, M. Zarnstorff, D. Gates, and A. Brooks , Designing stellarators using per- pendicular permanent magnets, Nuclear Fusion, 60 (2020), p. 076016. 139

2020
[2015]

Accessed: 2018-03-05

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

https://hiddensymmetries.princeton.edu/meetings/simons-hour-talks

[2] [2]

https://lasers.llnl.gov/about/how-nif-works

How NIF works. https://lasers.llnl.gov/about/how-nif-works. Accessed: 2019-08-14

2019

[3] [3]

date accessed: 01/03/2019

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory - Timeline. date accessed: 01/03/2019

2019

[4] [4]

Accessed: 2019-08-14

What will ITER do? https://www.iter.org/sci/Goals. Accessed: 2019-08-14

2019

[5] [5]

https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_ 2146333/component/file_2146332/content#page=197, 2012

IPP Summer University for Plasma Physics. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_ 2146333/component/file_2146332/content#page=197, 2012. Accessed: 2020-06-15

2012

[6] [6]

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/four

The Hamiltonian formalism. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/four. pdf, 2015. Accessed: 2018-03-05

2015

[7] [7]

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/two.pdf,

The Lagrangian formalism. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/two.pdf,

[8] [8]

https://www.ipp.mpg.de/2523775/ konzeptentwicklung, 2018

Magnetic Coils and Plasma from Wendelstein 7-X. https://www.ipp.mpg.de/2523775/ konzeptentwicklung, 2018. Accessed: 2018-10-04

work page arXiv 2018