Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 81 references

Noncommutativity and the Weak Cosmic Censorship

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A high-frequency noncommutative scalar probe dresses a naked singularity in AdS3 as a BTZ black hole, giving it a horizon, thermodynamics, quasinormal modes, and quantum completeness.

desk verdict This paper extends an earlier noncommutative BTZ duality to naked singularities with some clean algebra, but the central 'dressing' claim is an interpretation that the paper's own fixed-background setup cannot support. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07402 v1 pith:ECONSIW7 submitted 2019-08-20 hep-th gr-qc

Kumar S. Gupta , Tajron Jurić , Andjelo Samsarov , Ivica Smolić This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords weakcosmiccensorshipnakedsingularityBTZblackholenoncommutativespacetimekappa-Minkowskideformationdualityquasinormalmodesquantumcompleteness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that spacetime noncommutativity can enforce weak cosmic censorship in a toy model: a massless noncommutative scalar probe sent into a naked singularity in $AdS_3$ can dress it as an ordinary BTZ black hole, hiding the singularity behind an event horizon. The mechanism is a duality between a massless noncommutative scalar on a spinless BTZ background of mass $M$ and a massive commutative scalar on a rotating BTZ background with modified mass $M'$ and angular momentum $J'$. For a negative-mass naked singularity $M=-|M|$ and probe frequencies in a specified high-energy range, the dual parameters satisfy $M'>0$ and $J'=0$, giving a single-horizon BTZ geometry with $r_+ = l\sqrt{M'}$. If correct, the dressed object obeys the laws of black hole thermodynamics, has calculable entropy and quasinormal modes, and can be quantum complete under a bound on the noncommutative parameter. The duality also produces a very light scalar field that the paper connects to early-universe cosmology.

What carries the argument

The central object is the noncommutative duality between a $\kappa$-Minkowski-deformed massless scalar probe on a spinless BTZ background and a commutative massive scalar field on a rotating BTZ background. The mapping works because the first-order noncommutative corrections to the radial Klein-Gordon equation preserve its hypergeometric form; a coordinate transformation relocates the would-be horizon, and the coefficients $A$, $B$, $C$ are reinterpreted as the mass $M'$, angular momentum $J'$, and induced scalar mass $\mu'$ of a dual BTZ spacetime. This re-parameterized effective metric is the load-bearing object that turns a negative-mass singularity into a positive-mass black hole.

What would settle it

Compute the semiclassical Einstein equations with the noncommutative scalar field's stress-energy tensor as the source instead of keeping the background fixed, and check whether any horizon appears around the curvature singularity for $M<0$ in the frequency window (34); if no horizon forms, the dressing is an artifact of the dual re-parameterization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The center of the paper is the claim that the effective geometry seen by a noncommutative probe is not the original background but a dual BTZ metric whose mass and angular momentum are shifted by first-order corrections in the deformation parameter $L_{NC}=-a\beta$. Starting from $M=-|M|$, $J=0$, the dual parameters are $M' = |M|(4 L_{NC}|M|/(l^2\omega)-1)$ and $J'=0$ when the probe frequency lies in the window $|m|/l \ll \omega < 4 L_{NC}|M|/l^2$. Thus the former naked singularity acquires an event horizon at $r_+ = l\sqrt{M'}$ and becomes a massive, nonrotating BTZ black hole with $M'>0$. The paper concludes that this dressed singularity satisfies all the laws of black hole thermodynamics, carries the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy $S = (\pi/2) l \sqrt{|M|} \sqrt{4 L_{NC}|M|/(l^2\omega)-1}$, displays the standard BTZ quasinormal-mode spectrum, and is quantum complete when the parameter $f$ controlling the mass shift obeys $1/|M| \le f \le l^2/|M|^2 + 1/|M|$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the dual effective metric obtained by re-parameterizing the scalar wave equation describes the actual physical geometry of the dressed singularity, even though the probe is treated as a test field that does not backreact on the fixed background metric.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any non-zero $L_{NC}$, sufficiently energetic massless probes put the negative-mass singularity behind a horizon, so weak cosmic censorship is restored in this $2+1$ toy model; only low-frequency probes with $0<\omega<|m|/l$ fail to dress it.
  • The dressed geometry is thermodynamically a spinless BTZ black hole: it has positive entropy, obeys the laws of black hole mechanics, and has left/right temperatures $T_{L/R} = (r_+ \mp r_-)/(2\pi l^2)$.
  • An asymptotic observer can measure the quasinormal-mode frequencies of the dressed object and read off $M'$ and $J'$, identifying the former naked singularity as a black hole.
  • When the bound (48) holds, the effective spacetime is quantum complete: test scalar fields have a unique, unitary time evolution despite the singular origin.
  • The duality generates a light scalar with mass $\mu'^2 = 12 L_{NC}\omega/l^2$, which the paper suggests as a candidate for quintessence or fuzzy dark matter in early-universe cosmology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper never computes the probe's back-reaction; including the scalar stress-energy in the Einstein equations is the natural check of whether the dual metric is really the physical spacetime or just a re-parameterization of the wave equation.
  • The analysis is first order in the deformation parameter: extending the duality to all orders in $L_{NC}$ could either widen or close the dressing window (34), so the frequency range for censorship is not yet a robust prediction.
  • Because the induced scalar mass depends on the probe frequency, the cosmological byproduct field would be frequency-dependent; the paper does not explore how that affects quintessence or dark-matter applications.
  • The same mechanism should be tested in higher dimensions and with massive probes; the paper mentions a $3+1$ extension only as future work, so it is an open question whether noncommutative dressing survives outside the BTZ toy model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper considers a massless scalar field on κ-Minkowski noncommutative spacetime propagating in a fixed BTZ-type AdS3 background (6) with M = -|M|, i.e., a naked singularity. It invokes a duality from earlier work to map the radial equation (11) for the NC probe to the radial equation (18) of a massive commutative scalar in an auxiliary spinning BTZ metric (19), with parameters M' and J' given in (13)/(22). After showing that the horizon inequalities (25) cannot be satisfied for 0 < ω < |m|/l, it analyzes the high-frequency regime and obtains Eq. (38), where the dual object is a spinless BTZ black hole with M' > 0 and r_+ = l√M'. The paper interprets this as the noncommutative dressing of the naked singularity, and then computes entropy, quasi-normal modes, CFT temperatures, and a quantum-completeness bound (48). It concludes that weak cosmic censorship is enforced by high-energy noncommutative probes, and notes a byproduct light scalar.

Significance. If the result were physically correct, it would be a significant and interesting mechanism: a Planck-scale noncommutative probe in 2+1 AdS would dress a naked singularity into a BTZ black hole with standard thermodynamics and holographic QNMs. The explicit frequency window (34), the exclusion of low frequencies, and the mapping to a commutative massive scalar are cleanly presented and provide a concrete target for further analysis. The strengths are the self-contained algebraic derivation of the allowed window and the honest statement of the fixed-background setting. However, the physical conclusion depends entirely on identifying the auxiliary dual metric (19) with the actual dressed geometry, and the manuscript itself states assumptions (δ_a g_μν = 0; no backreaction) that contradict that identification. The significance is therefore conditional; as it stands, the paper establishes a mathematical equivalence between two scattering problems, not a violation or restoration of cosmic censorship.

major comments (3)
  1. [II.B, III (Eqs. (6), (19), (38); V)] The central claim that the NC probe 'dresses' the naked singularity as a BTZ black hole is not supported by the formalism. Section II.B fixes the setup as a noncommutative scalar on a classical background and states δ_a g_μν = 0; Section V states that backreaction effects of the test particles were not considered. Under these assumptions the physical metric remains (6) with M = -|M|, whose g^{rr} = r²/l² + |M| is positive for all r > 0, so no horizon exists at any frequency. The duality in Section III is an equivalence between the radial equation (11) and the radial equation for a massive scalar in the auxiliary metric (19); it is a re-parameterization of the wave equation, not a change of the gravitational field. Consequently Eq. (38) defines the parameters of an auxiliary spacetime, and the statement that the singularity is 'dressed' by an actual horizon exceeds what the calculation shows. The sentence after Eq. (17) claiming that the scalar induces back-reaction effects through changes in M and J is in direct tension with the fixed-background assumption. To make the censorship claim physical, the authors would need a backreaction calculation showing that the stress-energy of the NC scalar modifies the metric so that a horizon forms; this is absent. This issue is load-bearing because the title and conclusions rest on it.
  2. [III and V] The paper does not prove the dressed-black-hole claim for the intermediate frequency range that its own conclusion relies on. It shows that for 0 < ω < |m|/l the inequalities (26) cannot be satisfied, and it gives asymptotic expansions (33) valid for α = lω/|m| ≫ 1 leading to the window (34). The final remarks then assert that 'for intermediate energies the naked singularity is dressed as a massive spinning BTZ black hole,' but no analysis of (26) is given for generic |m|/l < ω below the asymptotic regime. Since f and g in (23)-(24) are rational functions of ω and m, whether f - |g|/l stays above 1/|M| needs to be checked; this is a concrete, fillable gap, but it is load-bearing for the claim that only very low-energy probes fail to dress.
  3. [III (Eqs. (13), (22), (38))] There is a circularity in the identification of the dressed geometry. Equations (13)/(22) for M' and J' are derived by demanding that the NC radial equation (11) be recast as a commutative massive-scalar equation in a BTZ metric (19); the mass and spin of the 'dressed' object are therefore fixed by the duality ansatz, not by any independent dynamical input. It is then not surprising that the dressed singularity is 'geometrically equivalent' to a BTZ black hole: the comparison class was restricted to BTZ metrics from the start. This is closely related to the first major comment, but it matters for how the result should be read even if one regards the dual metric as an effective description.
minor comments (3)
  1. [IV.A, Eq. (39)] In the stated units 8πG = 1, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of a BTZ black hole is S = A/(4G) = 4π²r_+, not πr_+/2 as written. The numerical factor in Eq. (39) should be corrected, and the same factor propagates into Eq. (40).
  2. [Various (Introduction, Section IV.B)] There are several typographical errors: 'sme aring' in the Introduction, 'Sullivann's theorem' in Section IV.B, and 'CFT's' for 'CFTs'. Please proofread.
  3. [II.A/II.B] The sign convention L_NC = -aβ > 0 is assumed without discussion; since β is a representation parameter that can have either sign, the paper should state the physical constraints that fix this sign.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Dressing is definitional: the horizon is assigned to the auxiliary dual metric (19) while the actual metric stays fixed with δ_a g=0; the BTZ conclusion is the imported duality itself.

  1. self definitional [Section III, Eqs. (21)-(38); compare Section II.B, Eq. (19) and δ_a g_μν=0]
    "Now we see that even though the initial mass may be negative ( M < 0), the singularities in the effective metric (19) will be surrounded by horizon(s) if the conditions M ′ > 0 and |J ′| ≤ M ′l are fulfilled. ... A NC probe with frequency in this range will dress up a naked singularit y of mass −|M | as a black hole with the parameters M ′ = |M | [ 4LN C|M | l2ω − 1 ] J ′ = 0, r + = l √ M ′, and r− = 0, (38), whose metric would be given by (19)."

    The horizon is asserted for the effective/dual metric (19), not for the actual physical metric (6). Section II.B fixed the background as classical with δ_a g_μν=0, and Section V disclaims backreaction, so the original M=-|M| spacetime has g^rr = r^2/l^2 + |M| > 0 everywhere and no horizon is produced by the probe. The dual metric was constructed to be a BTZ metric when matching the radial equations, so 'the dressed singularity is BTZ' is the definition of the dual picture, not a derived property of the gravitational field. The inequalities (26), (34) and Eq. (38) only parametrize that auxiliary metric; the physical claim that weak cosmic censorship is enforced reduces to the choice to identify the auxiliary metric with the dressed geometry.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section II.B (Eqs. (13), (18)-(19)); Section V final remarks]
    "Using a by now well established notion of noncommutative duality [54–57], we have shown that a naked singularity in our toy model will generically be hidden under event horizon(s), pr ovided that the probe frequency ω does not belong to the range 0 < ω < |m|/l. ... The dual black hole parameters were calculated in [56]."

    The entire load-bearing content of the 'dressing'—the equivalence between the NC massless scalar on a J=0 BTZ background and a massive commutative scalar on a spinning BTZ background, plus the formulas (13) for M' and J'—is imported from [54-57], whose author sets overlap with the present paper. The paper does not rederive or independently validate this duality; it uses it to define the effective metric (19) and then reads off horizons. The physical step of promoting this mathematical equivalence to a gravitational dressing is therefore carried by a self-citation chain. The subsequently derived inequalities (26) and (34) are new algebra, but they do not supply the missing physical input that would make the auxiliary metric the actual dressed geometry.

full rationale

The algebraic core of the paper is not circular: given the duality quoted from [54-57], the expressions for f and g, the positivity P≥0, the frequency window (34), and the resulting parameters (38) follow by straightforward algebra, with no fitted data. The entropy (40) and QNM formulas (43)-(44) are likewise standard consequences once a BTZ geometry is assumed. However, the central physical claim—that a naked singularity is dressed into a BTZ black hole, thereby enforcing weak cosmic censorship—reduces by construction to the identification of the dual/effective metric (19) with the actual dressed geometry. The paper's own setup fixes δ_a g_μν=0 and explicitly disclaims backreaction effects, so the original metric (6) with M=-|M| remains horizonless; only the re-parameterized wave equation sees the auxiliary BTZ horizon. Thus the BTZ nature of the 'dressed singularity' is an input of the dual mapping, not a derived outcome, making the headline result partially circular. The self-citations [54-57] are load-bearing for this identification, though they do contain the algebraic derivation of the duality. Overall score 6: one or more central 'predictions' reduce by construction, while the new inequalities and parameter windows retain independent algebraic content.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new fundamental fields or forces are introduced. The light scalar is the original probe with an emergent mass (17) in the dual description; the dressed singularity is a reinterpretation of the known BTZ geometry, not a new entity.

free parameters (1)
  • L_NC = -a beta = unspecified; constrained by inequalities (34) and (48)
    The positive combination of the deformation parameter a and representation parameter beta controls all dressing effects; its value (usually taken Planck scale) is not fixed by any independent measurement.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption kappa-Minkowski star product expanded to first order in a gives the field equation (8) with only the beta-term contributing
    The paper relies on the star product (7) and the claim that beta-prime and bar-beta terms drop out, drawn from refs [54-57]; this underpins the radial equation (9).
  • domain assumption The duality mapping (13)-(17) between a NC massless scalar on J=0 BTZ and a massive scalar on a rotating BTZ
    Taken from ref [56] by the same authors; the entire construction of M', J', and mu' uses this mapping without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption The background metric is unaffected by noncommutativity (delta_a g_mu_nu = 0)
    Section II.B states gravity is classical; this makes the later identification of the dual metric as a dressed physical spacetime problematic.
  • domain assumption M' > 0 and |J'| <= M' l are necessary and sufficient for a BTZ black hole with horizons
    Standard BTZ parameter range; used in Eq. (25) to define dressing.
  • domain assumption The quantum-completeness condition (45) from refs [53,73] applies to the dressed geometry
    Used without derivation in Section IV.C to obtain the bound (48).
  • domain assumption BTZ QNM frequencies (41) and temperatures (42) from ref [62] apply to the dressed singularity
    Standard known results from the literature; the paper applies them to the dual black hole.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Noncommutativity and the Weak Cosmic Censorship." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ECONSIW7

@misc{pith2026190807402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Noncommutativity and the Weak Cosmic Censorship},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ECONSIW7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07402}
}
abstract

We show that a noncommutative massless scalar probe can dress a naked singularity in $AdS_3$ spacetime, consistent with the weak cosmic censorship. The dressing occurs at high energies, which is typical at the Planck scale. Using a noncommutative duality, we show that the dressed singularity has the geometry of a rotating BTZ black hole which satisfies all the laws of black hole thermodynamics. We calculate the entropy and the quasi-normal modes of the dressed singularity and show that the corresponding spacetime can be quantum mechanically complete. The noncommutative duality also gives rise to a light scalar, which can be relevant for early universe cosmology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hawking, R

    S.W. Hawking, R. Penrose, The singularities of gravitat ional collapse and cosmology, Proceedings of the Royal Soci ety London A, 314, 529 (1970)

    1970

  2. [2]

    Gravitational collapse: The role of genera l relativity,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse: The role of genera l relativity,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1 (1969) 252 [Gen. Rel. Grav. 34 (2002) 1141]

    work page 1969

  3. [3]

    Singularities and time-asymmetry,

    R. Penrose, “Singularities and time-asymmetry,” Gener al Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. S.W.Hawking, W. Israel, eds. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1979, p.581-638

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    The question of cosmic censorship,

    R. Penrose, “The question of cosmic censorship,” J. Astr ophys. Astron. 20 (1999) 233

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    The singularities of gravita tional collapse and cosmology,

    S.W. Hawking, R. Penrose, “The singularities of gravita tional collapse and cosmology,” Proceedings of the Royal So ciety London A, 314, 529 (1970)

    work page 1970

  6. [6]

    Mathemati cal structure of loop quantum cosmology,

    A. Ashtekar, M. Bojowald and J. Lewandowski, “Mathemati cal structure of loop quantum cosmology,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2003) no.2, 233, [gr-qc/0304074]

    arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    Quantum geometry and the Sc hwarzschild singularity,

    A. Ashtekar and M. Bojowald, “Quantum geometry and the Sc hwarzschild singularity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 391, [gr-qc/0509075]

    arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Quantum geometry and its implications for black holes,

    M. Bojowald, “Quantum geometry and its implications for black holes,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1545 [gr- qc/0607130]

    work page arXiv 2006

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Von-Neumann Stabilit y and Singularity Resolution in Loop Quantized Schwarzschi ld Black Hole,

    A. Yonika, G. Khanna and P. Singh, “Von-Neumann Stabilit y and Singularity Resolution in Loop Quantized Schwarzschi ld Black Hole,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, no. 4 (2018) 045007 [arXiv:1709.06331 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Geodesic completeness and the la ck of strong singularities in effective loop quantum Kantows kiSachs spacetime,

    S. Saini and P. Singh, “Geodesic completeness and the la ck of strong singularities in effective loop quantum Kantows kiSachs spacetime,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33, no. 24 (2016) 245019, [arXiv:1606.04932 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    String theory and cosmological singular ities

    Sumit R. Das, “String theory and cosmological singular ities”, Pramana 69 (2007) 93

    2007

  4. [12]

    The fuzzball proposal for black holes : an elementary review

    Samir D. Mathur, “The fuzzball proposal for black holes : an elementary review”, Fortsch. Phys. 53 (2005) 793, hep- th/0502050

    2005

  5. [13]

    Tow ards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity

    T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto and A. Mazumdar, “Tow ards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 031101 (2012), [arXiv:1110.5249[gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Resolving spacet ime singularities with asymptotic safety

    L. Bosma, B. Knorr and F. Saueressig, “Resolving spacet ime singularities with asymptotic safety”, [arXiv:1904.0 4845[hep- th]]

    1904

  7. [15]

    Nonlocal (but also nonsing ular) physics at the last stages of gravitational collapse,

    A. Saini and D. Stojkovi´ c, “Nonlocal (but also nonsing ular) physics at the last stages of gravitational collapse, ” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) no.4, 044003, [arXiv:1401.6182 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Quantum gravitationa l collapse: Non-singularity and non-locality,

    E. Greenwood and D. Stojkovi´ c, “Quantum gravitationa l collapse: Non-singularity and non-locality,” JHEP 0806 (2008) 042, [arXiv:0802.4087 [gr-qc]]

    2008 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Schrodinge r formalism, black hole horizons and singularity behavior,

    J. E. Wang, E. Greenwood and D. Stojkovi´ c, “Schrodinge r formalism, black hole horizons and singularity behavior, ” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 124027, [arXiv:0906.3250 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Quantum probes of space-t ime singularities,

    G. T. Horowitz and D. Marolf, “Quantum probes of space-t ime singularities,” Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 5670, [gr-qc/9504028]

    1995 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Classical versus quantum completeness,

    S. Hofmann and M. Schneider,“Classical versus quantum completeness,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) no.12, [arXiv:1504.05580 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointn ess (Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2)

    M. Reed and B. Simon, “Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointn ess (Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2)” ( New York :Academic, 1975)

    1975

  13. [21]

    Essential self-adjointness of powers o f generators of hyperbolic equations,

    P.R. Chernoff, “Essential self-adjointness of powers o f generators of hyperbolic equations,” J. Funct. Anal. Volu me 12, Pages 401-414

  14. [22]

    Who’s afraid of naked singu larities? Probing timelike singularities with finite energ y waves,

    A. Ishibashi and A. Hosoya,“Who’s afraid of naked singu larities? Probing timelike singularities with finite energ y waves,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 104028 (1999)

    1999

  15. [23]

    Dynamics in non-globally- hyperbolic static spacetimes,

    A. Ishibashi and R.M. Wald, “Dynamics in non-globally- hyperbolic static spacetimes,” Classical and Quantum Grav ity 11 20, 3815 (2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    Quant um singularity of Levi-Civita spacetimes,

    D.A. Konkowski, T.M. Helliwell, and C. Wieland, “Quant um singularity of Levi-Civita spacetimes,” Classical and Q uantum Gravity 21, 265 (2004)

    2004

  17. [25]

    Note on the stability of the Schwarzschild m etric,

    R.M. Wald, “Note on the stability of the Schwarzschild m etric,”Journal of Mathematical Physics 20 (1978). “Dynamics in nonglobally hyperbolic, static spacetimes,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 21 (1980)

    1978

  18. [26]

    Understanding sin gularities Classical and quantum,

    D. A. Konkowski and T. M. Helliwell, “Understanding sin gularities Classical and quantum,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (2016) no.02n03, 1641007

    2016

  19. [27]

    Banados, C

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Let t. 69 (1992) 1849

    1992

  20. [28]

    Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,

    M. Banados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, “ Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 48, 1506 (1993) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 88, 069902 (2013)], [gr-qc/9302012]

    1993 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Backreaction of a conforma l field on a three-dimensional black hole,

    C. Martinez and J. Zanelli, “Backreaction of a conforma l field on a three-dimensional black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 3642

    1997

  22. [30]

    Quantu m dress for a naked singularity,

    M. Casals, A. Fabbri, C. Martnez and J. Zanelli, “Quantu m dress for a naked singularity,” Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 244, [arXiv:1605.06078 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Quantu m Backreaction on Three-Dimensional Black Holes and Naked Singularities,

    M. Casals, A. Fabbri, C. Martnez and J. Zanelli, “Quantu m Backreaction on Three-Dimensional Black Holes and Naked Singularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, no. 13 (2017) 131102, [arXiv:1608.05366 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gravitational perturbatio n of the BTZ black hole induced by test particles and weak cosm ic censorship in AdS spacetime,

    J. V. Rocha and V. Cardoso, “Gravitational perturbatio n of the BTZ black hole induced by test particles and weak cosm ic censorship in AdS spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 104037, [arXiv:1102.4352 [gr-qc]]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Arkani-Hamed, L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, The St ring landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force , J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2007) 060

    2007

  26. [34]

    Testing th e Weak Gravity - Cosmic Censorship Connection,

    T. Crisford, G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos, “Testing th e Weak Gravity - Cosmic Censorship Connection,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.6, 066005, [arXiv:1709.07880 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Further evidence for th e weak gravity cosmic censorship connection,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos, “Further evidence for th e weak gravity cosmic censorship connection,” JHEP 1906 (2019) 122, [arXiv:1901.11096 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. V. Ahluwalia, Phys. Lett. B 339 (1994) 301

    1994

  29. [37]

    Doplicher, K

    S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, Phys. Le tt. B 331 (1994) 39

    1994

  30. [38]

    Doplicher, K

    S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, Comm. Ma th. Phys. Volume 172, Number 1 (1995), 187-220

    1995

  31. [39]

    Noncommutative de Sitter and FR W spaces

    M. Buric and J. Madore, “Noncommutative de Sitter and FR W spaces”, Eur. Phys. J. C. 10 75 (2015), [arXiv:1508.06058[hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Discrete fuzzy de Sitter cosmolo gy

    M. Buric and D. Latas, “Discrete fuzzy de Sitter cosmolo gy”, Phys. Rev. D100, 024053 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Q d eformation of Poincare algebra,

    J. Lukierski, H. Ruegg, A. Nowicki and V. N. Tolstoi, “Q d eformation of Poincare algebra,” Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 331

    1991

  34. [42]

    Quantum kappa Poincare in an y dimension,

    J. Lukierski and H. Ruegg, “Quantum kappa Poincare in an y dimension,” Phys. Lett. B 329 (1994) 189. [hep-th/9310117]

    1994 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bicrossproduct structure of kap pa Poincare group and noncommutative geometry,

    S. Majid and H. Ruegg, “Bicrossproduct structure of kap pa Poincare group and noncommutative geometry,” Phys. Lett . B 334 (1994) 348. [hep-th/9405107]

    1994 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Exact black hole solution s in noncommutatibe gravity

    P. Schupp and S. Solodukhin, “Exact black hole solution s in noncommutatibe gravity”, [arXiv:0906.2724[hep-th]]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Noncommutative BT Z black hole and discrete time,

    B. P. Dolan, K. S. Gupta and A. Stern, “Noncommutative BT Z black hole and discrete time,” Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 1647 (2007) [hep-th/0611233]

    2007 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Noncommutativity and quantum structure of spacetime,

    B. P. Dolan, K. S. Gupta and A. Stern, “Noncommutativity and quantum structure of spacetime,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 174, 012023 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Cosmological and Black Hole Spa cetimes in Twisted Noncommutative Gravity

    T. Ohl and A. Schenkel, “Cosmological and Black Hole Spa cetimes in Twisted Noncommutative Gravity” JHEP 0910, 052 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Quantum singularit ies in the BTZ spacetime,

    J. P. M. Pitelli and P. S. Letelier, “Quantum singularit ies in the BTZ spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 124030 (2008), [arXiv:0805.3926 [gr-qc]]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Early universe models fr om noncommutative geometry,

    M. Marcolli and E. Pierpaoli, “Early universe models fr om noncommutative geometry,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14, (2010) 1373 [arXiv:0908.3683 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Nonco mmutative inflation

    S. Alexander, R. Brandenberger and J. Magueijo, “Nonco mmutative inflation”, Phys. Rev. D 67, 081301 (R) (2003) [arXiv: hep-th/0108190]

    2003 arXiv

  43. [51]

    CMB statistics in noncomm utative inflation

    T. S. Koivisto and D. F. Mota, “CMB statistics in noncomm utative inflation”, JHEP 02, (2011) 061 [arXiv: 1011.2126 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2011 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Quintessence A Review

    S. Tsujikawa, “Quintessence A Review”, Class. Quant. G rav. 30, 214003 (2013) [arXiv : 1304.1961 [gr-qc]]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Quantum space and quantum completeness,

    T. Juri´ c, “Quantum space and quantum completeness,” J HEP 1805 (2018) 007 [arXiv:1802.09873 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Effects of Noncommutativity on the Black Hole Entropy,

    K. S. Gupta, E. Harikumar, T. Juri´ c, S. Meljanac and A. S amsarov, “Effects of Noncommutativity on the Black Hole Entropy,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014 (2014) 139172, [arXiv:1312.5100 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Noncommutative scalar quasinormal modes and quantization of entropy of a BTZ black hole,

    K. S. Gupta, E. Harikumar, T. Juri´ c, S. Meljanac and A. S amsarov, “Noncommutative scalar quasinormal modes and quantization of entropy of a BTZ black hole,” JHEP 1509 (2015) 025, [arXiv:1505.04068 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Entanglement entropy renormalization for the noncommutative scalar field coupled to cl assical BTZ geometry,

    T. Juri´ c and A. Samsarov, “Entanglement entropy renormalization for the noncommutative scalar field coupled to cl assical BTZ geometry,” Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) no.10, 104033, [arXiv:1602.01488 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Noncommutative duality and fermionic quasinormal modes of the BTZ black hole,

    K. S. Gupta, T. Juri´ c and A. Samsarov, “Noncommutative duality and fermionic quasinormal modes of the BTZ black hole,” JHEP 1706 (2017) 107, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2017)107 [arXiv:1703.00 514 [hep-th]]

    2017 doi

  50. [58]

    Kap pa-Minkowski space-time and the star product realizations ,

    S. Meljanac, A. Samsarov, M. Stojic and K. S. Gupta,“Kap pa-Minkowski space-time and the star product realizations ,” Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2008) 295. [arXiv:0705.2471 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Twisted statistics in kappa-Minkowski spacetime,

    T. R. Govindarajan, K. S. Gupta, E. Harikumar, S. Meljan ac and D. Meljanac, “Twisted statistics in kappa-Minkowski spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 105010, [arXiv:0802.1576 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Twists, realizat ions and Hopf algebroid structure of kappa-deformed phase s pace,

    T. Juri´ c, S. Meljanac and R. Strajn, “Twists, realizat ions and Hopf algebroid structure of kappa-deformed phase s pace,” 12 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) no.5, 1450022, [arXiv:1305.3088 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Realizations of κ-Minkowski space, Drinfeld twists and related symmetry alg ebras,

    T. Juri´ c, S. Meljanac and D. Pikuti´ c, “Realizations of κ-Minkowski space, Drinfeld twists and related symmetry alg ebras,” Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) no.11, 528 [arXiv:1506.04955 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Choptuik scaling and quasinormal mode s in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    D. Birmingham, “Choptuik scaling and quasinormal mode s in the AdS / CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064024, [hep-th/0101194]

    2001 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Entropy of the BTZ black hole in (2+1)-dimensions,

    S. W. Kim, W. T. Kim, Y. J. Park and H. Shin, “Entropy of the BTZ black hole in (2+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 392, 311 (1997), [hep-th/9603043]

    1997 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Thermodynamics of BTZ black h ole and entanglement entropy,

    D. V. Singh and S. Siwach, “Thermodynamics of BTZ black h ole and entanglement entropy,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 481, 012014 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    Scalar, electromagnetic and Weyl perturbations of BTZ black holes: Quasinormal mode s,

    V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, “Scalar, electromagnetic and Weyl perturbations of BTZ black holes: Quasinormal mode s,” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 124015, [gr-qc/0101052]

    2001 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Conforma l field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal mode s,

    D. Birmingham, I. Sachs and S. N. Solodukhin, “Conforma l field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal mode s,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 151301, [hep-th/0112055]

    2002 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Sullivan, in Proceedings of the 1978 Stony Brook Conference on Riemann Su rfaces and Related Topics , edited by I

    D. Sullivan, in Proceedings of the 1978 Stony Brook Conference on Riemann Su rfaces and Related Topics , edited by I. Kra and B. Maskit, Annals of Mathematics Studies No. 97, Prin ceton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1981; C. McMullen, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 27, (1992)...

    1992

  60. [68]

    Birmingham, C

    D. Birmingham, C. Kennedy, S. Sen and A. Wilkins, Phys. R ev. Lett. 82, (1999) 4164; D. Birmingham, I. Sachs, S. Sen, Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. D10, (2001) 833

    1999

  61. [69]

    Gupta and Siddhartha Sen Geometric finiteness and non-quasinormal modes of the BTZ bl ack hole , Phys.Lett

    Kumar S. Gupta and Siddhartha Sen Geometric finiteness and non-quasinormal modes of the BTZ bl ack hole , Phys.Lett. B618 (2005) 237

    2005

  62. [70]

    General Relativity,

    R. M. Wald, “General Relativity,” doi:10.7208/chicag o/9780226870373.001.0001

  63. [71]

    Curvature si ngularity of the distributional BTZ black hole geometry,

    N. R. Pantoja, H. Rago and R. O. Rodriguez, “Curvature si ngularity of the distributional BTZ black hole geometry,” J . Math. Phys. 45 (2004) 1994, [gr-qc/0205094]

    2004 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Quantum singularities in (2+1) dimensional matter coupled black hole spacetimes,

    O. Unver and O. Gurtug, “Quantum singularities in (2+1) dimensional matter coupled black hole spacetimes,” Phys. R ev. D 82 (2010) 084016, [arXiv:1004.2572 [gr-qc]]

    2010 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Normal mod e analysis for scalar fields in BTZ black hole background,

    S. K. Chakrabarti, P. R. Giri and K. S. Gupta, “Normal mod e analysis for scalar fields in BTZ black hole background,” Eur. Phys. J. C 60 (2009) 169, [arXiv:0807.2385 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  66. [74]

    AdS(3) black holes a nd a stringy exclusion principle

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “AdS(3) black holes a nd a stringy exclusion principle”, JHEP 9812, 005 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9804085]

    1998 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y . Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity”, Phys. Rept. 323, 183 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9905111]

    2000 arXiv

  68. [76]

    TASI lectures on black holes in string theor y

    A. W. Peet, “TASI lectures on black holes in string theor y” in Boulder 1999, Strings, branes and gravity [arXiv:hep- th/0008241]

    1999

  69. [77]

    Statistical entropy of four-d imensional rotating black holes from near-horizon geometr y

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, “Statistical entropy of four-d imensional rotating black holes from near-horizon geometr y”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 484 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9805146]

    1999 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Microscopic derivation o f the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for nonextremal b lack holes

    K. Sfetsos and K. Skenderis, “Microscopic derivation o f the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for nonextremal b lack holes”, Nucl. Phys. B 517 , 179 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9711138]

    1998 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Noncommutative scalar q uasinormal modes of the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole,

    M. D. ´Ciri´ c, N. Konjik and A. Samsarov, “Noncommutative scalar q uasinormal modes of the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) no.17, 175005, [arXiv:1708.04066 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Noncommutative scalar fi eld in the non-extremal Reissner-Nordstr¨ om back- ground: QNM spectrum,

    M. D. ´Ciri´ c, N. Konjik and A. Samsarov, “Noncommutative scalar fi eld in the non-extremal Reissner-Nordstr¨ om back- ground: QNM spectrum,” arXiv:1904.04053 [hep-th]

    1904 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Some physical aspects of NC Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole

    Juri´ c, Samsarov, Smoli´ c, Dimitrijevi´ c, Konjik, “Some physical aspects of NC Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole”in preparation

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.