Warped Schwarzian theory

Hamid R. Afshar

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Warped Schwarzian theory

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The warped Schwarzian theory has a one-loop-exact partition function, and its $\kappa$-cocycle produces a nonzero mixed energy–charge correlator.

desk verdict A new and mostly solid warped Schwarzian model; the k=0 quotient issue flagged in the stress-test is a notation problem, not a mathematical one. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08089 v3 pith:GQ6WMEHN submitted 2019-08-21 hep-th

Hamid R. Afshar This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords warpedVirasorogroupcoadjointorbitsSchwarziantheoryone-loopexactpathintegralDuistermaat-HeckmantheoremcomplexSYKmodelconformalfieldKirillov-Kostant-Souriausymplecticform

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a one-dimensional Euclidean quantum theory, the warped Schwarzian theory, from the coadjoint orbits of the twisted warped Virasoro group, the semidirect product of circle diffeomorphisms with functions on the circle. The central claim is that the path integral is one-loop exact and evaluates to $Z(\beta,\alpha) \propto \beta^{-2}\exp\!\left(\frac{c\pi^2}{6\beta}+2\pi i\alpha\kappa-\frac{k\beta}{4}\alpha^2\right)$, where $c,\kappa,k$ are the three cocycles and $\alpha$ is related to a chemical potential. If true, this gives an exactly solvable effective theory for reparametrizations with an extra $U(1)$ direction, generalizing the ordinary Schwarzian theory and its connection to the complex SYK model. The $\kappa$-cocycle produces a nonzero mixed energy--charge correlator $\langle E(\tau)Q(0)\rangle=-2\pi\kappa/\beta^2$, a feature absent in the untwisted case. The payoff would be an exactly solvable low-energy theory that links reparametrization dynamics to a twisted version of the complex SYK model.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coadjoint orbit of the twisted warped Virasoro group, the semidirect product $\mathrm{Diff}(S^1)\ltimes C^\infty(S^1)$ with three central cocycles $(c,\kappa,k)$, together with the Kirillov--Kostant--Souriau symplectic 2-form $\omega$ on that orbit, written in (3.8) as $\omega=-\frac{c}{24}\int_{S^1}\left[\frac{df'\wedge df''}{f'^2}-\frac{4\pi^2}{\beta^2}df\wedge df'\right]+\kappa\int_{S^1} d\log\!\left(e^{2\pi i f/\beta}\right)'\wedge d\tilde{g}'-\frac{k}{4}\int_{S^1} d\tilde{g}\wedge d\tilde{g}'$. The Pfaffian of $\omega$ supplies the measure in the path integral, and the Duistermaat--Heckman theorem is invoked to argue that the integral localizes to the saddle point, making the one-loop answer exact. When $k\neq 0$, the form can be diagonalized by the shifts $g\to g_{\rm eff}=g+\alpha_{\rm eff}f-\frac{2\kappa}{k}\log f'$ and $c\to c_{\rm eff}=c-\frac{24\kappa^2}{k}$, which absorbs the $\kappa$-cocycle into an effective central charge and chemical potential; this is what turns the action into an ordinary Schwarzian term plus a free scalar. The genuinely new contribution is the off-diagonal $\kappa$ term, which cannot be removed when $k=0$, where the stabilizer becomes $iso(1,1)$.

What would settle it

A direct two-loop evaluation around the $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times U(1)$ saddle would settle the claim: if the two-loop contribution does not vanish identically, the one-loop-exact partition function (5.25) is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the coadjoint orbit of the warped Virasoro group with stabilizer $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times U(1)$, the Euclidean action $S=\int_0^\beta T(\tau)\,d\tau$ decomposes into three terms, one for each cocycle. Using the Pfaffian of the Kirillov--Kostant--Souriau symplectic form as the path-integral measure, the author shows the one-loop result is exact and obtains $Z(\beta,\alpha) \propto \beta^{-2}\exp\!\left(\frac{c\pi^2}{6\beta}+2\pi i\alpha\kappa-\frac{k\beta}{4}\alpha^2\right)$ (equation (5.25)). The same computation yields correlators $\langle E(\tau)E(0)\rangle=\pi^2 c/(3\beta^3)$, $\langle E(\tau)Q(0)\rangle=-2\pi\kappa/\beta^2$, and $\langle Q(\tau)Q(0)\rangle=k/(2\beta)$, with the mixed correlator nonzero only when $\kappa\neq 0$. The paper further derives the density of states by inverse Laplace transform, obtaining $\rho\sim e^{2\sqrt{cE/6}}/E^{1/4}$ at high energy, and compares the thermodynamics to the complex SYK model, identifying $c\to 3\gamma N/\pi^2$ and $k\to 2NK$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the infinite-dimensional path integral over the space of reparametrizations and translations localizes exactly to its saddle point, with the natural symplectic volume as the measure; if higher-loop terms do not cancel, the clean $\beta^{-2}$ result fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The partition function (5.25) is one-loop exact, making the warped Schwarzian theory an exactly solvable model of reparametrization dynamics with a $U(1)$ twist.
For $k<0$ the density of states grows as $\rho(E)\sim e^{2\sqrt{cE/6}}/E^{1/4}$ at large energy and linearly in $E$ just above the ground state, generalizing the Schwarzian density of states.
The $\kappa$-cocycle generates a nonzero mixed correlator $\langle E(\tau)Q(0)\rangle=-2\pi\kappa/\beta^2$ between energy and $U(1)$ charge, a feature not present in the complex SYK model at $\kappa=0$.
The correspondence with the complex SYK model maps $c\to 3\gamma N/\pi^2$ and $k\to 2NK$, identifying the warped Schwarzian thermodynamics with heat capacity $\gamma$ and compressibility $K$.
For $k=0$ the stabilizer is $iso(1,1)$ instead of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times U(1)$, and the same $\beta^{-2}$ form of the partition function survives after the corresponding zero modes are excluded manually.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the same orbit-method construction should apply to other central extensions or deformations of the Virasoro group, producing a family of one-loop-exact 'deformed Schwarzian' theories with modified densities of states.
Editorial inference: because the effective chemical potential $\alpha_{\rm eff}=\alpha-\frac{2\kappa}{k}\frac{2\pi i}{\beta}$ depends on $\beta$, the $\kappa$-cocycle acts as a temperature-dependent charge source; at low temperature it may dominate over the level-$k$ term and change the phase structure.
Editorial inference: a direct two-loop computation around the same saddle would test the localization assumption; if a nonvanishing two-loop contribution appears, the $\beta^{-2}$ prefactor would be corrected and the comparison with complex SYK would need adjustment.
Editorial inference: the $\sigma_{\rm eff}$ shift in section 5.3 violates the holomorphicity assumed in the mode expansion, so the $k\neq 0$, $\kappa\neq 0$ case may require a more careful treatment of the measure; the paper's own return to old variables leaves this as an open consistency check.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing you should know: this is new and mostly solid. The author constructs the warped Schwarzian theory from coadjoint orbits of the twisted warped Virasoro group, and the off-diagonal κ term in the KKS form, the one-loop partition function with three cocycles, and the mixed correlator = -2πκ/β^2 are not in the prior literature. That is a real extension of the Schwarzian/SYK story, not a repackaging.

What works: for k≠0 the action reduces to a Schwarzian plus a free scalar with shifted c_eff and α_eff, the saddle equations are solved, and the one-loop determinant gives the β^{-2} scaling you expect from four zero modes. The κ=0 limit reproduces the known complex SYK effective theory. The derivation is honest, and the self-citation [27] is background group theory, not a circular load-bearing reference.

The stress-test worry about k=0 does not land. Section 3.1 identifies the degenerate directions as ǫ_1 and σ̃_{-1} (plus constants). The mode integral that gets flagged, I_{1,-1}, is over ǫ_{-1} and σ̃_1, the complementary pair. So the localization is being performed on the right quotient. What is real is a presentation problem: equation (5.2) still writes the quotient as SL(2,R)×U(1) although the k=0 stabilizer is iso(1,1). That should be fixed in revision, and a referee should ask for it.

Minor caveats: the zeta-regularized product evaluations in (5.17) and (5.23) are too compressed and contain what look like typos; the final β^{-2} is robust, but the intermediate steps need cleaning. The σ_eff shift in section 5.3 violates holomorphicity; the author flags it and works in old variables. The density of states requires k<0, which limits the comparison with complex SYK (where k>0), but the correlator results do not depend on that sign. The one-loop-exact step relies on Duistermaat-Heckman for an infinite-dimensional orbit, which is a heuristic, but it is the same heuristic used by Stanford and Witten in [9], so it is acceptable at this level.

Bottom line: this is a paper for people working on SYK, warped CFTs, and coadjoint orbit methods. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to peer review and cite it for the κ-cocycle term.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the 'warped Schwarzian theory' for the twisted warped Virasoro group Diff(S1)⋉C∞(S1) with its three central cocycles (c, κ, k). It computes the Kirillov–Kostant–Souriau symplectic form on the coadjoint orbits (Section 3), identifies the orbit stabilizers in the three cases κ=0, k=0, and κ,k≠0 (Section 3.1), and writes the Euclidean action as the L0 Hamiltonian on the orbit (Section 4). The partition function is evaluated as a one-loop-exact path integral using the Pfaffian of the symplectic form (Section 5), yielding Z(β,α) ∝ β^{−2} exp(cπ²/(6β) + 2πiακ − kβ α²/4) in (5.25), including a separate treatment of the k=0 twisted case in §5.2. The paper also computes the energy and charge correlators (6.6), finding a nonzero mixed correlator ⟨E(τ)Q(0)⟩ = −2πκ/β², and discusses the density of states and the comparison with the complex SYK model.

Significance. If correct, the result provides a solvable, parameter-free effective theory for the warped Virasoro orbit and extends the coadjoint-orbit approach to Schwarzian theories to a setting with three cocycles. The technical core — the KKS form (3.8) with the new κ off-diagonal term, the Pfaffian computations (3.18)–(3.21), and the one-loop evaluation — is explicit and checkable. The concrete predictions (the β^{−2} prefactor, the κ-dependent exponent, the mixed correlator (6.6), and the density of states (5.28)) are falsifiable within the model. The main caveat is the standard assumption that Duistermaat–Heckman localization applies to the infinite-dimensional coadjoint orbit; this is not proven here but is consistent with the Schwarzian literature. The k=0 sector, however, requires the consistency repair described in the major comment.

major comments (1)

[§5.2, Eq. (5.2), and §3.1, Eqs. (3.19)–(3.20)] The phase space is stated generically in (5.2) as Diff(S1)⋉C∞(S1)/(SL(2,R)×U(1)), but for k=0 the stabilizer is iso(1,1), as stated in §3.1. The mode set used in the k=0 path integral (5.17) — excluding ε0, ε1, σ~0, σ~−1 and integrating ε−1, σ~1 — is that of the iso(1,1) quotient, not the SL(2,R)×U(1) quotient advertised in (5.2). Please update (5.2) for the k=0 case and reconcile the zero-mode basis with the σ~ variables when α≠0; the kernel of the symplectic form (3.19) is spanned by ε0, ε1, σ~0, σ~−1, while the text lists σ−1 and σ0. As written, the Duistermaat–Heckman localization and the β^{−2} prefactor for the k=0 sector are not explicitly tied to a non-degenerate symplectic manifold, and this needs to be fixed for the derivation to be complete.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (5.26)] The factorization ZWSch(β,μ) = ZSch(β)√β exp(2πμκ + kμ²β/4) is inconsistent with (5.25) and with the convolution in (5.27); the Laplace transform of the kernel 1/√E gives an extra 1/√β, so the factor should be 1/√β (or ZSch should be defined accordingly).
[Eq. (5.17)] The displayed intermediate calculation '= β²/16π β³ = 8π/β²' is not arithmetically consistent; the zeta-regularized product over n≥2 is 16π/β³, which together with I1,−1 = −β/2 gives −8π/β² up to an irrelevant overall sign. Please correct the displayed line.
[Eq. (5.23)] After integrating out εn, the Gaussian exponent for the remaining field is written with |σn|²; the integration variable is σ~n, so the subscript should be σ~n throughout that line.
[§3.1 and §5.2] Please define explicitly the zero-mode notation ε0,1 and σ−1,0; for a nonzero twist α, the zero modes of (3.19) are linear combinations of σn and εn (specifically σ~−1 = σ−1 + αε−1), so the statement in terms of original variables is ambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the partition function and correlators are computed from explicitly stated cocycle inputs and the coadjoint-orbit action, with no fitted parameter or self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the required sense. The paper fixes the three cocycles (c, κ, k) as Lie-algebra data and determines the vacuum representative (2.21) by requiring SL(2,R)×U(1) invariance; no quantity appearing in the final results (5.25) or (6.6) is used to fix those data. The Euclidean action (4.2) is explicitly S = ∫_0^β T(τ) dτ, and the quadratic action (5.5)/(5.8) is obtained by expanding the same T. The one-loop path integral is then evaluated with the Pfaffian of the KKS form (3.18), (3.20), or (3.21) and ordinary Gaussian/zeta-function products; for example, Z^{(c)} and Z^{(k)} in (5.9)–(5.12) determine the β^{-2} prefactor, and the exponential in (5.25) is exactly the saddle-point action (5.4). Thus the asserted 'predictions' are computed consequences, not inputs. Self-citations do not carry the argument: [27] is used to recall the coadjoint action and to name the iso(1,1) zero modes, but the Pfaffian non-degeneracy analysis in §3.1 is performed in this paper, and the zero-mode set follows from the displayed sums in (3.19). The correlators in §6 use known complex-SYK results [7,8] only after the quadratic action is independently derived; the mixed correlator ⟨E(τ)Q(0)⟩ = −2πκ/β² follows from those propagators and definitions (6.1)–(6.2). No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives. A caveat: the k=0 case has a possible mathematical-consistency issue—the stabilizer stated in §3.1 is iso(1,1) while (5.2) writes the quotient as SL(2,R)×U(1)—but that is a correctness concern, not a circularity, because it does not make (5.25) equivalent to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction uses no numbers fitted to data. The inputs are the three cocycles (c, kappa, k), which are parameters of the symmetry algebra, not fit constants. The main physical assumption is that the warped Virasoro group is the correct low-energy symmetry for the complex SYK model, following [33]. The k<0 assumption for the density of states is an additional restriction stated by the author.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The relevant symmetry is the warped Virasoro group Diff(S^1) lt C^infinity(S^1) with three central extensions (c, kappa, k).
The paper takes the algebra (2.4)-(2.6) as input, following [27,33].
standard math Coadjoint orbits carry the KKS symplectic form (3.1), and the orbit method gives actions on orbits.
Standard mathematical framework, referenced to [14-17].
domain assumption The Euclidean action is the zero-mode Hamiltonian S=integral T (4.1)-(4.2).
Imported from the Schwarzian theory literature, for example [9,40], to construct the effective action.
standard math The Duistermaat-Heckman theorem applies, making the path integral one-loop exact.
Used in (5.3); requires the action to generate a U(1) action on the orbit.
ad hoc to paper For a well-defined density of states, the level k is assumed negative; k>0 is stated not to give a well-defined density.
Stated after (5.27); needed for the inverse Laplace transform to converge.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Warped Schwarzian theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GQ6WMEHN

@misc{pith2026190808089,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Warped Schwarzian theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GQ6WMEHN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08089}
}

abstract

We consider the (twisted) warped Virasoro group Diff($S^1$)$\ltimes$ C$^\infty$($S^1$) in the presence of its three cocycles. We compute the Kirillov-Kostant-Souriau symplectic 2-form on coadjoint orbits. We then construct the Euclidean action of the `warped Schwarzian theory' associated to the orbit with SL(2,$\mathbb{R}$)$\times$U(1) stabilizer as the effective theory of the reparametrization over the base circle and evaluate the corresponding one-loop-exact path integral. We further discuss thermodynamics of the wSch theory in comparison with the complex SYK model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Quantum Fluctuations and Newton-Cartan Geometry for Non-Relativistic de Sitter space
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

The one-loop partition function of the Galilean-de Sitter boundary theory is Z(β) = (2/πβ²) exp(4π²c₀/β), whose β⁻² prefactor matches the four generators of the EdS-G algebra; the matching bulk is a Newton-Cartan geom...
Tantum Gravity
hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A triple-scaling limit of quantum gravity keeps black hole thermodynamics finite and reproduces the Hawking temperature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[27]

Nea r-Horizon Geometry and Warped Conformal Symmetry,

H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, and B. Oblak, “Nea r-Horizon Geometry and Warped Conformal Symmetry,” JHEP 03 (2016) 187, 1512.08233

arXiv 2016
[9]

Fermionic Localization of th e Schwarzian Theory,

D. Stanford and E. Witten, “Fermionic Localization of th e Schwarzian Theory,” JHEP 10 (2017) 008, 1703.04612

arXiv 2017
[1]

Gapless spin ﬂuid ground state in a r andom, quantum Heisenberg magnet,

S. Sachdev and J. Ye, “Gapless spin ﬂuid ground state in a r andom, quantum Heisenberg magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339, cond-mat/9212030

arXiv 1993
[2]

A simple model of quantum holography,

A. Kitaev, “A simple model of quantum holography,” Talks at KITP, April and May 2015

work page 2015
[3]

The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-K itaev model and its gravity dual,

A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, “The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-K itaev model and its gravity dual,” JHEP 05 (2018) 183, 1711.08467

arXiv 2018
[4]

Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. 126B (1983) 41–45

1983
[5]

Lower Dimensional Gravity,

R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B252 (1985) 343–356

1985
[6]

Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and Strange Met als,

S. Sachdev, “Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and Strange Met als,” Phys. Rev. X5 (2015), no. 4, 041025, 1506.05111

arXiv 2015

Show all 52 references

[7]

Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: Th e Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography,

R. A. Davison, W. Fu, A. Georges, Y. Gu, K. Jensen, and S. Sa chdev, “Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: Th e Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography,” Phys. Rev. B95 (2017), no. 15, 155131, 1612.00849

2017 arXiv
[8]

Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye -Kitaev model,

J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye -Kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 10, 106002, 1604.07818

2016 arXiv
[10]

Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group,

E. Witten, “Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group,” Commun. Math. Phys. 114 (1988) 1

1988
[11]

Path Integral Quant ization of the Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group and 2D Gravity,

A. Alekseev and S. L. Shatashvili, “Path Integral Quant ization of the Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group and 2D Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B323 (1989) 719–733

1989
[12]

Conformal Invariance, the KdV Equation and Co adjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Algebra,

I. Bakas, “Conformal Invariance, the KdV Equation and Co adjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Algebra,” Nucl. Phys. B302 (1988) 189–203

1988
[13]

From Coadjoint Orbits to Scal e Invariant WZNW Type Actions and 2- D Quantum Gravity Action,

B. Rai and V. G. J. Rodgers, “From Coadjoint Orbits to Scal e Invariant WZNW Type Actions and 2- D Quantum Gravity Action,” Nucl. Phys. B341 (1990) 119–133

1990
[14]

Elements of the theory of representation s,

A. Kirillov, “Elements of the theory of representation s,” Springer, Berlin (1976)

1976
[15]

Quantization and unitary representations ,

B. Kostant, “Quantization and unitary representations ,” Lecture Notes in Math. 170 (1970)

1970
[16]

Structure des systèmes dynamiques,

J.-M. Souriau, “Structure des systèmes dynamiques,” Dunod, Paris (1970)

1970
[17]

Multivalued Functionals and Geometric al Approach for Quantization of Relativistic Particles and Strings,

P. B. Wiegmann, “Multivalued Functionals and Geometric al Approach for Quantization of Relativistic Particles and Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B323 (1989) 311–329. – 19 –

1989
[18]

A theory of reparameterizatio ns for AdS 3 gravity,

J. Cotler and K. Jensen, “A theory of reparameterizatio ns for AdS 3 gravity,” JHEP 02 (2019) 079, 1808.03263

2019 arXiv
[19]

Coadjoint orbit ac tion of Virasoro group and two-dimensional quantum gravity dual to SYK/tensor models ,

G. Mandal, P. Nayak, and S. R. Wadia, “Coadjoint orbit ac tion of Virasoro group and two-dimensional quantum gravity dual to SYK/tensor models ,” JHEP 11 (2017) 046, 1702.04266

2017 arXiv
[20]

Large coadjoint representation of viras oro-type lie algebras and diﬀerential operators on tensor-densities,

V. Ovsienko, “Large coadjoint representation of viras oro-type lie algebras and diﬀerential operators on tensor-densities,” arXiv:math-ph/0602009

arXiv
[21]

G eometric actions for three-dimensional gravity,

G. Barnich, H. A. Gonzalez, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “G eometric actions for three-dimensional gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 1, 014003, 1707.08887

2018 arXiv
[22]

Representations of lie groups and the orbit method,

M. Vergne, “Representations of lie groups and the orbit method,” in Emmy Noether in Bryn Mawr, pp. 59–101. Springer New York, 1983

1983
[23]

Kinematic space and the orb it method,

R. F. Penna and C. Zukowski, “Kinematic space and the orb it method,” JHEP 07 (2019) 045, 1812.02176

2019 arXiv
[24]

Oblak, BMS Particles in Three Dimensions

B. Oblak, BMS Particles in Three Dimensions . PhD thesis, Brussels U., 2016. 1610.08526

2016 arXiv
[25]

Notes on the BMS group in three dime nsions: I. Induced representations,

G. Barnich and B. Oblak, “Notes on the BMS group in three dime nsions: I. Induced representations,” JHEP 06 (2014) 129, 1403.5803

2014 arXiv
[26]

The Method of Coadjoint Orbits: An Algorithm for the Construction of Invariant Actions,

G. W. Delius, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and V. G. J. Rodgers, “The Method of Coadjoint Orbits: An Algorithm for the Construction of Invariant Actions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 3943–3984

1990
[28]

Chiral Scale and Confor mal Invariance in 2D Quantum Field Theory,

D. M. Hofman and A. Strominger, “Chiral Scale and Confor mal Invariance in 2D Quantum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 161601, 1107.2917

2011 arXiv
[29]

Warped Conf ormal Field Theory,

S. Detournay, T. Hartman, and D. M. Hofman, “Warped Conf ormal Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 124018, 1210.0539

2012 arXiv
[30]

The Schrodinger-Virasor o Lie group and algebra: From geometry to representation theory,

C. Roger and J. Unterberger, “The Schrodinger-Virasor o Lie group and algebra: From geometry to representation theory,” Annales Henri Poincare 7 (2006) 1477–1529, math-ph/0601050

2006 arXiv
[31]

M oduli spaces of curves and representation theory,

E. Arbarello, C. De Concini, V. G. Kac, and C. Procesi, “M oduli spaces of curves and representation theory,” Comm. Math. Phys. 117 (1988), no. 1, 1–36

1988
[32]

Representations of the twisted heisenberg- virasoro algebra at level zero,

Y. Billig, “Representations of the twisted heisenberg- virasoro algebra at level zero,” Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 46 (2003), no. 4, 529–537

2003
[33]

A note on the comp lex SYK model and warped CFTs,

P. Chaturvedi, Y. Gu, W. Song, and B. Yu, “A note on the comp lex SYK model and warped CFTs,” JHEP 12 (2018) 101, 1808.08062

2018 arXiv
[34]

Notes on the BMS group in three dime nsions: II. Coadjoint representation,

G. Barnich and B. Oblak, “Notes on the BMS group in three dime nsions: II. Coadjoint representation,” JHEP 03 (2015) 033, 1502.00010

2015 arXiv
[35]

A lie algebraic setting for miura maps rel ated to an energy dependent linear problem,

I. Marshall, “A lie algebraic setting for miura maps rel ated to an energy dependent linear problem,” Comm. Math. Phys. 133 (1990), no. 3, 509–520

1990
[36]

Extensions of Virasoro group and Virasoro algebra by modules of tensor densities on S**1,

V. Ovsienko and C. Roger, “Extensions of Virasoro group and Virasoro algebra by modules of tensor densities on S**1,” hep-th/9409067

arXiv
[37]

Unterberger and C

J. Unterberger and C. Roger, The Schrödinger-Virasoro Algebra. Springer, Berlin, 2012

2012
[38]

Correlation Functions of Warped CFT,

W. Song and J. Xu, “Correlation Functions of Warped CFT, ” JHEP 04 (2018) 067, 1706.07621. – 20 –

2018 arXiv
[39]

Bootstrapping holographic warped CFTs or: how I learned to stop worrying and tolerate negative norms,

L. Apolo and W. Song, “Bootstrapping holographic warped CFTs or: how I learned to stop worrying and tolerate negative norms,” JHEP 07 (2018) 112, 1804.10525

2018 arXiv
[40]

Solvin g the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,

T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. L. Verlinde, “Solvin g the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,” JHEP 08 (2017) 136, 1705.08408

2017 arXiv
[41]

Gapless spin-ﬂuid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet,

S. Sachdev and J. Ye, “Gapless spin-ﬂuid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (May, 1993) 3339–3342

1993
[42]

Supers ymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,

W. Fu, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, and S. Sachdev, “Supers ymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,” Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 2, 026009, 1610.08917. [Addendum: Phys. Rev.D95,no.6,069904(2017)]

2017 arXiv
[43]

A Generalization of Sachd ev-Ye-Kitaev,

D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, “A Generalization of Sachd ev-Ye-Kitaev,” JHEP 02 (2017) 093, 1610.01569

2017 arXiv
[44]

Chaotic Cor relation Functions with Complex Fermions,

R. Bhattacharya, D. P. Jatkar, and A. Kundu, “Chaotic Cor relation Functions with Complex Fermions,” 1810.13217

arXiv
[45]

A note on the SYK model with complex fermio ns,

K. Bulycheva, “A note on the SYK model with complex fermio ns,” JHEP 12 (2017) 069, 1706.07411

2017 arXiv
[46]

SYK Models and SYK-like Tensor Models with Glo bal Symmetry,

J. Yoon, “SYK Models and SYK-like Tensor Models with Glo bal Symmetry,” JHEP 10 (2017) 183, 1707.01740

2017 arXiv
[47]

Supersymmetric SYK Model with G lobal Symmetry,

P. Narayan and J. Yoon, “Supersymmetric SYK Model with G lobal Symmetry,” JHEP 08 (2018) 159, 1712.02647

2018 arXiv
[48]

Menagerie of AdS 2 boundary conditions,

D. Grumiller, R. McNees, J. Salzer, C. Valcárcel, and D. Vassilevich, “Menagerie of AdS 2 boundary conditions,” JHEP 10 (2017) 203, 1708.08471

2017 arXiv
[49]

Towards a b ulk description of higher spin SYK,

H. A. González, D. Grumiller, and J. Salzer, “Towards a b ulk description of higher spin SYK,” JHEP 05 (2018) 083, 1802.01562

2018 arXiv
[50]

Note on global symmetry and SYK model ,

J. Liu and Y. Zhou, “Note on global symmetry and SYK model ,” JHEP 05 (2019) 099, 1901.05666

2019 arXiv
[51]

Defects in Jackiw-Teit elboim Quantum Gravity,

T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, “Defects in Jackiw-Teit elboim Quantum Gravity,” 1904.05228

1904 arXiv
[52]

Flat space holography and complex SYK,

H. Afshar, H. A. González, D. Grumiller, and D. Vassilev ich, “Flat space holography and complex SYK,” 1911.05739. – 21 –

1911 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [27]

Nea r-Horizon Geometry and Warped Conformal Symmetry,

H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, and B. Oblak, “Nea r-Horizon Geometry and Warped Conformal Symmetry,” JHEP 03 (2016) 187, 1512.08233

arXiv 2016

[2] [9]

Fermionic Localization of th e Schwarzian Theory,

D. Stanford and E. Witten, “Fermionic Localization of th e Schwarzian Theory,” JHEP 10 (2017) 008, 1703.04612

arXiv 2017

[3] [1]

Gapless spin ﬂuid ground state in a r andom, quantum Heisenberg magnet,

S. Sachdev and J. Ye, “Gapless spin ﬂuid ground state in a r andom, quantum Heisenberg magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339, cond-mat/9212030

arXiv 1993

[4] [2]

A simple model of quantum holography,

A. Kitaev, “A simple model of quantum holography,” Talks at KITP, April and May 2015

work page 2015

[5] [3]

The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-K itaev model and its gravity dual,

A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, “The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-K itaev model and its gravity dual,” JHEP 05 (2018) 183, 1711.08467

arXiv 2018

[6] [4]

Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. 126B (1983) 41–45

1983

[7] [5]

Lower Dimensional Gravity,

R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B252 (1985) 343–356

1985

[8] [6]

Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and Strange Met als,

S. Sachdev, “Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and Strange Met als,” Phys. Rev. X5 (2015), no. 4, 041025, 1506.05111

arXiv 2015