Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 52 references

Electronic structure of 30{\deg} twisted double bilayer graphene

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that 30° twisted double bilayer graphene is electronically decoupled at low energy but strongly coupled at Q points, producing new van Hove singularities, optical-conductivity peaks, and 12-fold-symmetry-like electronic…

desk verdict A competent first tight-binding study of 30° twisted double bilayer graphene that makes a good case for decoupled low-energy physics and Q-point coupling, though the headline VHS and optical peaks lean on a strained approximant that deserves a convergence check. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08439 v3 pith:45KKLL24 submitted 2019-08-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Guodong Yu , Zewen Wu , Zhen Zhan , Mikhail I. Katsnelson , Shengjun Yuan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 73.22.Pr
keywords twisteddoublebilayergraphene30-degreetwistincommensurateinterlayercouplingvanHovesingularityopticalconductivitytight-bindingapproximation15/26approximant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

30° twisted double bilayer graphene—two AB-stacked bilayers rotated by 30°, forming an incommensurate structure—is shown to behave like two decoupled AB-stacked bilayers near the Fermi level: density of states, effective band structure, optical conductivity, and Landau levels all match the untwisted bilayer. The decoupling breaks down at the Q points of the Brillouin zone, where interlayer coupling across the twisted interface produces new van Hove singularities, new peaks in optical conductivity, and electronic states with 12-fold-symmetry-like charge patterns even though the system's point group is only D3. A $k$-space tight-binding analysis shows that the twelve Q points host degenerate Bloch states whose hybridization creates these features. The same effects appear for a 30° twisted interface between a monolayer and an AB-stacked bilayer, indicating a generic mechanism for incommensurate graphene multilayers. If correct, the predictions give experimental fingerprints—extra spectral and optical features—that distinguish the twisted stack from an untwisted one.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the degeneracy of Bloch states at the twelve Q points of the two misoriented Brillouin zones. The authors use the $k$-space tight-binding method with a 12-wave approximation: around $k_0=0$, they keep only reciprocal lattice vectors with length below $4\pi/(\sqrt{3}a)$, building a $48\times48$ Hamiltonian from the Bloch functions $|\mathbf{Q}_i,X\rangle$ (bottom bilayer) and $|\tilde{\mathbf{Q}}_i,\tilde{X}\rangle$ (top bilayer) for $i=0,\dots,5$. Diagonalizing it yields a quasi-band structure that reproduces the unfolded effective band structure around $\tilde{\mathbf{Q}}_1$. The periodic 15/26 approximant—a supercell built by slightly compressing the top bilayer's lattice constant to 2.454 Å—serves as the concrete model for density-of-states and conductivity calculations.

What would settle it

If a calculation that avoids the approximant's artificial strain (for instance, a large incommensurate supercell or a continuum approach) found that the new van Hove singularities and 12-fold-symmetry-like charge patterns disappear or move substantially, the central claim would fail; experimentally, angle-resolved photoemission or scanning tunneling spectroscopy on a real 30° twisted double bilayer sample that shows no extra Q-point spectral features would also falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the low-energy electronic structure of 30° twisted double bilayer graphene is that of two independent AB-stacked bilayers, whereas at the Q points the interlayer coupling is strong and structurally significant. Evidence for decoupling comes from comparing density of states, effective (unfolded) band structure, optical conductivity, and Landau levels with the AB bilayer; evidence for Q-point coupling comes from the effective band structure deviating from AB near $\tilde{\mathbf{Q}}_1$, from the quasi-band structure obtained by diagonalizing a $48\times48$ $k$-space tight-binding Hamiltonian, and from charge distributions of the 24 valence states at $k_0=0$. These charge patterns include 12-fold-symmetry-like states similar to those in 30° twisted bilayer graphene, plus new states with occupancy concentrated on the outer layers. The authors also find that the 30° twisted interface is energetically competitive with AB stacking, and that the same physics occurs for a monolayer-on-bilayer 30° interface.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 15/26 approximant, a periodic pattern that compresses the top bilayer's lattice constant by less than a tenth of a percent, faithfully represents the truly incommensurate 30° twisted double bilayer, including the Q-point coupling effects that drive the paper's central results.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Angle-resolved photoemission and scanning tunneling spectroscopy on a 30° twisted double bilayer should reveal extra van Hove singularities near the Q-point energies that are absent in AB-stacked bilayer graphene.
  • Optical conductivity measurements should show new peaks from Q-point interlayer coupling, giving a clear non-contact signature of the twisted interface even when low-energy transport looks decoupled.
  • Because the same Q-point coupling occurs for a 30° twisted monolayer-on-bilayer interface, the predicted features can be tested in a simpler two-interface stack.
  • Low-energy Landau-level and quantum-Hall experiments on 30° TDBG can be interpreted as two independent AB bilayers, so the twist only enters their analysis through the high-energy sector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 15/26 approximant's strain slightly shifts the Q-point hybridization, the quantitative positions of the new van Hove singularities could differ in a true incommensurate sample, but the qualitative mechanism—degenerate Q-point states coupling across the twisted interface—should persist; a strain-free incommensurate calculation would settle the sizes of any shifts.
  • The authors' picture suggests a design rule for incommensurate graphene stacks: interlayer coupling is only significant where high-symmetry points of the two layers' Brillouin zones coincide, so one could engineer quasicrystal-like electronic states by choosing twist angles that align selected zone boundaries.
  • The states with little weight on the middle two layers are natural candidates for electric-field control: a perpendicular field should selectively tune their energies because they sit on the outer layers, potentially switching the 12-fold-symmetry-like features on and off.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the electronic structure of 30° twisted double bilayer graphene, an incommensurate system approximated by a periodic 15/26 approximant. Using a Slater–Koster tight-binding model and the tight-binding propagation method, it reports that the low-energy spectrum, density of states, optical conductivity, and Landau levels are essentially those of decoupled AB-stacked bilayers. At the Q points, however, the interlayer coupling is strong: the effective band structure deviates from AB-stacked bilayer, new van Hove singularities appear in the DOS, new peaks appear in the optical conductivity, and the charge distributions of the coupled states are modified, some showing 12-fold-symmetry-like patterns. A k-space 12-wave model is used to explain the Q-point coupling. The same effects are stated to occur in a 30° twisted monolayer/bilayer interface.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a systematic characterization of 30° TDBG and identifies Q-point coupling as the mechanism behind spectral features not present in AB-stacked bilayer graphene. A strength is that the low-energy decoupling claim is supported by several independent observables (effective band structure, DOS, optical conductivity, Landau levels), and the k-space 12-wave model is checked against an independent diagonalization of the approximant in Fig. 5, which reduces circularity. The main caveat is that the Q-point-specific predictions are computed in a strained approximant whose validation is deferred to the Supplemental Material. If that approximant faithfully represents the incommensurate system, these results will be useful for interpreting ARPES, STM, and optical experiments on quasicrystalline graphene multilayers.

major comments (1)
  1. [§III, Fig. 2; Appendix A] The central Q-point results (new van Hove singularities in the DOS and new peaks in the optical conductivity, abstract and §III) are computed entirely within the 15/26 approximant, which requires compressing the top bilayer lattice constant from 2.456 Å to 2.454 Å (Appendix A). This ~0.08% homogeneous strain is not a neutral perturbation for the Q-point mechanism: it shifts the relative reciprocal-space positions of the two layers' Q points and can split or merge the degeneracies on which the 12-wave coupling relies. Appendix A states that the approximant 'can reproduce the density of states and the optical conductivity of 30◦ TDBG accurately' but defers the comparison to the Supplemental Material and gives no quantitative criterion. Because the headline claims are based on spectral features whose positions are set by the Q-point coupling, please (i) include the DOS and σ(ω) comparison in the main text, or (ii) show an explicit convergence check against another approximant or against the unstrained k-space model, demonstrating that the new peaks survive with stable positions and weights under the strain. This check is needed before the central claim can be fully accepted.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (9)] The basis states are defined with G, X for the bottom bilayer and ~G, ~X for the top bilayer, but the matrix element in Eq. (9) is written as ⟨k0 + ~G, X|U|k0 + G, ~X⟩, which mixes the tilde convention inconsistently; please check the placement of tildes and the associated phase factors.
  2. [Section V] The claim that 'after the recalculations by using the relaxed interlayer distances, all the physical conclusions concluded above still be kept' is not accompanied by any data; please show the recalculated DOS and optical conductivity, or provide a quantitative statement of how much the Q-point features shift with the interlayer distance.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusion] The last sentence of the abstract states that the same phenomena appear in the 30° twisted monolayer/bilayer interface, but the main text only refers to the Supplemental Material without summarizing any result; please add a brief account in the main text or qualify the abstract.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] Please define the notation εn,L,+, εn,H,+, and ε0,H,+ in the caption, matching the indices used in Eqs. (5)–(6), and state explicitly which Hamiltonian (full or simplified) was used for the TDBG Landau-level calculation.
  5. [Fig. 5 and Section IV] The agreement between the quasi-band structure and the effective band structure is shown only visually; a quantitative measure (e.g., RMS energy difference or spectral-weight overlap) would strengthen the validation of the 12-wave approximation.
  6. [Typos] In the Conclusion, 'occupation nunber' should be 'occupation number'; in Section IV, 'Expect for states' should be 'Except for states'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Q-point coupling is validated against the independent 15/26 approximant and external 30-degree TBG benchmarks; only minor self-cited inputs appear.

full rationale

Walk of the claimed derivation chain: (i) Low-energy interlayer decoupling is established by comparing the 15/26 approximant's DOS, band structure, optical conductivity, and Landau levels with AB-stacked bilayer results and with analytical Landau-level formulas (Eqs. 5-7); this is an external benchmark, not a restatement of the paper's conclusion. (ii) The Q-point coupling is explained by the 12-wave k-space Hamiltonian (Eq. 9) taken from Moon, Koshino, and Son (ref 27), which is not the authors' own work; the resulting quasi-band structure is directly compared in Fig. 5 with the effective band structure obtained by unfolding the independent 15/26 approximant calculation, so the explanation is not forced by construction. (iii) The 12-fold-symmetry-like charge patterns are read off from eigenstates of this 48x48 Hamiltonian and compared with 30-degree TBG patterns from ref 27; no pattern is defined in terms of the target claim in a self-referential way. (iv) The 15/26 approximant and Slater-Koster parameters follow the authors' earlier ref 29, but they are calibrated inputs, and ref 29 is itself fitted to 30-degree TBG experiments, so the citation is external support rather than a load-bearing self-citation. The main weakness is that Appendix A defers the quantitative validation of the approximant for DOS and optical conductivity to the Supplemental Material; that is a verification gap, not a circular reduction. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to an input, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Minor self-citation exists but is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a calibrated tight-binding Hamiltonian, a strained approximant, and a truncated k-space basis. The approximant and the 12-wave truncation are the least externally grounded ingredients; both are checked only against internal consistency or prior 30 degree TBG work, not against experimental data for 30 degree TDBG.

free parameters (5)
  • gamma0 (intralayer hopping) = 3.12 eV
    Slater-Koster Vpp pi amplitude; calibrated in prior same-group work to fit 30 degree TBG Fermi velocity and band structure (Eq. 2). Central band positions depend on it.
  • gamma1 (interlayer hopping) = 0.48 eV
    Vpp sigma amplitude; set with gamma0 from prior calibration to experimental 30 degree TBG results (Eq. 3). Interlayer coupling strength at Q points depends on it.
  • interlayer distance h = 3.349 Å fixed; relaxed 3.46 Å for twisted interface
    Initial all interfaces set to 3.349 Å; later relaxed with REBO and Kolmogorov-Crespi potentials, giving 3.38, 3.46, and 3.61 Å for AB, twisted, and AA interfaces. Charge coupling depends on h.
  • top bilayer lattice constant a_tilde = 2.454 Å
    Slight compression of the top bilayer makes the moiré system commensurate as a 15/26 approximant (Appendix A). This is an ad hoc structural approximation whose fidelity underpins the Q point results.
  • k-space cutoff for 12-wave approximation = G and G_tilde with length below 4 pi / sqrt(3) a
    Truncation of the Bloch basis in the k-space tight-binding method; the paper states this is accurate for 30 degree TBG based on prior work (Section IV). Central Q point coupling is calculated within this truncation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Tight-binding model with one pz orbital per carbon atom and Slater-Koster hoppings (Eqs. 1-4) captures the electronic structure accurately.
    Standard model for graphene systems; parameters are from prior calibrations. All central claims use this Hamiltonian.
  • ad hoc to paper The 15/26 approximant represents the incommensurate 30 degree TDBG.
    The top bilayer is strained to make a commensurate supercell; the main text defers validation to the Supplemental Material (Appendix A). If the strain changes Q point states, the main results are affected.
  • domain assumption The 12-wave k-space Hamiltonian includes all relevant interlayer couplings at Q points.
    Cutoff at G vectors less than 4 pi / sqrt(3) a; validated against 30 degree TBG in ref 27 and for TDBG against effective band structure in Fig. 5 (Section IV).
  • domain assumption AB stacked bilayer subsystems are the correct reference for low-energy decoupling.
    The paper compares 30 degree TDBG to its untwisted subsystem; low-energy Landau levels are compared to analytical results (Section III).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electronic structure of 30{\deg} twisted double bilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/45KKLL24

@misc{pith2026190808439,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electronic structure of 30\deg twisted double bilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/45KKLL24}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08439}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, the electronic properties of 30{\deg} twisted double bilayer graphene, which loses the translational symmetry due to the incommensurate twist angle, are studied by means of the tight-binding approximation. We demonstrate the interlayer decoupling in the low-energy region from various electronic properties, such as the density of states, effective band structure, optical conductivity and Landau level spectrum. However, at Q points, the interlayer coupling results in the appearance of new Van Hove singularities in the density of states, new peaks in the optical conductivity and importantly the 12-fold-symmetry-like electronic states. The k-space tight-binding method is adopted to explain this phenomenon. The electronic states at Q points show the charge distribution patterns more complex than the 30{\deg} twisted bilayer graphene due to the symmetry decrease. These phenomena appear also in the 30{\deg} twisted interface between graphene monolayer and AB stacked bilayer.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08439 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) The top and side views of 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) The occupation numbers of the eigenstates at Γ point. The black and red dots denote the occupation numbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The density of states of AB stacked bilayer graphene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The comparison of the effective band structures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The comparisons of the effective band structure around [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The charge distributions of the electronic states at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The curves of the binding energy with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shallcross , author S

    author author S. Shallcross , author S. Sharma , author E. Kandelaki , \ and\ author O. A. \ Pankratov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.165105 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 81 ,\ pages 165105 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.165105 2010

  2. [2]

    Berger , author Z

    author author C. Berger , author Z. Song , author X. Li , author X. Wu , author N. Brown , author C. Naud , author D. Mayou , author T. Li , author J. Hass , author A. N. \ Marchenkov , author E. H. \ Conrad , author P. N. \ First , \ and\ author W. A. \ de Heer ,\ 10.1126/science.1125925 journal journal Science \ volume 312 ,\ pages 1191 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1125925

  3. [3]

    Hass , author F

    author author J. Hass , author F. Varchon , author J. E. \ Mill\'an-Otoya , author M. Sprinkle , author N. Sharma , author W. A. \ de Heer , author C. Berger , author P. N. \ First , author L. Magaud , \ and\ author E. H. \ Conrad ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.125504 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 125504 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.125504

  4. [4]

    author author D. L. \ Miller , author K. D. \ Kubista , author G. M. \ Rutter , author M. Ruan , author W. A. \ de Heer , author P. N. \ First , \ and\ author J. A. \ Stroscio ,\ 10.1126/science.1171810 journal journal Science \ volume 324 ,\ pages 924 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1171810

  5. [5]

    author author M. L. \ Sadowski , author G. Martinez , author M. Potemski , author C. Berger , \ and\ author W. A. \ de Heer ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.266405 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 266405 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.266405

  6. [6]

    Sprinkle , author D

    author author M. Sprinkle , author D. Siegel , author Y. Hu , author J. Hicks , author A. Tejeda , author A. Taleb-Ibrahimi , author P. Le F\`evre , author F. Bertran , author S. Vizzini , author H. Enriquez , author S. Chiang , author P. Soukiassian , author C. Berger , author W. A. \ de Heer , author A. Lanzara , \ and\ author E. H. \ Conrad ,\ 10.1103/...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.226803

  7. [7]

    author author W. A. \ de Heer , author C. Berger , author X. Wu , author M. Sprinkle , author Y. Hu , author M. Ruan , author J. A. \ Stroscio , author P. N. \ First , author R. Haddon , author B. Piot , author C. Faugeras , author M. Potemski , \ and\ author J.-S. \ Moon ,\ 10.1088/0022-3727/43/37/374007 journal journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Phys...

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/37/374007

  8. [8]

    Sprinkle , author J

    author author M. Sprinkle , author J. Hicks , author A. Tejeda , author A. Taleb-Ibrahimi , author P. L. \ F \` e vre , author F. Bertran , author H. Tinkey , author M. C. \ Clark , author P. Soukiassian , author D. Martinotti , author J. Hass , \ and\ author E. H. \ Conrad ,\ 10.1088/0022-3727/43/37/374006 journal journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Ph...

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/37/374006

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    author author M. M. \ van Wijk , author A. Schuring , author M. I. \ Katsnelson , \ and\ author A. Fasolino ,\ 10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/034010 journal journal 2D Materials \ volume 2 ,\ pages 034010 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  2. [11]

    \ Yin , author J.-B

    author author L.-J. \ Yin , author J.-B. \ Qiao , author W.-X. \ Wang , author W.-J. \ Zuo , author W. Yan , author R. Xu , author R.-F. \ Dou , author J.-C. \ Nie , \ and\ author L. He ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.201408 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 92 ,\ pages 201408 ( ye...

    doi

  3. [12]

    Su\'arez Morell , author J

    author author E. Su\'arez Morell , author J. D. \ Correa , author P. Vargas , author M. Pacheco , \ and\ author Z. Barticevic ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.121407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 82 ,\ pages 121407 ( year 2010 b ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  4. [13]

    Bistritzer \ and\ author A

    author author R. Bistritzer \ and\ author A. H. \ MacDonald ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1108174108 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 108 ,\ pages 12233 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  5. [14]

    Cao , author V

    author author Y. Cao , author V. Fatemi , author S. Fang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author E. Kaxiras , \ and\ author P. Jarillo-Herrero ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26160 journal journal Nature \ volume 556 ,\ pages 43 ( year 2018 a ) ,\ note article NoStop

    doi

  6. [15]

    author author H. C. \ Po , author L. Zou , author A. Vishwanath , \ and\ author T. Senthil ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031089 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 8 ,\ pages 031089 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  7. [16]

    Yankowitz , author S

    author author M. Yankowitz , author S. Chen , author H. Polshyn , author Y. Zhang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author D. Graf , author A. F. \ Young , \ and\ author C. R. \ Dean ,\ 10.1126/science.aav1910 journal journal Science \ volume 363 ,\ pages 1059 ( yea...

    doi

  8. [17]

    Cao , author V

    author author Y. Cao , author V. Fatemi , author A. Demir , author S. Fang , author S. L. \ Tomarken , author J. Y. \ Luo , author J. D. \ Sanchez-Yamagishi , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author E. Kaxiras , author R. C. \ Ashoori , \ and\ author P. Jarillo-Herre...

    doi

  9. [18]

    author author S. J. \ Ahn , author P. Moon , author T.-H. \ Kim , author H.-W. \ Kim , author H.-C. \ Shin , author E. H. \ Kim , author H. W. \ Cha , author S.-J. \ Kahng , author P. Kim , author M. Koshino , author Y.-W. \ Son , author C.-W. \ Yang , \ and\ author J. R. \ Ah...

    doi

  10. [19]

    Yao , author E

    author author W. Yao , author E. Wang , author C. Bao , author Y. Zhang , author K. Zhang , author K. Bao , author C. K. \ Chan , author C. Chen , author J. Avila , author M. C. \ Asensio , author J. Zhu , \ and\ author S. Zhou ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1720865115 journal journal Procee...

    doi

  11. [20]

    Takesaki , author K

    author author Y. Takesaki , author K. Kawahara , author H. Hibino , author S. Okada , author M. Tsuji , \ and\ author H. Ago ,\ 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01137 journal journal Chemistry of Materials \ volume 28 ,\ pages 4583 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [21]

    Pezzini , author V

    author author S. Pezzini , author V. Mišeikis , author G. Piccinini , author S. Forti , author S. Pace , author R. Engelke , author F. Rossella , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author P. Kim , \ and\ author C. Coletti ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00172 journal journal...

    doi

  13. [23]

    author author Y. R. \ Lin , author N. Samiseresht , author M. Franke , author S. Parhizkar , author S. Soubatch , author B. Amorim , author T. L. \ Lee , author C. Kumpf , author F. S. \ Tautz , \ and\ author F. C. \ Bocquet ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07958 journal journal ...

    2018 arXiv

  14. [24]

    author author M. J. \ Park , author H. S. \ Kim , \ and\ author S. Lee ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.245401 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 245401 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  15. [25]

    Koren \ and\ author U

    author author E. Koren \ and\ author U. Duerig ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.201404 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 201404 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  16. [26]

    Suzuki , author T

    author author T. Suzuki , author T. Iimori , author S. J. \ Ahn , author Y. Zhao , author M. Watanabe , author J. Xu , author M. Fujisawa , author T. Kanai , author N. Ishii , author J. Itatani , author K. Suwa , author H. Fukidome , author S. Tanaka , author J. R. \ Ahn , aut...

    doi

  17. [27]

    Moon , author M

    author author P. Moon , author M. Koshino , \ and\ author Y.-W. \ Son ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.165430 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 165430 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  18. [29]

    Yu , author Z

    author author G. Yu , author Z. Wu , author Z. Zhan , author M. I. \ Katsnelson , \ and\ author S. Yuan ,\ 10.1038/s41524-019-0258-0 journal journal npj Computational Materials \ volume 5 ,\ pages 122 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  19. [30]

    Yan , author D.-L

    author author C. Yan , author D.-L. \ Ma , author J.-B. \ Qiao , author H.-Y. \ Zhong , author L. Yang , author S.-Y. \ Li , author Z.-Q. \ Fu , author Y. Zhang , \ and\ author L. He ,\ 10.1088/2053-1583/ab3b16 journal journal 2D Materials \ volume 6 ,\ pages 045041 ( year 201...

    doi

  20. [31]

    Deng , author B

    author author B. Deng , author B. Wang , author N. Li , author R. Li , author Y. Wang , author J. Tang , author Q. Fu , author Z. Tian , author P. Gao , author J. Xue , \ and\ author H. Peng ,\ 10.1021/acsnano.9b07091 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1656 ( year 2...

    doi

  21. [32]

    Liu , author Z

    author author X. Liu , author Z. Hao , author E. Khalaf , author J. Y. \ Lee , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author A. Vishwanath , \ and\ author P. Kim ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08130 journal journal arXiv e-prints \ ,\ pages arXiv:1903.08130 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1903 arXiv

  22. [33]

    Cao , author D

    author author Y. Cao , author D. Rodan-Legrain , author O. Rubies-Bigord \`a , author J. M. \ Park , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , \ and\ author P. Jarillo-Herrero ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08596 journal journal arXiv e-prints \ ,\ pages arXiv:1903.08596 ( yea...

    1903 arXiv

  23. [34]

    author author M. S. \ Scheurer , author R. Samajdar , \ and\ author S. Sachdev ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03258 journal journal arXiv e-prints \ ,\ pages arXiv:1906.03258 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1906 arXiv

  24. [35]

    Shen , author Y

    author author C. Shen , author Y. Chu , author Q. Wu , author N. Li , author S. Wang , author Y. Zhao , author J. Tang , author J. Liu , author J. Tian , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author R. Yang , author Z. Y. \ Meng , author D. Shi , author O. V. \ Yazyev , \...

    doi

  25. [36]

    author author G. W. \ Burg , author J. Zhu , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author A. H. \ MacDonald , \ and\ author E. Tutuc ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.197702 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 123 ,\ pages 197702 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [37]

    Haddadi , author Q

    author author F. Haddadi , author Q. Wu , author A. J. \ Kruchkov , \ and\ author O. V. \ Yazyev ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05117 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 20 ,\ pages 2410 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  27. [38]

    author author N. R. \ Chebrolu , author B. L. \ Chittari , \ and\ author J. Jung ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.235417 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 235417 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  28. [39]

    author author Y. W. \ Choi \ and\ author H. J. \ Choi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.201402 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 100 ,\ pages 201402 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  29. [40]

    Koshino ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.235406 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Koshino ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.235406 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 235406 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  30. [41]

    Liu , author Z

    author author J. Liu , author Z. Ma , author J. Gao , \ and\ author X. Dai ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031021 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 9 ,\ pages 031021 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  31. [42]

    Brown , author R

    author author L. Brown , author R. Hovden , author P. Huang , author M. Wojcik , author D. A. \ Muller , \ and\ author J. Park ,\ 10.1021/nl204547v journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1609 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  32. [43]

    \ Wu , author H

    author author J.-B. \ Wu , author H. Wang , author X.-L. \ Li , author H. Peng , \ and\ author P.-H. \ Tan ,\ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008622316307576 journal journal Carbon \ volume 110 ,\ pages 225 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  33. [44]

    author author J. C. \ Slater \ and\ author G. F. \ Koster ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.94.1498 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 1498 ( year 1954 ) NoStop

    1954 doi

  34. [45]

    Trambly de Laissardi\`ere , author D

    author author G. Trambly de Laissardi\`ere , author D. Mayou , \ and\ author L. Magaud ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.125413 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 125413 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  35. [46]

    Huder , author A

    author author L. Huder , author A. Artaud , author T. Le Quang , author G. T. \ de Laissardi\`ere , author A. G. M. \ Jansen , author G. Lapertot , author C. Chapelier , \ and\ author V. T. \ Renard ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.156405 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 12...

    doi

  36. [47]

    Shi , author Z

    author author H. Shi , author Z. Zhan , author Z. Qi , author K. Huang , author E. v. \ Veen , author J. \'A . \ Silva-Guill \'e n , author R. Zhang , author P. Li , author K. Xie , author H. Ji , author M. I. \ Katsnelson , author S. Yuan , author S. Qin , \ and\ author Z. Zh...

    doi

  37. [48]

    Yuan , author H

    author author S. Yuan , author H. De Raedt , \ and\ author M. I. \ Katsnelson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115448 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 82 ,\ pages 115448 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  38. [49]

    Koshino \ and\ author T

    author author M. Koshino \ and\ author T. Ando ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.115313 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 77 ,\ pages 115313 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  39. [50]

    author author D. W. \ Brenner , author O. A. \ Shenderova , author J. A. \ Harrison , author S. J. \ Stuart , author B. Ni , \ and\ author S. B. \ Sinnott ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 14 ,\ pages 783 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi

  40. [51]

    author author A. N. \ Kolmogorov \ and\ author V. H. \ Crespi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.235415 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 71 ,\ pages 235415 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  41. [52]

    Plimpton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume 117 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    author author S. Plimpton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume 117 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  42. [53]

    The validation of 15/26 approximant

    @noop title See Supplemental Material at link for SI. The validation of 15/26 approximant. SII. The interlayer decoupling in 30 AB/G. SIII. The interlayer coupling at Q points in 30 AB/G. Stop

  43. [54]

    Nishi , author Y.-i

    author author H. Nishi , author Y.-i. \ Matsushita , \ and\ author A. Oshiyama ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.085420 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 085420 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  44. [55]

    om , \ and\ author J. Bj\

    author author P. V. C. \ Medeiros , author S. Stafstr\"om , \ and\ author J. Bj\"ork ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.041407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 041407 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.