Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 158 references

Jackiw-Teitelboim Model Coupled to Conformal Matter in the Semi-Classical Limit

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the semiclassical Jackiw–Teitelboim model with conformal matter, a generalized entropy combining the dilaton at the horizon with matter entanglement increases monotonically along future event horizons and along future Q-screens.

desk verdict Solid GSL proofs in JT with conformal matter; abstract overclaims Q-screen monotonicity for the ψ system. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08523 v2 pith:GCGTKMHS submitted 2019-08-22 hep-th gr-qc

Upamanyu Moitra , Sunil Kumar Sake , Sandip P. Trivedi , V. Vishal This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords Jackiw-TeitelboimgravitygeneralizedentropysecondlawentanglementQ-screensemiclassicalconformalanomalynullenergycondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyses the Jackiw–Teitelboim (JT) model of two-dimensional gravity coupled to $N$ massless scalar fields in the semiclassical limit $N\to\infty$, $G\to 0$ with $NG$ fixed, so that matter is quantum while the gravity–dilaton sector stays classical. Two matter treatments are compared: a single non-minimally coupled scalar $\chi$ whose action reproduces the conformal anomaly of the $N$ scalars, and the original $N$ free scalars $\psi_i$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions. The central claim is that a generalized entropy—the horizon dilaton term plus entanglement across the horizon, $S^\chi_{\rm gen}=\varphi/(4G)-N\chi/6$ and $S^\psi_{\rm gen}=S_{\rm BH}+S_{\rm EE}$—obeys the second law along the future event horizon and increases along future Q-screens, provided additional infalling matter satisfies the null energy condition. The two systems differ in their thermodynamics, mass formulae, and relaxation: the $\chi$ system rings down through a quasi-normal mode with exponent $\zeta J/2+2\pi T$, while the $\psi$ system thermalises instantaneously.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the replacement of quantum matter by data encoded in the conformal anomaly. In the $\chi$ system this is the single non-minimally coupled scalar $I_\chi=-\frac{N}{24\pi}\int\sqrt{-g}\,[(\partial\chi)^2+R\chi]$, which becomes classical in the large-$N$ limit and whose horizon value contributes $-N\chi/6$ to the entropy; its dynamics reduces the back-reaction problem to a third-order equation for the boundary mode $h(x^-)$. In the $\psi$ system the load-bearing object is the entanglement entropy $S_{\rm EE}=\frac{N}{12}\left[\ln\frac{(\Delta x^+_v)^2}{\delta^2}+2\rho_h\right]$ computed from the vacuum coordinate $x^+_v$ set by the boundary condition. The proof of monotonicity then runs through the quantum focusing condition, $d^2S_{\rm gen}/d\lambda^2<0$, which the paper verifies directly from the equations of motion plus the null energy condition.

What would settle it

Compute the full one-loop stress tensor of the $N$ minimally coupled scalars in a time-dependent infalling geometry, without replacing them by $\chi$, and evaluate $dS_{\rm gen}/d\lambda$ along the future event horizon: a NEC-satisfying pulse that makes the derivative negative would falsify the second-law claim as stated for general conformal matter. A more targeted check is whether the approximate $\chi$-system equation $h'''=-\zeta\,h''/h-16\pi G\,T^m_{--}$, valid under the slow-variation condition (3.43), admits any $T^m_{--}>0$ profile for which $S^\chi_{\rm gen}$ decreases along the event horizon.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that generalized entropy is a genuine second-law quantity in both matter systems. For infalling matter with $T^m_{--}>0$ (and $T^m_{++}=0$), the authors prove $\frac{dS_{\rm gen}}{d\lambda}>0$ along the future event horizon, with the derivative approaching zero at late times, and they prove the same entropy is monotone along a future Q-screen, the analogue of the apparent-horizon locus built from quantum expansion. Along the way they show the first law $T\,dS_{\rm gen}=dM$ holds in both systems, that the $\psi$-system corrections can be absorbed into a rescaling of Newton's constant ($G\to G/(1-\zeta/2\tilde\varphi_B)$), and that the $\chi$-system entropy at the apparent horizon can decrease even when the event-horizon entropy increases.

Load-bearing premise

The $\chi$ system is trusted as a faithful stand-in for the $N$ scalar fields only because its classical action reproduces the conformal anomaly, and the paper does not prove that this single field also captures the full back-reaction of the $\psi_i$ beyond the trace anomaly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In both matter systems, black hole formation and evaporation driven by NEC-satisfying infalling matter is accompanied by a monotone generalized entropy along the future event horizon, not just at equilibrium.
  • The generalized entropy increases along future Q-screens, so the quantum focusing condition holds in these semiclassical JT models and gives a well-defined entropy law for the apparent-horizon analogue.
  • In the $\psi$ system the entire effect of $N$ conformal scalars at small temperature can be absorbed into a renormalised Newton constant, leaving the classical Schwarzian thermodynamics intact; in the $\chi$ system it cannot, producing a $\sqrt\mu$ correction to the mass.
  • Relaxation after infalling matter stops is exponentially slow in the $\chi$ system, with decay rate $\zeta J/2+2\pi T$, and instantaneous in the $\psi$ system, so the two boundary conditions are distinguishable dynamically.
  • The generalized first law $T\,dS_{\rm gen}=dM$ holds with the same generalized entropy that obeys the second law, giving a consistent thermodynamic description beyond the classical area law.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the anomaly replacement is exact beyond the trace, the $\chi$-system quasi-normal frequency $\zeta J/2+2\pi T$ should be a universal ring-down signature of semiclassical back-reaction in any JT-like model with the same anomaly, and could be searched for in numerical simulations of the full $N$-scalar system.
  • The $\psi$-system result suggests that for near-extremal black holes in higher dimensions, light conformal matter may only renormalise the Schwarzian coefficient at leading order in the semiclassical limit; checking this against an explicit dimensional reduction with $N$ scalars would test the model's applicability.
  • The apparent-horizon counterexample in the $\chi$ system indicates that quasilocal entropy candidates built from the apparent horizon fail the second law in this setting, so any generalisation of the area theorem to semiclassical gravity should be formulated on the event horizon or Q-screen rather than the apparent horizon.
  • The QNEC derivation in both systems suggests a direct route to proving the quantum focusing condition in other two-dimensional dilaton-gravity models with the same matter content, provided their equations of motion take the same form.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity coupled to N massless free scalars in the semiclassical limit N→∞, G→0 with GN fixed, and compares two systems: a single non-minimally coupled scalar χ chosen to reproduce the conformal anomaly of the N scalars, and the original N-scalar system ψ with Dirichlet boundary conditions. For each system the authors compute black hole thermodynamics, define a generalized entropy (Sχ_gen = φ/(4G) − Nχ/6 and Sψ_gen = SBH + SEE), verify the first law, study the response to additional infalling matter satisfying the null energy condition, and prove that the generalized entropy increases monotonically along the future event horizon. They also derive a quasi-normal mode for the χ system, observe instantaneous thermalization in the ψ system, and claim that the generalized entropy increases along future Q-screens in both systems. Appendices contain detailed computations of the ADM mass, coordinate transformations, late-time behavior of h, and a counterexample showing that the apparent-horizon generalized second law fails in the χ system.

Significance. If the advertised results hold, the paper is a useful contribution to semiclassical JT gravity. The event-horizon generalized second law proofs in Sections 3.4 and 4.4 are explicit, equation-of-motion-level arguments that use only the null energy condition and the field equations, and they are the strongest part of the paper. The derivation of the QFC/QNEC relations in Section 5 is also clean and instructive. The comparison between the χ and ψ systems is conceptually interesting, and the detailed renormalization computations in Appendix B are a useful reference. However, the abstract overclaims the Q-screen result for the ψ system, and the status of the χ system as a faithful surrogate for the N-scalar theory is assumed rather than established. These issues are load-bearing for the central advertised claims and require attention.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.2, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.2) and (5.13)] The abstract and the conclusion state that the generalized entropy increases along future Q-screens in both systems, but this is not proven for the ψ system. The future Q-screen is defined by Eqs. (5.1)–(5.2), which require both ∂−Sgen = 0 and ∂+Sgen < 0. For the ψ system, Eq. (5.13) gives the quantum focusing condition along the x− direction, which implies ∂−²Sψ_gen < 0. This rules out two points with the same x+ on a ∂−Sψ_gen = 0 locus, so the locus can be parametrized by x+, but monotonicity of Sψ_gen along that locus is not established without the sign of ∂+Sψ_gen. The authors themselves write in §5.2: “in contrast with the χ system, the condition ∂+Sψ_gen < 0 is not obviously met along a quantum marginal surface where ∂−Sψ_gen = 0.” Without this condition, the ∂−Sψ_gen = 0 locus is not guaranteed to be a future Q-screen under the paper’s own definition, and the direction of monotonicity is undetermined. Thus the advertised Q-screen monotonicity for the ψ system is unsupported; the event-horizon generalized second law in §4.4 is unaffected.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (1.1) and (3.3); end of §4.3] The χ field is introduced as “one way to include the quantum effects of the ψ_i fields,” but the only matching condition demonstrated is the conformal anomaly trace, Eq. (3.2). The full stress tensors of the two systems are not equal in general: the χ-system T−− used in the infall problem, Eqs. (3.42) and (3.92), differs from the ψ-system T−−, Eq. (4.37), and at the end of Section 4.3 the authors attribute the physical differences between the two systems precisely to this difference in T−−. Consequently, the χ-system results in Sections 3, 3.4, and 5.1 are properties of an auxiliary single-field model, not established results for the original N-scalar theory. The paper should either prove equivalence at the level of the renormalized stress tensor and the entanglement contribution used in Sgen, or explicitly present the χ system as an independent toy model and adjust the abstract’s “both systems” wording accordingly.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (3.43); Appendix C] The χ-system infall equation (3.45), the quasi-normal mode analysis of Section 3.3, and the explicit χ Q-screen inequality (5.10) all rely on the slow-variation approximation (3.43). Appendix C gives a self-consistency argument rather than a controlled error estimate: it uses the approximated equation (3.45) to show that h decreases monotonically, and then cites that monotonic decrease to justify dropping the derivative terms. The conclusion already admits that general time-dependent situations are not analyzed, but the abstract and the χ Q-screen discussion in Section 5.1 do not carry this caveat. The authors should state explicitly which advertised χ-system results are conditional on (3.43).
  4. [§4.2, Eq. (4.34)] The mass formula (4.34) is obtained by assuming the first law: the text says “If we now assume the first law, we can calculate the mass.” This is a consistency check, not an independent derivation, and its use to extend the ψ-system thermodynamics beyond the small-temperature regime should be labeled as such. The circularity does not affect the small-temperature first-law verification in Eq. (4.31) or the event-horizon GSL proof in Section 4.4, but the current presentation makes it look like an independent prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.2] The phrase “monotonically varying” is ambiguous; since the direction of variation is exactly what is not fixed without the sign of ∂+Sψ_gen, this wording should be replaced by a precise statement about whether the entropy increases or decreases along the surface.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.28)] The comparison with reference [41] states that the value in Eq. (122) of that reference corresponds to N = 9 in Eq. (3.28), but no derivation of this identification is given; a one-sentence explanation of the convention mapping would make the comparison checkable.
  3. [References] Reference [144] is listed as “to appear” without an arXiv number or publication details; please update it if a preprint or published version is available.
  4. [§4.4, Eq. (4.53)] The right-hand side of Eq. (4.53) contains a term proportional to 1/ζ, so the ζ → 0 classical limit is not manifest; a brief comment on how this limit is recovered would be helpful, since ζ is held fixed in the semiclassical limit but the classical comparison is used elsewhere in the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: monotonicity proofs follow from equations of motion; the ψ-system Q-screen gap is an unsupported claim, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's core derivations are self-contained reductions from the semiclassical equations of motion. For the χ system, Sχ_gen is defined explicitly and the first law is checked, not imposed; the monotonicity proof uses the full '−−' Einstein equation, eq. (3.93), to obtain d^2 Sχ_gen/dλ^2 < 0, and the late-time h behaviour gives dSχ_gen/dλ -> 0, so monotonicity follows from the equations and the NEC rather than from a fitted parameter. For the ψ system, Sψ_gen = SBH + SEE and eq. (4.53) is derived from the equation of motion for h, eq. (4.52); again the second law is a consequence of the equations, not an input. The χ action is explicitly introduced as an effective stand-in whose non-minimal coupling reproduces the conformal anomaly (eqs. (1.1), (3.3)); the paper does not pretend χ is derived from ψ, so this is a modelling assumption rather than a circular reduction. The only passage that could look like an assumed input is eq. (4.34), where the mass in a general regime is obtained 'If we now assume the first law'; however this formula is not used in the event-horizon monotonicity proof, so it is not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. Self-citations ([18], [30], [39], [48], [141]) are contextual and not load-bearing; [6] is an external prior work. The one genuine weakness is a correctness gap, not circularity: Section 5.2 concedes 'in contrast with the χ system, the condition ∂+Sψ_gen < 0 is not obviously met along a quantum marginal surface where ∂−Sψ_gen = 0', so the abstract's statement that the generalized entropy increases along future Q-screens in the ψ system is not established. That is an unsupported advertised claim, but it does not reduce the derivation to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard JT setup, the semiclassical large-N limit, the χ-field modeling replacement, the chosen boundary conditions, and the null energy condition. The only genuinely free parameter introduced for the χ mass formula is a, an initial-state/SL(2,R) frame parameter; all other constants are either fixed by the actions, by boundary conditions, or by the equations of motion.

free parameters (1)
  • a = not fixed, parameter of the SL(2,R) frame or initial χ state
    Introduced in equations (3.61)-(3.64) and appendix B.3. It appears in the χ-system mass formula (3.64)/(B.36) and is not determined by the equations of motion; it encodes the initial condition for χ. The paper shows the mass is SL(2,R) invariant when a transforms appropriately.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The JT gravity action (2.1) with fixed-dilaton boundary (2.7) is the correct semiclassical starting point.
    Defines the theory under study; standard in the JT literature and used throughout.
  • domain assumption The semiclassical limit N→∞, G→0 with GN fixed keeps matter quantum effects while treating gravity and the dilaton classically.
    This large-N limit is the organizing approximation of the paper, stated in Section 1.
  • domain assumption The single non-minimally coupled χ field with action (3.3) faithfully represents the back-reaction of the N scalar fields beyond reproducing the conformal anomaly.
    Used to define the χ system in Section 3; only the trace anomaly is shown to match, not the full dynamics.
  • domain assumption Boundary conditions χB=0 and ψi|B=0 are imposed on the two matter systems.
    These boundary conditions drive the differences between the χ and ψ systems; stated in Section 1 and eq. (4.1).
  • domain assumption Additional infalling matter satisfies the null energy condition, eqs. (2.26)-(2.27).
    All second-law and Q-screen monotonicity proofs use this condition; if it fails the proofs do not go through.
  • domain assumption The slow-variation approximation (3.43) and small-temperature condition (2.20) justify truncating derivative terms.
    Used to reduce the χ equation to (3.45) and to derive mass formulas; validity is argued self-consistently in Appendix C but not rigorously proven.
  • standard math Standard CFT results for trace anomaly, stress tensor transformation, entanglement entropy formula (4.9), and QFC/QNEC are valid.
    Background results from references [138], [139], [132], and [133] are used without proof.
  • domain assumption The matter state is the appropriate vacuum (Poincaré, Kruskal, or reflected vacuum) for each system.
    The entanglement entropy and stress tensor components depend on this state choice, as discussed in Sections 4.1-4.3.
invented entities (1)
  • χ field
    purpose: A single non-minimally coupled scalar whose action (3.3) reproduces the conformal anomaly of N free scalars; used as the matter sector in the first model.
    The χ field's defining feature is that it gives the same trace anomaly as the N fields, so it has no independent falsifiable handle beyond that match. It is a computational surrogate, not a new physical particle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Jackiw-Teitelboim Model Coupled to Conformal Matter in the Semi-Classical Limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GCGTKMHS

@misc{pith2026190808523,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Jackiw-Teitelboim Model Coupled to Conformal Matter in the Semi-Classical Limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GCGTKMHS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08523}
}
abstract

We analyse the Jackiw-Teitelboim model of 2D gravity coupled to $N$ massless free scalar fields in the semi-classical limit. Two systems are studied which essentially differ in the boundary conditions that are imposed. We find that the thermodynamics has interesting differences. We also analyse the response to additional infalling matter which satisfies the null energy condition. The second law is shown to be valid in both systems for the generalised entropy which takes into account the entanglement across the event horizon due to the matter fields. Similarly we find that the generalised entropy increases along future Q-screens in both systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jackiw, Lower dimensional gravity, Nuclear Physics B 252 (1985) 343 – 356

    R. Jackiw, Lower dimensional gravity, Nuclear Physics B 252 (1985) 343 – 356

    1985

  2. [2]

    Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions , Phys

    C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions , Phys. Lett. 126B (1983) 41–45

    1983

  3. [3]

    Muta and S

    T. Muta and S. D. Odintsov, Two-dimensional higher derivative quantum gravity with constant curvature constraint, Prog. Theor. Phys. 90 (1993) 247–255

    1993

  4. [4]

    J. P. S. Lemos and P. M. Sa, Nonsingular constant curvature two-dimensional black hole , Mod. Phys. Lett. A9 (1994) 771–774, [ gr-qc/9309023]

    arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    J. P. S. Lemos, Thermodynamics of the two-dimensional black hole in the Teitelboim-Jackiw theory, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 6206–6212, [ gr-qc/9608016]

    arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    Almheiri and J

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 11 (2015) 014, [ 1402.6334]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Jensen, Chaos in AdS 2 Holography, Phys

    K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS 2 Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 111601, [ 1605.06098]. – 52 –

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Engels¨ oy, T

    J. Engels¨ oy, T. G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 07 (2016) 139, [ 1606.03438]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 158 references
  1. [9]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space , PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104, [ 1606.01857]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Cvetiˇ c and I

    M. Cvetiˇ c and I. Papadimitriou,AdS2 holographic dictionary, JHEP 12 (2016) 008, [1608.07018]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Diving into traversable wormholes , Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) 1700034, [ 1704.05333]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dubovsky, V

    S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi, Asymptotic fragility, near AdS 2 holography and TT , JHEP 09 (2017) 136, [ 1706.06604]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Taylor, Generalized conformal structure, dilaton gravity and SYK , JHEP 01 (2018) 010, [1706.07812]

    M. Taylor, Generalized conformal structure, dilaton gravity and SYK , JHEP 01 (2018) 010, [1706.07812]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Kourkoulou and J

    I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena, Pure states in the SYK model and nearly- AdS2 gravity, 1707.02325

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Grumiller, R

    D. Grumiller, R. McNees, J. Salzer, C. Valc´ arcel and D. Vassilevich, Menagerie of AdS 2 boundary conditions, JHEP 10 (2017) 203, [ 1708.08471]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    H. A. Gonz´ alez, D. Grumiller and J. Salzer, Towards a bulk description of higher spin SYK , JHEP 05 (2018) 083, [ 1802.01562]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gaikwad, L

    A. Gaikwad, L. K. Joshi, G. Mandal and S. R. Wadia, Holographic dual to charged SYK from 3D Gravity and Chern-Simons , 1802.07746

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Nayak, A

    P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R. M. Soni, S. P. Trivedi and V. Vishal, On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes, 1802.09547

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    K. S. Kolekar and K. Narayan, AdS2 dilaton gravity from reductions of some nonrelativistic theories, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 046012, [ 1803.06827]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Maldacena and X.-L

    J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi, Eternal traversable wormhole , 1804.00491

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Harlow and D

    D. Harlow and D. Jafferis, The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity , 1804.01081

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Li, S.-L

    Y.-Z. Li, S.-L. Li and H. Lu, Exact Embeddings of JT Gravity in Strings and M-theory , 1804.09742

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    I. Bena, P. Heidmann and D. Turton, AdS2 holography: mind the cap , JHEP 12 (2018) 028, [1806.02834]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Larsen, A nAttractor mechanism for nAdS 2/nCFT1 holography, JHEP 04 (2019) 055, [1806.06330]

    F. Larsen, A nAttractor mechanism for nAdS 2/nCFT1 holography, JHEP 04 (2019) 055, [1806.06330]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A. Goel, H. T. Lam, G. J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, Expanding the Black Hole Interior: Partially Entangled Thermal States in SYK , JHEP 02 (2019) 156, [ 1807.03916]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Lin, Entanglement entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity , 1807.06575

    J. Lin, Entanglement entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity , 1807.06575

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Castro, F

    A. Castro, F. Larsen and I. Papadimitriou, 5D Rotating Black Holes and the nAdS 2/nCFT1 Correspondence, 1807.06988

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Callebaut and H

    N. Callebaut and H. Verlinde, Entanglement Dynamics in 2D CFT with Boundary: Entropic origin of JT gravity and Schwarzian QM , JHEP 05 (2019) 045, [ 1808.05583]. – 53 –

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kitaev and S

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole , JHEP 05 (2019) 198, [ 1808.07032]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Moitra, S

    U. Moitra, S. P. Trivedi and V. Vishal, Extremal and near-extremal black holes and near-CFT1, JHEP 07 (2019) 055, [ 1808.08239]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Yang, The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes , JHEP 05 (2019) 205, [1809.08647]

    Z. Yang, The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes , JHEP 05 (2019) 205, [1809.08647]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, H. W. Lin, L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and Y. Zhao, Complexity of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity , Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 046016, [ 1810.08741]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Larsen and Y

    F. Larsen and Y. Zeng, Black hole spectroscopy and AdS 2 holography, JHEP 04 (2019) 164, [1811.01288]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Blommaert, T

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Fine Structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity, 1812.00918

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Alishahiha, On complexity of Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity , Eur

    M. Alishahiha, On complexity of Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity , Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 365, [1811.09028]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    A. Dhar, A. Gaikwad, L. K. Joshi, G. Mandal and S. R. Wadia, Gravitational collapse in SYK models and Choptuik-like phenomenon , 1812.03979

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    K. S. Kolekar and K. Narayan, On AdS2 holography from redux, renormalization group flows and c-functions , JHEP 02 (2019) 039, [ 1810.12528]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    K. Goto, H. Marrochio, R. C. Myers, L. Queimada and B. Yoshida, Holographic Complexity Equals Which Action? , JHEP 02 (2019) 160, [ 1901.00014]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Sachdev, Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS 2 horizons, J

    S. Sachdev, Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS 2 horizons, J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019) 052303, [ 1902.04078]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Blommaert, T

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity, 1902.11194

    1902 arXiv

  33. [41]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral , 1903.11115

    1903 arXiv

  34. [42]

    T. G. Mertens, Towards Black Hole Evaporation in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity , 1903.10485

    1903 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Maldacena, G

    J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci and Z. Yang, Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity , 1904.01911

    1904 arXiv

  36. [44]

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, Defects in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity , 1904.05228

    1904 arXiv

  37. [45]

    L. V. Iliesiu, S. S. Pufu, H. Verlinde and Y. Wang, An exact quantization of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, 1905.02726

    1905 arXiv

  38. [46]

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, Symmetries Near the Horizon , 1904.12820

    1904 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cotler, K

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen and A. Maloney, Low-dimensional de Sitter quantum gravity , 1905.03780

    1905 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Moitra, S

    U. Moitra, S. K. Sake, S. P. Trivedi and V. Vishal, Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity and Rotating Black Holes, 1905.10378

    1905 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Castro and V

    A. Castro and V. Godet, Breaking away from the near horizon of extreme Kerr , 1906.09083. – 54 –

    1906 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, JT Gravity and the Ensembles of Random Matrix Theory , 1907.03363

    1907 arXiv

  43. [51]

    D. J. Gross, J. Kruthoff, A. Rolph and E. Shaghoulian, TT in AdS2 and Quantum Mechanics, 1907.04873

    1907 arXiv

  44. [52]

    J. Hong, F. Larsen and J. T. Liu, The Scales of Black Holes with nAdS 2 Geometry, 1907.08862

    1907 arXiv

  45. [53]

    S´ arosi,AdS2 holography and the SYK model , PoS Modave2017 (2018) 001, [1711.08482]

    G. S´ arosi,AdS2 holography and the SYK model , PoS Modave2017 (2018) 001, [1711.08482]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    L. K. Joshi, A. Mukhopadhyay and A. Soloviev, Time-dependentNAdS 2 holography with applications, 1901.08877

    1901 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339, [ cond-mat/9212030]

    1993 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography , Talks at KITP (2015)

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography , Talks at KITP (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    Polchinski and V

    J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus, The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model , JHEP 04 (2016) 001, [ 1601.06768]

    2016 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 106002, [ 1604.07818]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Jevicki, K

    A. Jevicki, K. Suzuki and J. Yoon, Bi-Local Holography in the SYK Model, JHEP 07 (2016) 007, [1603.06246]

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Danshita, M

    I. Danshita, M. Hanada and M. Tezuka, Creating and probing the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model with ultracold gases: Towards experimental studies of quantum gravity , PTEP 2017 (2017) 083I01, [1606.02454]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bagrets, A

    D. Bagrets, A. Altland and A. Kamenev, Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model as Liouville quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B911 (2016) 191–205, [ 1607.00694]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Jevicki and K

    A. Jevicki and K. Suzuki, Bi-Local Holography in the SYK Model: Perturbations , JHEP 11 (2016) 046, [ 1608.07567]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Gu, X.-L

    Y. Gu, X.-L. Qi and D. Stanford, Local criticality, diffusion and chaos in generalized Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, JHEP 05 (2017) 125, [ 1609.07832]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [64]

    D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, A Generalization of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev , JHEP 02 (2017) 093, [1610.01569]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Berkooz, P

    M. Berkooz, P. Narayan, M. Rozali and J. Sim´ on, Higher Dimensional Generalizations of the SYK Model , JHEP 01 (2017) 138, [ 1610.02422]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa and J. J. M. Verbaarschot,Spectral and thermodynamic properties of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 126010, [ 1610.03816]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    W. Fu, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena and S. Sachdev, Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 026009, [ 1610.08917]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Witten, An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder , 1610.09758

    E. Witten, An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder , 1610.09758

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Gurau, The complete 1/N expansion of a SYK–like tensor model , Nucl

    R. Gurau, The complete 1/N expansion of a SYK–like tensor model , Nucl. Phys. B916 (2017) 386–401, [ 1611.04032]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, Uncolored random tensors, melon diagrams, and the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 046004, [ 1611.08915]. – 55 –

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    R. A. Davison, W. Fu, A. Georges, Y. Gu, K. Jensen and S. Sachdev, Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography, Phys. Rev. B95 (2017) 155131, [ 1612.00849]

    2017 arXiv

  64. [72]

    C. Peng, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, A Supersymmetric SYK-like Tensor Model , JHEP 05 (2017) 062, [ 1612.03851]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Krishnan, S

    C. Krishnan, S. Sanyal and P. N. Bala Subramanian, Quantum Chaos and Holographic Tensor Models, JHEP 03 (2017) 056, [ 1612.06330]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Turiaci and H

    G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, Towards a 2d QFT Analog of the SYK Model , JHEP 10 (2017) 167, [1701.00528]

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    T. Li, J. Liu, Y. Xin and Y. Zhou, Supersymmetric SYK model and random matrix theory , JHEP 06 (2017) 111, [ 1702.01738]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gurau, Quenched equals annealed at leading order in the colored SYK model , EPL 119 (2017) 30003, [ 1702.04228]

    R. Gurau, Quenched equals annealed at leading order in the colored SYK model , EPL 119 (2017) 30003, [ 1702.04228]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Mandal, P

    G. Mandal, P. Nayak and S. R. Wadia, Coadjoint orbit action of Virasoro group and two-dimensional quantum gravity dual to SYK/tensor models , 1702.04266

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Bonzom, L

    V. Bonzom, L. Lionni and A. Tanasa, Diagrammatics of a colored SYK model and of an SYK-like tensor model, leading and next-to-leading orders , J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) 052301, [1702.06944]

    2017 arXiv

  71. [79]

    D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, The Bulk Dual of SYK: Cubic Couplings , JHEP 05 (2017) 092, [1702.08016]

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory , JHEP 10 (2017) 008, [ 1703.04612]

    2017 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Krishnan, K

    C. Krishnan, K. V. P. Kumar and S. Sanyal, Random Matrices and Holographic Tensor Models, JHEP 06 (2017) 036, [ 1703.08155]

    2017 arXiv

  74. [82]

    S. R. Das, A. Jevicki and K. Suzuki, Three Dimensional View of the SYK/AdS Duality , JHEP 09 (2017) 017, [ 1704.07208]

    2017 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Narayan and J

    P. Narayan and J. Yoon, SYK-like Tensor Models on the Lattice , JHEP 08 (2017) 083, [1705.01554]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Chaudhuri, V

    S. Chaudhuri, V. I. Giraldo-Rivera, A. Joseph, R. Loganayagam and J. Yoon, Abelian Tensor Models on the Lattice , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 086007, [ 1705.01930]

    2018 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Murugan, D

    J. Murugan, D. Stanford and E. Witten, More on Supersymmetric and 2d Analogs of the SYK Model, JHEP 08 (2017) 146, [ 1706.05362]

    2017 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Krishnan and K

    C. Krishnan and K. V. P. Kumar, Towards a Finite-N Hologram, 1706.05364

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, A line of CFTs: from generalized free fields to SYK , JHEP 07 (2017) 086, [ 1706.07015]

    2017 arXiv

  80. [88]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, B. Loureiro, A. Romero-Berm´ udez and M. Tezuka,Chaotic-Integrable Transition in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 241603, [1707.02197]

    2018 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Anous and R. T. D’Agnolo, Marginal deformations & rotating horizons , JHEP 12 (2017) 095, [ 1707.03380]. – 56 –

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Giombi, I

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, Bosonic tensor models at large N and small ϵ, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 106014, [ 1707.03866]

    2017 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Sonner and M

    J. Sonner and M. Vielma, Eigenstate thermalization in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , JHEP 11 (2017) 149, [ 1707.08013]

    2017 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Bulycheva, I

    K. Bulycheva, I. R. Klebanov, A. Milekhin and G. Tarnopolsky, Spectra of Operators in LargeN Tensor Models, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 026016, [ 1707.09347]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Choudhury, A

    S. Choudhury, A. Dey, I. Halder, L. Janagal, S. Minwalla and R. Poojary, Notes on melonic O(N)q−1 tensor models, JHEP 06 (2018) 094, [ 1707.09352]

    2018 arXiv

  86. [94]

    D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, All point correlation functions in SYK , JHEP 12 (2017) 148, [1710.08113]

    2017 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Kitaev and S

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual, JHEP 05 (2018) 183, [ 1711.08467]

    2018 arXiv

  88. [96]

    S. R. Das, A. Ghosh, A. Jevicki and K. Suzuki, Three Dimensional View of Arbitrary q SYK models, JHEP 02 (2018) 162, [ 1711.09839]

    2018 arXiv

  89. [97]

    S. R. Das, A. Ghosh, A. Jevicki and K. Suzuki, Space-Time in the SYK Model , JHEP 07 (2018) 184, [ 1712.02725]

    2018 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Narayan and J

    P. Narayan and J. Yoon, Supersymmetric SYK Model with Global Symmetry , JHEP 08 (2018) 159, [ 1712.02647]

    2018 arXiv

  91. [99]

    F. M. Haehl and M. Rozali, Fine Grained Chaos in AdS2 Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 121601, [ 1712.04963]

    2018 arXiv

  92. [100]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa and M. Tezuka,Many-body localization in a finite-range Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and holography, Phys. Rev. B99 (2019) 054202, [ 1801.03204]

    2019 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Krishnan and K

    C. Krishnan and K. V. Pavan Kumar, Exact Solution of a Strongly Coupled Gauge Theory in 0+1 Dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 201603, [ 1802.02502]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [102]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and A. Streicher, Operator growth in the SYK model , JHEP 06 (2018) 122, [ 1802.02633]

    2018 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Benedetti and R

    D. Benedetti and R. Gurau, 2PI effective action for the SYK model and tensor field theories, JHEP 05 (2018) 156, [ 1802.05500]

    2018 arXiv

  96. [104]

    I. R. Klebanov, A. Milekhin, F. Popov and G. Tarnopolsky, Spectra of eigenstates in fermionic tensor quantum mechanics , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 106023, [ 1802.10263]

    2018 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Gharibyan, M

    H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker and M. Tezuka, Onset of Random Matrix Behavior in Scrambling Systems , JHEP 07 (2018) 124, [ 1803.08050]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [106]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity , 1806.06840

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    S. S. Gubser, C. Jepsen, Z. Ji and B. Trundy, Higher melonic theories , JHEP 09 (2018) 049, [1806.04800]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Blommaert, T

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, The Schwarzian Theory - A Wilson Line Perspective, JHEP 12 (2018) 022, [ 1806.07765]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Chang, S

    C.-M. Chang, S. Colin-Ellerin and M. Rangamani, On Melonic Supertensor Models , JHEP 10 (2018) 157, [ 1806.09903]. – 57 –

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Gur-Ari, R

    G. Gur-Ari, R. Mahajan and A. Vaezi, Does the SYK model have a spin glass phase? , JHEP 11 (2018) 070, [ 1806.10145]

    2018 arXiv

  103. [111]

    J. Liu, E. Perlmutter, V. Rosenhaus and D. Simmons-Duffin, d-dimensional SYK, AdS Loops, and 6j Symbols, JHEP 03 (2019) 052, [ 1808.00612]

    2019 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Giombi, I

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, F. Popov, S. Prakash and G. Tarnopolsky, Prismatic Large N Models for Bosonic Tensors , Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 105005, [ 1808.04344]

    2018 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Pakrouski, I

    K. Pakrouski, I. R. Klebanov, F. Popov and G. Tarnopolsky, Spectrum of Majorana Quantum Mechanics with O(4)3 Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 011601, [1808.07455]

    2019 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Blake, R

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov and H. Liu, Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography, JHEP 10 (2018) 035, [ 1809.01169]

    2018 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Bhattacharya, D

    R. Bhattacharya, D. P. Jatkar and N. Sorokhaibam, Quantum Quenches and Thermalization in SYK models , 1811.06006

    arXiv

  108. [116]

    Murugan and H

    J. Murugan and H. Nastase, One-dimensional bosonization and the SYK model , 1812.11929

    arXiv

  109. [117]

    J. Kim, I. R. Klebanov, G. Tarnopolsky and W. Zhao, Symmetry Breaking in Coupled SYK or Tensor Models, 1902.02287

    1902 arXiv

  110. [118]

    F. Sun, Y. Yi-Xiang, J. Ye and W. M. Liu, Classification of the quantum chaos in colored Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, 1903.02213

    1903 arXiv

  111. [119]

    H. Guo, Y. Gu and S. Sachdev, Transport and chaos in lattice Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models , 1904.02174

    1904 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Nayak, J

    P. Nayak, J. Sonner and M. Vielma, Eigenstate Thermalisation in the conformal Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model: an analytic approach , 1903.00478

    1903 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Sun and J

    F. Sun and J. Ye, Periodic Table of SYK and supersymmetric SYK , 1905.07694

    1905 arXiv

  114. [122]

    I. R. Klebanov, P. N. Pallegar and F. K. Popov, Majorana Fermion Quantum Mechanics for Higher Rank Tensors , 1905.06264

    1905 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Rosenhaus, An introduction to the SYK model , 1807.03334

    V. Rosenhaus, An introduction to the SYK model , 1807.03334

    arXiv

  116. [124]

    Chen and P

    Y. Chen and P. Zhang, Entanglement Entropy of Two Coupled SYK Models and Eternal Traversable Wormhole, JHEP 07 (2019) 033, [ 1903.10532]

    2019 arXiv

  117. [125]

    A. C. Wall, Ten Proofs of the Generalized Second Law , JHEP 06 (2009) 021, [ 0901.3865]

    2009 arXiv

  118. [126]

    A. C. Wall, Proving the Achronal Averaged Null Energy Condition from the Generalized Second Law, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 024038, [ 0910.5751]

    2010 arXiv

  119. [127]

    A. C. Wall, The Generalized Second Law implies a Quantum Singularity Theorem , Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 165003, [ 1010.5513]

    2013 arXiv

  120. [128]

    A. C. Wall, A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 104049, [ 1105.3445]

    2012 arXiv

  121. [129]

    A. C. Wall, Testing the Generalized Second Law in 1+1 dimensional Conformal Vacua: An Argument for the Causal Horizon , Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 024015, [ 1105.3520]

    2012 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Bousso and N

    R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, Proof of a New Area Law in General Relativity , Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 044031, [ 1504.07660]. – 58 –

    2015 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Bousso and N

    R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, New Area Law in General Relativity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 081301, [ 1504.07627]

    2015 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Bousso, Z

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A. C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 064044, [ 1506.02669]

    2016 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Bousso, Z

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A. C. Wall, Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 024017, [ 1509.02542]

    2016 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Bousso and N

    R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, Generalized Second Law for Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 024025, [ 1510.02099]

    2016 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Engelhardt and A

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, Decoding the Apparent Horizon: Coarse-Grained Holographic Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 211301, [ 1706.02038]

    2018 arXiv

  128. [136]

    A. C. Wall, A Survey of Black Hole Thermodynamics , 1804.10610

    arXiv

  129. [137]

    Bousso, Y

    R. Bousso, Y. Nomura and G. N. Remmen, Outer Entropy and Quasilocal Energy , Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 046002, [ 1812.06987]

    2019 arXiv

  130. [138]

    T. M. Fiola, J. Preskill, A. Strominger and S. P. Trivedi, Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two-dimensions , Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 3987–4014, [ hep-th/9403137]

    1994 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B424 (1994) 443–467, [ hep-th/9403108]

    1994 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Engelhardt and A

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime , JHEP 01 (2015) 073, [ 1408.3203]

    2015 arXiv

  133. [141]

    S. P. Trivedi, Semiclassical extremal black holes , Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 4233–4238, [hep-th/9211011]

    1993 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , 1905.08255

    G. Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , 1905.08255

    1905 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole , 1905.08762

    1905 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, to appear, 2019

    2019

  137. [145]

    P. C. W. Davies, S. A. Fulling and W. G. Unruh, Energy Momentum Tensor Near an Evaporating Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 2720–2723

    1976

  138. [146]

    S. M. Christensen and S. A. Fulling, Trace Anomalies and the Hawking Effect , Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2088–2104

    1977

  139. [147]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984, 10.1017/CBO9780511622632

    1984 doi

  140. [148]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The Holographic Weyl anomaly , JHEP 07 (1998) 023, [hep-th/9806087]

    1998 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413–428, [ hep-th/9902121]

    1999 arXiv

  142. [150]

    R. C. Myers, Stress tensors and Casimir energies in the AdS / CFT correspondence , Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 046002, [ hep-th/9903203]

    1999 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Emparan, C

    R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, Surface terms as counterterms in the AdS / CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 104001, [ hep-th/9903238]. – 59 –

    1999 arXiv

  144. [152]

    R. B. Mann, Entropy of rotating Misner string space-times , Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 084013, [hep-th/9904148]

    2000 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Kraus, F

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen and R. Siebelink, The gravitational action in asymptotically AdS and flat space-times, Nucl. Phys. B563 (1999) 259–278, [ hep-th/9906127]

    1999 arXiv

  146. [154]

    de Haro, S

    S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence , Commun. Math. Phys. 217 (2001) 595–622, [hep-th/0002230]

    2001 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, Holographic renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B631 (2002) 159–194, [ hep-th/0112119]

    2002 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class

    K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849–5876, [hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

    2007 doi

  150. [158]

    C. P. Herzog, K.-W. Huang and K. Jensen, Universal Entanglement and Boundary Geometry in Conformal Field Theory , JHEP 01 (2016) 162, [ 1510.00021]. – 60 –

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.