On a possible nonequilibrium imprint in the cosmic background at low frequencies

Carlo Burigana; Christian Maes; Gianmaria Falasco; Lamberto Rondoni; Livia Conti; Marco Baiesi; Tiziana Trombetti

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

On a possible nonequilibrium imprint in the cosmic background at low frequencies

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The low-frequency cosmic background excess may be a nonequilibrium echo of the primordial plasma.

desk verdict A genuinely new mechanism (1/ν turbulent diffusion in the Kompaneets equation) wrapped around a useful data compilation, but the central scaling rests on an assumed decorrelation rate that no plasma model grounds — worth refereeing, not desk-rejecting. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08876 v4 pith:Y4QV6U6A submitted 2019-08-23 astro-ph.CO cond-mat.stat-mech

Marco Baiesi , Carlo Burigana , Livia Conti , Gianmaria Falasco , Christian Maes , Lamberto Rondoni , Tiziana Trombetti This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.COcond-mat.stat-mech

keywords cosmicmicrowavebackgroundlow-frequencyexcessspaceroarKompaneetsequationstochasticaccelerationnonequilibriumstatisticalmechanicsEinsteinrelationviolationARCADE2

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the unexplained low-frequency rise in the cosmic background radiation, often called the 'space roar', is a real cosmological signal rather than a foreground artifact. Its cause, the authors propose, is a stochastic frequency-diffusion process in the turbulent primordial plasma: random force kicks make photons drift toward lower frequencies, an effect absent from the standard equilibrium treatment. Adding this effect to the Kompaneets equation breaks the Einstein relation between diffusion and friction and yields a stationary spectrum with temperature $T(\nu)=T_*[1+(\nu/\nu_0)^{-\alpha}]$, $\alpha\simeq 3$. With only $\nu_0$ (and optionally $\alpha$) as free parameters, this curve fits the absolute temperature measurements of the cosmic background from about 20 MHz upward. If correct, the low-frequency excess is a nonequilibrium imprint left by the early universe's plasma.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified Kompaneets equation, the standard kinetic equation that describes how photons thermalize via Compton scattering off hot electrons. The paper adds to it a frequency-space diffusion term of the form $\partial_\tau n \supset \frac{1}{\nu^2}\partial_\nu\{\nu^2 \frac{k_B T_*}{h}B(\nu)\partial_\nu n\}$ with $B(\nu)\propto \nu^{-1}$ for $\nu\gg \nu_1$. The power $-1$ comes from a central-limit argument: if the random force on an electron decorrelates at a rate $\tau^{-1}\propto \nu_i + v/\ell$, the variance of the photon frequency kick scales as $1/\nu_i$, so low-frequency photons diffuse the most. Combined with the inherent $\nu^4$ low-frequency localization of the standard Kompaneets equation, this drives photons into a non-Planckian stationary distribution whose low-frequency density follows a modified Rayleigh-Jeans law $\rho_{mRJ}(\nu)\propto \nu^{1-\alpha}$. The same structure, diffusion without compensating friction, is the mechanism that populates the soft-photon tail.

What would settle it

A clean measurement of the absolute sky brightness in the currently unobserved 0.1–0.4 GHz band, using the same extragalactic foreground subtraction as the paper, would settle it: if the background follows $T(\nu)\simeq T_*[1+(\nu/\nu_0)^{-\alpha}]$ with $\nu_0\simeq 0.3$–$0.4$ GHz and $\alpha\simeq 3$, the temperature near 0.2 GHz should be tens of kelvin, while a synchrotron-limited or flatter spectrum would fall well below that. Likewise, finding no rise or a flattening below 20 MHz would contradict the predicted $1/\nu$ diffusion tail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central proposal is that the standard Kompaneets equation, which relaxes photons toward a Planck blackbody by Compton scattering, is incomplete at low frequencies. The authors add a purely diffusive term with diffusivity $B(\nu)\propto \nu^{-1}$, the analogue in frequency space of stochastic acceleration of charged particles by turbulent fields. Because this extra diffusion does not carry a matching friction, the Einstein relation is violated, and the stationary occupation number becomes non-Planckian: $n_s(\nu)=1/(e^{\varphi(\nu)}-1)$ with $\varphi(\nu)\simeq \frac{h\nu}{k_B T_*}\frac{(\nu/\nu_0)^\alpha}{1+(\nu/\nu_0)^\alpha}$, corresponding to an effective temperature $T(\nu)=T_*[1+(\nu/\nu_0)^{-\alpha}]$. The predicted exponent $\alpha\simeq 3$ reproduces the measured excess, with best-fit $\nu_0\simeq 0.35$–$0.42$ GHz and $\alpha\simeq 3.3$ when left free. The paper reads the observed 'space roar' as a nonequilibrium echo of the primordial plasma.

Load-bearing premise

The whole low-frequency boost rests on the assumption that the random force on an electron decorrelates at a rate that grows with the photon frequency, making the variance of each frequency kick scale as $1/\nu$; the paper presents this as a statistical heuristic and concedes that the detailed plasma mechanism is unknown.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The low-frequency radio excess observed by ARCADE 2 and implied by the EDGES 21-cm absorption would be a cosmological nonequilibrium signal, not an unresolved foreground.
The primordial plasma cannot be assumed to have been in global thermal equilibrium around one second after the Big Bang; the low-frequency photon modes carried a nonequilibrium, near-stationary occupation.
The background's effective temperature rises steeply below about 1 GHz, following $T(\nu)\approx T_*[1+(\nu/\nu_0)^{-\alpha}]$, so the excess grows roughly as $\nu^{-3}$ at the lowest frequencies.
The unobserved bands near 0.1–0.4 GHz and below 20 MHz are where the model makes its sharpest, most falsifiable predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the mechanism is generic stochastic acceleration, the same $1/\nu$ frequency diffusion should appear in other strongly turbulent plasmas, so analogous soft-photon excesses might be sought in settings such as cluster radio halos or the solar corona.
The paper's own energy-integrals appendix implies that for $\alpha\ge 3$ the total photon energy diverges unless a low-frequency cutoff or flattening exists; measuring the spectrum well below 20 MHz would therefore probe that cutoff rather than merely confirm the tail.
Because the stationary solution depends only on frequency, the model predicts an isotropic excess; comparing sky maps at a single low frequency would separate this prediction from anisotropic astrophysical foregrounds.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: this paper has a genuinely new mechanism and a useful data compilation, but the load-bearing step — where the 1/ν diffusion law comes from — is an assumed decorrelation rate, not a derived plasma result. To its credit, the paper says so itself: the detailed mechanism "cannot be provided at this point" and its origin "can only be thought to reside ultimately with gravitational degrees of freedom."

The genuinely new piece is the extra turbulent frequency-diffusion term B(ν) ∝ 1/ν in the Kompaneets equation, which breaks the Einstein relation and gives a stationary T(ν) = T_*[1+(ν/ν0)^{-α}] with α ≈ 3 that tracks the low-frequency cosmic background excess down to ~20 MHz. The blowtorch framing — low-frequency localization plus a broken Einstein relation pumps photons toward low ν — is a clean way to see why such a term would do this. The updated data compilation in Table I, with two extragalactic subtraction models for the low-frequency points, is the most reusable part. The fixed-α=3 fit is reported honestly (reduced χ² ≈ 2.1), and Appendix B gives a quantitative treatment of the low-frequency divergence and the cutoff it requires.

The soft spots, in proportion. The big one: the derivation of B(ν) ∝ 1/ν rests entirely on the assumed decorrelation rate τ^{-1} ∝ ν_i in Eqs. (6)-(8). If that rate is set by plasma frequency or collision time instead, you do not get the 1/ν law and the match to the data stops being a consequence of the mechanism. The stress-test note is right about this, though its "eliminates the enhancement" phrasing is a step too strong — a constant B would give a shallower ν^{-2}-type tail, so the fit would fail rather than the mechanism vanish. Second: the power-law family is data-informed (the introduction already cites a "best fit ν^{-1.3}"), so the agreement is not an independent prediction; the α=3 anchor is a real prediction, but a loose one. Third: the fit is adequate, not excellent, and uses the approximation (16) rather than the exact stationary solution, though the asymptotics match. Minor, as the reader says.

This is a paper for people working on the ARCADE 2/EDGES excess and CMB spectral distortions — the data table will get reused, and the mechanism deserves to be in the conversation of proposed explanations. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject: the referee's key question is whether the decorrelation scaling can be anchored in plasma physics, and if not, the paper should remain a clearly-labeled phenomenological proposal. I would send it out.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper addresses the low-frequency excess in the cosmic background radiation (the 'space roar') by proposing a nonequilibrium modification of the Kompaneets equation. The authors add a purely diffusive term in photon-frequency space, B(ν)∝1/ν, argued from a central-limit scaling argument for stochastic acceleration in a random force field. The resulting stationary occupation number yields an effective brightness temperature T(ν)=T_*[1+(ν/ν0)^(-α)] with α≈3, which is fitted to an updated compilation of absolute temperature measurements from 22 MHz to about 600 GHz. The authors report good qualitative agreement with α fixed to 3 (reduced χ²≈2.1) and slightly better with α free (α≈3.3, χ²≈1.9), and interpret the excess as a nonequilibrium echo of the primordial plasma. The paper provides a useful data compilation and a transparent, testable functional form, but the physical derivation of the 1/ν diffusivity is the key unsupported step.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism were correct, the paper would offer a novel explanation for a long-standing observational anomaly, with a falsifiable prediction (a power-law temperature excess T∝ν^(-α), α≈3) that can be tested by future low-frequency measurements. The updated data compilation is a useful community resource, and the connection to nonequilibrium statistical mechanics (Einstein-relation violation, blowtorch theorem) is conceptually interesting. However, the central claim is conditional: the predicted 1/ν scaling is inherited from an assumed decorrelation rate τ^{-1}∝ν_i that is not derived from a plasma model, and the fits use an approximation to the model's stationary solution. The model's contribution is therefore best regarded as a proof-of-concept that a broad class of non-equilibrium frequency-diffusion processes can mimic the radio excess, rather than as an established explanation.

major comments (3)

[Section IV, Eqs. (6)-(8)] The central result B(ν)∝1/ν is obtained by assuming the decorrelation rate τ^{-1}∝ν_i+v/ℓ and then retaining only the ν_i term. This is the load-bearing step: without τ∝1/ν_i, Eq. (8) gives a variance independent of ν_i and the low-frequency enhancement disappears. The manuscript does not derive this rate from any concrete plasma or field model; the Introduction states that 'details on the precise mechanism cannot be provided at this point' and that the origin 'can only be thought to reside ultimately with gravitational degrees of freedom.' The spatial term v/ℓ is also not estimated: for the ν_i term to dominate, one needs ℓ ≫ v/ν_i, which is a nontrivial assumption about the force-field correlation length. The authors should either supply a physical model for τ or explicitly identify the 1/ν scaling as an assumption; in the latter case, the data fit is a test of the assumed form, not of the proposed statistical mechanism.
[Section V, Eq. (16) and Fig. 1] The fits do not use the model defined by Eqs. (10)-(14). The exact stationary solution of (10)-(14) has φ(ν)=∫dν' γ(ν')/D(ν'), given by a hypergeometric function, while Eq. (16) replaces it with φ(ν)=(hν/k_BT_e)(ν/ν0)^α/[1+(ν/ν0)^α], which has the same asymptotics but differs in the crossover region. Because the crossover region is precisely where the data (roughly 0.4-3 GHz) constrain the model, the best-fit values of ν0 and α and the reported reduced χ² may change when the exact model is used. The authors should fit the exact stationary solution, or quantify the error introduced by (16), before claiming quantitative agreement.
[Section V, Fig. 1 and Appendix A] The fixed-α=3 fit has reduced χ²≈2.1 and the two-parameter fit has reduced χ²≈1.9. For a model presented as predicting the observed spectrum, these values indicate a statistically poor fit: with the quoted 1σ errors, the probability of obtaining χ²_red≥2.1 is very small if the model is correct. The paper attributes the excess to systematic differences between data sets, but no quantitative treatment is provided. The authors should include a residual analysis, allow for a variance floor or nuisance parameters to absorb relative systematics, and state explicitly whether the agreement is qualitative or quantitative. As written, the claim that the model reproduces the data 'down to about 20 MHz' is not supported at the quoted error level.

minor comments (4)

[Appendix A, Table I] Some rows of Table I are difficult to parse because the columns run together (for example, the 0.022 GHz row); the table should be reformatted with clearly separated columns or presented in machine-readable form.
[Section IV, after Eq. (11)] The parameter ν1 is introduced as the lower limit of validity of B(ν)∝1/ν, but the bound ν1<10^{-2} GHz is stated without derivation; a brief explanation of how this bound is obtained from the data or from the model would improve clarity.
[Section V, after Eq. (17)] The mapping of the early-universe stationary solution to the present epoch under cosmological expansion should be made explicit; in particular, the parameter ν0 in Eq. (17) should be identified as the present-day crossover frequency, and the redshift dependence of ν0 should be stated.
[Introduction, p. 2] The phrase 'best fit, ν^{-1.3}' in the Introduction anticipates the fit results before the model is derived; rephrasing this to avoid the appearance of post hoc tuning would strengthen the presentation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The predicted low-frequency excess is substantially built in: the 1/ν diffusivity follows only from an assumed τ^{-1}∝ν_i decorrelation rate, and the matching stationary spectrum is fitted to the same data that motivated the model.

fitted input called prediction [Section I (Introduction) and Section IV, Eqs. (6)-(11); fitted spectrum in Section V, Eqs. (13)-(17)]
"Quite independent of the detailed mechanism, the central limit theorem gives an extra contribution to the diffusivity ∝ ν−1 (best ﬁt, ν−1.3) to be added to the standard diffusive contribution ∝ ν2 ... In particular, from (7) and with τ−1 growing proportional to νi, we expect a variance ⟨|hνϵ−hνi|2⟩∝ 1/νi ϵ."

The central limit theorem alone does not produce the 1/ν diffusivity: Eq. (7) gives a variance proportional to the persistence time τ, and the 1/ν scaling in Eq. (8) is entirely inherited from the assumed decorrelation rate τ^{-1}∝ν_i (plus v/ℓ). That assumption is not derived from any plasma model; the paper concedes that 'details on the precise mechanism cannot be provided at this point' and attributes the origin ultimately to gravitational degrees of freedom. The stationary spectrum (17), T(ν)=T_*[1+(ν/ν0)^{-α}], is then fitted to the same low-frequency data that motivated the model: with α free the best fit is α≈3.3, while fixing α=3 gives reduced χ²≈2.1.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: assume τ^{-1}∝ν_i → variance ∝1/ν_i (Eq. 8) → B(ν)∝1/ν (Eq. 11) → stationary solution T(ν)=T_*[1+(ν/ν0)^{-α}] with α=3 (Eqs. 13-17). The key step is not an external first-principles result; the 1/ν form is a direct consequence of the assumed decorrelation-rate scaling, and the introduction already identifies the empirical best-fit diffusivity exponent as ν^{-1.3}. The subsequent fit of ν0 and α to the compiled low-frequency data therefore re-encodes the same excess that motivated the model. This is a partial circularity: the model is flexible enough to accommodate the observed power-law-like excess, and the fixed-α=3 version is only marginally worse than the free fit. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present; the self-citations to the blowtorch theorem and kappa-distribution work are analogies, not the derivation. The paper is transparent about the missing mechanism, which is why the circularity is partial rather than total. The independent content is mostly in the specific functional form with a crossover and the one-parameter fixed-α fit, but the central claim of agreement is substantially fitted input called prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model adds two fitted parameters, ν0 and α, and relies on an ad hoc assumption of a random non-conservative force field with decorrelation rate scaling with photon frequency. No new particles or forces are introduced; the turbulent diffusion term is a postulated kinetic effect.

free parameters (2)

ν0 (crossover frequency) = 0.42 ± 0.04 GHz (α=3, panel a); 0.40 ± 0.05 GHz (α=3, panel b); 0.38 ± 0.05 GHz (α free, panel a); 0.35 ± 0.06 GHz (α…
Sets the frequency below which the added turbulent diffusion B(ν)∝1/ν dominates over the thermal ν^2 diffusivity. Not predicted by the theory; fitted to the data.
α (low-frequency power-law index) = 3.30 ± 0.22 (panel a); 3.36 ± 0.28 (panel b); 2.55 ± 0.10 (smaller dataset); fixed at 3 for the theory-motivated fit
Controls the slope of the low-frequency temperature rise, T(ν)∝ν^{-α}. The central-limit argument suggests α=3, but α is also fit as a free parameter, and the free fit gives a slightly larger value.

assumptions (5)

standard math Compton scattering kinetics of photons on non-relativistic electrons is described by the Kompaneets equation (1).
Taken from the literature [12, 51-53]; the paper cites the derivation rather than rederiving it.
domain assumption The electron temperature follows Te(z)=T_*(1+z) and the standard Kompaneets equation has the Planck law as stationary solution.
Standard cosmology; used to set the equilibrium baseline spectrum in Section III.
ad hoc to paper In the primordial plasma there exists a random, non-conservative force field F whose decorrelation rate scales as τ^{-1}∝ν_i + v/ℓ, with ν_i the photon frequency.
This is the key assumption used in Eqs. (6)-(8) to derive the variance ∝1/ν_i of frequency kicks. Not derived from a concrete plasma model; the paper admits the detailed mechanism is unknown.
ad hoc to paper The additional frequency diffusion has no compensating drift, so the Einstein relation D(ν)/γ(ν)=k_B T_e/h is broken by the additive term B(ν)∝1/ν in Eq. (10).
The choice of a purely diffusive nonequilibrium term, with unchanged friction γ(ν)=ν^2, is the modeling step that produces the low-frequency photon abundance.
domain assumption Other photon production and absorption processes (double Compton, bremsstrahlung, cyclotron) are neglected in the modified equation.
Stated in Section III; these processes would in near-equilibrium restore the Planck spectrum and could alter the stationary solution.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On a possible nonequilibrium imprint in the cosmic background at low frequencies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y4QV6U6A

@misc{pith2026190808876,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On a possible nonequilibrium imprint in the cosmic background at low frequencies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y4QV6U6A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08876}
}

abstract

The cosmic background radiation has been observed to deviate from the Planck law expected from a blackbody at $\sim$ 2.7 K at frequencies below $\sim 3$ GHz. We discuss the abundance of the low-energy photons from the perspective of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. We propose a mechanism of stochastic frequency-diffusion, the counterpart to stochastic acceleration for charged particles in a turbulent plasma, to modify the standard Kompaneets equation. The resulting violation of the Einstein relation allows to take advantage of low-frequency localization and finally leads to photon cooling. The new equation predicts a frequency distribution in agreement with the absolute temperature measurements of the cosmic background radiation down to about 20 MHz, for which we offer here an updated compilation. In that sense, the so called 'space roar' we observe today is interpreted as a nonequilibrium echo of the early universe, and of nonequilibrium conditions in the primordial plasma more specifically.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08876 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Cosmic background absolute temperature as function of the frequency (in GHz). The experimental data (black dots with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** For the parameters resulting from the fit of the data set in column (a) of Table I with both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Cosmic background absolute temperature as function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Predictions for the diffuse cosmic dipole at radio frequencies from reionization imprints
astro-ph.CO 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The kinematic dipole of diffuse radio backgrounds, including the 21cm line and free-free emission, encodes the monopole spectrum and can probe reionization without absolute calibration.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

condensed

The data listed in Table 1 of the ARCADE 2 data in- terpretation paper [10], but not the FIRAS “condensed” data at 250 GHz)
[2]

The data compilation from the various experiments re- ported in Table 1 of [30] where joint constraints on early and late CMB spectral distortions were presented
[3]

The measurements by the TRIS experiment together with the long wavelength compilation in Table 1 re- ported in [31]
[4]

We take from [7] the measure- ments at the ﬁve lowest FIRAS frequencies while the results in [32] are used above 68 GHz

The extremely accurate measurements by FIRAS on board COBE [7, 32]. We take from [7] the measure- ments at the ﬁve lowest FIRAS frequencies while the results in [32] are used above 68 GHz. A little rescaling is applied to the FIRAS data to account for the last abso- lute temperature calibration by [33] atT∗ = 2.72548 K. We do not include the data by the C...
[5]

They refer to the extragalactic signal without any subtraction of the known contribution by extragalactic sources, that we perform as described below

The recent data between 0.04 GHz and 0.08 GHz by [34]. They refer to the extragalactic signal without any subtraction of the known contribution by extragalactic sources, that we perform as described below. Note that the value adopted by the authors for the extragalactic background temperature at 408 MHz is consistent with 3 the one in Table 1 of [10], but...
[6]

Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravita- tional lensing,

Planck Collaboration, “Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravita- tional lensing,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1807.06210 (2018), arXiv:1807.06210 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2018
[7]

In the case of the data by [34] we perform the sub- traction using both the recipe by [35] and this higher model

was applied to subtract the global contribution by un- resolved extragalactic radio sources, as for instance in [10], we report also the background temperature derived applying the higher subtraction described above to account for possible higher differential number counts at faint ﬂux densities (third column). In the case of the data by [34] we perform t...
[8]

ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Absolute Sky Brightness at 3-90 GHz,

D. J. Fixsen, A. Kogut, S. Levin, M. Limon, P. Lubin, P. Mirel, M. Seiffert, J. Singal, E. Wollack, T. Villela, and C. A. Wuensche, “ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Absolute Sky Brightness at 3-90 GHz,” Astrophys. J. 734, 5 (2011), arXiv:0901.0555

arXiv 2011

Show all 126 references

[9]

An absorption proﬁle centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum,

J. D. Bowman, A. E. E. Rogers, R. A. Monsalve, T. J. Mozdzen, and N. Mahesh, “An absorption proﬁle centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum,” Nature (London) 555, 67–70 (2018), arXiv:1810.05912

2018 arXiv
[10]

However, this exponent is close to the value α = 3 predicted in the previous section

and is likely difﬁcult to explain in terms of synchrotron emitters. However, this exponent is close to the value α = 3 predicted in the previous section. As anticipated, an informed breaking of the equilibrium assumption sufﬁces to reproduce qualitatively the low-frequency exc...

2016
[11]

The relic radiation spectrum and the thermal history of the Universe

L. Danese and G. de Zotti, “The relic radiation spectrum and the thermal history of the Universe.” Nuovo Cimento Rivista Serie 7, 277–362 (1977)

1977
[12]

low- frequency

and by Weymann [51]. It is assumed that the energy ex- changes are non-relativistic at electron temperature Te with kBTe≪ mec2 and for photon energies hν≪ mec2. Then, the dimensionless occupation numbern(t,ν ) at timet and fre- quencyν, obtained from the spectral energy densit...
[13]

Unavoidable CMB Spectral Features and Blackbody Photosphere of Our Universe,

R. A. Sunyaev and R. Khatri, “Unavoidable CMB Spectral Features and Blackbody Photosphere of Our Universe,” Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics D 22, 1330014 (2013), arXiv:1302.6553 [astro-ph.CO]

2013 arXiv
[14]

In the beginning: the ﬁrst sources of light and the reionization of the universe,

R. Barkana and A. Loeb, “In the beginning: the ﬁrst sources of light and the reionization of the universe,” Physics Reports 349, 125–238 (2001), astro-ph/0010468

2001 arXiv
[15]

Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB,

A. Lewis and A. Challinor, “Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB,” Physics Reports 429, 1–65 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0601594 [astro-ph]

2006
[16]

Planck intermediate results. XLVII. Planck constraints on reionization history,

Planck Collaboration, “Planck intermediate results. XLVII. Planck constraints on reionization history,” A&A 596, A108 (2016), arXiv:1605.03507 [astro-ph.CO]

2016 arXiv
[17]

A preliminary measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite,

J. C. Mather, E. S. Cheng, R. E. Eplee, Jr., R. B. Isaacman, S. S. Meyer, R. A. Shafer, R. Weiss, E. L. Wright, C. L. Bennett, N. W. Boggess, E. Dwek, S. Gulkis, M. G. Hauser, M. Janssen, T. Kelsall, P. M. Lubin, S. H. Moseley, Jr., T. L. Murdock, R. F. Silverberg, G. F. Smoot...

1990
[18]

Producing suprathermal tails in the stationary velocity distribution,

T. Demaerel, W. De Roeck, and C. Maes, “Producing suprathermal tails in the stationary velocity distribution,” ArXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02312 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[19]

Interpretation of the ARCADE 2 Absolute Sky Brightness Measurement,

M. Seiffert, D. J. Fixsen, A. Kogut, S. M. Levin, M. Limon, P. M. Lubin, P. Mirel, J. Singal, T. Villela, E. Wollack, and C. A. Wuensche, “Interpretation of the ARCADE 2 Absolute Sky Brightness Measurement,” Astrophys. J.734, 6 (2011)

2011
[20]

Possible interaction between baryons and dark- matter particles revealed by the ﬁrst stars,

R. Barkana, “Possible interaction between baryons and dark- matter particles revealed by the ﬁrst stars,” Nature (London) 555, 71–74 (2018), arXiv:1803.06698

2018 arXiv
[21]

The Establishment of Thermal Equilib- rium between Quanta and Electrons,

A. S. Kompaneets, “The Establishment of Thermal Equilib- rium between Quanta and Electrons,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.31, 876 [Sov. Phys. JETP, 4, 730 (1957)] (1956)

1957
[22]

On some statistical properties of dynamical sys- tems,

S. M. Ulam, “On some statistical properties of dynamical sys- tems,” in Proc. 4th Berkeley Sympos. on Math. Statist., and Prob. (Univ. California Press, Berkley, CA, 1961) pp. 315– 320

1961
[23]

Stochastic acceleration,

P. A. Sturrock, “Stochastic acceleration,” Phys. Rev. 41, 186 (1966)

1966
[24]

Classical motion in force ﬁelds with short range correlations,

B. Aguer, S. De Bièvre, P. Laﬁtte, and P. E. Parris, “Classical motion in force ﬁelds with short range correlations,” J. Stat. Phys. 138, 780–814 (2010)

2010
[25]

Nonequilibrium response and frenesy,

U. Basu and C. Maes, “Nonequilibrium response and frenesy,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 638, 012001 (2015)

2015
[26]

Kinetic proofreading: A new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high speci- ﬁcity,

J. J. Hopﬁeld, “Kinetic proofreading: A new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high speci- ﬁcity,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA71, 4135–4139 (1974)

1974
[27]

Effec- tive temperatures of hot brownian motion,

G. Falasco, M. V . Gnann, D. Rings, and K. Kroy, “Effec- tive temperatures of hot brownian motion,” Phys. Rev. E 90, 032131 (2014)

2014
[28]

Inadequacy of entropy and entropy derivatives in characterizing the steady state,

R. Landauer, “Inadequacy of entropy and entropy derivatives in characterizing the steady state,” Phys. Rev. A 12, 636–638 (1975)

1975
[29]

Heat bounds and the blowtorch the- orem,

C. Maes and K. Netoˇcný, “Heat bounds and the blowtorch the- orem,” Annales Henri Poincaré4, 1193–1202 (2013)

2013
[30]

Measuring effective temperatures in out-of-equilibrium driven systems,

R. R. Exartier and L. Peliti, “Measuring effective temperatures in out-of-equilibrium driven systems,” Eur. Phys. J. B16, 119 (2000)

2000
[31]

L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and L. Peliti, “ ,” Physical Re- view E 55, 3898 (1997)

1997
[32]

J. M. Ortiz de Zarate and J. V . Sengers, Hydrodynamic Fluc- tuations in Fluids and Fluid Mixtures (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006)

2006
[33]

Nonequilibrium and information: The role of cross correlations,

A. Crisanti, A. Puglisi, and D. Villamaina, “Nonequilibrium and information: The role of cross correlations,” Phys. Rev. E 85, 061127 (2012), arXiv:1202.0508 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2012 arXiv
[34]

Out-of-equilibrium col- lective oscillation as phonon condensation in a model protein,

I. Nardecchia, J. Torres, M. Lechelon, V . Giliberti, M. Or- tolani, P. Nouvel, M. Gori, Y . Meriguet, I. Donato, J. Preto, L. Varani, J. Sturgis, and M. Pettini, “Out-of-equilibrium col- lective oscillation as phonon condensation in a model protein,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 031061 (2018)

2018
[35]

Here c, kB, ν, S and N′(ν,S ) are the light speed, the Boltzmann constant, the photon frequency, the source ﬂux density and the source differential number counts

to describe the global contribution by unresolved extra- galactic radio sources, expressed in terms of the antenna tem- perature Tant(ν) = c2/(2ν2kB) ∫Smax Smin SN′(ν,S )dS. Here c, kB, ν, S and N′(ν,S ) are the light speed, the Boltzmann constant, the photon frequency, the so...
[36]

Effects of breaking vibrational energy equiparti- tion on measurements of temperature in macroscopic oscilla- tors subject to heat ﬂux,

L. Conti, P. De Gregorio, G. Karapetyan1, L. C., P. M., B. M., and R. L., “Effects of breaking vibrational energy equiparti- tion on measurements of temperature in macroscopic oscilla- tors subject to heat ﬂux,” JSTAT (2013), P12003

2013
[37]

Energy repartition for a harmonic chain with local reservoirs,

G. Falasco, M. Baiesi, L. Molinaro, L. Conti, and F. Bal- dovin, “Energy repartition for a harmonic chain with local reservoirs,” Phys. Rev. E92, 022129 (2015)

2015
[38]

A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s

A. A. Penzias and R. W. Wilson, “A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s.” Astrophys. J. 142, 419– 421 (1965)

1965
[39]

A joint study of early and late spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background and of the millimetric foreground,

R. Salvaterra and C. Burigana, “A joint study of early and late spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background and of the millimetric foreground,” MNRAS336, 592–610 (2002), astro-ph/0203294

2002 arXiv
[40]

TRIS. II. Search for CMB Spectral Distortions at 0.60, 0.82, and 2.5 GHz,

M. Gervasi, M. Zannoni, A. Tartari, G. Boella, and G. Sironi, “TRIS. II. Search for CMB Spectral Distortions at 0.60, 0.82, and 2.5 GHz,” Astrophys. J. 688, 24-31 (2008), arXiv:0807.4750

2008 arXiv
[41]

The Cosmic Microwave Back- ground Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set,

D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright, “The Cosmic Microwave Back- ground Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set,” As- trophys. J. 473, 576 (1996), astro-ph/9605054

1996 arXiv
[42]

The Temperature of the Cosmic Mi- crowave Background,

D. J. Fixsen, “The Temperature of the Cosmic Mi- crowave Background,” Astrophys. J. 707, 916–920 (2009), arXiv:0911.1955

2009 arXiv
[43]

The Radio Background below 100 MHz,

J. Dowell and G. B. Taylor, “The Radio Background below 100 MHz,” ApJL858, L9 (2018), arXiv:1804.08581. 10

2018 arXiv
[44]

The Contribution of the Unresolved Extragalactic Radio Sources to the Brightness Temperature of the Sky,

M. Gervasi, A. Tartari, M. Zannoni, G. Boella, and G. Sironi, “The Contribution of the Unresolved Extragalactic Radio Sources to the Brightness Temperature of the Sky,” Astrophys. J. 682, 223–230 (2008), arXiv:0803.4138

2008 arXiv
[45]

The Lockman Hole Project: new constraints on the sub-mJy source counts from a wide-area 1.4 GHz mosaic,

I. Prandoni, G. Guglielmino, R. Morganti, M. Vaccari, A. Maini, H. J. A. Röttgering, M. J. Jarvis, and M. A. Garrett, “The Lockman Hole Project: new constraints on the sub-mJy source counts from a wide-area 1.4 GHz mosaic,” MNRAS 481, 4548–4565 (2018), arXiv:1810.03738

2018 arXiv
[46]

Deep LOFAR 150 MHz imaging of the Boötes ﬁeld: Unveiling the faint low-frequency sky,

E. Retana-Montenegro, H. J. A. Röttgering, T. W. Shimwell, R. J. van Weeren, I. Prandoni, G. Brunetti, P. N. Best, and M. Brüggen, “Deep LOFAR 150 MHz imaging of the Boötes ﬁeld: Unveiling the faint low-frequency sky,” A&A 620, A74 (2018), arXiv:1807.04878

2018 arXiv
[47]

Deep 3 GHz number counts from a P(D) ﬂuctuation analysis,

T. Vernstrom, D. Scott, J. V . Wall, J. J. Condon, W. D. Cot- ton, E. B. Fomalont, K. I. Kellermann, N. Miller, and R. A. Perley, “Deep 3 GHz number counts from a P(D) ﬂuctuation analysis,” MNRAS440, 2791–2809 (2014), arXiv:1311.7451

2014 arXiv
[48]

Deep 3-GHz observa- tions of the Lockman Hole North with the Very Large Array - II. Catalogue andµJy source properties,

T. Vernstrom, D. Scott, J. V . Wall, J. J. Condon, W. D. Cotton, K. I. Kellermann, and R. A. Perley, “Deep 3-GHz observa- tions of the Lockman Hole North with the Very Large Array - II. Catalogue andµJy source properties,” MNRAS462, 2934– 2949 (2016), arXiv:1603.03085

2016 arXiv
[49]

Semi-analytical description of clumping factor and cosmic microwave background free- free distortions from reionization,

T. Trombetti and C. Burigana, “Semi-analytical description of clumping factor and cosmic microwave background free- free distortions from reionization,” MNRAS 437, 2507–2520 (2014), arXiv:1310.6177

2014 arXiv
[50]

Observational Signatures of the First Luminous Ob- jects,

S. P. Oh, “Observational Signatures of the First Luminous Ob- jects,” Astrophys. J.527, 16–30 (1999), astro-ph/9904255

1999 arXiv
[51]

Possibility of a dark matter interpretation for the excess in isotropic radio emission reported by arcade,

N. Fornengo, R. Lineros, M. Regis, and M. Taoso, “Possibility of a dark matter interpretation for the excess in isotropic radio emission reported by arcade,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 271302 (2011)

2011
[52]

Cosmic backgrounds due to the formation of the ﬁrst generation of supermassive black holes,

P. L. Biermann, B. B. Nath, L. I. Caramete, B. C. Harms, T. Stanev, and J. Becker Tjus, “Cosmic backgrounds due to the formation of the ﬁrst generation of supermassive black holes,” MNRAS 441, 1147–1156 (2014), arXiv:1403.3804 [astro-ph.CO]

2014 arXiv
[53]

Enhanced Global Signal of Neutral Hydrogen Due to Excess Radiation at Cosmic Dawn,

C. Feng and G. Holder, “Enhanced Global Signal of Neutral Hydrogen Due to Excess Radiation at Cosmic Dawn,” ApJL 858, L17 (2018), arXiv:1802.07432

2018 arXiv
[54]

Modeling the Radio Background from the First Black Holes at Cosmic Dawn: Implications for the 21 cm Absorption Amplitude,

A. Ewall-Wice, T.-C. Chang, J. Lazio, O. Doré, M. Seiffert, and R. A. Monsalve, “Modeling the Radio Background from the First Black Holes at Cosmic Dawn: Implications for the 21 cm Absorption Amplitude,” Astrophys. J. 868, 63 (2018), arXiv:1803.01815

2018 arXiv
[55]

Black Hole High Mass X-ray Binary Microquasars at Cosmic Dawn,

I. F. Mirabel, “Black Hole High Mass X-ray Binary Microquasars at Cosmic Dawn,” arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1902.00511 [astro-ph.HE]

2019 arXiv
[56]

Is there an Unaccounted for Excess in the Extragalactic Cosmic Radio Background?

R. Subrahmanyan and R. Cowsik, “Is there an Unaccounted for Excess in the Extragalactic Cosmic Radio Background?” Astrophys. J. 776, 42 (2013), arXiv:1305.7060

2013 arXiv
[57]

Concerns about modelling of the EDGES data,

R. Hills, G. Kulkarni, P. D. Meerburg, and E. Puchwein, “Concerns about modelling of the EDGES data,” Nature (Lon- don) 564, E32–E34 (2018)

2018
[58]

Astrophysical radio background cannot ex- plain the EDGES 21-cm signal: constraints from cooling of non-thermal electrons,

P. Sharma, “Astrophysical radio background cannot ex- plain the EDGES 21-cm signal: constraints from cooling of non-thermal electrons,” MNRAS 481, L6–L10 (2018), arXiv:1804.05843 [astro-ph.HE]

2018 arXiv
[59]

The Redshifted 21 cm Sig- nal in the EDGES Low-band Spectrum,

S. Singh and R. Subrahmanyan, “The Redshifted 21 cm Sig- nal in the EDGES Low-band Spectrum,” Astrophys. J.880, 26 (2019), arXiv:1903.04540 [astro-ph.CO]

2019 arXiv
[60]

Diffusion approximation for a photon gas in- teracting with a plasma via the compton effect,

R. Weymann, “Diffusion approximation for a photon gas in- teracting with a plasma via the compton effect,” Phys. Fluids 8, 2112 (1965)

1965
[61]

G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman, Radiative Processes in As- trophysics (Wiley Interscience, 1979)

1979
[62]

J. I. Katz, High Energy Astrophysics, Frontiers in Physics Lec- ture Note Series (Addison-Wesley, 1987)

1987
[63]

C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences , 3rd ed., Springer Series in Synergetics, V ol. 13 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004)

2004
[64]

Formation and evo- lution of early distortions of the microwave background spec- trum - A numerical study,

C. Burigana, L. Danese, and G. de Zotti, “Formation and evo- lution of early distortions of the microwave background spec- trum - A numerical study,” A&A246, 49–58 (1991)

1991
[65]

Double Compton emission in radiation dom- inated thermal plasmas,

A. P. Lightman, “Double Compton emission in radiation dom- inated thermal plasmas,” Astrophys. J.244, 392–405 (1981)

1981
[66]

Double Compton process and the spectrum of the microwave background,

L. Danese and G. de Zotti, “Double Compton process and the spectrum of the microwave background,” A&A 107, 39–42 (1982)

1982
[67]

The cross section for double Compton scatter- ing,

R. J. Gould, “The cross section for double Compton scatter- ing,” Astrophys. J.285, 275–278 (1984)

1984
[68]

Electron Radiative Transitions in a Coulomb Field

W. J. Karzas and R. Latter, “Electron Radiative Transitions in a Coulomb Field.” ApJS 6, 167 (1961)

1961
[69]

G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics, by George B. Rybicki, Alan P . Lightman, pp. 400. ISBN 0-471-82759-2. Wiley-VCH , June 1986. (Wi- ley, 1986) p. 400

1986
[70]

On the effect of cyclotron emis- sion on the spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave back- ground,

A. Zizzo and C. Burigana, “On the effect of cyclotron emis- sion on the spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave back- ground,” New Astronomy11, 1–16 (2005), astro-ph/0505259

2005 arXiv
[71]

The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe,

J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev, “The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe,” MNRAS 419, 1294–1314 (2012), arXiv:1109.6552

2012 arXiv
[72]

Quantum-mechanical perturbations giving rise to a statistical transport equation,

L. van Hove, “Quantum-mechanical perturbations giving rise to a statistical transport equation,” Physica 21, 517–540 (1955)

1955
[73]

The approach to equilibrium in quantum statis- tics: A perturbation treatment to general order,

L. Van Hove, “The approach to equilibrium in quantum statis- tics: A perturbation treatment to general order,” Physica 23, 441–480 (1957)

1957
[74]

On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation,

E. Fermi, “On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation,” Physical Review 75, 1169–1174 (1949)

1949
[75]

Diffusion by continuous movements,

G. I. Taylor, “Diffusion by continuous movements,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 20, 196–212 (1922)

1922
[76]

Non-equilibrium steady states for chains of four rotors,

J. Eckman and N. Cuneo, “Non-equilibrium steady states for chains of four rotors,” Commun. Math. Phys. 345, 185–221 (2016)

2016
[77]

Energy dissipa- tion in hamiltonian chains of rotators,

N. Cuneo, J. Eckmann, and C. E. Wayne, “Energy dissipa- tion in hamiltonian chains of rotators,” Nonlinearity 30, R81 (2017)

2017
[78]

Dynamical freezing of relaxation to equilibrium,

S. Iubini, L. Chirondojan, G. L. Oppo, A. Politi, and P. Polito, “Dynamical freezing of relaxation to equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 084102 (2019)

2019
[79]

Grimmett and D

G. Grimmett and D. Stirzaker, Probability and random pro- cesses, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Great Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)

1992
[80]

Penrose, The road to reality: a complete guide to the laws of the universe (Vintage Books, London, 2005)

R. Penrose, The road to reality: a complete guide to the laws of the universe (Vintage Books, London, 2005)

2005
[81]

Compton scattering in a plasma

L. S. Brown, “Compton scattering in a plasma.” Annals of Physics 200, 190–205 (1990)

1990
[82]

Induced compton scattering by thermal elec- trons and the low-frequency spectrum of radio sources,

R. A. Sunyaev, “Induced compton scattering by thermal elec- trons and the low-frequency spectrum of radio sources,” Soviet Astronomy 15, 190 (1971)

1971
[83]

Avalanche photon cooling by induced Compton scattering: Higher-order Kom- paneets equation,

S. J. Tanaka, K. Asano, and T. Terasawa, “Avalanche photon cooling by induced Compton scattering: Higher-order Kom- paneets equation,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimen- tal Physics 2015, 073E01 (2015), arXiv:1505.06541 [astro- ph.HE]. 11

2015 arXiv
[84]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolog- ical parameters,

Planck Collaboration, “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolog- ical parameters,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1807.06209 (2018), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

2018 arXiv
[85]

The radio emission from the Galaxy at 22 MHz,

R. S. Roger, C. H. Costain, T. L. Landecker, and C. M. Swerd- lyk, “The radio emission from the Galaxy at 22 MHz,” A&AS 137, 7–19 (1999)

1999
[86]

A 45- MHz continuum survey of the northern hemisphere,

K. Maeda, H. Alvarez, J. Aparici, J. May, and P. Reich, “A 45- MHz continuum survey of the northern hemisphere,” A&AS 140, 145–154 (1999)

1999
[87]

A 408 MHz all-sky continuum survey. I - Observations at southern declinations and for the North Polar region

C. G. T. Haslam, U. Klein, C. J. Salter, H. Stoffel, W. E. Wil- son, M. N. Cleary, D. J. Cooke, and P. Thomasson, “A 408 MHz all-sky continuum survey. I - Observations at southern declinations and for the North Polar region.” A&A 100, 209– 219 (1981)

1981
[88]

A radio continuum survey of the northern sky at 1420 MHz. II,

P. Reich and W. Reich, “A radio continuum survey of the northern sky at 1420 MHz. II,” A&AS63, 205 (1986)

1986
[89]

Spectrum of the 3° K Cos- mic Microwave Radiation,

T. F. Howell and J. R. Shakeshaft, “Spectrum of the 3° K Cos- mic Microwave Radiation,” Nature (London) 216, 753–754 (1967)

1967
[90]

Ra- dio sky background studies using the Moon as a screen,

K. S. Stankevich, R. Wielebinski, and W. E. Wilson, “Ra- dio sky background studies using the Moon as a screen,” Aus- tralian Journal of Physics 23, 529 (1970)

1970
[91]

Absolute Tempera- ture Measurements of the Cosmic Radio Emission of the Sky in the Decimeter Range

S. A. Pelyushenko and K. S. Stankevich, “Absolute Tempera- ture Measurements of the Cosmic Radio Emission of the Sky in the Decimeter Range.” Soviet Astronomy 13, 223 (1969)

1969
[92]

A measurement of the back- ground temperature at 1415 MHz,

A. A. Penzias and R. W. Wilson, “A measurement of the back- ground temperature at 1415 MHz,” AJ72, 315 (1967)

1967
[93]

Measurement of the Minimum Cosmic Background Radiation at 20.7-cm Wave- Length,

T. F. Howell and J. R. Shakeshaft, “Measurement of the Minimum Cosmic Background Radiation at 20.7-cm Wave- Length,” Nature (London)210, 1318–1319 (1966)

1966
[94]

Cosmic Background Noise Temperature Measurements at 13-cm Wavelength,

T. Y . Otoshi and C. T. Stelzreid, “Cosmic Background Noise Temperature Measurements at 13-cm Wavelength,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 24, 174 (1975)

1975
[95]

Cosmic Background Radi- ation at 3.2 cm-Support for Cosmic Black-Body Radiation,

P. G. Roll and D. T. Wilkinson, “Cosmic Background Radi- ation at 3.2 cm-Support for Cosmic Black-Body Radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 405–407 (1966)

1966
[96]

New Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background at λ=3.2 cm andλ=1.58 cm-Evidence in Support of a Blackbody Spectrum,

R. A. Stokes, R. B. Partridge, and D. T. Wilkinson, “New Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background at λ=3.2 cm andλ=1.58 cm-Evidence in Support of a Blackbody Spectrum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1199–1202 (1967)

1967
[97]

Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Tem- perature at 1.5-cm Wavelength,

W. J. Welch, S. Keachie, D. D. Thornton, and G. Wrixon, “Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Tem- perature at 1.5-cm Wavelength,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1068– 1070 (1967)

1967
[98]

Cosmic Back- ground Measurement at a Wavelength of 9.24 mm,

M. S. Ewing, B. F. Burke, and D. H. Staelin, “Cosmic Back- ground Measurement at a Wavelength of 9.24 mm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1251–1253 (1967)

1967
[99]

Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background at 8.56-mm Wavelength,

D. T. Wilkinson, “Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background at 8.56-mm Wavelength,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1195–1198 (1967)

1967
[100]

Measurements of the Temperature of the Primordial Back- ground Radiation at 8.2-mm Wavelength

V . I. Puzanov, A. E. Salomonovich, and K. S. Stankevich, “Measurements of the Temperature of the Primordial Back- ground Radiation at 8.2-mm Wavelength.” Soviet Astronomy 11, 905 (1968)

1968
[101]

Effective Temperature of Cos- mic Blackbody Radiation at 3.58 mm

A. G. Kislyakov, V . I. Chernyshev, Y . V . Lebskii, V . A. Mal’Tsev, and N. V . Serov, “Effective Temperature of Cos- mic Blackbody Radiation at 3.58 mm.” Soviet Astronomy 15, 29 (1971)

1971
[102]

Primeval ﬁreball intensity at λ=3.3 mm,

P. E. Boynton, R. A. Stokes, and D. T. Wilkinson, “Primeval ﬁreball intensity at λ=3.3 mm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 462–465 (1968)

1968
[103]

Cosmic Background Radiation at λ=3.3 mm,

M. F. Millea, M. McColl, R. J. Pedersen, and F. L. Vernon, “Cosmic Background Radiation at λ=3.3 mm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 919–922 (1971)

1971
[104]

Airborne measurement of the temperature of the cosmic microwave background at 3.3 mm,

P. E. Boynton and R. A. Stokes, “Airborne measurement of the temperature of the cosmic microwave background at 3.3 mm,” Nature (London) 247, 528–530 (1974)

1974
[105]

The Absolute Temperature of the Sky and the Temperature of the Cosmic Background Radiation at 600 MHz,

G. Sironi, M. Limon, G. Marcellino, G. Bonelli, M. Bersanelli, G. Conti, and K. Reif, “The Absolute Temperature of the Sky and the Temperature of the Cosmic Background Radiation at 600 MHz,” ApJ357, 301 (1990)

1990
[106]

The Brightness Tem- perature of the South Celestial Pole and the Temperature of the Cosmic Background Radiation Measured at 36.6 and 12 Centimeter Wavelength,

G. Sironi, G. Bonelli, and M. Limon, “The Brightness Tem- perature of the South Celestial Pole and the Temperature of the Cosmic Background Radiation Measured at 36.6 and 12 Centimeter Wavelength,” ApJ378, 550 (1991)

1991
[107]

A measurement of the cosmic microwave background temperature 1280 MHz,

A. Raghunathan and R. Subrahmanyan, “A measurement of the cosmic microwave background temperature 1280 MHz,” Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 21, 1–17 (2000)

2000
[108]

A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature at 1.410 GHz,

S. M. Levin, C. Witebsky, M. Bensadoun, M. Bersanelli, G. de Amici, A. Kogut, and G. F. Smoot, “A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature at 1.410 GHz,” ApJ334, 14 (1988)

1988
[109]

An Absolute Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature at 20 Centimeters,

S. T. Staggs, N. C. Jarosik, D. T. Wilkinson, and E. J. Wol- lack, “An Absolute Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature at 20 Centimeters,” ApJ 458, 407 (1996)

1996
[110]

Measure- ments of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at 1.47 GHz,

M. Bensadoun, M. Bersanelli, G. de Amici, A. Kogut, S. M. Levin, M. Limon, G. F. Smoot, and C. Witebsky, “Measure- ments of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at 1.47 GHz,” ApJ409, 1 (1993)

1993
[111]

Absolute Measure- ment of the Cosmic Microwave Background at 2 GHz,

M. Bersanelli, M. Bensadoun, G. de Amici, S. Levin, M. Limon, G. F. Smoot, and W. Vinje, “Absolute Measure- ment of the Cosmic Microwave Background at 2 GHz,” ApJ 424, 517 (1994)

1994
[112]

The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation at 3.8 GHz: Results of a Measurement from the South Pole Site,

G. de Amici, M. Bersanelli, A. Kogut, S. Levin, M. Limon, and G. F. Smoot, “The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation at 3.8 GHz: Results of a Measurement from the South Pole Site,” ApJ381, 341 (1991)

1991
[113]

Measurements of the Cosmic Background Radiation Temperature at 6.3 Centimeters,

N. Mandolesi, P. Calzolari, S. Cortiglioni, G. Morigi, L. Danese, and G. de Zotti, “Measurements of the Cosmic Background Radiation Temperature at 6.3 Centimeters,” ApJ 310, 561 (1986)

1986
[114]

A Measurement of the Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background at a Frequency of 7.5 GHz,

A. Kogut, M. Bensadoun, G. de Amici, S. Levin, G. F. Smoot, and C. Witebsky, “A Measurement of the Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background at a Frequency of 7.5 GHz,” ApJ 355, 102 (1990)

1990
[115]

A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at 7.5 GHz,

S. Levin, M. Bensadoun, M. Bersanelli, G. de Amici, A. Kogut, M. Limon, and G. Smoot, “A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at 7.5 GHz,” ApJ 396, 3 (1992)

1992
[116]

The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation at a Frequency of 10 GHz,

A. Kogut, M. Bersanelli, G. de Amici, S. D. Friedman, M. Grifﬁth, B. Grossan, S. Levin, G. F. Smoot, and C. Witeb- sky, “The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation at a Frequency of 10 GHz,” ApJ325, 1 (1988)

1988
[117]

A 1% Measurement of the Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Radiation at lambda = 1.2 Centimeters,

D. G. Johnson and D. T. Wilkinson, “A 1% Measurement of the Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Radiation at lambda = 1.2 Centimeters,” ApJ313, L1 (1987)

1987
[118]

New 33 GHz measurements of the cosmic background radia- tion intensity,

G. de Amici, G. Smoot, S. D. Friedman, and C. Witebsky, “New 33 GHz measurements of the cosmic background radia- tion intensity,” ApJ298, 710–731 (1985)

1985
[119]

Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature at 90 GHz,

M. Bersanelli, C. Witebsky, M. Bensadoun, G. de Amici, A. Kogut, S. M. Levin, and G. F. Smoot, “Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature at 90 GHz,” Astrophys. J.339, 632 (1989)

1989
[120]

PhD Thesis,

J. A. Schuster, “PhD Thesis,” PhD Thesis, UC Berkeley (1993)

1993
[121]

Measurement of the Intensity 12 of the Cosmic Background Radiation at 3.7 GHz,

G. de Amici, G. F. Smoot, J. Aymon, M. Bersanelli, A. Kogut, S. M. Levin, and C. Witebsky, “Measurement of the Intensity 12 of the Cosmic Background Radiation at 3.7 GHz,” ApJ 329, 556 (1988)

1988
[122]

Measurement of the cosmic background radiation tempera- ture at 6.3 cm,

N. Mandolesi, P. Calzolari, S. Cortiglioni, and G. Morigi, “Measurement of the cosmic background radiation tempera- ture at 6.3 cm,” Phys. Rev. D29, 2680–2682 (1984)

1984
[123]

Measurement of the cos- mic background radiation at 12 cm,

G. Sironi, P. Inzani, and A. Ferrari, “Measurement of the cos- mic background radiation at 12 cm,” Phys. Rev. D 29, 2686– 2689 (1984)

1984
[124]

The Temperature of the Diffuse Background Radiation at 12 Centimeter Wavelength,

G. Sironi and G. Bonelli, “The Temperature of the Diffuse Background Radiation at 12 Centimeter Wavelength,” ApJ 311, 418 (1986)

1986
[125]

The Temperature of the Cosmic Background Radiation: Results from the 1987 and 1988 Measurements at 3.8 GHz,

G. de Amici, M. Bensadoun, M. Bersanelli, A. Kogut, S. Levin, G. F. Smoot, and C. Witebsky, “The Temperature of the Cosmic Background Radiation: Results from the 1987 and 1988 Measurements at 3.8 GHz,” ApJ359, 219 (1990). Appendix A: Data compilation and ﬁt procedure In Table ...

1990
[126]

condensed

was applied to subtract the global contribution by un- resolved extragalactic radio sources, we considered also a higher subtraction to account for possible higher differential number counts at faint ﬂux densities. These two somewhat different subtractions are also applied to ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

condensed

The data listed in Table 1 of the ARCADE 2 data in- terpretation paper [10], but not the FIRAS “condensed” data at 250 GHz)

[2] [2]

The data compilation from the various experiments re- ported in Table 1 of [30] where joint constraints on early and late CMB spectral distortions were presented

[3] [3]

The measurements by the TRIS experiment together with the long wavelength compilation in Table 1 re- ported in [31]

[4] [4]

We take from [7] the measure- ments at the ﬁve lowest FIRAS frequencies while the results in [32] are used above 68 GHz

The extremely accurate measurements by FIRAS on board COBE [7, 32]. We take from [7] the measure- ments at the ﬁve lowest FIRAS frequencies while the results in [32] are used above 68 GHz. A little rescaling is applied to the FIRAS data to account for the last abso- lute temperature calibration by [33] atT∗ = 2.72548 K. We do not include the data by the C...

[5] [5]

They refer to the extragalactic signal without any subtraction of the known contribution by extragalactic sources, that we perform as described below

The recent data between 0.04 GHz and 0.08 GHz by [34]. They refer to the extragalactic signal without any subtraction of the known contribution by extragalactic sources, that we perform as described below. Note that the value adopted by the authors for the extragalactic background temperature at 408 MHz is consistent with 3 the one in Table 1 of [10], but...

[6] [6]

Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravita- tional lensing,

Planck Collaboration, “Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravita- tional lensing,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1807.06210 (2018), arXiv:1807.06210 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2018

[7] [7]

In the case of the data by [34] we perform the sub- traction using both the recipe by [35] and this higher model

was applied to subtract the global contribution by un- resolved extragalactic radio sources, as for instance in [10], we report also the background temperature derived applying the higher subtraction described above to account for possible higher differential number counts at faint ﬂux densities (third column). In the case of the data by [34] we perform t...

[8] [8]

ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Absolute Sky Brightness at 3-90 GHz,

D. J. Fixsen, A. Kogut, S. Levin, M. Limon, P. Lubin, P. Mirel, M. Seiffert, J. Singal, E. Wollack, T. Villela, and C. A. Wuensche, “ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Absolute Sky Brightness at 3-90 GHz,” Astrophys. J. 734, 5 (2011), arXiv:0901.0555

arXiv 2011