On the supersymmetric extension of asymptotic symmetries in three spacetime dimensions

Evelyn Rodr\'iguez; Octavio Fierro; Patrick Concha; Ricardo Caroca

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 111 references

On the supersymmetric extension of asymptotic symmetries in three spacetime dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that S-expanding the super-Virasoro algebra with the semigroups S(4)_E and S(4)_M yields new infinite-dimensional Lie superalgebras: the supersymmetric extensions of the deformed BMS3 algebra and the enlarged BMS3 algebra.

desk verdict A mostly sound S-expansion construction of new 3D super-BMS3-type algebras, with a resonance-decomposition typo and unverified Jacobi identities that are fixable rather than fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09150 v2 pith:7FDDIB4H submitted 2019-08-24 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Ricardo Caroca , Patrick Concha , Octavio Fierro , Evelyn Rodríguez This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP

keywords semigroupexpansionsuper-VirasoroalgebraBMS3MaxwellsuperalgebraAdS-LorentzasymptoticsymmetriesChern-SimonssupergravityR-symmetry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's goal is to fill two known gaps in the list of three-dimensional asymptotic supersymmetries. By applying the semigroup-expansion method to the super-Virasoro algebra, the authors construct new infinite-dimensional Lie superalgebras that are the supersymmetric extensions of the deformed BMS3 algebra, which is the asymptotic symmetry of Maxwell Chern-Simons gravity, and of the enlarged BMS3 algebra, which is the asymptotic symmetry of so(2,2)⊕so(2,1) gravity. The new structures are infinite-dimensional lifts of the Maxwell and AdS-Lorentz superalgebras, and a flat limit ℓ→∞ connects the two families. Extending to N=2 and N=4 forces the inclusion of R-symmetry generators, appearing as û(1) or sû(2) current algebras. A sympathetic reader should care because these are the natural candidate asymptotic symmetries for the corresponding three-dimensional supergravity theories, where none were previously known.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the abelian semigroup expansion of a Lie superalgebra, together with resonance and 0S-reduction. The method multiplies each super-Virasoro generator by a semigroup element λ_α and uses the semigroup multiplication law to assemble new structure constants; a resonant decomposition respects the ℤ₂ grading of super-Virasoro into bosonic and fermionic subspaces, and 0S-reduction deletes the zero element. The semigroups S(4)_E = {λ0,...,λ5} (with zero element λ5) for the Maxwell/deformed side and S(4)_M = {λ0,...,λ4} (no zero element) for the AdS-Lorentz/enlarged side carry the construction: they are the same semigroups that produce the Maxwell and AdS-Lorentz superalgebras from the super-Lorentz algebra, so expanding super-Virasoro with them yields the infinite-dimensional lifts.

What would settle it

Directly compute the graded Jacobi identities for the algebras (4.5) and (4.27), especially mixed triples such as (P, G, G) and (J, G, H); since the paper does not show this check, any non-closure would show that the expanded brackets are not a Lie superalgebra. The finite Maxwell and AdS-Lorentz subalgebras are known to satisfy Jacobi, so the decisive test is in the extra infinite-dimensional directions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the S-expansion of the super-Virasoro algebra with the semigroup S(4)_E (multiplication table 4.1) produces, after resonant subalgebra extraction and 0S-reduction, the minimal deformed super-BMS3 algebra of equation (4.5), while the same procedure with the zero-free semigroup S(4)_M (table 4.23) gives the minimal enlarged super-BMS3 algebra of equation (4.27). These are the first supersymmetric extensions of the deformed and enlarged BMS3 algebras, and each contains as a finite subalgebra the corresponding known finite superalgebra, Maxwell or AdS-Lorentz, so the new structures are their infinite-dimensional lifts. Applied to the N=2 and N=4 super-Virasoro algebras, the same semigroups yield N-extended versions that require R-symmetry generators, and the enlarged family reduces to the deformed family in the flat limit ℓ→∞.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the semigroup-expansion theorem guarantees the super-Jacobi identities for the particular semigroups and resonant decompositions used here; the paper writes the new brackets without displaying an explicit super-Jacobi verification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Equation (4.5) is the natural candidate for the asymptotic symmetry algebra of three-dimensional Maxwell Chern-Simons supergravity, and (4.27) for the so(2,2)⊕so(2,1) supergravity theory.
The enlarged super-BMS3 algebra reduces to the deformed one in the flat limit ℓ→∞, mirroring the known flat limit between AdS-Lorentz and Maxwell superalgebras and extending it to the whole infinite-dimensional structure.
In a suitable basis the minimal enlarged algebra splits into three Virasoro copies, two of which are supersymmetric; the N-extended versions similarly split into superconformal plus Virasoro factors with û(1) or sû(2) currents.
The N=2 and N=4 extensions show that R-symmetry generators are unavoidable in these asymptotic superalgebras; in the N=4 flat limit one of the sû(2) currents degenerates into a central charge.
The same S-expansion method also reproduces the known super-BMS3 and superconformal algebras from smaller semigroups, placing all these asymptotic supersymmetries in one common derivation scheme.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the authors' conjecture is right, a direct charge-algebra computation with null-boundary conditions on the Maxwell and so(2,2)⊕so(2,1) supergravity actions of [53,73] should reproduce (4.5) and (4.27); that computation is the natural next test.
The same semigroup ladder suggests that every member of the B_k family of Maxwell-like algebras has an infinite-dimensional lift obtainable by expanding super-Virasoro with larger S^{(k)}_E semigroups, even though only k=4 is treated here.
The 'non-standard' contraction (4.55) implies a family of one-spinor asymptotic superalgebras whose finite part is the non-standard Maxwell superalgebra; these could support exotic supergravity actions but, by the paper's own criterion, would not admit a well-defined invariant action without a second spinor charge.
The split into superconformal ⊕ Virasoro factors points toward a supersymmetric Galilean conformal algebra obtained by contraction, a connection the authors flag as work in progress.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the new superalgebras are probably correct and worth having. The paper applies S-expansion to super-Virasoro with the semigroups S(4)_E and S(4)_M to get deformed and enlarged super-BMS3 algebras, then extends to N=2 and N=4 with R-symmetry currents. The bracket computations are explicit, the flat limit relating the two families is clearly demonstrated, and the recovery of known super-BMS3 and superconformal algebras as warm-ups is a good sanity check. The identification of the extra spinor charge H_r needed for the (P,G,G) Jacobi identity is a nice touch. This is a legitimate new result within a narrow subfield, not a breakthrough.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The worst is eq. (4.24): for S(4)_M the paper declares S0={λ0,λ2,λ3} and S1={λ1,λ3}. That is not a partition, and it fails resonance because λ2·λ3=λ1 (using table 4.23), so S0·S0 is not contained in S0. The N=2 version in eq. (4.33) uses the correct decomposition S0={λ0,λ2,λ4}, S1={λ1,λ3}, and the brackets (4.27)-(4.28) are consistent with that, so I suspect this is a typo rather than a structural error. But as written, the reader cannot verify the central hypothesis of the S-expansion theorem for the main enlarged algebra. The paper also does not spell out Jacobi identities, relying on the general theorem from [49]. That is acceptable if the decomposition is correct; with the typo, the proof is incomplete. The N=2 and N=4 extensions add R-symmetry brackets like [G^i_r,T_m] and [H^i_r,B_m] that deserve at least a statement that they satisfy Jacobi, since the N=1 (P,G,G) check doesn't cover them.

Minor issues: Z_m is used for both the Maxwell generator and the R-symmetry current, which is confusing; eqs. (4.11) and (4.34) have stray commas; the abstract claims to obtain "supersymmetric extensions of asymptotic symmetries" when the paper itself is careful to say the physical identification with actual boundary conditions is a conjecture left for future work. These are all easy fixes.

Who needs this paper? People working on 3D supergravity asymptotic symmetries, S-expansion methods, or Maxwell/AdS-Lorentz superalgebras. It deserves a serious referee: the construction is novel, the computations look reproducible, and the issues are patchable. I would send it out and ask the referee to check the resonance decomposition and the Jacobi claim carefully. With those fixed it is publishable.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Abelian semigroup expansion (S-expansion) to the N=1, N=2, and N=4 super-Virasoro algebras and obtains both known and new infinite-dimensional Lie superalgebras. The known examples are the super-BMS3, superconformal, and (1,1) superconformal algebras. The new examples are called the deformed and enlarged super-BMS3 algebras; they are presented as infinite-dimensional lifts of the Maxwell and AdS-Lorentz superalgebras, respectively, and are related by a flat limit ℓ→∞. The N=2 and N=4 versions require additional R-symmetry current generators. The paper is primarily an explicit calculation of brackets using the S-expansion framework of [49] and the authors' earlier bosonic constructions [50,51].

Significance. If the construction is valid, the paper provides concrete candidate asymptotic symmetry superalgebras for Maxwell and AdS-Lorentz Chern-Simons supergravities, and it unifies several previously known infinite-dimensional superalgebras within one S-expansion scheme. The paper is commendably explicit: the semigroup tables, generator identifications, and all (anti-)commutation relations are written out, and the finite-subalgebra identifications are clear. The physical interpretation is properly presented as a conjecture, since no boundary-condition analysis is carried out. The principal weaknesses are local but load-bearing: the resonance decomposition in Eq. (4.24) is inconsistent as written, the symbol Z_m is used for two different generators in the N=2 deformed algebra, and the paper does not explicitly state why the general S-expansion theorem covers the resonant, 0S-reduced, and R-symmetry-extended brackets used here. These issues are correctable and do not appear to invalidate the overall approach.

major comments (3)

[§4.2.1, Eq. (4.24)] The subset decomposition S0={λ0,λ2,λ3}, S1={λ1,λ3} is not a partition: λ3 appears in both sets and λ4 is omitted. More seriously, it fails the resonance condition S0·S0⊂S0: from the multiplication table (4.23), λ2·λ3=λ1, which lies in S1. The brackets (4.27)-(4.28) are therefore not the output of the resonant subalgebra built from the decomposition stated in (4.24). The consistent choice is S0={λ0,λ2,λ4}, S1={λ1,λ3}, which is exactly the decomposition used implicitly for the minimal enlarged algebra and explicitly for the N=2 case in Eq. (4.33). Please correct Eq. (4.24) and re-derive the minimal enlarged algebra from the corrected decomposition; as written, the central construction of §4.2.1 is not well defined.
[§4.1.2, Eq. (4.11)] The symbol Z_m is assigned to two different generators in Eq. (4.11): one comes from the bosonic sector, ℓ²Z_m=λ4ℓ_m, and another comes from the R-symmetry sector, ℓ²Z_m=λ4R_m. This makes the subsequent brackets (4.12)-(4.14) ambiguous; for instance, [P_m,P_n]=(m−n)Z_{m+n}+⋯ and [P_m,B_n]=−nZ_{m+n} cannot both refer to the same Z_{m+n}. The R-symmetry generator should be renamed, e.g. as Z̃_m or 𝒵_m, and all N=2 deformed brackets should be written with unambiguous notation. The analogous N=4 notation (Z_m vs Z^a_m) is distinguishable, but the N=2 case is not.
[§2, §4.1.1, §4.2.1] The paper does not explicitly verify the super-Jacobi identities for any of the new algebras. The only internal check mentioned is the (P,G,G) identity in §4.1.1. The S-expansion theorem of [49] presumably guarantees that the expanded algebra is a Lie superalgebra, but the paper should state explicitly that (i) the resonant subalgebra (2.6) is a subalgebra under the resonance condition (2.5), (ii) the 0S-reduction is a quotient by an ideal, and (iii) the same theorem applies to the N=2 and N=4 R-symmetry brackets, which involve products of the expanded R_m generators with the expanded supercharges. Without such a statement, the status of Eqs. (4.5), (4.27)-(4.28), and (4.40)-(4.43) as Lie superalgebras rests on an unstated hypothesis. A short proof or a precise citation to the relevant theorem in [49] would close this gap.

minor comments (3)

[§4.1.2, §4.1.3] There are typographical extra commas in the generator definitions, e.g. after ℓ²Z_m=λ4R_m in Eq. (4.11) and after ℓ²Z^a_m=λ4R^a_m in Eq. (4.19).
[§4.2.2, Eq. (4.37) and §4.2.3, Eq. (4.46)] The definitions of Q̄_r and Q̄^{i,±}_r contain a power of ℓ that appears inconsistent with the corresponding definitions in Eq. (4.30): the second term should presumably be ℓ^{3/2}H_r rather than ℓH_r.
[Appendix B, Eq. (B.6)] A stray factor 'i' appears before the commutators in Eq. (B.6); the brackets are real Lie algebra brackets and this factor should be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: explicit semigroup expansions generate the new brackets; self-citations are contextual and the asymptotic claim is conjectural.

full rationale

The central constructions are explicit S-expansions, not inversions of the desired results. The paper starts from the super-Virasoro brackets (2.7), fixes Abelian semigroups with multiplication tables (4.1) and (4.23), defines the expanded generators via (4.4)/(4.11)/(4.19) and (4.26)/(4.34), and then computes the (anti-)commutators by substituting the semigroup products into (2.1)-(2.3). The resulting algebras in (4.5), (4.12)-(4.14) and (4.27)-(4.28) are not assumed to match the target bosonic algebras; they are direct outputs of the stated data. There is no fitted parameter and no statistically forced prediction. The citations to the authors' own earlier work [50,51] motivate the choice of semigroup and identify the bosonic limits, but the fermionic brackets are new explicit computations, not imported conclusions, so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The asymptotic-symmetry interpretation is explicitly conjectural ('We conjecture that the new infinite-dimensional superalgebras obtained here would correspond to the asymptotic symmetries...' in Section 4.1 and again in Section 5), so it is not presented as a derived prediction that could reduce to its inputs. Separately, for correctness rather than circularity: eq. (4.24) gives a resonance decomposition S0={lambda0,lambda2,lambda3}, S1={lambda1,lambda3} that is not a partition of S(4)_M and fails the resonance condition S0*S0 in S0; the brackets use S0={lambda0,lambda2,lambda4} as in eq. (4.33), so the printed decomposition appears to be a typo. Also, full super-Jacobi identities for the new N=1,2,4 algebras are not demonstrated; only the (P,G,G) identity is mentioned in Section 4.1.1. These gaps affect mathematical verification and confidence, but not the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The new algebras are generated by a fixed algebraic procedure from the super-Virasoro algebra; there are no fitted numerical parameters. The axioms are the standard S-expansion theorem, the choice of super-Virasoro as starting algebra, the tailored semigroup tables, and the flat-limit identification. The invented entities are the new generators (the second spinor charge H_r and the R-symmetry currents) that appear in the expanded algebras; they have no independent experimental handle in this paper.

assumptions (4)

standard math S-expansion of a Lie (super)algebra by an Abelian semigroup S, followed by resonant subalgebra extraction and 0S-reduction, yields a Lie (super)algebra (Jacobi identity preserved).
Invoked throughout Sections 3 and 4; the paper does not re-derive this theorem but relies on [49]. The commutation relations of the new algebras are obtained by this procedure.
domain assumption The super-Virasoro algebra (2.7), and its N=2 and N=4 extensions (4.8) and (4.17), are the correct starting algebras whose S-expansion produces asymptotic superalgebras.
The paper assumes these are the appropriate 'original' superalgebras, following [51] for N=1 and extending to N=2,4.
ad hoc to paper The specific semigroups S(4)_E (4.1) and S(4)_M (4.23), with their subset decompositions, are resonant with the Z2 grading of the super-Virasoro algebra, so the relevant commutation relations survive the 0S-reduction.
The semigroup tables and decompositions are chosen to reproduce the Maxwell and AdS-Lorentz superalgebras at finite level; their correctness is verified by direct multiplication but the choice is tailored to the desired output.
domain assumption The flat limit ℓ→∞ maps the enlarged super-BMS3 algebra to the deformed super-BMS3 algebra, and this limit is compatible with the infinite-dimensional lift.
Used in Sections 4.2 and 4.2.3; the limit is taken on the explicit brackets, but no independent justification beyond the finite-level analogue is provided.

invented entities (2)

H_r (additional spinor charge in N=1 deformed/enlarged super-BMS3)
purpose: Closes the Jacobi identity for the (P,G,G) and related brackets, and provides the fermionic partner of the Z_m generator.
Introduced ad hoc in eq. (4.4) and (4.26) to ensure a consistent supersymmetric extension; it is not observed independently and no supergravity action with boundary conditions is constructed.
R-symmetry generators T_m, B_m, Z_m (N=2) and T^a_m, B^a_m, Z^a_m (N=4)
purpose: Provide the R-symmetry structure required by the N=2 and N=4 super-Virasoro algebras and appear in the expanded algebras as u(1) or su(2) current algebras.
They are derived by S-expanding the R-symmetry generator of the N=2/4 super-Virasoro algebra, so they are not arbitrary, but they have no independent experimental or action-level confirmation in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the supersymmetric extension of asymptotic symmetries in three spacetime dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7FDDIB4H

@misc{pith2026190809150,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the supersymmetric extension of asymptotic symmetries in three spacetime dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7FDDIB4H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09150}
}

abstract

In this work we obtain known and new supersymmetric extensions of diverse asymptotic symmetries defined in three spacetime dimensions by considering the semigroup expansion method. The super-$BMS_3$, the superconformal algebra and new infinite-dimensional superalgebras are obtained by expanding the super-Virasoro algebra. The new superalgebras obtained are supersymmetric extensions of the asymptotic algebras of the Maxwell and the $\mathfrak{so}(2,2)\oplus\mathfrak{so}(2,1)$ gravity theories. We extend our results to the $\mathcal{N}=2$ and $\mathcal{N}=4$ cases and find that R-symmetry generators are required. We also show that the new infinite-dimensional structures are related through a flat limit $\ell \rightarrow \infty$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[49]

New N=2 SuperBMS$_3$ algebra and Invariant Dual Theory for 3D Supergravity

N. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharjee, Neetu, T. Neogi, New N=2 SuperBMS 3 algebra and Invariant Dual Theory for 3D Supergravity , arXiv:1905.10239 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 1905
[1]

Brown, M

J.D. Brown, M. Henneaux, Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic s ym- metries: an example from three-dimensional gravity . Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207

1986
[2]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Bicak, B.G. Schmidt, Asymptotic structure of symmetry reduced general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 669. [gr-qc/9608042]

arXiv 1997
[3]

Barnich, G

G. Barnich, G. Compere, Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at nu ll inﬁnity in three spacetime dimensions , Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) F15. [gr-qc/0610130]

arXiv 2007
[4]

Barnich, C

G. Barnich, C. Troessaert, Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 1005 (2010) 062. arXiv:1001.1541 [hep-th]

arXiv 2010
[5]

Bondi, M.G.J

H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg, A.W.K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity
[6]

Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity

R.K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asym ptotically ﬂat space- times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 270 (1962) 103

1962
[7]

Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269 (1962) 21

1962

Show all 111 references

[8]

Gonzalez, J

H.A. Gonzalez, J. Matulich, M. Pino, R. Troncoso, Asymptotically ﬂat spacetimes in three- dimensional higher spin gravity , JHEP 1309 (2013) 016. arXiv:1307.5651 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[9]

Afshar, A

H. Afshar, A. Bagchi, R. Fareghbal, D. Grumiller, J. Ross eel, Spin-3 Gravity in Three- Dimensional Flat Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) no.12, 121603. arXiv:1307.4768 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[10]

Gonzalez, M

H.A. Gonzalez, M. Pino, Boundary dynamics of asymptotically ﬂat 3D gravity coupled to higher spin ﬁelds , JHEP 05 (2014) 127. arXiv:1403.4898 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[11]

Matulich, A

J. Matulich, A. Perez, D. Tempo, R. Troncoso, Higher spin extension of cosmological space- times in 3D: asymptotically ﬂat behavior with chemical pote ntials and thermodynamics , JHEP 05 (2015) 025. arXiv:1412.1464 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[12]

Fuentealba, J

O. Fuentealba, J. Matulich, R. Troncoso, Asymptotically ﬂat structure of hypergravity in three spacetime dimensions, JHEP 10 (2015) 009. arXiv:1508.04663 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[13]

Banerjee, D.P

N. Banerjee, D.P. Jatkar, S. Mukhi, T. Neogi, Free-ﬁeld realisations of the BMS 3 algebra and its extensions , JHEP 06 (2016) 024. arXiv:1512.06240 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[14]

Detournay, M

S. Detournay, M. Riegler, Enhanced Asymptotic Symmetry Algebra of 2+1 Dimensional Fl at Space, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 046008. arXiv:1612.00278 [hep-th]. 34

2017 arXiv
[15]

Setare, H

M.R. Setare, H. Adami, Enhanced asymptotic BMS 3 algebra of the ﬂat spacetime solutions of generalized minimal massive gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 926 (2018) 70. arXiv:1703.00936 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[16]

Farmhand Parsa, H.R

A. Farmhand Parsa, H.R. Safari, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, On Rigidity of 3d Asymptotic Sym- metry Algebras, arXiv:1809.08209 [hep-th]

arXiv
[17]

Safari, M.M

H.R. Safari, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, BMS 4 algebra, its stability and deformations , JHEP 1904 (2019) 068. arXiv:1902.03260 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[18]

Concha, N

P. Concha, N. Merino, O. Miskovic, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado-Rebolledo, O. Valdivia, Asymp- totic symmetries of three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravit y for the Maxwell algebra . JHEP 10 (2018) 079. arXiv:1805.08834 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[19]

Bacry, P

H. Bacry, P. Combe, J.L. Richard, Group-theoretical analysis of elementary particles in an external electromagnetic ﬁelds. 1. The relativistic partic le in a constant and uniform ﬁeld , Nuovo Cim. A 67 (1970) 267

1970
[20]

Schrader, The Maxwell group and the quantum theory of particles in class ical homogeneous electromagnetic ﬁelds , Fortsch

R. Schrader, The Maxwell group and the quantum theory of particles in class ical homogeneous electromagnetic ﬁelds , Fortsch. Phys. 20 (1972) 701

1972
[21]

Gomis, A

J. Gomis, A. Kleinschmidt, On free Lie algebras and particles in electro-magnetic ﬁelds , JHEP 07 (2017) 085. arXiv:1705.05854 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[22]

de Azcarraga, K

J.A. de Azcarraga, K. Kamimura, J. Lukierski, Generalized cosmological term from Maxwell symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 124036. arXiv:1012.4402 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[23]

Durka, J

R. Durka, J. Kowalski-Glikman, M. Szczachor, Gauges AdS-Maxwell algebra and gravity , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26 (2011) 2689. arXiv:1107.4728 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[24]

de Azcarraga, K

J.A. de Azcarraga, K. Kamimura, J. Lukierski, Maxwell symmetries and some applications , Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 23 (2013) 01160. arXiv:1201.2850 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[25]

Concha, D.M

P.K. Concha, D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado, Even-dimensional General Relativity from Born-Infeld gravity , Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 419. arXiv:1309.0062 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[26]

Concha, D.M

P.K. Concha, D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgad o, Chern-Simons and Born-Infeld gravity theories and Maxwell algebras type , Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2741. arXiv:1402.0023 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[27]

Concha, D.M

P.K. Concha, D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado, Generalized Poincar´ e algebras and Lovelock-Cartan gravity theory , Phys. Lett. B 742 (2015) 310. arXiv:1405.7078 [hep.th]

2015 arXiv
[28]

Salgado, R.J

P. Salgado, R.J. Szabo, O. Valdivia, Topological gravity and transgression holography , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 084077. arXiv:1401.3653 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[29]

Hoseinzadeh, A

S. Hoseinzadeh, A. Rezaei-Aghdam, (2+1)-dimensional gravity from Maxwell and semisim- ple extension of the Poincar´ e gauge symmetric models , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 084008. arXiv:1402.0320 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[30]

Cebecio˘ glu, S

O. Cebecio˘ glu, S. Kibaro˘ glu,Maxwell-aﬃne gauge theory of gravity , Phys. Lett. B 751 (2015)

2015
[31]

Gomis, A

J. Gomis, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Palmkvist, Symmetries of M-theory and free Lie superalgebras , JHEP 03 (2019) 160. arXiv:1809.09171 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[32]

Avil´ es, E

L. Avil´ es, E. Frodden, J. Gomis, D. Hidalgo, J. Zanelli , Non-Relativistic Maxwell Chern- Simons Gravity , JHEP 1805 (2018) 047. arXiv:1802.08453 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[33]

Salgado-Rebolledo, The Maxwell group in 2+1 dimensions and its inﬁnite-dimensio nal enhancements, arXiv:1905.09421 [hep-th]

P. Salgado-Rebolledo, The Maxwell group in 2+1 dimensions and its inﬁnite-dimensio nal enhancements, arXiv:1905.09421 [hep-th]

1905 arXiv
[34]

Kibaro˘ glu, M

S. Kibaro˘ glu, M. S ¸enay, O. Cebecio˘ glu,D = 4 topological gravity from gauging the Maxwell- special-aﬃne group , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34 (2019) 1950016. arXiv:1810.01635 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[35]

Soroka, V.A

D.V. Soroka, V.A. Soroka, Semi-simple extension of the (super)Poincar´ e algebra, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2009 (2009) [hep-th/0605251]

2009 arXiv
[36]

Concha, N

P. Concha, N. Merino, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado-Rebolledo, O. Valdivia, Semi-simple enlarge- ment of the bms3 algebra from a so(2, 2) ⊕ so(2, 1) Chern-Simons theory, JHEP 1902 (2019)

2019
[37]

arXiv:1810.12256 [hep-th]

arXiv
[38]

Salgado, S

P. Salgado, S. Salgado, so (D − 1, 1) ⊗ so (D − 1, 2) algebras and gravity , Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 5

2014
[39]

Gomis, K

J. Gomis, K. Kamimura, J. Lukierski, Deformations of Maxwell algebra and their dynamical realizations, JHEP 0908 (2009) 039. arXiv:0906.4464 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[40]

D ´ ıaz, O

J. D ´ ıaz, O. Fierro, F. Izaurieta, N. Merino, E. Rodrigu ez, P. Salgado, O. Valdivia, A gen- eralized action for (2 + 1 )-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity , J. Phys. A. Math. Theor. 45 (2012) 255207, arXiv:1311.2215 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[41]

Concha, E

P. Concha, E. Rodr ´ ıguez,Generalized Pure Lovelock Gravity , Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 616. arXiv:1708.08827 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[42]

Concha, R

P.K. Concha, R. Durka, C. Inostroza, N. Merino, E.K. Rod r ´ ıguez,Pure Lovelock gravity and Chern-Simons theory, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024055. arXiv:1603.09424 [hep-th],

2016 arXiv
[43]

Concha, N

P.K. Concha, N. Merino, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, Lovelock gravity from Born-Infeld gravity theory , Phys. Lett. B 765 (2017) 395. arXiv:1606.07083 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[44]

Lodato, W

I. Lodato, W. Merbis, Super-BMS 3 algebras from N = 2 ﬂat supergravities , JHEP 1611 (2016) 150. arXiv:1610.07506 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[45]

Concha, E

P. Concha, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, Non-Relativistic Gravity Theory based on an Enlargement of t he Extended Bargmann Algebra , JHEP 07 (2019) 085. arXiv:1906.00086 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[46]

Barnich, L

G. Barnich, L. Donnay, J. Matulich, R. Troncoso, Asymptotic symmetries and dynamics of three-dimensional ﬂat supergravity , JHEP 1408 (2014) 071. arXiv:1407.4275 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[47]

Banerjee, I

N. Banerjee, I. Lodato, T. Neogi, N=4 Supersymmetric BMS 3 algebras from asymptotic symmetry analysis , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 066029. arXiv:1706.02922 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[48]

Fuentealba, J

O. Fuentealba, J. Matulich, R. Troncoso, Asymptotic structure of N = 2 supergravity in 3D: extended super-BMS 3 and nonlinear energy bounds, JHEP 1709 (2017) 030. arXiv:1706.07542 [hep-th]. 36

2017 arXiv
[50]

Caroca, P

R. Caroca, P. Concha, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado-Reboll edo, Generalizing the bms3 and 2D-conformal algebra by expanding the Virasoro algebra , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 262. arXiv:1707.07209 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[51]

Banerjee, A

N. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharjee, I. Lodato, T. Neogi, Maximmaly N -extended super- BMS 3 algebras and Generalized 3D Gravity Solutions , JHEP 1901 (2019) 115. arXiv:1807.06768 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[52]

Izaurieta, E

F. Izaurieta, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado, Expanding Lie (super)algebras through Abelian semi- groups, J. Math. Phys. 47 (2006) 123512. [hep-th/0606215]

2006 arXiv
[53]

Concha, D.M

P. Concha, D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, E. Rodr ´ ıguez,On the Maxwell supergravity and ﬂat limit in 2+1 dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 247. arXiv:1807.00194 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[54]

Caroca, P

R. Caroca, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodr ´ ıguez,Three-dimensional Poincar´ e supergravity and N -extended supersymmetric BMS 3 algebra, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) 93. arXiv:1812.05065 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[55]

Bonanos, J

S. Bonanos, J. Gomis, K. Kamimura, J. Lukierski, Maxwell superalgebra and superparticle in constant Gauge background . Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 090401. arXiv:0911.5072 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[57]

Hastsuda, M

M. Hastsuda, M. Sakaguchi, Wess-Zumino term for the AdS superstring and generalized In¨ on¨ u-Wigner contraction. Prog. Theor. Phys. 109 (2003) 853. [hep-th/0106114]

2003 arXiv
[58]

de Azcarraga, J.M

J.A. de Azcarraga, J.M. Izquierdo, M. Picon, O. Varela, Generating Lie and gauge free dif- ferential (super)algebras by expanding Maurer-Cartan form s and Chern-Simons supergravity , Nucl. Phys. B 662 (2003) 185. [hep-th/0212347]

2003 arXiv
[59]

Caroca, N

R. Caroca, N. Merino, A. Perez, P. Salgado, Generating Higher-Order Lie Algebras by Ex- panding Maurer Cartan Forms , J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 123527. arXiv:1004.5503 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[60]

de Azcarraga, J.M

J.A. de Azcarraga, J.M. Izquierdo, M. Picon, O. Varela, Expansions of algebras and superal- gebras and some applications , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 46 (2007) 2734. [hep-th/0401033]

2007 arXiv
[61]

Caroca, N

R. Caroca, N. Merino, P. Salgado, S-Expansion of Higher-Order Lie Algebras , J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 013503. arXiv:1004.5213 [math-ph]

2009 arXiv
[62]

Andrianopoli, N

L. Andrianopoli, N. Merino, F. Nadal, M. Trigiante, General properties of the expansion methods of Lie algebras , J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 365204. arXiv:1308.4832 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[63]

Caroca, N

R. Caroca, N. Merino, P. Salgado, O. Valdivia, Generating inﬁnite-dimensional algebras from loop algebras by expanding Maurer-Cartan forms , J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011) 043519. arXiv:1311.2623 [math-ph]. 37

2011 arXiv
[64]

Caroca, I

R. Caroca, I. Kondrashuk, N. Merino, F. Nadal, Bianchi spaces and their three-dimensional isometries as S-expansions of two-dimensional isometries , J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 225201. arXiv:1104.3541 [math-ph]

2013 arXiv
[65]

Inostroza, I

C. Inostroza, I. Kondrashuk, N. Merino, F. Nadal, On a Java library to perform S-expansions of Lie algebras , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1085 (2018) 052010. arXiv:1802.04468 [math-ph]

2018 arXiv
[66]

Artebani, R

M. Artebani, R. Caroca. M.C. Ipinza, D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, P. S algado, Geometrical aspects of the Lie Algebra S-Expansion Procedure , J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016) 023516. arXiv:1602.04525 [math-ph]

2016 arXiv
[67]

Ipinza, F

M.C. Ipinza, F. Lingua, D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, L. Ravera, An Analytic Method for S -expansion involving Resonance and Reduction , Fortschr. Phys. 64 (2016) 854. arXiv:1609.05042 [hep- th]

2016 arXiv
[68]

Banerjee, D.P

N. Banerjee, D.P. Jatkar, I. Lodato, S. Mukhi, T. Neogi, Extended Supersymmetric BMS 3 algebras and Their Free Field Realisations , JHEP 11 (2016) 059. arXiv:1609.09210 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[69]

Inostroza, I

C. Inostroza, I. Kondrashuk, N. Merino, F. Nadal, On the algorithm to ﬁnd S-related Lie algebras, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1085 (2018) 052011. arXiv:1802.05765 [physics.comp-ph]

2018 arXiv
[70]

Lukierski, A

J. Lukierski, A. Nowicki, Superspinors and Graded Lorentz Groups in Three, Four and Fiv e Dimensions, Fortsch. Phys. 30 (1982) 75

1982
[71]

Mandal, Supersymmetric Extension of GCA in 2d , JHEP 1011 (2010) 018

I. Mandal, Supersymmetric Extension of GCA in 2d , JHEP 1011 (2010) 018. arXiv:1003.0209 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[72]

Barnich, L

G. Barnich, L. Donnay, J. Matulich, R. Troncoso, Super-BMS 3 invariant boundary theory from three-dimensional ﬂat supergravity , JHEP 1701 (2017) 029. arXiv:1510.08824 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[73]

Bagchi, I

A. Bagchi, I. Mandal, Supersymmetric Extension of Galilean Conformal Algebras , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 086011. arXiv:0905.0580 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[74]

Izaurieta, E

F. Izaurieta, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Minning, P. Salgado, A. Perez, Standard General Relativity from Chern-Simons Gravity , Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 213. arXiv:0905.2187 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[75]

Krishnan, A

C. Krishnan, A. Raju, S. Roy, A Grassmann path from AdS 3 to ﬂat space, J. High. Energy Phys. 1403 (2014) 036. arXiv:1312.2941 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[76]

Concha, N -extended Maxwell supergravities as Chern-Simons theories in three spacetime dimensions, Phys

P. Concha, N -extended Maxwell supergravities as Chern-Simons theories in three spacetime dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) 290. arXiv:1903.03081 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[77]

Fedoruk, J

S. Fedoruk, J. Lukierski, New spinorial particle model in tensorial space-time and in teracting higher spin ﬁelds , JHEP 1302 (2013) 128. arXiv:1210.1506 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[78]

Bonanos, J

S. Bonanos, J. Gomis, K. Kamimura, J. Lukierski, Deformations of Maxwell Superalgebras and Their Applications , J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010) 102301. arXiv:1005.3714 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[79]

Lukierski, Generalized Wigner-In¨ on¨ u Contractions and Maxwell (Super)Algebras, Proc

J. Lukierski, Generalized Wigner-In¨ on¨ u Contractions and Maxwell (Super)Algebras, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 272 (2011) no.1 183. arXiv:1007.3405 [hep-th]. 38

2011 arXiv
[80]

Concha, E.K

P.K. Concha, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez,Maxwell superalgebras and Abelian semigroup expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 886 (2014) 1128. arXiv:1405.1334 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[81]

de Azcarraga, J.M

J.A. de Azcarraga, J.M. Izquierdo, J. Lukierski, M. Wor onowicz, Generalizations of Maxwell (super)algebras by the expansion method , Nucl. Phys. B 869 (2013) 303. arXiv:1210.1117 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[82]

de Azcarraga, J.M

J.A. de Azcarraga, J.M. Izquierdo, Minimal D=4 supergravity from superMaxwell algebra , Nucl. Phys. B 885 (2014) 34. arXiv:1403.4128 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[83]

Concha, O

P.K. Concha, O. Fierro, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez,In¨ on¨ u-Wigner contraction and D=2+1 supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 48. arXiv:1611.05018 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[84]

Concha, E.K

P.K. Concha, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, N=1 Supergravity and Maxwell superalgebras , JHEP 1409 (2014) 090. arXiv:1407.4635 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[85]

Concha, O

P.K. Concha, O. Fierro, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado,Chern-Simons supergravity in D=3 and Maxwell superalgebra, Phys. Lett. B 750 (2015) 117. arXiv:1507.02335 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[86]

Kibaro˘ glu, O

S. Kibaro˘ glu, O. Cebecio˘ glu, D = 4 supergravity from the Maxwell-Weyl superalgebra , arXiv:1812.09861 [hep-th]

arXiv
[87]

Pe˜ naﬁel, L

D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, L. Ravera, On the Hidden Maxwell Superalgebra underlying D=4 Supergra vity, Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) 1700005. arXiv:1701.04234 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[88]

Ravera, Hidden role of Maxwell superalgebras in the free diﬀerentia l algebras of D = 4 and D = 11 supergravity, Eur

L. Ravera, Hidden role of Maxwell superalgebras in the free diﬀerentia l algebras of D = 4 and D = 11 supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 211. arXiv:1801.08860 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[89]

R. Basu, S. Detournay, M. Riegler, Spectral Flow in 3D Flat Spacetimes , JHEP 12 (2017)

2017
[90]

Green, Supertranslations, superstrings and Chern-Simons forms

M.B. Green, Supertranslations, superstrings and Chern-Simons forms . Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989) 157

1989
[91]

D’Auria, P

R. D’Auria, P. Fr´ e, Geometric supergravity in d=11 and its hidden supergroup , Nucl. Phys. B 201 (1982) 101

1982
[92]

Concha, M.C

P.K. Concha, M.C. Ipinza, L. Ravera, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, On the supersymmetric extension of Gauss-Bonnet like gravity , JHEP 09 (2016) 007. arXiv:1607.00373 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[93]

Baunadi, L

A. Baunadi, L. Ravera, Generalized AdS-Lorentz deformed supergravity on a manifo ld with boundary, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (2018) 514. arXiv:1803.08738 [hep-th]. 39

2018 arXiv
[94]

Ito, Extended superconformal algebras on AdS(3) , Phys

K. Ito, Extended superconformal algebras on AdS(3) , Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 48. [hep-th/9811002]

1999 arXiv
[95]

Concha, E.K

P.K. Concha, E.K. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salgado, Generalized supersymmetric cosmological term in N=1 Supergravity, JHEP 08 (2015) 009. arXiv:1504.01898 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[96]

Soroka, V.A

D.V. Soroka, V.A. Soroka, Tensor extension of the Poincar´ e algebra, Phys. Lett. B 607 (2005)

2005
[97]

Manda, A

I. Manda, A. Rayyan, Super-GCA from N = (2, 2) Super-Virasoro, Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016)

2016
[98]

Pe˜ naﬁel, L

D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, L. Ravera, Generalized cosmological term in D = 4 supergravity from a new AdS-Lorentz superalgebra, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 945. arXiv:1807.07673 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[99]

Fierro, F

O. Fierro, F. Izaurieta, P. Salgado, O. Valdivia, Minimal AdS-Lorentz supergravity in three- dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 198. arXiv:1401.3697 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[100]

Romano, Non-Relativistic Four Dimensional p-Brane Supersymmetri c Theories and Lie Algebra Expansion, arXiv:1906.08220 [hep-th]

L. Romano, Non-Relativistic Four Dimensional p-Brane Supersymmetri c Theories and Lie Algebra Expansion, arXiv:1906.08220 [hep-th]

1906 arXiv
[101]

Pe˜ naﬁel, P

D.M. Pe˜ naﬁel, P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Non-relativistic symmetries in three space-time dimen- sions and the Nappi-Witten algebra , Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 135005. arXiv:1906.02161 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[102]

Bansal, D

S. Bansal, D. Sorokin, Can Chern-Simons or Rarita-Schwinger be a Volkov-Akulov Gold - stone?, JHEP 07 (2018) 106. arXiv:1806.05945 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[103]

Bergshoeﬀ, J

E. Bergshoeﬀ, J. Izquierdo, T. Ort ´ ın, L. Romano, Lie Algebra Expansions and Actions for Non-Relativistic Gravity, JHEP 08 (2019) 048. arXiv:1904.08304 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[104]

de Azc´ arraga, D

J.A. de Azc´ arraga, D. G´ utiez, J.M. Izquierdo, Extended D = 3 Bargmann supergravity from a Lie algebra expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 946 (2019) 114706. arXiv:1904.12786 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[105]

Concha, L

P. Concha, L. Ravera, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, On the supersymmetry invariance of ﬂat supergravity with boundary, JHEP 01 (2019) 192. arXiv:1809.07871 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[106]

Caroca, P

R. Caroca, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, P. Salg ado-Rebolledo, Generalized Chern- Simons higher-spin gravity theories in three dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 934 (2018) 240. arXiv:1712.09975 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[107]

Durka, J

R. Durka, J. Kowalski-Glikman, Resonant algebras in Chern-Simons model of topological insulators, Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 516. arXiv:1906.02356 [hep-th]. 40

2019 arXiv
[108]

Chernyavsky, D

D. Chernyavsky, D. Sorokin, Three-dimensional (higher-spin) gravities with extended Schr¨ odinger and l-conformal Galilean symmetries , JHEP 07 (2019) 156. arXiv:1905.13154 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[109]

Hietarinta, Supersymmetry Generators of Arbitrary Spin , Phys

J. Hietarinta, Supersymmetry Generators of Arbitrary Spin , Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 838

1976
[131]

arXiv:1503.09003 [hep-th]. 35

arXiv
[134]

arXiv:1706.07438 [hep-th]

arXiv
[195]

arXiv:1601.04723 [hep-th]

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [49]

New N=2 SuperBMS$_3$ algebra and Invariant Dual Theory for 3D Supergravity

N. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharjee, Neetu, T. Neogi, New N=2 SuperBMS 3 algebra and Invariant Dual Theory for 3D Supergravity , arXiv:1905.10239 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 1905

[2] [1]

Brown, M

J.D. Brown, M. Henneaux, Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic s ym- metries: an example from three-dimensional gravity . Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207

1986

[3] [2]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Bicak, B.G. Schmidt, Asymptotic structure of symmetry reduced general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 669. [gr-qc/9608042]

arXiv 1997

[4] [3]

Barnich, G

G. Barnich, G. Compere, Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at nu ll inﬁnity in three spacetime dimensions , Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) F15. [gr-qc/0610130]

arXiv 2007

[5] [4]

Barnich, C

G. Barnich, C. Troessaert, Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 1005 (2010) 062. arXiv:1001.1541 [hep-th]

arXiv 2010

[6] [5]

Bondi, M.G.J

H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg, A.W.K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity

[7] [6]

Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity

R.K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asym ptotically ﬂat space- times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 270 (1962) 103

1962

[8] [7]

Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269 (1962) 21

1962