Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

$T\bar{T}$ deformations as TsT transformations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that T\bar{T} deformations of string sigma models are TsT transformations in a T-dual frame, and that the universal CDD factor is a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist of the worldsheet S-matrix.

desk verdict A careful, honest paper that packages T\bar{T} deformations as a TsT transformation in a T-dual frame, with explicit pp-wave and LLM geometries; the T-duality bridge is formal and singular at δa = 0, but the authors acknowledge this, so the claim reads as a well-defined reinterpretation of the deformed family rather than a literal statement at the undeformed point. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09299 v2 pith:32D3KYUU submitted 2019-08-25 hep-th

Alessandro Sfondrini , Stijn J. van Tongeren This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords T\bar{T}deformationuniformlight-conegaugeTsTtransformationDrinfel'd-ReshetikhintwistCDDfactorworldsheetS-matrixpp-wavegeometryLin-Lunin-Maldacenabackground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the T\bar{T} deformation of a string $\sigma$ model is not an abstract reshuffling of the worldsheet Hamiltonian but a concrete geometric operation: in the frame obtained by T-dualizing along one light-cone coordinate, it is a T-duality–shift–T-duality (TsT) transformation involving the two light-cone coordinates. The authors distinguish gauge-frame changes, which leave the theory unchanged, from genuine deformations, which change the Hamiltonian density without adjusting the worldsheet volume, and argue that only the latter are TsT transformations. If this is right, the universal CDD factor that T\bar{T} deformations insert into the worldsheet S-matrix is a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist, and T\bar{T}-deformed string models can be produced by standard solution-generating techniques. The paper works out explicit deformed geometries for pp-wave and Lin-Lunin-Maldacena backgrounds, showing the deformation affects global features of the geometry before gauge fixing. A sympathetic reader would care because it connects T\bar{T} deformations to integrability, S-matrix theory, and the geometric toolkit of string theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the TsT sequence: T-dualize along $X^-$, apply the coordinate shift $X^+ \to Y^+ = X^+ + 2\delta a\, X^-$, $X^- \to Y^- = X^-$ (the T\bar{T}-generating shift at $b=1/2$), then T-dualize back along $X^-$. The use of this sequence is to translate the T\bar{T} deformation, which in light-cone gauge looks like a state-dependent change of the worldsheet volume $R = J + a H_{\text{w.s.}}$, into a concrete geometric deformation of the T-dual background. The companion identity is the classification of TsT transformations as twists of boundary conditions: in the static-gauge frame the same operation appears as a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist $\exp(i\gamma \, \epsilon_{kl} \hat{Q}^k \otimes \hat{Q}^l)$ of the S-matrix, which for the two longitudinal charges reduces to the T\bar{T} CDD factor. These two pieces—the T-duality bridge and the twist interpretation—carry the entire argument.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop worldsheet S-matrix of the TsT-deformed pp-wave background (eq. 4.20) in static gauge and check whether the scattering phase is exactly $e^{i\delta a(p_j \omega_k(p_k) - p_k \omega_j(p_j))}$ with no quantum corrections; alternatively, take the $\delta a \to 0$ limit from both sides and check that the deformed theory tends to the same theory, since the T-duality in the null direction is ill-defined exactly at $\delta a=0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a genuine T\bar{T} deformation of a two-dimensional bosonic $\sigma$ model, distinct from a harmless change of light-cone gauge frame, is equivalent to a TsT transformation performed in the T-dual frame. The argument runs through a formal relation between uniform light-cone gauge and static gauge: T-dualizing the action along $X^-$ turns the uniform light-cone gauge condition $p_- = \text{const}$ into the static gauge condition $\tilde{X}^- = \sigma/(1-b)$. In that frame the T\bar{T}-deforming shift $X^+ \to X^+ + 2\delta a\, X^-$, $X^- \to X^-$ becomes a literal T-duality–shift–T-duality sequence, so the deformation is a genuine metric deformation that changes the global, not local, geometry. Since a TsT transformation is classically equivalent to twisting the boundary conditions of the two coordinates, the resulting change of the S-matrix is a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist $e^{i\delta a(p_j \omega_k(p_k) - p_k \omega_j(p_j))}$, exactly the CDD factor of T\bar{T} deformation. The authors verify the picture on pp-wave geometries (where the deformed spectrum is computed from the twisted Bethe-Yang equations) and on Lin-Lunin-Maldacena geometries (where the deformation is a shift $V_\phi \to V_\phi + \delta a$), and they note that at quartic order the latter coincides with an independently proposed deformation of N=4 super-Yang-Mills, differing at sixth order.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the formal equivalence between uniform light-cone gauge and static gauge obtained by T-dualizing along one light-cone coordinate; if this equivalence is only classical or breaks down when the light-cone direction is null, the interpretation of T\bar{T} as a TsT transformation collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A T\bar{T}-deformed string sigma model can be constructed from any background with two commuting shift isometries by a fixed TsT sequence, giving a solution-generating technique for deformed geometries.
  • The worldsheet S-matrix of the deformed model is the undeformed S-matrix multiplied by the universal CDD factor $e^{i\delta a(p_j \omega_k(p_k) - p_k \omega_j(p_j))}$, so integrability is inherited from the undeformed model.
  • The deformation changes only the global twisting of the target-space coordinates, not the local metric, explaining why T\bar{T} affects spectra and boundary conditions while leaving local diffeomorphism-invariant quantities untouched.
  • For pp-wave and flat-space backgrounds the deformed spectrum follows from quantizing momenta on the shifted volume $J + \delta a H_{\text{w.s.}}$, reproducing the known T\bar{T} spectrum formula; in flat space the deformation can trivialize the S-matrix.
  • For LLM geometries with an extra $u(1)$, the deformation is implemented by $V_\phi \to V_\phi + \delta a$, producing an explicit family of deformed supergravity backgrounds; at quartic order this matches a proposed irrelevant deformation of N=4 SYM but the two flows part ways at sixth order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not claimed in the paper: the same TsT mechanism should turn any classically integrable sigma model with two commuting shift isometries into a T\bar{T}-deformed integrable model, so the whole deformation is carried by the CDD phase; constructing the Lax pair of the TsT-deformed background would test this.
  • Since the paper works classically and bosonically, a natural check is whether the CDD phase receives quantum or fermionic corrections; the pp-wave example is simple enough for a one-loop computation.
  • The quartic-order agreement between the T\bar{T}-shifted geometry and the $\gamma$-deformed LLM geometry, with a sixth-order discrepancy, suggests the LLM flow is a different, generically non-integrable deformation that only mimics T\bar{T} perturbatively; higher-order scattering data could distinguish them.
  • If the equivalence extends to Ramond-Ramond backgrounds, a T\bar{T}-deformed AdS$_5\times S^5$ background would have a worldsheet S-matrix differing from the known one only by a CDD factor, providing a concrete holographic target for irrelevant deformations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the geometric interpretation of T\bar{T} deformations of two-dimensional sigma models in the framework of uniform light-cone gauge. The authors review how changing the gauge-frame parameter a in the uniform light-cone gauge mimics a T\bar{T} deformation when the worldsheet volume R is kept fixed, distinguishing genuine deformations from gauge-frame changes that leave the physical spectrum invariant. They then argue that, via a formal relation between uniform light-cone gauge and static gauge obtained by T-dualizing in X^- (following ref. [45]), the coordinate shift induced by changing a can be reinterpreted as a T-duality–shift–T-duality (TsT) transformation involving the two light-cone coordinates. In the static-gauge picture, the resulting CDD factor is identified with a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist of the worldsheet S matrix. As illustrations, the authors construct deformed geometries for pp-wave and Lin-Lunin-Maldacena backgrounds and discuss the deformed spectrum. The paper is explicitly limited to classical, bosonic NSNS sigma models; fermions, RR fields, and κ-symmetry are deferred to future work.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would establish a clean geometric interpretation of T\bar{T} deformations as TsT transformations in a T-dual frame and would explain the ubiquitous CDD factor as a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist. The explicit deformed backgrounds for pp-wave and LLM geometries provide concrete examples and a generating technique for deformed integrable models. The paper is written in a clear, self-contained style, and the classical derivations (e.g., the coordinate-shift analysis of Section 3.1 and the spectrum computation for pp-waves) are coherent. However, the main claim is substantially qualified by the singular nature of the T-duality in the light-cone direction at the undeformed point, as discussed in the major comments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3 and §4.4, eq. (3.9)] The central claim that a T\bar{T} deformation is a TsT transformation is not established at the undeformed point because the first T-duality in X^- is ill-defined when X^- is null. In the pp-wave example, G_-- = 0 at δa = 0, and the T-dual metric (4.20) diverges as δa → 0 (e.g., G_{\tilde Y^-\tilde Y^-} ~ 1/(8δa)). The authors acknowledge this in Section 4.4 and recast the sequence as an 'sT' transformation, never performing the first T-duality. This means the construction does not actually transform the original background by a TsT; it defines a deformed family and then T-dualizes only after the shift. The title and abstract therefore overstate the result. The authors should either provide a well-defined regularization of the null T-duality and show that the deformed background is independent of the regularization, or explicitly reformulate the claim as an 'sT' statement and adjust the title and abstract accordingly.
  2. [§4.4] The statement that the gauge-fixed Hamiltonian density from the singular background (4.20) is finite (and free) at δa = 0 is asserted but not proven. The divergence in the metric components as δa → 0 must cancel in the gauge-fixed Hamiltonian; a careful limit or a regulator would be needed to substantiate that the deformed theory is well-defined at the undeformed point. This is load-bearing because it is the mechanism by which the singular TsT is supposed to yield a finite T\bar{T} deformation.
  3. [§3.2] The formal relation between uniform light-cone gauge and static gauge via T-duality in X^- is taken from ref. [45] and is used as the bridge for the entire construction. However, the paper does not discuss the conditions (e.g., G_-- ≠ 0) under which this T-duality is well-defined for a general bosonic sigma model, nor does it address potential global obstructions. Given that the primary example has G_-- = 0 at the undeformed point, this gap directly affects the applicability of the argument. The authors should specify the regime of validity of the relation and state clearly where the construction is only formal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.4, eq. (3.14)] The notation \tilde P_+ and P_- in the intermediate expression for the Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist is inconsistent with the charges defined in (3.13); the correct combination is P_+(p_j) \tilde P_-(p_k) - \tilde P_-(p_j) P_+(p_k). As written, the expression is dimensionally inconsistent, although the final line is correct.
  2. [§6] The text contains typos (e.g., 'worldhseet', 'ligth-cone') and the name 'Drinfel'd-Reshtikin' should be 'Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin'.
  3. [§4, eq. (4.4)] The two sets of metric components in eq. (4.4) are not clearly separated; it would help to label which corresponds to the original coordinates and which to the shifted coordinates.
  4. [§4.3] Figure 1 is referenced in the text but does not appear in the manuscript provided; please ensure the figure is included in the final submission.
  5. [§3.2, eq. (3.6)] The T-dual momentum \tilde P_- is introduced without a definition; consider defining the T-dual momenta explicitly for readers unfamiliar with the notation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The DR-twist interpretation of the T-bar-T CDD factor is a consistency check that re-uses the known phase (2.22), but the TsT/global-geometry construction is independent and not a self-citation loop.

  1. renaming known result [Sec. 3.4, eqs. (3.12)-(3.14); cf. Sec. 2.2, eqs. (2.22)-(2.23)]
    "Considering for simplicity an S matrix of the form (2.22) such a twist would yield Sikij ijik (pj,pk)→Sikij ijik (pj,pk;δa) = e2iδa[ ~P+(pj)P−(pk)−P−(pj) ~P+(pk)]Sikij ijik (pj,pk) =eiδa[pjωik(pk)−pkωij (pj)]Sikij ijik (pj,pk). (3.14) We see that this precisely matches the CDD factor (2.23)."

    The DR-twist phase is not derived independently of the CDD factor: eq. (3.14) starts from 'an S matrix of the form (2.22)', i.e. from the known a-dependent phase (2.23) taken from ref. [57], and then evaluates the generic twist (3.12) with the gauge-fixing identifications P_+(p_j) = -ω_j(p_j) and \tilde P_-(p_j) = p_j/2. Substituting these values makes (3.14) reduce term-by-term to the same phase as (2.23), so the claimed 'natural interpretation' of the CDD factor as a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist is an equivalence/reformulation of the input phase, not a falsifiable prediction. The paper itself states that 'the TT CDD factor can be taken as a definition of such a deformation', confirming that the match is a consistency check.

full rationale

The paper's main geometric argument is not a self-citation loop. The uniform-light-cone-gauge/T-bar-T relation first attributed to ref. [24] is re-derived in Secs. 2.1-2.3, and the T-duality bridge between uniform light-cone gauge and static gauge is taken from the independent ref. [45] and then re-derived in Sec. 3.2. The TsT diagram (3.9) is assembled from the explicit coordinate shift (3.8) together with that T-duality relation, so it is a translation of the deformation into dual variables; the global-boundary-condition discussion (Sec. 3.4, pp-wave example) adds independent geometric content. The only genuinely circular-in-the-mild-sense step is the S-matrix conclusion in Sec. 3.4: eq. (3.14) starts from an S matrix of the form (2.22), whose phase is already the T-bar-T CDD factor (2.23), and reproduces that same phase by substituting the gauge-fixing charge identifications. This is a consistency check or renaming rather than a new derivation; the paper even says the CDD factor can be taken as a definition of the deformation. The null-X^- singularity at delta-a = 0 noted in Sec. 4.4 is a validity and singular-limit caveat for the TsT background, not a circularity. The LLM example is explicitly reverse-engineered from the shift, so it is an application rather than an independent prediction. Overall, the TsT/global-geometry part has independent content, and the circularity is partial and minor.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The TsT transformation is a known technique, and the deformation parameters delta_a and delta_b are couplings, not invented entities. The axioms are standard background results or domain assumptions about gauge fixing and T-duality that the paper cites rather than proves.

free parameters (2)
  • delta_a (T\bar{T} deformation parameter)
    Set by hand; proportional to the T\bar{T} deformation parameter. No data are fitted; it labels the family of deformed theories.
  • delta_b (generalized deformation parameter)
    Appears in the coordinate redefinition (3.1) for b-frame deformations; chosen by hand, not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The two-dimensional sigma model has at least two shift isometries (t and phi) that yield conserved charges E and J (Section 2.1, around eq. (2.3)).
    The uniform light-cone gauge construction and the T\bar{T} deformation require such isometries to define X^± and the charges.
  • domain assumption Uniform light-cone gauge fixing is classically equivalent to T-dualizing in X^- and fixing a static gauge (Section 3.2, based on ref. [45]).
    This equivalence is the bridge that converts the coordinate shift into a TsT transformation; it is cited from the literature and called 'formal' by the authors.
  • domain assumption A TsT transformation is classically equivalent to a twist of the boundary conditions of the involved coordinates (Section 3.4, refs. [47-49]).
    This justifies the Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist interpretation of the CDD factor.
  • domain assumption The a-dependence of the worldsheet S-matrix takes the CDD phase form e^{ia Phi(p_j,p_k)} with Phi = p_k omega(p_j) - p_j omega(p_k) (Section 2.2, eq. (2.22), ref. [57]).
    This is the known result that identifies the CDD factor (2.23) as the T\bar{T} CDD factor; the paper relies on it for the DR-twist comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $T\bar{T}$ deformations as TsT transformations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32D3KYUU

@misc{pith2026190809299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $T\barT$ deformations as TsT transformations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32D3KYUU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09299}
}
abstract

The relationship between $T\bar{T}$ deformations and the uniform light-cone gauge, first noted in arXiv:1804.01998, provides a powerful generating technique for deformed models. We recall this construction, distinguishing between changes of the gauge frame, which do not affect the theory, and genuine deformations. We investigate the geometric interpretation of the latter and argue that they affect the global features of the geometry before gauge fixing. Exploiting a formal relation between uniform light-cone gauge and static gauge in a T-dual frame, we interpret such a change as a TsT transformation involving the two light-cone coordinates. In the static-gauge picture, the $T\bar{T}$ CDD factor then has a natural interpretation as a Drinfel'd-Reshetikhin twist of the worldsheet S matrix. To illustrate these ideas, we find the geometries yielding a $T\bar{T}$ deformation of the worldsheet S matrix of pp-wave and Lin-Lunin-Maldacena backgrounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Integrability and Renormalization under $T \bar T$

    hep-th 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    At one loop, the renormalized Lagrangian of the T Tbar-deformed massive scalar splits the two quartic couplings, making g and h unequal, in contrast to the classical Lagrangian.

  2. Entanglement entropy and $T\bar T$ deformations beyond antipodal points from holography

    hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a holographic (A)dS spacetime with a hard radial cutoff, the entanglement entropy of any interval on the sphere equals the antipodal-point formula with radius R cos(beta_epsilon).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [45]

    Kruczenski and A

    M. Kruczenski and A. A. Tseytlin,Semiclassical relativistic strings inS5 and long coherent operators inN = 4 SYM theory, JHEP 0409 (2004) 038 [hep-th/0406189]

    arXiv 2004

  2. [1]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory, hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B915 (2017) 363 [1608.05499]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [3]

    Cavaglià, S

    A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi and R. Tateo,T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2016) 112 [1608.05534]. – 25 –

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    Bonelli, N

    G. Bonelli, N. Doroud and M. Zhu,T ¯T-deformations in closed form, JHEP 06 (2018) 149 [1804.10967]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [5]

    Conti, S

    R. Conti, S. Negro and R. Tateo,Conserved currents and T¯Ts irrelevant deformations of 2D integrable field theories, 1904.09141

    arXiv 1904

  7. [6]

    Conti, L

    R. Conti, L. Iannella, S. Negro and R. Tateo,Generalised Born-Infeld models, Lax operators and the TT perturbation, JHEP 11 (2018) 007 [1806.11515]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [7]

    B. Chen, L. Chen and P.-X. Hao,Entanglement entropy inTT-deformed CFT, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 086025 [1807.08293]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 94 references
  1. [8]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. Datta, A. Giveon, Y. Jiang and D. Kutasov,Modular invariance and uniqueness ofT ¯T deformed CFT, JHEP 01 (2019) 086 [1808.02492]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Cardy,TT deformations of non-Lorentz invariant field theories, 1809.07849

    J. Cardy,TT deformations of non-Lorentz invariant field theories, 1809.07849

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Araujo, E

    T. Araujo, E. Colgáin, Y. Sakatani, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and H. Yavartanoo,Holographic integration ofT ¯T & J ¯T via O(d,d ), JHEP 03 (2019) 168 [1811.03050]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Baggio, A

    M. Baggio, A. Sfondrini, G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli and H. Walsh,On TT deformations and supersymmetry, JHEP 06 (2019) 063 [1811.00533]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Chang, C

    C.-K. Chang, C. Ferko and S. Sethi,Supersymmetry andTT deformations, JHEP 04 (2019) 131 [1811.01895]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Jiang, A

    H. Jiang, A. Sfondrini and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,T ¯T deformations withN = (0, 2) supersymmetry, 1904.04760

    1904 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Chang, C

    C.-K. Chang, C. Ferko, S. Sethi, A. Sfondrini and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,T ¯T Flows and (2,2) Supersymmetry, 1906.00467

    1906 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Cribiori, F

    N. Cribiori, F. Farakos and R. von Unge,The 2D Volkov-Akulov model as aTT deformation, 1907.08150

    1907 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Dubovsky, V

    S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi,Asymptotic fragility, near AdS2 holography and TT, JHEP 09 (2017) 136 [1706.06604]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Dubovsky, V

    S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and G. Hernández-Chifflet,TT partition function from topological gravity, JHEP 09 (2018) 158 [1805.07386]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Conti, S

    R. Conti, S. Negro and R. Tateo,The TT perturbation and its geometric interpretation, JHEP 02 (2019) 085 [1809.09593]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Ishii, S

    T. Ishii, S. Okumura, J.-I. Sakamoto and K. Yoshida,Gravitational perturbations as T ¯T-deformations in 2D dilaton gravity systems, 1906.03865

    1906 arXiv

  13. [20]

    McGough, M

    L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde,Moving the CFT into the bulk withTT, JHEP 04 (2018) 010 [1611.03470]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Giveon, N

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,TT and LST, JHEP 07 (2017) 122 [1701.05576]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Giveon, N

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 12 (2017) 155 [1707.05800]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Asrat, A

    M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,Holography Beyond AdS, Nucl. Phys. B932 (2018) 241 [1711.02690]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Baggio and A

    M. Baggio and A. Sfondrini,Strings on NS-NS Backgrounds as Integrable Deformations, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 021902 [1804.01998]. – 26 –

    2018 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Dei and A

    A. Dei and A. Sfondrini,Integrable spin chain for stringy Wess-Zumino-Witten models, JHEP 07 (2018) 109 [1806.00422]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Gorbenko, E

    V. Gorbenko, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,dS/dS andTT, JHEP 03 (2019) 085 [1811.07965]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Dei and A

    A. Dei and A. Sfondrini,Integrable S matrix, mirror TBA and spectrum for the stringy AdS3×S3×S3×S1 WZW model, JHEP 02 (2019) 072 [1812.08195]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Giveon,Comments onT ¯T, J ¯T and String Theory, 1903.06883

    A. Giveon,Comments onT ¯T, J ¯T and String Theory, 1903.06883

    1903 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Giribet,T ¯T-deformations, AdS/CFT and correlation functions, JHEP 02 (2018) 114 [1711.02716]

    G. Giribet,T ¯T-deformations, AdS/CFT and correlation functions, JHEP 02 (2018) 114 [1711.02716]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Dubovsky, R

    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko,Solving the Simplest Theory of Quantum Gravity, JHEP 09 (2012) 133 [1205.6805]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Caselle, D

    M. Caselle, D. Fioravanti, F. Gliozzi and R. Tateo,Quantisation of the effective string with TBA, JHEP 07 (2013) 071 [1305.1278]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Integrable Hamiltonian for classical strings onAdS5× S5, JHEP 0502 (2005) 059 [hep-th/0411089]

    2005 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Uniform light-cone gauge for strings inAdS5× S5: Solving su(1|1) sector, JHEP 0601 (2006) 055 [hep-th/0510208]

    2006 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Arutyunov, S

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov and M. Zamaklar,Finite-size effects from giant magnons, Nucl. Phys. B778 (2007) 1 [hep-th/0606126]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Foundations of theAdS5× S5 superstring. part I, J. Phys. A A42 (2009) 254003 [0901.4937]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Frolov,TTbar deformation and the light-cone gauge, 1905.07946

    S. Frolov,TTbar deformation and the light-cone gauge, 1905.07946

    1905 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Frolov,TT, ~JJ, JT and ~JT deformations, 1907.12117

    S. Frolov,TT, ~JJ, JT and ~JT deformations, 1907.12117

    1907 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Guica,An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs, SciPost Phys

    M. Guica,An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs, SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 048 [1710.08415]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Bzowski and M

    A. Bzowski and M. Guica,The holographic interpretation ofJ ¯T-deformed CFTs, JHEP 01 (2019) 198 [1803.09753]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Nakayama,Very SpecialT ¯J deformed CFT, 1811.02173

    Y. Nakayama,Very SpecialT ¯J deformed CFT, 1811.02173

    arXiv

  34. [41]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov,JT deformed CFT2 and string theory, JHEP 10 (2018) 057 [1806.09667]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Le Floch and M

    B. Le Floch and M. Mezei,Solving a family ofT ¯T-like theories, 1903.07606

    1903 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Guica,On correlation functions inJ ¯T-deformed CFTs, 1902.01434

    M. Guica,On correlation functions inJ ¯T-deformed CFTs, 1902.01434

    1902 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov,T ¯T, J ¯T, T ¯J and String Theory, 1905.00051

    1905 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Lunin and J

    O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena,Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals, JHEP 05 (2005) 033 [hep-th/0502086]

    2005 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Frolov,Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background, JHEP 05 (2005) 069 [hep-th/0503201]

    S. Frolov,Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background, JHEP 05 (2005) 069 [hep-th/0503201]. – 27 –

    2005 arXiv

  40. [48]

    L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Green-Schwarz strings in TsT-transformed backgrounds, JHEP 0606 (2006) 018 [hep-th/0512253]

    2006 arXiv

  41. [49]

    S. J. Van Tongeren,On Yang–Baxter models, twist operators, and boundary conditions, J. Phys. A51 (2018) 305401 [1804.05680]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Beisert and R

    N. Beisert and R. Roiban,Beauty and the twist: The Bethe ansatz for twisted N=4 SYM, JHEP 08 (2005) 039 [hep-th/0505187]

    2005 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Drinfeld,Quasi Hopf algebras, Alg

    V. Drinfeld,Quasi Hopf algebras, Alg. Anal. 1N6 (1989) 114

    1989

  44. [52]

    Reshetikhin,Multiparameter quantum groups and twisted quasitriangular Hopf algebras, Lett

    N. Reshetikhin,Multiparameter quantum groups and twisted quasitriangular Hopf algebras, Lett. Math. Phys.20 (1990) 331

    1990

  45. [53]

    C. Ahn, Z. Bajnok, D. Bombardelli and R. I. Nepomechie,Twisted Bethe equations from a twisted S-matrix, JHEP 1102 (2011) 027 [1010.3229]

    2011 arXiv

  46. [54]

    C. Ahn, M. Kim and B.-H. Lee,Worldsheet S-matrix of beta-deformed SYM, Phys. Lett. B719 (2013) 458 [1211.4506]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Castillejo, R

    L. Castillejo, R. H. Dalitz and F. J. Dyson,Low’s scattering equation for the charged and neutral scalar theories, Phys. Rev. 101 (1956) 453

    1956

  48. [56]

    Beisert,The su(2|2) dynamic S-matrix, Adv

    N. Beisert,The su(2|2) dynamic S-matrix, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.12 (2008) 945 [hep-th/0511082]

    2008 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Arutyunov, S

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov and M. Zamaklar,The Zamolodchikov-Faddeev algebra for AdS5× S5 superstring, JHEP 0704 (2007) 002 [hep-th/0612229]

    2007 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Chervonyi and O

    Y. Chervonyi and O. Lunin,(Non)-Integrability of Geodesics in D-brane Backgrounds, JHEP 02 (2014) 061 [1311.1521]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Klose, T

    T. Klose, T. McLoughlin, R. Roiban and K. Zarembo,Worldsheet scattering inAdS5× S5, JHEP 0703 (2007) 094 [hep-th/0611169]

    2007 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Sundin and L

    P. Sundin and L. Wulff,Worldsheet scattering inAdS3/CFT2, JHEP 1307 (2013) 007 [1302.5349]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Lüscher,Volume dependence of the energy spectrum in massive quantum field theories

    M. Lüscher,Volume dependence of the energy spectrum in massive quantum field theories. 1. Stable particle states, Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 177

    1986

  54. [62]

    Lüscher,Volume dependence of the energy spectrum in massive quantum field theories

    M. Lüscher,Volume dependence of the energy spectrum in massive quantum field theories. 2. Scattering states, Commun. Math. Phys.105 (1986) 153

    1986

  55. [63]

    Yang and C

    C.-N. Yang and C. P. Yang,Thermodynamics of one-dimensional system of bosons with repulsive delta function interaction, J. Math. Phys.10 (1969) 1115

    1969

  56. [64]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz in relativistic models. Scaling three state Potts and Lee-Yang models, Nucl. Phys. B342 (1990) 695

    1990

  57. [65]

    Zarembo,Worldsheet spectrum inAdS4/CFT3 correspondence, JHEP 0904 (2009) 135 [0903.1747]

    K. Zarembo,Worldsheet spectrum inAdS4/CFT3 correspondence, JHEP 0904 (2009) 135 [0903.1747]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. J. van Tongeren,Double Wick rotating Green-Schwarz strings, JHEP 1505 (2015) 027 [1412.5137]

    2015 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena and H. S. Nastase,Strings in flat space and pp waves fromN = 4 super Yang Mills, JHEP 0204 (2002) 013 [hep-th/0202021]

    2002 arXiv

  60. [68]

    J. G. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin,On solvable models of type IIB superstring in NS-NS and R-R plane wave backgrounds, JHEP 0204 (2002) 021 [hep-th/0202179]. – 28 –

    2002 arXiv

  61. [69]

    A. Dei, M. R. Gaberdiel and A. Sfondrini,The plane-wave limit ofAdS3× S3× S3× S1, JHEP 08 (2018) 097 [1805.09154]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Hoare and A

    B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin,On string theory onAdS3× S3× T4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix, Nucl. Phys. B873 (2013) 682 [1303.1037]

    2013 arXiv

  63. [71]

    R. R. Metsaev and A. A. Tseytlin,Type IIB superstring action inAdS5× S5 background, Nucl. Phys. B533 (1998) 109 [hep-th/9805028]

    1998 arXiv

  64. [72]

    I. Bena, J. Polchinski and R. Roiban,Hidden symmetries of theAdS5× S5 superstring, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 046002 [hep-th/0305116]

    2004 arXiv

  65. [73]

    H. Lin, O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena,Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries, JHEP 10 (2004) 025 [hep-th/0409174]

    2004 arXiv

  66. [74]

    TT and Other Solvable Deformations of Quantum Field Theories

    L. Rastelli,A famous irrelevant deformation ofN = 4 SYM, talk at “TT and Other Solvable Deformations of Quantum Field Theories”,(2019) SCGP Stony Brook

    2019

  67. [75]

    Exploring a famous irrelevant deformation ofN = 4 SYM, talk at “Integrability in Gauge and String Theory 2019

    L. Rastelli,"Exploring a famous irrelevant deformation ofN = 4 SYM, talk at “Integrability in Gauge and String Theory 2019”,(2019) NORDITA Stockholm

    2019

  68. [76]

    K. A. Intriligator,Maximally supersymmetric RG flows and AdS duality, Nucl. Phys. B580 (2000) 99 [hep-th/9909082]

    2000 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Alishahiha and O

    M. Alishahiha and O. J. Ganor,Twisted backgrounds, PP waves and nonlocal field theories, JHEP 03 (2003) 006 [hep-th/0301080]

    2003 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Guica, F

    M. Guica, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and K. Zarembo,Integrability in dipole-deformedN = 4 super Yang-Mills, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 39 [1706.07957]

    2017 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Arutyunov, S

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, J. Plefka and M. Zamaklar,The off-shell symmetry algebra of the light-cone AdS5× S5 superstring, J. Phys. A40 (2007) 3583 [hep-th/0609157]

    2007 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Caetano, W

    J. Caetano, W. Peelaers and L. Rastelli,Supersymmetric RG flows in 4D and Integrability, (2019) to appear

    2019

  73. [81]

    Klimcik,On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model, J

    C. Klimcik,On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model, J. Math. Phys.50 (2009) 043508 [0802.3518]

    2009 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,An integrable deformation of theAdS5× S5 superstring action, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 051601 [1309.5850]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Kawaguchi, T

    I. Kawaguchi, T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,Jordanian deformations of theAdS5× S5 superstring, JHEP 1404 (2014) 153 [1401.4855]

    2014 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Osten and S

    D. Osten and S. J. van Tongeren,Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations, Nucl. Phys. B915 (2017) 184 [1608.08504]

    2017 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Matsumoto and K

    T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,Lunin-Maldacena backgrounds from the classical Yang-Baxter equation - towards the gravity/CYBE correspondence, JHEP 06 (2014) 135 [1404.1838]

    2014 arXiv

  78. [86]

    S. J. van Tongeren,On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS5×S5 superstring, JHEP 06 (2015) 048 [1504.05516]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Borsato and L

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff,Target space supergeometry ofη and λ-deformed strings, JHEP 10 (2016) 045 [1608.03570]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Sfondrini,Towards integrability forAdS3/CFT2, J

    A. Sfondrini,Towards integrability forAdS3/CFT2, J. Phys. A48 (2015) 023001 [1406.2971]. – 29 –

    2015 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Hoare, A

    B. Hoare, A. Stepanchuk and A. Tseytlin,Giant magnon solution and dispersion relation in string theory inAdS3× S3× T4 with mixed flux, Nucl. Phys. B879 (2014) 318 [1311.1794]

    2014 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Lloyd, O

    T. Lloyd, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefański, jr.,The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings onAdS3× S3× T4 with mixed three-form flux, Nucl. Phys. B891 (2015) 570 [1410.0866]

    2015 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Borsato, O

    R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefański, jr.,The AdS3× S3× S3× S1 worldsheet S matrix, J. Phys. A48 (2015) 415401 [1506.00218]

    2015 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Borsato and L

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff,Marginal deformations of WZW models and the classical Yang–Baxter equation, J. Phys. A52 (2019) 225401 [1812.07287]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Apolo and W

    L. Apolo and W. Song,Strings on warped AdS3 via T¯J deformations, JHEP 10 (2018) 165 [1806.10127]

    2018 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Apolo and W

    L. Apolo and W. Song,Heating up holography for single-traceJ ¯T deformations, 1907.03745. – 30 –

    1907 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.