REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 165 references
Quantum bits with Josephson junctions
T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read This review argues that the Josephson junction's cosine potential turns a superconducting circuit into an addressable qubit, opening new regimes of quantum computing and quantum optics.
desk verdict Pedagogically solid review of superconducting qubits, but Eq. (23) has a units error in the phase-qubit Hamiltonian that a referee should fix. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the Josephson junction itself, modeled as an ideal lumped element: a capacitance $C_J$ in parallel with a nonlinear inductance carrying energy $E_J(1-\cos\varphi)$, where $\varphi$ is the phase difference across the junction. The cosine potential is the load-bearing piece, because unlike the quadratic potential of an $LC$ resonator it produces unequal spacings between energy levels, and that anharmonicity is what makes a two-level qubit subspace addressable without exciting higher states. The organizing parameter of the whole family of qubits is the ratio $E_J/E_C$, which determines whether the charge number $n$ (charge-qubit regime) or the phase $\varphi$ (flux- and phase-qubit regimes) is the well-defined variable; the transmon exploits the large-ratio regime, where sensitivity to charge noise falls exponentially in $\sqrt{E_J/E_C}$ while the anharmonicity $\omega_{12}-\omega_{01} = -E_C/\hbar$ falls only linearly.
What would settle it
Take a transmon and tune $E_J/E_C$ over two decades by changing the flux through its SQUID loop while measuring the $|0\rangle\leftrightarrow|1\rangle$ and $|1\rangle\leftrightarrow|2\rangle$ transition frequencies: the chapter's Eqs. (25)-(26) predict exactly $\omega_{12}-\omega_{01} = -E_C/\hbar$, so a systematic deviation of the measured anharmonicity from this value, or a charge-noise sensitivity that fails to fall exponentially with $\sqrt{E_J/E_C}$, would show that the ideal single-phase junction model is incomplete.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The chapter's claim, stated on its own terms, is that a Josephson junction described by the Josephson equations $I_J = I_c \sin \varphi$ and $\dot\varphi = (2e/\hbar)V$ acts as a nonlinear inductance with energy $E_J(1-\cos\varphi)$, and that once such a junction is embedded in a superconducting circuit and quantized through node fluxes, a Legendre transformation, and canonical commutation relations, the resulting Hamiltonian describes an anharmonic multi-level system whose two lowest states form a qubit. The ratio $E_J/E_C$ between Josephson energy and charging energy decides which variable is well defined: the charge qubit lives at $E_J/E_C \ll 1$ with Hamiltonian $H = 4E_C(n-n_g)^2 - E_J\cos\varphi$, while the flux and phase qubits live at $E_J/E_C \gg 1$. The chapter further claims that refinements of these designs—most notably the transmon, which shunts the junction with a large capacitance to reach $E_J/E_C \sim 10^2$—have pushed coherence times into the hundreds of microseconds and have fulfilled the five DiVincenzo criteria (fabrication of many qubits, initialization, universal gates, readout, and sufficient coherence) to a reasonable degree in experiments. Finally, it claims that the same circuits, regarded as artificial atoms, have demonstrated ultrastrong and deep-strong coupling to photons, $\Delta$-type three-level transitions that natural atoms cannot have, and giant atoms coupled to a field at multiple wavelength-separated points.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that a Josephson junction can be treated as a single ideal electrical element described by the two Josephson equations, with one phase value across it and no dissipative losses; if quasiparticle dissipation or a phase that varies across the junction becomes significant at the operating frequencies and temperatures, every qubit Hamiltonian derived from this starting point would need revision.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the presented circuit quantization is accurate, all five DiVincenzo criteria have been fulfilled to a reasonable degree in experiments with Josephson-junction qubits, although scaling the control electronics to large systems remains an outstanding engineering challenge that the chapter itself states.
- The transmon trade-off follows from the chapter's perturbation theory: charge-noise sensitivity drops exponentially in $\sqrt{E_J/E_C}$ while the anharmonicity $\omega_{12}-\omega_{01} = -E_C/\hbar$ drops only linearly, which is why the transmon became the dominant design.
- Since the normalized coupling strength scales as $g \propto \alpha^{1/2}$ (or $\alpha^{-1/2}$) in circuit QED rather than $\alpha^{3/2}$, ultrastrong coupling with $\eta > 0.1$ and even deep strong coupling with $\eta > 1$ are reachable, and the Jaynes-Cummings model must give way to the full quantum Rabi Hamiltonian with its counter-rotating terms.
- A Josephson-junction qutrit tuned away from its symmetry point has all three transitions active (the $\Delta$-type configuration), which enables population inversion, weak-signal amplification, and microwave frequency up- and down-conversion.
- Giant atoms coupled to a waveguide at two points spaced $\lambda/2$ apart are protected from decaying into the waveguide, giving a frequency-dependent relaxation rate that can be engineered on a chip.
Reading between the lines
- If the giant-atom interference picture is correct, the same decay-free points and frequency-dependent relaxation should appear in any platform where an atom couples to a bosonic field at several points separated by distances comparable to the wavelength; a waveguide QED experiment with a different type of atom would test whether the mechanism is generic or specific to superconducting circuits.
- The chapter's reliance on the ideal lumped-junction model in Sec. 2 points to a precise boundary for all its Hamiltonians: deviations from the $E_J(1-\cos\varphi)$ potential should first appear in the higher energy levels, so monitoring the $|2\rangle\leftrightarrow|3\rangle$ transition of a transmon as the operating frequency approaches the junction plasma frequency could reveal the model's break
- The exponential-protection-versus-linear-anharmonicity trade-off identified for the transmon suggests a general design heuristic: push the protected operating ratio as far as fabrication tolerances allow, because the noise sensitivity falls much faster than the anharmonicity that limits gate speed.
- Since the paper shows that selection rules can be switched on and off by tuning through a sweet spot, an implicit extension is to modulate that control parameter in time, using parity as a dynamic switch for gating, amplifying, or converting signals at chosen frequencies.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This is a review chapter on Josephson-junction qubits. It introduces circuit quantization, derives the Hamiltonians of the charge, flux, and phase qubits, then discusses refined designs (transmon, fluxonium, etc.), quantum computing with these qubits, and their use in quantum optics and atomic physics. The stated aim is to explain the basic physics of superconducting quantum circuits and to show how they open new prospects for quantum information processing and quantum optics.
Significance. If the equations are corrected, this is a competent and useful pedagogical review of a mature field. The treatment of the Cooper-pair box, flux qubit, transmon, dispersive readout, and ultrastrong coupling follows standard literature and cites the primary sources extensively. The chapter is free of parameter fitting and makes no unfalsifiable predictions; as a review, that is appropriate. The main value is as a reference for newcomers; the main risk is that readers will reproduce the displayed Hamiltonians, so the prefactor errors in Eqs. (23), (35), and (36) must be fixed before the accuracy claim in the introduction can stand.
major comments (2)
- [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (23)] The kinetic term of the phase-qubit Hamiltonian is written as (2π/Φ0) p²/(2C_J), but the text defines the momentum by Q = 2ep/ħ, i.e., p = ħQ/(2e). With this definition, the charging energy is Q²/(2C_J) = (2e/ħ)² p²/(2C_J) = (2π/Φ0)² p²/(2C_J). As printed, the prefactor is missing one power of 2π/Φ0 and the first term does not have the correct dimensions of energy. A reader using Eq. (23) to compute the phase-qubit level spacing or transition frequency will obtain quantitatively wrong results. Please correct the prefactor to (2π/Φ0)², or redefine p consistently and adjust the text.
- [Sec. 6.1, Eqs. (35) and (36)] The Jaynes-Cummings and Rabi Hamiltonians are written as ħω01 σz, but with the Pauli-matrix convention used in Sec. 3.2 (σz = |e⟩⟨e| − |g⟩⟨g|, eigenvalues ±1), the qubit term should be (ħω01/2) σz. As written, the two-level transition energy is 2ħω01, which shifts the resonance conditions and all subsequent dynamics discussed in Sec. 6. Please introduce an explicit convention for σz or add the missing factor 1/2 in both Eq. (35) and Eq. (36).
minor comments (3)
- [Abstract] The abstract gives the book title as "Fundamentals and Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect"; the reference list in Ref. [1] gives "Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect". Please make the title consistent.
- [Sec. 2] The chapter adopts the lumped-element Josephson-junction model (a single phase φ, no quasiparticle dissipation) without explicitly stating its range of validity. A one-sentence remark that this approximation requires the junction to be small compared with the relevant wavelength and that quasiparticle effects are neglected would help the intended readership.
- [Sec. 5.4, Eq. (33)] The three-qubit product state in Eq. (33) is written without normalization factors in the individual qubit states; this is harmless but could be clarified by using (α|0⟩ + β|1⟩)⊗3.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; the chapter is a standard review whose derivations are self-contained textbook material benchmarked against external literature.
full rationale
This is a review chapter that quantizes circuits from the standard Josephson relations I_J = I_c sin(phi) and d(phi)/dt = (2e/hbar)V (Sec. 2, Eqs. (11)-(12)) to obtain Lagrangians and Hamiltonians (Eqs. (14), (18)-(21), (23)) by Legendre transformation and canonical commutation. No parameter is fitted from the quantities being 'predicted'; the Josephson energy E_J is an input, not a fitted output. The transmon formulas (24)-(26) are quoted from Koch et al. 2007, an external, independently published derivation, and the cited experiments provide external benchmarks. Author self-citations occur (e.g., Refs. [2], [22], [144], [161]), but they are introductory reading references and contextual pointers, not arguments that make a conclusion true by definition. The only concrete defect visible in the derivation chain is a dimensional/prefactor error in Eq. (23): with Q = 2ep/hbar, the charging term should be (2*pi/Phi_0)^2 p^2/(2C_J), so the printed prefactor (2*pi/Phi_0) is one power short. That is a correctness or typo issue, not a circularity issue; it does not mean the phase-qubit Hamiltonian was assumed in order to derive it. The chapter makes no independent quantitative predictions that reduce to its own inputs, so it receives a circularity score of 0.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption Josephson equations: I_J = I_c sin φ and dφ/dt = (2e/ħ)V
- standard math Lumped-element circuit model with node fluxes as generalized coordinates and canonical quantization [Φ, ∂L/∂Φ'] = iħ
- domain assumption Flux quantization condition Φ_ext = mΦ0 around a superconducting loop
- domain assumption Two-level approximation for the qubit subspace and validity of the rotating-wave approximation for weak coupling
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Quantum bits with Josephson junctions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZCVPWYMH
@misc{pith2026190809558,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Quantum bits with Josephson junctions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZCVPWYMH}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09558}
}
read the original abstract
Already in the first edition of this book (Barone and Paterno, "Fundamentals and Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect", Wiley 1982), a great number of interesting and important applications for Josephson junctions were discussed. In the decades that have passed since then, several new applications have emerged. This chapter treats one such new class of applications: quantum optics and quantum information processing (QIP) based on superconducting circuits with Josephson junctions. In this chapter, we aim to explain the basics of superconducting quantum circuits with Josephson junctions and demonstrate how these systems open up new prospects, both for QIP and for the study of quantum optics and atomic physics.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Barone and G
A. Barone and G. Paterno, Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect (Wiley, New York, 1982)
1982
-
[2]
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits,
X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y .-X. Liu, and F. Nori, “Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits,” Phys. Rep. 718-719, 1– 102 (2017), arXiv:1707.02046
arXiv 2017
-
[3]
Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review,
G. Wendin, “Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review,” Reports Prog. Phys.80, 106001 (2017), arXiv:1610.02208
arXiv 2017
-
[4]
Superconducting circuits and quantum information,
J. Q. You and F. Nori, “Superconducting circuits and quantum information,” Phys. Today 58, 42 (2005)
2005
-
[5]
Quantum bits with Josephson junctions (Re- view Article),
G. Wendin and V . S. Shumeiko, “Quantum bits with Josephson junctions (Re- view Article),” Low Temp. Phys.33, 724 (2007)
2007
-
[6]
Superconducting quantum bits,
J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, “Superconducting quantum bits,” Nature 453, 1031 (2008)
2008
-
[7]
Wiring up quantum systems,
R. J. Schoelkopf and S. M. Girvin, “Wiring up quantum systems,” Nature 451, 664 (2008)
2008
-
[8]
Atomic physics and quantum optics using supercon- ducting circuits,
J. Q. You and F. Nori, “Atomic physics and quantum optics using supercon- ducting circuits,” Nature 474, 589 (2011), arXiv:1202.1923
arXiv 2011
Show all 165 references
-
[9]
Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation,
I. Buluta, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation,” Reports Prog. Phys. 74, 104401 (2011), arXiv:1002.1871
2011 arXiv
-
[10]
A. M. Zagoskin, Quantum Engineering: Theory and Design of Quantum Co- herent Structures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)
2011
-
[11]
Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems,
Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, “Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623 (2013), arXiv:1204.2137
2013 arXiv
-
[12]
Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook,
M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook,” Science 339, 1169 (2013). Quantum bits with Josephson junctions 31
2013
-
[13]
Simulating physics with computers,
R. P. Feynman, “Simulating physics with computers,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.21, 467 (1982)
1982
-
[14]
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and fac- toring,
P. Shor, “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and fac- toring,” in Proc. 35th Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci. , SFCS ’94 (IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1994) p. 124
1994
-
[15]
Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack,
L. K. Grover, “Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack,” Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 325 (1997), arXiv:9706033 [quant-ph]
1997
-
[16]
Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations,
A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, “Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009), arXiv:0811.3171
2009 arXiv
-
[17]
Quantum algorithms: an overview,
A. Montanaro, “Quantum algorithms: an overview,” npj Quantum Inf. 2, 15023 (2016), arXiv:1511.04206
2016 arXiv
-
[18]
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Infor- mation (Cambridge University Press, 2000)
2000
-
[19]
Quantum network theory,
B. Yurke and J. S. Denker, “Quantum network theory,” Phys. Rev. A29, 1419 (1984)
1984
-
[20]
Quantum fluctuations in electrical circuits,
M. H. Devoret, “Quantum fluctuations in electrical circuits,” in Quantum Fluctuations Les Houches Sess. LXIII , edited by S. Reynaud, E. Giacobino, and J. Zinn-Justin (North Holland, 1997)
1997
-
[21]
Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits,
U. V ool and M. Devoret, “Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits,” Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 45, 897 (2017), arXiv:1610.03438
2017 arXiv
-
[22]
A. F. Kockum, Quantum optics with artificial atoms, Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (2014)
2014
-
[23]
Goldstein, Classical Mechanics , 2nd ed
H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics , 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1980)
1980
-
[24]
Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed
M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996)
1996
-
[25]
C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2005)
2005
-
[26]
Quantum Coherence with a Single Cooper Pair,
V . Bouchiat, D. Vion, P. Joyez, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, “Quantum Coherence with a Single Cooper Pair,” Phys. Scr.T76, 165 (1998)
1998
-
[27]
Coherent control of macro- scopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box,
Y . Nakamura, Y . A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, “Coherent control of macro- scopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box,” Nature 398, 786 (1999), arXiv:9904003 [cond-mat]
1999
-
[28]
Josephson charge qubits: a brief review,
Y . A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, T. Yamamoto, Y . Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, “Josephson charge qubits: a brief review,” Quantum Inf. Process. 8, 55 (2009)
2009
-
[29]
J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1994)
1994
-
[30]
Superconducting persistent-current qubit,
T. P. Orlando, J. E. Mooij, L. Tian, C. H. van der Wal, L. S. Levitov, S. Lloyd, and J. J. Mazo, “Superconducting persistent-current qubit,” Phys. Rev. B60, 15398 (1999), arXiv:9908283 [cond-mat]
1999
-
[31]
Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit,
J. E. Mooij, T. P. Orlando, L. Levitov, L. Tian, C. H. van der Wal, and S. Lloyd, “Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit,” Science285, 1036 (1999). 32 Anton Frisk Kockum and Franco Nori
1999
-
[32]
Quantum Superposition of Macroscopic Persistent-Current States,
C. H. van der Wal, A. C. J. ter Haar, F. K. Wilhelm, R. N. Schouten, C. J. P. M. Harmans, T. P. Orlando, S. Lloyd, and J. E. Mooij, “Quantum Superposition of Macroscopic Persistent-Current States,” Science 290, 773 (2000)
2000
-
[33]
Quan- tum superposition of distinct macroscopic states,
J. R. Friedman, V . Patel, W. Chen, S. K. Tolpygo, and J. E. Lukens, “Quan- tum superposition of distinct macroscopic states,” Nature 406, 43 (2000)
2000
-
[34]
Coherent Quantum Dynamics of a Superconducting Flux Qubit,
I. Chiorescu, Y . Nakamura, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, “Coherent Quantum Dynamics of a Superconducting Flux Qubit,” Science 299, 1869 (2003)
2003
-
[35]
Energy-Level Quantization in the Zero-V oltage State of a Current-Biased Josephson Junction,
J. M. Martinis, M. H. Devoret, and J. Clarke, “Energy-Level Quantization in the Zero-V oltage State of a Current-Biased Josephson Junction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1543 (1985)
1985
-
[36]
Quantum Mechanics of a Macroscopic Variable: The Phase Difference of a Josephson Junction,
J. Clarke, A. N. Cleland, M. H. Devoret, D. Esteve, and J. M. Martinis, “Quantum Mechanics of a Macroscopic Variable: The Phase Difference of a Josephson Junction,” Science 239, 992 (1988)
1988
-
[37]
Macroscopic Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen pairs in superconducting circuits,
L. F. Wei, Y .-X. Liu, M. J. Storcz, and F. Nori, “Macroscopic Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen pairs in superconducting circuits,” Phys. Rev. A73, 052307 (2006), arXiv:0508027 [quant-ph]
2006
-
[38]
Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits,
M. Ansmann, H. Wang, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, J. Wenner, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits,” Nature 461, 504 (2009)
2009
-
[39]
Superconducting phase qubits,
J. M. Martinis, “Superconducting phase qubits,” Quantum Inf. Process. 8, 81 (2009)
2009
-
[40]
Charge- insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box,
J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Charge- insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box,” Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007), arXiv:0703002 [cond-mat]
2007
-
[41]
Superconducting qubits,
A. Zagoskin and A. Blais, “Superconducting qubits,” Phys. Canada 63, 215 (2007), arXiv:0805.0164
2007 arXiv
-
[42]
Low-decoherence flux qubit,
J. Q. You, X. Hu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Low-decoherence flux qubit,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 140515 (2007), arXiv:0609225 [cond-mat]
2007
-
[43]
Tuning the Gap of a Superconducting Flux Qubit,
F. G. Paauw, A. Fedorov, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, “Tuning the Gap of a Superconducting Flux Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 090501 (2009)
2009
-
[44]
Semiconductor-Nanowire-Based Supercon- ducting Qubit,
T. W. Larsen, K. D. Petersson, F. Kuemmeth, T. S. Jespersen, P. Krogstrup, J. Nyg˚ard, and C. M. Marcus, “Semiconductor-Nanowire-Based Supercon- ducting Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 127001 (2015), arXiv:1503.08339
2015 arXiv
-
[45]
Re- alization of Microwave Quantum Circuits Using Hybrid Superconducting- Semiconducting Nanowire Josephson Elements,
G. de Lange, B. van Heck, A. Bruno, D. J. van Woerkom, A. Geresdi, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, A. R. Akhmerov, and L. DiCarlo, “Re- alization of Microwave Quantum Circuits Using Hybrid Superconducting- Semiconducting Nanowire Josephson Elements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115,...
2015 arXiv
-
[46]
Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit,
D. Vion, A. Aasime, A. Cottet, P. Joyez, H. Pothier, C. Urbina, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, “Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit,” Science 296, 886 (2002). Quantum bits with Josephson junctions 33
2002
-
[47]
Millisecond charge-parity fluctuations and induced decoher- ence in a superconducting transmon qubit,
D. Rist `e, C. C. Bultink, M. J. Tiggelman, R. N. Schouten, K. W. Lehnert, and L. DiCarlo, “Millisecond charge-parity fluctuations and induced decoher- ence in a superconducting transmon qubit,” Nat. Commun. 4, 1913 (2013), arXiv:1212.5459
2013 arXiv
-
[48]
Thermal and Residual Excited-State Population in a 3D Transmon Qubit,
X. Y . Jin, A. Kamal, A. P. Sears, T. Gudmundsen, D. Hover, J. Miloshi, R. Slattery, F. Yan, J. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “Thermal and Residual Excited-State Population in a 3D Transmon Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 240501 (2015), arXiv:1412.2772
2015 arXiv
-
[49]
The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility,
F. Yan, S. Gustavsson, A. Kamal, J. Birenbaum, A. P. Sears, D. Hover, T. J. Gudmundsen, D. Rosenberg, G. Samach, S. Weber, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Or- lando, J. Clarke, A. J. Kerman, and W. D. Oliver, “The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility,” Nat. Commun. ...
2016 arXiv
-
[50]
State Tomog- raphy of Capacitively Shunted Phase Qubits with High Fidelity,
M. Steffen, M. Ansmann, R. McDermott, N. Katz, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, E. M. Weig, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “State Tomog- raphy of Capacitively Shunted Phase Qubits with High Fidelity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050502 (2006), arXiv:0602432 [cond-mat]
2006
-
[51]
Fluxonium: Single Cooper-Pair Circuit Free of Charge Offsets,
V . E. Manucharyan, J. Koch, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, “Fluxonium: Single Cooper-Pair Circuit Free of Charge Offsets,” Science326, 113 (2009), arXiv:0906.0831
2009 arXiv
-
[52]
Coherent suppression of electromagnetic dissipation due to superconducting quasiparticles,
I. M. Pop, K. Geerlings, G. Catelani, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, “Coherent suppression of electromagnetic dissipation due to superconducting quasiparticles,” Nature 508, 369 (2014)
2014
-
[53]
Coherent Josephson Qubit Suit- able for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits,
R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, Y . Chen, Y . Yin, B. Chiaro, J. Mutus, C. Neill, P. O’Malley, P. Roushan, J. Wenner, T. C. White, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “Coherent Josephson Qubit Suit- able for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits,” Phys. Re...
2013 arXiv
-
[54]
Qubit Architecture with High Coherence and Fast Tunable Coupling,
Y . Chen, C. Neill, P. Roushan, N. Leung, M. Fang, R. Barends, J. Kelly, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, A. Megrant, J. Y . Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. M. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wen- ner, T. C. White, M. R. Geller, A. N. Cleland, and ...
2014 arXiv
-
[55]
The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation,
D. P. DiVincenzo, “The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation,” Fortschritte der Phys. 48, 771 (2000), arXiv:0002077 [quant-ph]
2000
-
[56]
Quantum Two- Level Systems in Josephson Junctions as Naturally Formed Qubits,
A. M. Zagoskin, S. Ashhab, J. R. Johansson, and F. Nori, “Quantum Two- Level Systems in Josephson Junctions as Naturally Formed Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 077001 (2006), arXiv:0603753 [cond-mat]
2006
-
[57]
Process tomog- raphy of quantum memory in a Josephson-phase qubit coupled to a two-level state,
M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, N. Katz, E. Lucero, A. O’Connell, H. Wang, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “Process tomog- raphy of quantum memory in a Josephson-phase qubit coupled to a two-level state,” Nat. Phys. 4, 523 (2008)
2008
-
[58]
The quantum internet,
H. J. Kimble, “The quantum internet,” Nature 453, 1023 (2008), arXiv:0806.4195. 34 Anton Frisk Kockum and Franco Nori
2008 arXiv
-
[59]
Initialization by Measurement of a Superconducting Quantum Bit Circuit,
D. Rist `e, J. G. van Leeuwen, H.-S. Ku, K. W. Lehnert, and L. DiCarlo, “Initialization by Measurement of a Superconducting Quantum Bit Circuit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050507 (2012), arXiv:1204.2479
2012 arXiv
-
[60]
Heralded State Preparation in a Superconducting Qubit,
J. E. Johnson, C. Macklin, D. H. Slichter, R. Vijay, E. B. Weingarten, J. Clarke, and I. Siddiqi, “Heralded State Preparation in a Superconducting Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 050506 (2012), arXiv:1202.5541
2012 arXiv
-
[61]
Fast reset and suppressing spon- taneous emission of a superconducting qubit,
M. D. Reed, B. R. Johnson, A. A. Houck, L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Fast reset and suppressing spon- taneous emission of a superconducting qubit,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 203110 (2010), arXiv:1003.0142
2010 arXiv
-
[62]
Demonstrating a Driven Reset Pro- tocol for a Superconducting Qubit,
K. Geerlings, Z. Leghtas, I. M. Pop, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, “Demonstrating a Driven Reset Pro- tocol for a Superconducting Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 120501 (2013), arXiv:1211.0491
2013 arXiv
-
[63]
Superconducting quan- tum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance,
R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, A. Veitia, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, J. Mutus, A. G. Fowler, B. Campbell, Y . Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, C. Neill, P. O’Malley, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “Sup...
2014
-
[64]
Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative random- ized benchmarking,
S. Sheldon, L. S. Bishop, E. Magesan, S. Filipp, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, “Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative random- ized benchmarking,” Phys. Rev. A93, 012301 (2016), arXiv:1504.06597
2016 arXiv
-
[65]
Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate,
S. Sheldon, E. Magesan, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, “Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 060302 (2016), arXiv:1603.04821
2016 arXiv
-
[66]
Imple- mentation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits,
A. Fedorov, L. Steffen, M. Baur, M. P. da Silva, and A. Wallraff, “Imple- mentation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits,” Nature 481, 170 (2012), arXiv:1108.3966
2012 arXiv
-
[67]
Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits,
M. D. Reed, L. DiCarlo, S. E. Nigg, L. Sun, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits,” Nature 482, 382 (2012)
2012
-
[68]
Superconducting qubits: poised for computing?
I. Siddiqi, “Superconducting qubits: poised for computing?” Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 091002 (2011)
2011
-
[69]
Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation,
A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004), arXiv:0402216 [cond-mat]
2004
-
[70]
Reversal of the Weak Measurement of a Quantum State in a Superconduct- ing Phase Qubit,
N. Katz, M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, A. O’Connell, H. Wang, A. N. Cleland, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Korotkov, “Reversal of the Weak Measurement of a Quantum State in a Superconduct- ing Phase Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 200401 (2008), arXiv...
2008 arXiv
-
[71]
Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,
A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010), arXiv:0810.4729. Quantum bits with Josephson junctions 35
2010 arXiv
-
[72]
Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with supercon- ducting circuits,
P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, and F. Nori, “Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with supercon- ducting circuits,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1 (2012), arXiv:1103.0835
2012 arXiv
-
[73]
Introduction to parametric amplification of quan- tum signals with Josephson circuits,
A. Roy and M. Devoret, “Introduction to parametric amplification of quan- tum signals with Josephson circuits,” Comptes Rendus Phys.17, 740 (2016), arXiv:1605.00539
2016 arXiv
-
[74]
Single-shot qubit readout in circuit quantum electrodynamics,
F. Mallet, F. R. Ong, A. Palacios-Laloy, F. Nguyen, P. Bertet, D. Vion, and D. Esteve, “Single-shot qubit readout in circuit quantum electrodynamics,” Nat. Phys. 5, 791 (2010), arXiv:1005.3436
2010 arXiv
-
[75]
Materials in superconducting quantum bits,
W. D. Oliver and P. B. Welander, “Materials in superconducting quantum bits,” MRS Bull. 38, 816 (2013)
2013
-
[76]
Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits,
A. Blais, A. M. van den Brink, and A. M. Zagoskin, “Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 127901 (2003), arXiv:0207112 [cond-mat]
2003
-
[77]
Entangled Macroscopic Quantum States in Two Superconducting Qubits,
A. J. Berkley, H. Xu, R. C. Ramos, M. A. Gubrud, F. W. Strauch, P. R. John- son, J. R. Anderson, A. J. Dragt, C. J. Lobb, and F. C. Wellstood, “Entangled Macroscopic Quantum States in Two Superconducting Qubits,” Science300, 1548 (2003)
2003
-
[78]
Simultaneous State Mea- surement of Coupled Josephson Phase Qubits,
R. McDermott, R. W. Simmonds, M. Steffen, K. B. Cooper, K. Cicak, K. D. Osborn, S. Oh, D. P. Pappas, and J. M. Martinis, “Simultaneous State Mea- surement of Coupled Josephson Phase Qubits,” Science 307, 1299 (2005)
2005
-
[79]
Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus,
J. Majer, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, J. Koch, B. R. Johnson, J. A. Schreier, L. Frunzio, D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, A. Wallraff, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus,” Nature449, 443 (2007), arXiv:0709.2135
2007 arXiv
-
[80]
Coherent quantum state storage and transfer between two phase qubits via a resonant cavity,
M. A. Sillanp ¨a¨a, J. I. Park, and R. W. Simmonds, “Coherent quantum state storage and transfer between two phase qubits via a resonant cavity,” Nature 449, 438 (2007), arXiv:0709.2341
2007 arXiv
-
[81]
Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits,
A. D. C ´orcoles, E. Magesan, S. J. Srinivasan, A. W. Cross, M. Steffen, J. M. Gambetta, and J. M. Chow, “Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits,” Nat. Commun.6, 6979 (2015), arXiv:1410.6419
2015 arXiv
-
[82]
Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit,
R. Barends, A. Shabani, L. Lamata, J. Kelly, A. Mezzacapo, U. Las Heras, R. Babbush, A. G. Fowler, B. Campbell, Y . Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, E. Lucero, A. Megrant, J. Y . Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Neill, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. Quintana, P. Roushan, D. Sank...
2016
-
[83]
Josephson-junction qubits with controlled couplings,
Y . Makhlin, G. Sch ¨on, and A. Shnirman, “Josephson-junction qubits with controlled couplings,” Nature 398, 305 (1999)
1999
-
[84]
Scalable Quantum Computing with Josephson Charge Qubits,
J. Q. You, J. S. Tsai, and F. Nori, “Scalable Quantum Computing with Josephson Charge Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 197902 (2002), arXiv:0306209 [cond-mat]. 36 Anton Frisk Kockum and Franco Nori
2002
-
[85]
Protocol for Universal Gates in Opti- mally Biased Superconducting Qubits,
C. Rigetti, A. Blais, and M. Devoret, “Protocol for Universal Gates in Opti- mally Biased Superconducting Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 240502 (2005), arXiv:0412009 [quant-ph]
2005
-
[86]
Controllable Coupling between Flux Qubits,
Y .-X. Liu, L. F. Wei, J. S. Tsai, and F. Nori, “Controllable Coupling between Flux Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 067003 (2006), arXiv:0507496 [cond-mat]
2006
-
[87]
Switchable resonant coupling of flux qubits,
M. Grajcar, Y .-X. Liu, F. Nori, and A. M. Zagoskin, “Switchable resonant coupling of flux qubits,” Phys. Rev. B 74, 172505 (2006), arXiv:0605484 [cond-mat]
2006
-
[88]
Interqubit coupling medi- ated by a high-excitation-energy quantum object,
S. Ashhab, A. O. Niskanen, K. Harrabi, Y . Nakamura, T. Picot, P. C. de Groot, C. J. P. M. Harmans, J. E. Mooij, and F. Nori, “Interqubit coupling medi- ated by a high-excitation-energy quantum object,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 014510 (2008), arXiv:0709.0237
2008 arXiv
-
[89]
Solid-State Qubits with Current-Controlled Cou- pling,
T. Hime, P. A. Reichardt, B. L. T. Plourde, T. L. Robertson, C.-E. Wu, A. V . Ustinov, and J. Clarke, “Solid-State Qubits with Current-Controlled Cou- pling,” Science 314, 1427 (2006)
2006
-
[90]
Quantum Coherent Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits,
A. O. Niskanen, K. Harrabi, F. Yoshihara, Y . Nakamura, S. Lloyd, and J. S. Tsai, “Quantum Coherent Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits,” Science 316, 723 (2007)
2007
-
[91]
Fast Tunable Coupler for Super- conducting Qubits,
R. C. Bialczak, M. Ansmann, M. Hofheinz, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Nee- ley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, T. Ya- mamoto, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “Fast Tunable Coupler for Super- conducting Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 060501 (2011), arX...
2011 arXiv
-
[92]
Universal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus,
D. C. McKay, S. Filipp, A. Mezzacapo, E. Magesan, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, “Universal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 064007 (2016), arXiv:1604.03076
2016 arXiv
-
[93]
An efficient and compact switch for quantum circuits,
Y . Wu, L.-P. Yang, M. Gong, Y . Zheng, H. Deng, Z. Yan, Y . Zhao, K. Huang, A. D. Castellano, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, D.-N. Zheng, C. P. Sun, Y .-X. Liu, X. Zhu, and L. Lu, “An efficient and compact switch for quantum circuits,” npj Quantum Inf. 4, 50 (2018), arXiv:1605.06747
2018 arXiv
-
[94]
A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem,
E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, J. Lapan, A. Lundgren, and D. Preda, “A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem,” Science 292, 472 (2001), arXiv:0104129 [quant- ph]
2001
-
[95]
Adiabatic quantum computation,
T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, “Adiabatic quantum computation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018), arXiv:1611.04471
2018 arXiv
-
[96]
Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Com- putation,
D. Aharonov, W. van Dam, J. Kempe, Z. Landau, S. Lloyd, and O. Regev, “Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Com- putation,” in45th Annu. IEEE Symp. Found. Comput. Sci.(IEEE, 2004) p. 42, arXiv:0405098 [quant-ph]
2004
-
[97]
Colloquium: Quantum annealing and analog quantum computation,
A. Das and B. K. Chakrabarti, “Colloquium: Quantum annealing and analog quantum computation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1061 (2008), arXiv:0801.2193
2008 arXiv
-
[98]
Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits,
S. Boixo, T. F. Rønnow, S. V . Isakov, Z. Wang, D. Wecker, D. A. Lidar, J. M. Martinis, and M. Troyer, “Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits,” Nat. Phys. 10, 218 (2014). Quantum bits with Josephson junctions 37
2014
-
[99]
Error-corrected quan- tum annealing with hundreds of qubits,
K. L. Pudenz, T. Albash, and D. A. Lidar, “Error-corrected quan- tum annealing with hundreds of qubits,” Nat. Commun. 5, 3243 (2014), arXiv:1307.8190
2014 arXiv
-
[100]
Defining and detecting quantum speedup,
T. F. Ronnow, Z. Wang, J. Job, S. Boixo, S. V . Isakov, D. Wecker, J. M. Marti- nis, D. A. Lidar, and M. Troyer, “Defining and detecting quantum speedup,” Science 345, 420 (2014)
2014
-
[101]
How to test the “quantumness
A. M. Zagoskin, E. Il’ichev, M. Grajcar, J. J. Betouras, and F. Nori, “How to test the “quantumness” of a quantum computer?” Front. Phys.2, 30 (2014)
2014
-
[102]
Quantum ver- sus classical annealing of Ising spin glasses,
B. Heim, T. F. Ronnow, S. V . Isakov, and M. Troyer, “Quantum ver- sus classical annealing of Ising spin glasses,” Science 348, 215 (2015), arXiv:1411.5693
2015 arXiv
-
[103]
What is the Computational Value of Finite-Range Tunneling?
V . S. Denchev, S. Boixo, S. V . Isakov, N. Ding, R. Babbush, V . Smelyanskiy, J. Martinis, and H. Neven, “What is the Computational Value of Finite-Range Tunneling?” Phys. Rev. X6, 031015 (2016), arXiv:1512.02206
2016 arXiv
-
[104]
Quantum Simulators,
I. Buluta and F. Nori, “Quantum Simulators,” Science 326, 108 (2009)
2009
-
[105]
Quantum simulation,
I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Quantum simulation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014), arXiv:1308.6253
2014 arXiv
-
[106]
Emulation of a Quantum Spin with a Superconducting Phase Qudit,
M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, J. Wenner, A. N. Cleland, M. R. Geller, and J. M. Martinis, “Emulation of a Quantum Spin with a Superconducting Phase Qudit,” Science 325, 722 (2009)
2009
-
[107]
Quantum Football,
F. Nori, “Quantum Football,” Science 325, 689 (2009)
2009
-
[108]
Measuring a Topological Transition in an Artificial Spin-1/2 System,
M. D. Schroer, M. H. Kolodrubetz, W. F. Kindel, M. Sandberg, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, D. P. Pappas, A. Polkovnikov, and K. W. Lehnert, “Measuring a Topological Transition in an Artificial Spin-1/2 System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 050402 (2014), arXiv:1406.1817
2014 arXiv
-
[109]
Observation of topological transitions in interacting quan- tum circuits,
P. Roushan, C. Neill, Y . Chen, M. Kolodrubetz, C. Quintana, N. Leung, M. Fang, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, J. Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, A. Polkovnikov, A. N. Cleland...
2014 arXiv
-
[110]
Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a synthetic magnetic field,
P. Roushan, C. Neill, A. Megrant, Y . Chen, R. Babbush, R. Barends, B. Camp- bell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, E. Kapit, H. Neve...
2017 arXiv
-
[111]
Quantum emulation of a spin sys- tem with topologically protected ground states using superconducting quan- tum circuits,
J. Q. You, X.-F. Shi, X. Hu, and F. Nori, “Quantum emulation of a spin sys- tem with topologically protected ground states using superconducting quan- tum circuits,” Phys. Rev. B81, 014505 (2010)
2010
-
[112]
Emulating Anyonic Fractional Statistical Behavior in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit,
Y . P. Zhong, D. Xu, P. Wang, C. Song, Q. J. Guo, W. X. Liu, K. Xu, B. X. Xia, C.-Y . Lu, S. Han, J.-W. Pan, and H. Wang, “Emulating Anyonic Fractional Statistical Behavior in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110501 (2016), arXiv:1608.04890. 38 Anton F...
2016 arXiv
-
[113]
Emulating weak localization using a solid-state quantum circuit,
Y . Chen, P. Roushan, D. Sank, C. Neill, E. Lucero, M. Mariantoni, R. Barends, B. Chiaro, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, J. Y . Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, Y . Yin, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “Emulating weak localization using a solid-state...
2014 arXiv
-
[114]
On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits,
A. A. Houck, H. E. T ¨ureci, and J. Koch, “On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits,” Nat. Phys. 8, 292 (2012)
2012
-
[115]
Quantum simulations and many-body physics with light,
C. Noh and D. G. Angelakis, “Quantum simulations and many-body physics with light,” Reports Prog. Phys. 80, 016401 (2017), arXiv:1604.04433
2017 arXiv
-
[116]
Imaging Photon Lattice States by Scanning Defect Microscopy,
D. L. Underwood, W. E. Shanks, A. C. Y . Li, L. Ateshian, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, “Imaging Photon Lattice States by Scanning Defect Microscopy,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 021044 (2016), arXiv:1510.08428
2016 arXiv
-
[117]
Observation of a Dissipative Phase Transition in a One-Dimensional Circuit QED Lattice,
M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y . Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, “Observation of a Dissipative Phase Transition in a One-Dimensional Circuit QED Lattice,” Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017), arXiv:1607.06895
2017 arXiv
-
[118]
Scalable Quantum Simulation of Molecular Energies,
P. J. J. O’Malley, R. Babbush, I. D. Kivlichan, J. Romero, J. R. McClean, R. Barends, J. Kelly, P. Roushan, A. Tranter, N. Ding, B. Campbell, Y . Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. G. Fowler, E. Jeffrey, E. Lucero, A. Megrant, J. Y . Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Neill, C. Quin...
2016 arXiv
-
[119]
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets,
A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, “Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets,” Nature 549, 242 (2017), arXiv:1704.05018
2017 arXiv
-
[120]
Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers,
M. Reiher, N. Wiebe, K. M. Svore, D. Wecker, and M. Troyer, “Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 7555 (2017), arXiv:1605.03590
2017 arXiv
-
[121]
Quantum error correction for beginners,
S. J. Devitt, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, “Quantum error correction for beginners,” Reports Prog. Phys. 76, 076001 (2013), arXiv:0905.2794
2013 arXiv
-
[122]
Quantum error correction for quantum memories,
B. M. Terhal, “Quantum error correction for quantum memories,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307 (2015), arXiv:1302.3428
2015 arXiv
-
[123]
A single quantum cannot be cloned,
W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, “A single quantum cannot be cloned,” Na- ture 299, 802 (1982)
1982
-
[124]
Communication by EPR devices,
D. Dieks, “Communication by EPR devices,” Phys. Lett. A 92, 271 (1982)
1982
-
[125]
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer mem- ory,
P. W. Shor, “Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer mem- ory,” Phys. Rev. A52, R2493 (1995)
1995
-
[126]
Multiple-Particle Interference and Quantum Error Correction,
A. Steane, “Multiple-Particle Interference and Quantum Error Correction,” Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 452, 2551 (1996)
1996
-
[127]
Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,
E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,” Phys. Rev. A 55, 900 (1997)
1997
-
[128]
State preser- vation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit,
J. Kelly, R. Barends, A. G. Fowler, A. Megrant, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, D. Sank, J. Y . Mutus, B. Campbell, Y . Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, I.-C. Hoi, C. Neill, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. Quintana, P. Roushan, Quantum bits with Josephson junctions 39 A. Vainsencher, J....
2015 arXiv
-
[129]
Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary,
S. B. Bravyi and A. Y . Kitaev, “Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary,” (1998), arXiv:9811052 [quant-ph]
1998
-
[130]
Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation,
A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, “Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A86, 032324 (2012), arXiv:1208.0928
2012 arXiv
-
[131]
Demonstration of Weight-Four Parity Mea- surements in the Surface Code Architecture,
M. Takita, A. D. C ´orcoles, E. Magesan, B. Abdo, M. Brink, A. Cross, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, “Demonstration of Weight-Four Parity Mea- surements in the Surface Code Architecture,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210505 (2016), arXiv:1605.01351
2016 arXiv
-
[132]
Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes,
V . V . Albert, K. Noh, K. Duivenvoorden, D. J. Young, R. T. Brierley, P. Rein- hold, C. Vuillot, L. Li, C. Shen, S. M. Girvin, B. M. Terhal, and L. Jiang, “Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes,” Phys. Rev. A97, 032346 (2018), arXiv:1708.05010
2018 arXiv
-
[133]
Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correc- tion in superconducting circuits,
N. Ofek, A. Petrenko, R. Heeres, P. Reinhold, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, Y . Liu, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correc- tion in superconducting circuits,” Nature536, 441...
2016 arXiv
-
[134]
Nobel Lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary,
S. Haroche, “Nobel Lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary,” Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1083 (2013)
2013
-
[135]
Quantum information processing with supercon- ducting qubits in a microwave field,
J. Q. You and F. Nori, “Quantum information processing with supercon- ducting qubits in a microwave field,” Phys. Rev. B 68, 064509 (2003), arXiv:0306207 [cond-mat]
2003
-
[136]
Comparison of quantum and semiclassi- cal radiation theories with application to the beam maser,
E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, “Comparison of quantum and semiclassi- cal radiation theories with application to the beam maser,” Proc. IEEE51, 89 (1963)
1963
-
[137]
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics,
A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Ku- mar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics,” Nature 431, 162 (2004), arXiv:0407325 [cond-mat]
2004
-
[138]
Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator,
M. Hofheinz, H. Wang, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, “Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator,” Na- ture 459, 546 (2009)
2009
-
[139]
Arbitrary Control of a Quantum Electromagnetic Field,
C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, “Arbitrary Control of a Quantum Electromagnetic Field,” Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1055 (1996)
1996
-
[140]
Generation of nonclassical photon states using a superconducting qubit in a microcavity,
Y .-X. Liu, L. F. Wei, and F. Nori, “Generation of nonclassical photon states using a superconducting qubit in a microcavity,” Europhys. Lett. 67, 941 (2004), arXiv:0402189 [quant-ph]
2004
-
[141]
Resonance Fluorescence of a Single Artificial Atom,
O. Astafiev, A. M. Zagoskin, A. A. Abdumalikov, Y . A. Pashkin, T. Ya- mamoto, K. Inomata, Y . Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, “Resonance Fluorescence of a Single Artificial Atom,” Science 327, 840 (2010), arXiv:1002.4944. 40 Anton Frisk Kockum and Franco Nori
2010 arXiv
-
[142]
Power Spectrum of Light Scattered by Two-Level Systems,
B. R. Mollow, “Power Spectrum of Light Scattered by Two-Level Systems,” Phys. Rev. 188, 1969 (1969)
1969
-
[143]
Demonstration of a Single-Photon Router in the Microwave Regime,
I.-C. Hoi, C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, T. Palomaki, B. Peropadre, and P. Delsing, “Demonstration of a Single-Photon Router in the Microwave Regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 073601 (2011), arXiv:1103.1782
2011 arXiv
-
[144]
Gi- ant Cross-Kerr Effect for Propagating Microwaves Induced by an Artificial Atom,
I.-C. Hoi, A. F. Kockum, T. Palomaki, T. M. Stace, B. Fan, L. Tornberg, S. R. Sathyamoorthy, G. Johansson, P. Delsing, and C. M. Wilson, “Gi- ant Cross-Kerr Effect for Propagating Microwaves Induced by an Artificial Atom,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 053601 (2013), arXiv:1207.1203
2013 arXiv
-
[145]
Circuit-QED: How strong can the coupling between a Josephson junction atom and a transmission line resonator be?
M. H. Devoret, S. Girvin, and R. Schoelkopf, “Circuit-QED: How strong can the coupling between a Josephson junction atom and a transmission line resonator be?” Ann. Phys. 16, 767 (2007)
2007
-
[146]
Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime,
T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. H¨ummer, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, “Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime,” Nat. Phys. 6, 772 (2010), arXiv:1003.2376
2010 arXiv
-
[147]
Superconducting qubit-oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime,
F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, “Superconducting qubit-oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime,” Nat. Phys. 13, 44 (2017), arXiv:1602.00415
2017 arXiv
-
[148]
Integrability of the Rabi Model,
D. Braak, “Integrability of the Rabi Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 100401 (2011), arXiv:1103.2461
2011 arXiv
-
[149]
Multiphoton quantum Rabi oscillations in ultrastrong cavity QED,
L. Garziano, R. Stassi, V . Macr `ı, A. F. Kockum, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, “Multiphoton quantum Rabi oscillations in ultrastrong cavity QED,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 063830 (2015), arXiv:1509.06102
2015 arXiv
-
[150]
Determin- istic quantum nonlinear optics with single atoms and virtual photons,
A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, V . Macr`ı, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, “Determin- istic quantum nonlinear optics with single atoms and virtual photons,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 063849 (2017), arXiv:1701.05038
2017 arXiv
-
[151]
Quantum nonlinear optics without photons,
R. Stassi, V . Macr`ı, A. F. Kockum, O. Di Stefano, A. Miranowicz, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, “Quantum nonlinear optics without photons,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 023818 (2017), arXiv:1702.00660
2017 arXiv
-
[152]
Ul- trastrong coupling between light and matter,
A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, “Ul- trastrong coupling between light and matter,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 19 (2019), arXiv:1807.11636
2019 arXiv
-
[153]
Cohen-Tannoudji, B
C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Lalo ¨e, Quantum Mechanics, Volume 1 (Wiley, 1977)
1977
-
[154]
Optical Selec- tion Rules and Phase-Dependent Adiabatic State Control in a Superconduct- ing Quantum Circuit,
Y .-X. Liu, J. Q. You, L. F. Wei, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, “Optical Selec- tion Rules and Phase-Dependent Adiabatic State Control in a Superconduct- ing Quantum Circuit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087001 (2005), arXiv:0501047 [quant-ph]
2005
-
[155]
Two-photon probe of the Jaynes–Cummings model and controlled symme- try breaking in circuit QED,
F. Deppe, M. Mariantoni, E. P. Menzel, A. Marx, S. Saito, K. Kakuyanagi, H. Tanaka, T. Meno, K. Semba, H. Takayanagi, E. Solano, and R. Gross, “Two-photon probe of the Jaynes–Cummings model and controlled symme- try breaking in circuit QED,” Nat. Phys. 4, 686 (2008), arXiv:080...
2008 arXiv
-
[156]
Ultimate On-Chip Quantum Amplifier,
O. V . Astafiev, A. A. Abdumalikov, A. M. Zagoskin, Y . A. Pashkin, Y . Naka- mura, and J. S. Tsai, “Ultimate On-Chip Quantum Amplifier,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 183603 (2010), arXiv:1004.3864
2010 arXiv
-
[157]
Controllable microwave three-wave mixing via a single three-level super- conducting quantum circuit,
Y .-X. Liu, H.-C. Sun, Z. H. Peng, A. Miranowicz, J. S. Tsai, and F. Nori, “Controllable microwave three-wave mixing via a single three-level super- conducting quantum circuit,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7289 (2014), arXiv:1308.6409
2014 arXiv
-
[158]
Full two-photon down-conversion of a single photon,
E. S ´anchez-Burillo, L. Mart ´ın-Moreno, J. J. Garc´ıa-Ripoll, and D. Zueco, “Full two-photon down-conversion of a single photon,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 053814 (2016), arXiv:1602.05603
2016 arXiv
-
[159]
Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom,
M. V . Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekstr¨om, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, “Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom,” Science346, 207 (2014), arXiv:1404.0401
2014 arXiv
-
[160]
Morgan, Surface Acoustic Wave Filters, 2nd ed
D. Morgan, Surface Acoustic Wave Filters, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, 2007)
2007
-
[161]
Designing frequency- dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom,
A. F. Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, “Designing frequency- dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 013837 (2014), arXiv:1406.0350
2014 arXiv
-
[162]
Giant acoustic atom: A single quantum system with a deterministic time delay,
L. Guo, A. L. Grimsmo, A. F. Kockum, M. Pletyukhov, and G. Johansson, “Giant acoustic atom: A single quantum system with a deterministic time delay,” Phys. Rev. A95, 053821 (2017), arXiv:1612.00865
2017 arXiv
-
[163]
Quantum Acous- tics with Surface Acoustic Waves,
T. Aref, P. Delsing, M. K. Ekstr ¨om, A. F. Kockum, M. V . Gustafsson, G. Jo- hansson, P. J. Leek, E. Magnusson, and R. Manenti, “Quantum Acous- tics with Surface Acoustic Waves,” in Superconducting Devices in Quan- tum Optics , edited by R. H. Hadfield and G. Johansson (Spring...
2016 arXiv
-
[164]
Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with sur- face acoustic waves,
R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tan- credi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, “Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with sur- face acoustic waves,” Nat. Commun.8, 975 (2017), arXiv:1703.04495
2017 arXiv
-
[165]
Decoherence-Free Interaction between Giant Atoms in Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics,
A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, “Decoherence-Free Interaction between Giant Atoms in Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 140404 (2018), arXiv:1711.08863
2018 arXiv
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.