Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Vanadium spin qubits as telecom quantum emitters in silicon carbide

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Vanadium defects in silicon carbide emit stable single telecom photons and host a controllable spin.

desk verdict A solid experimental demonstration that single V4+ centers in SiC are telecom-wavelength single emitters with a controllable spin; the known caveats are real but mostly minor. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09817 v1 pith:6ALNDHSH submitted 2019-08-26 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Gary Wolfowicz , Christopher P. Anderson , Berk Diler , Oleg G. Poluektov , F. Joseph Heremans , David D. Awschalom This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords vanadiumdefectssiliconcarbidequantumemittertelecomO-bandsingle-photonsourcespinqubitopticallydetectedmagneticresonanceisotopeshift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish that neutral vanadium impurities (V4+) in silicon carbide are practical telecom-wavelength quantum emitters with usable spin registers. By implanting single vanadium atoms into 4H-SiC, the authors observe stable single-photon emission in the O-band (1278–1388 nm) with g(2)(0)=0.1(1) and a linewidth that remains unchanged over 15 hours. In ensembles, they map the d1 orbital physics across all five inequivalent lattice sites, attribute fine spectral structure to nearest-neighbor silicon and carbon isotopes, and measure spin-Hamiltonian parameters by ODMR, ESR, and pump-probe spectroscopy. They also demonstrate coherent Rabi oscillations of the electron spin in a 6H-SiC site. If correct, this makes V4+ in SiC one of the few solid-state systems that combines telecom-band emission, a nuclear spin register, and a mature CMOS-compatible host material.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is the V4+ substitutional defect in silicon carbide: a single 3d electron bound to a 51V nucleus (I = 7/2) sitting on a silicon site. Crystal-field splitting of the 2D free-ion term creates two orbital ground states (GS1, GS2) and three excited states (ES1–ES3), whose energies depend on the local symmetry (Td-like quasi-cubic vs C3v-like quasi-hexagonal) of each inequivalent lattice site. The paper's main experimental machinery is resonant photoluminescence excitation combined with optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR), electron spin resonance (ESR), and optical pump-probe hole-burning; these yield the parameters of the spin Hamiltonian H = µB B0·g·S − µN gN B0·I + S·A·I. A secondary but essential tool is the isotope-shift model, which uses a multinomial distribution of natural silicon and carbon isotope abundances to fit every resonant spectrum and thereby identify which optical peaks belong to which orbital state and site.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to measure the hyperfine-resolved spectra of single emitters at high magnetic field, where the 52-degree-tilted hyperfine components predicted for GS2 of the quasi-cubic sites could be compared with ab initio calculations for each specific lattice site; a mismatch would show the observed transitions were misassigned. More immediately, a Hanbury Brown-Twiss measurement with two detectors on many implanted spots, combined with observation of discrete nuclear-spin-split lines in the single-emitter spectrum, would confirm or refute the single-defect interpretation that underlies g(2)(0)=0.1(1).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a single neutral vanadium defect in silicon carbide behaves as a bright, stable telecom photon source with an addressable spin. The authors show that a single V4+ emitter in 4H-SiC, created by ion implantation near the surface, emits on the GS1-ES1 transition at 1278.8 nm with a ~750 MHz linewidth that does not drift over 15 hours, and that its photon statistics are antibunched (g(2)(0)=0.1(1)), confirming single-emitter character without any cavity enhancement. For ensembles, they resolve the full set of orbital states in all five inequivalent sites (α, β in 4H-SiC; α, β, γ in 6H-SiC) and reproduce the asymmetric line shapes with a multinomial isotope model assuming natural abundances of 29Si, 30Si, and 13C neighbors, yielding shifts of 2.0(5) GHz/u for silicon and 22(3) GHz/u for carbon. ODMR and ESR provide anisotropic g-tensors and hyperfine tensors for GS1, GS2, and ES1, including clock transitions, and coherent Rabi driving between hyperfine states in the 6H-SiC β site demonstrates spin control.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the provisional site labels (α, β, γ) and the crystal-field model used to group the data actually assign each optical transition to the correct vanadium orbital state and lattice site; the authors explicitly note that the exact site assignments remain in question.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single V4+ centers can be integrated into SiC photonic crystal cavities to enhance emission rate and collection efficiency through the Purcell effect, as the paper suggests.
  • Isotopically purified SiC (28Si, 12C) should narrow ensemble linewidths dramatically, making optically resolved nuclear spin states feasible in single emitters.
  • The measured spin Hamiltonians, including clock transitions, give a benchmark for first-principles defect calculations and a route toward magnetic-field-insensitive quantum memory states.
  • Coherent Rabi control of the 6H-SiC β site establishes that the V4+ spin register can be manipulated by microwaves, supporting future spin-photon entanglement protocols.
  • The five-site characterization across 4H- and 6H-SiC maps the available parameter space of wavelengths (1278–1388 nm) and spin parameters, enabling site-selective device design.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension not in the paper: using the measured isotope shifts to address one particular 13C- or 29Si-containing V center optically could create a directly optically readable nuclear-spin qubit, provided single-defect linewidths can be narrowed below the isotope shift spacing.
  • If the site assignments are later corrected, the hyperfine tensors in Table 1 would need to be re-attributed, but the central conclusion of a telecom emitter with spin control would survive; the assignment ambiguity therefore limits the microscopic model, not the application.
  • The authors report T1 relaxation of ~0.2–1.2 µs at 3.3 K; a testable prediction from the silicon-vacancy analogy they cite is that T1 and T2 should rise by orders of magnitude at mK temperatures, which would make the system viable for memory applications.
  • Because the optical transition is sensitive to local mass, this defect could double as a nanoscale mass or strain sensor for nearby isotopic or mechanical perturbations, though the paper does not explore sensing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a comprehensive experimental study of neutral vanadium (V4+) impurities in 4H- and 6H-SiC as telecom-band quantum emitters. The authors create and isolate near-surface single V centers, measure g(2) autocorrelation for one emitter, demonstrate 15-hour spectral stability, and characterize the optical orbital structure of all five inequivalent V sites via resonant photoluminescence. They model the observed spectral asymmetry and side peaks as isotope shifts from neighboring 29Si, 30Si, and 13C nuclei. Using ODMR, ESR, and optical pump-probe techniques, they extract g-factors and hyperfine parameters for ground and excited orbital states, identify field-insensitive clock transitions, measure spin-lattice-type relaxation times, and demonstrate coherent Rabi oscillations in the 6H-SiC β site. The central claim is that V4+ in SiC is a viable telecom emitter with an optically addressable spin register for quantum communication applications.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a substantial advance: it identifies a telecom O-band emitter in a wafer-scale CMOS-compatible material with a spin register, narrow optical linewidths, and coherent spin control, avoiding the need for frequency conversion or cavity enhancement for basic detection. The paper's strengths include cross-validated spin parameter extraction via independent ODMR and ESR measurements, reproducible single-emitter spectra over 15 hours, and the first demonstration of coherent Rabi oscillations in this system. The isotope-shift model, while phenomenological, provides a concrete route toward optically resolved nuclear spin registers and isotopically purified materials. However, the single-emitter claim rests on a single-detector g(2) measurement that is not conclusive as presented, and the provisional nature of the site assignments limits some site-specific conclusions. These issues are fixable but require additional experimental evidence and clearer framing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Single V centers, Fig. 2B] The g(2)(0)=0.1(1) value is obtained from a single SNSPD with a 20 ns deadtime and 10 ns resolution, and the quoted value is an extrapolation from an exponential fit whose short-delay behavior lies largely inside the deadtime region. A single detector with a deadtime suppresses short-delay coincidences for any source, including classical sources, so the fitted sub-0.5 value does not by itself prove single-photon emission. Because the paper's strongest claim—an isolated single telecom V4+ emitter—depends on this measurement, I request either a two-detector Hanbury Brown-Twiss measurement or an independent verification (e.g., power-dependent second-order correlation or saturation of the dip with excitation power) before publication.
  2. [Discussion and Table 1] The text explicitly states that "The exact site assignments remain in question," yet Table 1 assigns spin parameters to specific lattice sites (h, k1, k2) and the spin-properties section interprets orbital symmetries and hyperfine aspect ratios in terms of those assignments. If the provisional assignments are incorrect, the site-specific g-factors, hyperfine tensors, and the associated physical interpretations in Table 1 would be misattributed, although the existence of a telecom emitter with a spin register would still stand. The manuscript should clearly separate the robust conclusions from the site-dependent assignments, for example by labeling the h/k assignments as tentative in Table 1 and in the main text claims that rely on them.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2B caption and main text] The displayed equation for the g(2) fit is garbled in the text and should be typeset correctly for readability.
  2. [Fig. 1C caption] The caption states that a weak sharp peak at the center of the 6H-SiC γ spectrum "is unknown and is possibly from the laser"; this should be clarified or removed if the origin cannot be determined, since it is left unexplained.
  3. [Results, optical spectroscopy] The text refers to Supplementary Materials S1 and Fig. S2 for the isotope model; the authors should ensure that the supplementary material fully supports the multinomial model, including the assumption of only nearest-neighbor isotope effects.
  4. [Table 1] Several entries such as "0<g<1" and "0" for hyperfine components are not quantitative; reporting fitted values with confidence intervals or explicitly marking them as upper/lower bounds would strengthen the table.
  5. [Spin properties and Discussion] The term "clock transitions" is used for field-insensitive resonances observed in ODMR, but no coherence time (T2) or memory demonstration is reported; the abstract's phrase "clock transitions for quantum memories" overstates what is directly measured and should be tempered or explicitly labeled as inferred.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claims rest on new measurements and externally cited prior work, with all fitted parameters disclosed as fits.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing results are experimental: resonant PL spectra, isotope-shift structure, lifetimes, single-emitter g(2), ODMR/ESR spectra, and Rabi oscillations. The isotope model is explicitly a fit with free lineshape and mass-shift parameters ('with only the intrinsic lineshape of the sub-peaks and frequency shift per change in atomic mass as free parameters, we are fully able to reproduce the spectra'), and the spin parameters are fitted to Eq. 1 and then used to simulate the same data, so no fitted input is relabeled as an independent prediction. The crystal-field level scheme is taken from the external literature (refs. 17, 23) rather than from the authors' prior work, and the authors explicitly concede that the site labels are provisional ('The exact site assignments remain in question'). Self-citations (refs. 29, 40) are contextual or methodological and do not carry any uniqueness or derivation claim. The single-detector g(2) measurement with 20 ns deadtime is a legitimate experimental concern about the strength of the single-emitter evidence, but it is not a circularity: the fitted g(2)(0) is an inference from measured photon statistics, not an input defined by the paper's conclusions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained; no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on three categories of fitted inputs: isotope shift parameters and linewidth from the optical spectra, spin Hamiltonian parameters from ODMR/ESR fits, and Rabi fit parameters. The orbital assignment relies on prior crystal field models. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Isotope shift per atomic mass unit for carbon (C) = 22(3) GHz/u
    Fitted to ensemble resonant spectra using a multinomial isotope model (Fig. 1D, Supplementary S1).
  • Isotope shift per atomic mass unit for silicon (Si) = 2.0(5) GHz/u
    Same isotope model fit.
  • Intrinsic inhomogeneous linewidth of optical sub-peaks = ~2 GHz
    Extracted from the isotope model fit; includes unresolved spin sublevels.
  • Spin Hamiltonian parameters (g-factors, hyperfine components) for each site/orbital state = Table 1 values, e.g., GS1 4H-SiC β: gzz=1.870(5), Axx=103, Ayy=188, Azz=174(5) MHz
    Fitted to ODMR/ESR spectra for each site; absolute values only, signs not resolved.
  • Rabi oscillation fit parameters (Ω_R, Γ, Δω) = determined per power, not tabulated
    Fitted to coherent Rabi driving data in 6H-SiC β site (Fig. 4C).
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The spin Hamiltonian H = μ_B B0·g·S - μ_N g_N B0·I + S·A·I describes the V4+ spin levels.
    Eq. 1 in the 'Spin properties' section; standard effective spin Hamiltonian for an electron-nuclear spin system.
  • domain assumption Crystal field model of the 3d1 configuration in SiC with Td/C3v symmetry gives the orbital level scheme (GS1,2 and ES1,2,3).
    Taken from Refs 17,22,23; used to assign observed optical transitions to orbital states.
  • domain assumption The optical transition shifts are caused by nearest-neighbor isotope mass variations, and the distribution follows a multinomial with natural abundances.
    Isotope model in Fig. 1D and Supplementary S1; necessary to reproduce spectral duplicates.
  • domain assumption V4+ is the neutral charge state of substitutional vanadium on a silicon site and is responsible for the observed ~1.3 µm emission.
    Based on prior ESR/MCD literature (Refs 20,21) and charge state stabilization with 365 nm illumination.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vanadium spin qubits as telecom quantum emitters in silicon carbide." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6ALNDHSH

@misc{pith2026190809817,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vanadium spin qubits as telecom quantum emitters in silicon carbide},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6ALNDHSH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09817}
}
read the original abstract

Solid state quantum emitters with spin registers are promising platforms for quantum communication, yet few emit in the narrow telecom band necessary for low-loss fiber networks. Here we create and isolate near-surface single vanadium dopants in silicon carbide (SiC) with stable and narrow emission in the O-band (1278-1388 nm), with brightness allowing cavity-free detection in a wafer-scale CMOS-compatible material. In vanadium ensembles, we characterize the complex d1 orbital physics in all five available sites in 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC. The optical transitions are sensitive to mass shifts from local silicon and carbon isotopes, enabling optically resolved nuclear spin registers. Optically detected magnetic resonance in the ground and excited orbital states reveals a variety of hyperfine interactions with the vanadium nuclear spin and clock transitions for quantum memories. Finally, we demonstrate coherent quantum control of the spin state. These results provide a path for telecom emitters in the solid-state for quantum applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09817 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Single V4+ α site emitters implanted in 4H-SiC. (A) Spatial (near-surface) PL mapping of single and few V defects by resonant excitation at 1278.8 nm and at 3.3 K. (B) and (C) are obtained at the circled bright spot with spatial feedback to prevent drifting. (B) g (2) autocorrelation measurement obtained with a single detector with 20 ns deadtime and 10 ns resolution. The autocorrelation signal is normalized using i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the V4+ β site in 4H-SiC at 3.4 K. See Fig. S3-6 for all the other sites in 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC. (A) Energy level structure including the electron spin (S) and nuclear spin (I) for the GS1, GS2 and ES1 levels. The static magnetic field (B0) dependence is simulated using fitted spin parameters from (B), (C) and (F). (B) ODMR of the lowest ground state GS1 as a function of B0 and micro… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Lifetimes and coherent properties at 3.3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-Fidelity Control of a Strongly Coupled Electro-Nuclear Spin-Photon Interface

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A zero-field protocol for 117SnV- color centers keeps the nuclear memory qubit insensitive to optical excitation, demonstrated with high-fidelity microwave control in a photonic integrated circuit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. Yin, Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, B. Li, H. Dai, G.- B. Li, Q.-M. Lu, Y.-H. Gong, Y. Xu, S.-L. Li, F.-Z. Li, Y.-Y. Yin, Z.-Q. Jiang, M. Li, J.-J. Jia, G. Ren, D. He, Y.-L. Zhou, X.-X. Zhang, N. Wang, X. Chang, Z.-C. Zhu, N.-L. Liu, Y.-A. Chen, C.- Y. Lu, R. Shu, C.-Z. Peng, J.-Y. Wang, J.-W. Pan, Satellite-ba...

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    P. C. Humphreys, N. Kalb, J. P. J. Morits, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, D. J. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Hanson, Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network. Nature. 558, 268–273 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Dréau, A

    A. Dréau, A. Tcheborateva, A. El Mahdaoui, C. Bonato, R. Hanson, Quantum Frequency Conversion of Single Photons from a Nitrogen-Vacancy Center in Diamond to Telecommunication Wavelengths. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 1–8 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Zhong, J

    T. Zhong, J. M. Kindem, J. G. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, I. Craiciu, E. Miyazono, M. Bettinelli, E. Cavalli, V. Verma, S. W. Nam, F. Marsili, M. D. Shaw, A. D. Beyer, A. Faraon, Nanophotonic rare-earth quantum memory with optically controlled retrieval. Science (80-. ). 357, 1392–1395 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Calusine, A

    G. Calusine, A. Politi, D. D. Awschalom, Silicon carbide photonic crystal cavities with integrated color centers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 011123 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    B. C. Rose, D. Huang, Z.-H. Zhang, P. Stevenson, A. M. Tyryshkin, S. Sangtawesin, S. Srinivasan, L. Loudin, M. L. Markham, A. M. Edmonds, D. J. Twitchen, S. A. Lyon, N. P. de Leon, Observation of an environmentally insensitive solid-state spin defect in diamond. Science (80-. ). 361, 60–63 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    A. L. Falk, B. B. Buckley, G. Calusine, W. F. Koehl, V. V. Dobrovitski, A. Politi, C. A. Zorman, P. X.-L. Feng, D. D. Awschalom, Polytype control of spin qubits in silicon carbide. Nat. Commun. 4, 1819 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Iwasaki, Y

    T. Iwasaki, Y. Miyamoto, T. Taniguchi, P. Siyushev, M. H. Metsch, F. Jelezko, M. Hatano, Tin- Vacancy Quantum Emitters in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 253601 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    D. D. Awschalom, R. Hanson, J. Wrachtrup, B. B. Zhou, Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins. Nat. Photonics. 12, 516–527 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Thiering, A

    G. Thiering, A. Gali, Ab Initio Magneto-Optical Spectrum of Group-IV Vacancy Color Centers in Diamond. Phys. Rev. X. 8, 021063 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    C. Yin, M. Rancic, G. G. de Boo, N. Stavrias, J. C. McCallum, M. J. Sellars, S. Rogge, Optical addressing of an individual erbium ion in silicon. Nature. 497, 91–94 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    K. F. Wall, A. Sanchez, Titanium Sapphire Lasers. Lincoln Lab. J. 3, 447–462 (1990)

    1990

  5. [13]

    Sorokin, S

    E. Sorokin, S. Naumov, I. T. Sorokina, Ultrabroadband infrared solid-state lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 11, 690–712 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    W. F. Koehl, B. B. Buckley, F. J. Heremans, G. Calusine, D. D. Awschalom, Room temperature coherent control of defect spin qubits in silicon carbide. Nature. 479, 84–87 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Bosma, G

    T. Bosma, G. J. J. Lof, C. M. Gilardoni, O. V. Zwier, F. Hendriks, B. Magnusson, A. Ellison, A. Gällström, I. G. Ivanov, N. T. Son, R. W. A. Havenith, C. H. van der Wal, Identification and tunable optical coherent control of transition-metal spins in silicon carbide. npj Quant...

    2018

  8. [16]

    Spindlberger, A

    L. Spindlberger, A. Csóré, G. Thiering, S. Putz, R. Karhu, J. U. Hassan, N. T. Son, T. Fromherz, A. Gali, M. Trupke, Optical Properties of Vanadium in 4 H Silicon Carbide for Quantum Technology. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 014015 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Kunzer, H

    M. Kunzer, H. D. Müller, U. Kaufmann, Magnetic circular dichroism and site-selective optically detected magnetic resonance of the deep amphoteric vanadium impurity in 6 H -SiC. Phys. Rev. B. 48, 10846–10854 (1993)

    1993

  10. [18]

    Reinke, H

    J. Reinke, H. Weihrich, S. Greulich-Weber, J.-M. Spaeth, Magnetic circular dichroism of a vanadium impurity in 6H-silicon carbide. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 8, 1862–1867 (1993)

    1993

  11. [19]

    Wolfowicz, A

    G. Wolfowicz, A. M. Tyryshkin, R. E. George, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, M. L. W. Thewalt, S. A. Lyon, J. J. L. Morton, Atomic clock transitions in silicon-based spin qubits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 881–881 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Kunzer, U

    M. Kunzer, U. Kaufmann, K. Maier, J. Schneider, Magnetic circular dichroism and electron spin resonance of the A− acceptor state of vanadium, V3+, in 6H-SiC. Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 29, 118–121 (1995)

    1995

  13. [21]

    K. F. Dombrowski, U. Kaufmann, M. Kunzer, K. Maier, J. Schneider, V. B. Shields, M. G. Spencer, Deep donor state of vanadium in cubic silicon carbide (3C‐SiC). Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1811–1813 (1994)

    1994

  14. [22]

    Scherz, Cubic fields with tetragonal and trigonal distortions in crystal field theory of transition metal ions

    U. Scherz, Cubic fields with tetragonal and trigonal distortions in crystal field theory of transition metal ions. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 30, 2077–2089 (1969)

    1969

  15. [23]

    Kaufmann, A

    B. Kaufmann, A. Dörnen, F. S. Ham, Crystal-field model of vanadium in 6H silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. B. 55, 13009–13019 (1997)

    1997

  16. [24]

    J. Baur, M. Kunzer, J. Schneider, Transition Metals in SiC Polytypes, as Studied by Magnetic Resonance Techniques. Phys. status solidi. 162, 153–172 (1997)

    1997

  17. [25]

    Cardona, M

    M. Cardona, M. L. W. Thewalt, Isotope effects on the optical spectra of semiconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1173–1224 (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    M. L. W. Thewalt, M. Steger, A. Yang, N. Stavrias, M. Cardona, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, M. F. Churbanov, A. V. Gusev, A. D. Bulanov, I. D. Kovalev, A. K. Kaliteevskii, O. N. Godisov, P. Becker, H. J. Pohl, J. W. Ager, E. E. Haller, Can highly enriched 28Si reveal new thing...

    2007

  19. [27]

    D. J. Christle, P. V. Klimov, C. F. de las Casas, K. Szász, V. Ivády, V. Jokubavicius, J. Ul Hassan, M. Syväjärvi, W. F. Koehl, T. Ohshima, N. T. Son, E. Janzén, Á. Gali, D. D. Awschalom, Isolated Spin Qubits in SiC with a High-Fidelity Infrared Spin-to-Photon Interface. Phys....

    2017

  20. [28]

    V. M. Acosta, A. Jarmola, E. Bauch, D. Budker, Optical properties of the nitrogen-vacancy singlet levels in diamond. Phys. Rev. B. 82, 201202 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    C. P. Anderson, A. Bourassa, K. C. Miao, G. Wolfowicz, P. J. Mintun, A. L. Crook, H. Abe, J. U. Hassan, N. T. Son, T. Ohshima, D. D. Awschalom, Electrical and optical control of single spins integrated in scalable semiconductor devices. arXiv:1906.08328 (2019) (available at ht...

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Wolters, N

    J. Wolters, N. Sadzak, A. W. Schell, T. Schröder, O. Benson, Measurement of the Ultrafast Spectral Diffusion of the Optical Transition of Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Nano-Size Diamond Using Correlation Interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 027401 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    Lohrmann, B

    A. Lohrmann, B. C. Johnson, J. C. McCallum, S. Castelletto, A review on single photon sources in silicon carbide. Reports Prog. Phys. 80, 034502 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    M. Ruf, M. IJspeert, S. van Dam, N. de Jong, H. van den Berg, G. Evers, R. Hanson, Optically Coherent Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Micrometer-Thin Etched Diamond Membranes. Nano Lett. 19, 3987–3992 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Maier, J

    K. Maier, J. Schneider, W. Wilkening, S. Leibenzeder, R. Stein, Electron spin resonance studies of transition metal deep level impurities in SiC. Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 11, 27–30 (1992)

    1992

  26. [34]

    R. S. Drago, Physical Methods for Chemists (Saunders College Pub., 1992)

    1992

  27. [35]

    Zhong, M

    M. Zhong, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, J. G. Bartholomew, S. E. Beavan, S. M. Wittig, J. J. Longdell, M. J. Sellars, Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time. Nature. 517, 177–180 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    K. D. Jahnke, A. Sipahigil, J. M. Binder, M. W. Doherty, M. Metsch, L. J. Rogers, N. B. Manson, M. D. Lukin, F. Jelezko, Electron–phonon processes of the silicon-vacancy centre in diamond. New J. Phys. 17, 043011 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Budker, D

    D. . Budker, D. Kimball, D. P. DeMille, Atomic Physics : an exploration through problems and solutions (Oxford University Press, 2004)

    2004

  30. [38]

    Rančić, M

    M. Rančić, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, M. J. Sellars, Coherence time of over a second in a telecom-compatible quantum memory storage material. Nat. Phys. 14, 50–54 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    J. F. Clare, S. D. Devine, Measurement of the spin-strain coupling tensor in ruby by ultrasonically- modulated EPR. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 13, 865–878 (1980)

    1980

  32. [40]

    Wolfowicz, C

    G. Wolfowicz, C. P. Anderson, A. L. Yeats, S. J. Whiteley, J. Niklas, O. G. Poluektov, F. J. Heremans, D. D. Awschalom, Optical charge state control of spin defects in 4H-SiC. Nat. Commun. 8, 1876 (2017). Acknowledgments General: We thank A. Bourassa, S. J. Whiteley and J. Nik...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.