Black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a background of modified Chaplygin gas

Bo Chen; Li-Li Xing; Xiang-Qian Li

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a background of modified Chaplygin gas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives an exact static black hole solution in five-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a modified Chaplygin gas background, and shows it obeys the first law and exhibits a phase transition.

desk verdict A legitimate exact-solution paper whose thermodynamic checks hold, but whose 'modified Chaplygin gas' label really means an anisotropic angle-averaged fluid, and whose submission abstract overpromises. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09827 v2 pith:VP2PILZG submitted 2019-08-23 gr-qc

Xiang-Qian Li , Bo Chen , Li-Li Xing This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1583D05 PACS 04.70.Dy04.50.Kd

keywords Einstein-Gauss-BonnetgravitymodifiedChaplygingasblackholethermodynamicsphasetransitionHawkingradiationscalarperturbationshigher-dimensionalexactsolutions

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the five-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet equations, sourced by a modified Chaplygin gas with equation of state $p=A\rho - B/\rho^\beta$, admit an exact static spherically symmetric black hole solution. The metric function $f_\pm(r)$ is given in closed form, with a hypergeometric factor carrying the radial dependence of the gas, and its negative branch reduces to the known 5D general-relativity solution when the Gauss-Bonnet coupling vanishes. The authors show that this solution satisfies the first law $dM = T\,dS$ using Noether-charge entropy, and that its heat capacity diverges at a critical horizon radius, signalling a small/large black hole phase transition in the asymptotically anti-de Sitter case. In the asymptotically de Sitter case they find no $P$-$r_h$ criticality and entangled horizon thermodynamics. They also derive the Hawking temperature from scalar tunneling and find the spacetime stable under scalar perturbations. If correct, the work provides a concrete setting where a unified dark-fluid constituent surrounds a higher-dimensional black hole and modifies its thermodynamics and evaporation remnant.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the stress-tensor ansatz for surrounding matter: the energy-momentum tensor has $T^t{}_t=T^r{}_r=-\rho(r)$, and the angular pressures are obtained by taking an isotropic angle average of the modified Chaplygin gas equation of state, which converts the fluid relation $p=A\rho-B/\rho^\beta$ into a specific anisotropic stress tensor with angular components $\frac{1+4A}{3}\rho-\frac{4B}{3\rho^\beta}$. Substituting this source into the EGB equations reduces the problem to two ordinary differential equations for $f(r)$ and $\rho(r)$. The resulting metric function contains a hypergeometric function $H={}_2F_1$ that encodes the radial dependence of the gas, and a square root whose vanishing defines the branch singularity that constrains the allowed horizon radii.

What would settle it

Substitute an isotropic perfect fluid with $p=A\rho-B/\rho^\beta$ into the EGB field equations with the same metric ansatz; the equations are inconsistent unless the angle-average factor is accepted as part of the definition of the matter. Directly, the ansatz gives $T^r{}_r=-\rho$ while the MCG equation of state prescribes $p=A\rho-B/\rho^\beta$, so a reader who insists on a perfect-fluid interpretation can check this mismatch at any radius and see the solution fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is an exact static, spherically symmetric solution of the five-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet equations in which the source is a modified Chaplygin gas $p=A\rho-B/\rho^\beta$. With the surrounding-matter ansatz $T^t{}_t=T^r{}_r=-\rho(r)$ and angular pressures obtained by isotropic angle average of the equation of state, the energy density becomes $\rho(r)=\left(\frac{1}{1+A}\left[B+\left(\frac{S}{r^4}\right)^{(1+A)(1+\beta)}\right]\right)^{1/(1+\beta)}$, and the metric function takes the two-branch form $f_\pm(r)=1+\frac{r^2}{4\alpha}\left(1\pm\sqrt{1+\frac{16\alpha m}{r^4}+\frac{4\alpha}{3}\left(\frac{B}{1+A}\right)^{1/(1+\beta)}H}\right)$ with a hypergeometric factor $H$. Far from the hole the negative branch is asymptotically de Sitter and the positive branch asymptotically anti-de Sitter. The paper shows the negative-branch solution satisfies $dM=T\,dS$ with a Noether-charge entropy $S=\frac{\Sigma_3 r_h^3}{4G_5}(1+\frac{12\alpha}{r_h^2})$, and that the heat capacity diverges at a critical horizon radius in the AdS case, while the de Sitter case shows no $P$-$r_h$ criticality and has entangled horizon thermodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on treating the modified Chaplygin gas as an anisotropic fluid whose radial pressure is $-\rho$ rather than the isotropic perfect fluid defined by $p=A\rho-B/\rho^\beta$; if the gas must be a perfect fluid, the solution does not represent a black hole surrounded by modified Chaplygin gas.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In the asymptotically anti-de Sitter branch the heat capacity changes sign at a critical horizon radius $r_c$, so smaller black holes are thermodynamically stable and larger ones unstable; the critical pressure, volume, and temperature shift with the Gauss-Bonnet coupling and with the modified Chaplygin gas parameters $A$, $B$, $\beta$, and $S$.
In the asymptotically de Sitter branch there is no $P$-$r_h$ criticality, and the thermodynamic quantities belonging to the inner, event, and cosmological horizons are entangled rather than independent.
The Hawking temperature vanishes at two extremal horizon radii, and the scalar-tunneling probability indicates that radiation stops there, so evaporation can end in an extremal black-hole remnant.
The scalar-field effective potential is positive for both extremal and non-extremal configurations, indicating stability under scalar perturbations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the modified Chaplygin gas is required to be a perfect fluid with isotropic pressure $p=A\rho-B/\rho^\beta$, the anisotropic stress tensor used here would not represent it, so a different construction would be needed to describe a black hole genuinely surrounded by a modified Chaplygin gas perfect fluid.
The closed hypergeometric form of the solution should connect continuously to known limits (vanishing $B$, vanishing $S$, or vanishing $\alpha$); checking those limits explicitly would be a quick consistency test of the derivation.
A natural next step would be to study gravitational (metric) perturbations in this background, since positivity of the scalar effective potential alone does not guarantee stability against tensor or vector perturbations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: the new 5D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet solution with density (2.15) and metric (2.16) is a genuine exact solution, and the thermodynamic consistency checks are real. The soft spot is interpretive: the source is not a standard perfect-fluid modified Chaplygin gas, and the metadata abstract promises things the body doesn't deliver.

What's new: this generalizes the Ghosh-Amir-Maharaj quintessence EGB solution and the authors' own Chaplygin-Lovelock work to the MCG equation of state with exponent beta. The method is Kiselev's anisotropic ansatz, so the novelty is incremental, but the result is a new exact solution, not a parameter fit. The first law is checked with Wald entropy, not just assumed; the tunneling calculation reproduces the same temperature; the entropy is independent of the fluid parameters, matching the string-cloud and quintessence EGB cases. The asymptotic AdS/dS split between the two branches is clean. That is real work and it deserves credit.

Where it gets shaky. The energy-momentum tensor constructed in Sec. 2.2 has T_r^r = -rho and tangential pressure (1+4A)rho/3 - 4B/(3 rho^beta). The MCG relation p = A rho - B/rho^beta holds only after an isotropic average over directions, not as the actual radial pressure. A perfect-fluid MCG would have T_r^r = p. So the solution describes a black hole in an anisotropic fluid whose angle-averaged pressure mimics MCG, not in a literal MCG background. The title and abstract overstate it. The same Kiselev construction is common for quintessence, so this is a known modeling choice, but the authors should say it plainly rather than implying the standard fluid. The far-field limit does recover the isotropic MCG, so the mismatch is mild at large r but real at finite r.

Two more soft spots, both minor. The derivation of rho(r) is skipped with "one easily obtains"; a substitution check would help. The stability claim rests on positive effective potentials in Fig. 6 for a couple of parameter choices; that's suggestive, not a general proof. Also, the abstract attached to the submission promises P-V criticality and dS-horizon entanglement, and those sections are not in the body. That mismatch needs fixing before publication.

Who is it for? People working on exact solutions in Lovelock/EGB gravity with dark fluids. It is a solid niche paper, not a breakthrough. I would send it to peer review, with a referee who understands Kiselev-type anisotropic fluids; the fix is wording and transparency, not new physics.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies five-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a static spherically symmetric line element and a matter source modelled on Kiselev's anisotropic energy-momentum tensor. The authors impose T^t_t=T^r_r=-ρ (Eq. (2.8)), use an angle average to enforce the modified Chaplygin gas equation of state p=Aρ−B/ρ^β in the tangential directions (Eqs. (2.9)-(2.13)), and present the resulting energy density ρ(r) and metric functions f±(r) in closed form, with f− expressed through a hypergeometric function (Eqs. (2.15)-(2.17)). They study horizon structure, mass, Hawking temperature, entropy, the Wald-entropy check of the first law, heat capacity, and a phase transition (Section 3), then compute scalar-particle tunneling and the effective potential for scalar waves (Section 4). The paper concludes that the black hole is stable under scalar perturbations and that Hawking evaporation may end in an extremal remnant.

Significance. If the solution and its matter interpretation are accepted, the paper provides a new exact non-vacuum solution in EGB gravity with a nontrivial matter background, together with a consistent set of thermodynamic identities. The first law is checked independently through the Wald entropy, and the surface-gravity temperature agrees with the tunneling calculation, which are genuine strengths. The explicit hypergeometric form and the parametric analysis of horizons are also useful. The significance is moderated by the fact that the stress tensor is anisotropic and satisfies the MCG equation of state only in the isotropic average, so the physical interpretation as a modified Chaplygin gas background requires qualification; the stability and abstract-promise issues also need to be resolved.

major comments (3)

[§2.2, Eqs. (2.7)–(2.13)] The matter source used in the solution is not the standard modified Chaplygin gas. For a perfect fluid with p=Aρ−B/ρ^β one has T^r_r=p, whereas the manuscript imposes T^t_t=T^r_r=−ρ in Eq. (2.8) and fixes the angular pressure by an isotropic average, yielding p_t=(1+4A)ρ/3−4B/(3ρ^β) in Eq. (2.13). The angle-averaged pressure p_avg=(−ρ+3p_t)/4 equals Aρ−B/ρ^β, but the radial pressure does not. Thus Eqs. (2.15)–(2.16) are an exact solution for an anisotropic Kiselev-type fluid whose tangential equation of state is related to MCG only in the average, not for a black hole surrounded by the modified Chaplygin gas in the usual physical sense. The title and abstract claim about a modified Chaplygin gas background should be qualified, or the anisotropic construction should be explicitly presented as the definition of MCG in this five-dimensional setting; at minimum the paper should state p_r=−ρ and discuss its physical status. This is not merely a wording issue, because the radial pressure enters the field equations and the thermodynamics.
[§4.2, Eq. (4.14), Fig. 6] The stability conclusion is stronger than the evidence. The text infers stability from positivity of the effective potential V(r) plotted in Fig. 6 for one parameter set and two values of m. Positivity of V in a plotted interval does not by itself establish mode stability; one needs the asymptotic behavior at the horizon and at infinity, the boundary conditions defining the Schrödinger problem in r*, and a statement of the criterion used, such as positivity of the corresponding one-dimensional operator or absence of exponentially growing modes. As written, the abstract and conclusion claim that the system is stable under scalar perturbations, while Section 4.2 provides only two sample plots. The authors should either supply the missing mode-stability argument for the parameter ranges considered, or weaken the claim to a numerical indication of stability.
[Metadata abstract and §3] The abstract supplied with the arXiv record promises results that do not appear in the manuscript: critical values of pressure, volume, and temperature for asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes, and an analysis of entangled thermodynamic systems for asymptotically de Sitter black holes, including a statement that no P−r_h criticality appears. Section 3 contains only a heat-capacity phase transition at fixed parameters; there is no P−r_h analysis and no discussion of horizon entanglement. This is a mismatch between the advertised content and the actual content. The authors should either add the missing analysis or correct the abstract so that it matches Section 3.

minor comments (4)

[§2.3, Eq. (2.15)] The derivation of the energy density (2.15) is not shown. Since this formula is the basis of the exact solution, a brief outline of the substitution into Eq. (2.14) and of how the hypergeometric function arises in the metric would be helpful.
[§3, Eqs. (3.7), (3.10); §5] The sentence after Eq. (3.7) says the entropy 'obeys the area law', while the concluding section says the entropy does not obey the area law because of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling. The Wald entropy in Eq. (3.10) contains an α-dependent correction, so the statements should be reconciled; the later statement is the correct one.
[Appendix A, Eq. (A.4)] The exponent of (B/(1+A)) in the mass formula (A.4) is written as 1/(1+α); it should be 1/(1+β), consistent with Eq. (A.3) and with the D=5 case.
[Fig. 5] The upper-left panel of Fig. 5 uses β=1.0 while the other panels and the surrounding text use β=0.1; please check whether this is intentional and make the parameter values consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the black hole solution is obtained by direct integration of the EGB field equations with a stated matter ansatz, and the thermodynamic quantities are derived from the solution rather than used as inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that Eqs. (2.15)-(2.16) solve the 5D EGB equations with a modified-Chaplygin-gas-type source. That derivation is self-contained: Section 2.2 specifies the energy-momentum tensor components (T_tt = T_rr = -rho and angle-averaged angular pressure matching the MCG equation of state), and Section 2.3 integrates the resulting ODEs (2.14) to obtain rho(r) and f(r). The integration constant S is a free parameter, not fitted to any target quantity or renamed as a prediction. The thermodynamic section computes mass from the horizon condition, temperature from surface gravity, and entropy both by integrating dM/T and independently by the Wald Noether-charge formula; the agreement in Eq. (3.13) is an independent consistency check, not a circular input. Similarly, the tunneling calculation in Section 4.1 reproduces the same Hawking temperature from the same metric, which is a check rather than a fitted result. The only self-citation, Ref. [45], appears in the introduction as background context and is not load-bearing for any derivation. The notable caveat is physical rather than circular: the constructed stress tensor has radial pressure -rho, so the fluid is anisotropic and only the angle-averaged pressure obeys p = A rho - B/rho^beta. That concern affects whether the solution describes a standard perfect-fluid modified Chaplygin gas, but it does not make the derivation circular. No fitted input is relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in through self-citation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a model-building exercise: it takes a known gravity theory, a known fluid model, and a known stress-tensor ansatz, and solves for the resulting geometry. All parameters are arbitrary model inputs, not fitted to data. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)

Gauss-Bonnet coupling α
Coupling constant of the EGB action, assumed non-negative; it sets the strength of higher-curvature corrections and affects horizon radii and critical radius.
mass parameter m
Integration constant related to ADM mass M = 3Σ_3 m; it is not fixed by the theory.
MCG parameter A
Coefficient in the equation of state p = Aρ - B/ρ^β, chosen positive.
MCG parameter B
Coefficient in the equation of state, chosen positive.
MCG exponent β
Exponent in the equation of state, assumed in [0,1].
MCG integration constant S
Positive integration constant in the density solution, sets the density profile near the black hole.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet action is the correct theory of gravity
The paper assumes Lovelock/string-theory motivated EGB as the gravitational framework.
domain assumption Modified Chaplygin gas equation of state p = Aρ - B/ρ^β with A,B>0 and 0≤β≤1
Postulated as the background matter model.
domain assumption Kiselev energy-momentum tensor ansatz with T_tt = T_rr = -ρ and angular pressure from isotropic averaging
The solution depends on this stress-tensor form; it is taken from Ref. [24] and applied to 5D.
domain assumption Static spherically symmetric metric ansatz with κ=1
Restricts the spacetime geometry.
domain assumption The negative branch f-(r) is the physical black hole solution
In the α→0 limit it reduces to the GR branch; the f+ branch is not considered as a black hole.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a background of modified Chaplygin gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VP2PILZG

@misc{pith2026190809827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a background of modified Chaplygin gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VP2PILZG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09827}
}

abstract

Supposing the existence of modified Chaplygin gas with the equation of state $p=A\rho-B/\rho^\beta$ as a cosmic background, we obtain a static spherically-symmetric solution to the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravitational equations in 5D spacetime. The spacetime structure of the obtained black hole solution could be asymptotically anti-de Sitter or de Sitter, according to the specific values of modified Chaplygin gas parameters versus the cosmological constant. We analyze the parametric regions for both kinds of solutions. For asymptotically anti-de Sitter black hole, there exists the so-called small/large black hole phase transition, we obtain critical values of pressure, volume, and temperature and investigate the effects of both the Gauss-Bonnet gravity and the modified Chaplygin gas on these values. For asymptotically de Sitter black hole, no $P-r_h$ criticality and phase transition appear, and we show that the thermodynamic systems related to various horizons of asymptotically de Sitter black hole are in fact entangled.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[1]

Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J

D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 498; The Four-Dimensionality of Space and the Einstein Tensor , J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 874

work page 1971
[2]

Zwiebach, Curvature squared terms and string theories , Phys

B. Zwiebach, Curvature squared terms and string theories , Phys. Lett. B 156 (1985) 315

work page 1985
[3]

D. J. Gross, E. Witten, Superstring Modiﬁcations of Einstein’s Equations , Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 1

work page 1986
[4]

R. R. Metsaev, A. A. Tseytlin, Two-loopβ-function for the generalized bosonic sigma model , Phys. Lett. B 191 (1987) 354; Curvature cubed terms in string theory eﬀective actions , Phys. Lett. B 185 (1987) 52

work page 1987
[5]

K. S. Stelle, Classical gravity with higher derivatives , Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 9 (1978) 353

work page 1978
[6]

J. W. Maluf, Conformal invariance and torsion in general relativity , Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 19 (1987) 57

work page 1987
[7]

On Higher Order Gravities, Their Analogy to GR, and Dimensional Dependent Version of Duff's Trace Anomaly Relation

M. Farhoudi, On higher order gravities, their analogy to GR, and dimensional dependent version of Duﬀ’s trace anomaly relation , Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (2006) 1261 [ physics/0509210]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[8]

D. G. Boulware, S. Deser, String-Generated Gravity Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2656

work page 1985

Show all 57 references

[9]

Zumino, Gravity theories in more than four dimensions , Phys

B. Zumino, Gravity theories in more than four dimensions , Phys. Rept. 137 (1986) 109

1986
[10]

R. C. Myers, Superstring gravity and black holes , Nucl. Phys. B 289 (1987) 701

1987
[11]

C. G. Callan Jr., R. C. Myers, M. J. Perry, Black holes in string theory , Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1989) 673

1989
[12]

Y. M. Cho, I. P. Neupane and P. S. Wesson, No ghost state of Gauss-Bonnet interaction in warped background, Nucl. Phys. B 621 (2002) 388 [ hep-th/0104227]. – 14 –

2002 arXiv
[13]

R. G. Cai, Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 084014 [hep-th/0109133]

2002 arXiv
[14]

J. T. Wheeler, Symmetric Solutions to the Gauss-Bonnet Extended Einstein Equations , Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 737

1986
[15]

Y. M. Cho, I. P. Neupane, Anti-de Sitter Black Holes, Thermal Phase Transition and Holography in Higher Curvature Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 024044 [ hep-th/0202140]

2002 arXiv
[16]

R. G. Cai, Q. Guo, Gauss-bonnet black holes in ds spaces , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 104025 [hep-th/0311020]

2004 arXiv
[17]

Dotti, J

G. Dotti, J. Oliva and R. Troncoso, Exact solutions for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory in ﬁve dimensions: Black holes, wormholes and spacetime horns , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064038 [hep-ph/0706.1830]

2007 arXiv
[18]

D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 131103 [gr-qc/1711.01187]

2018 arXiv
[19]

H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou and E. Berti, Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 131104 [gr-qc/1711.02080]

2018 arXiv
[20]

J. L. Blzquez-Salcedo, D. D. Doneva, J. Kunz and S. S. Yazadjiev, Radial perturbations of the scalarized Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 084011 [gr-qc/1805.05755]

2018 arXiv
[21]

C. F. B. Macedo, J. Sakstein, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, H. O. Silva and T. P. Sotiriou, Self-interactions and Spontaneous Black Hole Scalarization , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 104041 [gr-qc/1903.06784]

2019 arXiv
[22]

D. D. Doneva, K. V. Staykov and S. S. Yazadjiev, Gauss-Bonnet black holes with a massive scalar ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 104045 [ gr-qc/1903.08119]

2019 arXiv
[23]

Aghanim et al

N. Aghanim et al. [Planck Collaboration], Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , [astro-ph/1807.06209]

2018 arXiv
[24]

V. V. Kiselev, Quintessence and black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 1187 [gr-qc/0210040]

2003 arXiv
[25]

C. R. Ma, Y. X. Gui and F. J. Wang, Quintessence contribution to a Schwarzschild black hole entropy, Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 3286

2007
[26]

Fernando, Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence: Null geodesics , Gen

S. Fernando, Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence: Null geodesics , Gen. Rel. Grav. 44 (2012) 1857 [ gr-qc/1202.1502]

2012 arXiv
[27]

Z. Feng, L. Zhang and X. Zu, The remnants in Reissner-Nordstr ¨om-de Sitter quintessence black hole, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29 (2014) 1450123

2014
[28]

Malakolkalami and K

B. Malakolkalami and K. Ghaderi, Schwarzschild-anti de Sitter black hole with quintessence , Astrophys. Space Sci. 357 (2015) 112

2015
[29]

Hussain and S

I. Hussain and S. Ali, Eﬀect of quintessence on the energy of the Reissner-Nordstr ¨om black hole, Gen. Rel. Grav. 47 (2015) 34 [ gr-qc/1408.3111]

2015 arXiv
[30]

S. G. Ghosh, M. Amir and S. D. Maharaj, Quintessence background for 5D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 530 [ gr-qc/1611.02936]

2017 arXiv
[31]

S. G. Ghosh, S. D. Maharaj, D. Baboolal and T. H. Lee, Lovelock black holes surrounded by quintessence, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 90 [ gr-qc/1708.03884]

2018 arXiv
[32]

de M.Toledo and V

J. de M.Toledo and V. B. Bezerra, Black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence in Lovelock gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 534. – 15 –

2018
[33]

A. E. Dominguez and E. Gallo, Radiating black hole solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 064018 [ gr-qc/0512150]

2006 arXiv
[34]

Wiltshire, Black holes in string-generated gravity models , Phys

D. Wiltshire, Black holes in string-generated gravity models , Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2445

1988
[35]

Maeda, M

H. Maeda, M. Hassaine and C. Martinez, Lovelock black holes with a nonlinear Maxwell ﬁeld , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 044012 [ gr-qc/0812.2038]

2009 arXiv
[36]

S. H. Hendi, S. Panahiyan and E. Mahmoudi, Thermodynamic analysis of topological black holes in Gauss-Bonnet gravity with nonlinear source , Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3079 [gr-qc/1406.2357]

2014 arXiv
[37]

Habib Mazharimousavi and M

S. Habib Mazharimousavi and M. Halilsoy, 5D black hole solution in Einstein-Yang-Mills-Gauss-Bonnet theory, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 087501 [ gr-qc/0801.1562]

2007 arXiv
[38]

Herscovich and M

E. Herscovich and M. G. Richarte, Black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a string cloud background, Phys. Lett. B 689 (2010) 192 [ hep-th/1004.3754]

2010 arXiv
[39]

A. Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier, An Alternative to quintessence , Phys. Lett. B 511 (2001) 265 [ gr-qc/0103004]

2001 arXiv
[40]

Bilic, G

N. Bilic, G. B. Tupper and R. D. Viollier, Uniﬁcation of dark matter and dark energy: The Inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas, Phys. Lett. B 535 (2002) 17 [ astro-ph/0111325]

2002 arXiv
[41]

M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A. A. Sen, Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion and dark energy-matter uniﬁcation , Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 043507 [ gr-qc/0202064]

2002 arXiv
[42]

Carturan and F

D. Carturan and F. Finelli, Cosmological eﬀects of a class of ﬂuid dark energy models , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 103501 [ astro-ph/0211626]

2003 arXiv
[43]

Amendola, F

L. Amendola, F. Finelli, C. Burigana and D. Carturan, WMAP and the generalized Chaplygin gas, JCAP 0307 (2003) 005 [ astro-ph/0304325]

2003 arXiv
[44]

Bean and O

R. Bean and O. Dore, Are Chaplygin gases serious contenders to the dark energy throne? , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 023515 [ astro-ph/0301308]

2003 arXiv
[45]

X. Q. Li, B. Chen and L. l. Xing, Charged Lovelock black holes in the presence of dark ﬂuid with a nonlinear equation of state , [gr-qc/1905.08156]

1905 arXiv
[46]

H. B. Benaoum, Accelerated universe from modiﬁed Chaplygin gas and tachyonic ﬂuid , [hep-th/0205140]

arXiv
[47]

Debnath, A

U. Debnath, A. Banerjee and S. Chakraborty, Role of modiﬁed Chaplygin gas in accelerated universe, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 5609 [ gr-qc/0411015]

2004 arXiv
[48]

Torii and H

T. Torii and H. Maeda, Spacetime structure of static solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Neutral case, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 124002 [ hep-th/0504127]

2005 arXiv
[49]

Torii and H

T. Torii and H. Maeda, Spacetime structure of static solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Charged case, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 064007 [ hep-th/0504141]

2005 arXiv
[50]

R. M. Wald, Black hole entropy is the Noether charge , Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) R3427

1993
[51]

Sahabandu, P

C. Sahabandu, P. Suranyi, C. Vaz and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Thermodynamics of static black objects in D dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with D-4 compact dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 044009 [ gr-qc/0509102]

2006 arXiv
[52]

Angheben, M

M. Angheben, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo and S. Zerbini, Hawking radiation as tunneling for extremal and rotating black holes , JHEP 0505 (2005) 014 [ hep-th/0503081]

2005 arXiv
[53]

Kerner and R

R. Kerner and R. B. Mann, Tunnelling, temperature and Taub-NUT black holes , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104010 [ gr-qc/0603019]

2006 arXiv
[54]

B. Iyer, S. Iyer, C. Vishveshwara, Scalar waves in the Boulware-Deser black-hole background , Class. Quantum Grav. 6 (1989) 1627. – 16 –

1989
[55]

C. M. Harris and P. Kanti, Hawking radiation from a (4+n)-dimensional black hole: Exact results for the Schwarzschild phase , JHEP 0310 (2003) 014 [ hep-ph/0309054]

2003 arXiv
[56]

Cardoso, M

V. Cardoso, M. Cavaglia and L. Gualtieri, Hawking emission of gravitons in higher dimensions: Non-rotating black holes , JHEP 0602 (2006) 021 [ hep-ph/0512116]

2006 arXiv
[57]

A. S. Cornell, W. Naylor and M. Sasaki, Graviton emission from a higher-dimensional black hole, JHEP 0602 (2006) 012 [ hep-ph/0510009]. – 17 –

2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J

D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 498; The Four-Dimensionality of Space and the Einstein Tensor , J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 874

work page 1971

[2] [2]

Zwiebach, Curvature squared terms and string theories , Phys

B. Zwiebach, Curvature squared terms and string theories , Phys. Lett. B 156 (1985) 315

work page 1985

[3] [3]

D. J. Gross, E. Witten, Superstring Modiﬁcations of Einstein’s Equations , Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 1

work page 1986

[4] [4]

R. R. Metsaev, A. A. Tseytlin, Two-loopβ-function for the generalized bosonic sigma model , Phys. Lett. B 191 (1987) 354; Curvature cubed terms in string theory eﬀective actions , Phys. Lett. B 185 (1987) 52

work page 1987

[5] [5]

K. S. Stelle, Classical gravity with higher derivatives , Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 9 (1978) 353

work page 1978

[6] [6]

J. W. Maluf, Conformal invariance and torsion in general relativity , Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 19 (1987) 57

work page 1987

[7] [7]

On Higher Order Gravities, Their Analogy to GR, and Dimensional Dependent Version of Duff's Trace Anomaly Relation

M. Farhoudi, On higher order gravities, their analogy to GR, and dimensional dependent version of Duﬀ’s trace anomaly relation , Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (2006) 1261 [ physics/0509210]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006

[8] [8]

D. G. Boulware, S. Deser, String-Generated Gravity Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2656

work page 1985