Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 66 references

Quantum dissipative systems beyond the standard harmonic model: features of linear absorption and dynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read When ground and excited potential surfaces curve differently, absorption spectra gain an additional weak substructure—the s-progression—and a closed-form Franck-Condon expression predicts where these extra peaks appear and how they decay.

desk verdict A solid analytic result on Franck-Condon substructure for differing curvatures, wrapped in a numerical paper whose stiff-stilbene part is illustrative rather than quantitative. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10130 v1 pith:L64ST7XE submitted 2019-08-27 physics.chem-ph quant-ph

Luke D. Smith , Arend G. Dijkstra This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords absorptionspectraFranck-CondoncoefficientscurvaturedifferenceMorseoscillatorstochasticSchrödingerequationvibronicprogressionanharmonicitystiff-stilbenephotoswitch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the usual displaced-harmonic-oscillator picture of absorption spectra is incomplete when the ground and excited potential energy surfaces have different curvatures. Using a stochastic Schrödinger equation to include a dissipative environment, the authors show that curvature mismatch produces an additional, decaying substructure—dubbed the s-progression—in the vibronic progression, on top of the familiar main envelope. They derive a closed-form expression for the Franck-Condon coefficients that quantifies this substructure and reduces to the standard Huang-Rhys Poisson distribution when curvatures are equal. The same ideas are applied to a Morse-oscillator model of H2 and to a model potential for the stiff-stilbene photoswitch, where curvature difference, anharmonicity, and dissipation together explain the observed narrowing, shift, and extra peaks in the absorption lineshape.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Franck-Condon coefficient $|\langle \psi_g^{n=0}|\psi_e^n\rangle|^2$ for harmonic oscillators whose ground ($\omega_g$) and excited ($\omega_e$) frequencies differ, generalised from the equal-curvature Poisson expression. The load-bearing identity is the closed-form result of Eq. (39), built from an explicit Hermite-polynomial summation containing the factor $(1-\alpha_e/\alpha)^l$; this factor is zero in the equal-curvature limit (recovering the standard $e^{-D}D^n/n!$ distribution) and is responsible for the s-progression when curvature differs. Mechanistically, the substructure appears because the ground-state wavefunction in the steeper potential is narrow enough to overlap individual oscillations of the excited vibrational wavefunction, so the Franck-Condon amplitude is set by whether the wavefunction at the Franck-Condon centre sits at a node (vanishing overlap) or a local extremum (large overlap). The paper also uses the stochastic Schrödinger equation with Lindblad operators (Eqs. 13–17) to include the environment, comparing harmonic ladder operators $L=a$ with Morse raising and lowering operators whose $L^\dagger L|n\rangle = \Gamma(n-n/\nu)|n\rangle$, and the dipole correlation function $C_{\mu\mu}(t)$, whose Fourier transform is the absorption lineshape, to connect wavepacket dynamics to spectra.

What would settle it

Record a low-temperature, high-resolution absorption spectrum of a molecule with a strongly steeper ground potential than excited potential and a substantial displacement (stiff-stilbene is the paper's candidate); the predicted s-progression should appear as a weak, decaying set of peaks on the short-wavelength side of the main vibronic envelope, with spacings set by the excited-state vibrational frequency and maxima at energies where the excited wavefunction has a local extremum. Observing a smooth Poisson-like envelope with no such substructure, or substructure independent of the curvature ratio, would refute the mechanism; equivalently, recomputing the same spectra with a non-Markovian bath and finding that the substructure vanishes would show that the Markovian Lindblad assumption, not the curvature difference, is doing the work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a molecule with different ground- and excited-state potential curvatures and a sizable displacement, the absorption spectrum no longer follows the smooth Gaussian (Poisson) envelope predicted by identical-curvature displaced oscillators. Instead, the main vibronic progression narrows and shifts to larger vibrational quantum numbers, and a second, decaying series of Franck-Condon peaks appears at higher energies—the s-progression. The paper shows that this substructure arises because the narrow ground-state wavefunction (steeper ground potential) samples only isolated oscillations of the excited-state vibrational wavefunctions, so the overlap alternates between constructive and destructive depending on whether the excited wavefunction has a local extremum or a node at the excitation point. This mechanism is quantified by the derived Franck-Condon expression (Eq. 39), which in the equal-curvature limit recovers the standard Huang-Rhys distribution and in the zero-displacement limit yields the even-n-only progression of the un-displaced differing-curvature model. Applied to an anharmonic Morse oscillator, the paper finds that dissipation broadens the peaks asymmetrically in a way that deviates from harmonic predictions, and that the choice of harmonic versus Morse raising and lowering operators as Lindblad dissipators matters at large displacements; applied to stiff-stilbene, the curvature-mismatch and barrier features explain the narrow, red-shifted absorption band and the s-progression near 350 nm.

Load-bearing premise

The environment is treated as a Markovian (memoryless) bath whose dissipative action is captured by harmonic raising and lowering operators; if realistic condensed-phase systems require a non-Markovian bath or system-specific dissipators, the predicted s-progression, asymmetric broadening, and stiff-stilbene dynamics would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Absorption spectra of molecules with strongly different ground and excited curvatures should show a measurable weak substructure (the s-progression) on the short-wavelength side of the main vibronic envelope; measuring its spacing and decay can estimate the curvature ratio.
  • Fitting spectra with equal-curvature displaced harmonic oscillators overestimates the Huang-Rhys parameter and misassigns peak widths and shifts for molecules like stiff-stilbene.
  • For anharmonic potentials at large displacements, using harmonic Lindblad operators overestimates high-frequency broadening; system-specific Morse operators change the lineshape qualitatively at strong dissipation.
  • In the stiff-stilbene model, damping combined with excited-state barriers traps population in the cis conformation on the excited state and increases the cis yield at 400 fs, suggesting environment tuning can control photoselectivity.
  • The derived Franck-Condon expression generalises the textbook Huang-Rhys formula, reducing to the Poisson distribution when curvatures are equal and to the even-n-only progression when displacement vanishes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The s-progression could serve as a spectroscopic ruler for the curvature ratio independent of absolute displacement, since its onset is set by where the narrow ground wavefunction first overlaps individual excited-state oscillations.
  • A complementary substructure should appear in fluorescence emission spectra, with the roles of ground and excited curvatures swapped, offering an independent check of the mechanism.
  • The substructure's visibility depends on the Markovian dissipator assumption; experiments in solvents with different spectral densities, or non-Markovian simulations, could test how robust the predicted peaks are.
  • Analogous curvature-induced substructures may modulate cross-peak intensities in two-dimensional electronic spectra, providing a nonlinear-spectroscopy test of the same Franck-Condon mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates linear absorption spectra and wavepacket dynamics for molecular vibrations beyond the standard equal-curvature displaced harmonic oscillator model. In Sec. III A the authors study a harmonic model with different ground- and excited-state curvatures, derive an analytic Franck-Condon expression (Eq. (39) with the derivation in Appendix B), and identify an additional 's-progression' caused by the narrow ground-state wavefunction sampling individual oscillations of high-lying excited vibrational wavefunctions. In Sec. III B they use a Morse potential with parameters for H2 and compare harmonic versus Morse raising/lowering operators within a Markovian stochastic Schrödinger equation. In Sec. III C they construct a model stiff-stilbene potential with barriers and curvature difference, and simulate absorption spectra and cis/trans population dynamics. The central analytic derivation is internally consistent and reduces correctly to Eq. (26) in the equal-curvature limit and to Eq. (35) in the zero-displacement limit.

Significance. If correct, Eq. (39) provides a quantitative, closed-form account of curvature-induced vibronic substructure and suggests an experimental route to estimate curvature differences from the width of the s-progression. The paper also gives a useful demonstration that the choice of Lindblad ladder operators can matter for anharmonic systems at large Huang-Rhys factors. Strengths are the complete analytic derivation in Appendix B, the explicit limiting-case checks, and the physical interpretation in Fig. 3. The main caveats are that the stochastic simulation results lack reported statistical uncertainty, the stiff-stilbene parameters are tuned to produce targeted dynamics, and the dissipator model is Markovian with harmonic ladder operators applied to anharmonic systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III B, Sec. III C, Figs. 4-9] The stochastic Schrödinger equation results are presented without any measure of statistical uncertainty. No trajectory count, no error bars, and no convergence test are reported for the absorption spectra in Figs. 4, 5, and 7 or for the population dynamics in Fig. 8. Several conclusions are drawn from small amplitude differences, such as the statements that 'the ZPL has a larger amplitude' and that 'the peaks and troughs of the spectra are increased'; without sampling error the reader cannot distinguish these features from Monte Carlo noise. Please add trajectory counts, standard errors, or stated convergence criteria for all SSE averages.
  2. [Sec. III C, Eq. (45), Fig. 1] The stiff-stilbene calculations are not fully predictive because the central dynamical parameters are chosen to produce the target behavior: omega_e is set to 'ensure the desired period of 400 fs', the moment of inertia I is then computed from Eq. (45) using this choice, and gamma is chosen to 'ensure appropriate broadening in absorption spectra and significant population trapping in the cis-S1 state at 400 fs'. The later interpretation of the 400 fs population dynamics and the cis/trans photoselectivity therefore partly reports the input assumptions. Please separate fitted quantities from predictions, for example by showing how the spectra and dynamics respond to reasonable variations of omega_e, I, and gamma.
  3. [Sec. III C, Sec. II B (Eqs. 13-17)] The stiff-stilbene dissipative dynamics and spectra rest on harmonic lowering operators as Lindblad operators even though the system is anharmonic. The authors correctly flag in Sec. III C that the asymmetric broadening may differ if system-specific operators are used, and for the Morse model they test this in Fig. 7; however, no analogous sensitivity test is presented for stiff-stilbene. Since the broadened spectra and trapping dynamics are central to that section, please add a comparison with an anharmonic (or otherwise different) dissipator, or justify why the harmonic-ladder choice is sufficient for the stiff-stilbene model.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (B17)] The Hermite addition identity in Eq. (B17) is missing the binomial coefficient; the correct coefficient appears later in Eq. (B19), so this appears to be a typo rather than a substantive error.
  2. [Sec. III A, Eq. (35)] Eq. (35) is valid for even n, and the factorial notation (n/2)! makes this implicit; please state the even-n condition explicitly in the main text.
  3. [Sec. III A, Fig. 2] The axes of Fig. 2 are unlabeled; please add axis labels and a clear legend for the standard harmonic model and the differing-curvature model.
  4. [Sec. III B] The Huang-Rhys parameter D is used for the Morse oscillator without an explicit definition of how the displacement is chosen for a given D; please clarify the relation between D and the Morse potential parameters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (39) is an independent closed-form derivation from harmonic-oscillator wavefunctions, and the stiff-stilbene parameters are calibrated model inputs rather than predictions extracted from the same observables.

full rationale

The central claim is the Franck-Condon expression Eq. (39), derived in Appendix B from explicit Gaussian and Hermite-polynomial overlap integrals (Eqs. (B11)-(B22)); the s-progression is read off from that expression and interpreted in Fig. 3, not imposed as an input. The expression reproduces the standard displaced-harmonic result Eq. (26) in the equal-curvature limit and the un-displaced differing-curvature result Eq. (35) when d=0, which are independent internal checks. The differing-curvature model is compared with the earlier independent result of Fidler and Engel and with Chang's general formula, and the paper's derivation is independent of both. The stiff-stilbene parameters omega_e and gamma are chosen to match known timescales and qualitative behavior (Sec. III C), but these are model calibrations, not statistically fitted to the same spectral features that the paper claims to explain; the s-progression and Morse lineshape results do not reduce to those parameter choices. The acknowledged limitation that Markovian harmonic-ladder Lindblad operators may alter asymmetric broadening (Sec. III C) is a modelling caveat, not circularity. Self-citations in the introduction are contextual and not load-bearing. No circular step can be exhibited with a specific equation-to-equation reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The s-progression is a label for a spectral feature, not an invented entity. The main free parameters are the tuned stiff-stilbene PES parameters, the moment of inertia, and the dissipation rate, all chosen to reproduce desired dynamics or schematic/topology features. The axioms are standard open-quantum-system and molecular-spectroscopy assumptions, with the Markovian and harmonic-ladder-operator choices being the most consequential.

free parameters (8)
  • omega_e (excited harmonic fit frequency for stiff-stilbene) = 0.01571 fs^-1
    Chosen in Sec III C to ensure a 400 fs excited-state period and a 200 fs barrierless isomerisation time.
  • gamma (dissipation rate) = 0.2 * omega_e
    Set in Sec III C to ensure appropriate broadening in absorption spectra and significant population trapping in the cis-S1 state at 400 fs.
  • I (moment of inertia) = about 1001 eV fs^2
    Derived in Sec III C from S1(0)=3.5 eV and the chosen omega_e via Eq. (45), so it is tied to the desired period.
  • eta_e (S1 cosine amplitude) = 0.0702
    Sets the three wells and two barriers on the stiff-stilbene excited PES (Appendix A).
  • xi_e (inverted cos-well depth) = 0.375
    Controls the well depth in the region 0 <= theta <= pi on the excited PES (Appendix A).
  • zeta_e (sin(4 theta) barrier asymmetry) = 0.00807
    Raises the cis barrier and lowers the trans barrier on the excited PES (Appendix A).
  • Confining-well coefficients lambda_g, mu_g, lambda_e, mu_e = lambda_g=12(1-1/sqrt(2)), mu_g=10(1-1/sqrt(2)), lambda_e=17(1-1/sqrt(2)), mu_e=15(1-1/sqrt(2))
    Set the steepness and positions of the ground and excited wells in the model PES (Appendix A).
  • Illustrative toy-model parameters in Sec III A = D = 30, omega_g = 10*omega_e, omega_e = 1
    Chosen to make the s-progression visible in Fig. 2; these are transparent model inputs rather than hidden fits.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Condon approximation: the dipole operator has no nuclear-coordinate dependence.
    Used in Sec II C, Eq. (19)-(21), to relate the dephasing function to the absorption lineshape. Standard but not exact for all transitions.
  • domain assumption Markovian quantum white noise and first Markov approximation for the environment.
    Sec II B, Eqs. (9)-(16) assume a rotating-wave approximation and a frequency-independent coupling kappa(omega)=sqrt(gamma/2pi). This makes the bath memoryless.
  • domain assumption Harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions with a common mass and different frequencies describe the vibrational manifolds in the FC derivation.
    Sec III A, Eqs. (27)-(32); the analytic Franck-Condon result is exact only for harmonic potentials.
  • domain assumption System-bath coupling is specified by Lindblad operators chosen as harmonic ladder operators.
    Sec III B/C; the paper itself notes that for anharmonic systems this may overestimate asymmetric broadening.
  • domain assumption The model PES for stiff-stilbene built from TD-DFT data and a schematic diagram reliably captures the key features.
    Sec II A and Appendix A; the surface is constructed from refs 50 and 51, with hand-chosen terms and no error estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum dissipative systems beyond the standard harmonic model: features of linear absorption and dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L64ST7XE

@misc{pith2026190810130,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum dissipative systems beyond the standard harmonic model: features of linear absorption and dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L64ST7XE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10130}
}
abstract

Current simulations of ultraviolet-visible absorption lineshapes, and dynamics of condensed phase systems, largely adopt a harmonic description to model vibrations. Often, this involves a model of displaced harmonic oscillators that have the same curvature. Although convenient, for many realistic molecular systems this approximation no longer suffices. We elucidate non-standard harmonic, and anharmonic effects, on linear absorption and dynamics using a stochastic Schr\"{o}dinger equation approach to account for the environment. Firstly, a harmonic oscillator model with ground and excited potentials that differ in curvature is utilised. Using this model, it is shown that curvature difference gives rise to an additional sub-structure in the vibronic progression of absorption spectra. This effect is explained, and subsequently quantified, via a derived expression for the Franck-Condon coefficients. Subsequently, anharmonic features in dissipative systems are studied, using a Morse potential, and parameters that correspond to the diatomic molecule $H_{2}$ for differing displacements and environment interaction. Lastly using a model potential, the population dynamics and absorption spectra for the stiff-stilbene photoswitch is presented and features are explained by a combination of curvature difference and anharmonicity in the form of potential energy barriers on the excited potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.10130 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Model potential energy surface (PES) of stiff-stilbene in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Franck-Condon coefficients for the standard harmonic model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The nuclear wavefunctions for the ground and excited poten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. A comparison of the linear absorption spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Linear absorption spectra for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The term [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Linear absorption lineshape is shown for 3 increasing values of the dissipation parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time evolution of the populations are shown for damped dynamics, in (a) and (b), and closed dynamics, in (c) and (d). The left column [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Linear absorption spectra of stiff-stilbene using a model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Long-lived quantum coherence in photosynthetic complexes at physiological temperature

    author author G. Panitchayangkoon , author D. Hayes , author K. A. \ Fransted , author J. R. \ Caram , author E. Harel , author J. Wen , author R. E. \ Blankenship , \ and\ author G. S. \ Engel ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1005484107 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America \ volume 107 ,\ pages 12766 ( year 2010 ...

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [2]

    author author G. D. \ Scholes ,\ 10.1021/jz900062f journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 1 ,\ pages 2 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1206.5812v1 arXiv:arXiv:1206.5812v1 NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    author author G. S. \ Engel , author T. R. \ Calhoun , author E. L. \ Read , author T.-K. \ Ahn , author T. Mancal , author Y.-C. \ Cheng , author R. E. \ Blankenship , \ and\ author G. R. \ Fleming ,\ 10.1038/nature05678 journal journal Nature \ volume 446 ,\ pages 782 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature05678

  4. [4]

    Ishizaki \ and\ author G

    author author A. Ishizaki \ and\ author G. R. \ Fleming ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125126 journal journal Annu. Rev. Cond. Mat. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 333 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125126 2012

  5. [5]

    Highly efficient energy excitation transfer in light-harvesting complexes: The fundamental role of noise-assisted transport

    author author F. Caruso , author A. W. \ Chin , author A. Datta , author S. F. \ Huelga , \ and\ author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ 10.1063/1.3223548 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 131 ,\ pages 105106 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.4454 arXiv:0901.4454 NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    author author G. C. \ Knee , author P. Rowe , author L. D. \ Smith , author A. Troisi , \ and\ author A. Datta ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00829 journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2328 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01795 arXiv:1704.01795 NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [7]

    author author A. G. \ Dijkstra \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073027 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 073027 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073027 2012

  8. [8]

    \ Duan , author V

    author author H.-G. \ Duan , author V. I. \ Prokhorenko , author R. J. \ Cogdell , author K. Ashraf , author A. L. \ Stevens , author M. Thorwart , \ and\ author R. J. D. \ Miller ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1702261114 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 114 ,\ pages 8493 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1702261114

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    author author D. M. \ Wilkins \ and\ author N. S. \ Dattani ,\ 10.1021/ct501066k journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 11 ,\ pages 3411 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3654 arXiv:1411.3654 NoStop

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Baghbanzadeh \ and\ author I

    author author S. Baghbanzadeh \ and\ author I. Kassal ,\ 10.1039/c6cp00104a journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 18 ,\ pages 7459 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Kumpulainen , author B

    author author T. Kumpulainen , author B. Lang , author A. Rosspeintner , \ and\ author E. Vauthey ,\ 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00491 journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 117 ,\ pages 10826 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Szyma \' n ski , author J

    author author W. Szyma \' n ski , author J. M. \ Beierle , author H. A. \ Kistemaker , author W. A. \ Velema , \ and\ author B. L. \ Feringa ,\ 10.1021/cr300179f journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 113 ,\ pages 6114 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    Ikeda , author A

    author author T. Ikeda , author A. G. \ Dijkstra , \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ 10.1063/1.5086948 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 150 ,\ pages 114103 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Palczewski ,\ 10.1167/iovs.14-15502 journal journal Investigative ophthalmology & visual science \ volume 55 ,\ pages 6651 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    author author K. Palczewski ,\ 10.1167/iovs.14-15502 journal journal Investigative ophthalmology & visual science \ volume 55 ,\ pages 6651 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Palczewski ,\ 10.1074/jbc.R111.301150 journal journal Journal of Biological Chemistry \ volume 287 ,\ pages 1612 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author K. Palczewski ,\ 10.1074/jbc.R111.301150 journal journal Journal of Biological Chemistry \ volume 287 ,\ pages 1612 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    author author P. J. \ Johnson , author A. Halpin , author T. Morizumi , author V. I. \ Prokhorenko , author O. P. \ Ernst , \ and\ author R. J. \ Miller ,\ 10.1038/nchem.2398 journal journal Nature Chemistry \ volume 7 ,\ pages 980 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author P. J. \ Johnson , author M. H. \ Farag , author A. Halpin , author T. Morizumi , author V. I. \ Prokhorenko , author J. Knoester , author T. L. \ Jansen , author O. P. \ Ernst , \ and\ author R. J. \ Miller ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b02329 journal journal Journal of P...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Mohseni , author Y

    author author M. Mohseni , author Y. Omar , author G. S. \ Engel , \ and\ author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ 10.1017/CBO9780511863189 title Quantum Effects in Biology \ ( year 2014 )\ pp.\ pages 237--263 NoStop

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Hahn \ and\ author G

    author author S. Hahn \ and\ author G. Stock ,\ 10.1021/jp992939g journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 104 ,\ pages 1146 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [20]

    Hahn \ and\ author G

    author author S. Hahn \ and\ author G. Stock ,\ 10.1063/1.1428344 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 116 ,\ pages 1085 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  13. [21]

    author author M. H. \ Farag , author T. L. \ Jansen , \ and\ author J. Knoester ,\ 10.1039/c8cp00638e journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 12746 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    \ Breuer \ and\ author F

    author author H.-P. \ Breuer \ and\ author F. Petruccione ,\ 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001 title The Theory of Open Quantum Systems \ ( publisher OUP ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  15. [23]

    author author R. P. \ Feynman \ and\ author F. L. \ Vernon ,\ 10.1006/aphy.2000.6017 journal journal Annals of Physics \ volume 281 ,\ pages 547 ( year 2000 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0306052 arXiv:0306052 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2000

  16. [24]

    author author G. D. \ Scholes \ and\ author G. R. \ Fleming ,\ 10.1021/jp993435l journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 104 ,\ pages 1854 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  17. [25]

    Meldaikis , author O

    author author J. Meldaikis , author O. Zerlauskiene , author D. Abramavicius , \ and\ author L. Valkunas ,\ 10.1016/j.chemphys.2013.06.010 journal journal Chemical Physics \ volume 423 ,\ pages 9 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    Rancova \ and\ author D

    author author O. Rancova \ and\ author D. Abramavicius ,\ 10.1021/jp5043156 journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 118 ,\ pages 7533 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    author author R. J. \ Le Roy , author Y. Huang , \ and\ author C. Jary ,\ 10.1063/1.2354502 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 125 ,\ pages 164310 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  20. [28]

    F \" o ldi , author A

    author author P. F \" o ldi , author A. Czirj \' a k , author B. Moln \' a r , \ and\ author M. G. \ Benedict ,\ 10.1364/oe.10.000376 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 10 ,\ pages 376 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  21. [29]

    author author D. M. \ Packwood \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.061111 journal journal Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics \ volume 84 ,\ pages 061111 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  22. [30]

    author author T. L. C. \ Jansen \ and\ author J. Knoester ,\ 10.1063/1.2806179 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 127 ,\ pages 234502 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  23. [31]

    u mpfer , author K. Schulten , author J. Knoester , \ and\ author U. Kleinekath \

    author author C. Olbrich , author T. L. \ Jansen , author J. Liebers , author M. Aghtar , author J. Str \" u mpfer , author K. Schulten , author J. Knoester , \ and\ author U. Kleinekath \" o fer ,\ 10.1021/jp202619a journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 115...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Kwac , author H

    author author K. Kwac , author H. Lee , \ and\ author M. Cho ,\ 10.1063/1.1633549 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 120 ,\ pages 1477 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  25. [33]

    Garrett-Roe \ and\ author P

    author author S. Garrett-Roe \ and\ author P. Hamm ,\ 10.1063/1.2883660 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 128 ,\ pages 104507 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    Anda , author L

    author author A. Anda , author L. De Vico , author T. Hansen , \ and\ author D. Abramavi c ius ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00997 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 12 ,\ pages 5979 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    Anda , author D

    author author A. Anda , author D. Abramavi c ius , \ and\ author T. Hansen ,\ 10.1039/c7cp06583c journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1642 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    Galestian Pour , author C

    author author A. Galestian Pour , author C. N. \ Lincoln , author V. Perl \' i k , author F. S anda , \ and\ author J. Hauer ,\ 10.1039/c7cp05189a journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 19 ,\ pages 24752 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [38]

    author author C. Gardiner ,\ https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540707127 title Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences ,\ edition 4th \ ed.\ ( publisher Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg ,\ year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  30. [39]

    \ Breuer , author E.-M

    author author H.-P. \ Breuer , author E.-M. \ Laine , author J. Piilo , \ and\ author B. Vacchini ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021002 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 021002 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  31. [40]

    De Vega \ and\ author D

    author author I. De Vega \ and\ author D. Alonso ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015001 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 89 ,\ pages 015001 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06994 arXiv:1511.06994 NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  32. [41]

    author author D. V. \ Makhov , author C. Symonds , author S. Fernandez-Alberti , \ and\ author D. V. \ Shalashilin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.04.003 journal journal Chemical Physics \ volume 493 ,\ pages 200 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  33. [42]

    author author J. A. \ Green , author D. V. \ Makhov , author N. C. \ Cole-Filipiak , author C. Symonds , author V. G. \ Stavros , \ and\ author D. V. \ Shalashilin ,\ 10.1039/C8CP06359A journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 3832 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  34. [43]

    author author I. S. \ Osad'ko ,\ 10.1070/pu1979v022n05abeh005496 journal journal Soviet Physics Uspekhi \ volume 22 ,\ pages 311 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  35. [44]

    author author J. L. \ Skinner \ and\ author D. Hsu ,\ 10.1021/j100412a013 journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry \ volume 90 ,\ pages 4931 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986 doi

  36. [45]

    Okumura \ and\ author Y

    author author K. Okumura \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ 10.1063/1.474604 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 107 ,\ pages 2267 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  37. [46]

    Tanimura \ and\ author Y

    author author Y. Tanimura \ and\ author Y. Maruyama ,\ 10.1063/1.474531 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 107 ,\ pages 1779 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  38. [47]

    author author A. F. \ Fidler \ and\ author G. S. \ Engel ,\ 10.1021/jp311713x journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 117 ,\ pages 9444 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  39. [48]

    F \" o ldi , author M

    author author P. F \" o ldi , author M. Benedict , author A. Czirj \' a k , \ and\ author B. Moln \' a r ,\ 10.1002/prop.200310014 journal journal Fortschritte der Physik \ volume 51 ,\ pages 122 ( year 2003 a ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  40. [49]

    F \" o ldi , author M

    author author P. F \" o ldi , author M. G. \ Benedict , author A. Czirj \' a k , \ and\ author B. Moln \' a r ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.032104 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 67 ,\ pages 32104 ( year 2003 b ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  41. [50]

    Improta \ and\ author F

    author author R. Improta \ and\ author F. Santoro ,\ 10.1021/jp054250j journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 109 ,\ pages 10058 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  42. [51]

    Quick , author F

    author author M. Quick , author F. Berndt , author A. L. \ Dobryakov , author I. N. \ Ioffe , author A. A. \ Granovsky , author C. Knie , author R. Mahrwald , author D. Lenoir , author N. P. \ Ernsting , \ and\ author S. A. \ Kovalenko ,\ 10.1021/jp411656x journal journal Jour...

    doi

  43. [52]

    author author Ian Percival ,\ https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/physics/theoretical-physics-and-mathematical-physics/quantum-state-diffusion?format=HB & isbn=9780521620079 title Quantum state diffusion \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge ...

    1998

  44. [53]

    Kosloff , author M

    author author R. Kosloff , author M. A. \ Ratner , \ and\ author W. B. \ Davis ,\ 10.1063/1.473726 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 106 ,\ pages 7036 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  45. [54]

    Gisin \ and\ author I

    author author N. Gisin \ and\ author I. C. \ Percival ,\ 10.1088/0305-4470/25/21/023 journal journal Journal of Physics A: General Physics \ volume 25 ,\ pages 5677 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  46. [55]

    Mukamel ,\ @noop title Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 1995 ) NoStop

    author author S. Mukamel ,\ @noop title Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  47. [56]

    Valkunas , author D

    author author L. Valkunas , author D. Abramavicius , \ and\ author T. Mancal ,\ 10.1002/9783527653652 title Molecular Excitation Dynamics and Relaxation \ ( publisher Wiley-VCH ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  48. [57]

    Yuen-Zhou , author J

    author author J. Yuen-Zhou , author J. J. \ Krich , author I. Kassal , author A. S. \ Johnson , \ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ 10.1088/978-0-750-31062-8 title Ultrafast Spectroscopy \ ( publisher IOP Publishing ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  49. [58]

    author author G. C. \ Schatz \ and\ author M. A. \ Ratner ,\ @noop title Quantum Mechanics in Chemistry \ ( publisher Dover Publications ,\ address Mineola, NY ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  50. [59]

    author author J. R. \ Reimers , author K. R. \ Wilson , \ and\ author E. J. \ Heller ,\ 10.1063/1.445618 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 79 ,\ pages 4749 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983 doi

  51. [60]

    author author J. L. \ Chang ,\ 10.1016/j.jms.2005.03.004 journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 232 ,\ pages 102 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  52. [61]

    Micciarelli , author R

    author author M. Micciarelli , author R. Conte , author J. Suarez , \ and\ author M. Ceotto ,\ 10.1063/1.5041911 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 149 ,\ pages 64115 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  53. [62]

    author author H. M. \ Hulburt \ and\ author J. O. \ Hirschfelder ,\ 10.1063/1.1750827 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 61 ( year 1941 ) NoStop

    1941 doi

  54. [63]

    Huber ,\ 10.1007/978-1-4757-0961-2 title Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure \ ( publisher Springer US ,\ year 1979 ) NoStop

    author author K. Huber ,\ 10.1007/978-1-4757-0961-2 title Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure \ ( publisher Springer US ,\ year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  55. [64]

    \ Dong , author R

    author author S.-H. \ Dong , author R. Lemus , \ and\ author A. Frank ,\ 10.1002/qua.10038 journal journal International Journal of Quantum Chemistry \ volume 86 ,\ pages 433 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  56. [65]

    author author S. A. \ Kovalenko \ and\ author A. L. \ Dobryakov ,\ 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.03.073 journal journal Chemical Physics Letters \ volume 570 ,\ pages 56 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  57. [66]

    author author A. M. \ Pupasov-Maksimov ,\ 10.1088/1742-6596/670/1/012042 journal journal Journal of Physics: Conference Series \ volume 670 ,\ pages 012042 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  58. [67]

    Hermite Polynomial

    author author E. W. \ Weisstein ,\ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HermitePolynomial.html journal "Hermite Polynomial". From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource \ NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.