Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Alkali ion-to-neutral atom converter for the magneto-optical trap of a radioactive isotope

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports an ion-to-neutral-atom converter that turns alkali ions into a low-divergence neutral beam and demonstrates it by trapping 10^6 rubidium atoms in a magneto-optical trap.

desk verdict Real device, convincing MOT control, but the 10% efficiency claim is an estimate built on unmeasured assumptions; the measured Fr efficiency is the number to trust for now. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10686 v1 pith:OJAURUDA submitted 2019-08-28 physics.atom-ph

Hirokazu Kawamura , Ken-ichi Harada , Tomoya Sato , Saki Ezure , Hiroshi Arikawa , Takeshi Furukawa , Tomohiro Hayamizu , Takeshi Inoue
show 7 more authors
Taisuke Ishikawa Masatoshi Itoh Tomohiro Kato Akihito Oikawa Takatoshi Aoki Atsushi Hatakeyama Yasuhiro Sakemi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords magneto-opticaltrapradioactiveisotopesion-to-neutralconverterorthotropicsourcerubidiumfranciumSaha-Langmuirequationyttriumneutralizer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a compact converter, built from a hot yttrium target inside a platinum oven, can turn incoming alkali ions into a neutral atomic beam with small angular spread and enough efficiency to feed a magneto-optical trap. The authors trapped $10^{6}$ neutralized rubidium atoms in a MOT and detected neutralized francium atoms from an ion beam. If the device works as claimed, it closes a gap in radioactive-atom trapping: conventional neutralizers make diffuse atomic beams that cannot be pre-cooled, whereas this beam can be transversely cooled or Zeeman-slowed before trapping, making accelerator-produced radioactive isotopes more accessible to precision measurements.

What carries the argument

The central object is the converter itself: a heated platinum oven containing a 2-mm yttrium target held at negative voltage, with a 3-mm output aperture and a larger ion-entrance hole. The Saha-Langmuir equation, $n_+/n_0 = \tfrac{1}{2}\exp\big((\varphi - E_i)/k_B T\big)$, sets the surface chemistry: because yttrium's work function (3.1 eV) is below the ionization energies of rubidium (4.2 eV) and francium (4.1 eV), ions landing on yttrium neutralize, while the platinum wall, with its larger work function, re-ionizes atoms that hit it. The recycling of ions and atoms, combined with the aperture geometry, is what produces the reported low-divergence thermal beam.

What would settle it

Measure the MOT atom number with the ion beam off and on to determine the background contribution, measure the trap lifetime directly by observing the fluorescence decay after the beam is cut, and measure the output beam's velocity distribution with a time-of-flight or Doppler-spectroscopy probe; recomputing the conversion efficiency from those measured values would settle whether the device reaches the claimed 10%.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an orthotropic-source-style converter, with a negatively biased yttrium target inside a heated platinum oven, converts alkali ions into a thermal neutral atomic beam with small angular divergence, because neutral atoms that strike the platinum wall re-ionize and are pulled back to the yttrium, recycling until they escape through the aperture. The supporting demonstration uses stable rubidium: after confirming neutral Rb by reionization detection, the team loaded a MOT from the ion beam and observed $10^{6}$ trapped atoms. From the ion flux, the assumed trappable fraction, and an assumed 1-s trap lifetime, they estimate a conversion efficiency of about 10%. For francium isotopes, they obtained neutralized atoms, with a lower efficiency of 0.06% that they attribute to degraded surface conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative claims of $10^{6}$ trapped atoms and about 10% conversion efficiency rest on three unmeasured assumptions: zero trapped background atoms, a 1-second MOT lifetime, and a Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution at the oven temperature; if any of these is wrong, the numbers change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A magneto-optical trap can be loaded from an ion beam rather than from a vapor cell, so the atom source and the trap can be separated for radiation shielding.
  • Because the output beam has a roughly 100-mrad angular spread and a thermal velocity distribution, it is compatible with transverse cooling and Zeeman slowing, which should increase the fraction of trappable atoms.
  • The recycling model implies that reducing the ion-entrance hole and shortening the distance from the oven wall to the yttrium target would raise the conversion efficiency beyond the observed 10%.
  • The device can neutralize francium isotopes, but the efficiency is much lower (0.06%) for the short-lived francium species studied, and the authors attribute this to surface deterioration.
  • Long-lived radioactive alkali isotopes should be more trappable than short-lived ones because their longer durations in the oven allow more recycling cycles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the recycling model is correct, the same converter concept should generalize to other alkali atoms whose ionization energy exceeds the yttrium work function, with efficiency set mainly by surface cleanliness.
  • The 100-mrad beam divergence suggests the beam is bright enough for a straightforward Zeeman-slower or transverse-cooling test; measuring the velocity distribution directly would check the Maxwell-Boltzmann assumption used in the efficiency estimate.
  • The large gap between the rubidium (10%) and francium (0.06%) efficiencies is more consistent with surface degradation than with isotope chemistry, so a fresh-target experiment could separate those two effects.
  • The 160-s exponential decay of the beam after shutdown gives a handle on diffusion and desorption times inside the converter, which could be used to optimize the geometry without full MOT runs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the development and characterization of an ion-to-neutral atom converter based on an orthotropic source geometry, consisting of a heated yttrium target inside a platinum oven. The device is intended to convert radioactive alkali ion beams into a low-divergence thermal atomic beam suitable for magneto-optical trapping. The authors present two sets of experiments with stable 87Rb: reionization detection of the neutral output, and trapping of neutralized atoms in a MOT, with a maximum reported trapped-atom number of 10^6. They also report measurements of the emission-angle distribution, of the decay time of particles stored in the converter, and of the dependence of the output on target voltage and temperature. A brief experiment with radioactive Fr isotopes yielded neutralized Fr with an efficiency of 0.06% measured by alpha spectroscopy. The central qualitative claim is that the converter produces neutral atoms and that these atoms can be magneto-optically trapped; the quantitative claim of 'remarkable efficiency' is inferred from a model rather than directly measured.

Significance. If the device performs as claimed, it would be a useful tool for experiments that need to trap radioactive alkali isotopes, since it combines neutralization with a geometry that is compatible with transverse cooling and Zeeman slowing. The qualitative demonstration is credible and well controlled in an important respect: trapped atoms were observed only while the ion beam was on, and the voltage and temperature dependencies are consistent with the proposed mechanism. The measured angular spread of about 100 mrad is also consistent with the geometric model. However, the quantitative central claim, expressed as a conversion efficiency of about 10%, is not established by the data presented. The authors themselves note that the trapped-atom count assumes zero background, that the MOT lifetime is assumed rather than measured, and that the trappable fraction is computed from an assumed Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. The only direct efficiency measurement, for Fr, is roughly two orders of magnitude lower. The paper would be a solid technical demonstration if the efficiency claims were either properly calibrated or substantially softened.

major comments (3)
  1. [II.B, Eq. (3)] The value n = 10^6 trapped atoms and the resulting efficiency estimate eta = 10% are not supported by the evidence presented. The fluorescence signal from the CCD camera is said to be proportional to the trapped-atom number, but no calibration of this proportionality is described, and the authors state that the estimate assumes zero background atoms because background components were not measured. In addition, Eq. (3) uses a MOT lifetime of tau = 1 s that is not measured, and a trappable fraction w = 0.1% computed from an assumed Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at the oven temperature, with no measurement of the actual velocity distribution of the neutralized beam. Since eta is inversely proportional to both tau and w, an unmeasured factor-of-two error in either changes eta by the same factor. The claim that the converter achieves 'remarkable efficiency' therefore rests on unverified assumptions. The authors should either calibrate the atom number, measure tau and the velocity distribution, or clearly label eta as an order-of-magnitude estimate with a wide uncertainty.
  2. [II.B, Fr experiment] The stated application is trapping radioactive isotopes, and the only direct conversion-efficiency measurement on a radioactive alkali, Fr, gives eta = 0.06%, which is about two orders of magnitude lower than the claimed 10% for Rb. The manuscript attributes this difference to deterioration of the Pt and Y surface conditions, citing previous work on how beam irradiation or oxidation can change neutralization efficiency. However, no fresh-surface control or before/after measurement of Rb efficiency is presented, so the surface-deterioration explanation is speculative. As written, the evidence does not support the claim that the device provides high-efficiency conversion for the isotopes for which it was designed. A control measurement using a freshly prepared Y/Pt surface, or a direct comparison of Rb and Fr under identical surface conditions, would be needed to substantiate the authors' interpretation.
  3. [II.B, definition of eta] The quantity called eta in Eq. (3) is not used consistently. The text defines eta as 'the conversion efficiency of the total output of neutralized atoms to the input ions,' which would describe the converter itself. A few sentences later, however, the authors write that 'eta in our experiment included the effect that some components of the output atoms stopped at the baffle rod,' which means eta also incorporates a downstream geometric transport loss. These are different efficiencies, and the 10% figure conflates them. The authors should separate the converter neutralization efficiency from the fraction of the beam that reaches the trapping region, and state which quantity is being reported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II.A, Eq. (2)] The fit of Eq. (2) to the decay curve in Fig. 7 reports epsilon and t1, but not the fitted values of C0 and C1, the fit quality, or the uncertainty in the data used for the fit. Reporting these would allow the reader to assess whether the single-exponential model is actually a good description of the decay.
  2. [II.A, Fig. 6] The measured angular distribution in Fig. 6 is compared with a curve computed from the geometry of the converter and detector, which is helpful. It would be useful to state explicitly the aperture and filament dimensions used in that geometric calculation, since the text mentions only the 3-mm aperture and the filament size in the detector description.
  3. [II.B, Fig. 5(b)] The fluorescence signal as a function of the Y-target voltage in Fig. 5(b) is shown without error bars. The text notes that the largest uncertainty is a possible systematic error from laser-frequency fluctuations, but the absence of any error estimate makes it difficult to judge the significance of the voltage dependence.
  4. [II.A, temperature statement] The text says that reionization signals were observed at temperatures greater than 700 C, but the decay-curve measurement was performed at 700 C and the efficiency estimate uses an oven temperature of 1010 C. The temperature dependence of the relevant parameters, especially the cycle time and the desorption behavior, is not discussed in detail; a brief comment would help readers understand whether extrapolation from 700 to 1010 C is reasonable.
  5. [General] The term 'orthotropic source' is used without an explicit definition. Since the term is not standard to all readers, a one-sentence definition in the introduction or in Section II would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the converter demonstration and efficiency estimate rest on independent measurements and standard physics, not on self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the demonstration of neutralization of Rb ions, the magneto-optical trapping of 10^6 neutralized Rb atoms, and an inferred conversion efficiency of about 10%. None of these claims reduce by construction to the paper's inputs. The MOT demonstration is controlled: no trapped atoms were observed without the ion beam, the fluorescence signal increased with the attracting voltage as expected, and the measured angular spread of about 100 mrad matched the geometric prediction from the converter dimensions and detector geometry. These are external, falsifiable observations not built into the model. Equation (2) fits the recycle probability epsilon and cycle time t1 to the measured decay curve; this is parameter estimation, not circular prediction, and it does not feed back into the conversion efficiency estimate. Equation (3), n = I*eta*w*tau, is used to estimate eta = 10% from the measured n = 10^6 trapped atoms, the estimated incident ion rate I, the Maxwell-Boltzmann trappable fraction w = 0.1%, and an assumed MOT lifetime tau = 1 s. These inputs are separate assumptions, not the target result; the estimate is an inference, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that the direct Fr measurement gave only eta = 0.06%, which it attributes to surface deterioration. That discrepancy is a correctness and verification concern, not a circularity. The paper cites several works by the same group (e.g., refs. 23-25, 32, 35, 36), but those citations document experimental infrastructure and prior apparatus, not the load-bearing physics. The neutralization mechanism rests on the standard Saha-Langmuir equation and tabulated work functions and ionization potentials. The central derivation is therefore self-contained, and any weaknesses are in assumptions and unmeasured systematics rather than in circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central device claims rest on standard surface chemistry plus several engineering assumptions. The quantitative efficiency estimate requires three assumed unknowns: zero background, tau=1 s, and a thermal velocity distribution. The recycling model parameters are fit to a decay curve. No speculative physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • epsilon (escape probability per cycle) = (1.2 +/- 0.3) x 10^-3
    Fitted to the exponential decay of the reionization detector count rate in Figure 7 using Eq. (2); used to quantify the recycling effect.
  • t1 (cycle duration) = (0.17 +/- 0.04) s
    Fitted to the same decay curve in Figure 7; includes surface diffusion and desorption time.
  • C0 and C1 (fit constants) = not stated
    Integration constants in Eq. (2) from the exponential fit to the decay curve; numeric values are not reported.
  • MOT lifetime tau = 1 s (assumed)
    Assumed in Eq. (3) to convert trapped atom number into conversion efficiency; not measured in the paper.
  • trappable fraction w = 0.1% (computed from assumed thermal distribution)
    Computed from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at 1010 C and a capture velocity of 60 m/s; not directly measured and enters the eta estimate.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Saha-Langmuir equation (Eq. 1) describes the equilibrium ratio of alkali ions to atoms on hot metal surfaces and applies to yttrium and platinum at the operating temperatures.
    Invoked in Section II to justify neutralization on yttrium and reionization on platinum. This is a standard surface physics model, but the surface work functions and the condition of the coated surfaces are not measured in situ.
  • ad hoc to paper Nearly all particles entering the converter remain inside, recycling between the walls and the yttrium target, as assumed before Eq. (2).
    This confinement and recycling assumption is the basis for the claimed small angular divergence and high efficiency. It is modeled rather than directly verified, and the fitted escape probability epsilon only characterizes the assumed model.
  • domain assumption Desorbed neutral atoms follow a Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution at the oven temperature, and the capture velocity is given by the simplified relation vc = sqrt(r hbar k gamma / m).
    Used in Section II.B to compute the trappable fraction w = 0.1%, which enters the eta estimate. No direct velocity measurement is presented.
  • domain assumption The platinum oven wall acts as an ionizer for alkali atoms, returning them to the yttrium target before they can escape through the aperture.
    Core mechanism for the claimed recycling and narrow beam divergence; relies on the work function difference between platinum and yttrium and is supported only qualitatively by SIMION field calculations.
  • domain assumption The difference between the rubidium and francium conversion efficiencies is attributed to deterioration of the surface conditions of platinum and yttrium.
    Proposed in Section II.B as an explanation for eta dropping to 0.06%; the paper states that more detailed investigation is needed, so the explanation is untested.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Alkali ion-to-neutral atom converter for the magneto-optical trap of a radioactive isotope." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OJAURUDA

@misc{pith2026190810686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Alkali ion-to-neutral atom converter for the magneto-optical trap of a radioactive isotope},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OJAURUDA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10686}
}
abstract

We have developed a unique neutralizer device that uses an yttrium target surrounded by a platinum wall to magneto-optically trap radioactive atoms. In general, the radioactive nucleus produced in a nuclear reaction is extracted and transported in ion form. For the magneto-optical trap, thermal neutralization must occur on the surface of a metal with a small work function. The converter can produce a neutral atomic beam with small angular divergence that, given the recycling of atoms and ions, converts ions into neutral atoms with remarkable efficiency. We demonstrated the ion neutralization process using stable rubidium and confirmed $10^6$ neutralized atoms in the magneto-optical trap. Additionally, the experiment using francium demonstrated the obtaining of neutralized francium atoms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.10686 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Ion-to-atom converter based on the orthotropic sour [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Results of the electric field calculation with SIMION [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Overall view of the apparatus, from the Rb ion source t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Setup of the reionization detector, which can measur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Attracting-neutralizer voltage dependence for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Emission angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time evolution for counting rate after the ion beam st [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Setup of the magneto-optical trap. The direction ort [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ginges \ and\ author V

    author author J. Ginges \ and\ author V. Flambaum ,\ title title Violations of fundamental symmetries in atoms and tests of unification theories of elementary particles , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.03.005 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 397 ,\ pages 63 -- 154 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.03.005 2004

  2. [2]

    Sheng , author L

    author author D. Sheng , author L. A. \ Orozco , \ and\ author E. Gomez ,\ title title Preliminary studies for anapole moment measurements in rubidium and francium , \ http://stacks.iop.org/0953-4075/43/i=7/a=074004 journal journal Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics \ volume 43 ,\ pages 074004 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Aoki , author Y

    author author T. Aoki , author Y. Torii , author B. K. \ Sahoo , author B. P. \ Das , author K. Harada , author T. Hayamizu , author K. Sakamoto , author H. Kawamura , author T. Inoue , author A. Uchiyama , author S. Ito , author R. Yoshioka , author K. S. \ Tanaka , author M. Itoh , author A. Hatakeyama , \ and\ author Y. Sakemi ,\ title title Parity-non...

    work page

  4. [4]

    \ Lu , author C

    author author Z.-T. \ Lu , author C. Bowers , author S. J. \ Freedman , author B. K. \ Fujikawa , author J. L. \ Mortara , author S.-Q. \ Shang , author K. P. \ Coulter , \ and\ author L. Young ,\ title title Laser trapping of short-lived radioactive isotopes , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3791 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 3791--3794 ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3791

  5. [5]

    Gwinner , author J

    author author G. Gwinner , author J. A. \ Behr , author S. B. \ Cahn , author A. Ghosh , author L. A. \ Orozco , author G. D. \ Sprouse , \ and\ author F. Xu ,\ title title Magneto-optic trapping of radioactive ^ 79 Rb , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3795 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 3795--3798 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3795

  6. [6]

    author author J. R. A. \ Pitcairn , author D. Roberge , author A. Gorelov , author D. Ashery , author O. Aviv , author J. A. \ Behr , author P. G. \ Bricault , author M. Dombsky , author J. D. \ Holt , author K. P. \ Jackson , author B. Lee , author M. R. \ Pearson , author A. Gaudin , author B. Dej , author C. H\"ohr , author G. Gwinner , \ and\ author D...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.015501

  7. [7]

    Di Rosa , author S

    author author M. Di Rosa , author S. Crane , author J. Kitten , author W. Taylor , author D. Vieira , \ and\ author X. Zhao ,\ title title Magneto-optical trap and mass-separator system for the ultra-sensitive detection of ^ 135 Cs and ^ 137 Cs , \ 10.1007/s00340-002-1063-9 journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume 76 ,\ pages 45--55 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s00340-002-1063-9

  8. [8]

    author author M. R. \ Kalita , author J. A. \ Behr , author A. Gorelov , author M. R. \ Pearson , author A. C. \ DeHart , author G. Gwinner , author M. J. \ Kossin , author L. A. \ Orozco , author S. Aubin , author E. Gomez , author M. S. \ Safronova , author V. A. \ Dzuba , \ and\ author V. V. \ Flambaum ,\ title title Isotope shifts in the 7s 8s transit...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042507

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    author author J. E. \ Simsarian , author A. Ghosh , author G. Gwinner , author L. A. \ Orozco , author G. D. \ Sprouse , \ and\ author P. A. \ Voytas ,\ title title Magneto-optic trapping of ^ 210 Fr , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3522 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 76 ...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Guckert , author X

    author author R. Guckert , author X. Zhao , author S. G. \ Crane , author A. Hime , author W. A. \ Taylor , author D. Tupa , author D. J. \ Vieira , \ and\ author H. Wollnik ,\ title title Magneto-optical trapping of radioactive ^ 82 Rb atoms , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.R1637 jour...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Aubin , author E

    author author S. Aubin , author E. Gomez , author L. A. \ Orozco , \ and\ author G. D. \ Sprouse ,\ title title High efficiency magneto-optical trap for unstable isotopes , \ 10.1063/1.1606093 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 74 ,\ pages 4342--4351 ( y...

    doi

  4. [12]

    de Mauro , author R

    author author C. de Mauro , author R. Calabrese , author L. Corradi , author A. Dainelli , author A. Khanbekyan , author E. Mariotti , author P. Minguzzi , author L. Moi , author S. Sanguinetti , author G. Stancari , author L. Tomassetti , \ and\ author S. Veronesi ,\ title ti...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Slowe , author L

    author author C. Slowe , author L. Vernac , \ and\ author L. V. \ Hau ,\ title title High flux source of cold rubidium atoms , \ 10.1063/1.2069651 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 76 ,\ pages 103101 ( year 2005 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Welte , author F

    author author J. Welte , author F. Ritterbusch , author I. Steinke , author M. Henrich , author W. Aeschbach-Hertig , \ and\ author M. K. \ Oberthaler ,\ title title Towards the realization of atom trap trace analysis for ^ 39 Ar , \ http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/12/i=6/a=06...

    2010

  7. [15]

    Levy , author R

    author author C. Levy , author R. Baartman , author K. Jayamanna , author R. Kiefl , author T. Kuo , author M. Olivo , author G. Wight , author D. Yuan , \ and\ author A. Zelenski ,\ title title A polarized beams project at isac , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01593-...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author J. F. \ Sell , author K. Gulyuz , \ and\ author G. D. \ Sprouse ,\ title title Collinear laser spectroscopy of francium using online rubidium vapor neutralization and amplitude modulated lasers , \ 10.1063/1.3271037 journal journal Review of Scientific Instrument...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Touchard , author J

    author author F. Touchard , author J. Biderman , author M. de Saint Simon , author C. Thibault , author G. Huber , author M. Epherre , \ and\ author R. Klapisch ,\ title title production of ionic and atomic beams of alkaline elements , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(81)90...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author H. H. \ Stroke ,\ title title Optical spectroscopy of radioactive atoms , \ 10.1007/s10751-007-9513-8 journal journal Hyperfine Interactions \ volume 171 ,\ pages 3--40 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    Pinard , author H

    author author J. Pinard , author H. Duong , author D. Marescaux , author H. Stroke , author O. Redi , author M. Gustafsson , author T. Nilsson , author S. Matsuki , author Y. Kishimoto , author K. Kominato , author I. Ogawa , author M. Shibata , author M. Tada , author J. Pers...

  12. [20]

    Nagae , author K

    author author D. Nagae , author K. Asahi , author H. Miyoshi , author K. Shimada , author A. Yoshimi , author H. Ueno , author J. Murata , author M. Uchida , author D. Kameda , author G. Kato , author S. Emori , author G. Kijima , author S. Oshima , author M. Takemura , author...

  13. [21]

    Dinneen , author A

    author author T. Dinneen , author A. Ghiorso , \ and\ author H. Gould ,\ title title An orthotropic source of thermal atoms , \ 10.1063/1.1146804 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 67 ,\ pages 752--755 ( year 1996 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.or...

    doi

  14. [22]

    \ Lu , author K

    author author Z.-T. \ Lu , author K. L. \ Corwin , author K. R. \ Vogel , author C. E. \ Wieman , author T. P. \ Dinneen , author J. Maddi , \ and\ author H. Gould ,\ title title Efficient collection of ^ 221 Fr into a vapor cell magneto-optical trap , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Kawamura , author H

    author author H. Kawamura , author H. Arikawa , author S. Ezure , author K. Harada , author T. Hayamizu , author T. Inoue , author T. Ishikawa , author M. Itoh , author T. Kato , author T. Sato , author T. Aoki , author T. Furukawa , author A. Hatakeyama , author K. Hatanaka ,...

  16. [24]

    Inoue , author S

    author author T. Inoue , author S. Ando , author T. Aoki , author H. Arikawa , author S. Ezure , author K. Harada , author T. Hayamizu , author T. Ishikawa , author M. Itoh , author K. Kato , author H. Kawamura , author A. Uchiyama , author T. Aoki , author K. Asahi , author T...

  17. [25]

    Harada , author T

    author author K. Harada , author T. Aoki , author S. Ezure , author K. Kato , author T. Hayamizu , author H. Kawamura , author T. Inoue , author H. Arikawa , author T. Ishikawa , author T. Aoki , author A. Uchiyama , author K. Sakamoto , author S. Ito , author M. Itoh , author...

  18. [26]

    ,\ @noop title All for Researchers

    author author KITANO SEIKI CO., LTD. ,\ @noop title All for Researchers. KITANO , \ howpublished https://www.kitano-seiki.co.jp/en/index.html NoStop

  19. [27]

    Scientific Instrument Services ,\ http://simion.com/ title Simion 8.1 , \ NoStop

    author author I. Scientific Instrument Services ,\ http://simion.com/ title Simion 8.1 , \ NoStop

  20. [28]

    Langmuir \ and\ author K

    author author I. Langmuir \ and\ author K. H. \ Kingdon ,\ title title Thermionic effects caused by vapours of alkali metals , \ 10.1098/rspa.1925.0005 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences \ volume 107 ,\...

    1925

  21. [29]

    author author M. J. \ Copley \ and\ author T. E. \ Phipps ,\ title title The surface ionization of potassium on tungsten , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.48.960 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 48 ,\ pages 960--968 ( year 1935 ) NoStop

    1935 doi

  22. [30]

    author author T. K. \ Sato , author M. Asai , author A. Borschevsky , author T. Stora , author N. Sato , author Y. Kaneya , author K. Tsukada , author C. E. \ Dullmann , author K. Eberhardt , author E. Eliav , author S. Ichikawa , author U. Kaldor , author J. V. \ Kratz , auth...

  23. [31]

    Lide (ed), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th Edition

    @noop note As quoted from various sources in an online version of: David R. Lide (ed), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th Edition. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida, 2003; Section 10, Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics; Ionization Potentials of Atoms and Atomic Ions NoStop

    2003

  24. [32]

    , author Furukawa, T

    author author Sato, Tomoya , author Ezure, S. , author Furukawa, T. , author Harada, K. , author Hayamizu, T. , author Itoh, M. , author Kato, T. , author Kawamura, H. , author Liu, S. , author Nataraj, H. S. , author Oikawa, A. , author Saito, M. , author Yoshida, H. P. , \ a...

    2011

  25. [33]

    Melconian , author M

    author author D. Melconian , author M. Trinczek , author A. Gorelov , author W. Alford , author J. Behr , author J. D’Auria , author M. Dombsky , author U. Giesen , author K. Jackson , author T. Swanson , \ and\ author W. Wong ,\ title title Release of ^ 37 K from catcher foil...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author L. P. \ Smith ,\ title title The emission of positive ions from tungsten and molybdenum , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.35.381 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 35 ,\ pages 381--395 ( year 1930 ) NoStop

    1930 doi

  27. [35]

    , author Aoki, T

    author author Sato, Tomoya , author Ando, S. , author Aoki, T. , author Arikawa, H. , author Ezure, S. , author Harada, K. , author Hayamizu, T. , author Inoue, T. , author Ishikawa, T. , author Itoh, M. , author Kato, K. , author Kato, T. , author Kawamura, H. , author Natara...

  28. [36]

    author author T. Aoki ,\ title Study of an ion to neutral atom conversion process for the search for the electron electric dipole moment [in Japanese] ,\ @noop Master's thesis ,\ school Department of Physics, Tohoku University ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.