Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Field-Effect Transistor based on Surface Negative Refraction in Weyl Nanowires

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A slanted gate voltage on a Weyl-semimetal nanowire can switch off its longitudinal conductance through perfect negative refraction between surface Fermi arcs.

desk verdict A clever Fermi-arc negative-refraction FET proposal whose gate-controlled switching is asserted, not derived; the transport model is coherent but the control mechanism fails to hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11102 v1 pith:6ETFXXZV submitted 2019-08-29 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Guangze Chen , Wei Chen , Oded Zilberberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords WeylsemimetalFermiarcsnegativerefractionfield-effecttransistornanowiresurfacetransportgate-tunableconductancetopologicalstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a field-effect transistor built from a Weyl semimetal nanowire, with current carried by surface Fermi-arc states instead of a doped semiconductor bulk. Its central claim is that a gate voltage applied as a gradient along the wire tilts the Fermi arcs on opposite faces in opposite directions, so that electrons crossing from one face to the next reverse their longitudinal velocity, an effect called perfect negative refraction. For straight Fermi arcs this cancels the longitudinal conductance completely, realizing an electrically controlled on/off switch with high on/off ratio and low power consumption. The authors test the mechanism against curved Fermi arcs and surface disorder and find that the switch-off survives in the experimentally relevant regime of opposite surface dispersion. If the claim is right, topological surface states can serve as the working channel of a practical low-power transistor.

What carries the argument

The central object is the relative tilting of two surface Fermi arcs, captured by the effective surface Hamiltonian $H_{I,II}(k) = \hbar v_0(\sin\theta\, k'_x \pm \cos\theta\, k_z) + \varepsilon_{I,II}(k)$, where the $\pm$ sign gives opposite arc orientations on adjacent surfaces. The mechanism works because momentum along the edge, $k_z$, is conserved when an electron transfers from surface I to surface II, while the $z$-velocity reverses sign; the combination forces negative refraction and, in the straight-arc limit, complete cancellation of the longitudinal current. The quantitative argument is carried by the quasi-classical conductance formula $G = 2Le^2\rho_0\bar v_z$ with $\bar v_z$ an average of the refracted velocity over incident surface states, and it is corroborated by tight-binding lattice calculations in which the surface-state bands develop a gap at finite $\theta$.

What would settle it

Measure the longitudinal conductance of a Weyl-semimetal nanowire with split gates while ramping a linear voltage gradient: if the conductance does not drop sharply toward zero at some gradient and recover when the gradient is removed, the negative-refraction switch is not operating. A more direct check is surface-sensitive spectroscopy under gating: the predicted Fermi-arc rotation with gate voltage should be visible as a changing arc angle, and arcs that stay fixed under the gate would falsify the model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the longitudinal conductance of a Weyl nanowire can be controlled entirely by the relative orientation of Fermi arcs on adjacent surfaces. For a minimal inversion-symmetric Weyl semimetal with two Weyl points, a gradient gate voltage is modeled as a rotation of the Weyl-point orientation from $\phi_0$ to $\phi(V)$, which tilts each surface Fermi arc by $\theta(V)$. When the arcs are straight, the surface velocities obey $v^x_I = v^x_{II}$ and $v^z_I = -v^z_{II}$ at the shared edge, so an electron's longitudinal velocity is reversed upon crossing between surfaces; the quasi-classical conductance $G = 2Le^2\rho_0\bar v_z$ then vanishes identically. The paper further shows that opposite surface dispersion ($\varepsilon_I = -\varepsilon_{II}$) preserves the complete switch-off beyond a critical tilt angle, while equal dispersion ($\varepsilon_I = \varepsilon_{II}$) degrades the on/off ratio, and that surface disorder barely affects the switch-off region. This is the WEYLFET: a gate-tunable gap in the nanowire's surface-state spectrum, equivalent in the 1D picture to a metal-to-insulator transition for the surface channel.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a voltage gradient along the nanowire actually rotates the bulk Weyl-point orientation and tilts the Fermi arcs by the assumed angle $\theta(V)$; the paper asserts this mapping between gate voltage and arc tilt without deriving it from electrostatics or band bending.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For straight Fermi arcs, even an infinitesimal tilt angle switches the longitudinal conductance off completely, giving a digital on/off response rather than a gradual one.
  • With opposite surface dispersion, the device still switches off completely, but only after the tilt exceeds a critical angle $\theta_0 = \arctan(v_0/(\sqrt{2}\,k_0 d))$.
  • With equal surface dispersion, the conductance falls with tilt but never vanishes, so the on/off ratio degrades as arc curvature grows.
  • In the 1D nanowire picture, gating corresponds to opening and closing a gap in the surface-state bands, so the WEYLFET acts as a gate-tunable metal/insulator switch.
  • Surface disorder does not destroy the switch-off region in the inversion-symmetric model, so the device's on/off function survives realistic roughness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same relative-arc-orientation control could be used as an electrically reconfigurable beam splitter or directional coupler for surface electrons, since the refraction angle is set by $\theta(V)$.
  • Editorially, the model becomes a predictive device tool only once the calibration between gate voltage and $\theta$ is measured; a switch-off voltage measurement would effectively determine that relation.
  • If the mechanism transfers to phononic or photonic Weyl systems, a mechanical strain could play the role of the gate and extend the switch to classical wave transport.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a field-effect transistor ("WEYLFET") based on a Weyl-semimetal nanowire. The idea is that a gradient gate voltage tilts the Fermi arcs on the nanowire surfaces, so that adjacent surfaces acquire opposite tilt; for straight Fermi arcs (d=0), the group velocities satisfy vI_x=vII_x and vI_z=-vII_z, producing perfect negative refraction and a complete suppression of the longitudinal conductance. The authors derive a semiclassical conductance formula, study the effect of dispersive arcs and surface disorder, and perform KWANT tight-binding simulations of a lattice model with rotated Weyl points, finding a surface gap and conductance suppression at finite tilt angle. The paper concludes that the device offers a high on/off ratio with low power consumption.

Significance. If the actuation were real, this would be a conceptually appealing way to make a topological transistor. The negative-refraction cancellation for straight arcs is internally consistent: from Eq. (2), vI_x=vII_x and vI_z=-vII_z for d=0, so the conductance formula (3)-(4) indeed vanishes for any nonzero theta. The KWANT calculations for a rotated bulk Hamiltonian independently confirm that the surface spectrum becomes gapped, which strengthens the claim that the mechanism is not merely an artifact of the surface Hamiltonian. The paper also identifies material requirements (weak surface dispersion, chiral channels, small Fermi-arc curvature) and gives a specific switch-off angle for oppositely dispersing surfaces. However, the device-level significance is currently not established, because the only proposed control—the gate-induced rotation of the Weyl-point orientation—is asserted rather than derived, and for the ideal straight-arc case it would require moving the bulk Weyl nodes by an electrostatic field, which is physically not possible.

major comments (2)
  1. [Device concept and text around Fig. 1] The central actuation step is assumed, not derived. The text states that a slanted gate voltage "effectively tilts" the open surfaces and that the gating produces a rotation of the Weyl points from phi0 to phi(V), leading to theta(V)=phi0-arctan[tan(phi(V))/sqrt(2)], but no electrostatic, band-bending, or material-specific calculation is given to justify this mapping. In a real crystal, the bulk Weyl-node positions are fixed by the lattice and by symmetry, and a gate-induced scalar potential cannot rotate them. For the d=0 case used for the sharp switch-off, the Fermi arc is the straight line between the two Weyl-point projections; tilting that straight arc by theta is equivalent to moving its endpoints, i.e. moving the bulk Weyl nodes. This is load-bearing, because the gate-induced tilt is the only mechanism that converts the negative-refraction geometry of Eq. (2) into a transistor. I ask the authors to derive the mapping from a microscopic model of the gated nanowire, or to include the gate potential explicitly in the Hamiltonian and show that it produces the assumed arc tilt; alternatively, the device claim should be reframed and theta treated as an externally controlled parameter without claiming field-effect control. The limitations acknowledged in the final paragraph do not cover this missing step.
  2. [KWANT simulations, Figs. 3 and 4] The numerical simulations verify the response to a given tilt angle theta, but they do not test the gate-control step. In Fig. 3 the band structure is compared for theta=0 and theta=pi/6 by imposing the tilted configuration on the lattice Hamiltonian; in Fig. 4 the conductance is plotted as a function of theta. No term representing the gradient gate voltage is included in the tight-binding model, so the calculations demonstrate that a rotated Weyl-node configuration opens a surface gap and suppresses the longitudinal conductance, not that an applied gate voltage produces that configuration. The manuscript should state this distinction explicitly and, if the device claim is retained, add a simulation in which the gate is represented as a spatially varying potential and the tilt is computed self-consistently from the resulting electronic structure.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 and footnotes [38,39]] The switch-off angle theta0 = arctan[v0/(sqrt(2) k0 d)] is a key quantitative prediction but appears only in footnote [38]; please state it in the main text and provide a derivation, and similarly define the boundary k1_x in footnote [39].
  2. [Around Fig. 2] The sentence "even infinitesimal gating should lead to an on/off control" is only true for exactly straight arcs (d=0); for eps_I=-eps_II and d>0 the switch-off occurs at a finite theta0, and for eps_I=eps_II the conductance does not vanish. Please qualify.
  3. [Text before Fig. 1(d)] The relation theta(V)=phi0-arctan[tan(phi(V))/sqrt(2)] is not derived in the manuscript and is attributed to the unpublished companion paper [33]; if [33] remains unavailable, this geometric input should be derived in an appendix or a published reference supplied.
  4. [Eq. (3)] The symbol +/-k0_x in the integration limits is not defined; clarify that it is the k'_x-coordinate of the Weyl-point projection for the given phi.
  5. [Figs. 4(c)-(d) and disorder discussion] The statement that the on/off ratio "remains almost the same" under surface disorder should be quantified, because the text also reports that the conductance decreases with disorder strength; please specify whether the decrease occurs in the on-state or the off-state.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Gate-induced Weyl-node rotation is imported from the authors' own unpublished companion paper [33], making the central control step load-bearing self-citation; the negative-refraction calculation itself is independent.

  1. self citation load bearing [Device description after Eq. (1), p. 2: 'The gating results in rotation...' and Eq. (2)]
    "The gating results in rotation of the Weyl points with angle ϕ0− ϕ(V ). It corresponds to a tilting of the Fermi arcs by an angle θ(V ) =ϕ0− tan−1[tanϕ(V )/√2] in the surface Brillouin zone [33] [Fig. 1(d)]."

    This sentence supplies the only control mechanism of the WEYLFET: a gate voltage V rotates the bulk Weyl points (ϕ0 → ϕ(V)), tilting the Fermi arcs by θ(V). The relation is not derived in the paper by any electrostatic, band-bending, or material-specific calculation; it is attributed to reference [33], a same-author manuscript 'in preparation.' Every subsequent claim of a gate-induced, sharp conductance switch-off depends on this mapping. The KWANT simulations in Figs. 3-4 implement the tilt by directly rotating the Hamiltonian, not by applying a gate potential, so they verify the negative-refraction gap but not the gate-control step. The load-bearing device-control premise therefore rests on an unverified self-citation rather than on an argument contained in the paper.

full rationale

The negative-refraction transport calculation itself is largely self-contained and not circular: given the tilted straight-arc surface Hamiltonian in Eq. (2), the velocity relation vI_x = vII_x and vI_z = -vII_z follows algebraically, and the resulting conductance suppression is a direct consequence of that model. The KWANT tight-binding calculation with a rotated bulk Hamiltonian independently reproduces the gap opening and the conductance switching as a function of arc tilt, so the core negative-refraction mechanism has independent numerical support within the paper. The circularity burden lies in the device-control premise: the paper asserts that a gradient gate voltage rotates the bulk Weyl points and thereby tilts the Fermi arcs by θ(V), but the only cited support for this geometric relation is the authors' own unpublished companion paper [33]. No electrostatic or band-bending derivation is provided, and the numerics do not simulate an actual gate potential. Because the central WEYLFET claim (gate-tunable on/off switch) depends on this unverified self-citation, the score is raised to 4. The physical plausibility of the gate-induced rotation is a correctness risk rather than an additional circularity, so the score is not higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation is a model demonstration. The central free parameter is the gate-induced tilt angle theta, which is never related to the applied voltage by a derivation. The surface Hamiltonian and the negative refraction picture are inherited from the authors' own unpublished companion paper [33], and the gate-tilt mapping is an ad hoc assumption. No data are fitted, so the circularity burden is moderate rather than severe.

free parameters (4)
  • Fermi arc tilt angle theta(V)
    The central control parameter. The paper computes conductance as a function of theta but never derives theta from the gate voltage V; the relation is assumed.
  • Surface dispersion strength d
    Varies the curvature of Fermi arcs in Eq. (2); chosen by hand to model realistic dispersion, not fitted to data.
  • On-site surface potential U
    Used in tight-binding simulations to model surface dispersion and disorder; values are model parameters, not material-specific fits.
  • Bulk and surface model parameters (v, M, k0, v0) = v = 10^6 m/s, M = 4.375 eV nm^2, k0 = 0.1 nm^-1, v0 = 10^6 m/s
    Chosen as representative values for the numerical plots; not fitted to any specific Weyl material.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The minimal inversion-symmetric two-node Weyl Hamiltonian Eq. (1) describes the nanowire bulk.
    Standard low-energy model, but real materials have multiple node pairs and additional symmetry constraints.
  • domain assumption The surface Fermi arcs are captured by the linear Hamiltonian Eq. (2) with endpoints at the Weyl point projections and with the stated tilt angle theta.
    The geometry is taken from the authors' companion work [33], which is unpublished and not available in the preprint.
  • ad hoc to paper A gradient gate voltage produces the rotation phi_0 to phi(V) and the corresponding Fermi arc tilt theta(V).
    This is the load-bearing assumption that links the device control to the transport calculation; it is asserted, not derived.
  • domain assumption kz is conserved during transmission between adjacent surfaces, so the refraction problem reduces to matching velocities at fixed kz.
    Used in Eq. (4) for the quasi-classical conductance; assumes the corner between surfaces does not break translational invariance along the wire.
  • domain assumption Transport is dominated by surface states of an ideal Weyl semimetal.
    Stated as essential in the paper and revisited in the limitations; bulk carriers would add a background conductance and screening.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Field-Effect Transistor based on Surface Negative Refraction in Weyl Nanowires." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6ETFXXZV

@misc{pith2026190811102,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Field-Effect Transistor based on Surface Negative Refraction in Weyl Nanowires},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6ETFXXZV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11102}
}
read the original abstract

Weyl semimetals are characterized by their bulk Weyl points -- conical band touching points that carry a topological monopole charge -- and Fermi arc states that span between the Weyl points on the surface of the material. Recently, significant progress has been made towards understanding and measuring the physical properties of Weyl semimetals. Yet, potential applications remain relatively sparse. Here, we propose Weyl semimetal nanowires as field-effect transistors, dubbed WEYLFETs. Specifically, applying gradient gate voltage along the nanowire, an electrical field is generated that effectively tilts the open surfaces, thus, varying the relative orientation between Fermi arcs on different surfaces. As a result, perfect negative refraction between adjacent surfaces can occur and longitudinal conductance along the wire is suppressed. The WEYLFET offers a high on/off ratio with low power consumption. Adverse effects due to dispersive Fermi arcs and surface disorder are studied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11102 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the Weyl semimetal field-effect transis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The Fermi arcs defined by Eq. (2) with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Band structure of the Weyl nanowire for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerical simulation of adverse effect to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Nega- tive refraction in fermi arc surface states of weyl semimet- als,

    Guangze Chen, Wei Chen, and Oded Zilberberg, “Nega- tive refraction in fermi arc surface states of weyl semimet- als,” in preparation (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Carlos Galup-Montoro et al., MOSFET modeling for cir- cuit analysis and design (World scientific, 2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [2]

    Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect tran- sistors,

    Ali Javey, Jing Guo, Qian Wang, Mark Lundstrom, and Hongjie Dai, “Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect tran- sistors,” nature 424, 654 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [3]

    Graphene transistors,

    Frank Schwierz, “Graphene transistors,” Nature nan- otechnology 5, 487 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [4]

    Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015–2018 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [5]

    Quantum anomalous hall ef- fect in hg 1−ymnyTe quantum wells,

    Chao-Xing Liu, Xiao-Liang Qi, Xi Dai, Zhong Fang, and Shou-Cheng Zhang, “Quantum anomalous hall ef- fect in hg 1−ymnyTe quantum wells,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 146802 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [6]

    Quantized anomalous hall effect in magnetic 5 topological insulators,

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, “Quantized anomalous hall effect in magnetic 5 topological insulators,” Science 329, 61–64 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [7]

    Colloquium: topo- logical insulators,

    M Zahid Hasan and Charles L Kane, “Colloquium: topo- logical insulators,” Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Topological insulators and superconductors,

    Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang, “Topological insulators and superconductors,” Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  2. [9]

    Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator,

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, “Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous hall effect...

    2013

  3. [10]

    The quantum anomalous hall effect: Theory and exper- iment,

    Chao-Xing Liu, Shou-Cheng Zhang, and Xiao-Liang Qi, “The quantum anomalous hall effect: Theory and exper- iment,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 301–321 (2016)

    2016

  4. [11]

    Engineering chiral edge states in two-dimensional topo- logical insulator/ferromagnetic insulator heterostruc- tures,

    Xi-Rong Chen, Wei Chen, L. B. Shao, and D. Y. Xing, “Engineering chiral edge states in two-dimensional topo- logical insulator/ferromagnetic insulator heterostruc- tures,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 085417 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    Topological semimetal and fermi- arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates,

    Xiangang Wan, Ari M Turner, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Sergey Y Savrasov, “Topological semimetal and fermi- arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates,” Physical Review B 83, 205101 (2011)

    2011

  6. [13]

    Phase transition between the quan- tum spin hall and insulator phases in 3d: emergence of a topological gapless phase,

    Shuichi Murakami, “Phase transition between the quan- tum spin hall and insulator phases in 3d: emergence of a topological gapless phase,” New Journal of Physics 9, 356 (2007)

    2007

  7. [14]

    Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer,

    A. A. Burkov and Leon Balents, “Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127205 (2011)

    2011

  8. [15]

    Three-dimensional dirac semimetal and quantum transport in cd 3 as 2,

    Zhijun Wang, Hongming Weng, Quansheng Wu, Xi Dai, and Zhong Fang, “Three-dimensional dirac semimetal and quantum transport in cd 3 as 2,” Physical Review B 88, 125427 (2013)

    2013

  9. [16]

    Weyl semimetal phase in noncen- trosymmetric transition-metal monophosphides,

    Hongming Weng, Chen Fang, Zhong Fang, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Xi Dai, “Weyl semimetal phase in noncen- trosymmetric transition-metal monophosphides,” Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015)

    2015

  10. [17]

    A weyl fermion semimetal with surface fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide taas class,

    Shin-Ming Huang, Su-Yang Xu, Ilya Belopolski, Chi- Cheng Lee, Guoqing Chang, BaoKai Wang, Nasser Ali- doust, Guang Bian, Madhab Neupane, Chenglong Zhang, et al., “A weyl fermion semimetal with surface fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide taas class,” Nature communic...

    2015

  11. [18]

    Quantum hall effects in a weyl semimetal: Possible application in pyrochlore iridates,

    Kai-Yu Yang, Yuan-Ming Lu, and Ying Ran, “Quantum hall effects in a weyl semimetal: Possible application in pyrochlore iridates,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 075129 (2011)

    2011

  12. [19]

    Photocurrents in weyl semimetals,

    Ching-Kit Chan, Netanel H. Lindner, Gil Refael, and Patrick A. Lee, “Photocurrents in weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 041104 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    Colossal mid-infrared bulk photovoltaic effect in a type-i weyl semimetal,

    Gavin B Osterhoudt, Laura K Diebel, Mason J Gray, Xu Yang, John Stanco, Xiangwei Huang, Bing Shen, Ni Ni, Philip JW Moll, Ying Ran, et al. , “Colossal mid-infrared bulk photovoltaic effect in a type-i weyl semimetal,” Nature materials 18, 471 (2019)

    2019

  14. [21]

    Experimental discovery of weyl semimetal taas,

    BQ Lv, HM Weng, BB Fu, XP Wang, Hu Miao, Jun- zhang Ma, P Richard, XC Huang, LX Zhao, GF Chen, et al. , “Experimental discovery of weyl semimetal taas,” Physical Review X 5, 031013 (2015)

    2015

  15. [22]

    Discovery of a weyl fermion semimetal and topo- logical fermi arcs,

    Su-Yang Xu, Ilya Belopolski, Nasser Alidoust, Mad- hab Neupane, Guang Bian, Chenglong Zhang, Raman Sankar, Guoqing Chang, Zhujun Yuan, Chi-Cheng Lee, et al. , “Discovery of a weyl fermion semimetal and topo- logical fermi arcs,” Science 349, 613–617 (2015)

    2015

  16. [23]

    Discovery of a weyl fermion state with fermi arcs in niobium arsenide,

    Su-Yang Xu, Nasser Alidoust, Ilya Belopolski, Zhu- jun Yuan, Guang Bian, Tay-Rong Chang, Hao Zheng, Vladimir N Strocov, Daniel S Sanchez, Guoqing Chang, et al. , “Discovery of a weyl fermion state with fermi arcs in niobium arsenide,” Nature Physics 11, 748 (2015)

    2015

  17. [24]

    Exper- imental discovery of a topological weyl semimetal state in tap,

    Su-Yang Xu, Ilya Belopolski, Daniel S Sanchez, Cheng- long Zhang, Guoqing Chang, Cheng Guo, Guang Bian, Zhujun Yuan, Hong Lu, Tay-Rong Chang,et al., “Exper- imental discovery of a topological weyl semimetal state in tap,” Science advances 1, e1501092 (2015)

    2015

  18. [25]

    Observation of weyl nodes and fermi arcs in tantalum phosphide,

    Nan Xu, HM Weng, BQ Lv, Christian E Matt, Jih- wey Park, Federico Bisti, Vladimir N Strocov, Dariusz Gawryluk, Ekaterina Pomjakushina, Kazimierz Conder, et al. , “Observation of weyl nodes and fermi arcs in tantalum phosphide,” Nature communications 7, 11006 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    Experimental obser- vation of topological fermi arcs in type-ii weyl semimetal mote 2,

    Ke Deng, Guoliang Wan, Peng Deng, Kenan Zhang, Shi- jie Ding, Eryin Wang, Mingzhe Yan, Huaqing Huang, Hongyun Zhang, Zhilin Xu, et al. , “Experimental obser- vation of topological fermi arcs in type-ii weyl semimetal mote 2,” Nature Physics 12, 1105 (2016)

    2016

  20. [27]

    Weyl semimetal phase in the non-centrosymmetric com- pound taas,

    LX Yang, ZK Liu, Yan Sun, Han Peng, HF Yang, Teng Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yi Zhang, YF Guo, Marein Rahn,et al., “Weyl semimetal phase in the non-centrosymmetric com- pound taas,” Nature physics 11, 728 (2015)

    2015

  21. [28]

    Spec- troscopic evidence for a type ii weyl semimetallic state in mote 2,

    Lunan Huang, Timothy M McCormick, Masayuki Ochi, Zhiying Zhao, Michi-To Suzuki, Ryotaro Arita, Yun Wu, Daixiang Mou, Huibo Cao, Jiaqiang Yan, et al. , “Spec- troscopic evidence for a type ii weyl semimetallic state in mote 2,” Nature materials 15, 1155 (2016)

    2016

  22. [29]

    Fermi arcs and their topological character in the candidate type-ii weyl semimetal mote 2,

    Anna Tamai, QS Wu, Ir` ene Cucchi, Flavio Yair Bruno, Sara Ricc` o, TK Kim, M Hoesch, C´ eline Barreteau, En- rico Giannini, C´ eline Besnard, et al. , “Fermi arcs and their topological character in the candidate type-ii weyl semimetal mote 2,” Physical Review X 6, 031021 (2016)

    2016

  23. [30]

    Signature of type-ii weyl semimetal phase in mote 2,

    Juan Jiang, ZK Liu, Y Sun, HF Yang, CR Rajamathi, YP Qi, LX Yang, C Chen, H Peng, CC Hwang, et al. , “Signature of type-ii weyl semimetal phase in mote 2,” Nature communications 8, 13973 (2017)

    2017

  24. [31]

    Discovery of a new type of topological weyl fermion semimetal state in mo x w 1- x te 2,

    Ilya Belopolski, Daniel S Sanchez, Yukiaki Ishida, Xingchen Pan, Peng Yu, Su-Yang Xu, Guoqing Chang, Tay-Rong Chang, Hao Zheng, Nasser Alidoust, et al. , “Discovery of a new type of topological weyl fermion semimetal state in mo x w 1- x te 2,” Nature commu- nications 7, 13643 (2016)

    2016

  25. [32]

    Obser- vation of weyl nodes in taas,

    BQ Lv, N Xu, HM Weng, JZ Ma, P Richard, XC Huang, LX Zhao, GF Chen, CE Matt, F Bisti, et al. , “Obser- vation of weyl nodes in taas,” Nature Physics 11, 724 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Topo- logical negative refraction of surface acoustic waves in a weyl phononic crystal,

    Hailong He, Chunyin Qiu, Liping Ye, Xiangxi Cai, Xiying Fan, Manzhu Ke, Fan Zhang, and Zhengyou Liu, “Topo- logical negative refraction of surface acoustic waves in a weyl phononic crystal,” Nature 560, 61 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Symmetry- protected ideal weyl semimetal in hgte-class materials,

    Jiawei Ruan, Shao-Kai Jian, Hong Yao, Haijun Zhang, Shou-Cheng Zhang, and Dingyu Xing, “Symmetry- protected ideal weyl semimetal in hgte-class materials,” Nature communications 7, 11136 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Ideal weyl semimetals in the chalcopyrites cutlse2, agtlte2, autlte 2, and znpbas 2,

    Jiawei Ruan, Shao-Kai Jian, Dongqin Zhang, Hong 6 Yao, Haijun Zhang, Shou-Cheng Zhang, and Dingyu Xing, “Ideal weyl semimetals in the chalcopyrites cutlse2, agtlte2, autlte 2, and znpbas 2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 226801 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Specular andreev reflection in inversion- symmetric weyl semimetals,

    Wei Chen, Liang Jiang, R Shen, L Sheng, BG Wang, and DY Xing, “Specular andreev reflection in inversion- symmetric weyl semimetals,” EPL (Europhysics Letters) 103, 27006 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    The switch-off angle θ0 is given by θ0 = arctan v0√ 2k0d for the effective Hamiltonian Eq.(2)

  31. [39]

    For curved Fermi arcs and small θ, there exist reflection processes in addition to the negative refraction. Here, the reflection does not change vz, and we calculate ¯vz by ¯vz = ∫ k1 x −k0x dkx 2k0x vI z vII x +vII z vI x vIx+vIIx + ∫ k0 x k1x dkx 2k0x vI z, where k1 x = −k0 si...

  32. [40]

    Kwant: a software package for quantum transport,

    Christoph W Groth, Michael Wimmer, Anton R Akhmerov, and Xavier Waintal, “Kwant: a software package for quantum transport,” New Journal of Physics 16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Topological lifshitz transitions and fermi arc ma- nipulation in weyl semimetal nbas,

    HF Yang, LX Yang, ZK Liu, Y Sun, C Chen, H Peng, M Schmidt, D Prabhakaran, BA Bernevig, C Felser, et al. , “Topological lifshitz transitions and fermi arc ma- nipulation in weyl semimetal nbas,” Nature communica- tions 10, 1–7 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Fermi-arc di- versity on surface terminations of the magnetic weyl semimetal co3sn2s2,

    Noam Morali, Rajib Batabyal, Pranab Kumar Nag, Enke Liu, Qiunan Xu, Yan Sun, Binghai Yan, Claudia Felser, Nurit Avraham, and Haim Beidenkopf, “Fermi-arc di- versity on surface terminations of the magnetic weyl semimetal co3sn2s2,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00509 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Intrinsic magnetic topological insulators in van der waals layered mnbi2te4-family materials,

    Jiaheng Li, Yang Li, Shiqiao Du, Zun Wang, Bing-Lin Gu, Shou-Cheng Zhang, Ke He, Wenhui Duan, and Yong Xu, “Intrinsic magnetic topological insulators in van der waals layered mnbi2te4-family materials,” Science Ad- vances 5, eaaw5685 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Single pair of weyl fermions in the half-metallic semimetal EuCd 2As2,

    Lin-Lin Wang, Na Hyun Jo, Brinda Kuthanazhi, Yun Wu, Robert J. McQueeney, Adam Kaminski, and Paul C. Canfield, “Single pair of weyl fermions in the half-metallic semimetal EuCd 2As2,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 245147 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    An ideal weyl semimetal induced by magnetic exchange,

    J-R Soh, F de Juan, MG Vergniory, NBM Schr¨ oter, MC Rahn, DY Yan, M Bristow, PA Reiss, JN Blandy, YF Guo, et al. , “An ideal weyl semimetal induced by magnetic exchange,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10022 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.