Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Electron acceleration and thermalization at magnetotail separatrices

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that cold electron lobe populations are accelerated to 1–8 keV toward the X line at magnetotail separatrices, then thermalized by the electrostatic solitary waves they drive.

desk verdict Quantitative MMS evidence that separatrix potentials (1-8 kV) and ESW trapping thermalize reconnection electron beams, but the separatrix identification rests on outflow-edge location rather than direct diagnostics. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11138 v1 pith:CNHWCD3Q submitted 2019-08-29 physics.space-ph

C. Norgren , M. Hesse , P. Tenfjord , D. B. Graham , Yu. V. Khotyaintsev , A. Vaivads , K. Steinvall , Y. Xu
show 3 more authors
D. J. Gershman P.-A. Lindqvist J. L. Burch
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.space-ph
keywords magneticreconnectionmagnetotailseparatrixelectronaccelerationelectrostaticsolitarywavesthermalizationwave-particleinteractionfield-alignedbeams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using measurements from the four Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft in the magnetotail, this paper argues that reconnection separatrices—the magnetic boundaries of the exhaust—are sites where cold lobe electrons are accelerated toward the X line through parallel electric potential drops of about 1–8 keV. The accelerated beam then feeds electrostatic waves that grow into nonlinear electrostatic solitary waves with potentials large enough to trap the beam's electrons. The paper concludes that wave-particle interaction gradually converts the beam's directed drift energy into thermal energy, erasing the beam before it fully enters the exhaust. If correct, this closes a specific energy-conversion chain in reconnection: magnetic energy to parallel electron potential energy to beam drift to wave field to heat.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the trapping-velocity bound $v_{\rm tr} = v_{\rm ph} \pm \sqrt{2e\phi_{\rm max}/m_e}$, derived from the single-particle constant of motion $U = \tfrac{m_e}{2}(v-v_{\rm ph})^2 - e\phi$, where $\phi$ is the wave's electrostatic potential. This converts measured phase speeds and wave potentials into a velocity interval that separates trapped from passing electron trajectories, and the paper's central observation is that this interval brackets the accelerated beam—$|v_{\rm ph}| < |v_{\rm acc}| < |v_{\rm ph}+v_{\rm tr}|$—so the waves can capture and thermalize the beam. Two supporting tools are the Liouville peak-shift estimate of the acceleration potential $e\psi = m_e v_{\rm acc}^2/2$ and the unmagnetized electrostatic dispersion relation solved for the observed distributions to identify the instabilities generating the waves.

What would settle it

A crossing in which a distinct cold beam and electrostatic solitary waves are observed together but the measured wave phase speeds and potentials give a trapping range that misses the beam peak, i.e. $|v_{\rm ph}| < |v_{\rm acc}| < |v_{\rm ph}+v_{\rm tr}|$ fails, would refute the claim that the waves thermalize the beam through trapping; likewise, an acceleration channel with a clear outflow reversal on one side but no density cavity or beam would weaken the separatrix identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is observational: at the edges of the magnetotail reconnection outflow, the spacecraft crossed thin, low-density channels in which the electron distribution splits into a cold component near rest and a beam moving tailward, toward the X line. A Liouville-type estimate, taking the beam's peak phase-space-density speed as $e\psi = m_e v_{\rm acc}^2/2$, yields acceleration potentials $\psi = 1$–8 keV across five burst intervals, i.e. about 6–15 times the lobe electron temperature and 0.1–1.7 times the plasma-sheet thermal energy. Within the same channels, large-amplitude bipolar parallel electric fields are observed; four-spacecraft interferometry gives phase speeds proportional to the beam speed and wave potentials with mean about 1500 V, so the trapping range $v_{\rm ph} \pm \sqrt{2e\phi_{\rm max}/m_e}$ overlaps the beam. The paper concludes that the waves are not a by-product but the thermalization agent: they trap the beam, shift its phase-space peak to higher energies, and gradually turn directed drift energy into heat, explaining why the beam appears weaker closer to the plasma sheet.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that these thin channels sit on the reconnection separatrices; the paper infers this from their position at the outflow edge and their similarity to simulations, so if the channels are instead generic boundary-layer beams, the reconnection-specific interpretation of the acceleration and thermalization chain would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Lobe electrons can gain a substantial fraction of their eventual exhaust energy—1–8 keV, or 0.1 to 1.7 times the local plasma-sheet temperature—before crossing from the lobe into the reconnection exhaust proper.
  • The reported potential drops are lower bounds on the true parallel potential, because strongly thermalized beams were excluded from the estimate and observed ESW phase speeds sometimes exceed the measured beam peak speed.
  • Electrostatic solitary waves with phase speeds tied to the beam speed and potentials near 1.5 kV on average can trap the beam, so the waves convert directed drift energy into electron heat rather than merely accompanying the beam.
  • The same evolving distribution produces slow waves at moderate beam speeds via competing Buneman and electron-acoustic instabilities, then faster waves via an electron beam-mode instability with growth rates about ten times larger.
  • Acceleration potentials scale inversely with lobe electron beta, consistent with earlier Cluster events, so the amount of pre-acceleration at separatrices is ordered by how magnetized the lobe plasma is.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the paper's logic: if the inverse scaling between acceleration potential and lobe beta is not a selection effect, separatrix electron energies could be predicted from lobe density and temperature alone, giving a local closure for global reconnection models.
  • Because the observed ESW peak-to-peak lengths (mean about 57 km) are comparable to the estimated channel thickness (50–130 km), the waves may not be infinite plane waves; including their perpendicular structure could change the linear growth rates and is a natural next test.
  • If the channels are not true separatrices, the same acceleration and thermalization chain would still apply to any superthermal electron beam at a plasma boundary, so the mechanism could be tested independently in a non-reconnection current-sheet environment.
  • A practical extension would be to invert the trapping-range inequality in regions where the beam is already erased: measured wave speeds and potentials would then bound the energy of the beam that generated them, effectively using ESWs as a fossil diagnostic of past acceleration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports MMS observations of thin channels of accelerated electron beams at the edges of an earthward reconnection exhaust in the magnetotail. Using reduced electron distributions, the authors infer parallel acceleration potentials of 1–8 kV relative to the cold lobe population. Four-spacecraft interferometry of electrostatic solitary waves yields phase velocities and wave potentials, from which trapping velocities are computed; these trapping ranges cover a large part of the beam. The authors argue that the waves are generated by beam instabilities, transitioning from Buneman/electron-acoustic modes at moderate speeds to an electron beam-mode instability at higher speeds, and that the wave-particle interaction gradually thermalizes the beam, converting directed energy into thermal energy. A small statistical sample of similar channels is compared with previous Cluster results.

Significance. If the identifications hold, the paper provides a valuable observational link between separatrix electron acceleration, electrostatic solitary wave properties, and beam thermalization in the magnetotail, with quantitative trapping ranges and a plausible instability scenario. The strength of the paper is the internal consistency of the direct measurements: beam peak velocities, ESW phase velocities from four-spacecraft timing, wave potentials, and trapping velocities are measured rather than assumed. The authors also state several limitations explicitly, including non-conserved phase-space density, the exclusion of strongly thermalized beams, and the unknown distance to the X line. The honest caveats are a positive feature, but some of these caveats bear directly on the central claims and require a response in revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Figure 1] The identification of the acceleration channels as reconnection separatrices is load-bearing for the paper's title and conclusions, yet it is not directly established. The evidence given is (i) location at the edges of the earthward outflow, (ii) resemblance of reduced electron distributions to PIC separatrix simulations, and (iii) absence of outflow reversal near the channels, which the authors explicitly state gives no constraint on the distance to the X line. Because the same interval was previously interpreted as a flux rope by Huang et al. (2019), the 'edges of the outflow' could be flux-rope boundaries rather than separatrices. No direct separatrix diagnostic is reported, such as a boundary normal analysis, Hall-current topology, or field-line connectivity change. If the channels are not separatrices, the reconnection-specific framing of the acceleration potential, the comparison with Cluster separatrix statistics in Figure 3, and the conclusion about separatrix thermalization are not anchored. The authors should either supply such a diagnostic or reframe the paper's claims to generic magnetotail boundary-layer electron beams.
  2. [Section 4, Table 1, Figure 3] The Liouville-based estimate psi = m_e v_acc^2/(2e) is presented as the acceleration potential, but the paper itself states that f_lobe > f_acc, i.e., phase-space density is not conserved, and that wave-particle interaction can shift the beam peak to higher energies. Under these conditions v_acc is not a direct measurement of the parallel potential drop; it is a beam-energy proxy whose bias depends on the stage of thermalization. The later argument in Section 7 that the observed phase speeds provide a lower bound on the unthermalized beam speed is reasonable for the fast ESW group, but it is not applied consistently to the Table 1 values. The authors should present psi as a bracketed or effective quantity, for example by giving both v_acc-based and v_ph-based bounds, and should state how the exclusion of thermalized beams affects the statistics in Figure 3.
  3. [Section 6, Eq. 4, Figure 9] The instability analysis is a consistency test rather than a predictive test of the generation scenario. The input distributions are hand-fitted Maxwellians chosen from the same intervals in which the waves are observed, and the authors note that for the slow ESWs either the ion-electron or electron-electron mode can dominate depending on small input variations, while for the fast ESWs the growth-rate peak is shifted in k relative to the observed power. The agreement in real frequency therefore does not uniquely identify the instability, and the reported tenfold difference in growth rate is not compared quantitatively with the observed wave amplitudes or spectral power. A sensitivity study over the fitted parameters and a quantitative comparison of growth rates with observed wave power would be needed to support the specific instability interpretation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4] There is a duplicated and truncated passage: 'The beams had energies of 4-10 keV. of their events the spacecraft observed electron beams propagating inward towards the X line. They found that the beams had a higher occurrence frequency.' This appears to be an editing artifact and should be corrected.
  2. [Section 7] The sentence 'Here, however, we have here tracked the continuous change in the beam' contains a duplicated 'here'; the second occurrence should be removed.
  3. [Figure 3 caption and Table 1] For the last seven events in Table 1, T_sh is listed as underestimated, but the Figure 3 caption does not restate this. The caption should note that the comparison in panel (c) may be biased for those points.
  4. [Eq. 4] The notation Z' should be defined explicitly as the derivative of the plasma dispersion function with respect to its argument, to avoid confusion with the reduced distribution function notation used elsewhere in the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central measurements and wave-interaction analysis are self-contained, with only a minor consistency-test caveat in the instability section.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular. The acceleration potential ψ is obtained by a direct Liouville-type conversion of the measured beam speed, eψ = me v_acc^2/2, where v_acc is read from the observed reduced electron distribution; this is a measurement convention, not a quantity predicted from the same thermal parameters it is later compared with. The lobe and plasma-sheet temperatures used for comparison are independently selected intervals. The density-cavity relation and the acceleration-channel width estimate likewise use independent measurements (density, electric field, potential) and do not reduce to the input assumptions. The closest point to circularity is Section 6: hand-fitted Maxwellian electron distributions from the same event are inserted into Eq. 4, and the resulting dispersion solutions are overlaid on the observed wave power. This makes the agreement a consistency test rather than an independent prediction. However, the paper explicitly frames it as an investigation of whether the observed distributions 'can account for the generation of the ESWs,' and the linear dispersion calculation is not algebraically forced by the fitted drift speeds; notably, the computed growth peak for the faster waves is shifted in k relative to the observed power, showing that the test can fail. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citations. Hesse et al. (2018a) is cited alongside independent PIC simulations and is not the sole support for the separatrix identification. The alternative flux-rope interpretation of the same interval raises a scientific ambiguity about separatrix identification, but that is a correctness risk, not a circular derivation. Overall, the paper's claims rest on direct observations and standard kinetic calculations, so the circularity burden is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central observational claims rest on instrument measurements, with the main modeling assumption being that the beam peak maps to a potential drop via Liouville's theorem. The supporting instability analysis adds fitted Maxwellian distributions, an unmagnetized dispersion relation, and a Gaussian perpendicular potential profile. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Slow-beam electron distribution fit (blue, Fig 9a) = ne=[0.055,0.045] cm^-3, Te=[900,130] eV, vd=[0,17000] km/s
    Two-Maxwellian fit to the observed reduced electron distribution, used as input to the dispersion relation Eq. 4 for the slower ESW group. The values are manually adjusted and not unique.
  • Fast-beam electron distribution fit (purple, Fig 9a) = ne=[0.080,0.020] cm^-3, Te=[800,200] eV, vd=[0,35000] km/s
    Same fit procedure for the later, faster ESW group. The beam drift speed of 35000 km/s largely sets the phase speed of the beam-mode instability in Eq. 4.
  • Ion temperature for dispersion analysis = Ti=5 keV (v_ti=980 km/s)
    Chosen to represent lobe/plasma sheet ions. Authors state 10 keV would not change the result significantly, so this is a non-critical modeling choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A lobe population initially at rest is accelerated through a parallel potential drop, so the beam peak speed gives eψ = m_e v_acc^2/2.
    Section 4 Liouville approach. The paper itself notes f_lobe > f_acc, so phase-space density is not conserved and the mapping is approximate.
  • domain assumption The low-density electron channels at the exhaust edges are reconnection separatrices.
    Section 3. Inferred from channel location and resemblance to PIC simulations; no direct separatrix or X-line diagnostics are available.
  • domain assumption The unmagnetized, electrostatic linear dispersion relation (Eq. 4) with Maxwellian components describes the observed ESW generation.
    Section 6. Neglects magnetization, perpendicular wave structure, velocity shear, and nonlinearity; the authors acknowledge these limitations.
  • ad hoc to paper The perpendicular profile of the acceleration channel is Gaussian, ψ⊥(z)=ψ0 exp(-z^2/2l_z^2).
    Section 4.1 width estimate. The authors state 'the Gaussian shape is somewhat arbitrary' and that the exact shape cannot be determined.
  • standard math Bernstein-Greene-Kruskal trapping theory with conserved U=(m_e/2)(v-v_ph)^2 - eφ defines the interaction range via v_tr = v_ph ± sqrt(2eφ_max/m_e).
    Section 5. Standard BGK single-particle motion; used to assess which electrons interact with the ESWs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron acceleration and thermalization at magnetotail separatrices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CNHWCD3Q

@misc{pith2026190811138,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron acceleration and thermalization at magnetotail separatrices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CNHWCD3Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11138}
}
read the original abstract

In this study we use the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission to investigate the electron acceleration and thermalization occurring along the magnetic reconnection separatrices in the magnetotail. We find that initially cold electron lobe populations are accelerated towards the X line forming beams with energies up to a few keV's, corresponding to a substantial fraction of the electron thermal energy inside the exhaust. The accelerated electron populations are unstable to the formation of electrostatic waves which develop into nonlinear electrostatic solitary waves. The waves' amplitudes are large enough to interact efficiently with a large part of the electron population, including the electron beam. The wave-particle interaction gradually thermalizes the beam, transforming directed drift energy to thermal energy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11138 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of separatrix crossing. The blue and red shaded areas indicate the time intervals from which we extract lobe and plasma sheet parameters, respectively. (a) Energy spectrogram of electron differ￾ential energy flux. The black line shows the spacecraft potential, below which spacecraft photoelectrons are present. (b) Magnetic field. (c) Ion velocity. (d) Electron velocity. (e) Electron density. (f) Reduced ele… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Acceleration of electrons through a potential drop as seen from the reduced electron distribu￾tion. The intervals shows three acceleration channels, where the electron populations are succesively shifted towards higher energies. The thicker line follows a local maximum of the phase space density. The energy corresponding to the maximum velocity for each channel is taken as the acceleration potential ψ and is written… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Summary of acceleration potential for a few electron acceleration channels, compared to previous events observed by Cluster [Borg et al., 2012; Egedal et al., 2015]. Cluster results are adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The densities inside acceleration channels, n sep e , are always lower than the lobe densities n lb e . The gray line marks n lb e = n sep e . (b) The ratio of densities between the lobes and acceleration channels, n sep e /n lb e , show an inverse dependence on th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Estimation of acceleration channel thickness using data from MMS1. (a) Electron flow ve. (b) Perpendicular electric field E⊥,z at original sampling rate and downsampled to 3 Hz. E⊥,z reverses around the time where |ve | is the largest (marked by vertical dashed line). …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Interaction range of wave-field and electron population. (a) Reduced electron distribution. The thicker lines show the trapping range centered around the phase velocity (black dots). (b) Normalized power of Ek as a function of k k and f . The lines show the phase veloc…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Electrostatic potential and peak-to-peak length scales of ESWs. Since each spacecraft can pass along a different trajectory through the ESW, the four spacecraft can observe different lpp and φmax, re￾spectively. We therefore show the standard deviation centered on the …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Interaction range of wave field and electron population. (a), (c) Reduced electron distribution. The thicker lines show the trapping range centered around the phase velocity (*). (b), (d) Normalized power of Ek , as a function of k | | and f . The lines show the phase …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Wave instability analysis. (a) Observed and fitted model distribution during two time intervals corresponding to where the slower (blue) and faster (purple) ESWs are observed, respectively. (b) Observed dispersion relation and real ( fr ) and imaginary ( fi ) frequenci…
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In Table 1 and Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nakamura , I

    Asano , Y., R. Nakamura , I. Shinohara , M. Fujimoto , T. Takada , W. Baumjohann , C. J. Owen , A. N. Fazakerley , A. Runov , T. Nagai , E. A. Lucek , and H. R \`e Me (2008), Electron flat-top distributions around the magnetic reconnection region , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 113, A01207, doi:10.1029/2007JA012461

    work page doi:10.1029/2007ja012461 2008

  2. [2]

    Paschmann , and C

    Baumjohann , W., G. Paschmann , and C. A. Cattell (1989), Average plasma properties in the central plasma sheet , J. Geophys. Res., 94, 6597--6606, doi:10.1029/JA094iA06p06597

    work page doi:10.1029/ja094ia06p06597 1989

  3. [3]

    Bernstein , I. B., J. M. Greene , and M. D. Kruskal (1957), Exact Nonlinear Plasma Oscillations , Physical Review, 108, 546--550, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.546

    doi:10.1103/physrev.108.546 1957

  4. [4]

    Chen , K

    Bessho , N., L.-J. Chen , K. Germaschewski , and A. Bhattacharjee (2015), Electron acceleration by parallel and perpendicular electric fields during magnetic reconnection without guide field , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 120, 9355--9367, doi:10.1002/2015JA021548

    work page doi:10.1002/2015ja021548 2015

  5. [5]

    Borg , A. L., M. G. G. T. Taylor , and J. P. Eastwood (2012), Observations of magnetic flux ropes during magnetic reconnection in the Earth's magnetotail , Annales Geophysicae, 30, 761--773, doi:10.5194/angeo-30-761-2012

    work page doi:10.5194/angeo-30-761-2012 2012

  6. [6]

    Dombeck , J

    Cattell , C., J. Dombeck , J. Wygant , J. F. Drake , M. Swisdak , M. L. Goldstein , W. Keith , A. Fazakerley , M. Andr \'e , E. Lucek , and A. Balogh (2005), Cluster observations of electron holes in association with magnetotail reconnection and comparison to simulations , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 110, A01211, doi:10.1029/2004JA010519

    work page doi:10.1029/2004ja010519 2005

  7. [7]

    Che, H., J. F. Drake, M. Swisdak, and P. H. Yoon (2009), Nonlinear development of streaming instabilities in strongly magnetized plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 145,004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.145004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.145004 2009

  8. [8]

    Che , H., M. V. Goldman , and D. L. Newman (2011), Buneman instability in a magnetized current-carrying plasma with velocity shear , Physics of Plasmas, 18(5), 052,109, doi:10.1063/1.3590879

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3590879 2011

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Bhattacharjee , P

    Chen , L.-J., A. Bhattacharjee , P. A. Puhl-Quinn , H. Yang , N. Bessho , S. Imada , S. M \"u hlbachler , P. W. Daly , B. Lefebvre , Y. Khotyaintsev , A. Vaivads , A. Fazakerley , and E. Georgescu (2008), Observation of energetic electrons within magnetic islands , Nature Phys...

    2008 doi

  2. [10]

    Fujimoto, C

    Chen, Y., K. Fujimoto, C. Xiao, and H. Ji (2015), Plasma waves around separatrix in collisionless magnetic reconnection with weak guide field, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120(8), 6309--6319, doi:10.1002/2015JA021267

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Lapenta , S

    Divin , A., G. Lapenta , S. Markidis , D. L. Newman , and M. V. Goldman (2012), Numerical simulations of separatrix instabilities in collisionless magnetic reconnection , Physics of Plasmas, 19(4), 042,110, doi:10.1063/1.3698621

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    Drake , J. F., M. Swisdak , H. Che , and M. A. Shay (2006), Electron acceleration from contracting magnetic islands during reconnection , Nature, 443(7111), 553--556, doi:10.1038/nature05116

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    ieroset , W

    Egedal , J., M. ieroset , W. Fox , and R. P. Lin (2005), In Situ Discovery of an Electrostatic Potential, Trapping Electrons and Mediating Fast Reconnection in the Earth's Magnetotail , Physical Review Letters, 94(2), 025006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.025006

    2005 doi

  6. [14]

    Egedal , J., W. Fox , N. Katz , M. Porkolab , M. Ieroset , R. P. Lin , W. Daughton , and J. F. Drake (2008), Evidence and theory for trapped electrons in guide field magnetotail reconnection , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 113, A12207, doi:10.1029/2008JA013520

    2008 doi

  7. [15]

    Daughton , A

    Egedal , J., W. Daughton , A. Le , and A. L. Borg (2015), Double layer electric fields aiding the production of energetic flat-top distributions and superthermal electrons within magnetic reconnection exhausts , Physics of Plasmas, 22(10), 101208, doi:10.1063/1.4933055

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    Ergun , R. E., C. W. Carlson , J. P. McFadden , F. S. Mozer , L. Muschietti , I. Roth , and R. J. Strangeway (1998), Debye-Scale Plasma Structures Associated with Magnetic-Field-Aligned Electric Fields , Physical Review Letters, 81, 826--829, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.826

    1998 doi

  9. [17]

    Ergun , R. E., L. Andersson , J. Tao , V. Angelopoulos , J. Bonnell , J. P. McFadden , D. E. Larson , S. Eriksson , T. Johansson , C. M. Cully , D. N. Newman , M. V. Goldman , A. Roux , O. Lecontel , K.-H. Glassmeier , and W. Baumjohann (2009), Observations of Double Layers in...

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    Ergun , R. E., S. Tucker , J. Westfall , K. A. Goodrich , D. M. Malaspina , D. Summers , J. Wallace , M. Karlsson , J. Mack , N. Brennan , B. Pyke , P. Withnell , R. Torbert , J. Macri , D. Rau , I. Dors , J. Needell , P.-A. Lindqvist , G. Olsson , and C. M. Cully (2014), The ...

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Ergun , R. E., K. A. Goodrich , F. D. Wilder , N. Ahmadi , J. C. Holmes , S. Eriksson , J. E. Stawarz , R. Nakamura , K. J. Genestreti , M. Hesse , J. L. Burch , R. B. Torbert , T. D. Phan , S. J. Schwartz , J. P. Eastwood , R. J. Strangeway , O. Le Contel , C. T. Russell , M....

    2018

  12. [20]

    Vaivads, D

    Eriksson, E., A. Vaivads, D. B. Graham, A. Divin, Y. V. Khotyaintsev, E. Yordanova, M. AndrÈ, B. L. Giles, C. J. Pollock, C. T. Russell, O. L. Contel, R. B. Torbert, R. E. Ergun, P.-A. Lindqvist, and J. L. Burch (2018), Electron energization at a reconnecting magnetosheath cur...

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    (1949), On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation , Physical Review, 75, 1169--1174, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1169

    Fermi , E. (1949), On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation , Physical Review, 75, 1169--1174, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1169

    1949 doi

  14. [22]

    Franz , J. R., P. M. Kintner , C. E. Seyler , J. S. Pickett , and J. D. Scudder (2000), On the perpendicular scale of electron phase-space holes , Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 169, doi:10.1029/1999GL010733

    2000 doi

  15. [23]

    Fu , H. S., Y. V. Khotyaintsev , M. Andr \'e , and A. Vaivads (2011), Fermi and betatron acceleration of suprathermal electrons behind dipolarization fronts , Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L16104, doi:10.1029/2011GL048528

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    Fu, H. S., Y. Xu, A. Vaivads, and Y. V. Khotyaintsev (2019), Super-efficient electron acceleration by an isolated magnetic reconnection, The Astrophysical Journal, 870(2), L22, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aafa75

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    (2006), Time evolution of the electron diffusion region and the reconnection rate in fully kinetic and large system , Physics of Plasmas, 13(7), 072,904, doi:10.1063/1.2220534

    Fujimoto , K. (2006), Time evolution of the electron diffusion region and the reconnection rate in fully kinetic and large system , Physics of Plasmas, 13(7), 072,904, doi:10.1063/1.2220534

    2006 doi

  18. [26]

    (2014), Wave activities in separatrix regions of magnetic reconnection , Geophys

    Fujimoto , K. (2014), Wave activities in separatrix regions of magnetic reconnection , Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2721--2728, doi:10.1002/2014GL059893

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    Graham, D. B., Y. V. Khotyaintsev, A. Vaivads, and M. Andr \'e (2015), Electrostatic solitary waves with distinct speeds associated with asymmetric reconnection, Geophysical Research Letters, 42(2), 215--224, doi:10.1002/2014GL062538

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    Graham , D. B., Y. V. Khotyaintsev , A. Vaivads , and M. Andr \'e (2016), Electrostatic solitary waves and electrostatic waves at the magnetopause , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 121, 3069--3092, doi:10.1002/2015JA021527

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    Norgren, P

    Hesse, M., C. Norgren, P. Tenfjord, J. L. Burch, Y.-H. Liu, L.-J. Chen, N. Bessho, S. Wang, R. Nakamura, J. P. Eastwood, M. Hoshino, R. B. Torbert, and R. E. Ergun (2018 a ), On the role of separatrix instabilities in heating the reconnection outflow region, Physics of Plasmas...

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    Liu, L.-J

    Hesse, M., Y.-H. Liu, L.-J. Chen, N. Bessho, S. Wang, J. L. Burch, T. Moretto, C. Norgren, K. J. Genestreti, T. D. Phan, and P. Tenfjord (2018 b ), The physical foundation of the reconnection electric field, Physics of Plasmas, 25(3), 032,901, doi:10.1063/1.5021461

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    Mukai , T

    Hoshino , M., T. Mukai , T. Terasawa , and I. Shinohara (2001), Suprathermal electron acceleration in magnetic reconnection , J. Geophys. Res., 106, 25,979--25,998, doi:10.1029/2001JA900052

    2001 doi

  24. [32]

    Huang , C., Q. Lu , P. Wang , M. Wu , and S. Wang (2014), Characteristics of electron holes generated in the separatrix region during antiparallel magnetic reconnection , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 119, 6445--6454, doi:10.1002/2014JA019991

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    Huang , S. Y., A. Vaivads , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , M. Zhou , H. S. Fu , A. Retin \`o , X. H. Deng , M. Andr \'e , C. M. Cully , J. S. He , F. Sahraoui , Z. G. Yuan , and Y. Pang (2012), Electron acceleration in the reconnection diffusion region: Cluster observations , Geophys. R...

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    Huang , S. Y., K. Jiang , Z. G. Yuan , M. Zhou , F. Sahraoui , H. S. Fu , X. H. Deng , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , X. D. Yu , L. H. He , D. Deng , C. J. Pollock , R. B. Torbert , and J. L. Burch (2019), Observations of Flux Ropes With Strong Energy Dissipation in the Magnetotail , Ge...

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    Olsson , R

    Lindqvist , P.-A., G. Olsson , R. B. Torbert , B. King , M. Granoff , D. Rau , G. Needell , S. Turco , I. Dors , P. Beckman , J. Macri , C. Frost , J. Salwen , A. Eriksson , L. hl \'e n , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , J. Porter , K. Lappalainen , R. E. Ergun , W. Wermeer , and S. Tucke...

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    Huang , J

    Lu , Q., C. Huang , J. Xie , R. Wang , M. Wu , A. Vaivads , and S. Wang (2010), Features of separatrix regions in magnetic reconnection: Comparison of 2-D particle-in-cell simulations and Cluster observations , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 115(A11), A11208,...

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    Perraut , A

    Mottez , F., S. Perraut , A. Roux , and P. Louarn (1997), Coherent structures in the magnetotail triggered by counterstreaming electron beams , J. Geophys. Res., 102, 11,399--11,408, doi:10.1029/97JA00385

    1997 doi

  30. [38]

    Mozer, F. S., O. V. Agapitov, B. Giles, and I. Vasko (2018), Direct observation of electron distributions inside millisecond duration electron holes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 135,102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.135102

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    Roth , C

    Muschietti , L., I. Roth , C. W. Carlson , and R. E. Ergun (2000), Transverse Instability of Magnetized Electron Holes , Physical Review Letters, 85, 94, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.94

    2000 doi

  32. [40]

    Shinohara , M

    Nagai , T., I. Shinohara , M. Fujimoto , M. Hoshino , Y. Saito , S. Machida , and T. Mukai (2001), Geotail observations of the Hall current system: Evidence of magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail , J. Geophys. Res., 106, 25,929--25,950, doi:10.1029/2001JA900038

    2001 doi

  33. [41]

    Shinohara , M

    Nagai , T., I. Shinohara , M. Fujimoto , S. Machida , R. Nakamura , Y. Saito , and T. Mukai (2003), Structure of the Hall current system in the vicinity of the magnetic reconnection site , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 108, 1357, doi:10.1029/2003JA009900

    2003 doi

  34. [42]

    Andr \'e , D

    Norgren , C., M. Andr \'e , D. B. Graham , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , and A. Vaivads (2015), Slow electron holes in multicomponent plasmas , Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7264--7272, doi:10.1002/2015GL065390

    2015 doi

  35. [43]

    Northrop , T. G. (1963), Adiabatic Charged-Particle Motion , Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 1, 283--304, doi:10.1029/RG001i003p00283

    1963 doi

  36. [44]

    ieroset , M., T. D. Phan , M. Fujimoto , R. P. Lin , and R. P. Lepping (2001), In situ detection of collisionless reconnection in the Earth's magnetotail , Nature, 412, 414--417, doi:10.1038/35086520

    2001 doi

  37. [45]

    ieroset , M., R. P. Lin , T. D. Phan , D. E. Larson , and S. D. Bale (2002), Evidence for Electron Acceleration up to \ 300 keV in the Magnetic Reconnection Diffusion Region of Earth's Magnetotail , Physical Review Letters, 89(19), 195001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.195001

    2002 doi

  38. [46]

    Matsumoto , T

    Omura , Y., H. Matsumoto , T. Miyake , and H. Kojima (1996), Electron beam instabilities as generation mechanism of electrostatic solitary waves in the magnetotail , J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2685--2698, doi:10.1029/95JA03145

    1996 doi

  39. [47]

    Phan , T. D., M. A. Shay , J. T. Gosling , M. Fujimoto , J. F. Drake , G. Paschmann , M. Oieroset , J. P. Eastwood , and V. Angelopoulos (2013), Electron bulk heating in magnetic reconnection at Earth's magnetopause: Dependence on the inflow Alfv \'e n speed and magnetic shear...

    2013 doi

  40. [48]

    Moore , A

    Pollock , C., T. Moore , A. Jacques , J. Burch , U. Gliese , Y. Saito , T. Omoto , L. Avanov , A. Barrie , V. Coffey , J. Dorelli , D. Gershman , B. Giles , T. Rosnack , C. Salo , S. Yokota , M. Adrian , C. Aoustin , C. Auletti , S. Aung , V. Bigio , N. Cao , M. Chandler , D. ...

    2016

  41. [49]

    Pritchett , P. L. (2008), Energetic electron acceleration during multi-island coalescence , Physics of Plasmas, 15(10), 102105, doi:10.1063/1.2996321

    2008 doi

  42. [50]

    L., and F

    Pritchett , P. L., and F. V. Coroniti (2004), Three-dimensional collisionless magnetic reconnection in the presence of a guide field , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 109, A01220, doi:10.1029/2003JA009999

    2004 doi

  43. [51]

    Russell , C. T., B. J. Anderson , W. Baumjohann , K. R. Bromund , D. Dearborn , D. Fischer , G. Le , H. K. Leinweber , D. Leneman , W. Magnes , J. D. Means , M. B. Moldwin , R. Nakamura , D. Pierce , F. Plaschke , K. M. Rowe , J. A. Slavin , R. J. Strangeway , R. Torbert , C. ...

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    (1982), Kinetic Theory of Phase Space Vortices and Double Layers , Physica Scripta Volume T, 2A, 228--237, doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1982/T2A/030

    Schamel , H. (1982), Kinetic Theory of Phase Space Vortices and Double Layers , Physica Scripta Volume T, 2A, 228--237, doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1982/T2A/030

    1982 doi

  45. [53]

    Shay , M. A., J. F. Drake , B. N. Rogers , and R. E. Denton (2001), Alfv \'e nic collisionless magnetic reconnection and the Hall term , J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3759--3772, doi:10.1029/1999JA001007

    2001 doi

  46. [54]

    Hesse, C

    Tenfjord, P., M. Hesse, C. Norgren, S. F. Spinnangr, and H. Kolst (2019), The impact of oxygen on the reconnection rate, Geophysical Research Letters, 0(0), doi:10.1029/2019GL082175

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    Andr \'e , Y

    Toledo-Redondo , S., M. Andr \'e , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , B. Lavraud , A. Vaivads , D. B. Graham , W. Li , D. Perrone , S. Fuselier , and D. J. Gershman (2017), Energy budget and mechanisms of cold ion heating in asymmetric magnetic reconnection , Journal of Geophysical Research...

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    Torbert , R. B., J. L. Burch , T. D. Phan , M. Hesse , M. R. Argall , J. Shuster , R. E. Ergun , L. Alm , R. Nakamura , K. J. Genestreti , D. J. Gershman , W. R. Paterson , D. L. Turner , I. Cohen , B. L. Giles , C. J. Pollock , S. Wang , L. J. Chen , J. E. Stawarz , J. P. Eas...

    2018

  49. [57]

    A., and R

    Uzdensky , D. A., and R. M. Kulsrud (2006), Physical origin of the quadrupole out-of-plane magnetic field in Hall-magnetohydrodynamic reconnection , Physics of Plasmas, 13(6), 062,305--062,305, doi:10.1063/1.2209627

    2006 doi

  50. [58]

    Khotyaintsev , M

    Vaivads , A., Y. Khotyaintsev , M. Andr \'e , A. Retin \`o , S. C. Buchert , B. N. Rogers , P. D \'e cr \'e au , G. Paschmann , and T. D. Phan (2004), Structure of the Magnetic Reconnection Diffusion Region from Four-Spacecraft Observations , Physical Review Letters, 93(10), 1...

    2004 doi

  51. [59]

    Retin \`o , Y

    Vaivads , A., A. Retin \`o , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , and M. Andr \'e (2011), Suprathermal electron acceleration during reconnection onset in the magnetotail , Annales Geophysicae, 29, 1917--1925, doi:10.5194/angeo-29-1917-2011

    2011 doi

  52. [60]

    Viberg , H., Y. V. Khotyaintsev , A. Vaivads , M. Andr \'e , and J. S. Pickett (2013), Mapping HF waves in the reconnection diffusion region , Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1032--1037, doi:10.1002/grl.50227

    2013 doi

  53. [61]

    Nakamura , Q

    Wang , R., R. Nakamura , Q. Lu , A. Du , T. Zhang , W. Baumjohann , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , M. Volwerk , M. Andr \'e , M. Fujimoto , T. K. M. Nakamura , A. N. Fazakerley , J. Du , W. Teh , E. V. Panov , B. Zieger , Y. Pan , and S. Lu (2012), Asymmetry in the current sheet and sec...

    2012 doi

  54. [62]

    Wang , R., Q. Lu , Y. V. Khotyaintsev , M. Volwerk , A. Du , R. Nakamura , W. D. Gonzalez , X. Sun , W. Baumjohann , X. Li , T. Zhang , A. N. Fazakerley , C. Huang , and M. Wu (2014), Observation of double layer in the separatrix region during magnetic reconnection , Geophys. ...

    2014 doi

  55. [63]

    Wang, S., L.-J. Chen, N. Bessho, M. Hesse, J. Yoo, M. Yamada, Y.-Ä. Liu, D. J. Gershman, B. L. Giles, and T. E. Moore (2018), Energy conversion and partition in the asymmetric reconnection diffusion region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123(10), 8185--8205, d...

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.