Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 82 references

Twistor fishnets

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By lifting the double scaling limit of γ-deformed N=4 super-Yang-Mills to twistor space, the paper obtains an exact twistor action for conformal fishnet theory, whose abelian gauge symmetry makes scattering amplitudes manifestly…

desk verdict First twistor action for fishnet theory, with a solid construction but a hand-wavy double-scaling step that should be tightened. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11220 v3 pith:QNG2P42Y submitted 2019-08-29 hep-th

Tim Adamo , Sumer Jaitly This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords twistortheoryconformalfishnetgamma-deformedN=4super-Yang-MillsdoublescalinglimitcohomologicalscatteringamplitudesaxialgaugeintegrableCFTFeynmanrules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Conformal fishnet theory is a non-unitary, integrable scalar CFT that arises as a double scaling limit of γ-deformed N=4 super-Yang-Mills. This paper lifts that limit directly to twistor space: it defines a star-product deformation of the N=4 SYM twistor action, rescales the fermionic twistor coordinates and fields, and lets the gauge coupling go to zero while the deformation parameters go to infinity. The result is an exact twistor action for the fishnet theory, with free kinetic terms for two complex scalars and a single non-local quartic interaction. Although spacetime fishnet theory has no gauge symmetry, this twistor action is invariant under local abelian transformations, which allows an axial gauge fixing and a cohomological representation of scattering amplitudes in which conformal invariance is manifest. A sympathetic reader would care because the twistor description is exact rather than perturbative, giving well-defined amplitude formulae where N=4 SYM's twistor amplitudes are obstructed by IR divergences, and setting up a new route to the theory's integrability.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a twistorial version of the double scaling limit. The star-product (2.15) on the four anti-commuting twistor coordinates, with U(1)^3 charge assignments (2.14), deforms the N=4 SYM twistor action; under the simultaneous rescalings χ^a→√g χ^a and A→gA, followed by g→0 and γ_i→i∞ with ξ_i = g $e^{{-iγ_i/2}}$ fixed, only the cubic and quartic terms (3.8)–(3.10) survive. The resulting action (3.20) has a single non-local quartic vertex V_4 defined by elementary states δ̄^3(Z_i, Z(σ_i)) and the measure $d^{4}$A∧$d^{4}$B/vol GL(2,C), manifestly built from SL(4,C) invariants. The cohomological amplitude formalism represents external legs as $H^{{0,1}}$(PT,O(-2)⊗g) classes and amplitudes as compact-supported (0,2)-forms, paired through (4.4); the axial gauge propagator Δ(Z_1,Z_2)=δ̄^2_{-2,0,-2}(Z_1,Z_*,Z_2) is the Green's function for ∂̄ on twistor space. This machinery converts Feynman diagrams into products of four-twistor invariants, making conformal invariance manifest and identifying UV divergences with repeated invariants in denominators.

What would settle it

Evaluate the five-field term in the perturbative expansion of log det⋆(∂̄+gA)|_X using the charge assignments (2.14) and rescalings (3.1), and check whether the limit g→0, γ_i→i∞ with ξ_i fixed leaves any finite piece; the paper's claim predicts it vanishes identically.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the twistor action (3.20), obtained by gamma-deforming the N=4 SYM twistor action with the star-product (2.15) and then taking the double scaling limit g→0, γ_i→i∞ with ξ_i = g $e^{{-iγ_i/2}}$ fixed, is classically equivalent to conformal fishnet theory. The action consists of two kinetic terms φ†_i ∂̄ φ_i plus a single non-local quartic vertex built from four elementary-state insertions on a twistor line, integrated with a manifestly conformally invariant measure. Unlike the spacetime theory, the twistor action is invariant under the local abelian gauge transformations φ_i → φ_i + ∂̄α_i, and in Woodhouse harmonic gauge it reduces exactly to the spacetime FCFT action. Using an axial gauge propagator, the paper derives twistor Feynman rules and represents amplitudes as cohomology classes, showing that the UV divergences of FCFT appear as repeated SL(4,C) invariants in denominators, that the double trace counterterms restore conformality at the fixed point, and that half-track amplitudes are tree-level exact while four-point single-colour and snowflake amplitudes cancel their divergences order by order.

Load-bearing premise

The argument holds together if the double scaling limit on twistor space keeps exactly the cubic and quartic terms the paper writes down; if any higher-order interaction survived, the twistor fishnet action would be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The twistor Feynman rules give finite, well-defined cohomological amplitudes for FCFT, in contrast to N=4 SYM where IR divergences leave twistor amplitudes defined only at the integrand level.
  • UV divergences of FCFT are characterized on twistor space by repeated conformal invariants such as (1234)^2; the required double-trace counterterms are uniquely fixed by this structure and restore conformality at the fixed point α_1^2=α_+^2, α_2^2=ξ^2.
  • Half-track amplitudes A_n(1,n/2−1) are tree-level exact at the conformal fixed point, with kinematic factors expressed as products of pseudo-vertices V2 and V3 divided by SL(4,C) invariants, independent of the axial gauge twistor Z_*.
  • The four-point single-colour amplitude A_4(2,0) and the snowflake amplitude A_12(2,4) have loop corrections whose UV poles cancel at the fixed point; the paper exhibits the cancellation explicitly in twistor space through combinations of integrals F.
  • General fishnet diagrams have closed cohomological expressions: any fishnet diagram is a contour integral of a boundary factor B times propagator delta-functions, and for rectangular m×k fishnets the boundary factor is given explicitly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step suggested by this formalism is to look for Yangian charges acting directly on the cohomological amplitudes; since the twistor action is exact and manifestly conformal, the integrability of FCFT might be provable without solving any Feynman integrals.
  • The repeated-invariant criterion for UV divergences could be tested as a general diagnostic for other double-scaled deformations of N=4 SYM, for instance the generalized fishnet theories in other spacetime dimensions.
  • Because the axial gauge drops out of all on-shell quantities, the same amplitudes could be computed in an alternative twistor gauge (such as a CSW-like gauge) to provide a non-trivial check of the conformal fixed point values α_± and ξ^2.
  • The exactness of the twistor description raises the possibility of deriving the holographic fishchain from the twistor action itself, rather than from the spacetime theory, which might make the discretized string interpretation more direct.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs twistor-space actions for γ-deformed N=4 SYM, for the chiral field theory χFT, and for conformal fishnet theory (FCFT). Starting from the known twistor action of N=4 SYM, the authors implement the γ-deformation through a ⋆-product on the fermionic twistor coordinates and claim perturbative equivalence to the spacetime γ-deformed theory. They then implement the double scaling limit (3.6) directly on twistor space, obtaining the twistor action (3.20) for classical FCFT, which retains an abelian gauge symmetry that is absent in spacetime. The paper derives twistor Feynman rules in an axial gauge, identifies UV-divergent structures through repeated conformal invariants, adds double-trace counterterms at the conformal fixed point, and computes cohomological amplitudes for half-track, four-point single-colour, snowflake, and general fishnet diagrams. The central claim is that these cohomological formulae are exact, manifestly conformally invariant amplitudes of FCFT in the planar limit at the conformal fixed point.

Significance. If the construction is sound, this is a substantive contribution: it provides the first twistor formulation of FCFT, exhibits a purely twistorial abelian gauge symmetry that is absent in spacetime, and gives manifestly conformal, finite amplitude formulae for a theory that is often studied through spacetime Feynman integrals. The paper explicitly cross-checks several twistor results against known momentum/position-space integrals (e.g., equations (4.14), (4.39), (5.12), (5.26)), which is a real strength. The derivation of the γ-deformed twistor action and the Feynman rules is detailed, and the counterterm analysis in §4.3 is physically well motivated. The main risk is the under-proved truncation of the double scaling limit in §3.1, which is the foundation for all subsequent computations; this is a correctness issue that should be fixed rather than a reason to reject the manuscript outright.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, after Eq. (3.10)] The sentence "All higher-order terms in the expansion of Sγ2 are easily seen to vanish in the double-scaling limit" is load-bearing and is not justified in the manuscript. Under the rescalings (3.1)–(3.3), the n-th order term in logdet⋆(∂̄+gA) carries a factor g^{n−2}, the component fields in (3.2) carry powers g^1, g^{1/2}, g^0, g^{−1/2}, g^{−1}, and each ⋆-phase e^{−(i/2)mγ} must be traded for (ξ/g)^m using ξ = g e^{−iγ/2} from (3.6). The paper does not display the net g-exponent bookkeeping that excludes n≥5 contributions, nor does it check that the P1-integral identities that kill n>4 terms in the undeformed theory continue to apply before gauge fixing. Since the action (3.20), the quartic vertex (4.6), the identities (4.15), and every amplitude in §5 rely on this truncation, an explicit vanishing proof is required.
  2. [§4.3, paragraph beginning "At general loop order"] The claim that at any L-loop order the diagrams contributing to A4(2,0) will combine to cancel all UV divergences at the conformal fixed point is extrapolated from the one-loop result (5.8) and the two specific two-loop classes in §5.2. No inductive argument or general counting principle is given that would establish the cancellation for arbitrary L. The manuscript should either provide a proof of this all-loop statement or explicitly label it as a conjecture/observed pattern; as written, it goes beyond what is demonstrated and supports the paper's assertion that the twistor action with counterterms describes the conformal fixed point.
  3. [§2.2 and §3.1, Propositions 2.1 and 3.1] The proofs of both propositions are presented as "virtually equivalent" to previous work and delegate the non-trivial P1 integrals of Sγ2 to Refs. [39] and [75]. For Proposition 3.1 in particular, the reduction from the twistor action (3.11)–(3.13) to the spacetime χFT action (3.17)–(3.18) is sketched rather than shown, and the text does not demonstrate that the Woodhouse harmonic gauge reduction commutes with the double scaling limit. Given that the ⋆-phases and the field rescalings are essential to the limit, the proof should at least outline the intermediate steps that justify applying the gauge reduction after taking g→0 and γi→i∞.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.32)] The notation χj2χk2/2 and χj2χ4/2 is typographically ambiguous; explicit parentheses or spacing would make the Grassmann products easier to read.
  2. [§4.3, Eqs. (4.33)–(4.35)] The weights of the distributional forms are repeatedly said to be "implicit" or "deduced from projective homogeneity"; for reproducibility, the full weight assignments of ¯δ1, ¯δ2, and V2 in these intermediate expressions should be displayed.
  3. [§5.2, Eq. (5.10)] The notation ¯δ(12∗A) is used before the product (1234) is defined in (4.30); define the bracket notation for mixed index contractions earlier or right at (5.10).
  4. [§5.4, Eqs. (5.29)–(5.30)] The general fishnet formula is stated with the boundary contribution Brectm×k given without derivation. At least one worked example showing how the rules (5.27)–(5.28) assemble into (5.29) would substantially improve readability and verifiability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the twistor actions are derived from the standard N=4 twistor action and star-product deformation, and the double-scaling limit is implemented on twistor space rather than reverse-engineered from the fishnet result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained up to standard, externally established ingredients. The gamma-deformed twistor action is constructed from the known N=4 SYM twistor action by a star product whose charge assignments are imported from the literature, and Proposition 2.1 verifies the perturbative equivalence to spacetime gamma-deformed SYM by explicit gauge fixing and evaluation, rather than by assuming the target action. The double-scaling limit is then implemented on the gamma-deformed twistor action via the rescalings (3.1)-(3.3) and the limit (3.6), with the surviving terms (3.8)-(3.10) collected into the twistor action (3.11). One limitation is that the statement 'All higher-order terms in the expansion of S_gamma_2 are easily seen to vanish in the double-scaling limit' is asserted rather than demonstrated with the full g-counting; this is a completeness gap, not a circular reduction, because the paper does not define those terms in terms of the final fishnet action. The conformal fixed-point values (4.43) are imported from prior literature as external assumptions, and the paper's amplitudes are checked against known momentum-space integrals and known exact results, which is cross-validation rather than circularity. Self-citations to [46] and [67] for axial-gauge propagators and cohomological pairings are not load-bearing, since the needed propagator and pairing are re-derived in the text. No equation is found to be equivalent to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard twistor geometry (Penrose transform, Ward correspondence, harmonic gauge), the planar large-N limit, the absence of IR divergences imported from fishnet literature, and fixed-point values of double-trace couplings imported from prior beta-function computations. The most delicate input is the asserted survival of only selected terms in the double scaling limit.

free parameters (3)
  • ξ (effective fishnet coupling, ξ_3) = denoted ξ, the finite combination g e^{-iγ_3/2}
    Surviving quartic coupling in FCFT; all amplitude formulae are expanded in ξ.
  • α_1^2 at conformal fixed point = α_+^2 = iξ^2/2 - ξ^4/2 - i3ξ^6/4 + ... (series from [12])
    Double trace coupling fixed at the MS-bar conformal fixed point (4.42); used in the four-point and snowflake amplitude computations.
  • α_2^2 at conformal fixed point = ξ^2
    Double trace coupling fixed by exact beta function at the conformal fixed point (4.43); used in half-track and single-colour amplitudes.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Penrose transform and Ward correspondence
    Maps free massless fields to cohomology classes and self-dual connections to holomorphic bundles; used throughout to represent the twistor action and external states.
  • standard math Woodhouse harmonic gauge
    Partial gauge fixing used in Propositions 2.1 and 3.1 to reduce twistor gauge freedom to space-time gauge transformations; assumed to be non-degenerate.
  • domain assumption Euclidean reality conditions on twistor space
    The real slice R^{4|8} and quaternionic conjugation define the contour integrals; all computations are on this Euclidean slice.
  • domain assumption Planar large-N limit
    All amplitudes are computed in the planar limit N→∞ with SU(N) colour traces.
  • domain assumption Absence of IR divergences in FCFT
    Used to argue that the four-point vertex V4 is ∂bar-closed and amplitudes are finite; imported from prior fishnet literature.
  • domain assumption Conformal fixed point values of double-trace couplings
    Values α_2^2=ξ^2 and α_1^2=α_+^2 from (4.42) are taken from [11,12] and assumed to hold in the MS-bar scheme.
  • ad hoc to paper Only cubic and quartic terms survive the double scaling limit on twistor space
    The paper asserts without full derivation that only the O(A^3) and O(A^4) terms survive; this is load-bearing for the fishnet twistor action.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twistor fishnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QNG2P42Y

@misc{pith2026190811220,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twistor fishnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QNG2P42Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11220}
}
abstract

Four-dimensional conformal fishnet theory is an integrable scalar theory which arises as a double scaling limit of $\gamma$-deformed maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills. We give a perturbative reformulation of $\gamma$-deformed super-Yang-Mills theory in twistor space, and implement the double scaling limit to obtain a twistor description of conformal fishnet theory. The conformal fishnet theory retains an abelian gauge symmetry on twistor space which is absent in space-time, allowing us to obtain cohomological formulae for scattering amplitudes that manifest conformal invariance. We study various classes of scattering amplitudes in twistor space with this formalism.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    Boels, L

    R. Boels, L. J. Mason and D. Skinner, Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in Twistor Space , JHEP 02 (2007) 014, [ hep-th/0604040]

    arXiv 2007

  2. [75]

    Koster, Form factors and correlation functions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory from twistor space, Ph.D

    L. Koster, Form factors and correlation functions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory from twistor space, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt Universit¨ at, Berlin, 2017.1712.07566

    arXiv 2017

  3. [1]

    Beisert et al., Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview , Lett

    N. Beisert et al., Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview , Lett. Math. Phys. 99 (2012) 3–32, [ 1012.3982]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [2]

    Elvang and Y.-t

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes, 1308.1697

    arXiv

  5. [3]

    G¨ urdo˘ gan and V

    O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and V. Kazakov,New Integrable 4D Quantum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed PlanarN = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 201602, [1512.06704]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [4]

    R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler, Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory , Nucl. Phys. B447 (1995) 95–136, [ hep-th/9503121]

    arXiv 1995

  7. [5]

    Lunin and J

    O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena, Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals , JHEP 05 (2005) 033, [ hep-th/0502086]

    arXiv 2005

  8. [6]

    Frolov, Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background , JHEP 05 (2005) 069, [hep-th/0503201]

    S. Frolov, Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background , JHEP 05 (2005) 069, [hep-th/0503201]

    arXiv 2005

Show all 82 references
  1. [7]

    S. A. Frolov, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, Gauge-string duality for superconformal deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory , JHEP 07 (2005) 045, [ hep-th/0503192]

    2005 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Caetano, O

    J. Caetano, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and V. Kazakov,Chiral limit of N = 4 SYM and ABJM and integrable Feynman graphs, JHEP 03 (2018) 077, [ 1612.05895]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Kazakov, E

    V. Kazakov, E. Olivucci and M. Preti, Generalized fishnets and exact four-point correlators in chiral CFT 4, JHEP 06 (2019) 078, [ 1901.00011]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Fokken, C

    J. Fokken, C. Sieg and M. Wilhelm, Non-conformality of γi-deformed N = 4 SYM theory , J. Phys. A47 (2014) 455401, [ 1308.4420]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Sieg and M

    C. Sieg and M. Wilhelm, On a CFT limit of planar γi-deformedN = 4 SYM theory, Phys. Lett. B756 (2016) 118–120, [ 1602.05817]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Grabner, N

    D. Grabner, N. Gromov, V. Kazakov and G. Korchemsky, Stronglyγ-DeformedN = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory as an Integrable Conformal Field Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 111601, [ 1711.04786]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [13]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, ‘Fishing-net’ diagrams as a completely integrable system , Phys. Lett. 97B (1980) 63–66

    1980

  8. [14]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller and D.-l. Zhong, Yangian Symmetry for Bi-Scalar Loop Amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2018) 003, [ 1704.01967]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, G. Korchemsky, S. Negro and G. Sizov, Integrability of Conformal Fishnet Theory, JHEP 01 (2018) 095, [ 1706.04167]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller and D.-l. Zhong, Yangian Symmetry for Fishnet Feynman Graphs, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 121901, [ 1708.00007]. – 34 –

    2017 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Kazakov, Quantum Spectral Curve of γ-twistedN = 4 SYM theory and fishnet CFT , Rev

    V. Kazakov, Quantum Spectral Curve of γ-twistedN = 4 SYM theory and fishnet CFT , Rev. Math. Phys. 30 (2018) 1840010, [ 1802.02160]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov and G. Korchemsky, Exact Correlation Functions in Conformal Fishnet Theory, JHEP 08 (2019) 123, [ 1808.02688]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [19]

    G. P. Korchemsky, Exact scattering amplitudes in conformal fishnet theory , JHEP 08 (2019) 028, [1812.06997]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Basso, J

    B. Basso, J. Caetano and T. Fleury, Hexagons and Correlators in the Fishnet Theory , JHEP 11 (2019) 172, [ 1812.09794]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Dutta Chowdhury, P

    S. Dutta Chowdhury, P. Haldar and K. Sen, On the Regge limit of Fishnet correlators , JHEP 10 (2019) 249, [ 1908.01123]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Basso and D.-l

    B. Basso and D.-l. Zhong, Continuum limit of fishnet graphs and AdS sigma model , JHEP 01 (2019) 002, [ 1806.04105]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Gromov and A

    N. Gromov and A. Sever, The Holographic Fishchain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 081602, [1903.10508]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Gromov and A

    N. Gromov and A. Sever, Quantum fishchain in AdS 5, JHEP 10 (2019) 085, [ 1907.01001]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Gromov and A

    N. Gromov and A. Sever, The Holographic Dual of Strongly γ-deformed N=4 SYM Theory: Derivation, Generalization, Integrability and Discrete Reparametrization Symmetry , 1908.10379

    1908 arXiv

  20. [26]

    G. K. Karananas, V. Kazakov and M. Shaposhnikov, Spontaneous Conformal Symmetry Breaking in Fishnet CFT , 1908.04302

    1908 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Kazakov and E

    V. Kazakov and E. Olivucci, Biscalar Integrable Conformal Field Theories in Any Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 131601, [ 1801.09844]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Derkachov, V

    S. Derkachov, V. Kazakov and E. Olivucci, Basso-Dixon Correlators in Two-Dimensional Fishnet CFT, JHEP 04 (2019) 032, [ 1811.10623]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Pittelli and M

    A. Pittelli and M. Preti, Integrable fishnet from γ-deformedN = 2 quivers, Phys. Lett. B798 (2019) 134971, [ 1906.03680]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Basso and L

    B. Basso and L. J. Dixon, Gluing Ladder Feynman Diagrams into Fishnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 071601, [ 1705.03545]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [31]

    J. L. Bourjaily, Y.-H. He, A. J. Mcleod, M. Von Hippel and M. Wilhelm, Traintracks through Calabi-Yau Manifolds: Scattering Amplitudes beyond Elliptic Polylogarithms , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 071603, [ 1805.09326]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Penrose, Twistor algebra, J

    R. Penrose, Twistor algebra, J. Math. Phys. 8 (1967) 345

    1967

  27. [33]

    Penrose and M

    R. Penrose and M. A. H. MacCallum, Twistor theory: An Approach to the quantization of fields and space-time, Phys. Rept. 6 (1972) 241–316

    1972

  28. [34]

    R. S. Ward and R. O. Wells, Twistor geometry and field theory . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1991, 10.1017/CBO9780511524493

    1991 doi

  29. [35]

    Adamo, Lectures on twistor theory, PoS Modave2017 (2018) 003, [ 1712.02196]

    T. Adamo, Lectures on twistor theory, PoS Modave2017 (2018) 003, [ 1712.02196]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space , Commun

    E. Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space , Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 189–258, [ hep-th/0312171]

    2004 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Roiban, M

    R. Roiban, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, On the tree level S matrix of Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 026009, [ hep-th/0403190]. – 35 –

    2004 arXiv

  32. [38]

    L. J. Mason, Twistor actions for non-self-dual fields: A Derivation of twistor-string theory , JHEP 10 (2005) 009, [ hep-th/0507269]

    2005 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Adamo, M

    T. Adamo, M. Bullimore, L. Mason and D. Skinner, Scattering Amplitudes and Wilson Loops in Twistor Space, J. Phys. A44 (2011) 454008, [ 1104.2890]

    2011 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Sokatchev, An Action for N=4 supersymmetric selfdual Yang-Mills theory , Phys

    E. Sokatchev, An Action for N=4 supersymmetric selfdual Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 2062–2070, [ hep-th/9509099]

    1996 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Chicherin and E

    D. Chicherin and E. Sokatchev, Demystifying the twistor construction of composite operators inN = 4 super-Yang–Mills theory, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 205402, [ 1603.08478]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Cachazo, P

    F. Cachazo, P. Svrcek and E. Witten, MHV vertices and tree amplitudes in gauge theory , JHEP 09 (2004) 006, [ hep-th/0403047]

    2004 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Boels, L

    R. Boels, L. J. Mason and D. Skinner, From twistor actions to MHV diagrams , Phys. Lett. B648 (2007) 90–96, [ hep-th/0702035]

    2007 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Bullimore, L

    M. Bullimore, L. J. Mason and D. Skinner, MHV Diagrams in Momentum Twistor Space , JHEP 12 (2010) 032, [ 1009.1854]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Adamo and L

    T. Adamo and L. Mason, MHV diagrams in twistor space and the twistor action , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 065019, [ 1103.1352]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Chicherin, R

    D. Chicherin, R. Doobary, B. Eden, P. Heslop, G. P. Korchemsky, L. Mason et al., Correlation functions of the chiral stress-tensor multiplet in N = 4 SYM, JHEP 06 (2015) 198, [1412.8718]

    2015 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Chicherin and E

    D. Chicherin and E. Sokatchev, N = 4 super-Yang-Mills in LHC superspace part I: classical and quantum theory , JHEP 02 (2017) 062, [ 1601.06803]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Chicherin and E

    D. Chicherin and E. Sokatchev, N = 4 super-Yang-Mills in LHC superspace part II: non-chiral correlation functions of the stress-tensor multiplet , JHEP 03 (2017) 048, [1601.06804]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Koster, V

    L. Koster, V. Mitev, M. Staudacher and M. Wilhelm, Composite Operators in the Twistor Formulation of N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 011601, [1603.04471]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Koster, V

    L. Koster, V. Mitev, M. Staudacher and M. Wilhelm, All tree-level MHV form factors in N = 4 SYM from twistor space , JHEP 06 (2016) 162, [ 1604.00012]

    2016 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Chicherin and E

    D. Chicherin and E. Sokatchev, Composite operators and form factors in N = 4 SYM, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 275402, [ 1605.01386]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Koster, V

    L. Koster, V. Mitev, M. Staudacher and M. Wilhelm, On Form Factors and Correlation Functions in Twistor Space, JHEP 03 (2017) 131, [ 1611.08599]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Brandhuber, E

    A. Brandhuber, E. Hughes, R. Panerai, B. Spence and G. Travaglini, The connected prescription for form factors in twistor space , JHEP 11 (2016) 143, [ 1608.03277]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [55]

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner, Dual Superconformal Invariance, Momentum Twistors and Grassmannians, JHEP 11 (2009) 045, [ 0909.0250]

    2009 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Bullimore and D

    M. Bullimore and D. Skinner, Descent Equations for Superamplitudes , 1112.1056

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot and J. Trnka, The All-Loop – 36 – Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM , JHEP 01 (2011) 041, [1008.2958]

    2011 arXiv

  51. [58]

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner, The Complete Planar S-matrix of N=4 SYM as a Wilson Loop in Twistor Space, JHEP 12 (2010) 018, [ 1009.2225]

    2010 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Bullimore and D

    M. Bullimore and D. Skinner, Holomorphic Linking, Loop Equations and Scattering Amplitudes in Twistor Space , 1101.1329

    arXiv

  53. [60]

    Adamo, M

    T. Adamo, M. Bullimore, L. Mason and D. Skinner, A Proof of the Supersymmetric Correlation Function / Wilson Loop Correspondence , JHEP 08 (2011) 076, [ 1103.4119]

    2011 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Adamo, Correlation functions, null polygonal Wilson loops, and local operators , JHEP 12 (2011) 006, [ 1110.3925]

    T. Adamo, Correlation functions, null polygonal Wilson loops, and local operators , JHEP 12 (2011) 006, [ 1110.3925]

    2011 arXiv

  55. [62]

    L. J. Mason and M. Wolf, Twistor Actions for Self-Dual Supergravities , Commun. Math. Phys. 288 (2009) 97–123, [ 0706.1941]

    2009 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Adamo and L

    T. Adamo and L. Mason, Conformal and Einstein gravity from twistor actions , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 045014, [ 1307.5043]

    2014 arXiv

  57. [64]

    H¨ ahnel and T

    P. H¨ ahnel and T. McLoughlin,Conformal higher spin theory and twistor space actions , J. Phys. A50 (2017) 485401, [ 1604.08209]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Adamo, P

    T. Adamo, P. H¨ ahnel and T. McLoughlin,Conformal higher spin scattering amplitudes from twistor space, JHEP 04 (2017) 021, [ 1611.06200]

    2017 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Adamo, D

    T. Adamo, D. Skinner and J. Williams, Minitwistors and 3d Yang-Mills-Higgs theory , J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 122301, [ 1712.09604]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Adamo, Twistor actions for gauge theory and gravity , Ph.D

    T. Adamo, Twistor actions for gauge theory and gravity , Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford,

  61. [68]

    A. E. Lipstein and L. Mason, Fromd logs to dilogs the super Yang-Mills MHV amplitude revisited, JHEP 01 (2014) 169, [ 1307.1443]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Koster, V

    L. Koster, V. Mitev and M. Staudacher, A Twistorial Approach to Integrability in N = 4 SYM, Fortsch. Phys. 63 (2015) 142–147, [ 1410.6310]

    2015 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Penrose, Solutions of the zero-rest-mass equations , J

    R. Penrose, Solutions of the zero-rest-mass equations , J. Math. Phys. 10 (1969) 38–39

    1969

  64. [71]

    M. G. Eastwood, R. Penrose and R. O. Wells, Cohomology and Massless Fields , Commun. Math. Phys. 78 (1981) 305–351

    1981

  65. [72]

    R. S. Ward, On Selfdual gauge fields , Phys. Lett. A61 (1977) 81–82

    1977

  66. [73]

    N. M. J. Woodhouse, Real methods in twistor theory , Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985) 257–291

    1985

  67. [74]

    Chalmers and W

    G. Chalmers and W. Siegel, The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 7628–7633, [hep-th/9606061]

    1996 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Kulaxizi and K

    M. Kulaxizi and K. Zoubos, Marginal deformations of N=4 SYM from open/closed twistor strings, Nucl. Phys. B738 (2006) 317–349, [ hep-th/0410122]

    2006 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Gao and J.-B

    P. Gao and J.-B. Wu, (Non)-supersymmetric marginal deformations from twistor string theory, Nucl. Phys. B798 (2008) 184–197, [ hep-th/0611128]

    2008 arXiv

  70. [78]

    M. G. Eastwood and M. L. Ginsberg, Duality in twistor theory , Duke Math.J. 48 (1981) – 37 – 177–196

    1981

  71. [79]

    Brandhuber, B

    A. Brandhuber, B. J. Spence and G. Travaglini, One-loop gauge theory amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills from MHV vertices , Nucl. Phys. B706 (2005) 150–180, [ hep-th/0407214]

    2005 arXiv

  72. [80]

    I. Bena, Z. Bern, D. A. Kosower and R. Roiban, Loops in twistor space, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 106010, [ hep-th/0410054]

    2005 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Chicherin and E

    D. Chicherin and E. Sokatchev, Conformal anomaly of generalized form factors and finite loop integrals, JHEP 04 (2018) 082, [ 1709.03511]

    2018 arXiv

  74. [82]

    N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, An Approach to the evaluation of three and four point ladder diagrams, Phys. Lett. B298 (1993) 363–370. – 38 –

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.