Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Giant Orbital Magneto-electric effect and Current-driven Magnetization Switching in Twisted Bilayer Graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted graphene's magnetization can be switched by a tiny charge current through a giant orbital magnetoelectric effect.

desk verdict The magnetoelectric response calculation is solid and novel, but the switching derivation drops a quartic term that cancels the claimed linear coupling; the central claim fails as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11718 v4 pith:6VUHZ4LR submitted 2019-08-30 cond-mat.mes-hall

Wen-Yu He , David Goldhaber-Gordon , K. T. Law This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords twistedbilayergrapheneorbitalmagnetizationmagnetoelectriceffectBerrycurvaturecurrent-inducedswitchingquantumanomalousHallflatbandsmoirésuperlattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) is generally thought of as a non-magnetic conductor, yet recent experiments show that a tiny current of tens of nanoamperes can reverse the magnetization of the ferromagnetic state near 3/4 filling. This paper proposes a mechanism: the moiré twist plus alignment with a hexagonal boron nitride substrate reduces the crystal symmetry to $C_1$, so an in-plane charge current generates a net out-of-plane orbital magnetization through a magnetoelectric effect. Because the flat bands carry large Berry-curvature orbital moments, the effect is giant, and the current-induced magnetization couples linearly to the ferromagnetic order parameter. Using a continuum model with 0.1% strain and a 10 ps scattering time, the authors estimate a coercive field of about 113 V/m and a switching current of 57 nA, matching the observed 30–40 nA. If correct, this identifies an orbital, not spin-based, mechanism for ultralow-power magnetic switching in TBG.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the magnetoelectric susceptibility pseudotensor $\alpha_{ij}$ and the symmetry reduction that controls its allowed components. In isolated TBG the $D_6$ point group forces $\alpha$ to be diagonal, so an in-plane field produces only in-plane magnetization; the hBN substrate (sublattice potential $\Delta = 17$ meV plus uniaxial heterostrain $\epsilon = 0.1\%$) reduces the symmetry to $C_1$, making the out-of-plane components $\alpha_{zx}, \alpha_{zy}$ nonzero. The magnitude is set by the flat-band orbital magnetic moments $m^z_{s,\xi,\nu}(\mathbf{q})$ computed from the continuum model, with the linear-response formula $\alpha_{ij} = -\tau e/\hbar \int_{\mathbf{q}} \sum_{s,\xi,\nu} M_i v_j f'(E)$, where the scattering time $\tau = 10$ ps converts the response into a current-induced magnetization. Finally, the switching mechanism is carried by the Landau free energy $F = -a_0 M_z^2 + b_0 M_z^4 - M_z B_z$, into which the current-induced magnetization enters as a linear field-like term $-2 a_0 M_z \delta M_z$, giving a coercive field and a hysteresis loop controlled by the current direction.

What would settle it

Measure the polar Kerr rotation induced by a DC current in non-ferromagnetic hBN-aligned TBG at a general filling: the rotation must be linear in current, anisotropic with current direction, and vanish when the hBN is rotated away from alignment, directly probing $\alpha_{zx}$ and $\alpha_{zy}$ without complications from ferromagnetic domains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that TBG with a nearly aligned hBN substrate exhibits a giant orbital magnetoelectric effect: a charge current produces an out-of-plane orbital magnetization at any filling factor, even without ferromagnetism. The symmetry argument is that twisting reduces the isolated TBG point group to $D_6$, which forbids out-of-plane magnetization from an in-plane current, but the substrate's sublattice-breaking potential and heterostrain lower the symmetry to $C_1$, allowing components such as $\alpha_{zx}$ and $\alpha_{zy}$ to be nonzero. The large Berry curvature of the flat bands endows Bloch states with orbital magnetic moments of tens of Bohr magnetons, so the linear-response susceptibility $\alpha_{ij} = -\tau e/\hbar \int_{\mathbf{q}} M_i v_j f'(E)$ is enormous. Near 3/4 filling, when the system is not fully gapped and bulk conducting channels exist, the current-induced $\delta M_z = \alpha_{zx} E_x + \alpha_{zy} E_y$ enters the Landau free energy as $-2 a_0 M_z \delta M_z$, which tilts the double-well potential and switches the magnetization at $E_c \approx 113$ V/m, corresponding to $I_c \approx 57$ nA. The authors conclude that this matches the experimentally observed switching currents and explains the magnetoelectric switching mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The switching prediction assumes specific rigid interaction-induced band shifts at 3/4 filling and a finite 10 ps bulk scattering time; neither is derived from a microscopic interaction calculation, so if either is wrong the 57 nA estimate is not supported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Current-induced orbital magnetization should appear in any TBG sample with $C_1$ symmetry at a general filling factor, even in a non-ferromagnetic state, and should be detectable through the polar Kerr effect.
  • The switching current scales with the longitudinal resistance and the coercive field; for the parameters used, it is about 57 nA, within the experimental 30–40 nA range, so the magnetoelectric mechanism can explain the observed current-driven switching.
  • The mechanism does not apply to perfectly insulating quantum anomalous Hall edge-state transport; it requires bulk conducting channels with finite scattering time, as present in the non-quantized regime where switching is observed.
  • Increasing strain beyond the natural hBN-induced value increases the orbital moments and the magnetoelectric response, so artificially strained TBG could show even larger effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the magnetoelectric coupling is as large as calculated, the same linear coupling should allow current pulses to switch magnetization in other low-symmetry moiré systems with flat bands, such as twisted bilayer-bilayer graphene, without any spin-orbit torque.
  • The estimated 57 nA switching current depends on the as-yet-unfitted rigid band shifts at 3/4 filling; a full interaction calculation might produce different shifts and a different coercivity, so the quantitative match is a testable prediction rather than a derivation.
  • The same symmetry argument predicts a measurable current-induced Kerr rotation in non-ferromagnetic TBG at fractional fillings away from 3/4, which would isolate the orbital magnetoelectric effect from ferromagnetic hysteresis.
  • Because the effect is purely orbital and linear in current, it should show a characteristic anisotropy with current direction that would be absent for spin-based mechanisms, offering a clean experimental discriminator.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript argues that twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) aligned with hexagonal boron nitride and subject to strain has C1 symmetry, allowing an in-plane charge current to generate an out-of-plane orbital magnetization through a large magnetoelectric response. The authors calculate orbital magnetic moments in the flat bands, obtain the magnetoelectric susceptibility tensor within the relaxation-time approximation, and then propose a Landau free-energy mechanism by which the current-induced δMz couples to the ferromagnetic order parameter at 3/4 filling. They estimate a coercive field Ec ≈ 113 V/m and a switching current Ic ≈ 57 nA, which they claim matches experiments reporting 30–40 nA. The paper also predicts current-induced orbital magnetization at general fillings and discusses extensions to other moiré materials.

Significance. The symmetry classification and the linear-response calculation of the orbital magnetoelectric effect are valuable: the paper gives explicit symmetry tables (Table I), a concrete strained continuum model, and computes orbital magnetic moments up to tens of Bohr magnetons. The prediction that a small current can induce an out-of-plane orbital magnetization at general filling factors is falsifiable and does not rely on the switching model. However, the central switching claim rests on an invalid free-energy expansion, and the quantitative agreement with experiment depends on hand-set band shifts. If the expansion is corrected, the proposed linear coupling vanishes at the spontaneous minimum, so the paper does not establish a mechanism for current-driven switching.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.D, Eq. (12)] The expansion of F = -a0(Mz+δMz)^2 + b0(Mz+δMz)^4 retains only -2a0 Mz δMz and drops the term +4b0 Mz^3 δMz. At the zero-field minimum M0^2 = a0/(2b0), these two first-order terms are equal and opposite, so the linear coupling of a homogeneous current-induced δMz to the order parameter vanishes exactly. The derived coercive field Ec = 113 V/m and switching current Ic = 57 nA are therefore not supported by Eq. (12). A higher-order effect might survive, but it is neither derived nor used in the manuscript.
  2. [Section II.D, Eqs. (9)-(11)] The Landau coefficients a0 and b0 are fixed by the computed Mz and χzz, which in turn depend on the rigid band shifts {μ_{s,ξ}} = {-0.01, 2.4, 20, 22.4} meV. These shifts are introduced by hand and are not obtained from any interaction calculation or experimental constraint. Since the coercive field is essentially M0/(3√3 χzz), the quoted agreement with the 30–40 nA experimental current is a consistency check on chosen inputs, not a predictive test.
  3. [Section II.D and Section II.C] The magnetoelectric coefficient entering δMz is taken from the noninteracting-band calculation of Section II.C, but the switching calculation uses interaction-renormalized bands with spin and valley splittings. The manuscript does not demonstrate that α is unchanged in the ferromagnetic state; time-reversal symmetry breaking in that state could substantially modify the magnetoelectric response. The numerical values of Ec and Ic therefore also rely on an unexamined assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The notation Mz is used both for the Landau order parameter and for the total magnetization including δMz, which obscures the expansion in Eq. (12); distinct symbols would help.
  2. [Section II.C] The scattering time τ = 10 ps is taken from ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer graphene [49] and may not be representative of flat-band transport in TBG; the sensitivity of the magnetoelectric response to τ should be stated.
  3. [Supplementary Note 1] There are typographical errors in the supplementary material, including 'ε = 0.3$' instead of 'ε = 0.3%' and 'Poison's ratio' for 'Poisson's ratio'; these should be corrected.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract states that the twist-induced reduction of lattice symmetry allows a current to generate net orbital magnetization, but the body shows that D6 symmetry forbids the out-of-plane component, and strain and sublattice symmetry breaking are needed; the abstract should be more precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the magnetoelectric response is computed from an independent continuum model, the band shifts and scattering time are stated assumptions rather than fitted outputs, and the cited symmetry forms are parameter-free group theory.

full rationale

The paper's central quantity, the magnetoelectric susceptibility tensor, is computed from the continuum-model Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–4) via the linear-response formula in Eq. (8), with explicitly stated inputs: twist angle 1.2°, strain 0.1%, staggered potential 17 meV, and scattering time 10 ps. The orbital magnetic moments and Berry curvatures entering Eq. (8) are calculated from the band structure, not imposed from the target switching result. The switching analysis in Sec. II.D then introduces a standard Landau free energy F = -a0 Mz^2 + b0 Mz^4, with a0 and b0 obtained from Mz and chi_zz evaluated for a stated set of rigid band shifts {mu_s,xi} = {-0.01, 2.4, 20, 22.4} meV. The resulting coercive field and current, 113 V/m and 57 nA, are compared with the experimental 30–40 nA. This is a consistency check after the fact, not a prediction that is equal to its input by construction: neither the band shifts nor tau are fitted to the switching data, and the magnetoelectric response itself is not fitted to the experimental switching current. The paper does cite the authors' prior work [40,41] for the symmetry-allowed forms of the magnetoelectric pseudotensor, but that content is parameter-free point-group information with stated symmetry assumptions that do not already contain the TBG switching result, so under the review rules it is independent support and does not raise the circularity score. One genuine concern, noted for correctness rather than circularity, is that Eq. (12) expands b0(Mz + delta Mz)^4 and omits the +4b0 Mz^3 delta Mz term, which at the spontaneous minimum Mz^2 = a0/(2b0) exactly cancels the retained -2a0 Mz delta Mz linear term; this invalidates the claimed linear coupling and the derived coercive field, but an algebraic expansion error is not a self-referential reduction of the derivation to its inputs. No circular step satisfying the required definition is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claims are not parameter-free. The magnetoelectric response magnitude scales linearly with the assumed scattering time tau = 10 ps and with the strain epsilon = 0.1%, while the switching current depends on hand-chosen band shifts mu_s,xi. The continuum model and Landau theory are imported from prior literature. No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • uniaxial strain epsilon in bottom layer = 0.1% (0.2%, 0.3%, 0.5% in supplementary)
    Chosen to model hBN-induced heterostrain; no measured strain value is used from the experiments, and the calculated magnetoelectric response grows with epsilon.
  • scattering time tau = 10 ps
    Taken from graphene literature (Ref. 49); the induced magnetization and the magnetoelectric susceptibility scale linearly with tau.
  • spin/valley band shifts mu_s,xi = {-0.01, 2.4, 20, 22.4} meV
    Hand-chosen in Section II.D to realize a partially polarized 3/4 filling state; these shifts determine a0, b0, the coercive field and the predicted switching current.
  • staggered potential Delta = 17 meV
    Material parameter for hBN-aligned graphene taken from Refs. 45 and 46; not fitted here, but it is an input to the band structure.
  • strain angle phi = 0 (zigzag direction)
    Chosen for the numerical calculation; the authors argue the exact form of strain is not important for the symmetry-based conclusion.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Bistritzer-MacDonald continuum model with the 84x84 truncated Hamiltonian correctly describes the flat bands of TBG at theta = 1.2 degrees.
    Used throughout Section II.A and Methods IV.B; this is a standard model, but the paper does not benchmark the truncation or parameters against independent calculations.
  • domain assumption The linear-response formula Eq. (8) with a single relaxation time tau and an equilibrium Fermi-Dirac distribution describes the current-induced magnetization.
    Eq. (8) is adapted from Refs. 47 and 48; it assumes weak scattering and neglects the effect of the current on the distribution function and on the orbital moments.
  • ad hoc to paper The 3/4 filling ferromagnetic state can be represented by rigidly shifted noninteracting bands with the chosen mu_s,xi.
    Section II.D; no Hubbard or Hartree-Fock calculation is given, and the shifts are inputs rather than derived quantities.
  • domain assumption The spontaneous ferromagnet is described by the quartic Landau free energy Eq. (9) with a0 and b0 obtained from the continuum model via Eqs. (10) and (11).
    Standard phenomenological Landau theory, but its validity for the experimentally observed partially polarized state is assumed.
  • domain assumption At 3/4 filling in Refs. 37 and 38, the current flows through bulk conducting channels rather than only through chiral edge states.
    The authors rely on Rxx being finite and Rxy not quantized; stated in Section II.D and the Discussion, and they explicitly exclude edge-state-only transport.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Giant Orbital Magneto-electric effect and Current-driven Magnetization Switching in Twisted Bilayer Graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6VUHZ4LR

@misc{pith2026190811718,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Giant Orbital Magneto-electric effect and Current-driven Magnetization Switching in Twisted Bilayer Graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6VUHZ4LR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11718}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, signatures of quantum anomalous Hall states with spontaneous ferromagnetism were observed in twisted bilayer graphenes (TBGs) near 3/4 filling [1, 2]. Importantly, it was demon-strated that an extremely small current can switch the direction of the magnetization. This offers the prospect of realizing low energy dissipation magnetic memories. However, the mechanism of the current-driven magnetization switching is poorly understood as the charge currents in graphene layers are generally believed to be non-magnetic. In this work, we demonstrate that, in TBGs, the twist-induced reduction of lattice symmetry allows a charge current to generate net orbital magnetization at a general filling factor through magnetoelectric effects. Substrate-induced strain and sublattice symmetry breaking further reduce the symmetry such that an out-of-plane orbital magnetization can be generated. Due to the large non-trivial Berry phase of the flat bands, the orbital magnetization of a Bloch state can be as large as tens of Bohr magnetons and therefore a small current would be sufficient to generate a large orbital magnetization. We further demonstrate how the charge current with orbital magnetization can switch the magnetization of the quantum anomalous Hall state near 3/4 filling as observed in the experiments [1, 2].

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11718 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a. Both the K+ and K− points of the original Bril￾louin zone are mapped to the mini-Brillouin zone, giving rise to four-fold degenerate minbands with both valley and spin degeneracy. In the reciprocal space, the Moir´e superlattice has reciprocal vectors qb = 8π sin θ 2 3 √ 3d (0, −1), qtr = 8π sin θ 2 3 √ 3d  √ 3 2 , 1 2  , qtl = 8π sin θ 2 3 √ 3d  − √ 3 2 , 1 2  connect￾ing the three neighboring sites of the h… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Santos, J. M. B. L., Peres, N. M. R., & Neto, A. H. C. Graphene bilayer with a twist: electronic structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Santos, J. M. B. L., Peres, N. M. R., & Neto, A. H. C. Continuum model of the twisted graphene bilayer. Phys. Rev. B 86, 155449 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    H., Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene

    Bistritzer, R., & MacDonald, A. H., Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 12233 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    L., Luo, J

    Cao, Y., Fatemi, V., Demir, A., Fang., S., Tomarken, S. L., Luo, J. Y., Sanchez-Yamagishi, J. D., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Kaxiras, E., Ashoori, R. C., & Jarillo- Herrero, P. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene Ssperlattices. Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices

    Cao, Y., Fatemi, V., Fang, S., Watanable, K., Taniguchi, T., Kaxiras, E., & Jarillo-Herrero, P. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature (London) 556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Topological superconductivity in twisted multilayer graphene

    Xu, C., & Balents, L. Topological superconductivity in twisted multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 087001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    C., Zou, L., Vishwanath, A., & Senthil, T

    Po, H. C., Zou, L., Vishwanath, A., & Senthil, T. Origin of mott insulating behavior and superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031089 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Yuan, N. F. Q., & Fu, L. Model for the metal-insulator transition in graphene superlattices and beyond. Phys. Rev. B 98, 079901 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Koshino, M., Yuan, N. F. Q., Koretsune, T., Ochi, M., Kuroki, K., & Fu, L. Maximally localized wannier or- bitals and the extended Hubbard model for twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031087 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Isobe, H., Yuan, N. F. Q., & Fu, L. Unconventional superconductivity and density waves in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041041 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    C., Vishwanath, A., & Senthil, Band structure of twisted bilayer graphene: Emergent symme- tries, commensurate approximants, and Wannier obstruc- tions

    Zou, L., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A., & Senthil, Band structure of twisted bilayer graphene: Emergent symme- tries, commensurate approximants, and Wannier obstruc- tions. Phys. Rev. B 98, 085435 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Symmetry, Maximally localized wannier states, and low energy model for the twisted bi- layer graphene narrow bands

    Kang, J., & Vafek, O. Symmetry, Maximally localized wannier states, and low energy model for the twisted bi- layer graphene narrow bands. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031088 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    H., & Martin, I

    Wu, F., MacDonald, A. H., & Martin, I. Theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett 121, 257001 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Chi- ral spin density wave and d + id superconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene

    Liu, C.-C., Zhang, L.-D., Chen, W.-Q., & Yang, F. Chi- ral spin density wave and d + id superconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 217001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Y., Law, K

    Xu, X. Y., Law, K. T., & Lee, P. A. Kekul´ e valence bond order in an extended Hubbard model on the honey- comb lattice with possible applications to twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 98, 121406 (R) (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    J., & Vishwanath, A

    Tarnopolsky, G., Kruchkov, A. J., & Vishwanath, A. Ori- gin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Pseudo Landau level representa- tion of twisted bilayer graphene: Band topology and im- plications on the correlated insulating phase

    Liu, J., Liu, J., Dai, X. Pseudo Landau level representa- tion of twisted bilayer graphene: Band topology and im- plications on the correlated insulating phase. Phys. Rev. B 99, 155415 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Multiple topological transitions in twisted bilayer graphene near the first magic angle

    Hejazi, K., Liu, C., Shapourian, H., Chen, X., & Ba- lents, L. Multiple topological transitions in twisted bilayer graphene near the first magic angle. Phys. Rev. B 99, 035111 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Song, Z., Wang, Z., Shi, W., Li, G., Fang, C., & Bernevig, 8 B. A. All magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene are topological. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 036401 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Lian, B., Wang, Z., & Bernevig, B. A. Twisted bilayer graphene: A phonon-driven superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257002 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Kohn-luttinger superconduc- tivity in twisted bilayer graphene

    Gonzalez, J., & Stauber, T. Kohn-luttinger superconduc- tivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 026801 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Strong coupling phases of partially filled twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands

    Kang, J., & Vafek, O. Strong coupling phases of partially filled twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 246401 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    N., Uchoa, B

    Seo, K., Kotov, V. N., Uchoa, B. Ferromagnetic mott state in twisted graphene bilayers at the magic angle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 246402 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Xie, M., & MacDonald, A. H. On the nature of the corre- lated insulator states in twisted bilayer graphene. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04213

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bultinck, N., Chatterjee, & Zaletel, M. P. Anomalous Hall ferromagnetism in twisted bilayer graphene. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.08110

    1901 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Herrero, P.-J., & Senthil, T

    Zhang, Y.-H., Mao, D., Cao, Y. Herrero, P.-J., & Senthil, T. Nearly flat Chern bands in moir´ e superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 99, 075127 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anoma- lous Hall effect and a lattice model

    Zhang, Y.-H., Mao, D., & Senthil, T. Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anoma- lous Hall effect and a lattice model. Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033126

  20. [28]

    Zhang, Y.-H., & Senthil, T., Bridging Hubbard model physics and quantum Hall physics in trilayer graphene/h- BN moir´ e superlattice.Phys. Rev. B , 99, 205150 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Z. Bi, N. F. Q. Yuan, L. Fu, Designing flat band by strain. Phys. Rev. B , 100, 035448 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    F., & Dean, C

    Yankowitz, M., Chen, S., Polshyn, H., Zhang, Y., Watan- abe, K., Taniguchi, T., Graf, D., Young, A. F., & Dean, C. R. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Sicence 363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Jiang, Y., Mao, J., Lai, X., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Haule, K., Andrei, E. Y. Charge-order and broken rota- tional symmetry in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 573, 91-95 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    A., Das, I., Urgell, C., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Zhang, G., Bachtold, A., MacDonald, A

    Lu, X., Stepanov, P., Yang, W., Xie, M., Aamir, M. A., Das, I., Urgell, C., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Zhang, G., Bachtold, A., MacDonald, A. H., & Efetov, D. K., Superconductors, orbital magnets, and correlated states in magic angle bilayer graphene.Nature 574, 653-657 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    v., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Perge, S

    Choi, Y., Kemmer, J., Peng, Y., Thomson, A., Arora, H., Poiski, R., Zhang, Y., Ren, H., Alicea, J., Rafel, G., Oppen, F. v., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Perge, S. N. Imaging electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle. Nat. Phys. 15, 1174-1190 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    M., Xian, L., Yankowitz, M., Chen, S., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Hone, J., Dean, C., Rubio, A., Pasupathy, A

    Kerelsky, A., McGilly, L., Kennes, D. M., Xian, L., Yankowitz, M., Chen, S., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Hone, J., Dean, C., Rubio, A., Pasupathy, A. N. Magic angle spectroscopy. Nature 572, 95-100 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    L., Fox, E

    Chen, G., Sharpe, A. L., Fox, E. J., Zhang, Y.-H., Wang, S., Jiang, L., Lyu, B., Li, H., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Shi, Z., Senthil, T., Goldhaber-Gordon, D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, F., Tunable correlated chern insulator and fer- romagnetism in trilayer graphene/boron nitride M...

    1905 arXiv

  28. [36]

    A., Yazdani, A

    Xie, Y., Lian, B., Jack, B., Liu, X., Chiu, C.-L., Watan- abe, K., Taniguchi, T., Bernevig, B. A., Yazdani, A. Spec- troscopic signatures of many-body correlations in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature, 572, 101-105 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    L., Barnard, A

    Sharpe, A. L., Barnard, A. W., Finney, J., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Kastner, M. A., & Goldhaber-Gordon, D. Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 365, 605-608 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    L., Polshyn, H., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Balents, L., & Young, A

    Serlin, M., Tschirhat, C. L., Polshyn, H., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Balents, L., & Young, A. F. Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moir´ e heterostructure. Science, aay5533 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    et al., Field-free switching of perpendicu- lar magnetization through spinorbit torque in antiferro- magnet/ferromagnet/oxide structures

    Oh, Y-W. et al., Field-free switching of perpendicu- lar magnetization through spinorbit torque in antiferro- magnet/ferromagnet/oxide structures. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 878-884 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    He, W.-Y., & Law, K. T. Novel magnetoelec- tric effects in gyrotropic superconductors and a case study of transition metal dichalcodenides. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02514

    1902 arXiv

  33. [41]

    He,W.-Y., & Law, K. T. Kramers Weyl semimet- als as quantum solenoids and their applica- tions in spin-orbit torque devices. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.12575

    1905 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Neto, A. H. C., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    M., Neto, A

    Pereira, V. M., Neto, A. H. C., & Peres, N. M. R. Tight- binding approach to uniaxial strain in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 80, 045401 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    I., & Geim, A

    Guinea, F., Katsnelson, M. I., & Geim, A. K. Energy gaps and a zero-field quantum Hall effect in graphene by strain engineering. Nat. Phys. 6, 30 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Lee, M. et al. Ballistic miniband conduction in a graphene superlattice. Science 353, 1526-1529 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    L., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., MacDonald, A

    Kim, H., Leconte, N., Chittari, B. L., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., MacDonald, A. H., Jung, J., & Jung, S. Accurate gap determination in monolayer and bilayer graphene/h-BN Moir´ e superlattices,Nano Lett. 18, 7732 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    E., & Souza, I

    Zhong, S., Moore, J. E., & Souza, I. Gyrotropic mag- netic effect and the magnetic moment on the Fermi sur- face, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 077201 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Ma, J., & Pesin, D. A. Chiral magnetic effect and natural optical activity in metals with or without Weyl points, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235205 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    J., Lom- bardo, A., Milana, S., Nair, R

    Brida, D., Tomadin, A., Manzoni, C., Kim, Y. J., Lom- bardo, A., Milana, S., Nair, R. R., Novoselov, K. S., Fer- rari, A. C., Cerullo, G., & Polini, M. Ultrafast collinear scattering and carrier multiplication in graphene, Nat. Commun. 4, 1987 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Theoretical aspects of the Edelstein effects for anisotropic two-dimensional electron gas and topological insulators, Phys

    Johansson, A., Henk, J., & Mertig, I. Theoretical aspects of the Edelstein effects for anisotropic two-dimensional electron gas and topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 93, 195440 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Edelstein effect in Weyl semimetals, Phys

    Johansson, A., Henk, J., & Mertig, I. Edelstein effect in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 085417 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    F., & Shan, J

    Lee, J., Wang, Z., Xie, H., Mak, K. F., & Shan, J. Valley magnetoelectricity in single-layer MoS 2. Nat. Mater. 16, 887-891 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Y., Watan- abe, K., Taniguchi, T., Vishwanath, A., & Kim, P

    Liu, X., Hao, Z., Khalaf, E., Lee, J. Y., Watan- abe, K., Taniguchi, T., Vishwanath, A., & Kim, P. Spin-polarized correlated insulator and superconduc- tor in twisted double bilayer graphene. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08130

    1903 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Y., Shi, D., & Zhang, G

    Shen, C., Li, N., Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Tang, J., Liu, J., Tian, J., Chu, Y., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., 9 Yang, R., Meng, Z. Y., Shi, D., & Zhang, G. Observa- tion of superconductivity with Tc onset at 12K in electri- cally tunable twisted double bilayer graphene. Preprint at...

    1903 arXiv

  47. [55]

    M., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., & Jarillo-Herrero, P

    Cao, Y., Rodan-Legrain, D., Rubles-Bigorda, O., Park, J. M., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., & Jarillo-Herrero, P. Electric field tunable correlated states and magnetic phase transitions in twisted bilayer-bilayer graphene. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08596

    1903 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Riberiro-Palau, R., Zhang, C., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Hone, J., & Dean, C. R. Twistable electronics with dynamically rotatable heterostructures. Science, 361, 690- 693

  49. [57]

    R., Yankowitz, M., Muraleetharan, L., Watan- abe, K., Taniguchi, T., Dean, C

    Finney, N. R., Yankowitz, M., Muraleetharan, L., Watan- abe, K., Taniguchi, T., Dean, C. R., & Hone, J. Tunable crystal symmetry in graphene-boron nitride heterostruc- tures with coexisting moir superlattices. Nat. Nanotech. 14, 1029-1034 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Louie, S

    Liu, K., Zhang, L., Cao, T., Jin, C., Qiu, D., Zhou, Q., Zettl, A., Yang, P. Louie, S. G., Wang, F. Evolution of interlayer coupling in twisted molybdenum disulfide bi- layers. Nat. Commun. 5, 4966 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    Polar Kerr effect and time reversal symmetry breaking in bilayer graphene

    Nandkishore, R., & Levitov, L. Polar Kerr effect and time reversal symmetry breaking in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 097402 (2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    S., Nazarov, Y

    Levitov, L. S., Nazarov, Y. V., Eliashberg, G. M. Mag- netoelectric effects in conductors with mirror isomer sym- metry. JETP 61, 133 (1985)

    1985

  53. [61]

    Edelstein, V. M. Spin polarization of conduction elec- trons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asym- metric electron systems. Solid State Commun. 73, 233 (1990). 1 Supplementary Material: Giant Orbital Magnetoelectric effect and Current-induced Magnetization Switch...

    1990

  54. [62]

    J. M. B. L. dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. C. Neto, Graphene Bilayer with a Twist: Electronic Structure , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007)

    2007

  55. [63]

    J. M. B. L. dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. C. Neto, Continuum Model of the Twisted Graphene Bilayer , Phys. Rev. B 86, 155449 (2012)

    2012

  56. [64]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.