Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Ultralocal Lax connection for para-complex $\mathbb{Z}_T$-cosets

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For classical sigma-models on para-complex $Z_T$-cosets, there exists a gauge-invariant Lax connection whose Poisson brackets are ultralocal and whose light-cone components commute, making the monodromy obey a classical Yangian Poisson…

desk verdict A clean, new ultralocal Lax construction for para-complex Z_T-cosets; the main Poisson-bracket result is convincing, but Section 4.1 skips the canonical derivation that everything rests on. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00742 v1 pith:VA3VLEAM submitted 2019-09-02 hep-th

Francois Delduc , Takashi Kameyama , Sylvain Lacroix , Marc Magro , Benoit Vicedo This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords para-complexgeometryZ_T-cosetsultralocalPoissonbracketsLaxconnectionintegrablesigma-modelsclassicalYangianquantuminversescatteringgaugeinvariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that classical integrable $\sigma$-models on para-complex $\mathbb{Z}_T$-cosets admit a gauge-invariant Lax connection whose Poisson brackets contain no derivative-of-delta terms, and whose two light-cone components Poisson-commute with each other. This matters because non-ultralocality has blocked the standard quantum inverse scattering method for integrable field theories for decades; ultralocality removes the ambiguity in defining lattice discretisations and monodromy Poisson brackets. The result extends an ultralocality theorem previously known only for hermitian symmetric spaces to the para-complex $\mathbb{Z}_T$ family, including non-symmetric examples when $T>2$. If correct, the monodromy matrix obeys a classical Yangian Poisson algebra, giving a concrete starting point for quantisation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of projectors $P_<$ and $P_>$ that decompose the Lie algebra according to the $\mathbb{Z}$-gradation coming from the distinguished element $u$; the para-complex structure is $J=P_<-P_>$. The simplification of the action to $S=KT\int \kappa(j^<_+, j^>_-)$ is what makes the conserved current depend only on the fields $g$ and $X$ with no spatial derivatives, and that derivative-free dependence is exactly what forces ultralocality. A formal gauge transformation $U(z)=g\alpha(z)^{-1}$ with $\alpha(z)=\exp(u\ln z)$ links this new Lax connection to the standard $\mathbb{Z}_T$-coset Lax connection, so flatness and the conserved charges are preserved. The classical Yangian algebra of the monodromy then follows from the rational $r$-matrix structure $C_{12}/(\mu-\lambda)$ in Eq. (4.7).

What would settle it

Carry out the full constrained Hamiltonian analysis of the action (3.5) for a concrete para-complex $\mathbb{Z}_T$-coset with $T=3$, such as $SL(3)/(S(GL(1)\times GL(1)\times GL(1)))$, keeping all constraints explicit. If the Poisson brackets of the currents $K_\pm$ acquire any term proportional to $\delta'(x-x')$, or if $\{K_+(x),K_-(x')\}$ fails to vanish strongly, the paper's central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a $\sigma$-model on a para-complex $\mathbb{Z}_T$-coset $G/H$, built from a split real form Lie algebra with a $\mathbb{Z}_T$-grading induced by an element $u$ of the Lie algebra, the action can be simplified by a total-derivative term to $S = KT \int \kappa(j^<_+, j^>_-)\,dx^+ dx^-$. The conserved current obtained from the global symmetry is then flat and gauge invariant: $K_+ = -2g j^<_+ g^{-1}$ and $K_- = -2g j^>_- g^{-1}$, and the Lax connection is $L_\pm(\lambda)=K_\pm/(1\mp\lambda)$. In the Hamiltonian formulation the current is expressed without spatial derivatives as $K_+ = -\frac{4}{KT} g X_{<} g^{-1}$ and $K_- = -\frac{4}{KT} g X_{>} g^{-1}$, using the momentum field $X$ and the first-class constraint $X^{[0]}=0$. From this the paper computes the ultralocal Poisson brackets $\{K_+(x),K_-(x')\}=0$ and $\{K_\pm(x),K_\pm(x')\}=-\frac{4}{KT}[C_{12},K_\pm(x)]\delta(x-x')$, which imply the Lax brackets of Eq. (4.7). Because the Lax matrix is ultralocal, the monodromy has a well-defined Poisson bracket taking the classical Yangian form.

Load-bearing premise

The weakest point is the canonical analysis of the simplified action (3.5), whose result $X=\frac{KT}{2}(j^>_-+j^<_+)$ and first-class constraint $X^{[0]}=0$ is stated without derivation; if those phase-space relations miss degrees of freedom or the constraint is not first-class, the Poisson-bracket computation that establishes ultralocality collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The path-ordered exponential of the new Lax matrix is free of the $\delta'$-term ambiguity that plagues non-ultralocal models, so its Poisson bracket is well defined both on the circle and on the line.
  • The monodromy satisfies the classical Yangian Poisson algebra $\{T_1(\lambda),T_2(\mu)\}=\frac{2}{KT}[C_{12}/(\mu-\lambda),T_1T_2]$, giving an infinite tower of integrals of motion in involution after expansion.
  • Since the Lax connection is gauge invariant, the ultralocal bracket survives gauge fixing without corrections from the constrained bracket for gauge-invariant quantities.
  • The new Lax connection is related to the standard $\mathbb{Z}_T$-coset Lax connection by a spectral-parameter-dependent formal gauge transformation, so it describes the same integrable structure.
  • For these models, the lattice discretisation required by the quantum inverse scattering method can be constructed from the continuum Lax matrix, opening a concrete quantisation route.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If ultralocality holds, the lattice regularisation of these models should produce the rational $R$-matrix of the Yangian with a coupling set by $KT/4$; this is a testable prediction the paper does not spell out.
  • The construction is expected to survive one-parameter integrable deformations that preserve the para-complex grading, by analogy with known deformations of the O(3) model; the paper raises this only as a question.
  • A recent four-dimensional gauge-theory construction of integrable models with order defects may provide a structural explanation of why this class is ultralocal; the paper notes the connection but does not establish it.
  • For $T=2$, the result covers split-real analogues of hermitian symmetric spaces and may bypass the reality-condition obstruction that excludes compact complex targets; the paper mentions the obstruction but not this implication.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an ultralocal Lax connection for classical sigma-models on para-complex Z_T-cosets, which are analogues of the complex homogeneous target spaces studied by Bykov. Starting from the standard Z_T-coset action, the authors rewrite it using the Z-gradation and add a total derivative to obtain the simplified action (3.5). From this action they derive a conserved, gauge-invariant, and flat current K_± given in Eq. (3.6), and define a Zakharov-Mikhailov type Lax connection L_±(λ) = K_±/(1∓λ). This Lax connection is shown to be gauge-invariant and to coincide, up to a spectral-parameter change, with a formal gauge transformation of the standard Z_T-coset Lax connection. The main new result is the Hamiltonian analysis of Section 4: using the phase-space expressions (4.2) for K_±, the paper computes all Poisson brackets and obtains an ultralocal algebra, Eq. (4.7), with {L_+,L_-}=0 and self-brackets of the standard r-matrix form. The monodromy therefore satisfies a classical Yangian Poisson algebra, opening a route to quantum inverse scattering methods for this class of models.

Significance. If the result is correct, it extends the old Brodbeck–Zagermann construction from hermitian symmetric spaces to a class of non-symmetric (for T>2) para-complex cosets, including examples such as SL(p_1+···+p_T)/(S(GL(p_1)×···×GL(p_T))). The explicit, internally consistent Poisson-bracket computations in Section 4.2 are a genuine strength, as is the fact that the Lax connection is constructed without fitting any parameter to data: the only free coefficient, the constraint-term addition to K_-, is fixed by requiring the strong vanishing of {K_+,K_-}. The relation to the standard Lax connection via a formal gauge transformation provides an independent check of flatness and gives the construction a clear conceptual footing. The ultralocality result is significant because it bypasses the long-standing obstruction posed by non-ultralocal Poisson brackets to the QISM quantization programme.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 4.1, Eqs. (4.1)–(4.2)] The canonical analysis that underpins the entire Hamiltonian computation is stated but not derived. The phase-space relation X = (KT/2)(j_>^- + j_<^+) and the assertion that X^{[0]}=0 is a first-class constraint are introduced with the sentence that the analysis is standard and its details will not be reproduced. These two inputs are load-bearing: every Poisson bracket in Section 4.2, and with them the ultralocality of the Lax connection in Eq. (4.7) and the Yangian algebra of the monodromy, depends on the precise normalization of X and on the first-class nature of the constraint. If the Legendre transform of the simplified action (3.5) produced a different normalization (for instance a factor 2 from the dx^+dx^- = (1/2) dx dt convention), all coefficients in Eq. (4.6) would change; if X^{[0]}=0 were second-class rather than first-class, the constraint-term addition to K_- and the strong vanishing of {K_+,K_-} would fail. The authors should include the canonical analysis, at least in an appendix, and state the precise measure and convention used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, notation] The projectors P_<, P_>, and P^> are typographically very close, especially in the plain rendering used after Eq. (2.22), where Y_> (positive grades) and Y^> (non-negative grades) can be confused. Please introduce unambiguous symbols, for example P_- , P_+ , and P_{\ge 0}, and use them consistently in Section 4.2, particularly in Eq. (4.5) where K_- contains the constraint-added term X^{[0]}.
  2. [Section 3.3, spectral parameter] The change of spectral parameter z(λ) = ((λ+1)/(λ-1))^{1/T} is multi-valued; the paper should specify the chosen branch or state explicitly that the identification L_U^±(z(λ)) = L^±(λ) is to be understood formally, since this matters for the global meaning of the monodromy.
  3. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.4)] The derivation of α_ab skips a step when replacing the term containing g_1^{-1}{g_1,X_2} by the final expression with P_s(a)_2 X_2. One more intermediate line using the identity [C_{12}, M_1+M_2]=0 and the antisymmetry of the Poisson bracket would make the computation significantly easier to audit.
  4. [Introduction and abstract] The term 'para-complex Z_T-cosets' is defined only in Section 2; for a reader outside the immediate subject, a sentence in the introduction explaining the difference from complex Z_T-cosets and the reason why the split real form is needed (reality conditions) would improve accessibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ultralocal Lax connection is constructed from the action and a direct Hamiltonian computation, and the final bracket algebra is an output rather than an input.

full rationale

Walk-through of the derivation: the Lagrangian current K± in (3.6) is obtained by Noether's theorem, and the Lax connection (3.7) is then defined. In Section 4.1 the paper states, without reproducing the canonical analysis, that X=(KT/2)(j_>_-+j<_+) and that X[0]=0 is a first-class constraint; this is the only major unproved input. Given this relation, the phase-space expressions (4.2) are immediate. The coefficient of the constraint term in K− is explicitly fixed so that {K+,K−} vanishes strongly; this is a transparent choice of a representative in a gauge-invariant class, not a hidden fit, and the nontrivial content is that such a choice exists and yields the self-brackets (4.6b). Ultralocality of L± follows from the absence of spatial derivatives in (4.2), and flatness is proved independently from the known flat ZT-coset Lax connection via the formal gauge transformation (3.13)-(3.14), citing [15] for the standard Lax connection. The final r-matrix/Yangian Poisson algebra is a direct computation from (4.6). Self-citations [17,18] are used only for the standard constraint-term freedom, which is also textbook material [30], so they are not load-bearing. The omitted canonical analysis in Section 4.1 is a completeness and correctness gap, not a circular reduction, because the asserted relation is not equivalent to the ultralocality claim being proved.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is self-contained apart from standard sigma-model input. The only hand-chosen constant is the constraint-term coefficient, which is not fitted to data. The main external inputs are the standard Z_T-coset action and the flatness of the ordinary Lax connection.

free parameters (1)
  • Coefficient of the constraint term added to K- = -4/(KT)
    In Section 4.1 the authors add -4/(KT) g X^{[0]} g^{-1} to K- and state the coefficient is fixed so that {K+,K-} vanishes strongly; this hand-chosen value is needed for the claimed ultralocal algebra.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption g is the split real form of a complex Lie algebra and the Killing form is non-degenerate, so g< and g> are isotropic.
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 3 to define the para-complex structure and to write the Casimir decomposition; the paper restricts to this class.
  • domain assumption There exists u in the Cartan subalgebra with integer adjoint eigenvalues in {-T+1,...,T-1}, with non-negative bi satisfying T-1=sum b_i a_i, defining the Z and Z_T gradations.
    Defines the para-complex Z_T-coset models; without such u the construction does not apply.
  • domain assumption The standard Z_T-coset action (3.1) and its gauge invariance under H, with H the centralizer of u, are valid.
    Starting point from reference [15]; used in Section 3.1.
  • domain assumption The canonical analysis of (3.5) gives X=(KT/2)(j_>^- + j_<^+) and a first-class constraint X^{[0]}=0.
    Stated without derivation in Section 4.1; needed for the Poisson bracket computations.
  • domain assumption The ordinary Z_T-coset Lax connection (3.9) is flat on-shell.
    Cited from reference [15]; used in Section 3.3 to prove flatness of K± via formal gauge transformation.
  • standard math Maurer-Cartan identities and ad-invariance of the Killing form justify dropping the total derivative in (3.4).
    Used in Section 3.1 to simplify the action to (3.5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultralocal Lax connection for para-complex $\mathbb{Z}_T$-cosets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VA3VLEAM

@misc{pith2026190900742,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultralocal Lax connection for para-complex $\mathbbZ_T$-cosets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VA3VLEAM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00742}
}
abstract

We consider $\sigma$-models on para-complex $\mathbb{Z}_T$-cosets, which are analogues of those on complex homogeneous target spaces considered recently by D. Bykov. For these models, we show the existence of a gauge-invariant Lax connection whose Poisson brackets are ultralocal. Furthermore, its light-cone components commute with one another in the sense of Poisson brackets. This extends a result of O. Brodbeck and M. Zagermann obtained twenty years ago for hermitian symmetric spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maillet, Kac-Moody algebra and extended Yang-Baxter relations in the O(N) non-linear sigma model, Phys. Lett. B162 (1985) 137

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    J. M. Maillet, New integrable canonical structures in two-dimensional models , Nucl. Phys. B269 (1986) 54

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    Faddeev and L

    L. Faddeev and L. Takhtajan, The quantum method of the inverse problem and the Heisenberg XYZ-model, Russ. Math. Surveys 34:5 (1979) 1168

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    P. P. Kulish and E. K. Sklyanin, Quantum inverse scattering method and the Heisenberg ferromagnet, Phys. Lett. A70 (1979) 461

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    Faddeev, E

    L. Faddeev, E. Sklyanin and L. Takhtajan, The Quantum Inverse Problem Method. 1, Theor. Math. Phys. 40 (1980) 688. 15

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    Freidel and J

    L. Freidel and J. M. Maillet, Quadratic algebras and integrable systems , Phys. Lett. B262 (1991) 278

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    Freidel and J

    L. Freidel and J. M. Maillet, On classical and quantum integrable field theories associated to Kac-Moody current algebras, Phys. Lett. B263 (1991) 403

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    Classical and Quantum Nonultralocal Systems on the Lattice

    M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky and A. Sevostyanov, Classical and quantum nonultralocal systems on the lattice , hep-th/9509029

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Faddeev and N

    L. Faddeev and N. Reshetikhin, Integrability of the principal chiral field model in (1+1)-dimension, Annals of Physics 167 (1986) 227

    1986

  2. [10]

    Appadu, T

    C. Appadu, T. J. Hollowood, D. Price and D. C. Thompson, Yang Baxter and Anisotropic Sigma and Lambda Models, Cyclic RG and Exact S-Matrices , JHEP 09 (2017) 035 [ 1706.05322]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Appadu, T

    C. Appadu, T. J. Hollowood and D. Price, Quantum Inverse Scattering and the Lambda Deformed Principal Chiral Model, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 305401 [1703.06699]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Appadu, T

    C. Appadu, T. J. Hollowood, D. Price and D. C. Thompson, Quantum Anisotropic Sigma and Lambda Models as Spin Chains , J. Phys. A51 (2018) 405401 [1802.06016]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Pohlmeyer, Integrable hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints, Commun

    K. Pohlmeyer, Integrable hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints, Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976) 207

    1976

  6. [14]

    Eichenherr and M

    H. Eichenherr and M. Forger, On the Dual Symmetry of the Nonlinear Sigma Models, Nucl. Phys. B155 (1979) 381

    1979

  7. [15]

    C. A. S. Young, Non-local charges, Z(m) gradings and coset space actions , Phys. Lett. B632 (2006) 559 [ hep-th/0503008]

    2006 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Sevostyanov, The Classical R matrix method for nonlinear sigma model , Int

    A. Sevostyanov, The Classical R matrix method for nonlinear sigma model , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11 (1996) 4241 [ hep-th/9509030]

    1996 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Magro, The classical exchange algebra of AdS5×S5 string theory, JHEP 0901 (2009) 021 [ 0810.4136]

    M. Magro, The classical exchange algebra of AdS5×S5 string theory, JHEP 0901 (2009) 021 [ 0810.4136]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Vicedo, Hamiltonian dynamics and the hidden symmetries of the AdS5×S5 superstring, JHEP 1001 (2010) 102 [ 0910.0221]

    B. Vicedo, Hamiltonian dynamics and the hidden symmetries of the AdS5×S5 superstring, JHEP 1001 (2010) 102 [ 0910.0221]. 16

    2010 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ke, X.-Y

    S.-M. Ke, X.-Y. Li, C. Wang and R.-H. Yue, Classical exchange algebra of the nonlinear sigma model on a supercoset target with Z(2n) grading , Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 (2011) 101101

    2011

  12. [20]

    A. G. Bytsko, The Zero curvature representation for nonlinear O(3) sigma model , J. Math. Sci. 85 (1994) 1619 [ hep-th/9403101]

    1994 arXiv

  13. [21]

    V. V. Bazhanov, G. A. Kotousov and S. L. Lukyanov, Quantum transfer-matrices for the sausage model , JHEP 01 (2018) 021 [ 1706.09941]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Brodbeck and M

    O. Brodbeck and M. Zagermann, Dimensionally reduced gravity, Hermitian symmetric spaces and the Ashtekar variables , Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 2749 [gr-qc/9911118]

    2000 arXiv

  15. [23]

    D. V. Bykov, Cyclic gradings of Lie algebras and Lax pairs for σ-models, Theor. Math. Phys. 189 (2016) 1734

    2016

  16. [24]

    Bykov, Complex structures and zero-curvature equations for σ-models, Phys

    D. Bykov, Complex structures and zero-curvature equations for σ-models, Phys. Lett. B760 (2016) 341 [ 1605.01093]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bykov, Flag manifold σ-models: The 1 N -expansion and the anomaly two-form , Nucl

    D. Bykov, Flag manifold σ-models: The 1 N -expansion and the anomaly two-form , Nucl. Phys. B941 (2019) 316 [ 1901.02861]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bykov, Integrable properties of sigma-models with non-symmetric target spaces , Nucl

    D. Bykov, Integrable properties of sigma-models with non-symmetric target spaces , Nucl. Phys. B894 (2015) 254 [ 1412.3746]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bykov, Classical solutions of a flag manifold σ-model, Nucl

    D. Bykov, Classical solutions of a flag manifold σ-model, Nucl. Phys. B902 (2016) 292 [1506.08156]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zakharov and A

    V. Zakharov and A. Mikhailov, Relativistically invariant two-dimensional models in field theory integrable by the inverse problem technique , Sov. Phys. JETP 47 (1978) 1017

    1978

  21. [29]

    Libermann, Sur le probl` eme d´ equivalence de certaines structures infinit´ esimales, Ph.D

    P. Libermann, Sur le probl` eme d´ equivalence de certaines structures infinit´ esimales, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e de Strasbourg, 1953

    1953

  22. [30]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems . Princeton University Press, 1994

    1994

  23. [31]

    Izergin and V

    A. Izergin and V. Korepin, The inverse scattering method approach to the quantum Shabat-Mikhailov model, Commun. Math. Phys. 79 (1981) 303

    1981

  24. [32]

    H. J. de Vega, H. Eichenherr and J. M. Maillet, Canonical Charge Algebras for Integrable Fermionic Theories, Phys. Lett. 132B (1983) 337. 17

    1983

  25. [33]

    N. J. MacKay, On the classical origins of Yangian symmetry in integrable field theory, Phys. Lett. B281 (1992) 90

    1992

  26. [34]

    Bernard, An Introduction to Yangian Symmetries , Int.J.Mod.Phys

    D. Bernard, An Introduction to Yangian Symmetries , Int.J.Mod.Phys. B7 (1993) 3517 [hep-th/9211133]

    1993 arXiv

  27. [35]

    N. J. MacKay, Introduction to Yangian symmetry in integrable field theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20 (2005) 7189 [ hep-th/0409183]

    2005 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Loebbert, Lectures on Yangian Symmetry, J

    F. Loebbert, Lectures on Yangian Symmetry, J. Phys. A49 (2016) 323002 [1606.02947]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Fateev, E

    V. Fateev, E. Onofri and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrable deformations of the O(3) sigma model. The sausage model , Nucl. Phys. B406 (1993) 521

    1993

  30. [38]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro and B. Vicedo, On classical q-deformations of integrable σ-models, JHEP 1311 (2013) 192 [ 1308.3581]

    2013 arXiv

  31. [39]

    T. J. Hollowood, J. L. Miramontes and D. M. Schmidtt, Integrable deformations of strings on symmetric spaces , JHEP 1411 (2014) 009 [ 1407.2840]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Vicedo, On integrable field theories as dihedral affine Gaudin models , International Mathematics Research Notices rny128 (2017) [ 1701.04856]

    B. Vicedo, On integrable field theories as dihedral affine Gaudin models , International Mathematics Research Notices rny128 (2017) [ 1701.04856]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    D’Adda, M

    A. D’Adda, M. Luscher and P. Di Vecchia, A 1/n Expandable Series of Nonlinear Sigma Models with Instantons , Nucl. Phys. B146 (1978) 63

    1978

  34. [42]

    Goldschmidt and E

    Y. Goldschmidt and E. Witten, Conservation laws in some two-dimensional models, Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 392

    1980

  35. [43]

    Abdalla, M

    E. Abdalla, M. C. B. Abdalla and M. Gomes, Anomaly in the Nonlocal Quantum Charge of the CP (n−1) Model, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 1800

    1981

  36. [44]

    Abdalla, M

    E. Abdalla, M. Forger and M. Gomes, On the origin of anomalies in the quantum nonlocal charge for the generalized nonlinear sigma models , Nucl. Phys. B210 (1982) 181

    1982

  37. [45]

    J. M. Evans, D. Kagan, N. J. MacKay and C. A. S. Young, Quantum, higher-spin, local charges in symmetric space sigma models , JHEP 01 (2005) 020 [hep-th/0408244]

    2005 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A. V. Litvinov, Integrable gl(n|n) Toda field theory and its sigma-model dual , 1901.04799. 18

    1901 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fateev, Classical and quantum integrable sigma models

    V. Fateev, Classical and quantum integrable sigma models. Ricci flow, ‘nice duality’ and perturbed rational conformal field theories , 1902.02811

    1902 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Komatsu, R

    S. Komatsu, R. Mahajan and S.-H. Shao, An Index for Quantum Integrability , 1907.07186

    1907 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Costello and M

    K. Costello and M. Yamazaki, Gauge Theory And Integrability, III , 1908.02289

    1908 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Vicedo, Holomorphic Chern-Simons theory and affine Gaudin models , 1908.07511

    B. Vicedo, Holomorphic Chern-Simons theory and affine Gaudin models , 1908.07511. 19

    1908 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.