Bethe Ansatz for XXX chain with negative spin

Dmitri Kharzeev; Kun Hao; Vladimir Korepin

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Bethe Ansatz for XXX chain with negative spin

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that every energy level of the high-energy QCD effective spin chain is a scattering state of fermionic 'lipatons' that are Z2 topological solitons of the underlying bosonic degrees of freedom.

desk verdict Competent TBA/CFT application to the QCD s=-1 chain, but the lipaton/fermion claim is imported and a (-1)^L boundary mismatch is never resolved. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00800 v3 pith:HUCUR2QA submitted 2019-09-02 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Kun Hao , Dmitri Kharzeev , Vladimir Korepin This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

keywords XXXspinchainnegativeBetheansatzlatticenonlinearSchrödingerequationlipatonZ2topologicalsolitonconformalfieldtheoryYang-Yangthermodynamics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the XXX spin chain with spin $s=-1$, which arises as an effective description of high-energy QCD, is solvable in the thermodynamic limit: every energy level is a scattering state of elementary excitations called lipatons. A lipaton is a fermion, realized as a $Z_2$ topological soliton of the underlying bosonic degrees of freedom of the lattice nonlinear Schrödinger model. The paper derives the lipaton's energy and momentum, the two-body scattering matrix, the $c=1$ conformal-field-theory description including entanglement entropy $S(y)=\frac{1}{3}\ln y$, and the Yang-Yang thermodynamics for this model and for arbitrary negative spin. If correct, these formulas give the thermodynamic and entangling properties of the small-$x$ QCD effective theory and its physical excitations.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the algebraic Bethe ansatz, equivalently the quantum inverse scattering method, applied to the lattice nonlinear Schrödinger model to which the negative-spin chain is equivalent. The load-bearing elements are the Bethe equations (1.9) with all real roots; their logarithmic form with integer or half-integer quantum numbers; the vacancy density $\rho_t(\lambda)=\rho_p(\lambda)+\rho_h(\lambda)$; the dressing equations for energy and momentum with kernel $K(\lambda,\mu)=2/(1+(\lambda-\mu)^2)$ for $s=-1$; the shift function $F$ that encodes the backflow of the Fermi sphere; and the Yang-Yang equation (4.1) for finite-temperature thermodynamics. The lipaton itself is the central object: an elementary excitation defined through anti-periodic boundary conditions, combining a particle outside the Fermi interval and a hole inside it into one $Z_2$-fermionic soliton.

What would settle it

Solve the Bethe equations (1.9) and enumerate all eigenstates for a small chain, for example $L=6$, $N=3$, and check whether every energy level in the fixed-density sector is a reflectionless scattering state of anti-periodic lipatons with real roots; a single state that is not of this form would disprove the central claim. Equivalently, compute the Yang-Yang free energy (4.12) at finite temperature from exact diagonalization of finite chains and extrapolate to the thermodynamic limit; the first mismatch would locate the breakdown of the description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the thermodynamic limit, with both the chain length $L$ and the number of particles $N$ tending to infinity at fixed density $D=N/L$, every energy level of the $s=-1$ XXX chain is a scattering state of lipatons. The ground state is a Fermi sphere of real Bethe roots filling the interval $[-q,q]$, and elementary excitations are obtained by changing periodic boundary conditions to anti-periodic boundary conditions and either adding a root outside $[-q,q]$ (a particle) or removing a root inside it (a hole), with all other roots shifted accordingly. The combined particle-hole object is the lipaton, a fermion described as a $Z_2$ topological soliton of the original bosonic degrees of freedom. The dressed energy, momentum, and scattering phase of the lipaton satisfy linear integral equations, and the low-energy theory is governed by two Virasoro algebras with central charge $c=1$, giving the critical exponent $\vartheta=2Z^2$, entanglement entropy $S(y)=\frac{1}{3}\ln y$, and quench velocity $v_F=v_e$. At finite temperature the model is described by a Yang-Yang equation from which the free energy, pressure, and entropy are obtained, with vanishing entropy at zero temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the elementary excitations of the $s=-1$ chain are correctly built by switching from periodic to anti-periodic boundary conditions and that the fermionic $Z_2$-soliton picture from the lattice nonlinear Schrödinger model transfers unchanged to the QCD chain; if that transfer is invalid, the claim that every energy level is a scattering state of lipatons has no support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In the thermodynamic limit at fixed density, any energy level of the $s=-1$ chain is a multiparticle scattering state of lipatons, and the many-body $S$-matrix factorizes into products of two-body scattering matrices.
The low-energy, long-distance behavior is governed by a $c=1$ conformal field theory: the entanglement entropy of a large subsystem of size $y$ grows as $S(y)=\frac{1}{3}\ln y$, and after a local quench entanglement spreads at velocity $v_F=v_e$.
The Yang-Yang equations yield closed-form thermodynamic potentials: free energy $F=Nh-\frac{LT}{2\pi}\int \ln(1+e^{-\varepsilon(\mu)/T})K(\mu)\,d\mu$, pressure $P=\frac{T}{2\pi}\int K(\mu)\ln(1+e^{-\varepsilon(\mu)/T})\,d\mu$, and entropy $S=-\partial F/\partial T$, with zero-temperature entropy vanishing according to the third law.
The same construction extends from $s=-1$ to every negative spin $s=-|s|$, with kernel $2|s|\kappa/((s\kappa)^2+\mu^2)$ in the corresponding Yang-Yang equations.
In the strong-coupling limit of the lattice nonlinear Schrödinger model, the lipaton has the simple dispersion $\varepsilon(k)=-h-1-\cos k$, giving a fermionic band picture of the excitations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: because lipatons are $Z_2$ solitons, only even numbers of them fit the original periodic boundary conditions, so the physical QCD Hilbert space should split into even and odd lipaton-number sectors, a parity selection rule that could show up in the degeneracies of the finite-chain spectrum.
Beyond the paper: the $c=1$ prediction $S(y)=\frac{1}{3}\ln y$ is a concrete entanglement signature for deep-inelastic scattering, and the quench velocity $v_F$ could in principle be extracted from real-time evolution of the post-collision state.
Beyond the paper: the strong-coupling dispersion $\varepsilon(k)=-h-1-\cos k$ is testable on a quantum simulator of the lattice nonlinear Schrödinger model by measuring correlation spreading after a local quench; disagreement with $v_F=v_e$ would locate where the $Z_2$-soliton description breaks down.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know about this paper. First, the thermodynamic and CFT results are standard but solid: they take the well-known lattice NLS thermodynamics and apply it to the s=-1 XXX chain that appears in high-energy QCD. The free energy, pressure, entropy, and c=1 CFT description are likely correct. Second, the headline claim about 'lipatons' being fermionic Z2 solitons is not actually derived here; it is carried over from the Korepin-Bogoliubov-Izergin book, and the paper never reconciles a concrete mismatch between the two Bethe equation sets.

The paper does useful things. It proves all Bethe roots are real (clean argument), it writes the Yang-Yang equation and derives thermodynamics for the s=-1 chain, and it gives the zero-temperature CFT data (central charge 1, entanglement entropy S=1/3 ln y, Fermi velocity as quench velocity). For someone working on small-x DIS or quantum simulation of QCD effective chains, these formulas are directly usable. The derivation follows the standard [8] route and is internally consistent.

The soft spots are in proportion. The biggest one is Eq. (1.16): the lattice NLS Bethe equations at κ=1, Δ=2 acquire a (-1)^L factor relative to the QCD s=-1 equations (1.9). The paper says the NLS model is a generalization and QCD is a special case, but it never explains this sign. If the sign comes from anti-periodic twist, then the periodic-boundary equations used for the thermodynamics are not the ones governing the claimed lipaton excitations; if it is not a twist, then the equivalence fails for odd L. Either way, the paper owes the reader an explanation. The lipaton/fermion scattering-state statement is then just an appeal to [4]; no anti-periodic Bethe equations are ever written or solved for this chain. A second, smaller gap is Theorem 2: convexity of the action does not by itself prove existence of a minimum; coercivity is not shown. That is minor for physicists, but it is a gap in a claimed proof.

Who is this for? It is for people who want concrete thermodynamic and CFT predictions for the QCD spin chain, not for people looking for a mathematically new framework. The paper is an application, and an honest one apart from the boundary-condition issue. It deserves a serious referee: the subject matters, the formulas are likely right, and the referee can require a fix of the (-1)^L mismatch and a softening or a real derivation of the lipaton claim. I would accept it for review, but I would not let it go without addressing that mismatch.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the XXX spin chain with spin s=-1, motivated by Lipatov's spin-chain description of high-energy QCD. It claims an equivalence to the lattice nonlinear Schrodinger (NLS) model, proves realness of the Bethe roots, constructs zero-temperature excitations called 'lipatons', gives a CFT description with central charge 1 and entanglement entropy S(y)=(1/3)ln y, and derives Yang-Yang thermodynamics (free energy, pressure, entropy) for the s=-1 chain and its generalization to arbitrary negative spin. The derivations follow the standard thermodynamic Bethe ansatz of Yang and Yang and of Korepin-Bogoliubov-Izergin. The main new claim is that every energy level in the thermodynamic limit is a scattering state of fermionic, Z2-soliton-like elementary excitations, the lipatons.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies the physical excitations of the effective high-energy QCD Hamiltonian and provides concrete thermodynamic formulas relevant to small-x deep-inelastic scattering and to quantum simulation. The paper gives parameter-free results: the Yang-Yang equation (4.1), free energy (4.12), pressure (4.13), entropy (4.14), and their generalizations to arbitrary negative spin (5.1)-(5.4). It also proves realness of the Bethe roots (Appendix A, Theorem 1) and gives an iterative existence argument for the Yang-Yang equation (Appendix C, Theorem 3). These are useful contributions. However, the fermionic-soliton interpretation of lipatons is currently imported from the book [4] rather than derived for the s=-1 chain, and the mismatch in Eq. (1.16) between the NLS and QCD Bethe equations is not reconciled.

major comments (3)

[Section 2.1 and Conclusion] The central claim that every energy level is a scattering state of fermionic lipatons rests on an unproven change from periodic boundary conditions (1.9) to anti-periodic boundary conditions. Footnote 3 and the text after Eq. (2.29) state that elementary excitations require this change, citing book [4], but the anti-periodic Bethe equations for s=-1 are never written, solved, or shown to describe the spectrum of the periodic chain. The statement 'any energy level... is a scattering state of several elementary excitations' is imported from formula (4.29) of Chapter I, Section 4 of [4], not proved for this model. The abstract's lipaton claim therefore has no independent support. The authors should either provide the anti-periodic Bethe ansatz analysis and demonstrate the equivalence of level counting, or clearly mark the statement as an assumption inherited from [4].
[Eq. (1.16) and surrounding text] Eq. (1.16) shows that at kappa=1 and Delta=2 the lattice NLS Bethe equations acquire a factor (-1)^L relative to the QCD Bethe equations (1.9). The text says that 'holomorphic QCD is its special case', but for odd L the two sets of equations differ by a sign. If this factor is the promised anti-periodic twist, then the periodic equations (1.9)-(1.20) used for the thermodynamics and CFT analysis are not the equations governing lipaton excitations. If it is not the twist, the claimed equivalence between the two models fails for odd L. Either way, the manuscript does not reconcile Eq. (1.16) with the subsequent use of the periodic Bethe equations, and this undermines the transfer of the NLS soliton picture to the s=-1 chain.
[Appendix A, Theorem 2] Theorem 2 claims existence of solutions to the logarithmic Bethe equations (1.20), but the proof only shows positive definiteness of the second-derivative matrix (A.12). Positive definiteness establishes that the Yang-Yang action is strictly convex, and that any critical point is a unique minimum; it does not by itself prove that a minimum is attained on the non-compact domain. A coercivity estimate or a direct fixed-point argument is needed. Since the density analysis in Section 2 and Appendix B presupposes the existence of a unique real solution set {lambda_j}, this gap is load-bearing. The authors should either supply the missing argument or explicitly cite the precise theorem from [8] and [4] that guarantees existence.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'nonlinear Schroediger's equation' should be 'nonlinear Schroedinger's equation'.
[Section 3] The central charge c=1 and the entanglement entropy S(y)=(1/3)ln y are asserted following [4,14,15], but no finite-size correction to the ground-state energy is computed. A brief derivation or a precise reference to the finite-size scaling result would make the CFT claim self-contained.
[Eq. (4.9)] The first line of Eq. (4.9) omits the integration limits; they are written as 'all integrals are from -infinity to +infinity' only in the preceding sentence. Adding the limits directly to the equation would improve readability.
[Eq. (2.14)] The phrase 'infinity density corresponds to some positive limited value of h' is vague. It should specify the limiting chemical potential or give the explicit relation h(D) in the dense limit.
[Figures 1 and 2] The figure captions describe plots of the dressed energy epsilon(lambda), but the figures themselves are not visible in the manuscript text. Please ensure that the figures are included and referenced.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Thermodynamics and CFT derivation are self-contained, but the abstract's fermionic Z2 lipaton claim is imported from the authors' own book [4] via an asserted anti-periodic boundary-condition switch that is never derived for s=-1.

self citation load bearing [Section 2 footnote 3; Section 2.1 after Eq. (2.29); Conclusion]
"The book [4] shows that for elementary excitation we have to change periodic boundary conditions to anti-periodic boundary conditions. ... Following this approach we can prove that in the sector with fixed density any energy level of lattice nonlinear Schroedinger's equation is a scattering state of several elementary excitations [lipatons], see formula (4.29) in Chapter I section 4 of the book [4]. The lipaton is a fermion. It can be represented as a topological excitation (soliton) of original bosonic degrees of freedom, described by the group Z2."

The 'lipaton is a fermion' claim is not derived from the Bethe equations solved here. The anti-periodic boundary-condition switch is justified only by citing [4], a book co-authored by Korepin; the anti-periodic Bethe equations for s=-1 are never written or solved. The paper's own density/dressed-energy analysis uses periodic equations (1.20), so the excitation spectrum is an imported premise. The conclusion repeats 'The lipaton satisfies anti-periodic boundary conditions: so only even number of lipatons will fit into periodic boundary conditions' without proof. Eq. (1.16) even leaves a (-1)^L mismatch with Eq. (1.9), so the equivalence needed to transplant the [4] result is unchecked for odd L.

full rationale

Most of the paper's technical content is not circular. The Yang-Yang thermodynamics (Sec. 4), the zero-temperature integral equations (2.4), (2.11), (2.24), the dressed charge and CFT relations (3.3)-(3.12), and the free energy/pressure/entropy formulas (4.12)-(4.14) are parameter-free consequences of the Bethe equations stated in (1.9)/(1.20), following the standard Yang-Yang method of [8]; no quantity is fitted to data and no prediction is a renamed fit parameter. The self-citation issue is concentrated in the interpretive layer: the fermionic 'lipaton' / Z2 topological-soliton claim, and the associated anti-periodic boundary-condition construction, are asserted by reference to [4] (Korepin, Bogoliubov and Izergin 1993) and [11] (Faddeev-Korepin 1978), both overlapping with the present authors. Because the paper's own Bethe analysis does not independently establish the anti-periodic excitation basis, and the (-1)^L factor in Eq. (1.16) indicates that the periodic s=-1 Bethe equations and the lattice-NLS equations are not identical for odd L, the central physical interpretation rests on an unverified self-citation. This warrants a moderate score rather than 0. The omitted anti-periodic derivation is a correctness gap; if supplied, it could remove the circularity. No evidence of fitted-input-called-prediction, definitional tautology, or imported uniqueness theorem was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The derivations rest on a chain of imported results: the QCD/spin-chain equivalence [1,2], the equivalence to lattice NLS [4,6,7], the Bethe-ansatz completeness [9,10], the anti-periodic excitation construction [4], and the Yang-Yang thermodynamic formalism [8]. None of these are fitted or invented in this paper; they are domain assumptions from the integrable-systems literature. The only named entity is the lipaton, which re-labels a known excitation. There are no free parameters fitted to data.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The s=-1 XXX chain is equivalent to the lattice NLS and to the holomorphic QCD high-energy effective Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1.1, 1.8, and 1.15-1.16).
This identification imports the QCD relevance from [1,2,4] and is not re-derived.
domain assumption The Bethe equations (1.9) are complete and all physical states are described by real roots with a unique convex Yang-Yang action (Appendix A; cites [4,8,9,10]).
Completeness is assumed from the integrable-model literature; the paper only sketches uniqueness.
domain assumption Elementary excitations are obtained by changing periodic to anti-periodic boundary conditions (Section 2.1, citing [4]).
This is load-bearing for the lipaton claim but is imported from [4] rather than derived for the s=-1 chain.
domain assumption The low-energy sector is a c=1 conformal field theory with conformal dimensions (3.5) and central charge 1 (Section 3, citing [4,14,15,16]).
This is a standard finite-size/Luttinger-liquid result applied here.
domain assumption Thermodynamics is governed by the Yang-Yang integral equation (4.1) with kernel K from the Bethe equations (Section 4, citing [8]).
The steepest-descent/variational derivation is standard and imported from [8].

invented entities (1)

lipaton (named elementary excitation of the s=-1 chain) independent evidence
purpose: Provides a single quasiparticle description of all excitations in the thermodynamic limit; the paper's central physical object.
The paper gives its dispersion (Eq. 2.34), scattering phase (Eq. 2.31), and Fermi velocity, so it is a falsifiable quasiparticle, not a free-floating postulate. It is, however, a re-labeling of the known lattice-NLS excitation of [4].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bethe Ansatz for XXX chain with negative spin." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HUCUR2QA

@misc{pith2026190900800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bethe Ansatz for XXX chain with negative spin},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HUCUR2QA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00800}
}

abstract

XXX spin chain with spin $s=-1$ appears as an effective theory of Quantum Chromodynamics. It is equivalent to lattice nonlinear Schroediger's equation: interacting chain of harmonic oscillators [bosonic]. In thermodynamic limit each energy level is a scattering state of several elementary excitations [lipatons]. Lipaton is a fermion: it can be represented as a topological excitation [soliton] of original [bosonic] degrees of freedom, described by the group $Z_2$ . We also provide the CFT description (including local quenches) and Yang-Yang thermodynamics of the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00800 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** CFT approximation to ε. The slope of the straight lines is ∂ε(λ)/∂λ|λ=q. It is the first factor of the equation (3.7) for Fermi velocity. In the thermodynamic limit, the elementary excitation energy satisfies the integral equation ε(λ) = −2 λ 2 + 1 − h + 1 2π Z q −q K(λ, µ)ε(µ)dµ, (3.1) and the energy of the hole (on the Fermi sphere) should be equal to zero, determining the Fermi spectral parameter q ε(±q) = 0. (3.… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Small $x$ behavior in QCD from maximal entanglement and conformal invariance
hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Bethe Ansatz finite-size corrections to Lipatov's spin chain yield c=1, which fixes the small-x gluon scaling to x^{-1/3}.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[8]

Yang and C

C. Yang and C. Yang, J.Math.Phys. 10 (1969) 1115–1122

work page 1969
[4]

V . E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov and A. G. Izergin, Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions , Cambridge University Press, 1993

work page 1993
[1]

High energy asymptotics of multi-color QCD and exactly sol vable lattice models

L.N.Lipatov , “High energy asymptotics of multi-color QCD and exactly sol vable lattice models” JETP Lett. 59 (1994) 596-599; Pisma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 59 (1 994) 571-574

work page 1994
[2]

L. D. Faddeev , G. P . Korchemsky ,Phys. Lett. B 342 (1995) 311-322

work page 1995
[3]

Algebraic aspects of Bethe ansatz

L.D. Faddeev , “Algebraic aspects of Bethe ansatz” , Stony Brook preprint, ITP-SB-94- 11, Mar 1994; hep-th/9404013 “The Bethe ansatz” , Andrejewski lectures, Freie Univ . preprint, SFB-288-70, Jun 1993; “Lectures on quantum inverse scattering method” in Nankai Lectures on Mathematical Physics, Integrable Syste ms, ed. by X.-C.Song, pp.23-70, Singapore: Wo...

arXiv 1994
[5]

D. E. Kharzeev and E. M. Levin, Phys. Rev . D 95, no. 11, 114008 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.114008 [arXiv:1702.03489 [hep -ph]]

arXiv 2017
[6]

A. G. Izergin and V . E. Korepin, Doklady Akademii Nauk vol 259, (l981), page 76

work page
[7]

Lattice model connected with nonlinear Schrodinger equation

V . E. Korepin and A.G. Izergin, “Lattice model connected with nonlinear Schrodinger equation” , Sov. Phys. Doklady , 26 (1981) 653-654; “Lattice versions of quantum ﬁeld theory models in two dimensions” , Nucl. Phys. B 205 (1982) 401-413

work page 1981

Show all 17 references

[9]

Faddeev , Soviet Sci

L.D. Faddeev , Soviet Sci. Reviews, Contemporary Math. Phys. , C1 (1980) 107

1980
[10]

Local hamiltonians for integrable quantum models on a lattice

V .O.Tarasov , L.A.Takhtajan and L.D.Faddeev , “Local hamiltonians for integrable quantum models on a lattice” , Theor. Math. Phys. 57 (1983) 163-181

1983
[11]

Faddeev and V .E

L.D. Faddeev and V .E. Korepin, Quantum Theory of Solito ns, Physics Reports vol 42 (1), pages 1-87, 1978

1978
[12]

Light-Cone

Lars Bonnes, Fabian H. L. Essler, and Andreas M. Lauchli , “Light-Cone” Dynam- ics After Quantum Quenches in Spin Chains, Phys. Rev . Lett. 1 13, 187203,(2014)

2014
[13]

Abolfazl Bayat, Bedoor Alkurtass, Pasquale Sodano, He nrik Johannesson, and Sougato Bose, Measurement Quench in Many-Body Systems, Phy s. Rev . Lett. 121, 030601,(2018)

2018
[14]

A. G. Izergin, V . E. Korepin and N. Y . Reshetikhin, Conformal dimensions in Bethe ansatz solvable models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, 2615-2620 ,(1989)

1989
[15]

Bogoliubov , A.G

N.M. Bogoliubov , A.G. Izergin, and N.Yu. Reshetikhin, Finite-size corrections and infrared asymptotics of the correlation functions in two di mensions, J. Phys. A20, 5361-9, (1987)

1987
[16]

V . E. Korepin, Universality of Entropy Scaling in One Di mensional Gapless Mod- els, Phys. Rev . Lett. 92, 096402, (2004)

2004
[17]

High energy QC D: Stringy picture from hidden integrability ,

A. Gorsky , I. I. Kogan and G. Korchemsky , “High energy QC D: Stringy picture from hidden integrability ,” JHEP 0205, 053 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0204183. 21

2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [8]

Yang and C

C. Yang and C. Yang, J.Math.Phys. 10 (1969) 1115–1122

work page 1969

[2] [4]

V . E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov and A. G. Izergin, Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions , Cambridge University Press, 1993

work page 1993

[3] [1]

High energy asymptotics of multi-color QCD and exactly sol vable lattice models

L.N.Lipatov , “High energy asymptotics of multi-color QCD and exactly sol vable lattice models” JETP Lett. 59 (1994) 596-599; Pisma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 59 (1 994) 571-574

work page 1994

[4] [2]

L. D. Faddeev , G. P . Korchemsky ,Phys. Lett. B 342 (1995) 311-322

work page 1995

[5] [3]

Algebraic aspects of Bethe ansatz

L.D. Faddeev , “Algebraic aspects of Bethe ansatz” , Stony Brook preprint, ITP-SB-94- 11, Mar 1994; hep-th/9404013 “The Bethe ansatz” , Andrejewski lectures, Freie Univ . preprint, SFB-288-70, Jun 1993; “Lectures on quantum inverse scattering method” in Nankai Lectures on Mathematical Physics, Integrable Syste ms, ed. by X.-C.Song, pp.23-70, Singapore: Wo...

arXiv 1994

[6] [5]

D. E. Kharzeev and E. M. Levin, Phys. Rev . D 95, no. 11, 114008 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.114008 [arXiv:1702.03489 [hep -ph]]

arXiv 2017

[7] [6]

A. G. Izergin and V . E. Korepin, Doklady Akademii Nauk vol 259, (l981), page 76

work page

[8] [7]

Lattice model connected with nonlinear Schrodinger equation

V . E. Korepin and A.G. Izergin, “Lattice model connected with nonlinear Schrodinger equation” , Sov. Phys. Doklady , 26 (1981) 653-654; “Lattice versions of quantum ﬁeld theory models in two dimensions” , Nucl. Phys. B 205 (1982) 401-413

work page 1981