Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 46 references

Thermodynamics and Phase Transition of a Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole in a Cavity

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black hole in a spherical cavity with fixed wall temperature and charge satisfies an extended first law and its phase diagram splits into two regions, one with a single phase and one with a van der Waals-like…

desk verdict Solid incremental extension of York's cavity method to Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black holes; the phase structure is plausible and the AdS comparison is honest, but the 'always two regions' claim outruns the numerical evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01275 v2 pith:KJOXUMUU submitted 2019-09-03 gr-qc hep-th

Peng Wang , Haitang Yang , Shuxuan Ying This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords Gauss-BonnetblackholecavitythermodynamicscanonicalensemblephasetransitionvanderWaals-likefirstlawofanti-deSitterresemblancehigher-dimensionalgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black hole confined in a finite spherical cavity with fixed charge and wall temperature is a fully consistent thermodynamic system: the first law holds, and the phase structure has only two possible behaviors. In one region of the charge–coupling parameter space, the system has a single black hole phase at every temperature. In the other region, a band of temperatures supports three coexisting phases, with a first-order van der Waals-like transition between small and large black holes. The authors further show that this phase structure closely mirrors the same black hole in anti-de Sitter space, suggesting that a cavity boundary and AdS boundary conditions are thermodynamically interchangeable for this theory. This matters because it extends the cavity-thermodynamics program beyond Einstein–Maxwell theory to the simplest higher-derivative gravity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Euclidean action of the static Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell solution in a spherical cavity, which yields the free energy $F(r_+; T, Q, \alpha, r_B)$ after imposing the Dirichlet boundary condition that fixes the temperature on the cavity wall. The stationarity condition $dF/dr_+ = 0$ reduces to $f'(r_+) = 4\pi T\sqrt{f(r_B)}$, i.e. $T = T_h/\sqrt{f(r_B)}$, and this relation converts the horizon radius into a temperature-dependent variable. The first law's surface term comes from differentiating the thermal energy with respect to the cavity area, defining the thermodynamic surface pressure $\lambda \equiv -\partial E/\partial A$. The two-region phase diagrams are then obtained by solving for locally stationary horizon radii and comparing the free energies of the competing phases.

What would settle it

For $D=5$ or $D=6$, evaluate the radicand $1 + 4\tilde{\alpha}(\cdots)$ in the metric function at points on the claimed two-region phase diagrams. If any advertised parameter choice makes the radicand negative somewhere between $r_+$ and $r_B$, or if increasing $\bar{\alpha}$ beyond roughly $0.06$ produces a third region, a disappearance of the transition, or a change in the number of coexisting phases, then the central claim that the two-region structure always exists would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a D-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black hole in a spherical cavity, the on-shell Euclidean action defines a free energy $F(r_+; T, Q, \alpha, r_B)$ in the canonical ensemble, and extremizing it gives the stationarity condition $f'(r_+) = 4\pi T \sqrt{f(r_B)}$, which identifies the cavity temperature as the blueshifted Hawking temperature. The paper establishes the extended first law $dE = T\,dS + \Phi\,dQ - \lambda\,dA$, where $\lambda$ is a thermodynamic surface pressure conjugate to the cavity area $A$. In both five and six dimensions, the $\bar{\alpha}$–$\bar{Q}$ parameter space contains exactly two regions: Region I has a single stable phase, while Region II exhibits three coexisting horizons (small, intermediate, and large) over a temperature interval, with the intermediate phase thermally unstable and a first-order van der Waals-like small-to-large black hole transition. The resulting phase diagrams closely match those of Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black holes in anti-de Sitter space.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the static Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell metric is a real geometry on the whole interval from the horizon to the cavity wall, meaning the expression under the square root in $f(r)$ never becomes negative; the paper states no explicit bound on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling inside the cavity, unlike the AdS constraint $0 \le \bar{\alpha} \le 1/[4(D-3)(D-4)]$, and the phase diagrams sample couplings only up to about $0.06$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The first law $dE = T\,dS + \Phi\,dQ - \lambda\,dA$ holds for a Gauss-Bonnet black hole in a cavity, so the cavity wall contributes a surface-pressure work term rather than a pressure-volume term.
  • In both $D=5$ and $D=6$, the $\bar{\alpha}$–$\bar{Q}$ parameter space splits into exactly two regions: one with a single stable phase for every temperature and one with a first-order van der Waals-like small/large black hole transition.
  • The cavity phase structure reproduces the Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell AdS phase diagrams, meaning confinement by a cavity and anti-de Sitter boundary conditions are thermodynamically interchangeable for this higher-derivative gravity theory.
  • In $D=6$ the extremal temperature depends on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling, unlike the $D=5$ case, so the location of the phase boundary is dimension-sensitive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural stress test is to push the dimensionless Gauss-Bonnet coupling beyond the sampled values (roughly $\bar{\alpha} \le 0.06$); the plotted boundaries suggest Region II shrinks as the coupling grows, and the two-region claim probably survives only while the square root in the metric function stays real throughout the cavity.
  • Because Gauss-Bonnet gravity is the lowest-order Lovelock theory, the same cavity construction could be applied to higher-order Lovelock black holes, where the number of coexisting phases might increase; the paper does not address that extension.
  • The surface pressure $\lambda$ defined by $-\partial E/\partial A$ is a new thermodynamic variable that could be studied along the coexistence curve, yielding an effective equation of state for the cavity wall that the paper leaves unexplored.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies a D-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black hole enclosed in a finite spherical cavity, in a canonical ensemble with fixed temperature and charge on the cavity wall. The authors derive the Euclidean action including the Gauss-Bonnet surface terms, obtain the free energy as a function of the horizon radius, and impose stationarity, which yields the condition that the cavity temperature equals the redshifted Hawking temperature. They claim that the first law dE = T dS + Φ dQ − λ dA holds with a surface-pressure term, and they analyze the phase structure for D = 5 and D = 6, finding numerically two regions in the (ᾱ, Q̄) parameter space: a single-phase region and a region with three coexisting black-hole phases and a first-order van der Waals-like transition. An appendix derives the corresponding Gauss-Bonnet-AdS phase structure independently, and the authors conclude that the cavity and AdS cases closely resemble each other.

Significance. If correct, the paper extends the known cavity/AdS correspondence of black-hole thermodynamics to a higher-curvature theory, which is a nontrivial and interesting test. The derivation is essentially self-contained: the Euclidean action is built from standard Gauss-Bonnet boundary terms, the extremization condition has a clear physical interpretation, and the AdS comparison in the appendix is derived independently rather than being assumed. The paper introduces no fitted parameters and makes falsifiable predictions for the phase structure of a canonical-ensemble Gauss-Bonnet black hole, which are strengths. The main reservations concern the evidentiary basis for the 'always two regions' assertion and the absence of a displayed first-law verification, as detailed in the major comments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. 4, Figs. 1 and 4] The abstract's claim that there always exist two regions in the (ᾱ, Q̄) parameter space is supported only by numerical scans over 0 ≤ ᾱ ≤ 0.06, with no analytic expression for the Region I/II boundary and no scan at larger ᾱ. The boundary curves in Figs. 1 and 4 decrease monotonically over the displayed range, so nothing in the presented evidence rules out the possibility that the boundary reaches Q_c = 0 at some finite ᾱ, which would eliminate Region II and falsify the 'always' statement. Please either derive the boundary analytically (for example, from the degeneracy condition where the swallowtail of the free energy disappears, i.e., the joint solution of the stationarity condition and ∂²F̄/∂x² = 0 at fixed Q̄), or extend the numerical scan over a substantially larger range of ᾱ with stated precision, and in either case qualify the abstract's claim to the domain actually established.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.23)-(3.26)] The first law is advertised in the abstract, but its verification is not shown: between (3.24) and (3.25) the identities ∂E/∂S = T, ∂E/∂Q = Φ and ∂E/∂A = λ are asserted with 'It is easy to verify'. Because E(r+, Q, rB) is an implicit function of T, Q and rB through the stationarity condition (3.19), and because Φ and λ involve α-dependent and redshift factors, the reader cannot check (3.25) without substantial algebra. Please present the verification explicitly, at least for ∂E/∂S and ∂E/∂Q, showing how (3.19) enters; alternatively, include the calculation in an appendix. This is load-bearing for the paper's claim that the first law remains satisfied in the cavity.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eqs. (2.15), (3.16), (3.17)] As printed, the Euclidean action (2.15) has factors of T in its first and third terms, whereas the free energy F = T S_E of (3.16), as displayed in (3.17), has no such factors and contains only the entropy term −T S. The two equations become consistent only if the factors T in (2.15) are replaced by 1/T. Please correct (2.15) or state the normalization convention for S_E explicitly.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, captions of Figs. 5 and 6] The captions of Figs. 5 and 6 refer to 'Regions I/II of FIG. 1', but these are D = 6 plots and should refer to FIG. 4; the related text in Sec. 4.2 should be adjusted to match.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, text near Fig. 3] The sentence 'From the right panel of FIG. 2' in the discussion of the D = 5 Region II example should read 'From the right panel of FIG. 3'.
  4. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.34) and (4.37)] Direct substitution of (3.21) together with the scaling definitions (4.29) gives a charge term in T̄ that scales as x^{-(2D-5)} overall, which appears to disagree with the powers printed in (4.34) and (4.37). Please verify the powers of x in the charge terms of (4.34), (4.35), (4.37) and (4.38), including a consistency check against T = f'(x)/(4π√f(x)) and against the ᾱ → 0 limit.
  5. [Sec. 4, Figs. 1 and 4] The text should state the range of ᾱ and Q̄ used in the plots and confirm that the metric function satisfies f(x) > 0 on the interval [r+/rB, 1] for the plotted parameters. Unlike the AdS case (A.45), no explicit bound on ᾱ is needed for reality of the metric, since the radicand in (2.12) is ≥ 1 for α > 0 on r+ ≤ r ≤ rB; this point is worth noting explicitly.
  6. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.28)] The extremal horizon radius re is introduced in (3.28) but never defined. Since the D = 6 extremal temperature depends on ᾱ, please give the extremality condition (T_h = 0) or a reference for its computation in both five and six dimensions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the thermodynamic derivation is self-contained and the self-citations are motivational only.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation (Euclidean action from the GB-Maxwell action and boundary terms, free energy (3.17), stationary condition (3.19), and the first law (3.26)) is carried out with explicit equations and no fitted parameters. The quantities Φ and λ in (3.24) are defined as the standard conjugates (boundary potential difference and surface pressure), and (3.25) is then verified, so the first law is a consistency check rather than a self-referential prediction. The GB solution (2.11) is cited to [38] and the AdS solution (A.39) to [8], both external and not from the present authors, so no load-bearing self-citation chain exists. The only self-citations [36,37] are used to motivate the question whether non-Einstein-Maxwell theories give boundary-condition-dependent thermodynamics; they are not used to justify any equation or phase-structure claim. The phase diagrams are numerical scans for 0≤ᾱ≤0.06; the wording 'always exist two regions' overstates the demonstrated domain, but an overbroad claim from a short scan is a support/robustness issue, not circularity. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard semi-classical Euclidean black hole thermodynamics and on the known GB-Maxwell solution; no numbers are fitted to data and no new entities are postulated. The main unstated input is the domain of parameter space in which the metric function stays real inside the cavity.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The Euclidean path integral is evaluated in the semi-classical saddle-point approximation, so F = -T ln Z ≈ T S_E (eq. 3.16).
    This is the standard black hole thermodynamics framework; used in Section 3 to turn the action into a free energy, and it assumes quantum gravity fluctuations are suppressed.
  • domain assumption Gauss-Bonnet gravity with Maxwell matter, with positive coupling α and D≥5, is the correct effective theory (eqs. 2.1-2.3).
    The paper adopts this theory from [38] and notes GB is topological in four dimensions, so it restricts to D≥5.
  • domain assumption The spacetime is static and spherically symmetric, with metric ansatz (2.7), and the solution (2.11) is the relevant black hole solution.
    The ansatz is imposed before solving the equations of motion; no uniqueness argument is given for the canonical ensemble sector.
  • standard math The boundary terms, including surface terms and flat-space subtraction in eq. (2.3), give a finite Euclidean action and the correct variational principle.
    This is the known Myers/GB boundary-term prescription [46]; the paper does not re-derive it.
  • domain assumption The wall temperature is fixed by the Euclidean time period condition (2.14), giving the redshift relation T = T_H/sqrt(f(rB)) (eq. 3.20).
    This is the Dirichlet boundary condition for the cavity ensemble; the paper assumes the wall is static and the period is uniform.
  • domain assumption Only black hole saddles are included in the phase comparison; no hot flat space, soliton, or hairy configurations are considered.
    Section 4 extremizes the free energy over r+ only and compares small/large black hole branches, implicitly neglecting other saddle points in the canonical ensemble.
  • domain assumption The square root in the metric function f(r) is real for r+ ≤ r ≤ rB, so the geometry is well-defined inside the cavity.
    Invoked implicitly in eqs. (2.12) and (4.31); no explicit bound on the coupling is given in the cavity case, unlike the AdS case in (A.45).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamics and Phase Transition of a Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole in a Cavity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KJOXUMUU

@misc{pith2026190901275,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamics and Phase Transition of a Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole in a Cavity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KJOXUMUU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01275}
}
read the original abstract

Considering a canonical ensemble, in which the temperature and the charge on a wall of the cavity are fixed, we investigate the thermodynamics of a D-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet black hole in a finite spherical cavity. Moreover, it shows that the first law of thermodynamics is still satisfied. We then discuss the phase structure and transition in both five and six dimensions. Specifically, we show that there always exist two regions in the parameter space. In one region, the system possesses one single phase. However in the other region, there could coexist three phases and a van der Waals-like phase transition occurs. Finally, we find that there is a fairly close resemblance in thermodynamic properties and phase structure of a Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black hole, either in a cavity or in anti-de Sitter space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01275 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The two regions in the α¯-Q¯ phase space of a D = 5 Gauss-Bonnet black hole in a cavity, each of which possesses distinct behavior of the phase structure and transition. Varying the temperature, there is only one phase in Regions I, while a van der Waals-like LBH/SBH phase transition occurs in Regions II. 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 T 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 x 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 T -1.0 -0.5 F [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. α¯ = 0.01 and Q¯ = 0.4 in the Regions I of FIG. 1. There is no phase transition. small BH intermediate BH large BH 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 T x 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 T F [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. α¯ = 0.01 and Q¯ = 0.03 in the Regions II of FIG. 1. There is first-order phase transition. In FIG. 1, we show that there are two regions in the α¯-Q¯ phase space of a Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell black hole in a cavity, each of which possesses distinct behavior of the phase structure and transition. There is only one phase in Regions I while a van der Waals-like LBH/SBH phase transition occurs in Regions II. Moreover, 8 [… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The two regions in the α¯-Q¯ phase of a D = 6 Gauss-Bonnet black hole in a cavity, each of which possesses distinct behavior of the phase structure and transition. Varying the temperature, there is only one phase in Regions I, while a van der Waals-like phase transitio…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left Panel α¯ = 0.005 and Q¯ = 0.4 in the Regions I of FIG. 1. There is no phase transition. small BH intermediate BH large BH 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 T x 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 T F [PITH_F…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: α¯ = 0.005 and Q¯ = 0.01 in the Regions II of FIG. 1. There is first-order phase transition. for the black holes in Region I. On the other hand, FIG. 6 shows that, for the black holes in Region II, there exists a band of temperatures where three phases coexist, and a f…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The two regions in the α¯-Q¯ represent the different phase structure of a Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space. The left panel is for the black holes in five dimensions, while the right panel is in six dimensions. In both cases, the yellow regions (Region I) have only …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 1973

  2. [2]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,” Nature 248, 30 (1974). doi:10.1038/248030a0

    doi:10.1038/248030a0 1974

  3. [3]

    Thermodynamics of Black Hol es in anti-De Sitter Space,

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of Black Hol es in anti-De Sitter Space,” Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 577 (1983). doi:10.1007/BF01208266

    doi:10.1007/bf01208266 1983

  4. [4]

    Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transit ion, and confinement in gauge theories,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transit ion, and confinement in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 505 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n3.a3 [hep-th/980 3131]

    doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n3.a3 1998

  5. [5]

    Ch arged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, “Ch arged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 064018 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.064018 [hep-th/ 9902170]

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.064018 1999

  6. [6]

    Ho lography, thermodynamics and fluctu- ations of charged AdS black holes,

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, “Ho lography, thermodynamics and fluctu- ations of charged AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 104026 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.104026 [hep-th/9904197]

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Thermodynami cs of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes 12 and conformal field theories,

    M. M. Caldarelli, G. Cognola and D. Klemm, “Thermodynami cs of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes 12 and conformal field theories,” Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 399 (2000) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/2/310 [hep-th/9908022]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces,

    R. G. Cai, “Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces,” Phys . Rev. D 65, 084014 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.084014 [hep-th/0109133]

    arXiv 2002

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Anti-de Sitter black hole t hermodynamics in higher derivative gravity and new confining deconfining phases in dual CFT,

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Anti-de Sitter black hole t hermodynamics in higher derivative gravity and new confining deconfining phases in dual CFT,” Phys. Lett. B 521, 87 (2001) Erratum: [Phys. Lett. B 542, 301 (2002)] doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01186-8, 10.101 6/S0370-2693(0...

    2001 arXiv

  2. [10]

    P-V criticality of charged A dS black holes,

    D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, “P-V criticality of charged A dS black holes,” JHEP 1207, 033 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)033 [arXiv:1205.0559 [hep-th] ]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Einstein- Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity: adS-Black Hole Solutions and their Thermodynamical properties,

    S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, “Einstein- Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity: adS-Black Hole Solutions and their Thermodynamical properties,” JHEP 1511, 157 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)157 [arXiv:1508.01311 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Van der Waals like behavior of topological AdS black holes in massive gravity,

    S. H. Hendi, R. B. Mann, S. Panahiyan and B. Eslam Panah, “ Van der Waals like behavior of topological AdS black holes in massive gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no. 2, 021501 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.021501 [arXiv:1702.00432 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Thermodynamics and Phase Tra nsitions of Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Holes in an Extended Phase Space,

    P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “Thermodynamics and Phase Tra nsitions of Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Holes in an Extended Phase Space,” JCAP 1904, no. 04, 052 (2019) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/052 [arXiv:1808.04506 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Black hole thermodynamics and the Eucl idean Einstein action,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Black hole thermodynamics and the Eucl idean Einstein action,” Phys. Rev. D 33, 2092 (1986). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.33.2092

    1986 doi

  7. [15]

    Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble,

    H. W. Braden, J. D. Brown, B. F. Whiting and J. W. York, Jr. , “Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble,” Phys. Rev. D 42, 3376 (1990). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3376

    1990 doi

  8. [16]

    Charged black hole in a canonical ensem ble,

    A. P. Lundgren, “Charged black hole in a canonical ensem ble,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 044014 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.044014 [gr-qc/0612119]

    2008 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Phase transitions and critica l behavior for charged black holes,

    S. Carlip and S. Vaidya, “Phase transitions and critica l behavior for charged black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3827 (2003) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/319 [gr-qc/03 06054]

    2003 doi

  10. [18]

    Phase transitions and criti cal behavior of black branes in canonical ensemble,

    J. X. Lu, S. Roy and Z. Xiao, “Phase transitions and criti cal behavior of black branes in canonical ensemble,” JHEP 1101, 133 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2011)133 [arXiv:1010.20 68 [hep-th]]

    2011 doi

  11. [19]

    Bubbles and Black Branes in Gran d Canonical Ensemble,

    C. Wu, Z. Xiao and J. Xu, “Bubbles and Black Branes in Gran d Canonical Ensemble,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 044009 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.044009 [arXiv:11 08.1347 [hep-th]]

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    The phase structure of black D1 /D5 (F/NS5) system in canonical ensemble,

    J. X. Lu, R. Wei and J. Xu, “The phase structure of black D1 /D5 (F/NS5) system in canonical ensemble,” JHEP 1212, 012 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2012)012 [arXiv:1210.07 08 [hep-th]]. 13

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    Modulating the phase structure of bl ack D6 branes in canonical ensemble,

    J. X. Lu and R. Wei, “Modulating the phase structure of bl ack D6 branes in canonical ensemble,” JHEP 1304, 100 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)100 [arXiv:1301.17 80 [hep-th]]

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    Phase structures of the black Dp-D( p + 4)-brane system in various ensembles I: thermal stability,

    D. Zhou and Z. Xiao, “Phase structures of the black Dp-D( p + 4)-brane system in various ensembles I: thermal stability,” JHEP 1507, 134 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)134 [arXiv:1502.00 261 [hep-th]]

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    Phase structures of the black D p-D(p + 4) -brane system in various ensem- bles II: electrical and thermodynamic stability,

    Z. Xiao and D. Zhou, “Phase structures of the black D p-D(p + 4) -brane system in various ensem- bles II: electrical and thermodynamic stability,” JHEP 1509, 028 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)028 [arXiv:1507.02088 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hairy B lack Holes in a Box,

    P. Basu, C. Krishnan and P. N. Bala Subramanian, “Hairy B lack Holes in a Box,” JHEP 1611, 041 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)041 [arXiv:1609.01208 [hep-th ]]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    On the thermodynamics of the black hole and hairy black hole transitions in the asymptotically flat spacetime with a box,

    Y. Peng, B. Wang and Y. Liu, “On the thermodynamics of the black hole and hairy black hole transitions in the asymptotically flat spacetime with a box, ” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no. 3, 176 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5652-0 [arXiv:1708.01411 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Studies of a general flat space/boson star tran sition model in a box through a language similar to holographic superconductors,

    Y. Peng, “Studies of a general flat space/boson star tran sition model in a box through a language similar to holographic superconductors,” JHEP 1707, 042 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2017)042 [arXiv:1705.08 694 [hep-th]]

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Scalar field configurations supported by charg ed compact reflecting stars in a curved spacetime,

    Y. Peng, “Scalar field configurations supported by charg ed compact reflecting stars in a curved spacetime,” Phys. Lett. B 780, 144 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.068 [arXiv: 1801.02495 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Explosion and Final State of an Unstable Reissner-Nordström Black Hole,

    N. Sanchis-Gual, J. C. Degollado, P. J. Montero, J. A. Fo nt and C. Herdeiro, “Explosion and Final State of an Unstable Reissner-Nordström Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no. 14, 141101 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.141101 [arXiv:1512.05358 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Stabi lity of black holes in Einstein-charged scalar field the- ory in a cavity,

    S. R. Dolan, S. Ponglertsakul and E. Winstanley, “Stabi lity of black holes in Einstein-charged scalar field the- ory in a cavity,” Phys. Rev. D 92, no. 12, 124047 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.124047 [a rXiv:1507.02156 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Stabi lity of gravitating charged-scalar solitons in a cavity,

    S. Ponglertsakul, E. Winstanley and S. R. Dolan, “Stabi lity of gravitating charged-scalar solitons in a cavity,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no. 2, 024031 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.024031 [ar Xiv:1604.01132 [gr- qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Dynamical formation of a Reissner-Nordström black hole with scalar hair in a cavity ,

    N. Sanchis-Gual, J. C. Degollado, C. Herdeiro, J. A. Fon t and P. J. Montero, “Dynamical formation of a Reissner-Nordström black hole with scalar hair in a cavity ,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no. 4, 044061 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.044061 [arXiv:1607.06304 [gr- qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Effect of scalar fie ld mass on gravitating charged scalar solitons and black holes in a cavity,

    S. Ponglertsakul and E. Winstanley, “Effect of scalar fie ld mass on gravitating charged scalar solitons and black holes in a cavity,” Phys. Lett. B 764, 87 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.073 [arXiv:1 610.00135 [gr-qc]]. 14

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    Dynamical formation of a hairy black hole in a cavity from the decay of unstable solitons,

    N. Sanchis-Gual, J. C. Degollado, J. A. Font, C. Herdeir o and E. Radu, “Dynamical formation of a hairy black hole in a cavity from the decay of unstable solitons,” C lass. Quant. Grav. 34, no. 16, 165001 (2017) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa7d1f [arXiv:1611.02441 [gr-qc ]]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Charged black hole bombs in a Minkowski cavity,

    O. J. C. Dias and R. Masachs, “Charged black hole bombs in a Minkowski cavity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, no. 18, 184001 (2018) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aad70b [arXi v:1801.10176 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Evading no-hair theorems: hairy black holes in a Minkowski box,

    O. J. C. Dias and R. Masachs, “Evading no-hair theorems: hairy black holes in a Minkowski box,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no. 12, 124030 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124030 [a rXiv:1802.01603 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Thermodynamics and Phase Tra nsition of a Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Hole in a Cavity,

    P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “Thermodynamics and Phase Tra nsition of a Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Hole in a Cavity,” JHEP 1907, 002 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)002 [arXiv:1901.06 216 [gr-qc]]

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    Phase Structures an d Transitions of Born-Infeld Black Holes in a Grand Canonical Ensemble,

    K. Liang, P. Wang, H. Wu and M. Yang, “Phase Structures an d Transitions of Born-Infeld Black Holes in a Grand Canonical Ensemble,” arXiv:1907.00799 [gr-qc]

    1907 arXiv

  30. [38]

    String Generated Gravity M odels,

    D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, “String Generated Gravity M odels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2656 (1985). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2656

    1985 doi

  31. [39]

    Curvature Squared Terms and String Theor ies,

    B. Zwiebach, “Curvature Squared Terms and String Theor ies,” Phys. Lett. 156B, 315 (1985). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91616-8

    1985 doi

  32. [40]

    Black hole ther modynamics and negative entropy in de Sit- ter and anti-de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    M. Cvetic, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Black hole ther modynamics and negative entropy in de Sit- ter and anti-de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Nu cl. Phys. B 628, 295 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(02)00075-5 [hep-th/0112045]

    2002 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Slowly Rotating Charged Gauss-B onnet Black holes in AdS Spaces,

    H. C. Kim and R. G. Cai, “Slowly Rotating Charged Gauss-B onnet Black holes in AdS Spaces,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 024045 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024045 [arXiv:0 711.0885 [hep-th]]

    2008 doi

  34. [42]

    Thermodyn amical Structure of AdS Black Holes in Massive Gravity with Stringy Gauge-Gravity Corrections,

    S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, “Thermodyn amical Structure of AdS Black Holes in Massive Gravity with Stringy Gauge-Gravity Corrections,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33, no. 23, 235007 (2016) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/23/235007 [arXiv:1510.00108 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Thermodynamics and holograph ic entanglement entropy for spheri- cal black holes in 5D Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    Y. Sun, H. Xu and L. Zhao, “Thermodynamics and holograph ic entanglement entropy for spheri- cal black holes in 5D Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” JHEP 1609, 060 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)060 [arXiv:1606.06531 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Holographic Van der Waals- like phase transition in the Gauss–Bonnet gravity,

    S. He, L. F. Li and X. X. Zeng, “Holographic Van der Waals- like phase transition in the Gauss–Bonnet gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 915, 243 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.12.005 [arXiv :1608.04208 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Geometry of criticality, supercri ticality and Hawking-Page transitions in Gauss- Bonnet-AdS black holes,

    A. Sahay and R. Jha, “Geometry of criticality, supercri ticality and Hawking-Page transitions in Gauss- Bonnet-AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 12, 126017 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.126017 [arXiv:1707.03629 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Higher Derivative Gravity, Surface Terms and String Theory,

    R. C. Myers, “Higher Derivative Gravity, Surface Terms and String Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 36, 392 (1987). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.36.392 15

    1987 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.