REVIEW 3 cited by
On the equivalence between Starobinsky and Higgs inflationary models in gravity and supergravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Starobinsky inflation and Higgs inflation in gravity, and their equivalence based on the common inflationary potential are extended to supergravity in the proper framework, where the Starobinsky and Higgs descriptions of inflation arise in two different gauges of the same supergravity model.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Higgs boson mass and thermal wino dark matter from Starobinsky supergravity with the MSSM
Starobinsky supergravity coupled to the MSSM links the CMB inflationary scale to the Higgs boson mass (~125 GeV) and predicts thermal wino dark matter at ~3 TeV, testable at future colliders and direct detection experiments.
-
Robustness of Starobinsky inflation in a minimal two-field scalar-tensor completion
Nearby trajectories in a minimal two-field scalar-tensor completion of Starobinsky inflation relax to an attractor where entropy sourcing is negligible, so observables remain effectively Starobinsky-like.
-
One-loop corrections to the E-type $\alpha$-attractor models of inflation and primordial black hole production
For E-type alpha-attractor inflation models tuned to produce asteroid-mass primordial black holes, the one-loop correction from cubic interactions is only a few percent of the tree-level power spectrum.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.