REVIEW 1 cited by
2019 Update on $\varepsilon_K$ with lattice QCD inputs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present updated results for $\varepsilon_K$ determined directly from the standard model (SM) with lattice QCD inputs such as $\hat{B}_K$, $|V_{cb}|$, $|V_{us}|$, $\xi_0$, $\xi_2$, $\xi_\text{LD}$, $f_K$, and $m_c$. We find that the standard model with exclusive $|V_{cb}|$ and other lattice QCD inputs describes only 65\% of the experimental value of $|\varepsilon_K|$ and does not explain its remaining 35\%, which leads to a strong tension in $|\varepsilon_K|$ at the $4.6\sigma \sim 4.2\sigma$ level between the SM theory and experiment. We also find that this tension disappears when we use the inclusive value of $|V_{cb}|$ obtained using the heavy quark expansion based on QCD sum rules.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
2024 Update on $\varepsilon_K$ with lattice QCD inputs
Using 2024 inputs and exclusive |V_cb|, the standard model predicts only about 65% of the measured |epsilon_K|, a gap that vanishes when inclusive |V_cb| is used.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.