REVIEW 1 cited by
Bayesian analysis of $b\to s\mu^+\mu^-$ Wilson coefficients using the full angular distribution of $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda(\to p\, \pi^-)\mu^+\mu^-$ decays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Following updated and extended measurements of the full angular distribution of the decay $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda(\to p\,\pi^-)\mu^+\mu^-$ by the LHCb collaborations, as well as a new measurement of the $\Lambda \to p \pi^-$ decay asymmetry parameter by the BESIII collaboration, we study the impact of these results on searches for non-standard effects in exclusive $b\to s\mu^+\mu^-$ decays. To this end, we constrain the Wilson coefficients $\mathcal{C}_{9}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{10}$ of the numerically leading dimension-six operators in the weak effective Hamiltonian, in addition to the relevant nuisance parameters. In stark contrast to previous analyses of this decay mode, the changes in the updated experimental results lead us to find very good compatibility with both the Standard Model and with the $b\to s\mu^+\mu^-$ anomalies observed in rare $B$-meson decays. We provide a detailed analysis of the impact of the partial angular distribution, the full angular distribution, and the $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda\mu^+\mu^-$ branching fraction on the Wilson coefficients. In this process, we are also able to constrain the size of the production polarization of the $\Lambda_b$ baryon at LHCb.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
New Strategies for New Physics Search with $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda \nu \bar\nu$ Decays
For longitudinally polarized Lambda_b at future Z-pole machines, Lambda_b -> Lambda nu nubar has a forward-backward asymmetry that is independent of new physics at its zero crossing and complements the branching ratio...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.