REVIEW 2 cited by
Primordial non-Gaussianity without tails -- how to measure fNL with the bulk of the density PDF
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Primordial non-Gaussianity without tails -- how to measure fNL with the bulk of the density PDF
read the original abstract
We investigate the possibility to detect primordial non-Gaussianity by analysing the bulk of the probability distribution function (PDF) of late-time cosmic density fluctuations. For this purpose we devise a new method to predict the impact of general non-Gaussian initial conditions on the late-time density PDF. At redshift $z=1$ and for a smoothing scale of 30Mpc/$h$ our predictions agree with the high-resolution Quijote N-body simulations to $\sim 0.2\%$ precision. This is within cosmic variance of a $\sim 100(\mathrm{Gpc}/h)^3$ survey volume. When restricting to this 30Mpc/$h$ smoothing scale and to mildly non-linear densities ($\delta[30\mathrm{Mpc}/h] \in [-0.3, 0.4]$) and also marginalizing over potential ignorance of the amplitude of the non-linear power spectrum an analysis of the PDF for such a survey volume can still measure the amplitude of different primordial bispectrum shapes to an accuracy of \smash{$\Delta f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{loc}}=\pm 7.4\ ,\ \Delta f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{equi}}=\pm 22.0\ ,\ \Delta f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{ortho}}=\pm 46.0$} . When pushing to smaller scales and assuming a joint analysis of the PDF with smoothing radii of 30Mpc/$h$ and 15Mpc/$h$ ($\delta[15\mathrm{Mpc}/h] \in [-0.4, 0.5]$) this improves to \smash{$\Delta f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{loc}}=\pm 3.3\ ,\ \Delta f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{equi}}=\pm 11.0\ ,\ \Delta f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{ortho}}=\pm 17.0\ $} - even when marginalizing over the non-linear variances at both scales as two free parameters. Especially, such an analysis could simultaneously measure $f_{\mathrm{NL}}$ and the amplitude and slope of the non-linear power spectrum. However, at 15Mpc/$h$ our predictions are only accurate to $\lesssim 0.8\%$ for the considered density range. We discuss how this has to be improved in order to push to these small scales and make full use of upcoming surveys with a PDF-based analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
One with HI: Modelling HI Intensity Mapping one-point statistics including systematics
The HI one-point PDF, modelled with large-deviation statistics and validated against simulations including beam and foreground systematics, tightens cosmological constraints and breaks the sigma8-b1 degeneracy beyond ...
-
Beyond {\Lambda}CDM with the SKA Observatory -- II: Unveiling the Secrets of the Early Universe
Updated SKAO-AA4 forecasts show multi-tracer HI+galaxy analyses can reach σ(f_local_NL)≲1 and improve αs bounds by tens of percent when combined with future CMB, while foregrounds and GR light-cone effects remain the ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.