REVIEW 2 cited by
Hints of dark energy anisotropic stress using Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Recent analyses of the Planck data and quasars at high redshifts have suggested possible deviations from the flat $\Lambda$ cold dark matter model ($\Lambda$CDM), where $\Lambda$ is the cosmological constant. Here we use machine learning methods to investigate any possible deviations from $\Lambda$CDM at both low and high redshifts by using the latest cosmological data. Specifically, we apply the Genetic Algorithms to explore the nature of dark energy (DE) in a model independent fashion by reconstructing its equation of state $w(z)$, the growth index of matter density perturbations $\gamma(z)$, the linear DE anisotropic stress $\eta_\textrm{DE}(z)$ and the adiabatic sound speed $c_\textrm{s,DE}^2(z)$ of DE perturbations. We find a $\sim2\sigma$ deviation of $w(z)$ from -1 at high redshifts, the adiabatic sound speed is negative at the $\sim2.5\sigma$ level at $z=0.1$ and a $\sim2\sigma$ deviation of the anisotropic stress from unity at low redshifts and $\sim4 \sigma$ at high redshifts. These results hint towards either the presence of an non-adiabatic component in the DE sound speed or the presence of DE anisotropic stress, thus hinting at possible deviations from the $\Lambda$CDM model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Comparative analysis of the NANOgrav Hellings-Downs as a window into new physics
Using NANOGrav 15-year data, four modified Hellings-Downs models are compared; spin-2 ultralight dark matter and massive gravity match the standard prediction, while weak, non-definitive evidence favors a non-Gaussian...
-
Bayesian and Machine-Learning Analyses of Nonminimal $f(Q)$ Gravity and $H_0$ Tension
A nonminimal f(Q) gravity model fitted to CC, DESI BAO and three supernova samples gives H0 ≈ 68 km/s/Mpc, similar to ΛCDM, and is disfavored by BIC.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.