REVIEW 1 cited by
Distinguishing Inert Higgs Doublet and Inert Triplet Scenarios
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this article we consider a comparative study between Type-I 2HDM and $Y=0$, $SU(2)$ triplet extensions having one $Z_2$-odd doublet and triplet that render the desired dark matter(DM). For the inert doublet model (IDM) either a neutral scalar or pseudoscalar can be the DM, whereas for inert triplet model (ITM) it is a CP-even scalar. The bounds from perturbativity and vacuum stability are studied for both the scenarios by calculating the two-loop beta functions. While the quartic couplings are restricted to $0.1-0.2$ for a Planck scale perturbativity for IDM, these are much relaxed ($0.8$ ) for ITM. The RG-improved potentials by Coleman-Weinberg show the regions of stability, meta-stability and instability of the electroweak vacuum. The constraints coming from DM relic, the direct and indirect experiments like XENON1T, LUX and H.E.S.S., Fermi-LAT allow the DM mass $\gtrsim 700, \,1176$ GeV for IDM, ITM respectively. Though mass-splitting among $Z_2$-odd particles in IDM is a possibility for ITM we have to rely on loop-corrections. The phenomenological signatures at the LHC show that the mono-lepton plus missing energy with prompt and displaced decays in the case of IDM and ITM can distinguish such scenarios at the LHC along with other complementary modes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dark clouds to silver linings over the hyperchargeless scalar triplets
Under current constraints, the inert triplet model is insufficient for dark matter and for a first-order phase transition, while the non-inert triplet model retains a narrow 150 to 275 GeV window for a strong two-step...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.