Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interpreting neural network models of residual scalar flux

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.07207 v4 pith:GZ4SD6ZY submitted 2020-04-15 physics.comp-ph physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.comp-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords modelsneuralscalarclosuressubfilteranalysisartificialdiagnostics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that in addition to providing effective and competitive closures, when analysed in terms of dynamics and physically-relevant diagnostics, artificial neural networks (ANNs) can be both interpretable and provide useful insights in the on-going task of developing and improving turbulence closures. In the context of large-eddy simulations (LES) of a passive scalar in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, exact subfilter fluxes obtained by filtering direct numerical simulations (DNS) are used both to train deep ANN models as a function of filtered variables, and to optimise the coefficients of a turbulent Prandtl number LES closure. \textit{A-priori} analysis of the subfilter scalar variance transfer rate demonstrates that learnt ANN models out-perform optimised turbulent Prandtl number closures and Clark-type gradient models. Next, \textit{a-posteriori} solutions are obtained with each model over several integral timescales. These experiments reveal, with single- and multi-point diagnostics, that ANN models temporally track exact resolved scalar variance with greater accuracy compared to other subfilter flux models for a given filter length scale. Finally, we interpret the artificial neural networks statistically with differential sensitivity analysis to show that the ANN models feature dynamics reminiscent of so-called "mixed models", where mixed models are understood as comprising both a structural and functional component. Besides enabling enhanced-accuracy LES of passive scalars henceforth, we anticipate this work to contribute to utilising neural network models as a tool in interpretability, robustness and model discovery.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools