Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.02531 v3 pith:UHD7GNVN submitted 2020-05-05 astro-ph.IM gr-qc

classification astro-ph.IMgr-qc
keywords errorsystematicdetectorsestimatedobservingresponseadvanceddetector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves. We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on systematic error and associated uncertainty to be $< 7\%$ in magnitude and $< 4$ deg in phase ($68\%$ confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of $< 2\%$ in magnitude and $< 2$ deg in phase.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Directional Search for Persistent Gravitational Waves: Results from the First Part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Fourth Observing Run

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An 8.3-year LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA search for persistent, direction-dependent gravitational waves finds no signal and yields the most restrictive upper limits to date on anisotropic backgrounds and targeted sources.

  2. Upper Limits on the Isotropic Gravitational-Wave Background from the first part of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA's fourth Observing Run

    gr-qc 2025-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    No gravitational-wave background is detected in O1-O4a data; the new CBC-spectrum limit Ω_GW(25 Hz) = 2.0×10^-9 (95%) is 1.7x tighter and remains roughly 2-3x above the GWTC-4-predicted astrophysical background of 0.9×10^-9.

  3. All-sky search for short gravitational-wave bursts in the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An all-sky search of O4a LIGO data finds no new gravitational-wave bursts and improves burst sensitivity and rate limits by factors of 2 to 10 over the previous run.

Pith tools