Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bayesian Comparison of the Cosmic Duality Scenarios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.04131 v3 pith:5ISSPLHN submitted 2020-05-08 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cddrbayesiandistancesangularcomparisoncosmicdiameterduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR), $D_{\rm L}(1+z)^{-2}/D_{\rm A}=\eta=1$, with $D_{\rm L}$ and $D_{\rm A}$, being the luminosity and angular diameter distances, respectively, is a crucial premise in cosmological scenarios. Many investigations try to test CDDR through observational approaches, even some of these ones also consider a deformed CDDR, i.e., $\eta=\eta(z)$. In this paper, we use type Ia supernovae luminosity distances and galaxy cluster measurements (their angular diameter distances and gas mass fractions) in order to perform a Bayesian model comparison between $ \eta(z) $ functions. We show that the data here used are unable to pinpoint, with a high degree of Bayesian evidence, which $\eta(z)$ function best captures the evolution of CDDR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Investigating the cosmic distance duality relation with gamma-ray bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combined gamma-ray burst and multi-probe data show no significant violation of the cosmic distance duality relation and prefer a Planck-like Hubble constant.

  2. Cosmic distance duality after DESI 2024 data release and dark energy evolution

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using DESI BAO, galaxy clusters, supernovae and Hubble data, the authors find no evidence for violation of the cosmic distance duality and favor flat ΛCDM.

Pith tools