Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Parameter Inference for Weak Lensing using Gaussian Processes and MOPED

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.06551 v2 pith:V4JZ4K7E submitted 2020-05-13 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords mopeddatalensingweakcasefactorgaussianlikelihood
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we propose a Gaussian Process (GP) emulator for the calculation of a) tomographic weak lensing band-power spectra, and b) coefficients of summary data massively compressed with the MOPED algorithm. In the former case cosmological parameter inference is accelerated by a factor of $\sim 10$-$30$ compared to explicit calls to the Boltzmann solver CLASS when applied to KiDS-450 weak lensing data. Much larger gains will come with future data, where with MOPED compression, the speed up can be up to a factor of $\sim 10^3$ when the common Limber approximation is used. Furthermore, the GP opens up the possibility of dropping the Limber approximation, without which the theoretical calculations may be unfeasibly slow. A potential advantage of GPs is that an error on the emulated function can be computed and this uncertainty incorporated into the likelihood. If speed is of the essence, then the mean of the Gaussian Process can be used and the uncertainty ignored. We compute the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the emulator likelihood and the CLASS likelihood, and on the basis of this and from analysing the uncertainties on the parameters, we find that in this case, the inclusion of the GP uncertainty does not justify the extra computational expense in the test application. For future weak lensing surveys such as Euclid and Legacy Survey of Space and Telescope (LSST), the number of summary statistics will be large, up to $\sim 10^{4}$. The speed of MOPED is determined by the number of parameters, not the number of summary data, so the gains are very large. In the non-Limber case, the speed-up can be a factor of $\sim 10^5$, provided that a fast way to compute the theoretical MOPED coefficients is available. The GP presented here provides such a fast mechanism and enables MOPED to be employed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effort: a fast and differentiable emulator for the Effective Field Theory of the Large Scale Structure of the Universe

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fast, differentiable emulator for EFTofLSS galaxy power spectra, validated against pybird on simulations and BOSS data, enables gradient-based MCMC inference.

  2. Emulating Recombination with Neural Networks using Universal Differential Equations

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A neural-network ordinary differential equation learned HYREC-2 recombination histories with 0.16 percent average error over a narrow range of three cosmological parameters.

Pith tools