REVIEW 2 cited by
Is there any measurable redshift dependence on the SN Ia absolute magnitude?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We test the cosmological implications of a varying absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae using the Pantheon compilation, by reconstructing different phenomenological approaches that could justify a varying absolute magnitude, but also approaches based on cosmic voids, modified gravity models and a binning scheme. In all the cases considered in this work, we find good agreement with the expected values of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model and no evidence of new physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Reconstructing the redshift evolution of Type Ia supernovae absolute magnitude
A Gaussian Process reconstruction finds the Type Ia supernova absolute magnitude is consistent with a constant value, with a redshift-averaged M = -19.456 ± 0.059 that is 3.2 sigma below the SH0ES local calibration.
-
Alleviating the Hubble Tension with a Local Void and Transitions of the Absolute Magnitude
Deep LTB void models with two or three distance-dependent jumps in the supernova absolute magnitude fit Pantheon+ and Planck data well and push the inferred local Hubble constant toward the SH0ES value.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.