Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Federated and continual learning for classification tasks in a society of devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.07129 v2 pith:AJATZ2LI submitted 2020-06-12 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords devicesfederatedlearningcontinualdatatimeallowsdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Today we live in a context in which devices are increasingly interconnected and sensorized and are almost ubiquitous. Deep learning has become in recent years a popular way to extract knowledge from the huge amount of data that these devices are able to collect. Nevertheless, centralized state-of-the-art learning methods have a number of drawbacks when facing real distributed problems, in which the available information is usually private, partial, biased and evolving over time. Federated learning is a popular framework that allows multiple distributed devices to train models remotely, collaboratively, and preserving data privacy. However, the current proposals in federated learning focus on deep architectures that in many cases are not feasible to implement in non-dedicated devices such as smartphones. Also, little research has been done regarding the scenario where data distribution changes over time in unforeseen ways, causing what is known as concept drift. Therefore, in this work we want to present Light Federated and Continual Consensus (LFedCon2), a new federated and continual architecture that uses light, traditional learners. Our method allows powerless devices (such as smartphones or robots) to learn in real time, locally, continuously, autonomously and from users, but also improving models globally, in the cloud, combining what is learned locally, in the devices. In order to test our proposal, we have applied it in a heterogeneous community of smartphone users to solve the problem of walking recognition. The results show the advantages that LFedCon2 provides with respect to other state-of-the-art methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unleashing the Power of Continual Learning on Non-Centralized Devices: A Survey

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review of non-centralized continual learning that taxonomizes data-, model-, and device-level methods and benchmarks twelve federated continual learning methods on six datasets.

  2. Federated Continual Learning for Edge-AI: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes federated continual learning methods into class, domain, and task continual learning categories for edge-AI applications.

Pith tools