REVIEW 2 cited by
Federated and continual learning for classification tasks in a society of devices
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Today we live in a context in which devices are increasingly interconnected and sensorized and are almost ubiquitous. Deep learning has become in recent years a popular way to extract knowledge from the huge amount of data that these devices are able to collect. Nevertheless, centralized state-of-the-art learning methods have a number of drawbacks when facing real distributed problems, in which the available information is usually private, partial, biased and evolving over time. Federated learning is a popular framework that allows multiple distributed devices to train models remotely, collaboratively, and preserving data privacy. However, the current proposals in federated learning focus on deep architectures that in many cases are not feasible to implement in non-dedicated devices such as smartphones. Also, little research has been done regarding the scenario where data distribution changes over time in unforeseen ways, causing what is known as concept drift. Therefore, in this work we want to present Light Federated and Continual Consensus (LFedCon2), a new federated and continual architecture that uses light, traditional learners. Our method allows powerless devices (such as smartphones or robots) to learn in real time, locally, continuously, autonomously and from users, but also improving models globally, in the cloud, combining what is learned locally, in the devices. In order to test our proposal, we have applied it in a heterogeneous community of smartphone users to solve the problem of walking recognition. The results show the advantages that LFedCon2 provides with respect to other state-of-the-art methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Unleashing the Power of Continual Learning on Non-Centralized Devices: A Survey
A review of non-centralized continual learning that taxonomizes data-, model-, and device-level methods and benchmarks twelve federated continual learning methods on six datasets.
-
Federated Continual Learning for Edge-AI: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey that organizes federated continual learning methods into class, domain, and task continual learning categories for edge-AI applications.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.